Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Stonecreek Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Inaccurate Admission MDS Coding for Wounds: A resident admitted with atrial fibrillation, chronic fatigue, and adult failure to thrive had an admission Observation assessment documenting no wounds, yet the admission MDS coded a stage 2 pressure ulcer and an unstageable deep tissue injury as present on admission. The MDS Nurse stated there was no documentation in the hospital discharge information or admission assessment to support wounds on admission, and the DON and Administrator stated the MDS should have been verified for accuracy using the admission assessment and discharge summary.
Incomplete Care Plan for Resident With Multiple Pressure Ulcers: A resident admitted with AFib, chronic fatigue, and adult failure to thrive developed multiple pressure ulcers, including wounds to both buttocks and a new unstageable heel wound. The care plan addressed general skin risk and the buttock wounds, but it did not include a plan for the current heel ulcers or measurable, time-based interventions for all identified needs. Staff interviews showed CNAs were not consistently familiar with the resident’s wound care needs, and leadership stated care plans were expected to be followed and updated when new wounds occurred.
Care Plan Not Revised After Fall Event: A resident with CHF, dementia, and generalized weakness had a fall documented in an event report, with fall mats to both sides of the bed listed as the immediate intervention. Later observations showed only one fall mat in place, and the care plan was not reviewed and revised to reflect the intervention as documented by the facility's IDT, MDS Nurse, DON, and Administrator.
Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Care and Prevention: A resident admitted with chronic fatigue and adult failure to thrive had pressure injuries documented on the buttocks and later developed worsening buttock wounds plus new heel ulcers. Records showed inconsistent skin documentation at admission, no initial wound orders from the hospital discharge, and wounds that progressed to necrotic tissue, slough, eschar, and bleeding. Staff interviews reflected limited familiarity with the resident’s wound needs, and observations showed a heel wound without a dressing and actively bleeding.
A resident’s commode was observed to be unstable, rocking side to side and front to back because it was not secured to the floor. Paper towels had been stuffed between the base and the floor in an apparent attempt to stabilize it. The MA stated the commode had been installed incorrectly and was unsafe, and the Administrator later acknowledged it was a potential safety hazard.
A medication error rate above 5% was identified when an LPN observed that a resident’s scheduled hydrocodone-acetaminophen dose had not been given and no reason had been documented at the time, and that the resident’s scheduled saccharomyces boulardii dose was unavailable in the cart and pyxis. The MAR later reflected the missed narcotic dose as not administered and the probiotic dose as unavailable, while the LPN stated the physician/medical director would be notified.
The facility failed to maintain infection control practices for residents on contact precautions and EBP. A resident with C. difficile was taken out of the room in a wheelchair without PPE, and staff entered rooms of residents with MRSA, wound infections, and other isolation orders without gowns and gloves. A housekeeper handled trash with bare hands, and multiple CNAs and a COTA provided care or entered rooms without PPE despite posted precaution signage. Interviews showed staff confusion about when PPE was required, while facility leaders stated PPE should be worn before entering rooms on contact precautions.
The facility failed to follow professional standards for food safety, with improper thawing of meat and expired food in the cooler. Observations showed meat thawed in sinks and at room temperature, against FDA guidelines. Expired items like peaches, pears, and cheese were found in the cooler. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to policies on thawing, labeling, and dating food.
The facility was found deficient for failing to properly store and cover garbage in the kitchen. An uncovered trash receptacle, nearly full, was observed close to the food prep area. Interviews with the Dietary Manager, Regional Director of Operations, and Administrator confirmed that trash bins should be covered and stored away from food prep areas, but this was not adhered to.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents, omitting safety measures like lock boxes for smoking materials and proper staffing for transfers. Observations revealed residents with smoking paraphernalia outside lock boxes and a resident transferred by one CNA instead of two, contrary to care plans. The Activities Director and MDS Coordinator were unaware of these omissions, and the DON and Administrator stressed the importance of following care plans for safety.
The facility failed to enter wound treatment orders for two residents, leading to deficiencies in care. One resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer did not have orders entered for five days, resulting in inconsistent wound care. Another resident had wounds but no treatment orders entered until mid-March, despite daily treatments being performed by an LPN. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness and communication among staff regarding treatment orders.
The facility failed to enforce its smoking policy, as residents were found with unsecured smoking materials and smoking in prohibited areas. Additionally, a CNA transferred a resident alone using a mechanical lift, against the care plan requiring two staff members. The DON and Administrator were unaware of these violations, expecting adherence to policies and care plans.
The facility failed to store drugs and biologicals according to professional standards, with an undated multidose vial of Tubersol and expired wound care products found in a medication room. Interviews with LPNs and the DON highlighted the importance of dating medications and discarding them after expiration to prevent adverse effects.
A facility failed to maintain infection control during wound care for a resident with a chronic Stage 4 sacral wound. An LPN, after using a non-sterile gauze, did not change gloves before reaching into a package of non-sterile 4x4 dressings, compromising their sterility. The LPN was unaware of the breach, and the facility's Staff Development Coordinator noted that staff were educated annually on infection control. The Administrator expected adherence to facility policies.
The facility did not ensure residents could view the State Survey Agency's survey results and Plan of Correction. Observations showed the results were not accessible, and no signage was posted to inform residents and visitors. Interviews revealed residents were unaware of the survey results' location, despite discussions in meetings. The Activity Director and Administrator acknowledged the oversight, citing staff turnover as a contributing factor.
Inaccurate Admission MDS Coding for Wounds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the admission MDS Assessment accurately reflected the resident’s current status for one sampled resident. The resident was admitted on 10/13/2025 with diagnoses of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic fatigue, and adult failure to thrive. The facility’s admission Observation assessment, signed by an LPN, documented normal skin color, warm temperature, dry skin moisture, and noted no wounds under alterations in skin. The admission MDS Assessment, with an ARD of 10/17/2025, coded the resident as cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, but also indicated a stage 2 pressure ulcer and an unstageable deep tissue injury present on admission. The MDS Nurse stated she coded the pressure ulcers as present on admission because they had developed and were assessed before the ARD, but acknowledged there was no documentation showing wounds on admission in the hospital discharge information or the facility’s admission Observation assessment. She also stated she had not seen documentation of wounds in the hospital or at discharge and would have expected treatment orders on admission if pressure ulcers were present. The DON and Administrator both stated the MDS should be coded accurately and that the wound information should have been verified using the admission assessment and hospital discharge summary before coding the resident as having wounds on admission.
Incomplete Care Plan for Resident With Multiple Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of one resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic fatigue, and adult failure to thrive, and the admission MDS showed a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy required a comprehensive care plan for each resident, including resident-specific interventions and review and revision by the IDT after comprehensive and quarterly assessments. Review of the resident’s records showed skin concerns identified shortly after admission, including a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the left buttock and a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the right buttock. The comprehensive care plan dated 10/14/2025 identified the resident as at risk for skin impairment related to hypertension, malnutrition, impaired mobility, and pain, with interventions for staff to assist with turning and repositioning during routine rounds, perform weekly skin inspections on shower days, and use a pressure reduction mattress. The goal stated the resident would not have skin complications related to risk of skin impairment through 01/23/2026, and this goal was updated on 11/05/2025 with no changes. The facility later developed an integumentary care plan related to the buttock pressure ulcers, with interventions including encouraging the resident to shift positions in bed and turn from side to side, and pressure-relieving boots to both heels as the resident would allow. However, the record showed no plan of care for the resident’s current pressure ulcers on both heels, including a new unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel documented as a blood-filled blister. Staff interviews reflected that CNAs were not consistently familiar with the resident’s wounds or care needs, and the ADON, DON, and Administrator stated that care plans were expected to be developed, followed, and updated when new wounds occurred.
Care Plan Not Revised After Fall Event
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised for Resident R21 after a fall event. R21 was admitted on 10/17/2024 with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure, unspecified dementia, and generalized muscle weakness. The quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/17/2025 showed a BIMS score of 9 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and the resident was coded as having no behavioral symptoms, rejection of care, or wandering. The facility’s Event Report dated 11/07/2025 documented that R21 sustained a fall after stating he was leaning over trying to get his cup, and the immediate intervention was fall mats to both sides of the bed with therapy notified. However, observations on 12/03/2025, 12/05/2025, and 12/06/2025 showed a fall mat on the right side of the bed but no fall mat on the left side. The MDS Nurse stated care plan revisions were made when the IDT came together and reviewed the full care plan, while the DON stated any intervention listed on an investigation was to be on the care plan and implemented by staff. The Administrator stated an intervention from an event report was to be added to the care plan immediately, and that if it was not placed on the care plan, no one would know it should be followed.
Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Care and Prevention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevention for one resident who was admitted with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic fatigue, and adult failure to thrive. The facility’s policy required full body skin assessments on admission, readmission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury, with findings documented in the medical record. The resident’s admission MDS assessed him as cognitively intact, but the admission observation assessment documented normal skin findings and no alterations in skin, while the admission MDS identified a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the right buttock and an unstageable deep tissue injury on the left buttock present on admission. The hospital discharge summary showed no documented pressure ulcers at discharge and no physician wound care orders on discharge. After admission, the resident’s wound records showed a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left buttock and a stage 3 pressure ulcer on the right buttock, with the right buttock wound later worsening to an unstageable wound with necrotic tissue, slough, and eschar. The resident also developed new unstageable pressure ulcers to both heels, with the left heel later documented as a pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue and the right heel progressing to a stage 3 pressure ulcer with eschar and necrotic tissue. Physician orders for wound care and pressure relief were added over time, including barrier cream, Triad cream, cleansing and collagen dressings, a low air loss mattress, pressure-relieving boots, skin prep to the heels, and later treatment for the right heel. The care plan identified the resident as at risk for skin impairment and later added pressure ulcer interventions, including pressure reduction measures, moisture barrier use, incontinent care, weekly skin inspections, avoiding shearing, and assistance with turning and repositioning. Despite these documented interventions, staff interviews reflected limited familiarity with the resident because staff rotated halls, and one CNA stated he had not known the resident had a buttock wound until assisting with care. During observation, the resident was seen lying in bed with pressure-relieving boots and a low air loss mattress, and on one occasion the right heel had no dressing in place and was actively bleeding. The resident stated he had sores on both feet and his backside and denied having them when admitted. The DON and Administrator stated the resident had poor intake, refused to eat at times, sometimes refused to turn, and had adult failure to thrive, while wound care was expected to be completed as ordered.
Unsecured Commode in Resident Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment for one sampled resident, R21, because the resident’s commode was not secured properly. R21 stated that the commode needed repairing. Observation of the commode in the resident’s room showed that the base was not secured to the floor, causing it to rotate side to side and rock front to back. On a later observation, the commode remained in the same unstable condition, and multiple brown paper towels were stuffed between the base of the commode and the floor in an attempt to stabilize or level it. During interview, the Maintenance Assistant stated he and his boss had recently removed the old commode and installed the current one, but said it had been installed incorrectly. He stated the commode was unstable and unsafe and needed to be corrected. He also said he believed the paper towels had been placed there by nurse aides trying to help. The Administrator later stated she had been informed of the commode condition and agreed it was a potential safety hazard.
Medication Error Rate Exceeded Due to Missed and Unavailable Doses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent, affecting 1 of 8 residents observed during medication administration, a resident who had orders for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg at 4:00 PM and saccharomyces boulardii 250 mg between 7:00 PM and 11:00 PM. During observation, the 4:00 PM hydrocodone-acetaminophen dose had not been administered when the LPN reviewed the MAR during bedtime medication preparation, and there was no documented reason for the omission at that time. The LPN later documented the dose as Not Administered: Other and stated it would not be made up because it was discovered several hours late and too close to the next scheduled dose at 12:00 AM. During the same observation, the LPN found that no saccharomyces boulardii was available in the medication cart or the pyxis for the resident’s scheduled bedtime dose. The MAR documented the dose as Not Administered: Drug/Item Unavailable. The LPN stated she did not know why the medication was unavailable or why it had not previously been ordered, and she ordered a replacement medication. The DON stated staff were expected to check the omnicell if the cart had none of an ordered medication and to use the EMR reorder function when medications reached the designated reorder level. The Administrator stated she expected all residents to receive medications as ordered.
Failure to Follow Contact Precautions and PPE Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four sampled residents. The deficiency involved Residents 4, 91, 93, and 95, all of whom had orders or signage for contact precautions or enhanced barrier precautions, yet staff were observed entering rooms or providing care without the required PPE, or in one case moving a resident out of the room without PPE in place. Resident 95 was admitted with diagnoses including C. difficile enterocolitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, and an arteriovenous fistula. A contact isolation order was in place for C. difficile. A COTA was observed pushing the resident in a wheelchair out of the room and through the hallway to therapy without PPE on either the staff member or the resident. The COTA stated he had worn a gown in the room but removed it before exiting with the resident, and the resident stated he had been leaving his room. Resident 91 had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, chronic fatigue, failure to thrive, and pressure ulcers, and had contact isolation orders related to MRSA and a coccyx wound infection with Pseudomonas and Staph. A CNA entered the room without PPE despite contact precaution signage and stated she thought PPE was only needed for direct care. Resident 93 was admitted with diagnoses including failure to thrive, acute kidney failure, sepsis, and MRSA, and had isolation signage posted. Staff were observed entering and leaving the room without PPE, including a CNA who went to the linen cart and returned without donning PPE, a housekeeper who removed trash with bare hands and then entered another resident’s room, and additional CNA and COTA staff who entered the room without PPE. Resident 4 had enhanced barrier precaution signage, and two CNAs were observed providing direct care without PPE. Staff interviews showed confusion about when PPE was required, with some stating they believed PPE was only needed for direct care or that they had forgotten to put it on, while facility leaders stated staff should don PPE before entering rooms on contact precautions.
Deficiencies in Food Safety Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, specifically in the areas of thawing, storing, labeling, and dating food. Observations revealed that meat was improperly thawed in sinks and at room temperature, contrary to the FDA Food Code 2022, which requires thawing under refrigeration or under running water. Interviews with staff, including the Dietary Manager and the Administrator, confirmed that the facility's policy was not followed, and there was a lack of awareness about the specific policy details. The Regional Director of Operations stated that staff had been educated on proper thawing procedures, but these were not implemented. Additionally, the facility did not properly label and date food items in the walk-in cooler, leading to the presence of expired and outdated food. Observations noted several expired items, including sliced peaches, pears with a white-green substance, boiled eggs, Parmesan cheese, banana pudding, shredded cheese, and bacon grease. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and other staff indicated that there was an expectation for daily checks of the cooler for expired items, but this was not consistently done. The Administrator and Regional Director of Operations confirmed that staff were expected to label and date items and check for expired food, but these procedures were not followed during the Dietary Manager's absence.
Improper Garbage Storage in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and coverage of garbage in the kitchen, as observed during a survey. A large, uncovered trash receptacle, nearly full of trash, was found approximately four steps away from the food preparation area. The Dietary Manager, during an interview, stated that staff were expected to keep trash bins covered and away from food prep areas. Further interviews with staff, including the Regional Director of Operations and the Administrator, confirmed that the expectation was for trash bins to be covered and stored away from areas where food was being prepared or served. Despite these expectations, the trash receptacle was improperly stored and uncovered, leading to the deficiency noted by the surveyors.
Deficiencies in Comprehensive Care Plans and Safety Protocols
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for three residents, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet their needs. For one resident, the care plan addressed respiratory issues related to nicotine dependence but did not include the use of a lock box for smoking paraphernalia, which was observed in the resident's room. The resident was seen with cigarettes and a lighter outside the lock box, and the Activities Director admitted that the care plans should have included the lock boxes as a safety measure. The MDS Coordinator and the Administrator were unaware of the omission in the care plans. Another resident, who was also an independent smoker, had a care plan that did not reflect the use of a lock box for cigarettes and lighters. Observations showed the resident with smoking materials outside the lock box, and the Activities Director confirmed that the care plans should have included this safety measure. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged her responsibility to ensure smoking was addressed in the care plans, but she was unaware of the lock boxes. A third resident required assistance from two staff members and a mechanical lift for transfers, as per the care plan. However, a CNA was observed transferring the resident alone, citing the unavailability of additional staff. The resident confirmed that transfers were sometimes done by one person, and the CNA admitted to not following the care plan. The DON and Administrator emphasized the importance of adhering to care plans to ensure resident safety, but the deficiency highlighted a lapse in following established protocols.
Failure to Enter Wound Treatment Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to enter wound treatment orders upon receipt for two residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Resident 237 was admitted with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer and other serious health conditions. Despite having wound care instructions from the acute hospital, including the use of a wound vac, these orders were not entered into the facility's electronic medical record (EMR) until five days after admission. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the treatment orders, resulting in inconsistent wound care and documentation. Resident 99 was admitted with wounds on the coccyx and foot, but no treatment orders were entered until mid-March, despite the resident being seen by the Wound Care APRN in February. The former Unit Manager/LPN personally completed the treatments daily, relying on memory rather than documented orders. This lack of formal documentation and entry of orders into the EMR contributed to the deficiency in care for Resident 99. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing and the Administrator, highlighted expectations that orders should be entered on the same day they are received. However, the failure to adhere to this protocol resulted in a lack of proper wound care management for both residents, as evidenced by the absence of documented treatment orders and inconsistent application of prescribed wound care procedures.
Deficiencies in Smoking Policy Enforcement and Resident Transfer Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents' safety and adequate supervision to prevent accidents related to smoking in prohibited areas and unsecured smoking paraphernalia. Three residents were observed with smoking materials lying on their beds and bedside tables instead of being secured in the provided lockboxes. Despite being aware of the policy, residents admitted to not securing their smoking materials, and staff interviews revealed a lack of enforcement of the smoking policy. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to its policy for safe handling and transfers, as evidenced by a CNA transferring a resident alone using a mechanical lift, contrary to the care plan that required two staff members for such transfers. The resident, who was cognitively intact, confirmed that transfers were sometimes conducted by one staff member instead of two. The CNA admitted to not following the care plan due to a lack of available staff assistance. Interviews with the DON and Administrator highlighted that they were unaware of the smoking policy violations and expected staff to follow care plans and facility policies. The failure to secure smoking materials and ensure proper transfer procedures indicates a lack of adherence to established safety protocols, potentially compromising resident safety.
Improper Storage and Labeling of Medications and Biologicals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored according to the manufacturer's specifications and accepted professional nursing principles. During an observation of the medication room servicing the 100 and 200 halls, it was found that there was an open and undated multidose vial of Tubersol, an injectable solution used for tuberculosis testing, in the refrigerator. Additionally, there were sixty-two wound care products, including calcium alginate dressings and Promogran collagen matrix, that were beyond their expiration dates and still available for use. Interviews with LPNs and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that it is important to date all medications when opened and not use them beyond their expiration date to prevent potential inaccurate results, loss of potency, or adverse reactions. The DON stated that multidose vials should be dated when opened and discarded after 30 days. The facility's policy on medication administration requires that medications be administered by licensed nurses or authorized staff in accordance with professional standards to prevent contamination or infection, and expired medications should be reported to the nurse manager.
Infection Control Breach During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain safe and sanitary infection control precautions during wound care for a resident with a chronic Stage 4 wound to the sacrum. The resident was admitted with specific physician's orders for wound care, which included the use of Dakin's solution and a wet to dry dressing. During an observation of wound care, an LPN was seen cleaning the overbed table, laying a clean barrier, and placing wound care supplies on it. The supplies included non-sterile 4x4 dressings, wound cleanser spray, Dakin's solution, a bordered gauze dressing, and a non-sterile cup. The LPN washed her hands, donned a gown and gloves, and proceeded with the wound care procedure. However, after using a non-sterile gauze to pat the wound, the LPN discarded it but did not change gloves before reaching into the package of non-sterile 4x4 dressings, which compromised the sterility of the remaining dressings. Interviews conducted with the LPN and the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) revealed that the LPN was unaware of the breach in infection control protocol. The SDC stated that staff were educated annually on infection control and wound care through a competency skills fair, which involved observation of staff performing tasks on a mannequin. The Administrator expressed the expectation that staff follow the facility's policies. The incident highlighted a lapse in adherence to infection control procedures during wound care, as outlined in the facility's policies.
Failure to Provide Access to Survey Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents could exercise their right to view the results of the State Survey Agency's (SSA) survey and the facility's Plan of Correction. Observations from late July to early August 2024 revealed that the survey results were not readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives. There was no signage posted to inform residents and visitors where the survey results could be viewed. The SSA Surveyor was unable to locate the survey results until they were specifically requested, at which point the receptionist retrieved them from a drawer at the front desk. Interviews with residents indicated a lack of awareness regarding the location of the survey results. Despite discussions about the survey results in resident council meetings, several residents with intact cognition scores were unaware of where the survey results were located. The Activity Director confirmed that the survey results binder should have been in the lobby area but was unsure why it was not there. The Administrator acknowledged the requirement for survey results to be available and visible but was unaware that signage was necessary. The facility had experienced significant staff turnover, contributing to the oversight.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 107 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Paducah
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parkview Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| River Haven Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Providence Pointe Healthcare | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Southgate Health Care Center | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 1 |
| Metropolis Rehab & Hcc | 8.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 41 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Stonecreek Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.