Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Of during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Three residents experienced deficiencies in medical record documentation, including missing consent forms for certain medications, discharge summaries that were copied from admission orders rather than reflecting the actual stay, and incomplete transfer documentation lacking communication of key information and bed hold policy details.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions experienced several changes in condition and treatment, including new medications, illness, and interventions, without documented notification to the responsible party. The guardian reported not being consistently informed, and EMR review confirmed a lack of documentation regarding notification for significant events and care changes.
Two residents did not have their care plans properly reviewed, revised, or implemented. One resident with muscular dystrophy and dysphagia did not have a required floor mat in place after a fall and was observed eating unsupervised in bed despite care plan instructions. Another resident with traumatic brain dysfunction lacked an updated communication plan, had no communication board available, and there was no documentation of required monitoring.
Two residents did not receive medications according to professional standards: one with dysphagia had medications left at bedside without observation despite not being cleared for self-administration, and another with COPD was not instructed to rinse and spit after using an inhaler as ordered. Facility staff did not follow established medication administration policies.
The facility did not ensure insulin was administered according to provider orders and failed to monitor and report abnormal blood sugar results for three residents with diabetes. Insulin was given outside of ordered parameters without documented rationale, high blood sugar readings were not reported to the provider as required, and daily blood sugar checks were not consistently performed or documented, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with Obstructive Sleep Apnea did not receive proper care for their CPAP device, as the mask was not stored in a bag and the filter was moderately soiled on multiple observations. The resident reported that staff had not cleaned the device in a long time, and records did not consistently reflect required maintenance, despite facility policy mandating daily cleaning and proper storage.
The facility did not ensure proper dispensing and documentation of controlled medications for three residents. Controlled substances were dispensed without corresponding documentation of administration, and in some cases, medications were dispensed without an active order or without proper recordkeeping in the MAR or electronic medical record. These actions were not in accordance with facility policy requiring accurate accountability for controlled substances.
Two residents received incorrect medication dosages when an LPN administered double the prescribed amount of vitamin D3 to one resident, and two nurses gave twice the ordered dose of morphine sulfate to another resident. These errors resulted in a medication error rate of 6.66%, exceeding the acceptable threshold, and occurred despite facility policy requiring verification of the correct dosage and review of the MAR.
Surveyors found that a discus inhaler and a nasal spray were not labeled with a resident's name, even though their boxes were labeled. Nursing staff confirmed that medications should be labeled to ensure correct administration and identification if separated from their packaging.
The facility did not complete annual performance reviews for nurse aides or provide regular in-service education based on those reviews. Review of staff files showed that at least two CNAs had not received required evaluations or consistent ongoing training, and the administrator confirmed that performance reviews had been put on hold by HR, resulting in non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
Surveyors identified that two residents' rooms and adjacent hallways had persistent urine odors due to inadequate cleaning and improper management of incontinence and urinal disposal. Staff and resident council feedback confirmed that toilets and urinals were not consistently cleaned, resulting in unclean and uncomfortable conditions.
A resident with dementia and weakness was not provided with an appropriately sized drinking cup, despite repeated requests from her family and clear instructions in her care plan. The facility failed to consistently offer a smaller, manageable cup, raising concerns about the resident's hydration.
A resident reported her cell phone and money missing shortly after admission, but the facility failed to investigate or report the allegations to the state survey agency. Despite the resident's reports to staff and administration, no concern forms or incident reports were filed, and the Nursing Home Administrator was unaware of the situation until informed by a surveyor. The facility did not comply with its policy requiring immediate reporting of such allegations.
A resident with multiple sclerosis and cognitive deficits did not receive adequate oral care or assistance with mobility as per their care plan. The resident's guardian reported infrequent oral care and lack of use of an oral moisturizer gel. Observations confirmed the resident's mouth was often dry with secretions. CNAs admitted to providing oral care less frequently than required, and the resident was not regularly assisted into his wheelchair, contrary to his care plan.
The facility failed to provide meaningful activities for two residents with dementia, as observed during a survey. One resident was observed sleeping during the day, with no activities documented in the past 30 days, despite a care plan goal for one-on-one activities. Another resident also lacked documented activities, with a family member expressing concern about the absence of engagement when they were not present.
A resident with multiple sclerosis and contractures was not provided with necessary hand splints as required. Observations revealed the resident without splints, and staff were unaware of the splint schedule. Documentation showed inconsistencies, and no physician orders for splints were found, leading to a deficiency in care.
The facility failed to manage medications properly, with expired medications found in the Northwest Medication Cart and the Southwest Medication Cart left unlocked and unattended. Staff interviews confirmed that medication carts should be locked when not in use, but this protocol was not consistently followed.
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality of medical records for two residents, as their e-MARs were left open and unattended on a medication cart, visible to passersby. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's policy requiring screens to be closed when not attended, in compliance with HIPAA regulations.
The facility failed to provide collaborative hospice care for two residents. Staff were unaware of hospice schedules and lacked documentation of services provided. One resident, with Parkinson's and failure to thrive, was in distress and preferred hospice for showers, which were not documented. Another resident, with dementia and weight loss, had no recent hospice visits documented, and her sleep patterns were not communicated to hospice.
The facility failed to clean a glucometer per manufacturer's instructions, risking infection spread. Two residents had their blood glucose levels checked with a glucometer cleaned inadequately using 70% isopropyl alcohol prep pads instead of EPA-approved disinfecting wipes. Staff interviews revealed confusion about proper cleaning protocols, with some using alcohol pads despite guidelines requiring specific germicidal wipes.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Medical Record Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for three residents, resulting in deficiencies related to documentation and safeguarding of resident-identifiable information. For one resident with multiple psychiatric diagnoses, the medical record did not contain documentation that the resident was informed in advance about the risks, benefits, and alternatives for certain prescribed medications, specifically Benztropine Mesylate and Bupropion, prior to administration. Although the facility had obtained consent for other antipsychotic medications, there was no evidence of consent for these two medications in the resident's record. Another resident, admitted following elective spinal surgery, had discharge documentation that included a summary of their stay. However, the nursing summary was found to be a direct copy-and-paste from a physician order regarding the reason for admission, rather than a true summary of the resident's stay at the facility. The nurse manager confirmed this practice, stating it was standard procedure to copy the admission order into the discharge summary, rather than providing an individualized account of the resident's progress and care during their stay. A third resident, who was cognitively intact and admitted with quadriplegia, was transferred to the hospital following a change in condition. The medical record lacked documentation that pertinent information about the resident's condition was communicated to the receiving hospital, and there was no record that the resident was informed about the facility's bed hold policy. Additionally, the required Interact transfer form was not completed or entered into the medical record for this transfer event. A late entry was made in the progress notes to indicate the hospital was notified, but it still did not include information regarding the bed hold policy.
Failure to Notify Responsible Party of Resident Condition Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the responsible party of changes in condition and treatment for one resident who was admitted with traumatic brain dysfunction, aphasia, and hemiplegia, and was documented as severely cognitively impaired. The resident's guardian, listed as the primary contact, reported not being consistently informed of changes in the resident's status or care, including illness, medication changes, and new treatments. The guardian stated that she only learned of the resident's pneumonia and antibiotic treatment after proactively contacting the facility herself. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed multiple instances where significant changes in the resident's condition or treatment were not communicated to the guardian. These included new medication orders, medication changes, catheterization for a urine specimen, respiratory changes requiring new interventions, gradual dose reduction and discontinuation of psychotropic medication, initiation of treatment for an open skin area, and ongoing weight loss. In each case, there was no documentation that the guardian had been notified. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of documentation and indicated a review would be conducted, but as of the survey exit, no evidence was provided that the guardian had been informed of these matters.
Failure to Review, Revise, and Implement Care Plans for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed, revised, and implemented for two residents. For one resident with muscular dystrophy and dysphagia, the care plan did not include a newly ordered intervention of a floor mat after a fall, and the mat was observed not to be in place at the bedside as required. Additionally, this resident's nutrition care plan required supervised dining in specific areas, but she was repeatedly observed eating unsupervised in her bed, contrary to the documented interventions. For another resident with traumatic brain dysfunction and significant cognitive impairment, the care plan addressing communication difficulties had not been updated with new interventions since 2020. The care plan called for the use of a communication board and monitoring of frustration levels, but no communication board was found in the resident's room, and there was no documentation of monitoring in the medical record. Staff reported ongoing difficulty understanding the resident, and the resident indicated he did not have or know about a communication board.
Failure to Follow Professional Standards in Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice in the administration of medications for two residents. For one resident with a diagnosis of muscular dystrophy and dysphagia, the care plan did not include any entry permitting self-administration of medications, and the most recent evaluation for self-administration was completed prior to the diagnosis of dysphagia. Despite this, staff routinely left a cup of medications on the resident's tray table, allowing her to take them at her own pace without direct observation. Facility staff confirmed that, due to the resident's dysphagia, medications should not have been left unattended and should have been administered under direct observation to ensure safety. For another resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a registered nurse prepared and administered morning medications, including a Breztri Aerosphere inhaler, which had specific instructions to rinse and expectorate after use. The nurse handed the inhaler to the resident, who self-administered it, but did not instruct or observe the resident to rinse her mouth as directed. When questioned, the nurse was unaware of the requirement to rinse and did not consult the medication administration record or provide further clarification. Facility policies required that medications be administered as ordered, in accordance with professional standards and manufacturer specifications, and that staff refer to drug reference materials if unfamiliar with a medication. In both cases, the facility did not adhere to its own policies or professional standards, resulting in deficiencies in medication administration practices for the two residents.
Failure to Follow Insulin Administration Orders and Blood Sugar Monitoring Protocols
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders and residents' needs in the administration and monitoring of insulin for three residents. For one resident with muscular dystrophy and diabetes, insulin was administered even when blood sugar levels were below the ordered threshold, and there was no documentation explaining the rationale for giving insulin outside of the prescribed parameters. Another resident with type 1 diabetes had multiple instances of extremely high blood sugar readings, but there was no documentation that the provider was notified as required by the physician's order. The facility's staff confirmed that there was no record of provider notification or new orders in response to these abnormal results. Additionally, a third resident with type 2 diabetes did not have blood sugar assessments completed on several days, despite documentation on the medication administration record indicating otherwise. There was no evidence in the electronic medical record that the assessments were performed or any rationale provided for missing the assessments. The facility's policy requires that vital signs be obtained and recorded per physician orders and that medications be held if parameters are not met, but these procedures were not followed in the cases reviewed.
Failure to Provide Proper CPAP Device Care and Maintenance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide proper care and maintenance of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device for a resident diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. The resident was observed on two separate occasions with a CPAP device that was not in use, and the mask was not stored in a bag as required by facility policy. The CPAP filter was found to be moderately soiled during both observations, and the resident reported that staff had not cleaned the device in a long time. The resident also indicated that the storage bag provided by the facility was the same one given years prior, and staff did not check daily for proper storage or cleaning of the device. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and electronic medical record (EMR) tasks for the previous thirty days showed inconsistent documentation regarding the cleaning and maintenance of the CPAP device. While documentation alleged that the mask was cleaned once or twice daily and the filter was cleaned or changed weekly, direct observation contradicted these records, as the filter remained soiled and the mask was not properly stored. Facility policy required daily cleaning of the mask, weekly cleaning of the filter, and monthly replacement of the storage bag, none of which were consistently followed for this resident.
Failure to Properly Dispense and Document Controlled Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper dispensing and documentation of controlled medications for three residents. For one resident with osteoporosis, tramadol was documented as dispensed on several dates, but the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed it was not administered, and there was no documentation explaining the discrepancy. On another date, the MAR indicated the medication was administered, but there was no corresponding record of it being dispensed. The Director of Nursing confirmed a documentation error regarding the administration and disposal of the medication. Another resident with an anxiety disorder received a dose of alprazolam that was dispensed without an active physician order, and there was no documentation in the MAR or electronic medical record to support the administration or the existence of a one-time verbal order. For a third resident with anxiety disorder, lorazepam was dispensed on multiple occasions, but the MAR and electronic medical record lacked documentation of its administration. The facility's policy requires accurate accountability and documentation for all controlled substances, including when doses are administered, refused, or destroyed, but these procedures were not followed in the cited cases.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds 5% Due to Incorrect Dosages
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, resulting in a rate of 6.66% during the observed medication administration task. For one resident with a diagnosis including vitamin D deficiency, an LPN administered 2000 IU of cholecalciferol instead of the prescribed 1000 IU. This error was identified through observation and review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), which confirmed the incorrect dosage was given. Another resident with chronic pain syndrome, back spasm, and neuropathy received 40 mg of morphine sulfate oral solution on multiple occasions, despite the MAR indicating a prescribed dose of 20 mg. Both an RN and another nurse administered the higher dose, and the Controlled Substance Proof-Of-Use Record corroborated the administration of the incorrect amount. The facility's medication administration policy requires adherence to the six rights of medication administration, including the right dosage and review of the MAR, which was not followed in these instances.
Failure to Properly Label Medications in Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
During an inspection of the Northeast/Northwest Split Medication Cart, surveyors observed that certain medications were not properly labeled in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, an Incruse Ellipta discus and a Fluticasone propionate nasal spray, both stored in boxes labeled with a resident's name, were found without any resident identifying information on the actual medication containers themselves. Licensed nursing staff confirmed during interviews that these items should be labeled with the resident's name to ensure correct administration and to identify ownership if the medications become separated from their boxes.
Failure to Complete Annual Performance Reviews and Provide Regular In-Service Education for Nurse Aides
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and did not provide regular in-service education based on the outcomes of these reviews. Review of the facility's assessment indicated that while there was an orientation process and ongoing training plan in place, actual implementation was lacking. Specifically, review of employee files showed that one CNA, hired in December 2023, had no performance evaluations completed since hire, and only minimal education was documented, with a significant gap in ongoing training. Another CNA, hired in October 2022, also had no performance evaluations completed for 2023 or 2024. During an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that performance evaluations had not been conducted in 2024 due to a hold placed by the HR department to streamline the process, and was unsure if evaluations had been completed in 2023. The administrator stated that yearly education was provided through a computerized training program, bi-monthly meetings, and a yearly skills assessment/in-service, but documentation reviewed did not support that regular in-service education or performance reviews were consistently completed as required.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Odor-Free Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and odor-free environment for two residents with environmental concerns. Observations revealed a persistent and strong smell of urine in the hallways and specific resident rooms, particularly around the Nurse's Station and in the rooms of two residents. One resident, who was occasionally incontinent and had vision problems, frequently urinated on and around the toilet, resulting in wet floors. Staff reported that it was common for the bathroom floor to be wet with urine and that housekeeping was often called to clean up. Another resident, who used urinals at the bedside due to medical conditions, was observed to have multiple urinals, some full and some empty, left on the floor and on a wastebasket in the room. The smell of urine was consistently noted in this resident's room during multiple observations. Resident Council Meeting Minutes further documented ongoing concerns from residents about inadequate cleaning of toilets and careless dumping of bedpans and urinals, leading to messy and unclean conditions. These findings were corroborated by both staff interviews and direct observations, indicating a pattern of insufficient cleaning and maintenance of resident areas, particularly in relation to the management of incontinence and urinal disposal.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Drinking Cup for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs of a resident by not providing an appropriately sized drinking cup. The resident, who has dementia, anxiety disorder, weakness, and aphasia, was observed with a large plastic mug that she could not lift due to her lack of strength. Despite repeated requests from the resident's family member during care conferences and direct communication with staff, the facility only temporarily provided a suitable Styrofoam cup. The resident's care plan explicitly stated the need for smaller cups, yet this was not consistently adhered to, leading to concerns about potential dehydration, especially during the family member's absence.
Failure to Investigate and Report Alleged Misappropriation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of misappropriation involving a resident's missing cell phone and money to the state survey agency. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported that her cell phone and a baggy with quarters went missing shortly after her admission. Despite the resident's reports to various staff members, including floor staff, the social worker, and administration, there was no documentation of any concern forms or incident reports being filed regarding her allegations. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was unaware of the resident's allegations until informed by the surveyor. Upon learning of the situation, the NHA planned to fill out a concern form and search for the missing items. However, the facility did not report the allegations to the state survey agency within the required timeframe, nor did they provide documentation of an initiated investigation by the time of the survey's completion. This inaction was contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates immediate reporting of such allegations.
Inadequate Oral Care and Mobility Assistance for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate oral care for a resident with multiple sclerosis, cognitive communication deficit, and contractures. The resident's guardian reported that oral care was not being performed regularly, and the staff were not using the oral moisturizer gel provided to keep the resident's mouth moist. Observations confirmed that the resident's mouth was often dry with caked secretions, indicating a lack of routine oral care. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) admitted to providing oral care less frequently than required, with one CNA stating she attempted oral care once a day, despite the resident's care plan indicating the need for oral care every two hours. Additionally, the resident was not being assisted to get out of bed and into his electric wheelchair as desired, which was another concern raised by the guardian. The resident's care plan specified that he should be in his wheelchair twice a day, but this was not consistently happening. The Unit Manager confirmed that staff training for oral care was provided, and residents were expected to receive oral care at least every two hours, which was not being adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Meaningful Activities for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide meaningful activities for two residents, R7 and R16, as observed during a survey. R7, a female resident with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder, was observed sleeping during the day on multiple occasions. Interviews with CNAs revealed that R7 typically sleeps all day and is most alert at night, but the Activity Director (AD) was unaware of this routine and had no documentation of activities provided to R7 in the past 30 days. R7's care plan indicated a goal of participating in one-on-one activities three times a week, but there was no evidence of this being implemented. Similarly, R16, another female resident with dementia and anxiety disorder, was observed sleeping in bed, and the AD confirmed that there was no documentation of activities provided to her in the last 30 days. R16's care plan included participation in group activities like arts and crafts and bingo, but due to a shortage of volunteers, these activities were not provided. A family member expressed concern about the lack of activities for R16, especially when they were not present to engage with her.
Failure to Apply Hand Splints for Resident with Contractures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with contractures by not applying hand splints as required. The resident, who has multiple sclerosis, cognitive communication deficit, and contractures, was observed multiple times without the necessary hand splints. The resident's guardian reported that the splints were not being worn anymore and when they were, they were not applied correctly, causing discomfort. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were observed not applying the splints, and some were unaware of the schedule for splint application. The splints were found in the resident's dresser drawer, indicating they were not being used as per the care plan. Documentation inconsistencies were noted, with the Splints On? Task List showing discrepancies in the recorded times the splints were supposedly on. The Kardex indicated a schedule of 3 hours on and 2 hours off for the splints, but this was not adhered to, and there were no physician orders for the splints. Interviews with staff, including the Physical Therapy Director and the Unit Manager, confirmed the resident was supposed to have a schedule for splint application, but this was not being followed, leading to the deficiency.
Medication Management Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that expired medications were not present in one of the two medication carts inspected, specifically the Northwest Medication Cart. During an inspection with an LPN and the DON, it was observed that an opened bottle of Senna Syrup had an expiration date of January 2024, and an opened bottle of a multivitamin had an expiration date of March 2024. Both the LPN and the DON verified these findings, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to medication management protocols. Additionally, the facility did not secure one of the four medication carts, the Southwest Medication Cart, which was found unlocked and unattended in the hallway. RN E, responsible for this cart, admitted to leaving it unlocked while administering medications two rooms away, despite not being able to see the cart from the resident's room. Interviews with other nursing staff, including LPN F, RN B, and LPN D, confirmed that the standard procedure is to lock medication carts when unattended to secure the medications. However, it was noted that LPN D had also left her cart unlocked twice that morning, further highlighting the facility's failure to comply with its own medication storage policy.
Failure to Safeguard Resident Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to safeguard the confidentiality of medical records for two residents, resulting in the potential for unauthorized access to their personal health information. During an observation, the computer screen on the Southwest Medication Cart was left open, displaying a resident's electronic Medication Administration Record (e-MAR) with personal and health identifying information visible to anyone passing by. The nurse responsible for the cart was not present, and when interviewed, she did not perceive an issue with leaving the screen open, despite being unable to see the cart from her location. Another observation revealed a similar situation with a different resident's e-MAR left open on the same medication cart. Interviews with other nursing staff confirmed that the facility's policy requires computer screens to be closed when not attended, to protect residents' health information in compliance with HIPAA regulations. Despite this policy, one nurse admitted to leaving her screen open twice that morning, acknowledging the breach of protocol. The facility's HIPAA Security Measures policy emphasizes the importance of protecting electronic protected health information (EPHI) by restricting access to workstations.
Failure to Provide Collaborative Hospice Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide collaborative hospice care for two residents, R4 and R7, who were under hospice care. For R4, the facility staff, including a registered nurse and certified nurse aides, were unaware of the last time hospice staff provided services or when they were scheduled to see R4 again. There was no documentation or schedule available at the nursing station, and the last hospice progress note in R4's electronic medical record was dated over a week prior. R4 was observed in a state of distress, having vomited on herself, and preferred hospice staff for her showers, which had not been documented as provided. For R7, the facility staff, including certified nurse aides and a social worker, were unable to verify the hospice schedule or confirm that hospice was aware of R7's sleep patterns, which involved sleeping during the day and being awake at night. The last hospice progress note for R7 was dated nearly two weeks prior, and there was no indication of hospice services being provided since then. R7 had a history of significant weight loss, refusal of meals, and increased sleep, with no recent changes in her care plan to address these issues.
Improper Cleaning of Glucometer Leads to Infection Risk
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly clean a glucometer according to the manufacturer's instructions, which led to a potential risk of infection spread among residents. Observations revealed that two residents, one with diabetes and another with dementia, had their blood glucose levels checked using a glucometer that was cleaned inadequately. Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) were seen using 70% isopropyl alcohol prep pads to quickly swipe the glucometer, contrary to the manufacturer's guidelines that require specific EPA-approved disinfecting wipes containing bleach or a combination of germicidal ingredients. Interviews with staff, including LPNs and a Registered Nurse (RN), indicated a misunderstanding or lack of adherence to the proper cleaning protocol. Some staff believed that alcohol pads were sufficient for cleaning, while others acknowledged that only specific germicidal wipes should be used. The facility's policy and the manufacturer's instructions both emphasize the need for using appropriate disinfectants and ensuring the correct contact time to effectively sanitize the equipment. The improper cleaning practices observed could lead to the spread of infections, as the glucometer is a shared device among residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 16 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Big Rapids
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Orchards At Big Rapids | 0.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Corewell Health Reed City Hospital Rehabilitation | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Grand Oaks Nursing Center | 22.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Newaygo Co Medical Care Facility | 26.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Regency At Fremont | 26.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Of.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.