Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A staffing shortage on one unit led to widespread missed medication doses when a nurse called off and the remaining LPN informed the DON she could not complete all medication passes for residents assigned to a medication cart. As a result, multiple residents with complex conditions such as HF, AFib, HTN, DM, COPD, psychiatric disorders, paraplegia, quadriplegia, and developmental disorders did not receive ordered day-shift medications, including antihypertensives, anticoagulants, antidiabetics, psychotropics, pain medications, respiratory agents, GI medications, and supplements. MAR review confirmed that these scheduled medications were not administered, and the facility could not provide a policy on sufficient nurse staffing.
Surveyors found that staff failed to consistently complete controlled substance shift-change count sheets for one medication cart. Over multiple days and shifts, required fields such as the total number of controlled medication packets in the cart and the signatures of off-going and on-coming nurses were frequently left blank. The ADON confirmed that facility practice and written policy require two nurses to count controlled meds at each shift change or key exchange, document any packets added or removed, record the total items, and both sign the count sheet, but this was not done as required for the affected cart.
The facility failed to prevent physical abuse when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a documented history of verbal and physical aggression repeatedly punched another severely cognitively impaired resident in the head while seated in a common area, causing a raised knot on the forehead and requiring hospital evaluation. The aggressive resident had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and antisocial personality disorder, and the care plan called for line-of-sight supervision and avoiding the resident’s personal space when agitated. Despite an abuse prevention policy intended to prevent physical abuse, the assault occurred in a shared area and resulted in injury.
A resident with multiple medical conditions, including heart failure and morbid obesity, had an order for PRN oxycodone/acetaminophen 10-325 mg, with 30 tablets documented on the controlled drug record. Facility records showed that one tablet was removed on one day and two more the next, leaving 18 tablets, even though the resident had already been transferred to the hospital and had not returned. A QMA discovered the discrepancy during narcotic count reconciliation, and the DON confirmed that three tablets had been signed out while the resident was absent and that the facility could not identify the staff member whose initials appeared on the controlled drug record, resulting in misappropriation of the resident’s controlled medication.
Two residents who were cognitively intact and managing their own medications were observed with medication cups at their bedside, containing multiple pills left without staff present, including additional medications placed by an LPN and then left for self-administration. Record review showed multiple scheduled and PRN medications ordered for these residents, but no documented IDT self-administration assessments or physician orders authorizing self-administration, despite a facility policy requiring IDT approval, physician orders, and care plan updates for residents who self-administer medications.
A resident with dementia and depression, who had severely impaired cognition but could make himself understood, reported that another resident had been mean to him, was bothering him, and had hit him on the head in the dining room, causing him to try to avoid that resident. An incident report documented that one resident struck another on the head with an open hand, with no injuries noted, and an LPN separated the residents after being informed of the event by another resident witness; the aggressor did not deny the action, stating the other resident would not be quiet. Observation later showed the aggressor seated behind the abused resident in the dining room, despite an abuse prevention policy that defines physical abuse as willful infliction of injury, including hitting and slapping.
The facility failed to complete and maintain required written statements during an abuse investigation after a resident with Down Syndrome witnessed a verbal argument between a QMA and a CNA. The investigation file contained an incident report and a written statement from the QMA, but no written statement from the CNA, despite the CNA reporting that she had submitted one. The ED stated the CNA’s input was obtained verbally and over the phone and was not documented as a written, signed, and dated statement as required by the facility’s Abuse Prevention Program policy and state regulation.
A resident with paraplegia and neurogenic bladder, who was cognitively intact and on an intermittent self-catheterization regimen, did not consistently receive an adequate supply of single-use 16F straight catheters to follow the ordered every 4–6 hour catheterization schedule. The resident reported repeated delays in obtaining catheters, having only four for an entire day, not emptying his bladder since the prior night, and sometimes reusing catheters when staff either could not locate or reported no supplies. A provider note documented the resident’s concern about running out of catheters and the importance of sterile, single-use technique, while a QMA admitted she was unaware of the increased catheterization frequency and believed it was every 8 hours. Observation showed additional catheters available in the supply room, but only a few at the bedside, and leadership confirmed there was no policy addressing supply availability for self-catheterization.
The facility failed to document and monitor behavioral symptoms as ordered and care planned for two residents with identified behavioral health needs. One resident with dementia and bipolar disorder had a physician’s order and care plan requiring shift‑by‑shift monitoring of specific behaviors, yet no behaviors were recorded on the MAR during the month in which the resident struck another resident, and no behavior note was entered in the clinical record for that incident. Another cognitively intact resident with a personality disorder had an order to monitor and track multiple behaviors and implement specific interventions, but when the resident became curt and then screamed and yelled at an LPN about medication, no behavior was documented on the MAR/TAR and no interventions were recorded in the clinical record. These failures occurred despite facility policy requiring nursing to monitor and document target behaviors daily and to use MAR documentation to trigger progress notes.
Food storage and sanitation deficiencies were identified when an outdated gelatin item and an unsealed package of sliced cheese were found in the walk-in refrigerator, and the kitchen floor had a dirty film. Additional observations in a second-floor kitchenette found dried food in the refrigerator, a dirty steam table shelf with white film and rust-looking spots, and a souffle cup with dried-on food inside. Dietary staff acknowledged the unwashed cup, and the DM noted the floor and equipment needed cleaning.
A resident with dementia continued receiving risperidone 0.25 mg at hs for agitation even after the MD documented that the medication should be discontinued because there was no appropriate diagnosis to support its use. Pharmacy had also requested justification for the antipsychotic. The MAR showed the resident kept receiving the medication for several days after the discontinuation was entered, and an RN consultant stated it should have been stopped but was missed.
The facility failed to ensure a transfer form accompanied a resident sent by EMS to the hospital. The resident had Alzheimer's Disease and a history of falls, and the record did not include the required transfer form. The DON stated he could not locate the discharge transfer form, and the facility policy required staff to complete the Resident Transfer form and send it with pertinent health record information.
Care plans were not kept current or aligned with resident discharge wishes, and quarterly care plan meetings were not held timely for two residents. One resident’s record conflicted with documented wishes to stay in the facility, another resident’s discharge plan did not match the family’s request for AL discharge, and two residents had no timely documented care plan conference despite policy requiring quarterly review and family notification by the SSD or designee.
Failure to implement optometry eye drop orders: A resident with glaucoma and severely impaired vision had an eye care plan for glaucoma treatment, but the record lacked an order for latanoprost and the MAR/medication supply did not align with the prescribed eye drops. The resident stated she had not received eye drops in a long time, was observed not receiving them during med pass, and the DON confirmed the eye drops were not transcribed from the eye care note.
Failure to Maintain Availability of PRN Pain Medication: A resident with cancer and pneumonia, who frequently had pain and used PRN narcotic pain medication, was observed in bed with facial grimacing and rubbing his thigh while reporting pain at 8/10. He stated the facility had run out of his pain medicine, and an LPN confirmed the medication was unavailable and gave Tylenol instead. Records showed the resident’s last narcotic dose was the prior evening and the reorder was not sent until later, despite the resident’s pain care plan calling for ordered pain meds and non-pharmacological pain relief.
A resident with anoxic brain injury, tracheostomy, and epilepsy did not receive ordered lacosamide 100 mg BID because the medication was repeatedly unavailable and the pharmacy reported it still needed a correct Rx. Nursing notes showed multiple contacts with the pharmacy and MD, while the DON later stated the MAR was incorrectly documented and the resident had not received any doses since the order was written.
A resident with COPD had a PRN order for hyoscyamine sulfate that pharmacy twice recommended discontinuing because it had not been used in 60 days. Although the provider agreed to stop the medication, the MARs for the following months still listed it as available, and the DON said the recommendations were missed.
Mechanical soft diets and ordered thickened liquids were not provided as prescribed for three residents. Two residents with dementia and dysphagia were served whole kernel corn instead of the ordered mechanically altered diet, and a resident with dysphagia who was ordered nectar thick liquids was given unthickened hot chocolate and began coughing when she drank it.
A facility failed to keep accurate records for medication administration and resident care. A resident with epilepsy had lacosamide documented as given even though the DON said no doses had been administered, a resident with glaucoma had eye drops signed off as given despite not receiving them and no refill being sent, and an LPN documented a resident’s swallowing status inaccurately after pills were given whole in pudding even though the resident reported difficulty swallowing.
An infection prevention and control deficiency was cited after a resident’s indwelling urinary catheter bag was repeatedly observed touching the floor, and during a medication pass an LPN donned gloves without hand hygiene first and attached a needle to an insulin pen without disinfecting the hub. The DON confirmed catheter bags should not contact the floor, and the LPN acknowledged the missed hand hygiene and hub cleansing steps.
A resident with multiple behavioral health diagnoses did not receive a scheduled antipsychotic injection despite the medication being available, and the provider was not notified of the missed dose. Nursing staff inconsistently documented and implemented interventions for frequent medication refusals, and the resident's care plan did not include all effective strategies known to staff, resulting in a deficiency related to behavioral health services.
A resident with cognitive impairment and a history of falls was found transferring from a wheelchair to bed without anti-roll backs in place and while wearing non-nonskid socks. The resident was confused about a wheelchair switch and refused staff assistance. Required fall interventions were not timely implemented or maintained after a fall event.
Two residents did not receive multiple scheduled doses of prescribed medications, including IV antibiotics and controlled substances, due to unavailability and lapses in medication administration records. Documentation showed repeated instances where medications were not on hand or not signed off as administered, despite facility policy requiring prompt action when medications are unavailable.
Two residents experienced significant delays in staff response to call lights, with one resident typically waiting at least 30 minutes and another waiting up to 30 minutes despite requiring substantial toileting assistance. Additionally, a resident and her family reported repeated, unwanted offers of incontinence briefs, which they found humiliating. These actions did not align with facility policies on prompt assistance and resident dignity.
The facility did not ensure timely notification to the physician and family for two residents who experienced significant changes in condition: one with a substantial weight loss while on enteral feedings, and another who developed a new open neck wound related to a trach collar. Documentation did not show that notifications were made promptly as required by policy.
A resident with multiple medical conditions and moderate cognitive impairment did not have a comprehensive care plan addressing their bathing and hygiene needs. Staff interviews confirmed that a care plan for ADLs was overlooked, and a family member reported the resident received very few showers.
A resident with significant medical and cognitive needs did not receive scheduled bathing and hygiene care, as records showed infrequent showers and incomplete documentation of care provided. The resident's care plan for ADLs was not developed as required, and a grievance about the shower schedule was not properly resolved in the documentation.
A resident dependent on continuous enteral feeding experienced an interruption in nutrition when the feeding solution became inaccessible to staff overnight. This resident also suffered a significant weight loss of over 10% in less than a month, which was not promptly identified or addressed by the interdisciplinary team, nor was the physician or family notified as required by facility policy. Documentation failed to reflect the feeding interruption or timely interventions related to the weight loss.
A resident with a tracheostomy developed a new laceration on the neck, but staff failed to document when the wound was first identified, what initial care was provided, and notifications to the physician, family, or administration. The family only became aware of the wound during a radiology appointment, and the nurse who first found the wound did not document the event, resulting in incomplete records.
The facility failed to maintain safe food temperatures during meal service, affecting nearly all residents. Observations revealed that mixed vegetables, fish filets, and French fries were held at temperatures below the required minimum of 135 degrees Fahrenheit, contrary to the facility's food safety guidelines.
The facility did not ensure RN coverage for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, affecting all residents. The absence of RN coverage on specific dates was confirmed by the Staffing Coordinator and DON, with no agency staff used since early April. The facility also lacked a policy on RN coverage.
The facility failed to administer medications and collect urine samples as ordered, affecting multiple residents. A resident with a leg fracture did not have a timely orthopedic follow-up, while another relying on a gastric tube had inadequate weight monitoring. Additionally, a resident's urine sample was not collected, and another did not receive prescribed medications for diabetes and hypertension. These issues indicate non-compliance with physician orders and care plans.
The facility failed to document COVID-19 vaccination education and status for five residents, lacking records of whether they were informed about the 2023-2024 vaccine's benefits and risks, received the vaccine, or refused it. An interview with the Nurse Consultant confirmed the absence of verification for offering or administering the vaccine, despite the facility's policy emphasizing the importance of staying up to date with vaccinations.
A facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity during meal assistance. A resident with dementia and cognitive impairment required help with eating, as per her care plan. During an observation, a CNA was seen standing while assisting the resident with her meal, contrary to the facility's policy that emphasizes treating residents with respect and dignity. The Nurse Consultant confirmed that the CNA should have been sitting to align with the policy.
A resident, who was cognitively intact and had a history of stroke, was dissatisfied with a new rule requiring him to transport his teapot and tea bags from his room to the dining room for each meal. This change forced him to use a wheelchair instead of crutches, and he was not given a reason for the restriction. The Activities Director confirmed the resident's dissatisfaction, but a grievance form was not completed, and the facility's grievance policy was not followed.
The facility failed to submit accurate RN staffing data to CMS, as the PBJ report showed no RN coverage on several dates despite evidence of RN 9 working those days. The system may not have been updated to reflect RN 9's title change after obtaining her license. The facility lacked a policy for PBJ data submission.
The facility inaccurately coded MDS assessments for four residents, indicating bed rails were used as restraints when they were actually used for bed mobility. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator confirmed the coding errors, which were contrary to the facility's policy using the RAI Manual.
A facility failed to accurately complete an MDS assessment for a resident, missing two falls that occurred during the look-back period. The regular MDS staff was on medical leave, and the facility did not have a specific policy for MDS assessments, relying instead on the RAI manual.
Medication Administration Failures Due to Insufficient Nursing Staff
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure sufficient nursing staff to administer ordered medications to multiple residents assigned to the second-floor west hall medication cart. On a specific day, a nurse called off work, and the remaining nurse on that unit reported to the DON that she could not administer medications to all residents on the unit. The DON confirmed that, as a result, medications were not administered to all residents who were to receive medications from that cart. One resident reported that he did not have a nurse on the day shift that day and did not receive his day shift medications. Record review showed that 15 residents did not receive some or all of their ordered medications during the day shift on that date. These residents had multiple diagnoses, including hypertension, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, neuropathy, COPD, liver cancer, delusional disorder, personality disorders, paraplegia, quadriplegia, autistic disorder, Down syndrome, and others. Their ordered medications included antihypertensives (such as amlodipine, lisinopril, metoprolol, spironolactone), anticoagulants/antiplatelets (such as apixaban, Eliquis, aspirin, clopidogrel), antidiabetic agents (such as metformin, empagliflozin, Amaryl), psychotropic and mood-stabilizing medications (such as nortriptyline, escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, bupropion, divalproex, olanzapine, deutetrabenazine, oxcarbazepine), pain medications (such as acetaminophen, naproxen, oxycodone, gabapentin), respiratory and allergy medications (such as montelukast, tiotropium, benzonatate, loratadine), and various supplements and GI medications (such as pantoprazole, omeprazole, folic acid, multivitamins, cholecalciferol, cyanocobalamin, ferrous sulfate, polyethylene glycol, sennosides, and probiotics). The MARs for each of the 15 residents documented that the ordered medications for the day shift on that date were not administered. For example, one resident with phantom limb syndrome, obesity, and depression did not receive multiple antihypertensives, pain medications, antidepressants, antianxiety medication, and neuropathic pain medication. Another resident with bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and asthma did not receive antihypertensives, antidepressants, antiepileptics, antidiabetic agents, supplements, and a pain patch. Similar omissions were documented for residents with heart failure and atrial fibrillation who did not receive ordered anticoagulants, beta-blockers, diuretics, and other daily medications. Additional residents with conditions such as neuropathy, COPD, dementia, liver cancer, ataxia, delusional disorder, paraplegia, quadriplegia, autistic disorder, Down syndrome, and urinary retention did not receive their scheduled medications as ordered. By the end of the survey, the facility was unable to provide a policy regarding sufficient nurse staffing.
Failure to Maintain Complete Controlled Substance Shift-Change Counts
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s procedures for accurately accounting for controlled substances on one of three medication carts reviewed, specifically the second-floor west hall cart. Review of the change-of-shift controlled medication count sheet for this cart, covering 4/1/26 through 4/21/26, showed multiple instances where required documentation was incomplete or missing. On numerous dates and shifts, the "total items in cart" box was left blank, and on several occasions the off-going and/or on-coming nurse signature boxes were not signed. Examples included missing total item counts on multiple shifts across 4/1, 4/2, 4/3, 4/7, 4/8, 4/9, 4/10, 4/12, 4/13, 4/14, 4/15, 4/16, 4/17, 4/18, 4/19, 4/20, and 4/21, as well as missing off-going or on-coming nurse signatures on several of those dates. During interview, the ADON stated that the controlled medication count sheet should be fully completed at every shift change, with the off-going nurse signing, documenting any packets added or removed, and recording the total items in the cart, followed by the on-coming nurse signing after reconciliation. The facility’s written policy on controlled substances, dated 7/2024, requires that two nurses count all controlled substances each shift or whenever keys are exchanged, inspect the medication packets, count the number of packets in the cart, document this on the shift change controlled substance count sheet, and each sign the appropriate boxes to acknowledge that the actual count and the count sheet match. The observed omissions on the west hall second-floor medication cart count sheets showed that these procedures and policy requirements were not consistently followed.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse in Common Area
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from physical abuse when one resident repeatedly punched another resident in the head while both were in a common area. On the date of the incident, an RN reported hearing someone yell and, upon looking over, saw Resident C standing over Resident B and punching Resident B in the head with a closed fist multiple times while Resident B was seated. A progress note documented that Resident B sustained a raised knot on the forehead and was sent to the hospital for further evaluation after being punched on the forehead, face, and back of the head. Police were called and Resident C was taken for psychiatric services. Resident B’s clinical record showed diagnoses including Down syndrome, pseudobulbar affect, and muscle weakness, with an annual MDS indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident C’s record included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and antisocial personality disorder, with a quarterly MDS also indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident C’s care plan, in place prior to the incident, documented a history of conflicts and altercations with other residents, including verbal and physical aggression, and included interventions such as keeping Resident C in line of sight and avoiding entering his personal space when agitated. Despite the facility’s Abuse Prevention Policy stating that it was the policy of the facility to prevent physical abuse, the incident occurred in the common area, resulting in physical harm to Resident B.
Misappropriation of Controlled Pain Medication While Resident Hospitalized
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of property when three tablets of a controlled narcotic pain medication were removed from the medication cart and signed out while the resident was hospitalized and not present in the facility. The resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure, morbid obesity, and adjustment disorder, had a physician’s order for oxycodone/acetaminophen 10-325 mg to be given orally every six hours as needed for pain. A controlled drug record dated late February documented 30 tablets of this medication. Documentation on the controlled drug record showed that one tablet was removed on one date and two tablets were removed on the following date, leaving 18 tablets in the cart, even though the resident had been transferred to the hospital prior to those administrations and had not yet been readmitted. During interviews, the DON reported being made aware that three tablets of the resident’s oxycodone/acetaminophen were missing from the cart and that a staff member had initialed the removals on the controlled drug record, but the facility was unable to identify to whom the initials belonged. A QMA stated that when reconciling narcotic counts, a discrepancy was noted because three tablets had been signed out when the resident was not in the facility, and confirmed that when they last worked there had been 18 tablets remaining. The facility’s Abuse Prevention Policy, provided by the Administrator, indicated it was the facility’s policy to prevent misappropriation of property, but the documented removal and signing out of the resident’s controlled medication while the resident was in the hospital constituted a failure to protect the resident’s belongings from wrongful use.
Failure to Assess and Authorize Resident Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to have the interdisciplinary team (IDT) timely determine and document that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for two cognitively intact residents who were self-administering medications. For one resident with a diagnosis including personality disorder, record review showed multiple current physician orders for daily and scheduled medications such as aspirin, docusate sodium, acetaminophen, vitamin B-12, gabapentin, Prempro, hydroxyzine, and lisinopril. During observation, this resident was in bed with a bedside table holding a cup containing multiple morning medications, with no staff present. The resident stated she was able to take her own medications and would take them later due to heartburn. An LPN then entered to administer lisinopril, placed a second medication cup with the pill on the bedside table next to the first cup, and left the room, leaving the resident in possession of both cups. The clinical record for this resident lacked a current self-administration assessment and a physician’s order authorizing self-administration. For the second resident, who had a diagnosis including schizophrenia and was assessed as cognitively intact on admission, physician orders included Tums every six hours as needed and Buspar three times a day. Observation found this resident sitting on her bed with a bedside table holding a medication cup containing one greenish pill and one pinkish pill, which the resident identified as Tums. The clinical record for this resident also lacked a documented self-administration assessment and a physician’s order to self-administer medications. In an interview, the Nurse Consultant confirmed she was unable to locate current self-administration assessments for either resident. The facility’s self-medication assessment policy required that self-administration be ordered by the attending physician and approved by the IDT, with assessments offered during routine IDT assessments and care plans updated at least quarterly or with changes, but these steps were not documented for the two residents involved.
Failure to Protect Resident From Physical Abuse by Another Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by another resident when one resident struck another on the head with an open hand. The abused resident, identified as having dementia, depression, and severely impaired cognition per a recent MDS, was otherwise able to make himself understood, understood others, and had no behaviors noted during the assessment period. His care plan addressed impaired cognitive function with goals for maintaining orientation. A follow-up progress note documented that he had a resident-to-resident encounter over a weekend and that, although he reported not being bothered, staff observed he appeared anxious afterward. In an interview, he stated that another resident had been mean to him, was “messing with him,” had hit him, and sat behind him in the dining room, leading him to try to stay away from that resident. The facility’s investigation file documented an incident report stating that one resident made contact with the other resident’s head using an open hand, with no injuries noted. An LPN reported she separated the two residents after being informed of the incident by another resident witness, and that the alleged aggressor did not deny hitting the other resident, stating the other resident would not be quiet. Observation of the dining room showed the alleged aggressor sitting at a table behind the abused resident. The facility’s Abuse Prevention Program policy defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, and specifically included hitting and slapping as physical abuse. Despite this policy, the resident experienced physical contact to the head from another resident.
Incomplete Documentation of Abuse Investigation After Staff Verbal Altercation Witnessed by Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to conduct and document a thorough abuse investigation after a resident with Down Syndrome witnessed a verbal altercation between two staff members. The incident report, dated 12/27/25, indicated that the resident observed a verbal disagreement between a QMA and a CNA at the nurses’ station. The facility’s Abuse Prevention Program policy required the charge nurse to complete an incident report and obtain written, signed, and dated statements from the person reporting the incident and from any witnesses, with completed copies provided to the Administrator or person in charge within 24 hours of the incident. Record review and interviews showed that the investigation file contained an incident report and a written statement from the QMA, but did not contain a written statement from the CNA involved in the argument. The ED stated there was no written statement from the CNA and that the CNA had been interviewed verbally with the weekend supervisor, but the interview was not documented. In contrast, the CNA reported that she had written a statement on the date of the incident and given it to the ED, and described the argument as starting over her refusal to serve regular-consistency food to residents on mechanically altered diets. The ED later indicated the CNA’s statement had been taken over the phone and maintained that no written statement had been provided, resulting in incomplete documentation of the abuse investigation in violation of facility policy and state regulation 410 IAC 16.3.1-28(d).
Failure to Ensure Adequate Intermittent Catheter Supply for Self-Catheterizing Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure an adequate supply of urinary catheters was available for a resident who performed intermittent self-catheterization. The resident had diagnoses including paraplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, with a care plan noting risk for infection related to neurogenic bladder and the need for intermittent self-catheterization. A physician visit note documented that the resident reported running low on straight catheters, expressed concern about being forced to reuse catheters, and referenced a history of recurrent UTIs with sepsis. The physician emphasized the importance of sterile, single-use technique and ordered 16F straight catheters for intermittent catheterization. Despite this order and plan, the resident reported ongoing problems obtaining sufficient catheter supplies and interruptions in his catheterization schedule. He stated he was supposed to catheterize every 4–6 hours, understood the plan, and was motivated to adhere to it, but indicated that on the survey day he had been asking since the morning for catheters and had not emptied his bladder since the previous night. He reported that staff were only giving him four catheters for the day instead of at least five as he had been told by the medical provider, and that he sometimes had to reuse catheters at night when staff either did not know where supplies were or reported that supplies were gone. During an interview, he showed his bedside drawer, which contained only three new packaged catheters, which he indicated was all he would receive for the day. Staff interviews and observations further demonstrated gaps in ensuring adequate catheter availability. The nurse practitioner confirmed the resident should receive enough catheters to empty his bladder at least every 4–6 hours and as needed, depending on fluid intake. The QMA responsible for ordering catheters stated she had previously given the resident nearly a full box of 20 catheters over a weekend and believed he was to catheterize every 8 hours; she was unaware that the frequency had changed to every 4–6 hours because nursing staff had not updated her. At the time of observation, there was a box with nineteen 16F catheters for the resident in the supply room, and evening and night staff had access to that room, yet the resident still had only a limited number of catheters at bedside. The nurse consultant acknowledged that the facility did not have a policy for self-catheterization that addressed the availability of supplies.
Failure to Document and Monitor Behavioral Symptoms for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to document and monitor behavioral health symptoms as ordered and care planned for two residents with identified behavioral health needs. Resident D had diagnoses including dementia and bipolar disorder, with a physician’s order dated 4/24/25 directing staff to monitor each shift for specific behaviors such as delusions, hallucinations, tearfulness, crying, verbal expressions of sadness, anger, yelling, cursing, insomnia, anxiety, skin picking, and physical aggression. A quarterly MDS dated 1/9/26 showed moderately impaired cognition and no behaviors during the assessment period, while a care plan revised on 1/21/26 identified multiple behavioral symptoms and directed staff to evaluate behavioral symptoms and intervene when inappropriate behavior was observed. Despite this, the February 2026 MAR indicated no behaviors for the month, and the clinical record lacked a behavior note addressing a resident‑to‑resident bodily contact incident in which Resident D struck another resident. On 2/24/26, an incident report in the facility’s investigation file documented that Resident D made contact with another resident’s head using an open hand, with no injuries reported. The Social Services Director stated that Resident D was not normally aggressive and that when a resident exhibits new behaviors, the nurse should document the behavior in the clinical record using a behavior progress note so it can be reviewed in the morning meeting. The Interdisciplinary Team discussed the incident but did not identify a root cause, and there were no new care plans or interventions added to Resident D’s behavior care plan following the event. LPN 12, who separated the residents, reported that another resident had witnessed the incident, that Resident D did not deny hitting the other resident, and that Resident D stated the other resident would not be quiet, which LPN 12 assumed was the reason for the behavior. The facility also failed to document and track behaviors for Resident B, who had a diagnosis including a personality disorder and was cognitively intact per a quarterly MDS dated 12/16/25. A physician’s order dated 8/12/25 required staff to monitor and track a range of behaviors, including calling emergency services, false accusations/beliefs, anxiety, tearfulness, insomnia, refusal of care, verbal aggression, throwing objects, OCD behaviors, crying, verbal expressions of sadness, racial slurs, self‑isolation, anger, yelling, and cursing, and to implement interventions such as redirection, snacks, fluids, diversionary activities, toileting, change of environment, pain assessment, rest, and comfort. The March 2026 MAR/TAR indicated no behaviors as of 3/11/26; however, during an observation and subsequent interview, Resident B was curt, then later screamed and yelled at an LPN about medication, and the LPN was unsure why the resident was upset. Resident B’s clinical record lacked documentation of this behavior and lacked any documented interventions implemented at that time, despite facility policy stating that nursing monitors for target behaviors daily and documents them, and that nurses should document behaviors on the MAR to trigger a progress note.
Food Storage and Kitchen Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure outdated food items were discarded timely, open food items were properly sealed, and the kitchen and kitchen equipment were clean. During observation with the Dietary Manager, the walk-in refrigerator contained a silver pan of gelatin dated 11/30/25 and a package of sliced cheese that was not sealed. The Dietary Manager stated the gelatin should be discarded and the cheese should have been wrapped completely and would be discarded. At that time, the kitchen floor had a film and did not appear to be clean. Later observations showed the kitchen floor still had a dirty film and did not appear to have been mopped. In the second-floor kitchenette, the inside of the double-door refrigerator had dried food substances on the sides of the floor and a piece of fuzz stuck to the bottom of the interior refrigerator door. The bottom shelf of the steam table had a white film and dark, rust-looking spots, and a tray of white souffle cups on the prep table included one cup with dried-on food inside. Dietary staff stated the souffle cup needed to be washed again, and the Dietary Manager stated the kitchen floor needed to be mopped daily, the kitchenette refrigerator floor needed to be cleaned, and the steam table was older and needed to be cleaned.
Failure to Stop Unnecessary Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely discontinue an antipsychotic medication as recommended by pharmacy and the medical provider for Resident 7, whose diagnoses included dementia. A physician order dated 9/15/25 directed risperidone 0.25 mg at night for agitation, and a November 2025 pharmacy recommendation stated the medical provider needed to justify the use of risperidone 0.25 mg at bedtime for agitation. On 12/4/25, the medical provider documented that the resident did not have an appropriate diagnosis to support risperidone 0.25 mg at hs and that it was appropriate to discontinue the medication, with staff to monitor for worsening symptoms. However, the December 2025 MAR showed the resident continued to receive risperidone nightly on 12/4/25 through 12/10/25 after the discontinuation was documented. During an interview on 12/11/25, the Nurse Consultant stated the medication should have been stopped and that it was missed.
Missing Transfer Form for Hospital Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a transfer form was sent with a resident who was transferred to an acute care hospital. Resident 2 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and a history of falling. The resident's representative stated the resident had been hospitalized for low blood sugar at the beginning of October. The resident's medical record did not include a transfer form for the discharge to the hospital. Hospital records showed the resident was brought in by EMS and admitted with altered mental status. The DON stated the resident was discharged to the hospital by EMS on 9/25/25 and he was unable to locate the discharge transfer form staff had completed for that resident. The facility's transfer and discharge policy stated that for an emergency transfer, staff were to complete the Resident Transfer form and send the original transfer form and portions of the health record with the resident.
Care plans were not updated to reflect discharge wishes and meetings were not held timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and updated timely and that they accurately reflected resident wishes regarding discharge. For Resident 4, who had diabetes and polyneuropathy and was cognitively intact, the record showed conflicting discharge preferences: a discharge care plan indicated the resident wanted to discharge home, while a progress note documented that the resident wished to stay in the facility and not discharge to the community. For Resident 37, who had malnutrition and hypertension and was not cognitively intact, the discharge care plan stated the resident would stay long term, but the family member reported wanting discharge to assisted living and said they had been working with someone regarding insurance and discharge. The administration stated it was the Social Service Designee’s responsibility to revise and update discharge planning care plans. The facility also did not hold care plan meetings timely for Resident 36 and Resident 20. Resident 36 had dementia and dysphagia and was severely cognitively impaired; the family member stated she had not attended a care plan meeting since July 2025, and the last documented care plan meeting was held on 7/3/25. Resident 20 had hypertension and diabetes and was cognitively intact; the resident stated he did not recall ever having a care plan meeting, and the last documented care plan meeting was held on 6/24/25. The facility policy stated comprehensive care plans were to be reviewed and updated every quarter at a minimum, and that the Social Services Director or designee would notify the resident’s responsible party of the scheduled care plan conference.
Failure to Implement Optometry Eye Drop Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the optometry plan of care was implemented for Resident 17, who had glaucoma and severely impaired vision. An Eye Care Chart Note dated 4/11/25 documented blurred vision in both eyes and a plan to treat open-angle glaucoma with brimonidine 0.1%/dorzolamide 2% eye drops twice daily and latanoprost 0.0005% eye drops at bedtime. However, the clinical record did not contain an order for latanoprost, and the physician's order dated 4/26/25 only listed brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% twice daily for glaucoma. Resident 17 told surveyors she had not received eye drops in a very long time and did not know why she was not receiving them. During observation on 12/10/25, she did not receive eye drops when her morning medications were administered. Although the November and December MAR indicated brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% had been given daily, the Pharmacy Technician stated on 12/11/25 that the medication had not been refilled since April 2025. The DON stated the latanoprost eye drops had not been transcribed from the April eye care visit note and that Resident 17 should have received her eye drops as ordered by the optometrist.
Failure to Maintain Availability of PRN Pain Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident with cancer and pneumonia by not ensuring pain medication was available and by not implementing other pain relief interventions as ordered. The resident’s admission MDS indicated he was cognitively intact, frequently had pain, used PRN pain medication, and had pain severity up to 9/10. His pain care plan identified him as at risk for pain and discomfort and directed staff to administer pain medications as ordered and use non-pharmacological pain relief. During observation and interview, the resident was lying in bed, rubbing his right thigh frequently, and showing facial grimacing while reporting pain at 8/10. He stated he could not get pain medicine because the facility had run out, and said he had asked for his narcotic pain medicine earlier that morning for pain rated 7.5/10. An LPN confirmed the resident was out of pain medicine and said it was coming from the pharmacy that day, then gave Tylenol. The MAR showed the resident’s last narcotic pain medication dose was the prior evening, the order was for narcotic pain medicine every four hours as needed, and the reorder request was not transmitted until later that day. The DON stated narcotics should be reordered before residents run out, at least when they have a day of medication left.
Failure to Provide Ordered Seizure Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the availability of a resident’s seizure medication, lacosamide 100 mg twice daily, for Resident 58, who had diagnoses including anoxic brain injury, tracheostomy, and epilepsy. The physician’s order was dated 12/9/25, but the December 2025 MAR showed multiple scheduled doses as not available to be administered on 12/10, 12/11, 12/12, 12/13, 12/14, 12/15, and 12/16, with only a few doses documented as administered as ordered. Nursing progress notes documented repeated contact with the pharmacy and medical provider because a prescription was needed for the medication, and the pharmacy reported it had not received a full correct prescription. On 12/16/25, the medication supply was not found in the medication cart, and the DON stated the resident had not received any doses of lacosamide twice a day since it was ordered on admission. The DON also stated the MAR was incorrectly documented, the pharmacy still needed a prescription, and the resident’s lacosamide was placed on hold by the provider until the medication arrived.
Missed Pharmacy Recommendations to Discontinue Unused PRN Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely address pharmacy recommendations to discontinue an unused PRN medication for Resident 5, whose diagnoses included COPD. A physician’s order dated 7/17/25 directed hyoscyamine sulfate 0.125 mg every 2 hours PRN. In October 2025, the pharmacy recommended discontinuing unused PRN medications because the hyoscyamine sulfate had not been used in the prior 60 days, and the medical provider agreed to discontinue it on 10/30/25; however, the November 2025 MAR still showed the medication as available for administration every 2 hours PRN. A second pharmacy recommendation in November 2025 again advised discontinuation for the same reason, and the medical provider agreed on 12/9/25, yet the December 2025 MAR still listed the medication as available. The DON stated on 12/11/25 that the October and November pharmacy recommendations to discontinue the PRN hyoscyamine sulfate had not been discontinued in error and were missed.
Mechanical Soft Diets and Thickened Liquids Not Provided as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received mechanically altered diets as ordered by the physician for three residents observed at meal service. Resident 31 had a diagnosis that included dementia and a physician order for a mechanical soft, ground meat texture diet. Resident 25 had a diagnosis that included dysphagia and a physician order for a mechanical soft, ground meat texture diet. Resident 36 had a diagnosis that included dysphagia and a physician order for a mechanical soft, chopped meat texture diet with nectar thick liquids. During lunch service in the second floor dining room, Resident 31, Resident 25, and Resident 36 were served meatloaf, whole kernel corn, and mashed potatoes, although their meal tickets indicated mechanical soft diets. The Dietary Manager stated that residents on mechanical soft diets should have received cream corn instead of whole kernel corn. Later, Resident 36 was observed in the second floor dining room with a cup of hot chocolate, and when she drank it, she began to cough. The Therapy Coordinator stated that Resident 36 was to receive nectar thick liquids, and an Activity Assistant stated the hot chocolate had not been thickened and was unsure whether Resident 36's liquids needed to be thickened.
Inaccurate Medication and Clinical Record Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident medical records were accurately documented for medication administration and related care. For a resident with anoxic brain injury, tracheostomy, and epilepsy, the record showed physician-ordered lacosamide 100 mg twice daily, but the MAR documented doses as administered on three occasions even though the DON stated the resident had not received any doses of lacosamide since it was ordered. This created a discrepancy between the documented medication administration and what actually occurred. The facility also documented eye drops as given for a resident with glaucoma and impaired cognition and vision, even though the resident stated she had not received eye drops in a long time and was observed receiving morning medications without the eye drops being administered. Pharmacy staff reported no refill of the brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution had been sent to the facility since April 2025, and the DON stated the drops should not have been signed off as given if the resident did not receive them. In a separate record review, a resident with cancer and pneumonia was observed having difficulty swallowing pills; although an order allowed medications to be crushed as needed, the nurse administered pills whole in pudding, the resident reported the pills felt stuck in his throat, and the nursing note did not accurately reflect the resident’s condition. The nurse later stated she had told the next shift but did not report the swallowing concern to the physician or speech therapy.
Infection Control Lapses During Catheter Care and Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an infection prevention and control program as evidenced by repeated observations of an indwelling urinary catheter bag for Resident 8 contacting the floor. Resident 8’s clinical record showed diagnoses including stroke, a Quarterly MDS dated 11/11/2025 indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and frequently incontinent of bladder, and a urological care plan dated 11/12/2025 noted uropathy with catheter use. During observations on 12/09/2025, 12/10/2025, and 12/15/2025, the catheter bag was noted to be touching the floor. The DON stated that indwelling urinary catheter bags should not contact the floor. The facility also failed to follow infection control practices during medication administration for Resident 1, whose diagnosis included diabetes. During an observed blood sugar check and insulin administration, an LPN performed hand hygiene before reopening the medication cart, then entered the resident’s room and donned gloves without performing hand hygiene first. After leaving the room, the LPN returned to the medication cart, obtained an insulin pen, removed its lid, and attached a needle without cleansing the hub of the insulin pen with alcohol first. The LPN stated she normally performed hand hygiene before donning gloves and that the insulin pen hub should have been cleaned with alcohol before attaching the needle.
Failure to Administer Antipsychotic Medication and Notify Provider for Resident with Behavioral Health Needs
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia, dementia, and depression was readmitted to the facility following a psychiatric hospitalization, with orders to receive Uzedy, an atypical antipsychotic, via subcutaneous injection every 30 days. The medication was not administered as ordered on the scheduled date, and the medication administration record (MAR) indicated it was not given, with a note stating it was unavailable. However, pharmacy records and direct observation confirmed that the medication was present in the facility at the time it was due. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no documentation that the physician or nurse practitioner was notified of the missed dose, as required by facility policy. Interviews with nursing staff revealed inconsistent practices regarding medication administration and documentation. One LPN reported not seeing the medication in the cart and did not prepare it in advance, assuming the resident would refuse, and could not confirm if the nurse practitioner was notified of the missed dose. The nurse practitioner stated she was not informed about the missed injection and emphasized the importance of the medication for the resident's stabilization, especially given his refusal of oral medications. The MAR also showed frequent refusals of oral Depakote, with varying documentation of interventions used to encourage acceptance, such as education, encouragement, and attempts to offer medication with food, though not all interventions were consistently documented or reflected in the care plan. The resident's care plans addressing refusal of care and medication did not include all effective interventions known to staff, such as offering snacks or crushing medications with food, despite these being recognized strategies by staff and discussed in interviews. The facility's policies required individualized care planning and prompt notification of the physician when medications were refused or missed, but these procedures were not fully implemented. The lack of administration of the antipsychotic medication, failure to notify the provider, and incomplete care planning and documentation for medication refusals led to the identified deficiency.
Failure to Timely Implement and Maintain Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with multiple psychiatric diagnoses, including borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, experienced a fall while attempting to transfer from a wheelchair to bed. The resident was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of two or more falls since the last MDS assessment. The care plan included interventions such as anti-roll backs for the wheelchair and the use of nonskid footwear, but these interventions were not consistently implemented. On the day of observation, the resident was found sitting in a wheelchair without anti-roll backs, and was wearing fluffy socks instead of nonskid socks while transferring herself from the wheelchair to the bed. The resident expressed confusion and frustration about her wheelchair being switched out by staff for maintenance to apply anti-roll backs, and refused assistance from the ADON during the transfer. The lack of timely implementation of fall interventions and failure to ensure interventions were in place contributed to the deficiency.
Failure to Provide and Administer Ordered Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that prescribed medications, including narcotic and IV antibiotics, were administered as ordered and were readily available for use for two residents. One resident with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer, paraplegia, and muscle spasm did not receive multiple scheduled doses of IV ceftolozane-tazobactam due to the medication being unavailable or on hold, as documented in progress notes and the electronic medication administration record (EMAR). Additionally, this resident did not receive several scheduled doses of pregabalin for neuropathy pain because the medication was not available, with progress notes indicating repeated notifications to the pharmacy and delayed receipt of the medication. Another resident with multiple psychiatric diagnoses, including borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, experienced lapses in the administration of clonazepam, as evidenced by missing controlled drug record forms for several periods and instances where administration was not signed off. The facility's policy required contacting the pharmacy or supervisor if a medication was ordered but not present, but this was not consistently followed, resulting in missed doses for both residents.
Delayed Call Light Response and Inappropriate Incontinence Care Offerings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor residents' rights to dignity and timely assistance, as evidenced by delayed responses to call lights and inappropriate offers of incontinence briefs. One resident, who was cognitively intact and had resided in the facility for over five years, reported that it typically took a minimum of 30 minutes for staff to respond to her call light, with delays occurring on all shifts, especially at night. Another resident's family member reported that the resident, who was non-ambulatory, cognitively intact, and required substantial assistance for toileting, experienced similar delays, with call lights going unanswered for 20 to 30 minutes. On one occasion, the family member had to seek staff assistance directly, and even after intervention, the resident continued to wait for help. Additionally, the same resident and her family reported that staff repeatedly offered her an incontinence brief despite their explicit refusals, which they found humiliating, particularly given the resident's young age. The facility's policies required prompt response to call lights and emphasized respect for resident dignity and preferences, including changing residents upon discovery of incontinence and allowing them to wear what they choose. However, these policies were not consistently followed, resulting in residents experiencing undignified care and delayed assistance.
Failure to Timely Notify Physician and Family of Significant Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely notification of significant changes in condition to the attending physician and family for two residents. In the first case, a resident with a history of multiple strokes, severe cognitive impairment, and requiring enteral feedings experienced a significant weight loss of over 10% in less than one month. Despite weekly interdisciplinary team reviews and documentation of weights, there was no evidence that the physician or family were notified of this significant weight loss at the time it occurred. Documentation inconsistencies were noted, and the significant weight loss was not clearly identified or communicated until much later, with no record of timely notification to the responsible parties. In the second case, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, tracheostomy, and feeding tube developed a new open area (laceration) on the neck, likely related to trach collar elastic. The open area was identified during a skin check, and while documentation indicated the physician and responsible party were updated, there was no clear record of when the wound was first identified, what immediate treatment was provided, or when notifications occurred. The family member only became aware of the wound during a radiology appointment, and there was a lack of documentation regarding the initial discovery and notification process. The facility's policy requires prompt notification of changes in resident condition to the physician and responsible party to ensure appropriate care and resident rights. In both cases, the documentation failed to demonstrate that timely notifications were made as required by facility policy and regulatory standards.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Bathing and Hygiene Needs
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing the bathing and hygiene care needs for one resident. The resident, who had diagnoses including pneumonia, cirrhosis of the liver, gait and mobility abnormalities, cognitive communication deficit, and general muscle weakness, was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired and required moderate staff assistance for bathing and supervision for hygiene care. Despite these needs, a comprehensive care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically bathing and hygiene, was not found in the resident's clinical record. Interviews with facility staff confirmed the absence of a care plan for the resident's ADLs. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged overlooking the development of a care plan based on the admission MDS and baseline care plan. The facility's policy requires a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission and a comprehensive care plan to follow, but this process was not completed for the resident in question. A family member also reported that the resident received very few showers during their stay.
Failure to Provide Adequate Bathing and Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple medical conditions, including pneumonia, cirrhosis, mobility issues, cognitive impairment, and muscle weakness, did not receive adequate bathing and hygiene care as required. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated a need for moderate staff assistance with bathing or showering and supervision for hygiene care, with a strong preference for choosing the manner of bathing. Despite a scheduled bathing routine, records showed that over a 25-day period, the resident received only three bed baths, one partial bath, and no showers. In the following month, the resident received three partial baths and one shower over 30 days. The lack of consistent bathing was confirmed by a family member, who reported that the resident received very few showers during their stay. Further review revealed that the MDS Coordinator failed to develop a care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs) based on the admission MDS and baseline care plan. Additionally, a grievance form submitted by the resident regarding the shower schedule was documented, and although the facility indicated that the concern was addressed and a shower was provided, the bathing documentation did not reflect that any bathing occurred on the date in question. These findings demonstrate a failure to provide necessary care and assistance for bathing and hygiene to a resident unable to perform these activities independently.
Failure to Provide Continuous Enteral Feeding and Timely Response to Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of multiple strokes resulting in significant paralysis and an inability to swallow safely required continuous enteral (gastric) feedings via a feeding tube. On one occasion, the resident's feeding ran out during the night and was not resumed for several hours because the feeding solution was locked in an office and inaccessible to nursing staff. The feeding was not restarted until the morning, resulting in an interruption of the prescribed continuous nutrition. The resident's clinical record showed a significant weight loss of more than 10% in less than one month, dropping from 236.0 pounds to 205.3 pounds. Despite this substantial weight loss, interdisciplinary team notations failed to identify or address the weight loss in a timely manner. Documentation did not reflect that the attending physician or the resident's family had been notified of the significant weight loss on the relevant dates. Facility policies required prompt notification of changes in a resident's condition, including significant weight loss, to the physician and responsible party. However, the records and interviews confirmed that such notifications and timely interventions were not conducted as required. Additionally, the medication administration and nursing progress notes did not document the interruption in enteral feeding, further indicating a lack of appropriate monitoring and response to the resident's nutritional needs.
Failure to Document Identification and Notification of New Wound
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly document the identification and management of a newly discovered open area on a resident with a tracheostomy. The resident, who was severely cognitively impaired, nonverbal, nonambulatory, and dependent on staff for all care, was found to have a new laceration on the left side of the neck. The clinical record included a Weekly Skin Check and a Weekly Wound Event form, both dated the same morning, which noted the wound's size, drainage, and treatment with steri strips. However, there was no documentation indicating when the open area was first identified, what initial treatment was provided before the skin check, or any notifications to the attending physician, family, or facility administration regarding the new wound and the resident's departure for a radiology appointment. Interviews revealed that the family was not informed of any skin concerns prior to discovering the wound at a radiology appointment, and the nurse who initially identified the wound did not document the event. The DON confirmed being notified by the night shift nurse about the wound but found no documentation from that nurse, only from the wound nurse who assessed the area later. The facility also lacked a specific policy on documentation, as confirmed by the Corporate Nurse. These documentation gaps resulted in incomplete records regarding the resident's change in condition and communication with responsible parties.
Failure to Maintain Safe Food Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain safe food temperatures during meal service, potentially affecting 48 of 49 residents. During an observation of the lunch service in the main kitchen, it was noted that the steam table contained mixed vegetables and fish filets at temperatures of 121.8 degrees Fahrenheit and 107 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. These temperatures were below the required minimum of 135 degrees Fahrenheit, as indicated by Facility staff. Additionally, in the upstairs kitchenette, French fries were observed on the steam table at a temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, also below the safe holding temperature. The facility's Food Safety Handout, dated 9/28/2020, specifies that hot foods should be held at temperatures between 135 degrees Fahrenheit and 170 degrees Fahrenheit.
Failure to Maintain Required RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the required Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, which had the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third quarter of the 2024 Federal Fiscal Year revealed that there was no RN coverage on specific dates, including 4/20/24 and 4/21/24. Interviews with the Staffing Coordinator and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the absence of RN coverage on these dates, as the facility's RN weekend option nurse did not work, and no agency nursing staff had been used since 4/1/24. Additionally, the facility lacked a policy regarding RN coverage, as indicated by the Nurse Consultant during an interview.
Medication and Care Plan Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medications and collect urine samples as ordered, impacting several residents. Resident 42, who was admitted with a healing leg fracture, did not have a timely follow-up orthopedic appointment scheduled. Despite a physician's note indicating the need for an orthopedic follow-up, the appointment was only made after a delay, as observed during an interview with LPN 4. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the appointment should have been scheduled sooner. Resident 30, who relies on a gastric tube for nutrition, did not have his weight monitored as recommended by the registered dietician. Despite a significant weight gain noted in August, there was no recorded weight for September, and weekly weights were not completed as requested. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with a Nurse Consultant, who noted that the facility's SWAT Program Meeting Guidance was not followed. Additionally, Resident 11's urine sample was not collected as ordered, and Resident 29 did not receive prescribed medications for diabetes and hypertension on multiple occasions. The Medication Administration Record showed several instances where insulin and clonidine were not administered as ordered, and there was no documentation to justify withholding these medications. Resident 95 also did not have a urine sample collected as ordered for a lab test. These deficiencies highlight a pattern of non-compliance with physician orders and care plans, as confirmed by interviews with the Nurse Consultant.
Lack of COVID-19 Vaccination Documentation for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the medical records of five residents included documentation indicating that the residents or their representatives were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine. Additionally, there was no documentation on whether the COVID-19 vaccine was administered to these residents or if they did not receive the vaccine due to medical contraindications or refusal. The residents involved were identified as Residents 11, 18, 20, 24, and 30, and their clinical records were reviewed on October 3, 2024. During an interview with the Nurse Consultant on October 4, 2024, it was confirmed that there was no verification that the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination was offered, refused, medically contraindicated, or that education regarding the vaccination was provided to the residents in question. The facility's policy, provided by the Nurse Consultant, emphasized the importance of remaining up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations and offering resources and counseling, but it did not reference the need for documentation in the residents' clinical records regarding education or vaccination status.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Meal Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity during meal assistance. Resident 2, who has a diagnosis of dementia and cognitive impairment as indicated in a Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, required assistance with eating according to her Activities of Daily Living care plan. During an observation in the dining room, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was seen standing while assisting Resident 2 with her meal, rather than sitting, which is contrary to the facility's resident rights policy. This policy emphasizes treating residents with respect and dignity, including providing care in a manner that enhances their quality of life. The Nurse Consultant confirmed that the CNA should have been sitting while assisting the resident, aligning with the policy to ensure a dignified existence for residents.
Failure to Address Resident Grievance Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address a resident's grievance in a timely manner, as evidenced by the case of a resident who was cognitively intact and had a history of stroke. The resident had been storing a Tupperware container with a teapot and tea bags in the dining room for years. However, he was recently informed that he could no longer store it there and had to transport it back and forth from his room to the dining room for each meal. This change made it difficult for him, as he had to revert to using a wheelchair instead of crutches to carry the container, and he was not provided with a reason for this new restriction. The Activities Director confirmed the resident's dissatisfaction with the new storage rule and acknowledged that a grievance form was not filled out regarding the resident's concern. The facility's grievance policy outlines a process for addressing resident concerns, including completing a form, discussing it in a CQI meeting, and ensuring the resident is satisfied with the resolution. However, in this case, the process was not followed, as the resident's grievance was not documented or addressed according to the facility's policy.
Inaccurate RN Staffing Data Submission to CMS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit accurate direct care staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding the correct category of work for a Registered Nurse (RN) for all 49 residents. The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third quarter of the 2024 Federal Fiscal Year showed no RN coverage on several dates, despite evidence from the Daily Nursing Schedule and time sheets indicating RN coverage on those dates. The Staffing Coordinator, who has been in the role for almost three years, indicated that RN 9, the weekend option nurse, worked on the dates in question but the system may not have been updated to reflect RN 9's title change to RN after obtaining her license in March 2024. The facility lacked a policy regarding PBJ data submission, as confirmed by the Nurse Consultant.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Bed Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four residents, leading to a deficiency in the accuracy of resident assessments. Resident 1, diagnosed with paraplegia, had an Admission MDS assessment indicating daily use of bed rails as a restraint. Resident 12, with dementia, had a Quarterly MDS assessment also indicating daily use of bed rails as a restraint. Resident 22, diagnosed with hypertension, had a Quarterly MDS assessment showing daily use of bed rails as a resident. Resident 42, with depression, had an Admission MDS assessment indicating daily use of bed rails as a restraint. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the Regional MDS Coordinator revealed that the MDS assessments were inaccurately coded, as the bed rails were used for bed mobility, not as restraints. The facility used the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual as their policy.
Failure to Accurately Complete MDS Assessment for Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was correctly completed for a resident, specifically regarding falls. Resident B, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including encephalopathy, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cognitive function issues, had an MDS assessment dated 10-9-23. This assessment incorrectly indicated that the resident had no falls from the time of admission through the assessment reference date. However, the clinical record showed that Resident B had sustained two falls on 10-8-23, one at 2:00 a.m. and another at 5:30 p.m. Interviews revealed that during the time of the MDS assessment, the regular MDS staff was on medical leave, and a corporate MDS person was filling in. Despite this, it appeared that the regular MDS staff conducted the assessment. The Executive Director confirmed that the facility does not have a specific policy for MDS assessments but follows the most current Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. The manual requires a thorough review of all available sources for any falls during the look-back period, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,000 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Indianapolis
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearvista Lake Health Campus | 0 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Castleton Health Care Center | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 36 | 0 |
| Allisonville Meadows | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Allison Pointe Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Hamilton Trace Of Fishers | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Waters Of Castleton Skilled Nursing Facility, The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.