Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Jackson County Medical Care Facility during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Food storage and handling deficiencies were observed when expired soup and green beans were found in the walk-in refrigerator, multiple cups of cream cheese and whipped spread lacked expiration dates, and dietary staff handled salad, soup, and bread with bare hands without hand hygiene. A dietary staff member also inserted a digital thermometer into potato soup without disinfecting it first, and lunch items on the 200 hall were recorded at temperatures including salad at 55 degrees F and chopped salad at 50 degrees F.
A facility failed to treat residents with dignity when staff used a baby monitor-like device in one resident’s shared room despite her dislike of it, with conversations and medication discussions audible in the hallway and no documented consent from the roommate’s family. In another instance, a hospice RN performed a resident’s assessment and vital signs in the dining room while she was eating, in view and hearing of other residents, and the resident stopped eating during the encounter.
Survey Results Not Readily Accessible to Residents and Families: Residents stated they did not know the results of any surveys or where to find the survey binder, and no survey binder was located in the main or common areas for access. A State Binder at the front desk did not contain the most current survey results, although an LNA's assistant later stated the latest survey had been added to the binder.
A facility failed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of two residents sharing a room when a baby-monitor-type device was used to hear one resident call out for help. Staff confirmed the resident did not like the device, no other call light options were tried, and the monitor allowed private conversations and medication discussions to be heard in the hallway. The roommate’s family had not given permission, and there was no signage alerting visitors to the monitoring device.
A facility failed to provide an effective grievance process when residents reported that grievance forms were not readily accessible in common areas and that they did not know they could complete them themselves or ask for help. Residents also described ongoing unresolved concerns, including long call light wait times, staff turning off call lights without providing care, missing clothing, and other care and service issues. Record review showed these concerns from Resident Council meetings were not identified or documented as grievances, and interviews showed inconsistent staff knowledge of where grievance forms were kept.
Failure to Refer Resident for PASARR Change in Condition Screening: A resident with severe cognitive impairment developed new diagnoses including hallucinations, delusional disorder, and Alzheimer's Disease during the stay, and was started on Seroquel for hallucinations. Although the initial PASARR Level I screening had all No responses, no Change in Condition Level I screening or referral to the local CMHSP was completed after the resident’s condition changed.
An unsecured grey tote containing returned meds and a medication inventory record was observed sitting on a couch outside a public restroom on a unit with no authorized staff supervising it. The tote contained Flexeril, Lovenox, and Singulair, and an LPN said this was the usual process for pharmacy returns, while the DON stated returned meds should be kept in the med cart and handed to pharmacy delivery staff.
A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, care planned as a high fall risk requiring two staff for transfers with a stand-up mechanical lift, was transferred by a single CNA who did not review the care plan or Kardex and used a lift she knew had a missing clip. During the bed-to-wheelchair transfer, a buckle/strap on the lift came apart, the resident fell to the floor, and imaging confirmed a right humerus fracture. Staff interviews showed that nurses knew the resident required a two-person transfer, the CNA believed the resident was a one-person transfer based on routine practice, and maintenance later found and replaced missing clips on several lifts without having received prior reports or work orders about the defects. The facility’s internal investigation attributed the event to sling malfunction and did not address the failure to use two staff as required by the resident’s care plan.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity when an LPN was observed having a personal phone conversation on speaker while preparing medications, including insulin, at a medication cart. Two residents were present during this incident, one waiting for her medications and the other seated nearby. The Nursing Unit Manager confirmed that phone use is prohibited in care areas, aligning with the facility's cellphone use policy.
A facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive documentation for a resident with serious health conditions. The resident's medical record contained a DNR order without a completed DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER document, which was found unsigned in the physician's folder. Interviews revealed a breakdown in the process of completing and documenting advance directives, as the document was not signed by the physician before the DNR order was entered into the medical record.
The facility failed to transmit MDS assessments to CMS in a timely manner for three residents. One resident's 5-day MDS was not transmitted by the due date, while another's entry MDS remained in Export Ready status past the due date, and their 5-day MDS was overdue. Additionally, a comprehensive assessment for this resident had not been started. A third resident's admission MDS had an incorrect submit by date. These actions did not comply with RAI guidelines.
A facility failed to complete a PAS/ARR for a resident after a 30-day exemption period. The resident, admitted with major depression and prescribed anti-depressants, had no further screenings or documentation submitted to the State Mental Health Authority. Despite changes in psychotropic medication and a new anxiety diagnosis, required documentation was missing. The Case Manager/Social Service Director confirmed the oversight but could not explain the lapse.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two residents, one with atrial fibrillation on Eliquis and another with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. The absence of care plans for these high-risk conditions was confirmed by the DON and nursing staff, highlighting deficiencies in care management.
A resident with moderately impaired cognition and dependent on staff for personal hygiene was observed with an unkempt beard despite expressing a preference to be shaved. Facility documentation indicated the resident required assistance, but staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in understanding and providing for the resident's preferences, contrary to facility policies.
A resident with Alzheimer's and major depressive disorder was admitted with adequate hearing using hearing aids, but the facility failed to document or provide these devices. Observations and interviews revealed the resident had been without hearing aids for an extended period, affecting her ability to hear and communicate. Staff and family were aware of the issue, but there was no documentation or timely investigation, leading to unmet needs.
A facility failed to justify the continued use of psychotropic medications for a resident who was observed to be pleasant and socially engaging without distressing behaviors. Despite the absence of documented mood concerns, the facility continued the use of Seroquel without adequate justification or documentation of a gradual dose reduction. The resident's psychiatric condition remained unchanged, and the facility did not provide the necessary documentation to support the continued medication use.
Food Storage, Handling, and Thermometer Disinfection Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and handling of food and disinfection of thermometers. On 04/14/2026, the walk-in refrigerator contained cream of mushroom soup labeled with a prep date of 4/7/26 and a use-by date of 4/13/26, and green beans labeled with a prep date of 4/8/26 and a use-by date of 4/13/26. Dietary staff reported the items were past their use-by date and discarded them. On 04/15/2026, the 400 unit refrigerator contained more than twenty individual cups of cream cheese and whipped spread that were not labeled with an expiration date, and dietary staff were unable to locate an expiration date on any of the containers before disposing of them. During meal service, dietary staff were observed handling food without proper hand hygiene and without gloves. One dietary staff member moved from making tossed salad to scooping potato soup and then to touching bread for egg salad sandwiches without hand hygiene, and made several egg salad sandwiches using bare hands without hand hygiene before or after touching the bread. Another dietary staff member placed a digital thermometer directly into potato soup without first disinfecting it, although the thermometer was disinfected between each food item afterward. During lunch on the 200 hall, food temperatures were recorded as salad 55 degrees Fahrenheit, egg salad 40 degrees Fahrenheit, blended egg salad 40 degrees Fahrenheit, and chopped salad 50 degrees Fahrenheit.
Failure to Preserve Resident Dignity During Monitoring and Hospice Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure three residents were treated with respect and dignity. Resident #54 had diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and depression, and the most recent MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment with extensive assistance needed for bed mobility and toileting, total assistance with transfers, and the ability to feed herself and make her needs known. Resident #151 had diagnoses of motor neuron disease, chronic pain, polyosteoarthritis, and difficulty walking, and the most recent MDS showed she was cognitively intact but dependent for bed mobility, toileting, feeding, and transfers using a Hoyer lift. For Resident #151, staff used a baby monitor-like device in her room so they could hear her call out for help. The resident stated she did not like the blow-in call light and did not like the baby monitor either, but staff kept it in place because they needed something to hear her yell out for care. The LPN/unit manager stated no other styles of monitors were tried, the device had been placed in the room because the resident did not like the blow-in type, and the resident did not like the baby monitor at all. The monitor was kept on the medication cart and in the medication room, and staff stated they could hear the resident when she yelled out. The unit manager also confirmed the roommate’s family had not given permission for the device, the roommate may not have been aware of it, and no signage alerted visitors that a monitoring device was being used in the room. The resident’s private conversations and medication discussions could be heard from the hallway, and the facility had no documentation in nursing progress notes or interdisciplinary meeting notes about the monitor or call light options. For Resident #21, who was receiving hospice services for end-of-life care, the hospice RN performed vital signs and other assessment tasks in the dining room while the resident was eating lunch. The RN placed a pulse oximeter on the resident’s finger, took temperature and blood pressure, repeated the blood pressure, and measured the upper arm while other residents were present. The resident stopped eating during the assessment, and the RN remained seated next to her documenting on a tablet. Thirteen other residents were in the dining room, including five at the same table, and could overhear and observe the interaction. The hospice RN stated she tried not to interrupt lunch by taking the resident back to her room, while the DON stated her expectation was that the hospice nurse take the resident to her room for private vital sign assessment because doing it in an open common area was a dignity issue.
Survey Results Not Readily Accessible to Residents and Families
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that survey results were readily accessible to residents and families for review. During a Resident Council Meeting with 10 residents, the survey process was discussed and residents were told that survey results should be available for easy access. Nine of the 10 residents stated they did not know the results of any surveys and did not know where a binder with this information was located. They also stated they wondered about the outcome of the surveys because they never heard anything more after surveyors left the building. On observation, no survey binder could be located in the main or common areas for resident and family access. A later observation found a State Binder at the front reception desk, but after review, the most current survey results were not included for residents or families to review. During interview, LNA's assistant T stated that the last, most current survey was added to the Survey Binder.
Failure to Protect Privacy and Confidentiality in Shared Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain personal privacy and confidentiality of medical information for two residents sharing a room. One resident had Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and depression, with a BIMS score of 11 and extensive assistance needs for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The other resident had motor neuron disease, chronic pain, polyosteoarthritis, difficulty walking, and a BIMS score of 15, and was dependent for bed mobility, toileting, feeding, and transfers using a Hoyer lift. During observations, a baby-monitor-type device was in use in the room and was audible from the hallway and medication cart area. Staff stated the monitor was on all the time and was used so the resident could yell out for help, but the resident stated she did not like the blow-in call light or the baby monitor and did not want it. Staff confirmed the resident was unhappy with the device, that no other call light options had been tried, and that the device had been placed in the room without documentation in nursing progress notes or discussion at interdisciplinary meetings. The monitor allowed staff and others in the hallway to hear private conversations and care-related discussions in the shared room. Observations showed staff discussing medications and asking for the roommate’s date of birth in a manner that could be heard outside the room. Staff also confirmed that the roommate’s family had not given permission for the device, that the roommate may not have been aware it was being used, and that no signage alerted visitors that a monitoring device was present in the room.
Grievance forms not accessible and resident complaints not tracked or resolved
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a process for resident grievances to be resolved, and residents in a council meeting reported that grievance forms were not readily available in common areas or at eye level throughout the facility. Residents stated they had to go to the Social Workers office on their unit to obtain a form, that Social Workers would fill them out, and that they did not know they could complete the forms themselves or ask someone to help them. Residents also stated they did not know the turnaround time for resolution and reported that they were familiar with the Property Incident Report but did not have easy access to Resident Concern/Grievance Forms. During the resident council discussion, residents voiced ongoing concerns about long call light wait times and stated they had reported the issue multiple times without resolution. Residents also reported that staff were turning off call lights without providing care, saying they would be back and not returning. Additional concerns discussed in the meetings included missing clothing, staff being loud during group times, food being overcooked or not prepared as requested, delayed brief changes, colostomy checks not being done on 3rd shift, and personal items being moved or removed from resident rooms. Record review showed that grievances discussed in Resident Council Meetings from November 2025 through April 2026 were not identified or documented as grievances, and there was no grievance form completed to track patterns or resolutions. Interviews with an LPN, SW, LPN/UM, and AD showed inconsistent knowledge of where grievance forms were located, with forms described as being outside a Social Worker’s office, downstairs by the elevator, or in Social Worker offices, but not placed in hallways, dining rooms, or other accessible common areas. The report also states that the grievance policy must notify residents of the right to file grievances orally or in writing, anonymously, and include grievance official contact information, expected time frames, written decisions, and independent entities for filing grievances.
Failure to Refer Resident for PASARR Change in Condition Screening
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to refer one resident to the state-designated authority for a change in condition after the resident developed new mental health and cognitive-related diagnoses during the stay. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hypertension and repeated falls, and the MDS showed severe cognitive impairment on the BIMS. The initial PAS/ARR Level I screening completed before admission answered No to questions about mental illness, dementia, prescribed antipsychotic or antidepressant use, and presenting evidence of mental illness or dementia. During the resident’s stay, visual hallucinations, delusional disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and auditory hallucinations were added to the diagnosis list, and Seroquel was first prescribed for hallucinations. Despite these changes, the resident did not have a Change in Condition Level I Screening or a referral to the local Community Mental Health Services Program. In interviews, the SW stated updated PASARR renewals were given to the SSD to submit, and the SSD stated the resident was due for an update and should have had a Change in Condition Level I Screening completed when dementia was added.
Unsecured Medication Return Tote Left Accessible on Unit
Penalty
Summary
Medications and biologicals were not secured and were left accessible outside of supervised storage. During an observation on 4/15/26 at 3:41 PM, a grey unsecured tote was seen sitting on a couch outside the public restroom on the Renewal Center East unit with no authorized staff supervising it. A non-nurse staff member was in the dining room and another non-nurse staff member walked by while the tote remained unattended. Inside the tote was a Medication Inventory Record listing medications being returned to the pharmacy, including one Metamucil, two Lovenox 40 mg injections, two Flexeril 10 mg, and 47 Singulair 10 mg. The actual medications in the tote included two cards of Flexeril 10 mg for a total of 49 tablets, two Lovenox 10 mg injections, and one Singulair 10 mg tablet. An LPN stated the tote had been left on the couch because medications were being returned to the pharmacy and that this was the usual process, while the DON stated returned medications should be stored in the medication cart and handed off to pharmacy delivery staff when they arrived. The DON confirmed the medications should not have been on the couch.
Neglect During Mechanical Lift Transfer Resulting in Fractured Humerus
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a resident from neglect by not following the resident’s care plan and by using defective equipment during a transfer, resulting in a fall and a fractured right humerus. The resident was an elderly female with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, assessed as high risk for falls. Her comprehensive care plan and Kardex in place at the time specified that she required two staff for transfers using a stand-up mechanical lift. Despite this, on the morning of 12/26/25, a CNA transferred the resident alone from bed to wheelchair using the stand-up lift. During the transfer, the CNA reported hearing a pop sound as the clasp unbuckled and the right strap came off the lift, causing the resident to fall to the floor and complain of right upper extremity pain with visible swelling. A stat x-ray later confirmed a fracture of the surgical neck of the humerus with greater tuberosity extension. The CNA stated she was new, believed the resident to be a one-person transfer based on prior practice, and admitted she did not review the care plan or Kardex because she only checked the Kardex for new residents. She also reported that one of the clips on the right side of the lift was missing, that she had noticed this on a prior date, and that she had used the same lift with the missing clip previously without incident. Interviews and observations further documented that the stand-up lift used in the incident had differing clip types on each side and that maintenance later found several lifts with missing clips/stoppers and replaced them, with no prior work orders or reports about missing clips before the fall. Nursing staff, including the unit manager who conducted the investigation, were aware that the resident was care planned as a two-person transfer with the stand-up lift, but the internal investigation focused on sling buckle malfunction and did not address the use of only one staff member for the transfer. Post-fall assessments by nursing staff and the MDS nurse confirmed that the resident sustained a fracture and experienced a significant change in condition, including increased dependence in ADLs and changes in transfer status, directly associated with the fall during the improperly conducted transfer.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Medication Preparation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect, as observed in the case of two residents. During a medication preparation session, an LPN was observed engaging in a personal phone conversation on speaker while preparing medications, including insulin, at a medication cart. One resident was waiting next to the cart for her medications, while another resident was seated nearby. The LPN abruptly ended the phone conversation after a few minutes. The Nursing Unit Manager later confirmed that staff should not use phones in care areas, particularly during medication preparation. The facility's cellphone use policy, last reviewed in September 2024, prohibits personal device use in resident rooms or while providing direct care, limiting it to designated break areas.
Failure to Ensure Accurate Advance Directive Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive information was in place for a resident admitted with multiple serious health conditions, including end-stage renal disease and congestive heart failure. The resident's medical record showed a physician order for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, but the corresponding DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER document was missing from the medical record. The document was later found in the physician's folder, unsigned by the physician, indicating that the DNR order was prematurely entered into the medical record without the necessary completion of the advance directive process. Interviews with facility staff, including the Unit Manager, Social Worker, and Director of Nursing, revealed a breakdown in the process of completing and documenting advance directives. The Social Worker was responsible for discussing and completing the DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER with the resident, obtaining necessary signatures, and ensuring the document was signed by the physician before being scanned into the medical record. However, the document was not signed by the physician, and the DNR order was entered into the medical record without the completed document, highlighting a failure in the facility's protocol for handling advance directives.
Failure to Transmit MDS Assessments Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) system. Resident #470 had an entry MDS transmitted and accepted, but the 5-day MDS completed on 1/20/2025 was not transmitted by the due date of 1/21/2025. Additionally, the admission MDS was ready for export on 1/20/2025 but had not been completed or transmitted by the review date of 1/24/2025. Resident #472's entry MDS was due on 1/10/2025 but remained in Export Ready status as of 1/23/2025, with the actual completion date noted as 1/17/2025. The 5-day MDS for this resident was in progress and overdue by six days as of 1/23/2025. Furthermore, a comprehensive assessment due by 1/23/2025 had not been started. Resident #477's admission MDS was completed on 1/23/2025, but the submit by date was incorrectly noted as 2/6/2025, instead of the correct date of 1/23/2025. These deficiencies indicate a failure to adhere to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidelines, which require timely completion and transmission of assessments.
Failure to Complete PAS/ARR After 30-Day Exemption
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission/Annual Resident Review (PAS/ARR) was completed for a resident after the 30-day exemption period. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of major depression and was prescribed an anti-depressant medication. Initially, the resident was placed on a 30-day exemption with the expectation of discharge within that period. However, no further Level I or Level II screenings were conducted, and there was no documentation indicating that the State Mental Health Authority was informed of the resident's continued stay at the facility. Additionally, there was no documentation regarding the resident's need for a Level II assessment from Community Mental Health. The resident's clinical record showed changes in psychotropic medication and a new diagnosis of anxiety, which were not followed by the required PAS/ARR documentation. During an interview, the Case Manager/Social Service Director confirmed that the social workers were responsible for tracking PAS/ARR due dates and notifying him for completion and submission to Community Mental Health. Upon review, it was confirmed that there was no information in the Community Mental Health portal, and the Case Manager/Social Service Director could not provide an explanation for the missing documentation.
Deficiencies in Care Plan Development for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care management. Resident #92, who was admitted with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and prescribed Eliquis, a blood-thinning medication, did not have a care plan addressing the use of this high-risk medication. This oversight was confirmed by the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged the absence of a care plan for the anticoagulant, which is expected for managing such medications. Similarly, Resident #370, who was admitted with end-stage renal disease and dependent on dialysis, lacked a care plan and physician orders related to her dialysis treatment. Despite the resident's routine attendance at outside dialysis appointments, there was no documentation in her care plan or physician orders regarding her dialysis schedule or necessary assessments. This deficiency was confirmed by both a Registered Nurse and the Nursing Unit Manager, who noted the importance of having a dialysis care plan and physician orders to ensure effective communication and assessments.
Failure to Assist Resident with Personal Hygiene Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for a resident, resulting in the potential for unmet needs. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and arthritis, was assessed to have moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Despite the resident's preference to be shaved and not have a beard, observations over several days showed that the resident had a long, unkempt beard. The resident reported having communicated this preference to the staff previously. The facility's documentation, including the Kardex and task log, indicated that the resident required substantial to maximal assistance for personal hygiene tasks. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistencies in understanding the resident's preferences for shaving, with one CNA incorrectly stating that the resident preferred the beautician for shaving. The Unit Manager confirmed that the resident's preference should be documented in the Kardex and that CNAs should assist with shaving. The facility's policies on ADLs and shaving male residents emphasize providing care according to the resident's desires, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Hearing Aids for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide proper assistive devices to maintain hearing for a resident diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder. The resident was admitted with adequate hearing when using hearing aids, as noted in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. However, the facility's Kardex did not document the need for hearing aids. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident had been without hearing aids for an extended period, confirmed by both the resident and her roommate. The resident's ability to hear was compromised, requiring others to speak loudly and slowly for her to understand. Interviews with staff and family members indicated that the resident had previously thrown away her hearing aids, and the facility was aware of the missing devices. Despite this, there was no documentation of a missing item report, and the care plan interventions related to hearing aids had been removed without explanation. Family members expressed concern about the resident's isolation and inability to hear the television, which she enjoyed. The facility's policy on grievances and complaints was not followed, as there was confusion and a lack of timely investigation into the missing hearing aids.
Failure to Justify Continued Use of Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to justify the continued use of psychotropic medications for a resident, identified as Resident #154, who was observed to be pleasant and socially engaging without any documented distressing behaviors. The resident, a female with multiple diagnoses including major depressive disorder and delusional disorders, was on Seroquel and Effexor. Despite the absence of documented distressing behaviors or mood concerns, the facility continued the use of these medications without adequate justification or documentation of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Seroquel. The resident's medical records and psychiatric consults indicated that her psychiatric condition remained unchanged, and she appeared happy and denied depression or anxiety. However, the facility did not provide clinical documentation to support the continued use of Seroquel at 75 mg without a GDR. The psychiatric consults reviewed did not recommend a dose reduction, and the facility's behavior tracking logs showed minimal behaviors that were not distressing to the resident. The social worker reported that behaviors such as delusions, hallucinations, and agitation were documented in the facility's electronic medical records and reviewed quarterly. However, there was uncertainty about whether these behaviors were documented following the September GDR. The facility failed to provide the requested documentation to justify the continued use of Seroquel without a GDR before the survey exit.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 93 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Jackson
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency At Jackson | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 1 |
| Vista Grande Villa | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Mission Point Health Campus Of Jackson | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Cascade Senior Care Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Faith Haven Senior Care Centre | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Jackson County Medical Care Facility.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.