Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Medications and Discharge Status

Baltimore, Maryland Survey Completed on 03-03-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, despite having clear clinical documentation to support correct coding. For one resident with atrial fibrillation, the medical record showed an active physician order for the anticoagulant Xarelto and a current care plan problem for anticoagulant therapy. However, the admission and Medicare 5-Day MDS assessments, specifically Section N – Medications, did not reflect that the resident was taking an anticoagulant. This discrepancy was identified during surveyor review of the resident’s medical record and comparison of the MDS with the physician orders and care plan. For another resident, review of a closed medical record showed that progress notes documented a discharge to the hospital on a specific date. In contrast, the Discharge – return not anticipated MDS assessment coded that the resident was discharged home under the care of an organized home health service organization. During an interview, the LNHA confirmed that the resident had in fact been discharged to the hospital, not home with home health services. These inconsistencies between the MDS assessments and the residents’ actual medication regimen and discharge destination demonstrate that the facility did not ensure accurate completion of MDS assessments for the residents reviewed.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙