Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Garden View Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with significant cognitive impairment and a history of hypersexuality engaged in repeated non-consensual sexual contact with several other cognitively impaired residents, including touching, kissing, and groping. Despite multiple incidents witnessed or reported by staff, the facility did not implement effective interventions or consistently assess capacity to consent, and key leadership was not informed of the ongoing abuse.
Staff failed to report multiple incidents of sexual abuse involving cognitively impaired residents to the state agency and resident representatives, despite facility policy requiring prompt notification. The incidents, which included inappropriate touching and kissing by a resident with a history of such behaviors, were documented in progress notes but not communicated to authorities or families. Interviews revealed confusion among staff about reporting responsibilities and a lack of awareness among leadership regarding the events.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment reported being stalked and hit by an unidentified individual. Despite consistent accounts of the incident, the facility's administrator did not conduct a formal investigation or report the allegations to the state agency, citing conflicting stories. The facility's policy requires prompt reporting and investigation of abuse allegations, but the administrator and DON did not adhere to this policy, resulting in a deficiency.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment alleged being hit by a CNA, but the facility failed to conduct a timely investigation or suspend the CNA, contrary to its policy. The resident reported feeling unsafe, but the Administrator dismissed the claims as delusional without notifying the state agency. The facility's inaction led to a deficiency finding.
A resident with a history of trauma and mental health disorders exhibited increased paranoia and reported being hit, but the facility failed to implement a care plan addressing these issues. Staff were unaware of the resident's psychiatric history, and care plans lacked interventions for trauma and behavioral changes. The facility did not provide trauma-informed care or educate staff on PTSD, leading to inadequate support for the resident's mental health needs.
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness and sanitation in the kitchen and nourishment centers, with issues such as soiled surfaces, improper use of hair and beard restraints, and uncovered food items during transport. Ice machines were in poor condition, with buildups of debris and broken doors, exposing ice to contamination. These deficiencies highlight significant lapses in food safety and sanitation standards.
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during resident care, with staff not washing hands or changing gloves appropriately. Additionally, the facility did not complete required TB tests for new employees and failed to monitor cold water temperatures to prevent Legionella growth. These deficiencies indicate lapses in infection control and employee health screening protocols.
A facility failed to provide adequate incontinence and oral care for two residents. One resident, with severe cognitive impairment, was repeatedly observed with strong urine and fecal odors, indicating a lack of timely incontinence care. Additionally, oral care was often neglected due to time constraints. Another resident, requiring substantial assistance with oral hygiene, reported not receiving help, and observations confirmed the absence of oral care supplies in the room.
The facility failed to ensure resident safety by not following transfer protocols for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, requiring two-person assistance. A CNA assisted the resident alone without a gait belt, leading to an unsafe transfer. Additionally, the facility did not properly document or address a fall incident involving another resident, failing to follow fall protocols and implement new interventions. Staff interviews revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the fall.
The facility failed to properly manage oxygen tubing for two residents with COPD, as their care plans lacked directives for changing or dating the tubing. Observations showed undated tubing, and staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in responsibility for changing and documenting the tubing. The facility lacked a policy for this task.
The facility failed to remove expired medications and COVID-19 test kits, with some items remaining for over 100 days past expiration. Medications for a discharged resident were also found 182 days after discharge, and medications without orders were stored for a current resident. The DON admitted to not checking the storage room recently, and the LPN was unaware of the medications' presence.
The facility's pest control program was ineffective, resulting in a roach infestation in the kitchen and dishwashing areas. Observations showed insects crawling near kitchen equipment, and interviews revealed delayed responses to pest sightings due to a billing issue with the pest control company. The facility's policy requires an ongoing pest control program, but recent treatments only addressed the exterior, not the interior.
A facility failed to assess and document the use of bed rails for a resident with a history of falls and mobility issues. The facility did not conduct a risk assessment for entrapment, document alternatives, or obtain informed consent before using bed rails. Despite the resident's care plan indicating the use of side rails, there was no physician's order or necessary documentation. The DON acknowledged the lack of required assessments and documentation, yet the decision to keep the bed rail was made without proper protocol.
A facility failed to perform regular inspections of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, leading to a deficiency in identifying potential entrapment hazards. A resident with a history of falls and mobility issues used a half bed rail without documented assessment or consent. The Maintenance Director was unaware of his responsibility to measure bed rails for entrapment zones, and no safety checks were conducted, as required by facility policy.
The facility failed to provide written transfer notices to residents and/or their representatives when six residents were transferred to the hospital. Despite the facility's policy requiring written notice before transfers, there was no documentation of such notices in the medical records of the affected residents. This deficiency was confirmed by the Administrator, who noted that nurses were not providing the necessary notices during transfers.
The facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to residents or their representatives within 24 hours of hospital transfer, affecting four residents. Despite the policy requiring written communication, staff only discussed it via phone without documentation. The Administrator confirmed that nurses were not providing the policy as required.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual Abuse by Another Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect multiple residents from sexual abuse by another resident who exhibited a pattern of inappropriate sexual behaviors. One resident with significant cognitive impairment and a history of hypersexuality was repeatedly observed or reported to have engaged in non-consensual sexual contact with several other residents, all of whom had documented cognitive deficits or dementia and lacked the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Incidents included the resident putting hands down another resident's pants and touching the perineal area, rubbing another resident's breasts, kissing a resident on the mouth, and groping a resident's breast. These events occurred in various locations within the facility, including resident rooms and common areas, and were witnessed or reported by staff on multiple occasions. Despite these repeated incidents, there was no evidence that the facility implemented new or effective interventions to protect the affected residents or prevent further abuse after each event. Documentation showed that staff often redirected the resident or removed them from the situation, but there was no indication of comprehensive assessment, increased supervision, or other protective measures being put in place following the incidents. Additionally, the facility did not consistently notify the families or representatives of the affected residents about the incidents, nor did they document assessments of the residents' capacity to consent to sexual contact, as required by facility policy. Interviews with staff and administration revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the ongoing behaviors and incidents. Key leadership, including the DON and Administrator, were not informed of several incidents until much later, and some staff did not recognize the behaviors as abuse, attributing them instead to memory care behaviors. The facility's policies required assessment of capacity to consent and interventions to prevent abuse, but these were not followed. The affected residents all had diagnoses of dementia or other cognitive impairments, and their representatives confirmed that the residents would not have wanted or been able to consent to such contact.
Failure to Report Sexual Abuse Allegations Involving Cognitively Impaired Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report multiple witnessed and documented incidents of sexual abuse involving three residents who lacked the capacity to consent to sexual activity. Staff observed a resident with a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors, including rubbing another resident's breasts, kissing a resident on the mouth, and groping a resident's breast. Despite these incidents being documented in progress notes and discussed among staff, there was no evidence that the events were reported to the state agency or to the residents' representatives as required by facility policy and federal regulations. The residents involved had significant cognitive impairments, including diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and were documented as having impaired judgment and decision-making abilities. The facility's own policies required prompt reporting of all allegations of abuse to appropriate authorities and to the residents' representatives, as well as evaluation of capacity to consent for any resident involved in sexual activity. However, there was no documentation of such evaluations or notifications in the residents' records, and interviews with representatives confirmed they were not informed of the incidents. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of clarity and follow-through regarding reporting responsibilities. Some staff believed the behaviors were not abuse due to the perpetrator's cognitive status, while others assumed incidents had already been reported or did not recognize the need to report. Leadership, including the DON and Administrator, were unaware of the incidents until much later and acknowledged that the events should have been reported according to policy. The failure to report these incidents constituted a violation of both facility policy and regulatory requirements.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately report allegations of physical abuse involving a resident to the state agency. The resident, who was admitted to the facility with moderate cognitive impairment, reported being stalked and hit by an unidentified individual. Despite the resident's consistent account of the incident, the facility's administrator did not conduct a formal investigation or report the allegations to the state agency, citing conflicting stories and the resident's denial of being hit when questioned. The facility's policy mandates that all allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment be promptly reported to the appropriate authorities and thoroughly investigated. However, the administrator and the Director of Nursing did not adhere to this policy. The administrator received reports of the resident's allegations from various staff members, including the Social Services Director and Activity Assistant, but dismissed them as delusional without further investigation. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident had expressed fear and distress over the alleged abuse, even leaving a note on their door warning against entry. Despite these clear signs of distress and the facility's policy requirements, the administrator failed to take the necessary steps to ensure the resident's safety and report the incident, resulting in a deficiency in the facility's handling of abuse allegations.
Failure to Investigate Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a timely and thorough investigation following an allegation of physical abuse made by a resident. The resident, who has moderate cognitive impairment, reported being hit by a young person fitting the description of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) working at the facility. Despite the resident's allegations, the facility did not suspend the CNA or conduct a formal investigation, allowing the CNA to continue working, which did not align with the facility's policy for handling abuse allegations. The resident expressed feeling unsafe and reported the incident to various staff members, including an Activity Assistant and the Social Services Director. The Social Services Director reported the incident to the Administrator, but the Administrator dismissed the allegations as delusional without conducting a formal investigation or notifying the state agency. The Director of Nursing (DON) also failed to investigate the CNA as a potential abuser, assuming the resident's claims were delusional. The facility's policy requires immediate suspension of any employee accused of abuse and a thorough investigation, which was not followed in this case. The Administrator acknowledged receiving reports of the allegations but did not take appropriate action, resulting in a failure to protect the resident and ensure their safety. The lack of a formal investigation and failure to report the incident to the state agency contributed to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
Failure to Address Trauma and Mental Health Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care and interventions for a resident with a significant history of trauma and mental health disorders, including major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. The resident, who had experienced severe trauma in the past, began exhibiting increased paranoia and reported being hit by an unidentified person. Despite these symptoms, the facility did not have a care plan in place to address the resident's history of trauma or the current behavioral changes. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and understanding of the resident's psychiatric history and the potential impact of past trauma on current behavior. The Licensed Practical Nurse/MDS coordinator and the Social Services Director admitted to not having read the psychiatric notes, which documented the resident's traumatic experiences and ongoing mental health issues. The resident's care plans did not include interventions to address the trauma or the recent behavioral changes, such as paranoia and feelings of being unsafe. The facility's failure to incorporate trauma-informed care and appropriate interventions into the resident's care plan was further highlighted by the lack of staff education on trauma and PTSD. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator acknowledged the need for staff to be aware of the resident's psychiatric history and to implement interventions to manage the resident's paranoia and trauma-related symptoms. The physician also emphasized the importance of recognizing the role of past trauma in the resident's current mental health status and the need for targeted interventions.
Sanitation and Hygiene Deficiencies in Kitchen and Nourishment Centers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness and sanitation in the kitchen and nourishment centers, as observed during a survey. Numerous issues were identified, including opened containers of salad dressing and mayonnaise without expiration or use-by dates, soiled lids on bulk flour and sugar bins, and uncovered pans of gelatin in the refrigerator. The kitchen surfaces, including the floor under the freezer and refrigerator, were soiled with debris, and there was a presence of mold-like debris on fan covers in the refrigerator. Additionally, the facility did not ensure proper use of hair and beard restraints by dietary staff, leading to potential contamination of food items. The ice machines in the kitchen and nourishment centers were found to be in poor condition, with heavy buildups of slimy yellow and crusty white debris, and a lack of proper air gaps in the drainage system. The door to the ice machine in the C Wing nourishment center was broken and could not close, leaving the ice exposed to contamination. Despite maintenance attempts, the issue persisted, and staff reported the problem had been ongoing for months. The facility's policy required regular cleaning and maintenance of these machines, but these procedures were not adequately followed. Furthermore, the facility failed to cover food and drink items when transporting meal trays to residents' rooms. Observations showed that while plates were covered, desserts and drinks were left uncovered during transport, increasing the risk of contamination. The dietary manager acknowledged these lapses, noting that all food items should be covered, and staff should adhere to hygiene practices, including wearing appropriate hair and beard restraints. These deficiencies highlight significant lapses in the facility's adherence to food safety and sanitation standards.
Inadequate Infection Control and TB Screening in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices among staff during personal care for four residents. Observations revealed that staff members did not wash their hands or change gloves appropriately between tasks, particularly when moving from soiled to clean tasks. For instance, a CNA was observed cleaning a resident's perineal area and then touching clean supplies without changing gloves or washing hands. This was a common issue across multiple staff members, indicating a systemic failure to adhere to the facility's hand hygiene policy. Additionally, the facility did not complete required Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST) and annual evaluations for tuberculosis for three new employees. The employee files lacked documentation of the necessary two-step TST or any annual TB evaluations. Interviews with the DON/Infection Preventionist revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through on these requirements, leading to non-compliance with the facility's TB screening policy. The facility also failed to monitor cold water temperatures as part of their water management program, which is crucial for preventing the growth of waterborne pathogens like Legionella. The maintenance director admitted to not measuring cold water temperatures and was not fully aware of the risks associated with Legionella growth. This oversight indicates a gap in the facility's infection prevention and control program, as the water management policy was not being fully implemented.
Deficiencies in Incontinence and Oral Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services for incontinence and oral care for two residents. Resident #1, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, was observed multiple times with strong urine and fecal odors, indicating a lack of timely incontinence care. Despite being incontinent of bowel and bladder, staff did not consistently check or change the resident every two hours as required, leading to the resident being transported to the dining room with soiled clothing. Additionally, Resident #1 did not receive adequate oral care. Observations showed debris around the resident's mouth, and staff interviews revealed that oral care was often neglected due to time constraints. The facility's policy lacked specific documentation on when staff should assist with oral care, contributing to the oversight. Resident #29, who required substantial assistance with oral hygiene, also did not receive proper oral care. The resident reported not receiving assistance, and observations confirmed the absence of oral care supplies in the room. The resident's electronic health record lacked documentation of oral hygiene being provided, highlighting a systemic issue in the facility's care practices.
Failure to Ensure Resident Safety and Proper Fall Protocols
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident safety by not adhering to the care plan and transfer protocols for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and high fall risk. The resident required extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers, as indicated in the care plan. However, during an observation, a CNA assisted the resident alone without using a gait belt, which was against the facility's policy. The CNA acknowledged the need for a second person due to the resident's agitation but proceeded alone due to a lack of available staff. This resulted in an unsafe transfer process, where the CNA used their leg to support the resident, which was deemed inappropriate by the DON. Another deficiency was identified in the facility's handling of a fall incident involving a resident with moderately impaired cognition and a history of falls. The resident fell out of bed and was taken to the hospital, but the facility failed to document the incident comprehensively in the progress notes. Essential details such as the time, location, and activity prior to the fall, as well as injury description and treatment, were missing. The facility's fall protocol was not followed, as there was no documentation of a root cause analysis or implementation of new interventions to prevent future falls. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the fall incident. The LPN on duty during the fall did not document the incident in the progress notes and failed to implement or communicate any new interventions. The DON confirmed the absence of a fall report and documentation in the electronic health record. Despite the resident's fall, no new interventions were added, as the DON believed they were unnecessary due to the resident's lack of previous falls.
Failure to Properly Manage Oxygen Tubing for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store, change, and date oxygen tubing for two residents, leading to a deficiency in respiratory care. Resident #4, who was cognitively intact and used oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), had no directive in their care plan to change or date the oxygen tubing. Observations over several days showed the resident using oxygen tubing without any date or initials, and the resident could not recall the last time the tubing was changed. The facility's records, including the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and Physician Order Sheet (POS), did not specify when the oxygen tubing should be changed. Similarly, Resident #39, diagnosed with COPD and using continuous oxygen, also had no directive for changing or dating the oxygen tubing in their care plan. Observations showed the resident using undated and uninitialed oxygen tubing over multiple days. Interviews with staff, including Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed inconsistencies in understanding and executing the responsibility for changing and documenting the oxygen tubing. The facility lacked a policy for changing and dating oxygen tubing, as confirmed by the administrator.
Expired Medications and Testing Supplies Not Removed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that expired testing supplies and medications not in use were destroyed or returned as per facility policy. Specifically, medications for a discharged resident remained in the facility for 182 days after discharge, and expired COVID-19 test kits were not removed or destroyed, remaining in the facility for up to 132 days past expiration. These items were found during an observation of the medication storage room. Additionally, medications labeled for a current resident were found in the storage room without corresponding physician orders since the resident's admission. These included various medications such as atorvastatin, cyclobenzaprine, and sertraline, among others. The LPN interviewed was unaware of why these medications were in the cabinet, how long they had been there, or who placed them there. It was noted that sometimes families brought medications from home, which the facility could not use, and these were supposed to be taken back by the family. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged responsibility for checking the medication storage room but admitted the last check was two weeks prior. The DON was unaware of the presence of expired COVID-19 tests and medications for the residents in question. The DON stated that expired medications should be placed in a destruction container, and anyone noticing outdated COVID-19 tests could dispose of them. However, these procedures were not followed, leading to the deficiency.
Ineffective Pest Control Program Leads to Roach Infestation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by the presence of roaches in the kitchen and dishwashing areas. Observations revealed light brown insects crawling along the walls and floors near heated carts, trash cans, and kitchen equipment. The facility's pest control policy, revised in May 2024, mandates an ongoing program to keep the building free of insects and rodents, with services provided by a pest control vendor. However, the pest control company's service summary report from December 2024 only indicated treatment of the facility's exterior for rodents and ants, with no recent interior treatment noted. Interviews with the Dietary Supervisor and Administrator revealed a lack of timely response to pest sightings. The Dietary Supervisor acknowledged a report of a roach in the service hallway on January 11, 2025, but did not act on it as it was not in the kitchen. The pest control company was contacted on January 13, 2025, but a billing issue delayed their response. The Administrator was unaware of the current insect issues in the kitchen until informed by the Dietary Supervisor. The pest control technician confirmed an ongoing issue with roaches, although the volume had decreased, and stated that healthcare facilities are prioritized for pest control services.
Failure to Assess and Document Bed Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly assess and document the use of bed rails for a resident, leading to a deficiency. The facility did not assess the resident for risk of entrapment prior to the placement of bed rails, nor did they document any alternatives attempted before deciding to use bed rails. Additionally, the facility did not complete entrapment zone measurements or obtain written consent from the resident or their guardian before the use of the bed rails. The resident involved had a history of falls, unsteadiness on feet, and required substantial assistance for mobility. The resident's care plan indicated the use of half side rails to maximize independence with turning and repositioning in bed. However, there was no physician's order for the bed rails, and the resident's medical record lacked a bed rail assessment, entrapment assessment, or informed consent documentation. During an interview, the Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of necessary orders, assessments, consents, or entrapment zone measurements for the resident's bed rail. Despite considering the removal of all bed rails, the facility and the resident decided it was in the resident's best interest to keep the bed rail. This decision was made without the proper documentation and assessments required by the facility's policies.
Failure to Conduct Bed Rail Safety Inspections
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct regular inspections of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, which are crucial for identifying potential entrapment hazards. This deficiency was observed in the case of a resident who used a half bed rail for assistance with mobility. The facility's policies required routine inspections and assessments to ensure the safe use of bed rails, but these were not completed. The Maintenance Director, who was responsible for these inspections, was unaware of his duties regarding measuring bed rails for entrapment zones and had not conducted any such assessments since his employment began three months prior. The resident involved had a history of falls and required substantial assistance with mobility due to a recent shoulder fracture. Despite the resident's reliance on the bed rail for safety and mobility, there was no documented assessment, physician order, or informed consent for the use of the bed rail. Interviews with the Maintenance Director and the Director of Nursing revealed a lack of awareness and execution of the necessary safety checks and documentation, contributing to the oversight in ensuring the resident's safety.
Failure to Provide Written Transfer Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notices of transfer to residents and/or their representatives when six residents were transferred to the hospital. This deficiency was identified during a review of 14 sampled residents, where it was found that the facility did not adhere to its own Transfer or Discharge Notice policy. The policy requires that written notice be given as soon as practicable before a transfer or discharge, including details such as the reason for transfer, effective date, location, and appeal rights. However, in these cases, there was no evidence that such notices were provided. For instance, Resident #29 was transferred to the hospital twice, on two separate occasions, due to medical complaints, but there was no documentation of a written notice being provided to the resident's representative. Similarly, Resident #16 was transferred to the hospital with a pulmonary embolism, and Resident #11 was transferred following a fall and subsequent shoulder fracture, yet neither had written notices documented in their medical records. These omissions were consistent across other residents, including Resident #35, who was transferred due to swelling and respiratory issues, and Resident #251, who was transferred due to symptoms related to congestive heart failure. The facility's failure to provide written notices was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator, who acknowledged that the nurses were not sending transfer notices with the residents or providing them to the representatives upon transfer. This oversight indicates a systemic issue in the facility's process for handling transfers and discharges, as evidenced by the lack of documentation in the medical records of the affected residents.
Failure to Provide Bed Hold Policy Notification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a written notice of the bed hold policy to residents or their representatives within 24 hours of transfer to a hospital, affecting four residents out of a sample of 14. The facility's policy requires that when a resident is transferred to a hospital, the bed hold policy must be communicated in writing to the resident or their representative. However, in the cases of Residents #11, #16, #35, and #251, there was no evidence that this policy was provided as required. Resident #16 was transferred to the hospital due to elevated fever, decreased oxygen saturation, and increased respiratory effort, and was diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism. Resident #11 was transferred after a fall resulted in a right shoulder fracture. Resident #35 was sent to the hospital with symptoms including periorbital edema, confusion, and shortness of breath. Resident #251, who was their own responsible party, was transferred due to breathing difficulties and suspected weight gain. In all these cases, the facility did not provide the required bed hold policy documentation. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the Admission Director contacted residents or their representatives by phone to discuss the bed hold policy but did not document these discussions. The Administrator acknowledged that the nurses were supposed to provide the bed hold policy upon transfer, but this was not being done. This lack of documentation and communication led to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 643 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near O Fallon
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbey Senior Health | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Delmar Gardens Of O'fallon | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Sunterra Springs Dardenne Prairie | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| St Peters Post Acute | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Ignite Medical Resort St Peters | 4.2 mi | — | 23 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Garden View Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.