Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Keswick Multi-care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Unclean and damaged food service equipment, sinks, drains, and storage areas were observed during the kitchen tour. Surveyors found soiled gaskets, cracked and pitted parts, leaking graywater lines, mold-like substances on caulking, missing backflow prevention devices, unclean ice and dish equipment, a live cockroach in the ware washing area, and multiple rusted, chipped, or broken surfaces. The kitchen GM and Maintenance Director were interviewed about the deficient conditions.
Missing Bathroom Call Light Pull Cords: Surveyors observed wall-mounted call light devices in 5 resident bathrooms without accessible pull cords on the [NAME] Ground unit. The LNHA and VP of Facility Services/Maintenance were informed, and the VP stated there were issues with the durability of the pull cords.
Pest Control Program Not Maintained: Surveyors observed fruit flies under the coffee/tea sink drainpipe, fruit flies near the dish machine hand sink, and live cockroaches in the manual ware washing area, laundry room, and on the dish machine leg. A kitchen janitor's closet light cover also contained a significant number of dead insects, and the kitchen GM stated that a pest control contractor was scheduled to treat the premises weekly.
The facility failed to ensure accurate completion of MDS assessments for two residents. One resident with atrial fibrillation had an active order and care plan for the anticoagulant Xarelto, but the admission and 5-day Medicare MDS (Section N – Medications) did not code the use of an anticoagulant. Another resident’s progress notes documented a discharge to the hospital, while the Discharge – return not anticipated MDS incorrectly coded a discharge home under home health services. These discrepancies show that MDS coding did not accurately reflect the residents’ actual medication regimen and discharge status.
Failure to Document Advance Directive Offerings: The facility failed to document that advance directives were offered and discussed for three residents. Record review showed MOLST review and, in some cases, no advance directives on file, but the chart lacked documentation that the residents were offered education to complete an advance directive. The SW acknowledged missing documentation for two residents, and later notes for each resident documented that advance directives were offered and declined.
A resident's room was observed with a grey bed pan under the sink in the bathroom and a used blue surgical mask on the floor in the corner. The UM/RN acknowledged the items on the floor were an issue and called housekeeping to remove them.
The facility failed to provide and document written bed hold policy notification when two residents were transferred to the hospital. One resident, who received dialysis and was sent out for bleeding from an AV fistula after treatment, had no record of notification to the resident or RP. Another resident was transferred after low BP during an avascular appointment, and staff could not produce written proof that the RP received the bed hold policy.
The facility failed to transmit a completed MDS assessment for a resident after discharge. The MDS was completed but not submitted to CMS, and an MDS consultant confirmed the omission during interview.
Care plans were not reviewed and revised after changes in condition for two residents. One resident had repeated falls and reported increased discomfort and difficulty moving a foot, but the fall care plan was not updated after the events. Another resident’s care plan remained active for PO antibiotic therapy for bronchitis even after the antibiotic course had ended, and the DON confirmed the record issue.
The facility failed to complete an ordered MBS for a resident who reported food getting stuck in the throat, and failed to properly assess and implement physician-recommended treatment plans for skin impairments in two other residents. One resident had a left great toe infection/paronychia with delayed follow-up and conflicting wound treatment orders, while another resident with sacral MASD and other skin issues continued to receive a prior topical treatment instead of the ordered zinc paste.
Inadequate monitoring and documentation of a Stage IV sacral pressure injury. A resident with immobility and comorbidities had an ongoing sacral wound treated with hypochlorous acid solution, but wound documentation did not show evaluation of treatment effectiveness or complete wound characteristics. The record also showed a 14-day gap without a documented wound assessment, even though the wound had been described as worsening on a prior observation tool.
Safe respiratory care was not provided when an unsecured O2 tank was observed at the nursing station and two residents with active O2 orders had emergency O2 tanks in their rooms without the required door signage. One resident’s tank was stored in a wheelchair pocket in the bathroom, and another resident’s tank was secured in an O2 stand, but neither room had signage indicating the presence of an emergency O2 tank.
A resident’s MRR recommendations to adjust Allopurinol and Tiotropium were not addressed in a timely manner. The DON described the facility’s MRR follow-up process, but the resident’s review was not signed and the order update was not documented until two months later. The LNHA confirmed no additional documentation showed the recommendations were addressed earlier.
A facility failed to ensure resident drug regimens were free from unnecessary meds and did not follow physician orders or psychotropic monitoring requirements. A resident received metoprolol despite BP hold parameters, two residents on psychotropics lacked documented side effect monitoring, and another resident’s PRN hydroxyzine lacked physician rationale for continued use as well as documentation of side effect monitoring and non-pharmacological interventions before administration.
A resident reported needing dental cleaning and waiting months for the facility to make an appointment. The record showed a physician ordered a referral for dental care, but follow-up remained pending and the resident was still unaware of any appointment. The DON stated the resident had previously refused dental services, but did not explain why the later order was not addressed.
Unclean Exterior Trash Compactor Area: The facility failed to maintain the exterior trash compactor area to prevent pest harborage. Surveyors observed waste leaks and debris on the cement surfaces around and beneath the compactor, with wooden pallets propped against the side wall. The compactor was located near the kitchen rear doors and a storage room holding emergency water supplies, and the Maintenance Director acknowledged the area would be cleaned.
Surveyors observed a clean linen cart on a nursing unit that was stocked with wash clothes and linen but left uncovered while two staff members obtained linen from it. An RN later covered the cart and stated that the clean linen cart should have been covered. Facility management was notified of the infection control concern at the exit conference.
Kitchen equipment was not maintained in proper operating condition during survey. Surveyors observed a cookline steam table being used as a prep table with paper products stored in the steam wells, a Chef Base 4-drawer refrigerator with cooking equipment placed on top, and a solid interceptor beneath the pre-rinse station leaking greywater onto the floor.
A resident with intact cognition and a history of depression, who was dependent on staff for toileting, was subjected to verbal abuse by a GNA during incontinence care. The GNA used inappropriate and expletive language, causing the resident to become embarrassed and cry. The incident was confirmed through interviews and documentation, revealing a failure to protect the resident from verbal abuse.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple comorbidities was found to have a left shoulder fracture of unknown origin. After x-ray results confirmed the injury, the facility did not report the incident to state authorities within the required two-hour window, as mandated by policy. The delay occurred because the supervisor did not complete the initial report after being notified of the injury.
Surveyors identified deficiencies in the facility's kitchen, including a dietary aide not wearing a hair restraint, uncovered and unlabeled food items, and a dishwasher operating below the recommended temperature. The CDM confirmed these issues and acknowledged the concerns raised by the surveyors.
The facility failed to report allegations of abuse within the required timeframes, as identified in incidents MD#00188565, MD#00200867, and MD#00181354. The Administrator misunderstood the reporting requirements, believing that allegations not involving serious bodily injury could be reported within 24 hours. This misunderstanding was reflected in the facility's policies, which did not ensure timely reporting to the appropriate authorities.
The facility failed to report a resident's missing funds to law enforcement and delayed reporting abuse allegations to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within the required 2-hour timeframe. A resident's missing money was not reported to the police, and abuse allegations involving two residents were reported late to OHCQ due to a misunderstanding of reporting requirements by the Nursing Home Administrator.
A resident reported abuse involving a male perpetrator over two nights. Despite the facility being informed, no immediate protective measures were taken. Two male staff members continued working during the investigation without being removed from assignment. The facility's ADON confirmed no staff were placed on leave during the investigation.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents, including one with prostheses, another with denture issues, and a third with ESRD requiring dialysis. The care plans lacked specific interventions and goals, as confirmed by nursing staff and management.
A resident experienced repeated removal of a g-tube, requiring multiple replacements over five months. The care plan was revised but lacked effective interventions. Staff acknowledged the issue, and the DON was informed.
A facility failed to provide scheduled showers for a resident who was dependent on staff for ADL care. Despite a physician's order for showers twice a week, the resident only received bed baths due to scheduling conflicts with dialysis days. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, and the ADON acknowledged the issue.
A resident experienced a fall and reported severe pain, but the facility delayed administering pain medication for over two hours. A STAT X-ray was ordered but not conducted until the next day, and despite a physician's order, the resident was not promptly sent to the hospital. Staff interviews confirmed these delays and previous issues with the X-ray company's response times.
A facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with a urostomy, as there were no specific orders for stoma care, site assessment, or urine output documentation. The resident experienced issues with a leaking urine bag and prolonged periods without emptying. The DON confirmed the absence of necessary orders, indicating a deficiency in the facility's management process.
A resident's call device was found inaccessible during a survey, as it was attached to a bed rail in the down position and resting on the floor, obstructed by a bedside table. An LPN confirmed the device should be within reach, aligning with the resident's care plan, which was not followed.
The facility failed to transmit MDS assessments within the required 14 days for two residents and did not complete a discharge assessment for another. An MDS nurse confirmed the oversight, stating assessments were transmitted weekly but without specific days. The DON and ADON were informed of these deficiencies.
A facility failed to accurately document a resident's oral assessment, leading to incorrect MDS coding. The resident, who had no natural teeth and used dentures, was inaccurately recorded as having natural teeth in both the admission assessment and baseline care plan. Interviews with staff revealed that the MDS assessment did not capture the resident's edentulous status correctly, indicating a lapse in documentation and assessment processes.
A resident received medications improperly when an LPN punctured soft gel capsules, contrary to facility policy, and administered Docusate Sodium in capsule form instead of the prescribed tablet. The DON and ADON acknowledged the errors during a follow-up discussion.
A resident with chronic pain and prostate cancer experienced inconsistent pain management due to the facility's failure to adhere to professional standards. PRN pain medication orders lacked parameters for pain scores, leading to inappropriate administration of Oxycodone and Acetaminophen. Interviews with staff confirmed the absence of pain score parameters and acknowledged the inconsistency in medication administration.
A resident was administered Docusate Sodium in a soft gel capsule form instead of the ordered tablet form. An LPN prepared and administered the medication by cutting the capsules and mixing the contents with applesauce. The error was confirmed upon review of the resident's medical records, and the DON and ADON were notified.
A resident with COVID-19 was unnecessarily administered Azithromycin, an antibiotic, despite it not being a standard treatment for the virus. The order was created by an RN and later signed by a physician, although both the Infection Preventionist and the physician expressed confusion over the necessity of the antibiotic. The facility's antibiotic stewardship program flagged the order, but no documented communication with the physician was found.
The facility failed to post Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) signs in front of residents' rooms, which are necessary to prevent infection transmission. During a survey, it was found that two residents' rooms lacked the required EBP signs, and another resident had an incorrect sign posted. This deficiency affected residents with specific medical needs, such as tube feeding, highlighting a lapse in the facility's infection control measures.
The facility failed to document the vaccination status of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for three residents. A resident admitted in September 2024 had no documented flu vaccination status, another admitted in June 2024 lacked pneumococcal vaccine documentation, and a third resident did not have their annual flu vaccine status documented for 2022. The unit manager was responsible for assessing vaccination status, but the required documentation was missing from the electronic medical records. The DON acknowledged these findings.
A facility failed to document COVID-19 vaccine education for a resident who refused the vaccine upon admission. Despite the facility's routine of providing education at admission, no evidence was found in the resident's records. The deficiency was acknowledged by the DON during a survey.
Unclean and Damaged Kitchen Equipment and Plumbing Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain food service equipment and kitchen surfaces in a sanitary condition during the initial kitchen tour of the recertification survey. Surveyors observed soiled gaskets on the Victory #145 one-door reach-in unit, torn, cracked, and pitted green plastic guards in the Victory #144 unit, uneven grouting where the refrigerators were sealed to the tiled floor, and multiple areas where equipment, walls, floors, and storage surfaces were unclean, rusted, cracked, chipped, or otherwise damaged. The kitchen GM was present during the tour, and the surveyors documented these conditions as part of the deficiency findings. Surveyors also observed multiple plumbing and drainage problems in the kitchen and related work areas. These included a dump sink faucet and a cookline preparation sink faucet that were not securely fastened, mold-like substances on caulking, broken drain stoppers, leaking drain lines that discharged graywater directly onto the kitchen floor, an unclean floor sink and drain cover, and fruit flies around the drain line. The report also noted missing backflow prevention devices on the coffee and tea machine water lines, a hand sink not properly sealed to the wall, and a locked door adjacent to the eye-washing station that limited access during the survey. Additional observations included improper storage and cleanliness issues throughout the kitchen, dish room, ware washing area, walk-ins, and dry storage room. Surveyors found clean dish and utensil shelving less than 18 inches off the floor, a clean equipment rack placed on top of the grease trap interceptor, unclean knife holders, unclean ice machine surfaces, cracked ice machine bin doors, unclean racks and cutting boards, a live cockroach on the wall at the ware washing area, damaged floor tiles, open kitchen doors with light gaps, unclean compressor fan covers, condensate dripping over food products, and steam and vapors escaping from the dish machine. At 11:30 AM, the kitchen GM and Maintenance Director were interviewed to review the deficient practices identified.
Missing Bathroom Call Light Pull Cords
Penalty
Summary
A working call system was not available in the bathrooms of 5 resident rooms on the [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit because the wall-mounted call light devices had no accessible pull cords attached. During a tour at 8:45 AM on 2/24/2026, the surveyor observed this condition in the bathrooms of Resident #113, #115, #132, #161, and #172, out of 34 resident bathrooms observed on the unit. The report states that these call light devices were located on the wall next to the toilet, but no cord was attached to them. During an interview at 11:30 AM on 2/27/2026, the LNHA and the [NAME] President of Facility Services/Maintenance were informed of the missing pull cords. The LNHA and the VP observed the call light device in Resident #161's bathroom and confirmed that there was no pull cord attached to the wall-mounted device next to the toilet. The VP stated that there were issues with the durability of the call light device pull cords.
Pest Control Program Not Maintained
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment for residents, as evidenced by multiple pest sightings during the recertification survey in 6 of 6 areas reviewed. Surveyors observed fruit flies beneath the drainpipe of the coffee/tea preparation sink at 7:50 AM, a live cockroach crawling on the wall at the manual ware washing area at 8:10 AM, and fruit flies near the dish machine hand sink in front of the chemical storage room at 9:00 AM. At 10:08 AM, a live cockroach was seen crawling on the floor of the laundry room, and the Maintenance Director acknowledged the cockroach near the laundry machine. At 10:30 AM, the kitchen janitor's closet light cover was found to have a significant number of dead insects, which the Maintenance Director confirmed would be cleaned. Later, at 2:40 PM, a live roach was observed crawling on the leg of the dish machine during a revisit with the Administrator, and the kitchen General Manager stated that a pest control contractor was scheduled to treat the premises weekly every Wednesday.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Medications and Discharge Status
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, despite having clear clinical documentation to support correct coding. For one resident with atrial fibrillation, the medical record showed an active physician order for the anticoagulant Xarelto and a current care plan problem for anticoagulant therapy. However, the admission and Medicare 5-Day MDS assessments, specifically Section N – Medications, did not reflect that the resident was taking an anticoagulant. This discrepancy was identified during surveyor review of the resident’s medical record and comparison of the MDS with the physician orders and care plan. For another resident, review of a closed medical record showed that progress notes documented a discharge to the hospital on a specific date. In contrast, the Discharge – return not anticipated MDS assessment coded that the resident was discharged home under the care of an organized home health service organization. During an interview, the LNHA confirmed that the resident had in fact been discharged to the hospital, not home with home health services. These inconsistencies between the MDS assessments and the residents’ actual medication regimen and discharge destination demonstrate that the facility did not ensure accurate completion of MDS assessments for the residents reviewed.
Failure to Document Advance Directive Offerings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document that advance directives were offered and discussed with residents. During record review, Resident #144 had a social services progress note documenting review of MOLST with the resident and responsible party, but there was no documentation that an advance directive was discussed. The Social Services Coordinator stated that the expectation was to document whether advance directives were on file and, if none were on file, to offer education to formulate one. A later note for this resident documented that MOLST was reviewed, no advance directives were on file, and the resident was offered the opportunity to complete advance directives and declined. Resident #172 also had a social services progress note documenting review of MOLST and that no advance directives were on file, but there was no documentation that the resident was offered education to complete an advance directive. The Social Services Coordinator acknowledged missing documentation for this resident. Resident #173 had no documentation that the resident did or did not have an advance directive and no documentation that education on formulation of an advance directive was offered. A later note for this resident documented that no advance directive was on file and that the resident was offered the opportunity to complete one and declined.
Unsanitary Items Left on Resident Room Floor
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #14's environment was kept clean, comfortable, and sanitary. During the annual recertification survey, surveyors observed two items on the floor in the resident's room: a grey bed pan in the bathroom under the sink and a blue surgical mask in the corner of the room that appeared to have been worn. When the Unit Manager/RN was shown the items, the RN acknowledged that the items being on the floor was an issue and called housekeeping to remove them.
Failure to Document Bed Hold Policy Notification During Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify residents or their resident representatives in writing of the bed hold policy and failed to document that notification when residents were transferred to the hospital. This deficiency was identified in 2 of 5 residents reviewed for the discharge process, including Resident #172 and Resident #9. Resident #172 received dialysis at the facility and was transferred to University of Maryland Midtown hospital after bleeding from the AV fistula site following a dialysis session. The medical record contained no documentation that the resident or responsible party was notified of the bed hold policy at the time of the hospital transfer. In interview, the ADON stated the expectation was for nursing staff to document bed hold notification in the progress notes, but no progress note was present for the transfer. Resident #9 was sent to the hospital after low blood pressure during an avascular appointment, and staff were unable to provide written documentation that the resident's responsible party was given the bed hold policy upon transfer.
Failure to Transmit Completed MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to CMS within 14 days of completion for one resident reviewed for assessment transmission. Resident #133 was discharged on 11/11/2025, and the MDS Assessment Discharge Return, Not Anticipated with ADR of 11/11/2025, was completed on 11/17/2025. During record review, it was found that the completed assessment had not been transmitted to CMS. In a telephone interview, the MDS Consultant confirmed that the assessment was completed but not submitted to CMS and stated, "I am going to submit it now."
Care plans not revised after falls and completion of antibiotic therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary care plans were reviewed and revised after changes in condition related to resident falls and resident treatment. Resident #143 reported a recent fall while self-transporting to the bathroom in a wheelchair, stating the call cord was too far away to reach and that he/she lay on the floor for a period of time calling out for help. The resident also reported increased discomfort and difficulty moving the left foot, with a need for more assistance with transport to the bathroom. Medical record review showed two documented falls, including one where the resident was heard yelling for help and found on the bathroom floor during rounds, and another where the resident was observed on the floor between the wheelchair and toilet with legs toward the door. Resident #143 had an existing fall care plan addressing actual falls without injury and poor balance, with interventions such as keeping the bed low, placing the call bell and personal items within reach, using a wheelchair seat, encouraging use of a reacher, and ensuring appropriate footwear. However, there was no evidence the fall care plan was revised after the two February falls. Resident #92’s record showed antibiotic therapy for bronchitis from 01/08/2026 through 01/12/2026, but the care plan remained active and continued to state the resident was on PO antibiotic therapy related to bronchitis and elevated WBC of 11.8 after the antibiotic course had ended. The DON reviewed the record and confirmed the finding.
Failure to Complete Ordered Swallow Study and Implement Wound Treatment Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an ordered modified barium swallow study was completed for a resident who reported that food sometimes got stuck in the throat. The resident had a physician order dated 12/05/2025 to obtain the study to evaluate swallowing, but the medical record did not show that the test was scheduled. The Director of Nursing described the process for outside appointments, including daily review of orders and updating physician orders with appointment details once scheduled, but no evidence of scheduling was found in the record. The facility also failed to properly assess, evaluate, and implement physician recommendations for treatment of skin impairments for two residents. One resident had a left great toe infection/paronychia with purulent drainage and erythema, and a wound physician recommended a podiatry consult; however, there was no further assessment of the toe for 21 days, and later consult recommendations differed from the existing treatment orders in the record. Another resident had skin integrity issues including a surgical site and pressure injury, and a wound physician later documented sacral MASD with measurements and ordered zinc paste every shift and as needed, but the treatment administration record showed the sacral wound continued to be treated with Greer's Go instead of the ordered zinc paste.
Inadequate Monitoring and Documentation of a Stage IV Sacral Pressure Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a Stage IV sacral pressure ulcer received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #109 had a care plan focused on the Stage IV sacral pressure ulcer related to immobility and comorbidities, with interventions to administer ordered treatments and monitor and document changes in skin status, wound size, stage, appearance, color, healing, and signs and symptoms of infection. A physician order from 10/16/2024 directed daily sacrum wound treatment with hypochlorous acid solution, moist-to-dry gauze soaked in the solution, and a bordered gauze dressing. Review of the wound documentation showed that a wound physician note on 2/3/2026 measured the sacral Stage IV pressure injury at 5.9 cm x 1.6 cm x 0.8 cm with no necrotic tissue. A wound observation tool on 2/10/2026 documented the wound as worsening, described the tissue as moist, and measured it at 6 cm x 2 cm x 1.2 cm, but the record did not show evaluation of the effectiveness of the hypochlorous treatment or include the wound's appearance characteristics. A later wound physician note on 2/24/2026 measured the wound at 4.3 cm x 2.0 cm x 1.6 cm with no necrotic tissue, and the record showed no documented assessment of the sacral wound from 2/10/2026 until 2/24/2026, leaving a 14-day gap without monitoring. During interview, the ADON stated that weekly wound rounds are conducted, wound descriptions are required, and treatment changes are expected if a wound is not improving or is deteriorating.
Improper Oxygen Storage and Missing Room Signage
Penalty
Summary
Safe and appropriate respiratory care was not provided when oxygen equipment was observed improperly stored and identified in resident rooms without the required signage. On the Ground Nursing Unit nursing station, an emergency oxygen tank was observed standing upright and not secured in a stand or bracket. When asked about the storage expectation, an RN stated, "who put that there" and removed the tank to the oxygen storage room. Two residents were observed with active oxygen therapy orders and oxygen tubing in their nostrils. In one resident room, an emergency oxygen tank was secured in the back pocket of a wheelchair in the bathroom, and there was no oxygen signage on the room door to indicate that an emergency tank was present. In another resident room, an emergency oxygen tank was secured in an oxygen stand, but there was also no oxygen signage on the room door. The facility's Oxygen Tank Storage Policy dated 5/2023 stated that when an oxygen tank is in a resident room, it should be placed in its holder stand at all times.
Delayed Response to Pharmacist Medication Review Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to respond to consulting pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner for Resident #13. The resident’s medication regimen review dated 6/28/2025 identified recommendations to increase Allopurinol and decrease Tiotropium, but the recommendations were not addressed until 8/28/2025. The DON stated that monthly MRRs are emailed by the pharmacist, printed, and followed up on by the nursing team or physician, with new orders updated in PCC and the recommendation uploaded to PCC. However, the resident’s MRR was signed by a Registered Nurse and Unit Manager on 8/28/2025, and the order update was documented the same day. The LNHA was asked to provide additional documentation showing the MRR had been addressed earlier, but confirmed that no other documentation was available.
Unnecessary Medication Use and Inadequate Psychotropic Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications and failed to follow physician orders and monitoring requirements for several residents. During the annual recertification survey, surveyors identified deficiencies involving 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, including failure to hold a prescribed beta blocker when blood pressure parameters were not met, inadequate monitoring of psychotropic medication side effects, and lack of documentation supporting continued use of an as-needed psychotropic medication. For Resident #26, the record showed an order for Metoprolol ER 100 mg daily for hypertension with instructions to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was below 100. The MAR showed the medication was administered on three occasions when the documented systolic blood pressure was 98, 98, and 97. The DON and ADON reviewed the MAR with the surveyor and acknowledged that the medication had been given despite the hold parameter. For Resident #33 and Resident #92, the clinical records showed ongoing psychotropic medication use, including Seroquel, Trazodone, Mirtazapine, and Sertraline, but the records did not show a process for monitoring side effects, including the frequency or tools used. For Resident #7, the record showed an order for hydroxyzine HCl 25 mg every 6 hours as needed for anxiety, but there was no physician documentation supporting continued use, and the record lacked documentation of side effect monitoring and non-pharmacological interventions before administration. The DON stated that psychotropic side effect monitoring and non-pharmacological interventions for as-needed psychotropics were documented in progress notes, and the concern was discussed during the survey.
Failure to Arrange Ordered Dental Follow-Up
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine dental care after a physician ordered a referral to a dental school for dental cleaning at the resident’s request. The resident stated that his/her teeth needed cleaning and that he/she had been waiting for 6 months for the facility to make an appointment. The clinical record showed a physician note indicating the resident requested follow-up with a dentist, a physician’s order for referral to the dental school, and later notes stating the resident was still pending dental follow-up and was not aware of any appointment. A psychotherapist note also documented the resident’s frustration about waiting for the dental appointment. During interview, the DON stated the resident had been offered dental services earlier and had refused, but did not explain why the later physician’s order was not addressed.
Unclean Exterior Trash Compactor Area
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate maintenance of the exterior trash compactor to prevent the harborage and infestation of pests. During observation with the Maintenance Director, the trash compactor was found at the far end of the open loading dock, about 24 feet from the rear kitchen doors and about 6 feet from the central storage room doors where emergency water supplies were stored. The cemented surfaces around and beneath the trash compactor were unclean and had waste leaks and debris, and several wooden pallets were propped against the side wall. The Maintenance Director acknowledged the area would be cleaned, and stated there were no alternative locations available for relocating the trash compactor.
Uncovered Clean Linen Cart Observed in Hallway
Penalty
Summary
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program was cited after surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices related to linen availability, usage, and storage. On 2/24/2026 at 12:07 PM, the surveyor observed a clean linen cart on the [NAME] Ground Nursing Unit in the hall next to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The cart was sufficiently stocked with wash clothes and linen, but it was left uncovered while two staff members were observed obtaining linen from it. During an interview at 12:12 PM, RN employee #14 was asked about the expectation for the clean linen cart, observed the cart, covered it with the tan-colored plastic cover attached to it, and stated that the clean linen cart should have been covered. Facility management was notified of the concern at the survey exit conference.
Kitchen Equipment Not Maintained in Safe Operating Condition
Penalty
Summary
Essential kitchen equipment was not maintained in proper operating condition during the recertification survey, as evidenced by 3 of 3 pieces of equipment reviewed being nonfunctional according to the manufacturer's specifications. On 02/24/2026 at 8:30 AM, surveyors observed the steam table on the cookline being used as a prep table with steam wells used to store paper products, the Chef Base 4-drawer refrigerator on the cookline with cooking equipment placed on top of it, and the solid interceptor beneath the pre-rinse station in the dish machine area leaking greywater directly onto the floor. The Administrator and the kitchen General Manager later confirmed that the solid interceptor had been repaired, and the surveyor visually verified its functionality.
Failure to Protect Resident from Verbal Abuse During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of cerebrovascular disease, depression, dementia, and chronic kidney disease, who was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, was subjected to verbal abuse by a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) during incontinence care. The resident had intact cognition, as indicated by a BIMS score of 13, and was known to experience feelings of depression and low energy. The care plan documented the resident's dependence on staff for incontinence care and noted behavioral concerns related to depression and anxiety. The incident occurred when the resident's family member, while on the phone with the resident, overheard the GNA use inappropriate and expletive language directed at the resident during incontinence care. The GNA questioned the resident in a derogatory manner about their incontinence, which caused the resident to become embarrassed, upset, and cry. The resident later confirmed to the social worker that the GNA used inappropriate language and expletives during care, and this was corroborated by behavioral health notes documenting the resident's distress over the interaction. The GNA denied using inappropriate language but admitted to making comments about the resident's actions during care. Facility documentation, including interviews with the resident, family member, and staff, as well as behavioral health progress notes, confirmed that the resident experienced verbal abuse during care. The incident was substantiated by the facility, and the resident reported feeling embarrassed and upset as a result of the GNA's comments. The facility's policy stated zero tolerance for abuse, but the actions of the GNA failed to protect the resident from verbal abuse during a vulnerable moment.
Failure to Timely Report Injury of Unknown Source
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an injury of unknown source within two hours of being informed that a resident sustained a serious bodily injury, as required by their abuse and neglect policy. The policy mandates that allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or injury of unknown origin resulting in serious bodily injury must be reported to state agencies within two hours. In this case, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and a history of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis was found to have a minimally angulated fracture of the proximal neck of the left humerus. The injury was identified after the resident exhibited swelling and pain in the left shoulder, prompting an x-ray ordered by the physician. The x-ray results, which indicated a fracture, were received and sent to the physician between 6:30 PM and 7:00 PM, with the physician responding around 9:30 PM. Despite the facility becoming aware of the injury upon receipt of the x-ray results, the initial two-hour report to the state agency was not completed within the required timeframe. The Executive Director confirmed that the supervisor did not complete the initial two-hour report after being notified of the injury. The facility ultimately notified the state survey agency at 10:45 PM, which was outside the two-hour window from when the x-ray results were received and the injury was identified. This delay constituted a failure to comply with regulatory reporting guidelines for suspected abuse or injury of unknown source.
Kitchen Deficiencies in Food Safety and Equipment Maintenance
Penalty
Summary
The facility was found to have several deficiencies in its kitchen operations. During an initial tour, a dietary aide was observed plating food without a hair restraint, which was against the facility's expectations. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) confirmed that staff were expected to wear hair restraints and acknowledged the concern. Additionally, surveyors observed uncovered and unlabeled food items in the produce walk-in refrigerator, including cups of mandarin oranges and diced pears, as well as salads without labeling. The CDM acknowledged that these items should have been dated and labeled, confirming the surveyor's concerns. The facility's dishwasher was also found to be operating below the manufacturer's recommended minimum wash temperature of 160°F. Observations showed the dishwasher's temperature at 148°F, and previous logs indicated temperatures of 154°F on two separate occasions. The CDM was unaware of the correct minimum temperature and had not documented any corrective actions or managerial reviews for the dishwasher's temperature logs. The CDM acknowledged the issue after being shown the manufacturer's placard and confirmed understanding of the surveyor's concerns.
Deficiency in Abuse Reporting Timeframes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately address reporting timeframes for allegations of abuse in their policies, as identified during a surveyor's review of a facility-reported incident, MD#00188565. The incident involved an allegation of abuse that was not reported to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within the required timeframe. The facility's Administrator believed that allegations not involving serious bodily injury could be reported within 24 hours, contrary to the requirement for immediate reporting or within two hours if serious bodily injury is involved. This misunderstanding was evident in additional facility-reported incidents, MD#00200867 and MD#00181354, which also involved delayed reporting of abuse allegations. The surveyor reviewed two facility policies related to abuse reporting, which outlined different reporting timeframes based on the seriousness of bodily injury. However, the policies did not ensure timely reporting to the appropriate authorities as required. During interviews, the Administrator acknowledged the misunderstanding and confirmed that the policies were reviewed annually and updated as needed. Despite this, the surveyor noted that no changes had been made to the abuse policies in response to the current understanding of reporting timeframes, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's compliance with abuse reporting requirements.
Failure to Timely Report Abuse and Misappropriation
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to report the misappropriation of a resident's funds to local law enforcement. Resident #75 reported missing $200 from his wallet after returning from a hospital visit. Although the facility conducted an investigation and reported the incident to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), they did not notify the police, which was acknowledged as a lapse by the Director of Nursing (DON). The facility also failed to report allegations of abuse within the required 2-hour timeframe to the regulatory agency, OHCQ. Resident #310 reported an abuse allegation to dialysis staff, which was communicated to the facility's DON and other officials. However, the initial self-report to OHCQ was made more than 27 hours later. Similarly, Resident #69's allegation of being pushed by a staff member was reported to the police but not to OHCQ within the required timeframe. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) misunderstood the reporting requirements, believing that incidents not involving serious bodily injury could be reported within 24 hours. Another incident involved Resident #93, who expressed discomfort with a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) being rough. This was reported to the House Supervisor, but the initial self-report to OHCQ was delayed beyond the 2-hour requirement. The NHA again cited a misunderstanding of the reporting timeframe for incidents not involving serious bodily injury, leading to a failure to meet the regulatory requirements.
Failure to Protect Resident During Abuse Investigation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to take appropriate measures to protect a resident during an abuse investigation. A resident reported an allegation of abuse to dialysis staff, who then informed the facility's Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, and the President of Clinical Services. The facility was aware of the allegation shortly after it was reported. The resident expressed fear for their safety, and the alleged abuse involved a male perpetrator over two consecutive nights. Despite this, the facility did not take immediate action to protect the resident from potential harm by male staff members during the investigation. The investigation file revealed that two male staff members, who were working during the alleged timeframe, continued to work their shifts without being removed from assignment or placed on administrative leave. The facility's Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that no staff had been removed from assignment during the investigation. The surveyor noted that the psych consult for the resident occurred the day after the allegation was reported. The facility's failure to take precautionary measures during the investigation was acknowledged by the Assistant Director of Nursing during an interview with the surveyor.
Deficiencies in Comprehensive Care Planning for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and person-centered care plans for three residents during a recertification/complaint survey. For Resident #50, the care plan did not include the use of lower extremity prostheses, despite the resident having medical diagnoses of acquired absence of both legs below the knee and using prostheses daily. The absence of a medical order or care plan for the prostheses was confirmed by both a registered nurse and a unit manager, who acknowledged the oversight. Resident #12's care plan lacked pertinent goals and interventions related to denture use, despite the resident having no upper or lower teeth and experiencing issues with ill-fitting lower dentures. The resident's admission assessment incorrectly documented natural teeth, and no orders were placed for denture care and storage. The unit manager was unaware of the missing denture care plan until informed by the surveyor. For Resident #312, the facility did not develop a care plan addressing the resident's End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and dependence on hemodialysis. Although the resident's medical records and physician orders indicated the need for dialysis and monitoring of an AV fistula, the care plan failed to include specific interventions and approaches for these needs. The Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the deficiency upon review.
Failure to Prevent Repeated G-Tube Removal
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective interdisciplinary care plan to prevent the repeated removal of a gastronomy tube (g-tube) for a resident. The resident experienced five incidents of g-tube removal over approximately five months, requiring multiple replacements. Despite the care plan being revised in August 2024, no additional effective interventions were added to address the issue. The care plan initially stated that the resident would have fewer episodes of g-tube removal, but this goal was not achieved. Interviews with staff revealed that an abdominal binder was ordered to prevent the resident from removing the g-tube, but no further measures were considered. The unit manager acknowledged the care plan's ineffectiveness and the need for updates. The Director of Nursing was informed of these findings and acknowledged the deficiency.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for a dependent resident, as identified during a recertification and complaint survey. The deficiency was noted for a resident who had been in the facility for over 45 days without receiving a full shower or bath, as reported by the resident's family. The physician's order specified that the resident was to have skin assessments and baths on Monday and Thursday evenings, but a review of the GNA task sheet from July to October 2024 showed that the resident only received bed baths and not showers on the assigned days. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident's shower days coincided with their dialysis days, and the night shift staff, responsible for preparing the resident for dialysis, did not provide showers. The GNA confirmed that the resident never received showers since admission, and the Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight. This failure to adhere to the prescribed bathing schedule resulted in the resident not receiving the necessary ADL care as ordered by the physician.
Delayed Pain Management and Hospital Transfer After Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely treatment and care to a resident who sustained a fall, resulting in severe pain. The resident fell on 09/03/23 around 8 PM and reported a pain level of 9/10. Despite the resident's escalating pain, which reached a level of 10/10, the facility staff delayed administering pain medication until 10:30 PM, over two hours after the fall. This delay in pain management was a significant oversight in providing care according to professional standards. Additionally, a STAT X-ray was ordered for the resident's left hip following the fall, but the X-ray was not conducted until the next day at 10:30 AM. Furthermore, despite a physician's order to send the resident to the hospital at 8:59 PM on the day of the fall, the facility staff delayed this action. Interviews with facility staff, including a Registered Nurse and the Director of Nursing, confirmed these delays and highlighted previous issues with the X-ray company's response times, which contributed to the delay in sending the resident to the hospital for evaluation.
Failure to Provide Urostomy Care and Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care and management for a resident with a urostomy, as evidenced by the lack of specific orders for urostomy care. The resident, who was admitted with a urostomy, experienced issues with her urine bag leaking near the surgical wound and being left full of waste for extended periods. This situation was reported during a complaint investigation, where it was found that the resident's records did not include necessary orders for stoma care, site assessment, or documentation of urine output. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained that residents with urostomies should have specific orders in the electronic record system, POINT CLICK CARE, to guide nursing staff in assessing and monitoring the urostomy site. However, it was confirmed that no such orders were present for the resident in question, leading to inadequate care and management of the urostomy. The DON acknowledged the absence of these orders as a concern, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's process for managing residents with urostomies.
Resident's Call Device Inaccessibility
Penalty
Summary
During a recertification survey, it was observed that a resident's call device was not accessible, leading to a deficiency in accommodating the resident's needs. The resident was found sitting on the side of their bed with the call device attached to the bed's side rail, which was in the down position, causing the device to rest on the floor underneath the bed. The bedside table was positioned between the resident and the call device, making it unreachable for the resident. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the issue and acknowledged that the call device should be within the resident's reach when staff leave the room. The resident's care plan included an intervention to ensure the call light was within reach and to encourage its use for assistance, highlighting the facility's failure to adhere to this plan.
Failure to Transmit MDS Assessments Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required 14 days of completion and did not create a discharge assessment for three residents. Specifically, Resident #64's MDS assessment was completed on 6/5/24 but was not transmitted to CMS' IQIES for over 120 days. Similarly, Resident #146's MDS assessment was completed on 6/6/24 and also not transmitted for over 120 days. Additionally, a discharge assessment for Resident #148 was never completed as required. During an interview, MDS nurse #5 stated that assessments were transmitted weekly to CMS but without specific days, and confirmed that all assessments are required to be transmitted regardless of the payer source. The nurse acknowledged the oversight in transmitting the assessments. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) were informed of the deficiencies, which included two resident MDS assessments not being transmitted and one resident assessment not being completed and transmitted for over 120 days.
Inaccurate Oral Assessment Documentation and MDS Coding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document the oral assessment of a resident, leading to an inaccurate coding of the resident's oral status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. During the recertification/complaint survey, it was observed that a resident had no upper or lower teeth and used dentures, which was not accurately reflected in their medical records. The resident's admission assessment incorrectly indicated that they had their own teeth, and the baseline care plan also inaccurately noted natural teeth. This discrepancy was evident despite multiple dental consultations confirming the presence of dentures. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the oral assessments were completed by nurses upon admission and documented in the admission packet. However, the Unit Manager and MDS nurse acknowledged the inaccuracies in the documentation and coding. The MDS nurse confirmed that the MDS assessment did not capture the resident's edentulous status accurately, as it was coded incorrectly. The Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing were informed of these inaccuracies, highlighting a failure in the facility's documentation and assessment processes.
Improper Medication Administration and Form Discrepancy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of nursing practice during medication administration for Resident #318. On the morning of October 16, 2024, an LPN was observed preparing medications for the resident, who required medications to be crushed. The LPN improperly handled soft gel capsules by cutting them open and mixing the contents with applesauce, despite the known risks of altering drug absorption when capsules are punctured. This practice was contrary to the facility's policy, which prohibits the crushing or puncturing of non-crushable medications, such as soft gel capsules. Additionally, there was a discrepancy in the form of medication administered to Resident #318. The resident was prescribed Docusate Sodium in tablet form, but the LPN administered it in a soft gel capsule form instead. This error was confirmed by the LPN and acknowledged by the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) during a follow-up discussion. The facility's policy and in-service education documents were provided to the surveyor, highlighting the expectation that nurses should contact a physician to change medication forms when necessary.
Inconsistent Pain Management for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to provide appropriate pain management for a resident, as evidenced by inconsistent administration of pain medication and lack of adherence to professional standards of practice. The resident, who was readmitted to the facility with chronic pain syndrome, unspecified abdominal pain, and prostate cancer, reported being in constant pain and experiencing delays in receiving pain medication. A review of the resident's clinical records revealed that PRN pain medication orders lacked parameters corresponding to pain scores, leading to inconsistent administration. For instance, Oxycodone was administered for a pain score of 0, and Acetaminophen was given for a pain score of 0, indicating a lack of adherence to appropriate pain management protocols. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN and the DON, confirmed the absence of pain score parameters for PRN medications and acknowledged the inconsistency in medication administration. The DON noted that Oxycodone should not have been given for a pain score of 0 and recognized that the resident's pain was never truly at zero. Additionally, a review of the resident's September MAR showed that Oxycodone was administered outside the ordered parameters, further highlighting the deficiency in pain management practices. The facility staff acknowledged these discrepancies and the need for proper adherence to pain management protocols.
Medication Administration Error: Incorrect Form Given
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer the correct form of medication to a resident, as observed during a recertification/complaint survey. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was seen preparing medications for a resident who required medications to be crushed. The LPN used a PAXIT system to obtain an Omega 3 capsule and a house stock bottle for Docusate Sodium, both of which were in soft gel capsule form. The LPN cut the tips of these capsules, squeezed the contents into a medication cup, and mixed them with applesauce before administering them to the resident. Upon reviewing the resident's medical records, it was found that the order specified Docusate Sodium in tablet form, not as a soft gel capsule. The LPN confirmed the error, acknowledging that the medication administered was not in the ordered form. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) were informed of this discrepancy, highlighting a failure in adhering to the prescribed medication form for the resident.
Unnecessary Antibiotic Use for COVID-19
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary antibiotic use, specifically Azithromycin, which was administered to a resident diagnosed with COVID-19. The resident had reported sinus pressure, and the attending physician noted mild upper respiratory infection and ordered COVID-19 and flu tests. Despite the positive COVID-19 test result, a registered nurse created an order for Azithromycin to treat postnasal drip and COVID-19, which was later signed by the attending physician. The medication was administered over several days, although antibiotics are not typically used to treat COVID-19. The facility's antibiotic stewardship program flagged the Azithromycin order with a question mark, indicating a concern. The Infection Preventionist RN acknowledged the issue, stating that antibiotics were not used to treat COVID-19 and was unsure why the order was placed. The attending physician also expressed confusion over the order, stating that she did not place it and that it did not make sense to treat COVID-19 with antibiotics. The Director of Nursing was informed of these findings, acknowledging the issues discussed.
Failure to Post Enhanced Barrier Precaution Signs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control program by not posting Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) signs in front of residents' rooms, which are necessary to prevent the transmission of infections. This deficiency was identified during a recertification/complaint survey, where it was observed that two residents' rooms did not have the required EBP signs, despite having orders for such precautions. Additionally, another resident had a contact isolation sign posted instead of the required EBP sign. The deficiency was evident for three residents who were reviewed for infection precaution signs. One resident had tube feeding equipment at the bedside, indicating a need for EBP, yet no sign was posted. The facility's infection preventionist acknowledged the issue, and the Director of Nursing was informed of the findings. The lack of proper signage failed to communicate the necessary precautions to individuals entering and exiting the rooms, which is crucial for infection control.
Deficiency in Documenting Vaccination Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document the vaccination status of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for three residents during a recertification/complaint survey. Resident #127, admitted in September 2024, had no documented evidence of flu vaccination status upon admission, despite a previous vaccination in October 2019. Resident #152, admitted in June 2024, lacked documentation of pneumococcal vaccine status. Additionally, Resident #16, admitted in July 2019, did not have documentation of their annual flu vaccine status for the year 2022. The surveyor's review of the residents' records and interviews with the Infection Preventionist RN revealed that the facility's unit manager was responsible for assessing vaccination status and providing education at admission. However, the required documentation was missing from the electronic medical records. The Director of Nursing acknowledged these findings when informed by the surveyor, and no additional documentation was provided to support that the facility completed the necessary vaccination assessments.
Deficiency in Documenting COVID-19 Vaccine Education
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document that COVID-19 vaccine education was provided to a resident, leading to a deficiency identified during a recertification/complaint survey. Specifically, for one resident, upon admission in March 2023, the resident refused the COVID-19 vaccine. However, the electronic medical record indicated that no vaccination education was documented as provided to the resident or their representative. This lack of documentation was noted during a review of the resident's vaccination records. Interviews with the Infection Preventionist Nurse revealed that the facility's routine included offering vaccination and providing education at the time of admission assessment. Despite this, the facility could not provide documented evidence to support that COVID-19 vaccine education was given to the resident or their representative. The Director of Nursing acknowledged these findings during the surveyor's review.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,673 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Baltimore
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 1 |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice Manor | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Future Care Homewood | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium Place | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Future Care Charles Village | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 30 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Keswick Multi-care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.