Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilit during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Incomplete Advance Directive Documentation: The facility failed to document whether advance directives had been executed for 3 residents reviewed. Each resident’s advance medical directives form was left incomplete with no box checked, and the ADM verified the forms were not completed. The affected residents had significant medical histories including fractures, DM2, COPD, CHF, neuropathy, HTN, aphasia, and hemiplegia, with BIMS scores of 13 and 12 for two of the residents.
A facility failed to complete Safe Smoking Assessments on admission and with each subsequent MDS assessment for a resident identified as a smoker. The resident had diagnoses including COPD, epilepsy, generalized muscle weakness, and conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, was listed as a safe smoker, and was identified in the Baseline Care Plan as a smoker; however, the record did not show the required assessments, and the DON confirmed they were not completed.
Failure to complete significant change assessment after hospice admission. A resident with CVA-related hemiplegia, aphasia, dysphagia, CHF, CKD, and severe cognitive impairment was admitted to hospice, but the care plan did not reflect hospice care or significant change, and the DON and MDS nurse confirmed no significant change assessment was completed after the hospice admit.
Inconsistent code status documentation for two residents was identified when POST forms, face sheets, physician orders, and care plans did not match the residents' stated wishes. One resident with multiple chronic conditions and intact cognition had a signed POST for DNR/Allow Natural Death, but the EMR and care plan showed Full Code with CPR instructions. Another resident with COPD, DM2, CHF, epilepsy, PVD, and depression had conflicting POST documents and other records that alternated between DNR and Full Code, despite the resident stating a wish not to be resuscitated.
A facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for a resident with multiple medical conditions, inaccurately documenting the resident's self-care abilities in the annual MDS. Staff interviews and an Occupational Therapy Evaluation revealed the resident required significant assistance with all ADLs, contradicting the MDS assessment. The DON acknowledged the inaccuracy.
Incomplete Advance Directive Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation regarding the existence of written advance directives for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility’s policy stated that upon admission residents are to be provided written information about the right to refuse or accept treatment and to formulate an advance directive, and that the Social Services Director or designee is to inquire about the existence of any written advance directives prior to or upon admission. It also stated that if a resident had not established advance directives, staff would offer assistance in establishing them. Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur with routine healing, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and COPD. Resident #25 was admitted with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, neuropathy, chronic systolic CHF, obstructive sleep apnea, anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, and hypertension, and had a BIMS score of 13. Resident #69 was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, aphasia following cerebral infarction, COPD, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and systolic CHF, and had a BIMS score of 12. For each of these residents, the advanced medical directives form was incomplete because the section asking whether an advance directive had been executed had no box checked. During interview, the ADM verified that each resident’s advance directive was not completed and should be.
Missing Safe Smoking Assessments for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Safe Smoking Assessments were completed on admission and with each subsequent MDS assessment for one resident reviewed for smoking. The facility’s Smoking Policy stated that residents are to be evaluated on admission to determine whether they are smokers or non-smokers, and if a resident is a smoker, the evaluation must include the ability to smoke safely with or without supervision using a completed Safe Smoking Evaluation or equivalent form. The policy also stated that once a resident is determined to be a smoker, the resident’s ability to smoke safely is to be evaluated upon admission, subsequent MDS assessments, and PRN. Resident #26 was admitted with diagnoses including conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, COPD, epilepsy, and generalized muscle weakness. The resident was listed on the facility’s Safe Smoking List as a safe smoker, and the Baseline Care Plan identified the resident as a smoker. However, review of the resident’s record did not reveal a Safe Smoking Assessment completed on admission, and further review did not reveal Safe Smoking Assessments completed with each subsequent MDS assessment. During interview, the DON reviewed the Smoking Policy and the resident’s record and confirmed the assessments should have been completed on admission and with each subsequent MDS assessment and were not.
Failure to Complete Significant Change Assessment After Hospice Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed for one resident after the resident was admitted to hospice. Resident #15 was admitted on 06/13/2022 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, aphasia and dysphagia following cerebral infarction, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease stage two, peripheral vascular disease with heart failure, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, unspecified systolic congestive heart failure, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. The resident’s MDS showed the resident was rarely or never understood, had short- and long-term memory problems, and had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Physician orders for June 2026 included admission to hospice under routine home care with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction, dated 04/16/2026. Review of the care plan failed to reveal a care plan related to hospice care or significant change. During interviews, the DON confirmed the resident was admitted to hospice on 04/16/2026 and that a significant change assessment was not completed, and the MDS nurse confirmed she did not complete a significant change assessment after the hospice admission.
Inconsistent Code Status Documentation for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' code status wishes for emergency basic life support were consistent and accurate across all areas of the medical record for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility's Advance Directives policy stated that each resident's plan of care would be consistent with documented treatment preferences and advance directives, that residents had the right to refuse treatment, and that the DON or designee would notify the attending physician so appropriate orders could be documented in the medical record and plan of care. For Resident #4, the record showed an admit diagnosis history including a right femur fracture, diabetes, COPD, depression, PTSD, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, anxiety, and insulin use. The resident had a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognitive intactness. The resident signed a POST indicating DNR/Allow Natural Death, comfort-focused treatment, and no artificial nutrition by tube, and the physician also signed it. However, the electronic medical record home page, face sheet, physician orders, and care plan all showed Full Code, with the care plan directing staff to begin CPR and call 911. During interview, the resident stated they had signed a yellow paper indicating DNR and did not want CPR. For Resident #78, the record showed diagnoses including COPD, type 2 diabetes, epilepsy, peripheral vascular disease, CHF, and major depressive disorder. The resident had not yet completed an admission MDS/BIMS. The electronic record contained a POST electronically signed by the resident indicating DNR/Allow Natural Death, comfort-focused treatment, and no artificial nutrition by tube, and the resident's advance directive acknowledgment also indicated a DNR order. However, the hard copy POST signed by the resident and physician indicated CPR/Attempt Resuscitation with comfort-focused treatment and no artificial nutrition by tube. The electronic medical record home page, face sheet, physician orders, and care plan all showed Full Code. During interview, the resident stated they had told staff they did not want resuscitation and wanted to die naturally, and the Administrator and DON confirmed the documents did not match and were not consistent across the record.
Inaccurate Resident Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that assessments were accurate for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including cerebral infarction, diabetes, and dementia. The resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2024 inaccurately reflected the resident's self-care abilities, indicating independence in various activities of daily living (ADLs) such as eating, oral hygiene, toileting, showering, and dressing. However, an Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment for the period 05/10/2024 - 06/08/2024 revealed that the resident required partial to maximal assistance with these activities, contradicting the MDS assessment. Interviews with facility staff, including a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed that the resident required significant assistance with all ADLs. The CNA reported that the resident could feed himself but needed help with all other self-care tasks, while the LPN noted that the resident had become weaker and more confused, necessitating total assistance. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the annual MDS assessment was inaccurate and did not accurately reflect the resident's abilities, confirming the deficiency in the facility's assessment process.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 143 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Shreveport
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring Lake Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Pierremont Healthcare Center | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, Llc | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Village Health Care At The Glen | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Magnolia Manor Nursing And Rehab Ctr, Llc | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing And Rehabilit.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.