Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Arbor Lake Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to document and follow up on resident council grievances. Residents reported that concerns raised in council meetings, including a missing wheelchair, were not addressed or revisited, and the grievance log showed only one grievance over the review period. The SSD stated she had not seen the council minutes, while the administrator could not provide written documentation of follow-up on the issues raised.
A facility failed to prevent unnecessary psychotropic use for several residents with cognitive impairment and psychiatric or neurologic diagnoses. PRN lorazepam orders were not limited to 14 days for two residents, and consultant pharmacist recommendations for GDRs and order clarification for other psychotropic medications were not addressed by the physician. Residents continued receiving lorazepam, antidepressants, anxiolytics, sedatives, and antipsychotics as ordered.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, incontinence, a feeding tube, and existing pressure injuries had an inaccurate pressure ulcer assessment, no documented weekly body audits, and missing TAR documentation for multiple ordered wound treatments. The WCN, ADON, and DON confirmed the missing documentation and that weekly body audits should have been completed and recorded.
Failure to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs occurred when ordered TSH and Iron labs were not obtained for a resident receiving Levothyroxine and Ferrous Sulfate. The resident had hypothyroidism, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder, with severe cognitive impairment and substantial to maximal ADL dependence. The MAR showed both medications were administered, but the record had no evidence the required lab monitoring was completed, and the ADON and DON confirmed the labs were not obtained as ordered.
Infection Control Failures in Whirlpool Disinfection, Urine Collection Storage, and Medication Handling: The facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices when whirlpools were not disinfected per the manufacturer’s instructions, a resident’s non-invasive urine collection tubing was stored uncovered near food items, and an LPN picked up dropped pills with an ungloved hand and administered them to a resident. Staff interviews and observations showed the whirlpool disinfectant system was not properly maintained, the urine tubing was not stored in a bag, and the medication was handled after being dropped on the cart.
Kitchen equipment was not maintained in safe operating condition when a PVC pipe under the 3-compartment sink was observed leaking water and the water was being collected in a tin can for disposal. The deep fryer was also observed with grease buildup in the internal compartment, and the Dietary Manager confirmed both the pipe and fryer needed attention.
A resident with Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, and GERD required substantial to maximal assistance with eating. During meal service, a CNA was observed standing over the resident while assisting with the meal, and the CNA confirmed this occurred. The ADON and DON confirmed staff should not stand over residents while providing meal assistance, and facility policies stated residents must be treated with dignity and staff should not stand over residents while assisting with meals.
Care Plan Missing Urinary Collection System Details: A resident with a hx of UTIs, overactive bladder, and moderate cognitive impairment had a urinary collection system that was not identified in the care plan. Surveyors observed the tubing uncovered and clipped to a storage bin drawer near the resident’s snacks, and the ADON and DON confirmed the care plan did not include the system or approaches for storing and caring for the supplies.
The facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints used for convenience, lacking consents and physician orders for lap trays as restraints. Three residents with severe cognitive impairments were observed using gerichairs with lap trays without proper documentation or monitoring for release every two hours.
The facility failed to obtain informed consent for side rail use for two residents. One resident, who is cognitively aware, was observed with bilateral quarter side rails without documented consent or information on risks and benefits. Another resident with Alzheimer's disease was observed with a right quarter side rail, also lacking documented consent and risk-benefit information. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility failed to ensure proper documentation of medication administration for several residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Residents with severe cognitive impairments and various medical conditions had multiple instances of undocumented medication administration over two months. This issue was confirmed by the facility's nursing leadership, indicating a systemic problem with medication administration documentation.
A pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in medication administration documentation for several residents, including those with severe cognitive impairments and various medical conditions. The oversight involved missing entries in the September 2024 MAR, which were not addressed in the pharmacist's October report. This deficiency was confirmed by the DON and ADON through interviews.
A resident with multiple health conditions was found self-administering unauthorized medications, including Fluticasone nasal spray and an Albuterol inhaler, without proper assessment or documentation. The facility's policy requires evaluation of residents' abilities to self-administer medications and secure storage of such medications, which was not adhered to in this case. An LPN confirmed the resident should not have had these medications at the bedside, indicating a deficiency in medication management.
A facility failed to document the reason for a resident's hospital transfer, violating discharge procedures. The resident had multiple medical conditions, but there was no record in the nurses' notes explaining the transfer. Staff confirmed the lack of documentation and that the family was only notified by phone.
A facility failed to provide a resident-centered activity program for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, despite their expressed preferences and care plan. The resident, with multiple health diagnoses, was observed sitting without engaging in activities, and staff interactions were minimal. Interviews revealed a lack of documentation and facilitation of activities, leading to the deficiency.
A facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple psychiatric and neurological conditions, who was investigated for smoking. Despite a care plan identifying the resident as at risk for injury related to smoking, the resident was left unsupervised in the smoking area, and staff inaccurately assessed the resident as a safe smoker. The facility's smoking policy requires supervision in designated areas, but observations showed the resident was not properly monitored, leading to a deficiency in ensuring safety.
A facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by not providing an acceptable diagnosis for Seroquel. Despite recommendations from a Pharmaceutical Consultant, the physician did not address the need for an appropriate diagnosis, which was confirmed by the DON.
Failure to Document and Follow Up on Resident Council Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to act promptly on grievances voiced by residents during monthly Resident Council meetings and failed to document the facility’s response to those concerns. The facility’s Resident Council policy stated that all resident concerns would be addressed and revisited at the following month’s meeting, and the grievance policy stated that grievances could be submitted orally or in writing, that the social services director was responsible for grievance investigation, and that the resident or complainant would be informed of the findings and corrective actions. However, review of Resident Council minutes for the stated period showed a section for old business and follow-up, but there was no documented response or follow-up to issues concerning care and life at the facility. During the Resident Council meeting on 02/28/2025, Resident #60 reported a missing wheelchair, but there was no written response or follow-up documented. Review of the monthly grievance logs showed only one grievance for the 11-month period reviewed. At the 09/29/2025 Resident Council meeting, residents reported they were not receiving follow-up on issues and complaints raised in council. Resident #60 stated she had previously made a verbal report that her personal wheelchair was missing during a Resident Council meeting, and Resident #25 reported not receiving feedback or follow-up for verbal complaints. The social services director stated she was the grievance official and had never seen the Resident Council minutes during her tenure, while the administrative assistant confirmed the issues in the minutes should have been followed up. The administrator stated he received the minutes after each meeting and followed up on them, but could not provide written documentation of follow-up for individual or group issues.
Unaddressed psychotropic medication orders and dose reduction recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents receiving psychotropic medications were not subjected to chemical restraints for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficiency involved failure to limit PRN psychotropic orders to 14 days for residents receiving lorazepam, failure to attempt gradual dose reductions for residents receiving psychotropic medications, and failure to have physician responses documented for consultant pharmacist recommendations. The residents involved had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, depression, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, dysphagia, and chronic medical conditions, and several had severe or moderate cognitive impairment based on BIMS scores. Resident #11 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including dementia with behaviors/agitation, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The resident had a PRN lorazepam order for 0.5 mg every 6 hours and received the medication during the month reviewed. The consultant pharmacist noted that PRN psychotropic medications are limited to an initial 14 days and require prescriber evaluation before extension, but there was no documentation that the physician addressed this recommendation. Resident #2 also had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses including anxiety, depression, dementia, and chronic pain. The resident had a PRN lorazepam oral concentrate order for agitation and received the medication as ordered, but the consultant pharmacist recommendation regarding the 14-day limit and prescriber evaluation was not addressed. Resident #25 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses including major depressive disorder, hypertension, venous thrombosis history, and congestive heart failure; the consultant pharmacist recommended gradual dose reductions for Zoloft and doxepin, but the physician did not address the recommendations. Resident #37 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, nicotine dependence, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dysphagia, and depressive episodes; the consultant pharmacist requested dose reductions for buspirone, diazepam, and duloxetine, and requested a specific duration and stop date for Ambien and a CMS-approved diagnosis for Seroquel, but these recommendations were not addressed and the resident continued to receive the medications as ordered.
Missing wound treatment documentation and inaccurate pressure ulcer assessment
Penalty
Summary
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses including somatoform disorder, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, major depression, transient ischemic attack, and a pressure ulcer on the back. The quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making, and the resident was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. The record also showed the resident had one or more unhealed pressure injuries, was at risk for pressure ulcers, was total bowel and bladder incontinent, and had a feeding tube. The care plan included interventions for impaired skin integrity, including medications for wound healing, barrier cream as needed, a low air loss mattress, heel protectors, and turning/repositioning every 2 hours. The facility failed to document weekly body audits for the resident, and the pressure ulcer assessment was found to be inaccurate. The September 2025 TAR also lacked documented evidence that ordered wound treatments were completed on multiple dates for the left ankle wound, the left back wound, and the back wound. The physician orders included wound cleansing, collagen, alginate, foam dressing, betadine, silicone dressing, Santyl, Hydrofera Blue Foam, absorbent pad, abdominal pad, and tape, but the TAR did not show these treatments on the dates identified in the record. The WCN, ADON, and DON each confirmed the missing documentation and that weekly body audits should have been performed and documented.
Failure to Obtain Ordered TSH and Iron Labs for Resident on Levothyroxine and Iron
Penalty
Summary
Ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs was not met when the facility failed to obtain ordered laboratory tests for Resident #11. Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and the resident required substantial to maximal assistance for most ADLs. Resident #11 had physician orders for Levothyroxine Sodium 125 mcg daily and Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg daily, along with an order to obtain TSH and Iron laboratory levels every 6 months. The September 2025 MAR showed the resident received both medications throughout the month, but the medical record contained no documented evidence that the ordered TSH and Iron levels were obtained. An interview with the ADON confirmed the labs were not obtained as ordered, and the DON also confirmed the facility had not obtained the TSH and Iron levels for Resident #11.
Infection Control Failures in Whirlpool Disinfection, Urine Collection Storage, and Medication Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. One part of the deficiency involved whirlpool A and whirlpool B, which were not disinfected according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use. The facility’s undated Whirlpool/Shower Cleaning and Disinfecting policy stated whirlpools and showers were to be cleaned and disinfected between each use, with all surface areas and each individual jet treated with disinfectant and left wet for 10 minutes before rinsing. During interviews, CNAs described cleaning the whirlpools with tile and grout cleaner, rinsing them, and then using a disinfectant button for only brief periods, while one CNA reported there had been no disinfectant in the whirlpool since May 2025. A maintenance staff member stated neither housekeeping nor maintenance replaced the disinfectant solution, and housekeeping reported it had never been instructed to clean and disinfect the whirlpool. On observation, the hose labeled disinfectant was not connected to a supply bottle, and the administrator could not confirm that the posted instructions were the manufacturer’s instructions. The manufacturer’s instructions reviewed by surveyors directed that after each bath the whirlpool be cleaned and disinfected by running disinfectant through the air jets, scrubbing all interior surfaces, allowing the disinfectant to remain for 10 minutes, rinsing thoroughly, and running the air blower to clear the air injection system. The facility also failed to implement standard precautions for proper storage of a non-invasive urine collection system and for medication administration. Resident #90 had diagnoses including a history of urinary tract infections and overactive bladder, and an MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Surveyors observed the resident’s urine collection system tubing uncovered and clipped to the upper drawer of a plastic storage bin, with snacks stored in the same area near the tubing. Staff members confirmed the tubing should be stored in a bag and not near food items. In a separate event, an LPN dropped two pills, Neurontin 600 mg and Zyrtec 10 mg, onto the medication cart, picked them up with an ungloved hand, returned them to the medication cup, and administered them to Resident #4; the DON confirmed the pills should not have been picked up and given to the resident.
Kitchen Equipment Not Maintained in Safe Operating Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure mechanical equipment was maintained in safe operating condition in the kitchen. During observation, a PVC pipe under the 3-compartment sink was leaking water, and the water was being collected in a large tin can that dietary workers emptied into the sink when full. The deep fryer was also observed to have a buildup of grease on the internal compartment. The Dietary Manager confirmed the PVC pipe needed repair and the deep fryer needed to be cleaned. The issue was brought to the Administrator's attention after the observations and interview.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Meal Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect during meal assistance. Resident #77 was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and the Quarterly MDS indicated the resident required substantial to maximal assistance while eating. During an observation in the dining room, the resident was seated in a geri chair with a lap tray while a CNA stood up and assisted with the meal. The CNA confirmed she was standing over the resident while providing meal assistance, and the ADON and DON later confirmed that staff should not stand over residents while assisting them with meals. The facility policy on Assistance with Meals stated staff should not stand over residents while assisting with meals, and the Quality of Life-Dignity policy stated residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times.
Care Plan Missing Urinary Collection System Details
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #90 related to her urinary collection system. The resident’s medical record showed diagnoses including personal history of urinary tract infections and overactive bladder, and the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the current care plan showed that the urinary collection system and the proper storage of supplies were not identified in the resident’s plan of care. During observations on 09/29/2025 and 10/01/2025, Resident #90 was seen in her recliner in her room with the urine collection system tubing uncovered and clipped to the upper drawer of her plastic storage bin. The resident’s snacks, including chocolate candy and cheese nips, were stored in the top drawer near the uncovered tubing. On 10/01/2025, the ADON confirmed that the urinary collection system was not identified on the care plan and that there were no approaches for storing and caring for the supplies. The DON later confirmed that the urinary collection system should have been identified on the resident’s current care plan.
Failure to Obtain Consents and Monitor Restraint Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from the use of physical restraints imposed for discipline or convenience. Specifically, the facility did not obtain restraint consents that included the risks and benefits of restraint use for three residents. Additionally, there were no physician orders for the use of lap trays as restraints for two of these residents, and there was a lack of monitoring for the release of the lap trays for all three residents. Resident #42 was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including major depressive disorder and dementia. The resident's care plan included the use of a gerichair with a lap tray to promote mobility and socialization. However, there was no documented pre-restraining assessment prior to the implementation of the gerichair with a lap tray, and the consent form did not specify the restraint or identify the associated risks and benefits. Furthermore, there was no evidence of monitoring for the release of the lap tray every two hours as required. Similarly, residents #64 and #92 were observed using gerichairs with lap trays without physician orders or documented consents. Both residents had severe cognitive impairments and required assistance with daily activities. The facility failed to document the monitoring of the lap trays' release every two hours, and there was no evidence that the residents or their responsible parties were informed of the potential risks and benefits of using the lap trays as restraints.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Side Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained for the use of side rails for two residents, as required by their policy. Resident #22, who is cognitively aware and able to make daily decisions, was observed with bilateral quarter side rails raised on multiple occasions. However, the facility did not document the assistive device in the resident's consent form, nor did they inform the resident or their representative about the potential benefits and risks associated with the side rail use. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the absence of consent for the use of side rails for this resident. Similarly, Resident #18, who has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, was observed with a right quarter side rail raised. The facility also failed to document this assistive device in the resident's consent form and did not inform the resident or their representative about the potential benefits and risks of side rail use. An interview with another ADON confirmed that the consent form did not identify the use of the right quarter side rail and that the potential risks and benefits were not included in the consent.
Inadequate Medication Administration Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff demonstrated the necessary competencies and skills to care for residents' needs, as evidenced by inadequate documentation of medication administration for six residents. The report highlights that there was no documentation of medication administration for various medications prescribed to these residents over September and October 2024. This lack of documentation was confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) during interviews. Resident #68, who has severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and congestive heart failure, had numerous instances of undocumented medication administration. The September and October 2024 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed missing documentation for several medications, including Atorvastatin, Lasix, and Zoloft, among others. Additionally, required assessments such as pain and behavior/mood monitoring were not consistently documented. Similarly, other residents, including those with moderate cognitive impairment and various medical conditions, also experienced lapses in documentation. For instance, Resident #17's MARs showed missing documentation for Macrobid administration, while Resident #83's records lacked documentation for Eliquis administration and bleeding precautions monitoring. These deficiencies were acknowledged by the facility's nursing leadership, indicating a systemic issue with medication administration documentation across the facility.
Pharmacist Fails to Report Medication Documentation Irregularities
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves a failure by the pharmacist to identify and report irregularities in medication administration documentation for several residents. The pharmacist did not notify the attending physician, the facility's medical director, or the director of nursing about these irregularities, which included incomplete documentation of medication administration for multiple residents. This oversight was identified during a review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) and confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON). Resident #68, who has severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including diabetes and dementia, had numerous instances of undocumented medication administration in September 2024. The pharmacist's October 2024 report failed to address these missing entries. Similarly, Resident #17, with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of urinary tract infections, had missing documentation for the administration of Macrobid, an antibiotic, which was not identified by the pharmacist. Other residents, including those with severe cognitive impairments and various medical conditions, also had significant gaps in their medication administration records. For instance, Resident #50 had multiple medications not documented as administered, and Resident #59 had several instances of undocumented medication administration. The pharmacist's failure to report these irregularities was confirmed through interviews with the DON and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), highlighting a systemic issue in the medication review process.
Failure to Assess Resident for Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications, as required by their policy. The policy mandates that staff and practitioners evaluate each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine if self-administration is clinically appropriate. Additionally, the policy requires that self-administered medications be stored securely and that unauthorized medications found at the bedside be reported to the Charge Nurse. However, the facility did not follow these procedures for a resident diagnosed with multiple conditions, including ALS, depression, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease sequelae, and anxiety disorder. The resident was found to have unauthorized medications, specifically Fluticasone nasal spray and an Albuterol inhaler, at their bedside, which they were self-administering without proper assessment or documentation. These medications were not included in the resident's physician orders, indicating a lack of oversight and adherence to the facility's medication management policy. An LPN later confirmed that the resident should not have had these medications at the bedside and should not have been self-administering them, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's medication administration and monitoring processes.
Failure to Document Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document the necessity for transferring a resident to the hospital, which is a requirement for proper discharge and transfer procedures. Specifically, there was no documentation in the medical record for a resident who was transferred to the hospital. The facility's policy requires that any changes in a resident's medical or mental condition be recorded in their medical record, but this was not adhered to in the case of the resident in question. The resident had a complex medical history, including conditions such as cerebral infarction, hypertension, and dementia, among others. Despite this, there was no documentation in the nurses' notes explaining why the resident was discharged to the hospital. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN and the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed the lack of documentation and that the only communication with the family was a phone call, with no written record of the notification.
Failure to Provide Resident-Centered Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities tailored to the comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences of a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident, who has diagnoses including hypertensive chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes, expressed a preference for participating in any scheduled activities and indicated happiness when able to attend church. Despite these preferences, observations revealed that the resident spent significant time sitting at a table with staff but without engaging in any activities. Staff interactions were minimal, and the resident was not encouraged or assisted to participate in scheduled activities such as bingo or Bible study. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of documentation regarding specific activities provided to the resident, and the activity notes suggested a goal to offer in-room or daily activities to reduce loneliness or boredom. However, the resident expressed a desire to attend Bible study, which was not facilitated. The lack of engagement and failure to adhere to the resident's care plan and preferences resulted in the deficiency noted by surveyors.
Inadequate Supervision of Resident Smoking
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and safety for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple psychiatric and neurological diagnoses, who was investigated for smoking. The facility's smoking policy mandates a smoke-free environment and requires supervision in designated smoking areas. However, observations revealed that the resident was left unsupervised in the smoking area on multiple occasions, with staff from various departments lighting cigarettes for the resident without proper monitoring. The resident was known to dig in ashtrays and pick up cigarette butts, indicating a risk for unsafe smoking behavior. The resident's care plan identified a risk for injury related to smoking, with interventions including counseling on smoking hazards and designated areas, as well as observation during smoking. Despite these interventions, the resident was inaccurately assessed as a safe smoker, and the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident should have been deemed an unsafe smoker and required monitoring while smoking. The lack of accurate assessment and supervision led to the deficiency in ensuring the resident's safety.
Failure to Document Appropriate Diagnosis for Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility did not provide an acceptable diagnosis for the use of Seroquel for a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral, psychotic, or mood disturbances, anxiety, depression, and other conditions. The resident's October 2024 Physician's Orders included Seroquel with an associated diagnosis of unspecified dementia and anxiety, but lacked a documented acceptable diagnosis for the psychotropic medication. The Pharmaceutical Consultant Report dated 10/10/2024 recommended providing an appropriate diagnosis for the use of Seroquel. However, the physician only addressed the request for a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) on 10/30/2024 and did not address the need for an appropriate diagnosis. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged the failure to document an acceptable diagnosis for the use of Seroquel.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 40 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Farmerville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmerville Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Bernice Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 15.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Ruston Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 19.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Ridgecrest Community Care Center | 21.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Landmark Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr Of West Mon | 21.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Arbor Lake Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.