Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Corewell Health Reed City Hospital Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Kitchen and dining service equipment were observed in unsanitary condition, including a hand sink missing proper signage, dirty maintenance tools stored near the sink, a can opener blade with black sticky buildup, slime on the ice machine shield, and grime on the prep cooler. Staff were also using wiping cloth towels as potholders near the stove, and the dining room ice/water dispenser and coffee machine had mold, scale, and debris buildup. The NHA said the dining room machines had been requested for cleaning weeks earlier, but the observed buildup showed they had not been cleaned in some time.
The facility failed to ensure safe transfers for two residents and failed to increase supervision for a resident with repeated falls. One resident with dementia and other diagnoses was pushed in a wheelchair without footrests, and a CNA acknowledged the footrests should have been used. Another resident requiring assistance with ambulation was transferred from the toilet to a wheelchair without a gait belt, despite staff stating gait belts were required. A third resident with dementia, poor safety awareness, and a history of falls had multiple falls in her room, but the facility did not add increased supervision during awake time and had only documented toileting and room-equipment changes.
A resident with multiple health issues was observed receiving medications, but discrepancies were found between the observed administration and the documented times in the MAR. RN A administered medications at times not recorded accurately and gave an incorrect dose of metoprolol. The DON confirmed the need for accurate documentation as per the facility's policy.
Kitchen and Dining Equipment Not Kept Clean and Sanitary
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain kitchen and dining equipment and fixtures in a clean, sanitary condition and in proper working order. During the initial kitchen tour, the cook line hand sink was observed without the proper handwashing signage, and dirty dustpan and broom equipment were being stored on hangers/clips on the wall adjacent to and level with the hand sink basin. The report also noted that kitchen staff were using wiping cloth towels as potholders when moving pots, pans, and sheet pans to and from the oven and stove, and the towels were thin with loose threads hanging. During this observation, a kitchen employee stated that the facility was now using wiping cloth towels as potholders because they had been told that is what real kitchens do. Additional observations showed unsanitary conditions on food service equipment. The can opener blade and the drip line of the housing unit beneath it had a build-up of a black sticky substance. The ice machine inside the kitchen had a pinkish-orange slime on the ice deflector shield. The cook line prep cooler had a build-up of food residues, debris, and grime on the doors, door seals, opening, and bottom of the unit. The ice machine area also had a tag labeled "New Filter" hanging from the water filter, with dates showing the filter had been replaced on 3/22/24 and 6/11/24, and no current dates were observed. The water filter for the coffee and juice machine area reflected a date of 6/23. During a later observation in a long-term care dining room, the ice/water dispensing machine had an accumulation of mold and hard water scale build-up, and grime and debris were built up on the coffee machine. The NHA stated that she had requested the ice/water dispenser and coffee machine in the dining room be cleaned around the end of October, but the amount of build-up observed indicated they had not been cleaned in some time.
Unsafe Transfers and Inadequate Fall Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe transfers for two residents and failed to implement meaningful interventions and increased supervision to prevent falls for one resident. One resident, who had chronic low back pain, stroke, dementia, and numbness and tingling of the left leg, was observed being pushed in a wheelchair without footrests in place. The resident appeared uncomfortable and was trying to hold her feet off the floor while being pushed by a CNA. When questioned, the CNA acknowledged that the wheelchair should not have been pushed without footrests and had to retrieve them from the resident’s room. Another resident, who had generalized weakness, alcohol abuse, and cognitive impairment, required assistance with ambulation. During an observation, a CNA assisted the resident from the toilet to the wheelchair without using a gait belt, even though the CNA stated gait belt use was required for all residents needing assistance with ambulation. The CNA said she did not use the gait belt because the resident was in a good mood. The resident stated that staff do not always use a gait belt when assisting him, and another CNA confirmed that residents requiring assistance with ambulation require a gait belt. A third resident with dementia, impaired safety awareness, impaired gait, and a history of falls had 11 falls in her room over the review period. Her care plans identified fall risk and multiple issues including poor safety awareness, impulsiveness, and refusal of some care, but the interventions documented after each fall focused on toileting schedule changes and room equipment adjustments. The facility confirmed that all of the falls occurred in the resident’s room, that no increased supervision during awake time had been implemented, and that the resident stayed in her room most of the time. The facility also confirmed it did not offer a lower-stimulating activity program for residents with advanced dementia who were impulsive and had short attention spans.
Inaccurate Medication Administration Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document medication administration times for a resident, identified as R2, during a medication administration observation. R2, a resident with multiple diagnoses including osteoarthritis, neuropathic pain, and chronic pain syndrome, was observed receiving several medications from RN A. However, discrepancies were noted between the observed administration and the documentation in R2's Medication Administration Record (MAR). Specifically, medications such as Voltaren gel, Flonase nasal spray, and a potassium chloride packet were documented as administered at times that did not align with the surveyor's observations. Additionally, there was a discrepancy in the dosage of metoprolol administered, as RN A gave a 25 mg dose despite the physician's order for a 50 mg dose. During interviews, RN A acknowledged administering some medications after the observation period and admitted to not remembering the exact dose of metoprolol given. The Director of Nursing confirmed that RN A should have documented the actual times the medications were administered, rather than the incorrect times noted in the MAR. The facility's Medication Management policy emphasizes the importance of accurate documentation, which was not adhered to in this instance, leading to the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 7 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Reed City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Orchards At Big Rapids | 11.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Of | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Grand Oaks Nursing Center | 16.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Wexford Senior Care Center | 25.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Autumnwood Of Mcbain | 26.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Corewell Health Reed City Hospital Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.