Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crofton during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Unsanitary food prep and storage area with ongoing condensation. Surveyors observed black substances on the wall and ceiling above the coffee and tea maker, with steam from the machine causing condensation in the same area. Mugs, plates, silverware, and tea pitchers were stored or handled on and around the ice machine and nearby table beneath the condensation, and no ventilation system or condensate hood was observed.
Infection Control Lapses in Laundry and Soiled Linen Areas: During survey observations, the biohazard room door and the soiled linen room door were both found propped open despite signage and staff confirmation that they should remain closed. The Housekeeping Supervisor was also observed handling soiled linens with bare hands instead of gloves. The IP acknowledged the concerns, and the DON stated that staff education would be provided.
A resident was administered medications by a staff member despite their verbal refusal, with a witness confirming the resident was given medications not prescribed to them. The DON questioned the classification of the incident as abuse, but the surveyor clarified that administering medication after refusal is considered abuse.
Three residents experienced deficiencies in care, including delayed treatment for a new eye complaint, lack of access to a critical digestive medication resulting in inability to eat, and repeated failure by staff to follow physician orders for blood pressure measurement sites in a resident with dialysis access. Staff did not consistently document or communicate clinical concerns, failed to ensure medication availability, and did not adhere to posted and charted care instructions.
A significant medication error occurred when a staff member administered losartan and gabapentin to a resident who was not prescribed these medications, despite the resident's verbal refusal and confusion. The incident was witnessed by another staff member, and the error was later confirmed through documentation and interviews with facility leadership.
A resident’s rights were not maintained when a GNA entered the room without knocking first, despite the expectation to knock and wait for a response. In a separate event, a resident with a Foley catheter was observed in bed with the urine bag visible and no dignity bag in place; an LPN, GNA, and DON all stated urine bags were expected to be covered at all times.
The facility failed to keep copies of a resident's medical POA and another resident's advance directive in the chart. Staff said advance directives are discussed at admission and copies are requested from the resident or family, but one resident's record had no healthcare POA and another resident's paper and electronic records had no advance directive on file, despite a social service note stating the resident had one at home.
An unattended med cart with a laptop was observed in a public hallway with the screen on, open, and not locked or turned off, leaving resident medical records unsecured and confidential information visible. Staff stated the expectation was to lock the screen whenever walking away, and the CMA logged into the laptop said he had been pulled away and forgot to lock it. The DON reviewed the concern and acknowledged it.
A resident with no cognitive impairment and admitted for mobility and ADL dysfunction reported a missing credit card and fraudulent charges. Facility staff could not determine who took the card when the investigation was completed, and the file later showed an agency GNA was reported to the state licensing board after an address linked to the GNA was found near the locations where the card was used.
Failure to implement abuse prevention policies. The facility’s abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy did not address how to prevent abuse by agency staff or ensure reporting of abuse allegations and injuries of unknown source. One resident later reported a missing credit card with fraudulent charges after an agency GNA worked a shift, and in another event an agency LPN failed to report a resident’s large bruise of unknown source to supervision or Administration.
Failure to Provide Transfer/Discharge Notice: A resident was transferred to the hospital after falls and related injuries, but the record did not show a properly completed transfer/discharge notice for one hospitalization. Staff interviews confirmed uncertainty about whether the resident or RP received the notice, and the NHA acknowledged the RP was not sent one even though both should have received it.
A resident’s MDS was coded inaccurately when two documented falls were not entered on the assessment. An MDS coordinator acknowledged the omission after review, and the DON was informed of the concern.
Failure to Develop Care Plan for Anemia: A resident with anemia and a recent hospital transfer for low Hgb/Hct did not have a care plan addressing the diagnosis in the EHR. The UM and DON stated that nurses and unit managers were responsible for initiating baseline care plans and that care plans should address all diagnoses, but the omission was confirmed during the survey review.
Failure to Invite Primary Health Care Representative to Care Plan Meetings: A resident’s primary HC representative was not invited to quarterly care plan meetings. The SW sent invitations only to the backup representative, who repeatedly declined to attend, while the primary agent listed in the AD was not contacted despite having a phone number on file. The resident’s representative reported not attending a care plan meeting since the prior year.
Failure to provide and document resident activities according to preferences. A resident who liked reading stated he/she did not participate in activities, and no books were present at the bedside during the interview. The care plan listed preferred leisure activities such as reading magazines, jazz music, pet therapy, TV programs, and word searches, but the ADON/activity staff acknowledged the resident’s preferences were not documented and activity logs were largely blank, with only one activity recorded.
Oxygen care was not provided consistently for two residents receiving O2 therapy. One resident had undated oxygen tubing, and an LPN stated she did not know when it had last been changed. Another resident’s tubing remained dated beyond the weekly change schedule despite an order and facility policy requiring weekly tubing changes and dating after each change. The DON confirmed staff were expected to follow the order and policy.
A resident with a BIMS score of 15 refused the pneumococcal vaccine, but the record contained no documentation that education on the risks and benefits of the vaccine was provided after the refusal. The IP confirmed the missing documentation and stated the facility expected vaccine education to be given and documented whether a resident accepted or declined; the DON also acknowledged that residents are expected to be educated after refusing vaccines.
Missing Effective Communication Training for Agency Direct Care Staff: Record review showed that a GNA did not have documentation of completed effective communication training among the staff training records reviewed. The DON stated the agency was expected to provide training for agency staff, had no further training to provide for the GNA, and confirmed there was no process in place to ensure all required training was completed for agency staff, including effective communication training.
Mandatory QAPI training was not documented for one GNA reviewed, and the DON stated the agency was expected to provide staff training and that no further training was available for that staff member. The DON also said there was no process in place to ensure all required training was completed by agency staff, including QAPI training.
Failure to ensure required compliance and ethics training was completed for an agency GNA. Record review showed no documentation that the staff member completed the training, and the DON stated the agency was expected to provide it. The DON also stated there was no process in place to ensure all required training was completed by agency staff, including training not provided by the agency.
Unsanitary food prep and storage area with ongoing condensation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a proper sanitary environment in a food and equipment preparation/storage area during multiple kitchen observations. On the initial tour, black substances were seen on the wall above the kitchen coffee and tea maker and on the ceiling panels above it. The coffee and tea maker was producing steam, condensation was observed on the wall and ceiling above the ice machine, coffee and tea machine, and the table where silverware was being stored, and no ventilation system or condensate hood was observed in the area. Mugs with plastic lids were stored on top of the ice machine, and silverware was stored on the table next to the coffee and tea maker in the same area where the condensation and black substance were observed. During later observations, condensation continued to be seen on the ceiling panels above the coffee and tea maker while steam was coming from the machine. Mugs with lids and plates were again observed stored on top of the ice maker next to the tea and coffee maker, and a dietary staff aide was observed rolling silverware on the table next to the coffee and tea maker underneath the condensation. Plates stored on top of the ice maker beneath the condensation were later taken and placed in the plate warmer for lunch tray service, and tea pitchers were placed on the table next to the coffee and tea maker with condensation still noted on the ceiling above them.
Infection Control Lapses in Laundry and Soiled Linen Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices in the laundry area during the recertification survey. During observation of the laundry room, a door with signage stating, "Keep Door Closed and Do Not Prop Doors Open" was observed propped open. In an interview, the Housekeeping Supervisor stated that the biohazard room contained biohazard waste in a red hazard bin and acknowledged that the door was not supposed to be propped open at any time, then closed it and confirmed it should not have been left open. During a tour of the soiled laundry room, the door was observed open, and the Housekeeping Supervisor was seen picking up three soiled linens with her bare hands and placing them in a dirty-linen bin. When asked, she stated that gloves were required but she had forgotten. She also confirmed that the soiled room door was expected to always remain closed. Later, the Infection Preventionist stated she was responsible for infection control practices in conjunction with department heads and acknowledged the concerns regarding the propped biohazard room door, the propped soiled linen room door, and the handling of soiled linen without gloves. The DON stated that staff education would be provided.
Failure to Protect Resident from Abuse During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
A facility failed to protect a resident from abuse when a staff member administered medications to a resident who had refused them. According to the facility-reported incident, a staff member was alleged to have shoved incorrect medications into the resident's mouth despite the resident's verbal refusal. Progress notes indicated that the resident inadvertently received losartan and gabapentin, which were not prescribed to them. A witness statement from another staff member confirmed that the resident was yelling and questioning the medications being given, explicitly refusing them. The staff member proceeded to put a spoon in the resident's mouth and administered the medications. The witness then informed the staff member that the medications given were not prescribed for the resident, confirming a medication administration error. The Director of Nursing was interviewed and questioned the classification of the incident as abuse, but the surveyor clarified that administering medication after a resident's refusal constitutes abuse.
Failure to Provide Timely Treatment, Medication, and Adherence to Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders, resident preferences, and goals in three separate incidents involving three residents. In the first incident, a resident reported experiencing crusting and itching in the eyes to an LPN, who verbally informed the attending physician but did not document the concern in the electronic health record or follow up when the physician did not immediately address the issue. The physician was unaware of the complaint during the initial visit and only addressed the concern days later after being informed. The lack of documentation and follow-up resulted in a delay in treatment for the resident's eye symptoms. In the second incident, a resident with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and a prescription for Zenpep (pancrelipase) to aid digestion was admitted to the facility but did not receive the medication as ordered. The medication was not available upon admission, and the resident was unable to eat during the entire stay. Although the pharmacy notified the facility via fax that the medication was unavailable and required a dose change, there was no evidence that staff followed up with the physician or nurse practitioner. The resident left the facility the next day, having not received the necessary medication or food for 19 hours. In the third incident, a resident with a history of hemodialysis and recent AV graft placement had clear physician orders and signage indicating that blood pressure measurements should only be taken on the lower extremities, not the arms. Despite these orders, staff documented 27 instances of blood pressure measurements taken on the resident's arms after the orders were in place. Interviews revealed that staff were either unaware of the orders or did not follow them, and documentation errors were also noted. These failures demonstrate a lack of adherence to physician orders and proper communication among staff regarding resident care requirements.
Significant Medication Error Due to Improper Administration
Penalty
Summary
A significant medication error occurred when a staff member administered losartan 100 mg and gabapentin 100 mg to a resident who was not prescribed these medications. The incident was observed by another staff member, who witnessed the resident verbally refusing the medication and questioning what was being given. Despite the resident's refusal and expressed confusion, the staff member proceeded to place a spoon in the resident's mouth and administered the medications. The error was later confirmed through review of the resident's progress notes and staff interviews. The provider documented that the resident inadvertently received the medications and outlined the symptoms to monitor as a result. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the medication error was substantiated, while the associated abuse allegation was deemed inconclusive. The incident was identified during a review of a facility-reported incident and corroborated by a witness statement from another staff member.
Resident Privacy and Dignity Not Maintained
Penalty
Summary
Resident rights were not maintained when a GNA entered Resident #69’s room without knocking first. During an interview, the resident was observed in the room when the staff member walked in without announcing entry. When questioned, the GNA stated the expectation was to knock and wait for the resident’s response, and the DON later confirmed that staff were expected to knock on every resident’s door before entering at a level the resident could hear. Resident dignity was not protected when Resident #102 was observed in bed with a Foley catheter and the urine bag visible. During a dual observation, an LPN confirmed that no dignity bag was in place and stated that residents with Foley catheters and urine bags were to have dignity bags and that urine bags should not be visible. Additional interviews with a GNA and the DON confirmed that urine bags were expected to be covered at all times, whether residents were in bed or in chairs.
Missing Advance Directive and POA Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that copies of a resident's medical power of attorney and another resident's advance directive were present in the medical record. For Resident #25, the medical record showed that on 07/13/23 the social worker completed an initial assessment noting the resident had an advance directive and that the family would be asked to provide healthcare POA information for the chart, but review of both the electronic medical record and paper chart did not show evidence of a healthcare POA. During interviews, social work staff explained that advance directives are discussed at admission and that residents or representatives are asked to provide copies, but the facility did not have healthcare POA documents for Resident #25. For Resident #40, review of the paper chart and electronic health record showed no advance directive on file. A social service note dated 07/21/2025 stated that the resident reported having an advance directive at home with a will and that follow-up with family would be attempted to obtain a copy for the chart. During interview, staff stated that advance directives are placed in the chart and uploaded to the electronic record, but when asked about this resident, staff confirmed the resident did not have one in the record and acknowledged that follow-up with the son had not resulted in obtaining or documenting the document. The DON was informed of these findings and acknowledged them.
Unattended Open Laptop Exposed Resident Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident medical records were maintained secure and confidential when an unattended medication cart with a laptop on top of it was observed in the 400 hallway, an area used by residents, staff, and visitors. The laptop screen was on, open, and slightly pointed downward toward the public hallway, and it was not locked or turned off while the cart was left unattended. The same condition was observed again several minutes later in the same location. When interviewed, a GNA stated staff were expected to lock the computer screen every time they walked away and identified the CMA who was logged in on the computer. The CMA later stated staff were expected to lock laptop screens when walking away and said he must have been pulled away and forgot to lock the screen. The DON reviewed the concern and understood it was a concern.
Misappropriation of Resident Property
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was free from misappropriation of property. Resident #195 had been in the facility for less than 2 weeks, had no cognitive impairment on the MDS, and was admitted for mobility and ADL dysfunction. The resident reported that a credit card was missing and stated the last time it had been seen was several days earlier. The resident also contacted the credit card company and identified fraudulent charges made on the card. The facility investigation file showed that one employee reported last seeing the resident with the credit card, but the facility could not determine who took it when the final report was completed. The Nursing Home Administrator stated that staff interviewed employees and reviewed whether any of them lived near the locations where the card was used. The file later showed that an agency GNA was reported to the state licensing board for misappropriation of resident property after the facility learned of an address associated with the GNA near the locations where the card was used.
Failure to Implement Abuse Prevention Policies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement abuse prevention policies and procedures. A review of the policy titled, "Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation," showed it was dated 11/13/23 as reviewed, but it did not include a date of implementation. Although the policy stated that the facility would provide protection, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, it did not address how the facility would prevent abuse by agency staff or ensure that allegations of abuse and injuries of unknown source were reported. In one incident, an agency GNA worked one shift and was assigned to a resident who later reported a missing credit card; fraudulent charges were identified beginning the day after the shift. The NHA stated that the facility checked whether staff lived near the locations where the card was used and later discovered the GNA had a different address than the one in the agency paperwork, with the new address across the street from one location where the card was used and within a mile of the other locations. In a separate incident, an agency LPN was told by a GNA that a resident had a large bruise of unknown source, but the nurse did not report it to a supervisor or Administration. The DON stated the facility contacted the agency and asked that nurse not be sent back, but the policy had not addressed how agency staff would be educated on abuse and the facility’s abuse policies and procedures.
Failure to Provide Transfer/Discharge Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a notice of transfer/discharge to a resident and/or the resident’s responsible party for one resident reviewed for the discharge process. Resident #71 stated that he/she had fallen twice and was sent to the hospital. The electronic record showed the resident was transferred to the hospital for shoulder swelling and shaking, and again on 08/30/2025 due to bleeding on the left brow and a skin tear after a fall. Review of the electronic record showed a transfer/discharge notice for the earlier hospitalization, but no hospital transfer notification was found for the 08/30/2025 hospitalization. Review of the paper chart showed a notice of transfer form dated 08/30/2025 that did not include the name of the responsible party, the discharge location, or the resident’s and/or responsible party’s acknowledgement signature and date. Staff interviews showed the Unit Manager was unsure whether the resident or responsible party received a notice for the transfer, and the DON and NHA described a process in which the notice would be completed and sent with the resident and a copy provided or mailed to the responsible party. When asked specifically about this resident’s transfer, the NHA stated she did not send a notice to the responsible party because the resident returned the same day, and acknowledged that both the resident and responsible party should have received the notice and that the form was not duly completed.
Inaccurate MDS Coding of Resident Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to code a resident’s status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Resident #122 was interviewed and reported having had a recent fall. Review of the medical record showed the resident had falls on 07/18/2025 and 08/20/2025, but the MDS dated [DATE] did not code those falls. During interviews, an MDS coordinator stated that falls occurring after the last resident assessment would be coded on the following assessment, and another MDS coordinator acknowledged that the resident’s two falls were not coded on the MDS. The Director of Nursing was also informed of the concern and understood it.
Failure to Develop Care Plan for Anemia
Penalty
Summary
A comprehensive care plan was not developed for a resident with anemia. Record review showed the resident had a diagnosis of anemia and had been transferred to the hospital for low hemoglobin and hematocrit, but the care plan in the electronic health record did not address the anemia diagnosis. The surveyor reviewed the record and found no initial care plan in place for the condition. During interviews, the Unit Manager stated that nurses were responsible for initiating baseline care plans and that all residents should have care plans started at admission and updated as appropriate. The DON also stated that nurses and unit managers were responsible for initiating care plans and that residents should have care plans addressing all diagnoses. After being informed of the omission, the DON confirmed the resident had anemia and that no care plan addressed the condition in the record.
Failure to Invite Primary Health Care Representative to Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure Resident #13’s primary health care representative was invited to care plan meetings. During a phone interview, the resident’s healthcare representative #1 stated that the last care plan meeting attended was in the previous year. Review of the medical record showed that quarterly care plan invitations were electronically sent to healthcare representative #2 on 01/08/25, 04/04/25, and 07/02/25, and that quarterly care plan meetings were held on 11/12/24, 02/11/25, 05/13/25, and 08/12/25. For each meeting, the social worker documented that healthcare representative #2 declined to attend. During interviews, the social worker explained the facility’s process for care plan meetings, including the required attendees and the rights of residents and their representatives. When questioned about why invitations were sent only to healthcare representative #2 and not to healthcare representative #1, the social worker stated that the email address listed in the resident’s chart was used and was unable to explain why healthcare representative #1 was not contacted after repeated declines by healthcare representative #2. Review of the advance directive showed that healthcare representative #1 was the designated primary healthcare agent, with healthcare representative #2 listed as the backup agent if the primary agent could not be reached.
Failure to Provide and Document Resident Activity Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and document activities in accordance with resident preferences for one resident reviewed for activities. During an interview, the resident stated he/she did not participate in any activity and reported liking reading. The resident said books were brought by his/her daughter, and no books were present at the bedside at the time of the interview and observation. The resident’s care plan, initiated on 06/27/2025, included a goal for the resident to choose a leisure pastime within comfortable abilities through self-directed activities and scheduled group programs, with interventions listing reading magazines, listening to jazz music, pet therapy or animal visits, watching TV programs, and completing word searches and crossword puzzles independently. The Activity Director stated the resident was short term and had not attended any group activities, and that residents who declined group activities were offered independent materials such as magazines. She stated the resident was given magazines, but acknowledged that documentation had not been completed and that the resident’s activity preferences were not documented. Review of three months of activity logs showed only one documented activity, salon services on 07/18/2025, with the remaining records blank. The Nursing Home Administrator stated each resident should have a participation record reflecting activities of interest and that documentation should reflect attendance or refusal of activities.
Oxygen Tubing Not Dated or Changed per Protocol
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for residents receiving oxygen therapy. During the initial tour, one resident was observed seated in a chair with oxygen via nasal cannula connected to oxygen tubing that was not dated. An LPN later stated she did not know when the tubing had last been changed and said she would have known if it had been dated. She also stated the tubing was supposed to be dated after each change. Another LPN stated oxygen tubing should be changed weekly, the humidifier should be changed when it is less than one-quarter full, and the tubing should be dated immediately after changing. A second resident was observed receiving oxygen therapy in bed, and the resident's oxygen tubing was dated 9/9/25. The resident's order directed staff to maintain O2 equipment and change it weekly on Monday night shift, with new tubing labeled with the date per protocol. The facility's oxygen administration policy stated oxygen tubing and mask/cannula should be changed weekly and as needed if soiled or contaminated. When the tubing was later observed again, it was still labeled 9/9/25. The Administrator confirmed the finding, and the DON stated staff should be following the resident's orders and the facility policy for oxygen tubing changes.
Failure to Document Vaccine Refusal Education
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were educated on the benefits and risks of the pneumococcal vaccine after refusal. This deficiency was identified for 1 resident out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Resident #40 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognitive intactness, and the immunization record showed that the resident refused the pneumococcal vaccine. On review of the record on 09/24/2025, there was no documentation that education regarding the risks and benefits of the pneumococcal vaccine was provided after the refusal. During interview, the Infection Preventionist stated the facility expected education to be provided and documented whether a resident consents or declines, and confirmed that Resident #40's record did not show such education. The DON also stated residents are expected to be educated on the risks and benefits of vaccines following refusal.
Missing Effective Communication Training for Agency Direct Care Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all direct care staff received effective communication training. Record review showed that Geriatric Nursing Assistant Staff #38 did not have documentation of completed effective communication training among the training records reviewed for 5 staff members. During interview, the DON stated that the expectation was for the agency to provide training for agency staff and said she had no further training to provide for Staff #38. She also stated that there was no process in place to ensure that all required training was completed by agency staff, including effective communication training, and that this training was not on the list of educational trainings completed for Staff #38.
Failure to Ensure Mandatory QAPI Training for Agency Staff
Penalty
Summary
Mandatory QAPI training was not completed for all staff, as record review showed that one Geriatric Nursing Assistant, Staff #38, did not have documentation of QAPI training among the five staff reviewed for training compliance. The report states that QAPI training is intended to inform staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. During interview, the DON said the expectation was that the agency provided training for agency staff and that she had no further training to provide for Staff #38. The DON also stated there was no process in place to ensure that all required training was completed by agency staff, including training not provided by the agency, such as QAPI training.
Failure to Ensure Required Compliance and Ethics Training for Agency Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff received the required compliance and ethics training for 1 of 5 staff reviewed, specifically Geriatric Nursing Assistant Staff #38. Record review on 09/23/2025 at 1:20 PM did not reveal documentation that Staff #38 had completed compliance and ethics training. When the surveyor reviewed the concern with the DON on 09/23/2025 at 1:27 PM, the DON stated the expectation was that the agency provided training for agency staff. The DON also stated she had no further training to provide for Staff #38 and that there was no process in place to ensure all required training was completed by agency staff, including training not provided by the agency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,881 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 14 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Crofton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Waugh Chapel | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 48 | 0 |
| Larkin Chase Center | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 2 |
| Future Care Annapolis | 5.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Cove | 7.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crofton.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.