Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Timely Implement and Maintain Fall Interventions

Indianapolis, Indiana Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with multiple psychiatric diagnoses, including borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, experienced a fall while attempting to transfer from a wheelchair to bed. The resident was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of two or more falls since the last MDS assessment. The care plan included interventions such as anti-roll backs for the wheelchair and the use of nonskid footwear, but these interventions were not consistently implemented. On the day of observation, the resident was found sitting in a wheelchair without anti-roll backs, and was wearing fluffy socks instead of nonskid socks while transferring herself from the wheelchair to the bed. The resident expressed confusion and frustration about her wheelchair being switched out by staff for maintenance to apply anti-roll backs, and refused assistance from the ADON during the transfer. The lack of timely implementation of fall interventions and failure to ensure interventions were in place contributed to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙