Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Vermillion Convalescent Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
An RN failed to perform hand hygiene and clean shared equipment during a medication pass for multiple residents, including accu-checks, blood pressure checks, pulse oximeter use, and medication/insulin administration. The RN also touched a dropped pill with bare hands and reused gloves from one resident’s bedside table for another resident. In addition, a CNA and an LPN did not follow EBP for two residents who had orders for EBP, as gown use was omitted during a bed bath and g-tube medication administration.
A facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications for one resident with severe dementia, agitation, and anxiety, where quetiapine was ordered but not included on the consent form signed for melatonin. Another resident with Alzheimer's disease, chronic respiratory failure, and metabolic encephalopathy received lorazepam and olanzapine for anxiety and agitation, but the record lacked documentation that the family was notified or consented to the psychotropic medication use.
Call lights were not kept within reach for two residents. One resident with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia was observed with the call light missing or placed out of reach, and the care plan did not document call light use or ability. Another resident with CVA, hemiplegia, and moderate cognitive impairment had the call light lying on the bed or in a recliner out of reach, even though he stated he was supposed to use it for assistance.
Failure to Provide and Document Scheduled Showers: A resident who was cognitively intact and needed moderate assistance with showers reported that staff often forgot about her and that she was not receiving showers as scheduled. Her care plan called for bathing choices and showers per schedule, but shower records showed only a few documented showers over several months, with no documentation of showers for part of the review period. An LPN said the resident usually did not refuse showers, and the RNC could not verify that she had received the ordered frequency of showers.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical and Verbal Abuse: A CNA was observed pulling a resident's arm off the side rail, pushing it into his stomach, and using profanity while the resident cried out in pain. The resident had Alzheimer's disease, chronic respiratory failure, metabolic encephalopathy, limited cognition, and was rarely able to communicate verbally. Two CNAs intervened and later described the resident as non-aggressive and in need of calm communication due to blindness and severe impairment.
Failure to immediately notify the Administrator of an abuse allegation. A CNA witness reported another CNA pulling a resident’s arm off the side rail, pushing it into the resident’s stomach, and using profanity while the resident, who had Alzheimer’s disease and was rarely able to communicate verbally, sustained a skin tear. The witness notified the nurse, but the Administrator was not immediately informed and learned of the allegation later through the SSD.
Failure to provide and document fingernail care for a resident with CVA, hemiplegia, and moderate cognitive impairment. The resident’s fingernails were repeatedly observed to be long, jagged, and dirty on the right hand, while progress notes and shower sheets did not show that nail care was offered, provided, or refused. Staff stated nail care should be done as needed or with showers, and the DON said she was unsure how often it should occur.
A resident with a history of pressure ulcers, severe cognitive impairment, and dependence for ADLs developed a new coccyx wound that progressed to an unstageable sacral ulcer with redness, pain, foul drainage, and later osteomyelitis. The record lacked documentation that the contracted wound NP was notified of the physician-ordered antibiotics, x-ray results, or wound culture status, and an LPN was observed changing coccyx and hip dressings without proper hand hygiene between glove changes and while handling supplies bare handed.
Urinary Catheter Bag and Tubing Contacted the Floor: A resident with a Foley catheter, neurogenic bladder, severe cognitive deficit, and a history of UTI had the catheter bag and tubing observed in contact with the floor during two separate observations. The care plan directed staff to position the catheter tubing and bag to avoid floor contact, and both a CNA and the DON stated the bag or tubing should not touch the floor.
An opened vial of Aplisol was found in the south med room refrigerator with an opened date well beyond the 30-day use period. An LPN was unsure how long the medication could be used after opening, and the RN consultant confirmed the vial should have been discarded after 30 days per the facility’s policy.
Failure to follow the ASP protocol for a resident receiving long-term Macrobid prophylaxis for recurrent UTIs. The record lacked a care plan for prophylactic antibiotic use, recent UA lab work, documentation of a physician assessment for the need for ongoing antibiotic therapy, and evidence that the resident and/or responsible party were educated about long-term antibiotic use. The DON stated the resident had been on the prophylactic antibiotic since before admission, and the facility used McGreer’s criteria for infection surveillance.
A resident's dignity was compromised when a student nurse aide transported them in an open shower chair with their buttocks exposed. The resident, who required maximum assistance due to cognitive deficits, was only partially covered, contrary to facility policy on respect and dignity. An LPN confirmed the resident should have been fully covered.
A resident with epilepsy was transferred to the hospital after a seizure, but the facility failed to document physician and family notifications. The SBAR form was incomplete, and the nurse's note lacked necessary documentation, as confirmed by staff interviews.
A facility failed to maintain proper hygiene for a resident's indwelling urinary catheter, as the catheter bag and tubing were observed in contact with the floor multiple times. The resident, who had a history of urinary issues and a recent UTI, required extensive assistance and had an indwelling catheter. Despite the facility's policy against allowing catheter bags to touch the floor, this guideline was not followed, as confirmed by the ADON.
The facility failed to properly label and store medications, as observed in two medication carts and one treatment cart. Insulin pens and vials for three residents lacked opening dates, and numerous ointments and topical medications were found loose and unlabeled. Interviews with staff confirmed the need for proper dating and storage, which was not followed according to facility policies.
A facility failed to document the administration of medications for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including overactive bladder and dementia. Despite physician's orders for several medications, the MAR lacked documentation for the evening shift on a specific date. The Regional Clinical Nurse confirmed the expectation for documentation, and the facility's policy required recording doses after administration.
Infection Control and Enhanced Barrier Precautions Not Followed During Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and proper infection control practices were followed during a medication pass for five residents. During observation, an RN picked up a pill that had fallen onto the medication cart with bare hands and placed it into a medication cup. The RN then performed accu-checks, blood pressure checks, pulse oximeter use, and medication administration for Residents 33, 36, 48, 28, and 62 without consistently performing hand hygiene before or after resident contact or between resident medication administrations. The RN also did not clean the pulse oximeter or wrist blood pressure cuff between uses, and gloves taken from one resident’s bedside table were later used for another resident. Resident 33 was observed receiving an accu-check and later medication and insulin administration without hand hygiene before or after the procedures. Resident 36 had a pulse oximeter applied and medication administered without hand hygiene or cleaning of the equipment. Resident 48 had a wrist blood pressure check and medication administration without hand hygiene or cleaning of the wrist cuff. Resident 28 received an accu-check, pulse oximeter use, medication, and insulin administration while the RN wore gloves previously removed from another resident’s bedside table, and no hand hygiene or equipment cleaning was observed. Resident 62 also had a blood pressure check with the wrist cuff without cleaning the equipment before or after use. The facility also failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for two residents. Resident 33 had a physician’s order for EBP and diagnoses including hidradenitis suppurativa and a history of Proteus mirabilis; during observation, a CNA provided a bed bath and washed the resident’s hair while wearing gloves but no gown, despite a sign indicating EBP was required. Resident 10 also had a physician’s order for EBP, and during observed g-tube medication administration, an LPN wore gloves but no gown. The DON stated staff should have worn a gown and gloves during bed baths and g-tube medication administration for residents requiring EBP, and the facility policy listed bathing, hygiene, device care or use, and feeding tube care as high-contact activities requiring gown and glove use.
Missing Consent and Family Notification for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure informed consent documents were obtained for psychotropic medications for 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. One resident with diagnoses including unspecified severe dementia with agitation, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and irritability and anger had a significant change MDS showing severe cognitive deficit, behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and use of an antipsychotic medication. The record included an order for quetiapine 25 mg at bedtime, but there was no informed consent form for that medication. A separate consent form signed for melatonin at bedtime did not include consent for quetiapine, and the LPN and DON stated the quetiapine consent should have been completed when the resident returned from the hospital or included with the melatonin consent. Another resident with Alzheimer's disease, chronic respiratory failure, and metabolic encephalopathy had orders for lorazepam as needed for anxiety/agitation related to end-of-life hospice care and olanzapine 5 mg daily. The annual MDS indicated the resident required maximum assistance for all daily care needs and was not cognitively intact. The record showed the resident received two psychotropic medications for anxiety and agitation, but there was no documentation that the family was notified of the psychotropic medication administration. The DON stated the hospice agency notified the family of the medication initiation, but the hospice note provided did not show family notification or consent, and the DON acknowledged it was the facility's responsibility to inform the responsible party and obtain consent for psychotropic medication use.
Call lights not kept within reach of residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 of 24 residents reviewed. Resident 25 was observed sleeping in bed on 8/14/2025 with the call light not within reach and unable to be located. On 8/15/2025, Resident 25 was observed sitting in a recliner, and the call light was attached to the middle of the curtain within the folds of the curtain at the foot of the bed. The resident was unable to answer interview questions. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease and unspecified dementia, and the care plan dated 8/6/2025 noted cognitive loss and dementia with progressive cognitive and communicative deficits. The care plan did not include evidence of call light use or the resident’s ability to use a call light. Resident 23 was observed on 8/13/2025 up in a wheelchair in his room with the call light lying on the bed out of reach, and he stated he was supposed to press the call light if he needed assistance but it had disappeared somewhere. On 8/15/2025, Resident 23 was observed lying in bed with the call light in the recliner about three feet away and covered with linens, out of reach. He stated he was supposed to have the call light but had no idea where it was, and that he would have used it for assistance if he needed it, if he was able to reach it. His record included diagnoses of cerebral infarction and hemiplegia affecting the left side, and a quarterly MDS dated 7/9/25 indicated moderate cognitive impairment, functional limitation in range of motion, and need for assistance with ADLs. The care plan initiated 8/6/25 stated he required assistance to transfer from bed and was able to use the call light to ask for assistance.
Failure to Provide and Document Scheduled Showers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 51 was provided showers as preferred and as scheduled. During an interview, the resident stated that staff often forgot about her and that she did not receive her showers as scheduled; she was unable to recall when her last shower occurred. Her record showed she was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance with showers and toileting, and her care plan directed staff to offer bathing choices and provide showers/baths per schedule and more frequently if requested and as needed. The shower schedule indicated the resident was to receive showers on Tuesday and Saturday evening shift, but the shower documentation did not support that this occurred. Review of shower sheets showed only three showers documented in June 2025, two showers documented in July 2025, and no documented showers through August 15, 2025. An LPN stated the resident usually did not refuse showers and would normally take them when offered, while the RNC was unable to provide documentation that the resident had received two showers per week for the prior three months. The DON stated staff should be documenting when they provide showers.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical and Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical and verbal abuse by a CNA. The resident had a BIMS score of 99 and was rarely able to communicate verbally. His diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic respiratory failure, and metabolic encephalopathy. He required maximum assistance for all daily care needs, had limited cognition, highly impaired vision, decreased communication, and severely impaired cognitive skills. An allegation of abuse was reported after two CNAs observed CNA 11 at the resident's bedside in the same room as his roommate. The report stated CNA 11 pulled the resident's hand off the side rail, pushed the resident's arm into his stomach, spoke abruptly, and used profanity. The other CNAs immediately intervened and prevented further interaction. A skin tear was noted on the resident's right arm, and one CNA who had cared for him the prior evening indicated no skin tear had been present then. Interviews later confirmed the resident was not acting aggressive at the time and was blind, requiring calm communication. One CNA stated she saw CNA 11 rip the resident's arm off the side rail and slam it into his abdomen while yelling and cussing, and the resident was heard saying, 'ouch, that hurts, my arm, my arm.' Another CNA gave a similar account and stated the resident was not resisting care at that time. The facility's abuse policy defined physical abuse as hitting, slapping, or pinching, and verbal abuse as willful disparaging or derogatory language toward residents.
Failure to Immediately Notify Administrator of Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the administrator was notified immediately of an allegation of abuse involving one resident. On 8/16/25, two CNAs reported seeing another CNA at the resident’s bedside pulling the resident’s hand off the side rail, pushing the resident’s arm into his stomach, speaking abruptly, and using profanity. The resident had a skin tear on the right arm, and the resident’s BIMS score of 99 indicated he was rarely able to communicate verbally. The resident’s medical history included Alzheimer’s disease, chronic respiratory failure, and metabolic encephalopathy. Facility records showed the CNA who witnessed the incident reported it to the nurse, and the DON and the resident’s family member were notified. However, the Administrator stated she was not immediately notified of the allegation of abuse and learned of it later through the SSD. The Administrator also stated the CNA involved remained in the building for about one and a half hours after the incident, and the SSD indicated she was notified by a CNA witness and then notified the Administrator, while being unsure whether the Administrator should have been notified first. The facility policy required the witness or informed staff member to immediately notify the charge nurse, and the charge nurse to immediately notify the Administrator and DON.
Failure to Provide and Document Fingernail Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure fingernail care was provided for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for ADLs, Resident 23. On multiple observations from 8/13/25 through 8/18/25, the resident’s fingernails on the right hand were noted to be long, jagged, and with dark debris underneath them. The resident was observed both in a wheelchair and lying in bed during this period, and the condition of the fingernails remained unchanged across observations. Resident 23’s record showed diagnoses including cerebral infarction and left-sided hemiplegia. The quarterly MDS dated 7/9/25 indicated moderate cognitive impairment, functional limitation in range of motion, and the need for partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene, with no indication that the resident refused care. Progress notes from 7/19/25 to 8/18/25 did not document that fingernail care was offered, provided, or refused. Shower sheets showed multiple showers during this time, but they also lacked documentation that fingernail care was offered, provided, or refused. The care plan, initiated on 7/22/25, included nail care as needed, and staff interviews indicated fingernail care should have been done as needed or with showers, with refusals documented if they occurred.
Failure to Communicate Wound Changes and Use Proper Dressing Change Technique
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to communicate effectively with the contracted wound specialist NP when a resident developed a new pressure ulcer and failed to use appropriate infection control techniques during a dressing change for a resident with pressure ulcers. On 8/15/25, an LPN and the DON were observed changing dressings on the resident’s coccyx and right hip. The LPN removed both dressings while wearing the same gloves, changed gloves without performing hand hygiene, cleansed the coccyx wound, changed gloves again without hand hygiene, and later retrieved a dressing from the resident’s dresser bare handed before donning new gloves without hand hygiene. During the dressing change, a foul odor was noted. The resident had a history of pressure ulcers and severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for ADLs, and received pressure ulcer care. The record showed the resident was admitted with a stage 2 coccyx pressure ulcer that later healed, then developed a deep tissue injury to the coccyx on 1/23/25. The physician was notified and treatment was ordered, but the note did not document that the contracted wound company was notified. On 1/24/25, the resident had redness radiating down the right buttock from the wound base and tenderness, and antibiotics were ordered; again, the note lacked documentation that the wound company was notified of the wound changes or antibiotic orders. The contracted wound NP evaluated the resident on 1/29/25 and documented an unstageable coccyx wound with surrounding redness, pain, and concern for possible cellulitis, infection, osteomyelitis, and high risk for sepsis. The NP recommended an x-ray and wound culture and stated that worsening redness, fever, or chills should prompt notification of the medical director and consideration of hospital transfer. Subsequent NP notes on 2/5/25 and 2/12/25 lacked documentation that the NP was informed of the physician-ordered antibiotics, the x-ray results, or whether the wound culture was completed. The resident’s record also lacked documentation that the wound culture was completed or that there was a rationale for not obtaining it after it was recommended. The resident was later transferred to the hospital, where documentation showed a large unstageable sacral pressure ulcer with necrotic tissue and foul odor, requiring debridement and wound vac therapy, and the discharge diagnosis was sacral wound with osteomyelitis.
Urinary Catheter Bag and Tubing Contacted the Floor
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was kept from touching the floor for one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. During an observation on 8/13/25, the resident was sitting in a wheelchair in the activity room and the catheter bag, covered with a cloth covering, was in contact with the floor. During another observation on 8/15/25, the resident was again in the activity room and the catheter bag was covered with a cloth covering while the tubing was in contact with the floor. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including infection and inflammatory reaction due to an indwelling urethral catheter, urinary tract infection, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. A significant change MDS dated 7/15/25 indicated severe cognitive deficit and the need for an indwelling urinary catheter. The care plan dated 7/28/25 identified a Foley catheter due to neurogenic bladder and included an intervention to position the catheter tubing and bag to avoid contact with the floor. During interview, a CNA stated the catheter bag and/or tubing should never touch the floor because it was an infection risk, and the DON confirmed the bag or tubing should be kept from floor contact and provided the facility policy stating the urinary drainage bag should not be allowed to touch the floor.
Expired Aplisol Vial Kept in Medication Room Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Aplisol solution was disposed of after its use-by period had expired. During observation of the south medication room with an LPN, an opened vial of Aplisol was found in the refrigerator with an opened date of 6/30/25. The LPN stated she was not sure how long Aplisol could be used after opening. Later interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed that Aplisol can be used for 30 days after opening and then should be discarded. The Regional Nurse Consultant also provided the facility’s Aplisol policy, last revised in November 2013, which stated that vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation that may affect potency.
Failure to Follow Antibiotic Stewardship Protocol for Prophylactic UTI Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its antibiotic stewardship protocol for one resident who had been receiving Macrobid 100 mg by mouth at bedtime as a prophylactic UTI maintenance dose since admission, with no stop date. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including UTI, acute kidney failure, and dysuria, and a significant change MDS dated 7/9/25 indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had received an antibiotic medication. The record also showed a care plan for urinary incontinence with interventions to encourage adequate fluid intake and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection, but it lacked documentation of a care plan specific to prophylactic antibiotic use. The record further lacked recent urinalysis lab work, documentation that the physician assessed the resident to determine the need for long-term prophylactic antibiotic use, and evidence that the physician educated the resident and/or responsible party regarding long-term antibiotic use. A history and physical dated 4/29/25 stated the resident was to continue Macrobid for UTI prophylaxis. During interviews, the DON stated the resident had been placed on the prophylactic antibiotic due to chronic UTIs, had been on it since before admission, and the facility had not performed a urinalysis since admission. The IP nurse stated the facility used McGreer’s criteria for infection surveillance, and the RNC provided the facility’s ASP policy, which stated the facility implemented an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote appropriate antibiotic use and reduce antibiotic resistance.
Resident Dignity Compromised During Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dignity of a resident, identified as Resident 72, during transportation from the shower room to their room. On the morning of July 18, 2024, a student nurse aide was observed transporting the resident in an open shower chair with the resident's buttocks exposed. The resident was only partially covered with a light blanket in the front, while the back remained uncovered. This incident was witnessed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who confirmed that the resident should have been completely covered during transportation. Resident 72 had a medical history that included encephalopathy, altered mental status, and cognitive communication deficit, requiring maximum assistance from two persons for care needs. The resident's care plan indicated the need for assistance with activities of daily living and transportation. The facility's policy on resident rights, which emphasizes respect and dignity, was not adhered to in this instance, as the resident's dignity was compromised during the transportation process.
Failure to Document and Notify During Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper documentation and notification during the transfer of a resident to the hospital. Resident 17, who has a diagnosis of epilepsy, was transferred to the hospital following a seizure. The documentation, specifically the SBAR form, was incomplete and did not include notifications to the physician or the family representative about the transfer. This oversight was confirmed during interviews with the staff, including a Licensed Practical Nurse and the Regional Nurse Consultant, who could not find any record of such notifications. The incident involved Resident 17, who was cognitively intact and had experienced a seizure, leading to an overnight hospital stay. The nurse's note from the time of the incident indicated that the resident was unresponsive to verbal stimulation, regained consciousness, but appeared pale and flushed, with nausea and vomiting. Despite these details, the nurse's note also lacked documentation of notifying the physician or family representative, which is a requirement according to the facility's policy. The nurse responsible for completing the SBAR form was no longer employed at the facility, further complicating the situation.
Failure to Maintain Catheter Bag Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper care for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter, as the catheter bag and tubing were repeatedly observed in contact with the floor. During multiple observations over several days, the catheter bag was seen touching the floor while the resident was seated in different positions, such as in a recliner, wheelchair, and on the side of the bed. The facility's policy clearly stated that urinary drainage bags should not touch the floor, yet this guideline was not adhered to, as confirmed by the Assistant Director of Nursing during an interview. The resident involved had a medical history that included obstructive and reflux uropathy, unspecified hydronephrosis, retention of urine, and a urinary tract infection (UTI). The resident required extensive assistance with transfers and toileting and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Despite being on antibiotics for a UTI, the resident reported having taken the medication for only three days. The facility's failure to maintain the catheter bag off the floor was a direct violation of their urinary drainage bag maintenance policy, which was provided by the Regional Nurse Consultant.
Medication Labeling and Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications for residents, as observed during a survey. Specifically, two medication carts and one treatment cart were found to have deficiencies in medication labeling and storage. For Resident 72, a Lantus insulin pen was observed without a pharmacy prescription label or an indication of when it was opened. Additionally, the Lantus insulin vial for the same resident lacked an opening date. Resident 63's Lantus insulin pen and Resident 5's Novolog and Aspart insulin pens also did not have labels indicating the date they were opened, despite having dispense dates. Furthermore, during an observation of the north back hall treatment medication cart, numerous prescribed ointments and topical medications were found loose in the drawer, unbagged, and several lacked prescription labels. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN and the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that insulin vials and pens should be dated when opened and discarded after a specific period, and treatment medications should be separated in individual bags. The facility's policies on medication storage and expiration, provided by the Regional Nurse Consultant, were not adhered to, contributing to the deficiencies observed.
Failure to Document Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications administered to a resident were properly documented, as evidenced by the review of Resident 39's records. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including overactive bladder, vascular dementia, anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Despite having physician's orders for medications such as oxybutynin chloride, galantamine, lorazepam, atorvastatin, and memantine, the July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) lacked documentation of these medications being administered on the evening shift of July 3, 2024. During an interview, the Regional Clinical Nurse confirmed that the expectation was for nurses to document medication administration at the time of administration. The facility's policy, provided by the Regional Nurse Consultant, also stated that medication doses should be recorded on the MAR after the resident's consumption. This lack of documentation for Resident 39's medications on the specified date indicates a failure to adhere to the facility's medication administration policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 176 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Clinton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinton Gardens | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Majestic Care Of Terre Haute | 9.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Providence Health Care Center | 9.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Signature Healthcare Of Terre Haute | 10.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Harrison's Crossing Health Campus | 10.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Vermillion Convalescent Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.