Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Autumn Lake Healthcare At Waugh Chapel during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Inconsistent resident room temperatures led to a deficient homelike environment when multiple rooms were documented above the acceptable range and residents reported repeated episodes of excessive heat. Survey findings included portable AC units throughout the units, resident complaints that the building and rooms were hot, and temperature logs showing several rooms reaching the 80s and even the 90s. The ADM stated thermostats were reset when they tripped, but no documentation was provided showing residents with elevated room temperatures were accommodated.
Incorrect MDS Coding for IV Access: A resident’s MDS was coded incorrectly in Section O for special treatments and procedures. Record review showed the resident had a PICC line and was receiving IV saline flushes, but the MDS Coordinator denied IV access and coded the assessment as if the resident did not have an IV line.
Non-functioning resident call bells were identified in multiple rooms after residents reported delayed staff response and repeated failures of the call system. A resident stated the call light sometimes did not work and testing showed no activation at the room unit, hallway dome, or nurse station, while other residents reported call bells that had not worked for weeks and said they sometimes had to seek staff in the hallway or rely on family to call the facility. Staff confirmed ongoing call system problems in several rooms, and testing showed no staff response to some activated call bells.
A resident with a urinary catheter was observed sitting in a dining room chair with the catheter tubing uncovered and visible in public view. The resident was not fully clothed and did not have a blanket or sheet covering the tubing while in the common dining area, and a GNA who observed the resident agreed with the finding.
A resident reported that GNAs were slow to answer call bells on the evening and overnight shifts, did not ensure the resident was out of bed daily, and refused requested linen changes when the resident said he/she felt wet. A GNA assigned to the resident stated she told the resident the bed was not wet and did not change the linens on two occasions, while also noting the unit was very busy and call bell responses may have been delayed.
Delayed medication administration and documentation were observed for two residents during med pass. An LPN gave scheduled meds well after the ordered times, including meds for DVT prophylaxis, supplement support, HTN, constipation, anxiety, pain, and vision support, and one resident's meds were not documented on the MAR until hours after they were observed being administered. The DON acknowledged meds are expected to be given within the facility's acceptable timeframe and documented promptly after administration.
A facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. During survey observations, the surveyor could not locate the current staffing data for units 4 and 5, and an incorrect Daily Assignment Sheet Nursing form was found behind the nursing station in a sign holder that was not accessible to residents or visitors in wheelchairs. The manager on duty confirmed the sheet was wrong and that the location was not prominent or accessible.
An LPN administered scheduled meds to two residents outside the facility’s acceptable medication administration timeframe, including doses ordered for 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM that were given around 10:29 AM and 10:45 AM. In one case, the meds were not documented on the MAR as administered until 5:21 PM, and the DON acknowledged meds are expected to be given within the acceptable timeframe and documented promptly after administration.
Incomplete and inaccurate resident medical records were identified when psych consult notes for two residents did not include the contracted company’s name, address, or phone number, and another resident’s chart contained an incorrect wound location entry with no corresponding physician treatment order for the documented area. The DON confirmed the wound had been transcribed incorrectly in the record, and the NHA verified the psych provider information was missing from the visit notes.
Improper Urinary Catheter Drainage Bag Placement: A resident with a urinary catheter was observed sitting in a geriatric chair in the dining room with the catheter drainage bag resting directly on the floor. During observation and interview, an GNA stated the bag should not be on the floor and should be attached to the chair.
Unsafe and Unclean Environment in Resident Rooms and Laundry Areas: A resident reported very loud HVAC noise that disrupted sleep for most of the night, another resident’s room had deep wall marks at the head of the bed, and the laundry area had a rotten egg odor linked to a sewer issue. Surveyors also found damaged cabinets with exposed nails in the clean laundry area and torn baseboards dragging on the floor in the dirty laundry area.
Failure to follow a physician order to hold an antihypertensive medication when a resident’s SBP was below 110 mm/Hg. A resident with HTN, post vascular surgery, and arthritis received Amlodipine on multiple occasions despite BP readings below the ordered threshold, and an RN later acknowledged the doses should have been withheld.
The facility failed to ensure food safety in two nourishment room refrigerators, risking foodborne illness. A surveyor found spoiled food items dated beyond the safe storage period, which were validated and removed by staff. An LPN confirmed that food from outside should not be stored for more than three days. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged the issue.
A resident with a Foley catheter was transported to and from rehabilitation activities without their urinary drainage bag being covered, compromising their dignity. The COTA responsible for the transport acknowledged the oversight, stating that nurses were responsible for applying dignity bags. The acting DON confirmed that the facility provides leaf bags for this purpose and that residents should not be transported without them.
A resident reported being slapped on the hand by a GNA during care, which was substantiated by the facility's investigation. The resident was cognitively intact, and the incident occurred when they reached towards their Foley catheter. The GNA's account was found to be conflicting, leading to their termination after the abuse allegation was confirmed.
A facility failed to report an abuse allegation within the required 2-hour timeframe to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). A resident reported being hit by a GNA after admitting to punching the GNA. The DON and NHA were informed of the incident, but the report was submitted over 3 hours later. The NHA confirmed the facility's procedure requires reporting within two hours, and the DON admitted to the late submission.
A facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with frequent UTIs, despite multiple antibiotic treatments. The care plan did not include strategies for managing and preventing UTIs. Interviews with staff confirmed regular care plan meetings, but the resident's plan lacked specific measures for UTI prevention.
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in care. One resident with hemiplegia was observed without a required bolster, and another resident's care plan lacked non-pharmacological interventions for pain management. Both care plans had not been revised since August, despite new medical orders.
A resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis had a prescribed order for a soft bolster to manage a left arm contracture, but the facility failed to consistently use it. Instead, staff sometimes used a folded pillow, and the bolster was found unused in the resident's closet. This failure to adhere to the care plan resulted in a deficiency in providing resident-centered care.
A facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for a resident by not offering nonpharmacological interventions before administering pain medications like Acetaminophen and Oxycodone. Medical records and staff interviews confirmed that these interventions were not attempted, despite being required by physician's orders. This deficiency was identified during a survey.
Inconsistent Resident Room Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently maintain a comfortable homelike environment for residents when multiple resident room temperatures were documented above the acceptable range during June. Surveyor observation on 06/29/26 found twelve portable air conditioning units on the nursing units throughout the building. Resident interviews described repeated periods of excessive heat in the building and in individual rooms, including one resident reporting the building was hot for a few days a couple of weeks earlier, another stating the building reached 89 degrees according to the thermostat and that part of the building was cold while part was hot, and another reporting the air conditioning went out and the room was about 85 degrees on multiple occasions. Temperature logs reviewed by the surveyor showed multiple resident rooms above 81 degrees Fahrenheit on several dates, including readings of 84.2, 82.6, 88.2, 82.9, 84.7, 84.4, 82.2, 85.8, 97.4, 81.4, 84.4, 82.0, 93.2, 90.2, and 91.4 degrees. The Maintenance Director stated the acceptable range was 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit and said temperatures were randomly checked. When asked what interventions were provided when room temperatures were elevated, the Administrator stated thermostats were reset because some had tripped, but the surveyor was not provided documentation showing that residents with elevated room temperatures were accommodated to be made comfortable.
Incorrect MDS Coding for IV Access
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to accurately code a resident’s MDS assessment. During record review, Resident #2’s MAR showed an order for Normal Saline 10 ml IV every shift from 06/02/26 until the order was discontinued on 06/15/26, and nursing staff documented the saline flush as given through 06/13/26 on night shift. A nursing note dated 06/13/26 at 4:21 pm also stated the resident had a left arm PICC line that was flushed without difficulty. When the resident’s MDS completed after transfer to the hospital was reviewed, Section O, Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs, was coded incorrectly. The assessment review date was 06/24/26, and the MDS Coordinator denied the resident had an IV line. During interview, the MDS Coordinator described reviewing the chart, documentation, assessments, nursing notes, and resident input when needed, but after the surveyor pointed out the PICC line and IV access, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the assessment had been coded incorrectly.
Non-Functioning Resident Call Bell System
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident call bell systems were functioning properly in multiple resident rooms and bathroom/bathing areas. During observations and resident interviews, Resident #68 reported that staff response to the call light could take up to three hours and stated that the call light sometimes did not work; when the surveyor tested it, the wall unit, dome outside the room, and nurse station indicator did not activate, and the unit supervisor confirmed the malfunction. The supervisor also stated the facility had been having problems with the call system and would provide the resident with a ring bell and notify maintenance. Additional interviews and testing identified non-functioning call bells in rooms occupied by Resident #106 and Resident #74 on the 200 unit, with both residents stating their call bells had not been working for weeks to a month. Resident #106 stated the bedside portable call bell did not guarantee staff response and that he/she often walked to the doorway to find staff, while Resident #74 stated that family sometimes had to contact the facility supervisor to obtain assistance. The surveyor tested both call bells and no staff responded. Staff also stated the facility had been having issues with call bells not functioning in certain rooms for approximately three weeks, especially on the 200 and 300 units, and administration was aware of the problem. Resident #125 also reported delayed response times and a prior night when the call light was not working, although the call light functioned when tested.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
Resident #35 was observed sitting in a geriatric chair in the facility dining room with a urinary catheter in place, and the catheter tubing was uncovered and exposed in public view. During the observation, the resident was not fully clothed and did not have a blanket or sheet covering the catheter tubing while in the common dining area. A GNA who observed the resident during the interview agreed with the findings and stated, "I will take care of it." The deficiency was cited for failure to maintain the resident's dignity by leaving the catheter tubing uncovered and visible.
Failure to Accommodate Resident Preferences for Linen Changes and Out-of-Bed Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one resident who reported that GNAs on the 3 PM to 11 PM and 11 PM to 7 AM shifts were slow to respond to call bells on 05/02/2026 and 05/03/2026. The resident also stated that he/she was not ensured to be out of bed on Saturday or Sunday, and that a small portable call bell was placed on the over-bed table in the room. The resident further reported requesting linen changes because he/she frequently felt wet, but said staff would not believe him/her and refused to change the bed linens. The resident stated that in the past he/she had called the nursing supervisor, the Ombudsman, and/or 911 when clinical requests were not met. During interview, a GNA who worked both days and was assigned to the resident stated that she told the resident he/she was not wet and did not change the bed linens on two occasions. The GNA also stated that the day and evening shifts were very busy and that there may have been delays answering call bells. The ADON was unaware of the resident's concerns on the 3 PM to 11 PM and 11 PM to 7 AM shifts, and the DON was informed of the resident's report and the schedule was reviewed, confirming the GNA assignment for both days.
Delayed Medication Administration and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered and documented in accordance with physician orders, accepted standards of nursing practice, and the facility's established medication administration time parameters for two residents observed during medication pass. For one resident, medications scheduled for 9:00 AM, including aspirin 81 mg for DVT prophylaxis, a multivitamin, and vitamin B3, were not administered until approximately 10:29 AM during a medication administration observation, and the LPN stated he got a late start. For another resident, medications ordered for 8:00 AM or 9:00 AM, including hydralazine for hypertension, calcium-vitamin D, Colace, amlodipine besylate, sertraline HCL, PreserVision AREDS, and Tylenol Extra Strength, were observed being given at approximately 10:45 AM. Review of the MAR and medication reconciliation later showed these medications were not documented as administered until 5:21 PM that day. The DON acknowledged that medications are expected to be administered within the facility's acceptable timeframe and documented promptly after administration.
Failure to Post Required Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post the required nurse staffing data in a prominent place readily accessible to visitors and residents. During observational rounds on 05/03/2026 at 10:50 AM in the Long-Term Care Unit, the surveyor was unable to locate the daily data requirements for the current nurse staffing information for units 4 and 5. During interview and observation on 05/03/2026 at 10:55 AM with the manager on duty, a Daily Assignment Sheet Nursing form was found in a hard plastic sign holder on a counter behind the nursing station, which was not in a prominent place or accessible for residents and visitors in wheelchairs. The manager on duty stated that this was the wrong sheet and not the nurse staffing information, and agreed that the sign holder was not located in a prominent place and was not accessible for residents and visitors in wheelchairs.
Late Medication Administration and Delayed MAR Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and within its established medication administration time parameters for 2 of 5 residents observed during medication administration. During an observation on 5/3/26 beginning at 10:15 AM with an LPN, Resident #98 had physician-ordered medications scheduled for 9:00 AM that were not administered within the facility’s acceptable timeframe. The medications were observed being given at approximately 10:29 AM and included aspirin 81 mg by mouth for DVT prophylaxis, a multivitamin, and vitamin B3 for supplement. During another medication administration observation on 5/3/26 beginning at 10:35 AM with a different LPN, Resident #18 was observed receiving multiple medications at approximately 10:45 AM even though the MAR listed administration times of 8:00 AM or 9:00 AM. The medications included hydralazine 20 mg, calcium-vitamin D, Colace, amlodipine besylate, sertraline HCL, PreserVision AREDS, and Tylenol Extra Strength. Review of the medication administration audit record and medication reconciliation on 5/4/26 at 2:00 PM showed these medications were not documented on the MAR as administered until 5:21 PM on 5/3/26. The DON acknowledged medications are expected to be administered within the facility’s acceptable timeframe and documented promptly after administration.
Incomplete and inaccurate resident medical records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, as evidenced in 3 of 5 resident records reviewed. For Resident #12, a psychiatric evaluation and consultation note dated 04/10/2026 was reviewed and found to have no name, address, or phone number for the company that provided the service. During interview, the NHA identified the contracted psych services company and confirmed that this was the company that had provided the visit, but the information was not included on the note. A similar omission was found in Resident #83’s record, where a psychiatric evaluation and consultation note dated 03/06/2026 did not include the name, address, or phone number of the company providing the service. In addition, Resident #95’s record showed admission with a Stage II pressure ulcer on the right buttock/sacral area, but the record did not contain a corresponding physician treatment order for that area. The DON stated the resident was actually admitted with a Stage II pressure ulcer to the left buttock/sacral area and that the wound location had been incorrectly transcribed into the medical record as right instead of left.
Improper Urinary Catheter Drainage Bag Placement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to use appropriate infection control practice for resident urinary catheter care. During observation rounds on 05/03/2026 at approximately 10:47 AM, Resident #35 was observed sitting in a geriatric chair in the facility dining room with a urinary catheter in place, and the catheter drainage bag was resting directly on the floor. During an observation and interview at approximately 10:50 AM, Geriatric Nursing Assistant Staff #5 stated that the bag should not be on the floor and should be attached to the chair.
Unsafe and Unclean Environment in Resident Rooms and Laundry Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. During observation rounds, Resident #76 reported difficulty sleeping because the air system in the room abruptly came on at about 1:45 PM on 5/2/26 and remained very loud until about 7:45 AM on 5/3/26, resulting in very little sleep due to the noise level. The Nursing Home Administrator was informed of the concern and explained that the current system has one thermostat per four resident rooms and that when a vent is shut, air is shifted to another room, contributing to the loud uncomfortable sound. Resident #15’s room was observed to have three long and deep marks on the wall at the head of the bed. In the basement laundry area, surveyors noted a pungent rotten egg odor along the hallway immediately after exiting the elevator, and facility leadership stated the smell was related to a sewer issue that worsened when it was warm. In the laundry room, the clean area where dryers were located had storage cabinets with missing top fronts and exposed nails, and the dirty laundry area had cabinet baseboards torn away and dragging on the floor.
Failure to Hold Antihypertensive Medication for Low Blood Pressure
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff failed to follow a physician order to hold Amlodipine Besylate 2.5 mg when the resident’s systolic blood pressure was less than 110 mm/Hg. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including post vascular surgery, arthritis, and hypertension and required assistance from nursing staff for some aspects of care. The closed medical record showed an order dated 08/09/25 directing the medication to be given once daily and held for systolic blood pressure readings below 110 mm/Hg. Review of the August and September 2025 MARs showed the medication was administered at 9 AM on multiple occasions when the resident’s blood pressure was below that threshold, including readings of 109/74, 106/70, 109/70, and 100/60. During interview, Staff Nurse #1 stated the doses should have been withheld on those dates because the blood pressure readings were less than 110 mm/Hg.
Food Safety Deficiency in Nourishment Room Refrigerators
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the safety of food items in two nourishment room refrigerators, which could potentially lead to foodborne illness. During a surveyor's tour, a large zip-lock bag with cooked food items and an uncooked cauliflower, both dated 03/08/25, were found in a refrigerator near the 400-unit Nurses' station. The cauliflower was brown to black in color, indicating spoilage. An LPN validated these findings and removed the items. Additionally, apple sauce dated 03/08/25 was found in another refrigerator near the 200-unit Nurses' station, which was also validated and removed by a unit secretary. An interview with the LPN revealed that food brought from outside the facility for residents should be dated and stored for no more than three days, indicating that the items found were past their safe storage period. The Infection Preventionist reviewed and validated these concerns.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by not covering the urinary drainage bag during transport to and from rehabilitation activities. This deficiency was identified during a recertification/complaint survey for a resident with a Foley catheter. On the initial tour, the resident was observed with a urinary drainage bag partially filled with urine hanging under the bed. Later, the resident was seen being wheeled back to their room in a wheelchair by a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA), with the urinary bag uncovered. In an interview, the COTA acknowledged that the urinary bag should have been covered with a dignity bag during transport and stated that it was the nurses' responsibility to apply the dignity bag. The acting Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility provides leaf bags to conceal urinary drainage bags during transport and that residents should not be transported without them. The DON was made aware of the concern and indicated she would investigate the issue.
Resident Abuse Incident Involving GNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) and a resident. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, reported that the GNA slapped the back of their hand during care. This incident occurred when the resident reached towards their Foley catheter while asking a question. The facility's investigation included statements from the resident, the GNA, and other staff members. The resident's account was deemed credible, while the GNA's account contained conflicting information. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the allegation of abuse was substantiated, leading to the termination of the GNA. The Human Resource Director explained the facility's process for handling abuse allegations, which includes suspending the staff member during the investigation and terminating employment if the allegation is substantiated. The investigation concluded that the GNA's actions constituted a violation, resulting in the resident's perception of abuse.
Failure to Timely Report Allegation of Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse within the required 2-hour timeframe to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This deficiency was identified during a recertification/complaint survey for a resident who reported being hit by a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) after the resident admitted to punching the GNA. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the allegation at 3:00 PM, and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was informed at 4:50 PM on the same day. However, the initial self-report of the allegation was not submitted to the State Survey Agency until 6:13 PM, which was more than 3 hours after the facility staff were made aware of the incident. During interviews, the NHA confirmed that the facility's procedure requires any allegation of abuse to be reported within two hours, regardless of substantiation. The discrepancy in reporting times was verified through documentation and email confirmation receipts, which showed the report was submitted later than the required timeframe. The DON admitted to submitting the report late, explaining that she had to rush home to do so, acknowledging the facility's failure to comply with the 2-hour reporting requirement.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Frequent UTIs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to initiate and develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident who had frequent urinary tract infections (UTIs). The medical record review revealed that the resident had multiple UTIs and was treated with antibiotics on several occasions, including Keflex, Cipro, and Bactrim. Despite these recurring infections, the care plan did not address the risks and prevention strategies for UTIs. Interviews with facility staff, including Social Services and the Infection Preventionist, confirmed that care plans are conducted regularly, with individual departments responsible for initiating and revising them. However, it was validated that the resident's care plan lacked specific measures for managing and preventing frequent UTIs, indicating a deficiency in the facility's care planning process.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident #13, who was admitted with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, was observed without a required bolster for left arm contracture. Despite having a medical order for the bolster, the care plan did not include this intervention, and the last revision of the care plan was dated 08/21/23. This oversight was confirmed by the unit manager and the Infection Preventionist. Similarly, Resident #35, who was receiving long-term care, had a medical order for non-pharmacological interventions to be attempted before administering PRN pain medication. However, the care plan, last revised on 08/21/23, did not reflect these interventions. This deficiency was also validated by the Infection Preventionist. Both cases highlight the facility's failure to ensure that care plans were accurately updated to reflect current medical orders and interventions.
Failure to Use Prescribed Bolster for Resident's Contracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide resident-centered care in accordance with the resident's goals and professional standards of practice, as evidenced by the case of a resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction. The resident, who was admitted for long-term care, had a documented order for a soft bolster to be used for left arm positioning related to contracture. This order specified the placement of the bolster to ensure proper positioning and airflow. However, during the survey, it was observed that the resident's left arm contracture was not being treated with the prescribed bolster or any similar device. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the bolster was not consistently used as ordered. An LPN admitted to not seeing the bolster in use during medication administration and mentioned that a folded pillow was sometimes used instead. The unit manager confirmed the existence of the bolster order but acknowledged the use of a folded pillow. Additionally, the Infection Preventionist verified that the bolster was found in the resident's closet, indicating it was not in use as required. This lack of adherence to the prescribed care plan resulted in a deficiency in meeting the resident's physical needs.
Failure to Provide Nonpharmacological Interventions Before Pain Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for Resident #35, as evidenced by the lack of nonpharmacological interventions prior to administering pain medication. The medical record review revealed that pain medications, including Acetaminophen and Oxycodone, were administered to the resident without any documented attempts to offer nonpharmacological interventions, such as repositioning or offering a warm beverage, as required by the physician's orders. This deficiency was identified during the recertification/complaint survey. Interviews with the staff, including Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), confirmed that pain medications were given after assessing the resident's pain but without ensuring that nonpharmacological methods were attempted first. The Infection Preventionist also validated that the PRN medications were administered without offering these interventions. This oversight in pain management practices was evident for Resident #35, who was one of the two residents reviewed for pain management during the survey.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,926 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 14 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Gambrills
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crofton | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 29 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Severna Park Llc | 6.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Future Care Annapolis | 6.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Larkin Chase Center | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 2 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Autumn Lake Healthcare At Waugh Chapel.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.