Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Advanced Health Care Of Overland Park during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to submit completed abuse/neglect investigations to the State Agency (SA) within the required five working days for two residents. In one case, a resident’s representative reported that the resident used the call light for urgent medical assistance during the night, staff did not respond in a timely manner, and the resident remained unattended while in acute physical distress. In another case, a resident with a clogged catheter was reportedly pushed into the lobby for discharge so a new admission could use the room, and the resident was instead sent to the hospital at the representative’s request. Although both allegations were reported to the SA, the completed investigations were not submitted on time due to miscommunication and assumptions between administrative staff, and the facility’s abuse policy did not specify the required timeframe for submission to the SA.
The facility failed to complete and submit required abuse/neglect investigations after allegations from two residents’ representatives. In one case, a resident’s representative reported that the resident used the call light for urgent help during the night, was left unattended while in acute distress, and vomited without timely staff response. In the other case, a resident’s representative alleged the resident had a clogged catheter and was pushed into the lobby for discharge so a new admission could take the room, leading the representative to cancel the discharge and request hospital transfer. Although staff obtained witness statements, reviewed the chart, and in one case reviewed video footage, the facility did not produce the written investigative summaries and complete documentation required by its abuse policy, and only partial materials were available when requested by the SA and surveyors.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards, with multiple instances of improperly labeled and undated food items found in the kitchen's storage areas. Dietary staff acknowledged the requirement for labeling and dating food packaging, as per the facility's policy, but the failure to adhere to these standards placed residents at risk of food-borne illnesses.
The facility failed to implement a policy to prevent employing staff with criminal backgrounds, as evidenced by not conducting a required background check for an LN hired to work weekends. The LN was initially hired for home health and hospice services, and the facility did not perform its own check when the LN transitioned to the facility. This oversight placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect.
The facility failed to secure hazardous materials, such as medicated ointments and bleach wipes, in unlocked treatment carts accessible to eight cognitively impaired residents. Staff interviews confirmed that these items should be locked away, as per the facility's policy, to prevent accidents and injuries.
A resident with a history of fractures and mild cognitive impairment was found without access to her call light, which was on the floor and out of reach. Despite facility policies and staff statements emphasizing the importance of call light accessibility, the resident's call light was not within reach, placing her at risk for unmet care needs.
A facility failed to provide a resident with a CMS Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form upon discharge from Medicare A services. The resident, with intact cognition, was discharged home without receiving the required notice, despite having benefit days remaining. The facility's policy required providing the NOMNC at least two days before service termination, which was not followed.
A resident with pancreatic cancer and at risk for skin breakdown did not receive consistent bathing opportunities as per the care plan. Despite a policy for twice-weekly baths, records showed missed opportunities, and the resident reported poor hygiene conditions. Upon hospital transfer, the resident was found with a pressure injury and poor hygiene, highlighting documentation and care inconsistencies.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter was at risk for complications due to improper positioning of the urine collection bag above bladder level, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the requirement for the bag to be below bladder level for proper drainage.
The facility failed to serve meals at appropriate temperatures, affecting two residents who reported receiving cold meals, particularly during breakfast. Temperature tests confirmed the food was below the safe range. Staff interviews revealed concerns about meal delivery times and the need for temperature checks, highlighting a deficiency in maintaining food service standards.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary infection control standards for biliary drains and Foley catheters, placing residents at risk for infections. Observations showed catheter and drainage bags resting on the floor, contrary to policy. Staff interviews confirmed expectations for proper placement, but compliance was lacking.
Failure to Submit Completed Abuse/Neglect Investigations Within Required Timeframe
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to submit completed abuse/neglect investigations to the State Agency (SA) within the required five working-day timeframe for two residents. For one resident, the facility reported an allegation to the SA that the resident’s representative had emailed the facility stating that, between 2:00 AM and 3:00 AM, the resident activated the call light for urgent medical assistance, staff did not respond in a timely manner, and the resident remained unattended while in acute physical distress. The intake was documented at 3:00 PM the same day, and the facility spoke with the resident, who did not remember what time she vomited. Although the allegation was reported to the SA, the facility did not submit the completed investigation within five working days as required. For the second resident, the facility reported an allegation to the SA that the resident had a clogged catheter and staff pushed him into the lobby for discharge so a new admission could have his room. The resident’s representative canceled transportation for the discharge, and the resident went to the hospital at the representative’s request. This allegation was also reported to the SA, but the completed investigation was not submitted within five working days. During interviews, an administrative nurse stated she did not submit the completed investigations for either resident to the SA, and an administrative staff member stated he assumed the nurse had submitted one investigation and did not submit the other because he thought she had done so. The facility’s abuse policy required the Administrator or DON to complete a written investigation summary within five working days of the reported occurrence but did not address the timeframe for submitting completed investigations to the SA.
Failure to Complete and Submit Abuse/Neglect Investigations for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the facility’s failure to complete and submit thorough abuse/neglect investigations for two residents after receiving allegations from their representatives. For the first resident, who had been admitted and later discharged home, the State Agency (SA) received an intake alleging that between 2:00 AM and 3:00 AM the resident activated the call light for urgent medical assistance, staff did not respond in a timely manner, and the resident remained unattended while in acute physical distress, including vomiting, which she later reported to her representative. The facility interviewed the resident, who did not recall the time she vomited, and staff were interviewed about events on and around the alleged date. However, when surveyors and the SA requested a completed investigation, the facility only produced staff witness statements and did not provide a written investigative summary or other required documentation. For the second resident, who had been admitted and later transferred to the hospital, the SA received an intake alleging that the resident’s catheter was clogged and that staff pushed the resident into the lobby for discharge so a new admission could use the room; the representative canceled the discharge and arranged for hospital transfer. Facility staff reported that the DON/designee reviewed catheter care notes and that an administrator reviewed video footage of the discharge and documented a brief note, and two nurses were contacted for their recollection of events. Despite these steps, the facility again failed to provide a completed investigation to the SA or onsite surveyors, supplying only staff witness statements. Interviews with the Administrative Nurse and Administrative Staff revealed that each assumed the other had submitted the completed investigations, and no written summary consistent with the facility’s abuse policy—requiring a completed investigation with a written summary of findings within five working days—was produced for either allegation.
Deficient Food Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage, as observed during a survey. Multiple instances of improperly labeled and undated food items were found in the kitchen's dry food storage room, main kitchen area, and walk-in freezer. These included containers of pistachios, puree pasta mix, honey wheat flavoring, potato pearls mashed potatoes, white rice, browning and seasoning sauce, bran flakes, brown powder, pie filling mix, yellow cake mix, pretzels, carrots, green beans, hashbrowns, and steaks. The lack of labeling and dating on these items was noted during observations conducted on specific dates and times. Dietary staff acknowledged the requirement for food packaging to be labeled and dated when opened, as per the facility's Food Storage policy. This policy, created in January 2021, mandates that all high-risk foods be visibly date-marked to indicate their safe use-by dates. The policy also requires that all containers be legibly and accurately labeled and dated, and that frozen foods be covered, labeled, and dated. Despite these guidelines, the facility's failure to adhere to these standards placed residents at risk of food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns.
Failure to Conduct Timely Background Checks for Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a policy that effectively prohibited and prevented the employment of staff with criminal backgrounds. This deficiency was identified when the facility did not conduct a required criminal background check for a Licensed Nurse (LN) who was hired to work weekends. The LN was initially hired for home health and hospice services under the same company, which had completed a background check. However, when the LN transitioned to work at the facility, the facility did not perform its own background check, as required. The facility's policy allowed for a 10-day period after employment to conduct background checks, which contributed to the oversight. The facility's undated Abuse Policy and Procedure stated that it would not knowingly employ individuals with a history of abuse, neglect, or other misconduct. Despite this, the facility's failure to conduct a timely background check for the LN placed all residents at risk for abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or mistreatment. The administrative staff acknowledged the oversight and the lack of documentation for the LN's background check, highlighting a gap in the facility's hiring and documentation processes.
Failure to Secure Hazardous Materials in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from hazardous chemicals and materials for eight cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. During a walkthrough of the facility's Two Hall, an unlocked wound treatment cart was found containing medicated ointments and Sani-Cloth bleach wipes, both labeled with warnings to keep out of reach of children. A similar unsecured cart was found in One Hall, containing bottles of diclofenac, disposable medical scalpels, and bleach wipes. These items were accessible to residents, which was against the facility's policy. Interviews with staff, including a CNA, a licensed nurse, and administrative staff, confirmed that treatment carts should be locked when not in use, and chemical cleaning products should always be secured. The facility's Accident and Incident policy, revised in June 2024, stated that the environment should be free from potential hazards, including chemicals. The failure to secure these items placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries.
Failure to Ensure Resident's Call Light Accessibility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as R75, had access to her call light to communicate her needs or call for help. R75's medical records indicated she had a history of fractures, insomnia, and repeated falls, with a mild cognitive impairment. Her care plan required that her call light be within reach due to her limited mobility and risk of falls. However, during an observation, it was noted that R75's call light was on the floor and out of her reach, which she confirmed she could not safely access. A CNA later entered the room and corrected the situation by placing the call light back on the bed. Interviews with staff, including a CNA and a licensed nurse, confirmed that call lights should always be within reach of residents, either clipped to their clothing or on the bed. The facility's policy also stated that call lights should be accessible. Despite these guidelines, the facility did not ensure R75's call light was within reach, placing her at risk for unmet care needs.
Failure to Provide NOMNC Form to Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a resident, identified as R82, with a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form CMS-10095 upon discharge from Medicare A services. R82 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition, and was discharged home without anticipation of returning to the facility. The Beneficiary Protection Notification Review showed that R82 began Medicare Part A skilled services on 07/08/24, with the last covered day being 08/29/24. Despite having benefit days remaining, the facility initiated her discharge from skilled services. Upon request on 09/24/24, the facility was unable to provide a completed NOMNC for R82. An administrative nurse acknowledged the missing documentation and stated that the facility was working to address the issue. The facility's policy, revised in 09/2022, required providing the NOMNC at least two days prior to termination of services, which was not adhered to in this case.
Inconsistent Bathing Opportunities for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for a resident, identified as R18, who was at risk for skin breakdown and pressure injuries due to immobility and other medical conditions. R18's medical records indicated a need for supervision and assistance with activities of daily living, including bathing. Despite the care plan specifying twice-weekly showers, the Treatment Administration Report (TAR) showed missed bathing opportunities on several occasions, with only one bath documented since admission. R18 reported feeling unwell and noted that her drainage bag often fell on the floor, contributing to her discomfort. Observations revealed poor hygiene, with greasy hair, untrimmed nails, and a strong odor of urine and body odor in her room. Upon transfer to an acute care facility, R18 was found to have a pressure injury and poor hygiene, as reported by a consultant. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA and a licensed nurse, confirmed that bathing schedules were in place, but documentation of refusals or missed baths was inconsistent. The facility's policy required documentation of completed, missed, or refused bathing opportunities, which was not adhered to in R18's case. This lack of consistent care and documentation placed R18 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and other complications.
Inadequate Foley Catheter Care for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate Foley catheter care for a resident, identified as R16, by not maintaining the urine collection bag below the level of the bladder, which is necessary for proper drainage. R16's medical history includes chronic kidney disease, spinal stenosis, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and anxiety disorder. The resident was dependent on staff for various activities of daily living and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Observations revealed that the urine collection bag was positioned on the center of the footboard, higher than the bladder, with foamy yellow urine pooled in the drainage tubing towards the body. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA, LN, and an administrative nurse, confirmed that urinary catheters should be positioned below the bladder level to ensure proper drainage and prevent contamination. The facility's policy on indwelling urinary catheter care, revised in July 2023, also stipulated that the drainage bag should remain below the bladder level, off the floor, and in a privacy bag. The failure to adhere to these guidelines placed R16 at risk for catheter-related complications, including urinary tract infections.
Deficiency in Serving Meals at Appropriate Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that meals were served at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature for two residents, R75 and R76. Observations and interviews revealed that residents frequently received cold meals, particularly during breakfast. R75 reported that the food was often cold in the mornings, and although staff were available to reheat the food upon request, she did not want her food reheated. Similarly, R76 stated that breakfast was often cold by the time it reached her room. Temperature tests conducted on their breakfast trays confirmed that the food items, including scrambled eggs, oatmeal, and cherry crumble, were served at temperatures significantly below the appropriate range. Interviews with staff members further highlighted the issue. A Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) acknowledged that residents had concerns about the temperature of food delivered to their rooms and suggested that staff should test food temperatures before serving. Dietary Staff BB mentioned that a recent mock survey had identified concerns with meal service, and the facility should be using heaters and testing trays to maintain appropriate food temperatures. The facility's Food Service policy indicated that meals should be served within appropriate temperature ranges, but the practice of delivering meals to rooms without maintaining these standards led to the deficiency.
Infection Control Deficiency in Catheter and Drain Maintenance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to sanitary infection control standards concerning the maintenance of biliary drains and Foley catheters, which placed residents at risk for infectious diseases. During observations, it was noted that a resident's urinary catheter collection bag was resting flat on the floor beside her bed, and another resident's biliary drain tubing was running over her bed covers with the drainage collection bag also on the floor. These practices were contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates that drainage bags should remain below the level of the bladder, off the floor, and within a privacy bag. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of compliance with the facility's infection control policies. A CNA acknowledged that medical drains and catheter bags should never touch the floor and should be positioned below the bladder level to prevent backflow. A licensed nurse and an administrative nurse both confirmed that staff were expected to check the placement of catheter bags during each interaction with residents, ensuring they were off the floor and properly positioned. Despite these expectations, the facility's failure to maintain sanitary conditions for medical drains and catheters was evident, as observed by the surveyors.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 854 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 26 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Overland Park
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overland Park Post Acute | 0.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Swan Health At Overland Park | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Brookdale Overland Park | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Ignite Medical Resort Carondelet Llc | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 34 | 0 |
| Village Shalom Inc | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Advanced Health Care Of Overland Park.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.