Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Administer Ordered Vaginal Cream: A resident with postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis, DM2, and intact cognition had a physician order for daily estradiol vaginal cream for vaginal irritation, but the MAR showed multiple missed doses. The resident reported burning, itching, and severe pain with voiding, and the ADON, MD, and DON acknowledged the cream was not given as ordered.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded Threshold: An LPN administered medications during observed passes for two residents, but several ordered meds were not given during the observation and were later administered after the surveyor had finished observing. For one resident, three eye/nasal meds were missed during the pass; for another resident, estradiol vaginal cream was missed. The facility’s medication error rate was 14.29%, with 4 errors out of 28 opportunities.
The facility failed to provide written advance directive information to two residents upon admission, and the records for both residents lacked documentation showing that the residents or their representatives received the required information. The S3 admission coordinator stated that printed material regarding advance directives is supposed to be provided at admission but could not locate documentation for either resident.
Care plan not revised for repeated medication refusal. A resident with COPD, malnutrition, dementia, and muscle wasting/atrophy repeatedly refused Estrace vaginal cream, with the MAR showing multiple refusals over two months. The MDS coded rejection of care as not exhibited, and the DON stated that consistent refusal of medication or treatment should be reflected in the care plan.
A resident with CVA history, blindness, and moderately impaired cognition was supposed to receive supervision or touch assistance with eating, but staff did not provide meal assistance. During observation, the resident could not identify the food on the tray or gather food onto a spoon, and the RD agreed the resident should have had help during meals. The resident also had a 6.12-pound weight loss in one month.
Open PEG Tubing Found Without Cap or Cover: An LPN observed a resident’s PEG tube disconnected, with the gastrostomy tubing open and the cap or cover lying on the floor. The resident had diagnoses including gastrostomy status, dysphagia, right hemiplegia, cerebral ischemia, type 2 DM, aphasia, gastroenteritis, and cerebrovascular disease, and was ordered enhanced barrier precautions for PEG tube care.
A CNA transferred a dependent resident using a stand and pivot method instead of the required Hoyer lift, as outlined in the care plan. The resident, who had significant physical limitations and was dependent for transfers, sustained a right humeral neck fracture after hitting her arm on the wheelchair armrest during the improper transfer. The CNA was unaware of the resident's transfer requirements and did not check the care plan or observe signage indicating the need for a Hoyer lift.
A resident with multiple diagnoses and total dependence for transfers was moved from bed to wheelchair by an agency CNA without the use of a Hoyer lift, contrary to the care plan and facility policy. The CNA used a stand and pivot method, despite being trained and having access to the care plan, and supervisory staff confirmed the required procedure was not followed. This failure to provide the necessary transfer assistance constituted neglect.
The facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices for two residents by leaving medications at the bedside without orders for self-administration. Both residents, with intact cognition, were found with medication cups on their bedside tables. Interviews with staff confirmed the breach in protocol, as nurses acknowledged leaving medications unattended and not staying with residents until administration was complete.
The facility failed to provide proper respiratory care for two residents. One resident's humidification bottle and nasal cannula were not changed weekly as ordered, while another resident's oxygen setup lacked a humidification bottle and dated tubing. An LPN confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary dietary services, as improper thawing practices for meat were observed. Meat was found submerged in standing water instead of being thawed under running water, as confirmed by staff members. The Dietary Manager reported that 121 residents were served meal trays from the kitchen during the observed days.
The facility did not submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing to CMS, resulting in a One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. The Regional President confirmed a PBJ system reporting error for the specified period.
A resident with multiple medical conditions, including Alzheimer's, was injured during a transfer when a CNA failed to use a Hoyer lift as required by the care plan. The resident suffered a severe leg injury, exposing bone and adipose tissue, necessitating surgical intervention. Video evidence contradicted the CNA's claim of leaving to get the lift, revealing a breach in protocol.
A resident with multiple health conditions, including Alzheimer's, was injured during a transfer when a CNA failed to use a Hoyer lift as required by the care plan. The CNA left the resident unattended, resulting in a severe leg injury. Video evidence contradicted the CNA's claim of retrieving the lift, highlighting a breach in protocol.
A cognitively impaired resident with a history of elopement was inaccurately assessed as not at risk and subsequently eloped from the facility. The resident exited through an unsecured front entrance after the evening receptionist, unaware of the resident's status, remotely opened the doors. The facility's lack of communication and security measures, including an unattended front desk and absence of a wander guard system, contributed to the incident.
A cognitively impaired resident eloped from the facility due to inadequate risk assessment and security measures. The resident exited through the front doors, which were remotely opened by the receptionist, and was not missed until 90 minutes later. The ADON failed to assess the resident's elopement risk accurately, missing key information from the family. The facility lacked a secure entrance and did not have a wander guard system, contributing to the incident.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment eloped from a facility due to an inaccurate elopement risk assessment by the ADON, who failed to interview the family and missed critical information about the resident's history of elopement. The resident exited the facility after the evening receptionist, unaware of the resident's risk status, released the doors. The DON confirmed the assessment was inaccurate, and the ADON later acknowledged changing answers on the evaluation post-elopement.
The facility failed to document and investigate a grievance reported by a resident's family member regarding the resident being repeatedly found in a soiled brief. The administrator admitted that quickly resolved issues were not logged, violating the facility's grievance policy.
Failure to Administer Ordered Vaginal Cream
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a physician order for estradiol vaginal cream for one resident with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis, unilateral primary osteoarthritis of the right hip, and polyneuropathy. The resident’s quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The comprehensive care plan identified that the resident was frequently to always incontinent of bowel and bladder and included interventions initiated on 05/07/2024 to monitor for signs and symptoms of UTI, including pain, burning, and urinary frequency. A physician order dated 07/23/2025 directed estradiol vaginal cream 0.1 mg/gm, 1 application vaginally daily for vaginal irritation related to postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis. Review of the February 2026 MAR showed the cream was not documented as administered on multiple dates throughout the month. During interview, the resident reported the cream had been ordered to help with burning and itching and stated she had not received it in months and had pain rated 8.5 to 9 out of 10 when voiding. The ADON, MD, and DON each reviewed the MAR and acknowledged the resident had not received the daily vaginal cream as ordered.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater, with a 14.29% medication error rate identified from 4 medication errors out of 28 opportunities. During observation of the medication pass for Resident #19, S2LPN administered 13 oral medications, but review of the resident’s current physician orders and MAR showed that three medications due at 9:00 a.m. on 02/23/2026 had not been given during the observed pass: fluticasone propionate 50 mcg/at 1 spray in each nostril twice daily, olopatadine HCl solution 0.1% 1 drop in the right eye daily, and cyclosporine emulsion 0.05% 1 drop in both eyes twice daily. In an interview later that morning, S2LPN acknowledged she administered those medications after the medication pass observation had ended and acknowledged she should have notified the surveyor to observe the administrations. During observation of the medication pass for Resident #47, S2LPN administered 11 oral medications, but review of the resident’s current physician orders and MAR showed estradiol vaginal cream 0.1 mg/gm, 1 application vaginally daily, due at 9:00 a.m. on 02/23/2026, had not been given during the observed pass. In interview, S2LPN acknowledged she administered the estradiol vaginal cream after the medication pass observation had been completed.
Failure to Provide Advance Directive Information on Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform and provide written information to residents or their representatives concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 48 sampled residents, identified in the report as Residents #38 and #96. The facility policy titled "Advance Directives" stated that upon admission, residents are to be provided written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if they choose to do so. Review of Resident #38's medical record showed an admission date of 02/17/2025, but the record did not contain documentation that the resident or the resident's representative was provided written information concerning advance directives. Review of Resident #96's medical record showed an admission date of 07/15/2024, and likewise did not reveal documentation that the resident or representative was provided written information concerning advance directives. During interview on 02/24/2026 at 2:53 p.m., the S3 admission coordinator stated it was the facility's policy to provide printed material regarding advance directives upon admission and confirmed she could not locate documentation that either resident received this information.
Care Plan Not Revised for Repeated Medication Refusal
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise Resident #31’s care plan to reflect repeated refusal of Estrace Vaginal Cream. Resident #31 was admitted on 09/02/2020 with diagnoses including muscle wasting atrophy, COPD, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and unspecified dementia, and had a Quarterly MDS showing a BIMS of 13 with intact cognition. The record also showed the resident’s MDS coded rejection of care as 0 on both the Quarterly and Discharge assessments, indicating the behavior was not exhibited. A physician order dated 06/18/2024 directed Estrace Vaginal Cream 0.1 mg/g, 1 application vaginally at bedtime, and the January and February 2026 MARs documented multiple refusals of the medication on numerous dates in both months. During interview, the DON stated that if a resident consistently refuses medication or treatment, the care plan should be reviewed and revised to include refusal of medication/treatment.
Failure to Provide Meal Assistance for a Blind Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide nutritional and hydration care and services for Resident #57, who had a history of CVA x2, visuospatial deficit and spatial neglect following cerebral infarction, blindness, and a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident’s comprehensive plan of care identified an eating deficit requiring supervision or touch assistance due to blindness and CVA, and the RD documentation noted the resident needed help during mealtimes and recommended total assistance during meals after observing subcutaneous fat loss and muscle wasting. During interview and observation, Resident #57 stated he did not know what he had to eat because he was blind and no one had told him what was on his plate. At the meal observation, the resident was trying to feed himself but could not gather food onto his spoon and was unable to eat the items on the tray, which included corn, green peas, ice cream, rice, iced tea, and water. The CNA later stated the resident could feed himself, while the RD agreed the resident should have had assistance with meals. The resident’s weights showed a 6.12-pound loss in one month, from 176.4 pounds to 165.6 pounds.
Open PEG Tubing Found Without Cap or Cover
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to use infection control standards of practice for 1 resident reviewed for nutrition when Resident #7’s gastrostomy tubing was found without a cap or cover attached to the feeding pump tubing and laying on the floor. During observation on 02/23/2026 at 12:50 p.m. with an LPN, Resident #7’s PEG tube was disconnected, the gastrostomy tubing extending from the abdomen was open, and the cap or cover was on the floor. The LPN removed the cap or cover from the floor and attached it to the resident’s gastrostomy tube. Resident #7’s record showed diagnoses including gastrostomy status, dysphagia, right hemiplegia, cerebral ischemia, type 2 diabetes, aphasia, gastroenteritis, and cerebrovascular disease. The physician orders included enhanced barrier precautions for high contact care activities every shift for wounds and PEG tube. The annual MDS indicated the resident had a severely impaired cognitive pattern and impaired functional abilities on one side of the upper extremities and both lower extremities. The care plan stated the resident required PEG feeding related to dysphagia following a cerebral infarction and received nothing by mouth.
Failure to Use Hoyer Lift During Transfer Results in Resident Fracture
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) transferred a resident from bed to wheelchair using a stand and pivot method instead of the Hoyer lift as specified in the resident's comprehensive care plan. The resident was care planned as totally dependent for transfers and required the use of a Hoyer lift with two-person assistance due to significant physical limitations, including generalized muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, and impaired range of motion in both upper extremities. The CNA did not utilize the Hoyer lift during the transfer, resulting in the resident hitting her right arm on the wheelchair armrest and experiencing acute pain. The resident's medical record indicated a history of cerebral infarction, rheumatoid arthritis, and generalized osteoarthritis, and she was admitted to hospice care. The care plan interventions specifically included the use of a Hoyer lift for all transfers, and this requirement was documented in the resident's chart and typically indicated by a sign over the resident's bed. On the day of the incident, the CNA was not aware of the resident's transfer requirements and did not check the care plan or observe a sign over the bed. The CNA later reported not knowing how to look up transfer abilities until after the incident. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the resident was dependent on staff for transfers and that the standard practice was to use a Hoyer lift, with signage over the bed to indicate this need. The incident resulted in the resident sustaining an acute complex impacted fracture of the right humeral neck, requiring emergency evaluation and treatment. The CNA involved had received facility orientation and had worked at the facility on several occasions prior to the incident, but failed to follow the care plan during the transfer.
Failure to Use Hoyer Lift for Dependent Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff failed to follow the care plan for a resident who was assessed as requiring a Hoyer lift for all transfers. The resident, who had diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, lumbar spondylopathy, vascular dementia, and anxiety, was documented as totally dependent on staff for transfers and at risk for falls. The care plan, therapy assessments, and facility policies all specified the use of a Hoyer lift with two-person assistance for transfers, and the resident was listed as a total lift on the facility's lift list. On the morning in question, the resident was observed in a wheelchair without a Hoyer lift pad, which is typically left in place after a mechanical lift transfer. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the resident had been transferred from bed to wheelchair without the use of a Hoyer lift. The agency CNA assigned to the resident admitted to using a stand and pivot transfer method instead of the required Hoyer lift, despite being trained on the facility's procedures and having access to the resident's care plan in the electronic system. The CNA stated that the resident was able to assist with the transfer and that a Hoyer lift pad was not available in the room at the time. Supervisory staff, including the CNA supervisor, RN supervisor, and Director of Rehabilitation, all confirmed that the resident was care planned for Hoyer lift transfers and that the correct procedure was not followed. The agency CNA's personnel record showed she had completed facility orientation and acknowledged her responsibility to follow the care plan and report any concerns to management. The failure to use the Hoyer lift as required by the care plan and facility policy constituted neglect, as it did not provide the necessary services to avoid potential physical harm or distress to the resident.
Medication Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of quality in medication administration for two residents. Resident #102, who was admitted with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, was observed with a medicine cup containing pills left on the bedside table. The resident confirmed that the nurse left the medications for her to take after eating, despite not having an order for self-administration. Interviews with the LPN and RN confirmed that medications should not have been left at the bedside without a self-administration order. Similarly, Resident #105, diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of the right kidney, was found with a medicine cup containing pills on the bedside table. The resident identified the pills as Oxycodone and Lexapro, which were left from the morning medication pass. The LPN confirmed leaving the medications at the bedside and acknowledged that the resident did not have an order for self-administration. The Corporate Nurse also confirmed that medications should not have been left at the bedside, and a nurse should remain until the medication administration is complete.
Failure to Provide Proper Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for two residents. For one resident, the facility did not change the humidification bottle and nasal cannula weekly as ordered. Observations revealed that the humidification bottle and nasal cannula were dated over two weeks prior, and the LPN confirmed that the setup should have been changed weekly but was not. For another resident, the facility did not ensure that oxygen tubing was dated and that humidification was administered with oxygen. Observations showed that the resident was using oxygen without a humidification bottle and that the cannula tubing was not dated. The LPN confirmed the absence of humidification and the lack of a date on the tubing, acknowledging that these were required.
Improper Thawing Practices in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in a safe and sanitary environment, which could prevent contamination and foodborne illness for the 121 residents served meal trays from the kitchen. Observations in the facility kitchen revealed improper thawing practices for meat. On two separate occasions, large tube-shaped chubs of ground beef and pork tenderloins were found submerged in standing water in the sink, rather than being thawed under running water as required by accepted practices. Staff members, including S7 and S8, confirmed the improper thawing method and acknowledged the meat should not be submerged in standing water. Additionally, S8 was unaware of how the sink was cleaned before the meat was placed in direct contact with it. The Dietary Manager, S6, confirmed the improper thawing practices and reported the number of residents served from the kitchen during the observed days.
Inaccurate Payroll Submission for Direct Care Staffing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required by CMS. A review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2024 revealed issues, including a One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. During an interview, the Regional President acknowledged that there was a PBJ system reporting error to CMS for the specified period.
Failure to Use Hoyer Lift Results in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from harm by not utilizing a Hoyer lift during a transfer, which was required as per the resident's care plan. The incident involved a resident with multiple medical conditions, including cerebral ischemia, polyosteoarthritis, and Alzheimer's disease, who was totally dependent on two staff members for transfers. On the day of the incident, the resident was transferred from a Geri chair to a bed without the use of a Hoyer lift, resulting in a severe injury to the resident's left leg. The incident occurred when a CNA, who was an agency staff member, wheeled the resident to their room and left them unattended, claiming to have gone to retrieve a Hoyer lift. However, video surveillance revealed that the CNA did not leave the room to get the lift but instead went directly to the nurse's station to report the resident's injury. The resident was found in bed with a significant laceration on the left leg, exposing adipose tissue and bone, which required surgical intervention. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident was known to require a Hoyer lift and two-person assistance for transfers. The CNA involved had been in-serviced on the proper use of lifts but failed to follow the care plan, leading to the resident's injury. The facility's video surveillance and staff statements highlighted discrepancies in the CNA's account of the events, indicating a failure to adhere to established protocols for safe resident handling.
Failure to Follow Transfer Protocols Results in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate assistance and supervision for a resident during a transfer, leading to a significant injury. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including cerebral ischemia, polyosteoarthritis, and Alzheimer's disease, was totally dependent on two staff members for transfers and required the use of a Hoyer lift as per their care plan. On the day of the incident, the resident was transferred from a Geri chair to a bed without the use of the Hoyer lift, resulting in a severe leg injury that exposed adipose tissue and bone. The incident occurred when a CNA, who had been in-serviced on the proper use of lifts, wheeled the resident to their room and left them unattended, claiming to have gone to retrieve the Hoyer lift. However, video surveillance revealed that the CNA did not leave the room to get the lift and instead went directly to the nurse's station to report the injury. The resident was found in bed with a significant laceration on their left leg, and the Geri chair was positioned perpendicular to the bed with the lift sling still in place, indicating that the proper transfer procedure was not followed. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident was known to require a Hoyer lift and two-person assistance for transfers. The CNA involved in the incident provided a statement that contradicted the video evidence, claiming to have left the room to get the lift. The failure to follow the resident's care plan and utilize the necessary equipment for safe transfers directly led to the resident's injury, which required surgical intervention and resulted in the resident being transferred to a hospital and subsequently discharged to another facility.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately supervise a severely cognitively impaired resident, leading to the resident's elopement. The resident, who had a history of elopement from home, was inaccurately assessed as not at risk for elopement upon admission. This assessment was conducted by the Assistant Director of Nursing, who did not interview the resident's family or responsible party, despite their presence during the evaluation. Consequently, the resident's care plan did not include necessary interventions to prevent elopement. On the day of the incident, the resident was able to exit the facility through the front entrance, which was not locked during the day. The evening receptionist, unaware that the individual was a resident, remotely opened the sliding doors, allowing the resident to leave. The staff did not realize the resident was missing until approximately 90 minutes later, at which point a search was initiated, and the local police and the resident's responsible party were notified. The resident was eventually found unharmed at a local restaurant, having crossed two four-lane roads. Interviews and video reviews revealed that the facility's front entrance was not secure, and there were times when the front desk was unattended. The receptionist on duty was not informed of the new admission or the resident's risk for elopement. Additionally, the facility lacked a lockdown unit or wander guard system to prevent such incidents. These oversights and failures in communication and security measures contributed to the resident's unsupervised departure from the facility.
Elopement of Cognitively Impaired Resident Due to Inadequate Risk Assessment and Security Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer its resources effectively and efficiently, resulting in a deficiency related to the elopement of a cognitively impaired resident. The resident, who was ambulatory and severely cognitively impaired, managed to exit the facility unsupervised. This occurred when the evening receptionist remotely opened the front sliding doors, allowing the resident to leave. The staff did not realize the resident had eloped until approximately 90 minutes later, prompting a search and notification of local police and the resident's responsible party. The resident was eventually found unharmed at a local restaurant about a mile away, having crossed two four-lane roads. The deficiency was further compounded by the failure of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to accurately assess the resident's risk for elopement upon admission. The ADON did not interview the resident's family or responsible party to capture a history of elopement from home, nor did they note the resident's expressed desire to leave the facility. Additionally, the facility lacked a secure front entrance and did not have a lockdown unit or wander guard system in place to prevent such incidents. The front entrance was left unlocked during the day, and the reception desk was sometimes unmanned, allowing for potential elopement risks.
Failure to Assess Elopement Risk Leads to Resident Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff possessed the necessary competencies to accurately assess a resident for elopement risk. This deficiency was identified when a severely cognitively impaired resident, who was ambulatory, eloped from the facility. The resident was able to exit the facility through the front entrance after the evening receptionist remotely released the doors, unaware that the resident was at risk for elopement. The staff did not realize the resident had eloped until approximately 7:30 p.m., indicating a significant lapse in supervision and risk assessment. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) inaccurately assessed the resident as not at risk for elopement upon admission. The ADON failed to interview the resident's family or responsible party, missing critical information about the resident's history of elopement from home and expressed desire to leave the facility. This oversight resulted in the absence of protective measures for the resident, who had a documented history of wandering behaviors and severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the initial elopement risk evaluation was inaccurate and that the ADON should have conducted a more thorough assessment. The ADON later acknowledged changing answers on the initial evaluation after the resident's elopement, which should not have been done. The receptionist was not informed of the resident's risk status, contributing to the failure in safety processes. The personnel record of the ADON did not reveal completed nursing assessment competencies, highlighting a gap in staff training and competency verification.
Failure to Document and Investigate Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure grievances and complaints were documented and investigated according to their policy. Specifically, the facility did not follow their grievance policy for a resident who had multiple medical conditions, including hemiplegia, aphasia, and vascular dementia. The resident's family member reported to the administrator that the resident was repeatedly found in a soiled brief during visits. Despite this complaint, the administrator did not document the grievance or initiate an investigation as required by the facility's policy. The facility's grievance policy mandates that any grievances or complaints, whether oral or written, should be documented and investigated promptly. However, the administrator admitted that issues resolved quickly were not included in the grievance log. This led to the failure to document and investigate the family member's complaint about the resident's soiled brief, which was a clear violation of the facility's established grievance procedures.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 112 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bossier City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Manor Health & Rehab | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Adira Medical Resort | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Northwest Louisiana Veterans Home | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Highland Place Rehab And Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.