Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Oakview Nursing & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident who underwent ankle surgery did not have a comprehensive care plan implemented in a timely manner, leading to complications such as infection and sepsis. The facility failed to document and follow physician orders for wound care, resulting in the resident's hospitalization. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of clarity in responsibility for care plan implementation.
A resident admitted after ankle surgery did not receive prescribed wound care, leading to infection and hospitalization. Family members reported the facility's failure to change dressings, and staff interviews revealed a lack of communication and documentation. The resident developed cellulitis and sepsis, requiring hospital treatment.
The facility failed to adhere to food storage standards, as surveyors found unlabeled and expired drink containers in the walk-in cooler. A dietary worker and the Dietary Manager acknowledged the oversight, and the Administrator stated that the contracted dietary department was responsible for ensuring food was properly labeled and dated.
The facility was found deficient in maintaining an effective pest control program, with rodent and bird droppings observed in the emergency food storage room. The storage area, located in a detached building, was not kept clean and free of pests. The facility lacked a specific pest control policy, relying on general guidance, and staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and expectations for proper maintenance.
The facility failed to implement an effective infection control program, as clean supplies were improperly stored with biohazard waste in a storage building. During a wound care observation, it was found that clean examination gloves, COVID testing supplies, and trash bags were stored alongside biohazard containers. Interviews with the DON and Administrator confirmed this practice violated facility policy, which aims to prevent and control infections.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Post-Op Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, identified as R66, who was post-operative from a surgical procedure. The resident underwent surgery on the left ankle on 04/26/2024, but the facility did not create a care plan to monitor the surgical incisions until 05/07/2024. This delay in care planning led to the resident experiencing complications, including diffuse redness, swelling, and purulent drainage from the surgical site, which required emergency medical attention and hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy. The resident, R66, was admitted to the facility on 04/22/2024 and had a history of a transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. After the surgical procedure on 04/26/2024, the resident returned to the facility with new orders to cleanse the surgical incisions and change the dressing daily. However, these orders were not documented in the resident's medical record until after the resident was discharged to the hospital on 05/15/2024. The lack of a timely care plan and failure to document and implement physician orders contributed to the resident's condition worsening, resulting in a diagnosis of cellulitis and sepsis. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator, ADON, and DON, revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility in implementing the care plan for R66. The ADON, who was responsible for wound care, admitted to assessing the wounds but was unsure if documentation was completed. The MDS Coordinator and DON acknowledged that a comprehensive care plan should have been in place upon the resident's return from surgery. The failure to implement a care plan and follow professional standards of practice was identified as a deficiency, posing a risk of serious harm to the resident.
Failure to Implement Physician Orders Leads to Resident Infection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care and treatment for a resident who was admitted following an ankle fracture surgery. The resident underwent an open reduction internal fixation trimalleolar procedure to repair the left ankle and returned to the facility with specific physician orders for wound care, including the application of Medi-Honey and daily dressing changes. However, the facility did not implement these orders, and there was no documented evidence of a comprehensive care plan for the resident's skin integrity or incisional care until several days after the surgery. The resident's family members reported that the facility staff did not change the resident's bandages for seven to eight days, despite having provided the orders to the front desk. The family observed signs of infection, including saturated dressings with odor and drainage, and took photographs to send to the podiatric surgeon. The surgeon, upon reviewing the photographs, requested to see the resident immediately and subsequently transferred the resident to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with cellulitis and sepsis, requiring intravenous antibiotics. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the resident's care. The Assistant Director of Nursing, who was also the wound care nurse, admitted to not documenting wound assessments and failing to implement a care plan. Other nurses reported not receiving or following up on the physician's orders, relying instead on verbal reports from previous shifts. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of a care plan and the failure to obtain and follow physician orders, which contributed to the resident's condition worsening.
Failure to Properly Label and Date Food Containers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, as observed during a survey. During an initial kitchen tour, surveyors found five drink containers in the walk-in cooler that were not labeled, dated, or had expired. Specifically, two containers of a dark liquid were labeled with a created date and discard date, while three other containers of a dark liquid were not labeled or dated at all. This oversight had the potential to affect all 76 residents in the facility. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's food storage policy. A dietary worker acknowledged that containers should always be labeled and dated, and stated that the containers in question should have been discarded. The Dietary Manager confirmed that all food should be labeled and dated, and should not be used past the discard date. The Administrator noted that the dietary department, which was contracted, was responsible for controlling the food brought into the facility, and he expected all food to be dated, labeled, and covered, with use-by dates clearly marked.
Deficiency in Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by the presence of rodent and bird droppings in the emergency food storage supply room. During an initial tour, surveyors observed white droppings on the floor, identified as bird droppings, and rodent droppings on food boxes stored on shelves. The storage area, located in a detached building occupied by the maintenance department, was not kept clean and free of pests. The facility did not have a specific pest control policy, relying instead on general guidance from the State Operations Manual. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and Administrator revealed a lack of awareness and expectation for the storage room to be maintained appropriately, highlighting the deficiency in pest control measures.
Improper Storage of Clean Supplies with Biohazard Waste
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the improper storage of clean supplies with biohazard waste. During an observation of wound care for a resident, it was noted that the nurse and charge nurse accessed a small storage building labeled as the Biohazard room. Inside, biohazard containers holding waste were stored alongside clean examination gloves, COVID testing supplies, and clean trash bags. This practice was contrary to the facility's infection control policy, which aims to prevent, detect, investigate, and control infections while maintaining a safe and sanitary environment. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Regional DON confirmed that clean supplies and biohazard materials should not be stored together, as everything in the Biohazard room would be considered contaminated. The facility's Administrator also stated that he expected staff to adhere to the facility's policies regarding biohazard materials, emphasizing that biohazard materials should not be stored in the same area as clean supplies. This deficiency highlights a significant lapse in the facility's infection control practices, as outlined in their policy effective January 2024.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 124 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Calvert City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calvert City Convalescent Center | 6.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Parkview Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 10.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| River Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Stonecreek Health And Rehabilitation | 11.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Lake Way Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 13.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Oakview Nursing & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.