Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Envive Of Anderson during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan for Admission Pressure Injury: A resident was admitted with a coccyx wound, but the record did not contain a baseline care plan with individualized interventions within 48 hours. The admission assessment triggered a skin integrity prompt, and the later care plan addressed impaired skin integrity in general terms, while RN and DON interviews confirmed the wound should have been included in the baseline care plan.
A resident with CKD, CHF, atrial fibrillation, and moderate pressure injury risk was admitted with a stage 2 coccyx pressure ulcer and later documented with additional pressure injuries to the feet, including a DTI and an unstageable wound. The record lacked wound treatment orders for the coccyx and did not show an individualized care plan with healing goals or interventions. During wound care observation, an LPN said no wound treatment orders were in place other than skin protectant to the heels, and a dark area was noted on the right heel with no treatment order.
QAPI Program Failed to Address Repeat Pressure Injury Deficiencies: The facility did not have a current QAPI plan or action plan related to pressure injuries, and repeat concerns were cited again during survey. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound assessments, wound monitoring, and wound treatments in a manner to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. The QAA committee reviewed prior citations and trends, but the pressure injury issue remained unresolved in the QAPI process.
Failure to Use EBP During Wound Care: An LPN performed dressing care for a resident with a stage 4 sacral pressure injury without wearing the required gown under EBP. The resident’s orders and care plans indicated EBP was required for the wound, and the DON confirmed that gown and gloves were required for the dressing change.
Outdated nursing staffing postings were observed at the entrance, including a form that lacked census information and remained posted after the date had changed. The scheduler said she prepared staffing sheets in advance and forgot to update the form over a weekend, so the posting was not current for several days and was not updated on the morning of the next shift. The facility policy required RN, LPN/LVN, and CNA/NA staffing numbers to be posted within 2 hours of each shift in a prominent, accessible location.
Dietary staff failed to demonstrate competence in testing sanitizer levels for a low-temp dishwasher. The Dietary Manager used a temperature test strip instead of a chlorine test strip, did not know the required ppm for proper sanitation, and stated he had used the wrong strips as a backup without knowing how they worked. The DON confirmed that most residents ate meals prepared in the facility kitchen, and the facility policy required a 50 ppm chlorine final rinse with periodic testing at least once per shift.
Missing transfer, bed-hold, and ombudsman notifications: Two residents were sent to the hospital or ER, but the record did not show that the resident or representative received the required written transfer/discharge form or bed-hold policy. One resident was non-responsive with respiratory failure and cancer, and another had encephalopathy, malnutrition, and heart disease and was sent out for evaluation and treatment. The facility also failed to document LTC Ombudsman notification for two hospital transfers, including a resident with dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and COPD and another resident with respiratory failure and breast cancer.
A resident with impaired mobility, dementia, malnutrition, and active wounds to the right ankle and foot was repeatedly observed in bed without the ordered padded heel boots. Staff observed the dressing side of the affected foot positioned flat against the bed on multiple occasions, and the ADON confirmed the boots were not being worn as ordered. The wound orders, care plan, and wound documentation all directed use of padded boots along with daily wound care, but the facility did not follow the physician’s orders.
Failure to Monitor and Treat a Stage IV Pressure Ulcer: A resident with MS, weakness, and a stage IV coccyx/sacral pressure injury had ordered wound care, weekly skin assessments, and pressure reduction measures, but the record lacked weekly wound measurements after the last wound clinic visit. During observed wound care, the dressing was saturated with purulent drainage and foul odor, the wound had exposed bone, and an LPN performed the treatment without glove changes or hand hygiene after contamination, while wound supplies were placed directly on the resident’s nightstand items.
The facility did not consistently provide opportunities for residents who required supervision to go outside as they preferred, especially when staff were unavailable on weekends or outside of scheduled times. Several residents with significant medical conditions expressed that going outside was very important to them, but their access was limited by staffing constraints and facility procedures.
An LPN failed to secure a 30-pill card of tramadol, an opioid analgesic, after receiving it from the pharmacy. The medication was left unsupervised on a desk in the nurses' station, leading to its disappearance. Facility policy requires Schedule II medications to be stored under double lock, which was not followed in this instance.
A facility failed to manage a resident's personal funds properly, resulting in negative balances due to a returned check and erroneous care cost charges. The Business Office Manager and Corporate Business Office Consultant identified the issue but did not effectively follow up with the third-party billing company to resolve the inappropriate charges. The facility's policy on monthly audits of resident accounts was not adequately implemented, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with a PICC line for IV antibiotics had a loose dressing that was not changed as ordered, leading to an infection control deficiency. Despite physician orders for weekly dressing changes and as needed, the dressing remained unchanged since 7/16/24. Observations confirmed the non-occlusive dressing, and interviews with the resident and staff highlighted the oversight. The facility's policy required immediate dressing changes if compromised, which was not adhered to, raising infection prevention concerns.
The facility failed to label insulin pens with resident identifiers on a medication cart, affecting six residents. Additionally, expired influenza vaccines were found in the medication room, indicating a lapse in timely disposal. RN 6 confirmed the deficiencies during observations.
The facility failed to implement corrective actions for systemic issues related to medication expiration and resident fund management. Despite having a QAPI action plan, inspections of medication rooms were incomplete, and audits showed no identified concerns. The facility's QAPI policy aimed to correct deficiencies, but the survey found it ineffective in addressing the issues.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan for Admission Pressure Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for a resident admitted with a pressure injury. Resident 56 was admitted with a wound on the coccyx noted on the 4/1/26 admission assessment, and the assessment included a prompt for a baseline care plan related to impaired skin integrity with general interventions such as diet as ordered, observing skin with daily cares, and notifying the nurse of any new or worsening areas. The record did not contain a baseline care plan with individualized interventions for the coccyx wound that was present on admission. A current care plan was initiated on 4/2/26 and identified the resident as at risk for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility and self-care deficit, with interventions including encouraging nutrition and hydration, keeping skin clean and dry, using lotion on dry skin, observing skin with daily cares, notifying the nurse of any new or worsening areas, and treatments as ordered. During interviews, RN 4 stated that the admission assessment should generate a baseline care plan in the EHR and that it should include what staff needed to start caring for the resident, including a wound found during the admission assessment. The DON also stated that a wound found during the admission assessment should have been included in the baseline care plan.
Failure to Initiate Wound Treatment Orders and Individualized Pressure Injury Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure treatment orders were in place and interventions were developed and implemented to promote healing of a pressure injury for one resident. The resident had diagnoses including stage III chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, and was assessed as moderately at risk for pressure injury formation. On admission, the resident was documented as having a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the coccyx, and the record also reflected a reported wound to the left heel and coccyx. A later wound note identified a left medial foot deep tissue injury, a left lateral foot unstageable pressure injury, and a stage 2 pressure injury, all present on admission. The clinical record did not show wound treatment orders for the coccyx wound, and the record lacked an individualized care plan with goals for healing and individualized interventions to promote healing and comfort. During wound care observation, an LPN stated that no other wound treatment orders were in place other than applying skin protectant to the heels. The resident’s pressure relief boots were removed and skin protectant was applied to both heels, and a large dark area was observed on the right heel; the LPN stated he was unsure how long it had been present and that no orders were in place to treat it. The resident declined observation of the coccyx during the observation. The resident’s admission MDS indicated moderate cognitive impairment, total dependence for toilet hygiene and rolling, and that the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan addressed enhanced barrier precautions and listed the pressure injuries, but the record lacked individualized healing goals and interventions. Staff interviews indicated that admission skin and wound assessments were completed and abnormal findings were to be communicated to the provider, and the DON stated that wound findings were documented and communicated through secure messaging. The facility policy required wound assessments and treatment to begin when pressure ulcers were identified, and required the care plan to be revised to reflect altered skin integrity, approaches, and goals for care.
QAPI Program Failed to Address Repeat Pressure Injury Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a QAPI program to prevent repeat deficiencies related to interventions for healing pressure injuries. Review of the prior annual recertification and licensure survey completed on July 25, 2025 showed deficiencies for failure to obtain wound assessments, monitoring, and treatments in a manner to promote healing of a pressure injury. During interview, the Administrator stated the QAA committee met monthly and reviewed areas of concern, trends, and increases in occurrence, and that previous annual survey citations were reviewed through the time frame listed on the POC, usually for six months. The facility did not have a current QAPI plan or action plan in place related to pressure injury. Repeat concerns regarding pressure injuries were cited again during the April 10, 2026 survey. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound assessments, wound monitoring, and wound treatments in a manner to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)-Governance and Leadership, revised 8/24, stated the QAPI committee was responsible for collecting and analyzing performance indicator data, identifying and improving facility systems and processes, and helping resolve negative outcomes and care quality problems identified during the QAPI process.
Failure to Use Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during a wound dressing change for a resident with a stage 4 sacral pressure injury. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and unspecified bipolar disorder, and current wound orders directed cleansing of the sacral wound, application of calcium alginate to the wound bed, zinc paste around the wound bed, and coverage with a bordered silicone dressing. The resident’s care plan and EBP care plan both indicated the resident required enhanced barrier precautions because of the wound and to help prevent the spread of organisms, and the quarterly MDS noted the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had one stage 4 pressure injury. During the wound treatment observation, the LPN set up supplies, performed hand hygiene, and donned gloves, but did not wear the required gown while removing the old dressing and applying the new treatment. He removed the old dressing, cleansed the wound, applied the calcium alginate and skin protectant, and covered the wound with a bordered silicone dressing. When interviewed at the time of the observation, the LPN stated he had forgotten to wear the proper PPE and had gotten nervous. The DON later stated that EBP was required for residents with wounds, medical devices, and/or a history of MDROs, and that the LPN should have worn both a gown and gloves during the dressing change.
Outdated nursing staffing postings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post current and accurate nursing staff information daily for residents and visitors. On 4/6/26 at 6:13 a.m., the nurse staffing information posted on a small table to the right of the entrance doors was dated 4/2/26 and did not include a census number. The posting listed RN, LPN, QMA, and CNA hours for each shift, but it was not current. During later observations, the staffing posting remained outdated on 4/7/26 at 9:06 a.m., still showing the 4/6/26 form, and on 4/8/26 at 9:07 a.m., the 4/7/26 form was still posted. The scheduler stated she completed the form the night before and placed it under the current posting, and that management removed the previous day’s posting the following morning. She also stated she had worked as a CNA over the weekend of 4/3/26 through 4/5/26 and forgot to update the form, so the staffing posting would not have been updated and/or current on those days or on the morning of 4/6/26. The facility policy required the number of licensed nurses and unlicensed nursing personnel to be posted within two hours of the beginning of each shift in a prominent, accessible, clear, and readable location.
Dietary Staff Used Incorrect Test Strips for Dishwasher Sanitizer Testing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure dietary employees were competent in dishwasher sanitation testing. During an observation of dishwasher operations in the kitchen, the Dietary Manager identified the machine as a low-temperature dishwasher that used a chlorine-based sanitizer in the final rinse. He placed a test strip inside the machine and stated the strip could be used to test sanitizer levels both internally and externally in the water well on the outside of the dishwasher, but the strips in use had red writing and a red band and were not the traditional all-white dip-stick style. He also stated he did not know how many parts per million of sanitizing agent were needed to equal proper sanitation. The test strip displayed was labeled as a temperature test strip and did not indicate that it tested for chlorine content. The Dietary Manager stated he was unable to find chlorine test strips and would look for the product. In a later interview, he said he had last seen the chlorine test strips several days earlier, believed they had gotten wet and were thrown away, and could not find any other chlorine test strips. He also stated he had used the temperature test strips as a backup without knowing how they worked. The DON stated that 57 of the facility's 58 residents consumed food orally and ate meals prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility policy on sanitization stated that low-temperature dishwashers require a final rinse of 50 ppm hypochlorite and that the chemical solution must be maintained at the correct concentration based on periodic testing at least once per shift.
Missing transfer, bed-hold, and ombudsman notifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold policy and transfer/discharge notifications to the resident or representative for two residents who were sent to the hospital. One resident had diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and malignant neoplasm of the right breast and was transported to the hospital after becoming non-responsive and having a change in level of consciousness. The clinical record did not show that the resident or representative received a copy of the transfer/discharge form or the bed-hold policy. Staff stated that paperwork such as the face sheet, code status, medication list, and last medication administration information was sent with emergency transport staff or the family, but the DON stated there was no further information showing who received copies of the transfer/discharge form or bed-hold policy. Another resident had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and atherosclerotic heart disease of the coronary artery and was transferred to the ER for evaluation and treatment. The record documented that the physician, DON, and resident representative were notified, and the resident was discharged with return anticipated, but it lacked information showing that the resident or representative received a written transfer/discharge form or bed-hold policy. An LPN stated that when a resident was sent to the ER, she printed the resident’s transfer/discharge page, a bed-hold policy, and current orders, and provided copies to the EMTs and hospital, but this was not documented in the resident’s record. The facility also failed to notify the LTC Ombudsman of hospital transfers for two residents. One resident with vascular dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and COPD was sent to the ER after vomiting a foul-smelling black liquid and being unable to express himself, then returned to the facility two days later; the record and the June 2025 Ombudsman fax log lacked documentation of notification. Another resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and malignant neoplasm of the right breast was hospitalized after becoming non-responsive, and the record and fax log also lacked Ombudsman notification. Facility staff stated that the June 2025 transfer/discharge notifications sent to the State Ombudsman did not include all residents transferred or discharged that month because the report had been filtered incorrectly, resulting in missed transfers and discharges.
Failure to Follow Heel Boot Orders for Resident with Wounds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician’s orders for a resident with current skin conditions by not placing padded heel boots as ordered. Resident 36 had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and atherosclerotic heart disease, and was identified as at risk for altered skin integrity related to impaired mobility and dementia. Current wound orders directed staff to cleanse the right lateral ankle and right lateral foot, apply medical grade honey, cover with bordered foam, and apply padded boots. The resident also had a wound infection/cellulitis care plan and a wound document noting a new open area to the right lateral foot with instructions to apply boots. During multiple observations, the resident was found lying or seated in bed with bare feet, the dressing side of the right ankle and foot positioned flat against the bed, and no heel boots in place. This occurred repeatedly across several observations, including when the resident was sleeping and during a wound observation with the ADON and an LPN present. The ADON stated the resident was not wearing heel boots as ordered and that the boots were intended to assist with wound healing, resident comfort, and prevention of further wound development. The Corporate Nurse Consultant stated the facility did not have a policy for following physician’s orders.
Failure to Monitor and Treat a Stage IV Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide wound assessments, monitoring, and wound treatments in a manner intended to promote healing of a stage IV pressure ulcer for a resident with multiple sclerosis, weakness, and a pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The resident was dependent on staff for repositioning and had a stage IV coccyx/sacral pressure injury present on admission. Current orders included cleansing the coccyx area with Dakins solution, packing with Dakins fluffed gauze, covering with a superabsorbent pad, and securing with a silicone bordered superabsorbent dressing daily and as needed, along with weekly skin assessments and use of a pressure reducing mattress. The resident’s record showed the wound was large and full thickness, with exposed bone and drainage. A wound center note documented the pressure injury measuring 10 cm by 10 cm by 3 cm with exposed bone and moderate drainage, and a later wound center note documented the wound measuring 9.5 cm by 10.5 cm by 3.3 cm with 3.8 cm undermining from 1:00 to 5:00, exposed bone, and moderate serosanguineous drainage. The resident’s care plan directed staff to administer treatments as ordered, monitor wound healing, measure length, width, and depth where possible, assess the wound perimeter and bed, and document weekly treatment measurements. However, the clinical record lacked weekly wound assessments of the sacral pressure injury, including wound measurements, from the last wound clinic appointment through the end of the review period. During wound treatment observation, the old dressing was saturated with purulent drainage and had a foul odor, and purulent drainage was present on the gauze packed in the wound bed. The wound was described as approximately the size of a softball with bone exposed. The LPN performed the dressing change without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene after touching contaminated surfaces and before continuing wound care. Wound supplies were placed directly on top of personal items on the resident’s nightstand rather than on a barrier. The DON stated it was not appropriate to avoid glove changes and hand hygiene during wound care when touching surfaces, removing old dressings, and applying new dressings, and that supplies should have been placed on a barrier rather than against a contaminated surface.
Failure to Ensure Resident Access to Outdoor Areas per Preference
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were consistently afforded the opportunity to go outside according to their preferences, weather permitting, as required by resident rights regulations. Four residents with varying diagnoses, including chronic respiratory failure, dementia, COPD, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction, were identified as valuing outdoor access as very important. Interviews and record reviews revealed that residents who could not sign themselves out or required supervision were only able to go outside if staff were available to accompany or monitor them. On weekends, when the receptionist and some activity staff were not present, these residents often could not go outside due to lack of supervision. Staff interviews confirmed that the ability for residents to go outside was dependent on staff availability, with some residents only able to go out during scheduled smoke breaks or when the receptionist was present to supervise. A facility list indicated which residents could sign themselves out and which required supervision, but those needing supervision were not always accommodated, especially on weekends. This practice affected at least 17 residents who could not go outside without supervision, limiting their ability to exercise their rights to a dignified existence and self-determination.
Failure to Secure Narcotics Leads to Missing Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safe handling of narcotics, specifically tramadol, due to improper procedures followed by an LPN. On the evening of 11/24/24, the LPN received a delivery of medications from the pharmacy, including a 30-pill card of tramadol, an opioid analgesic. Instead of securing the medication immediately, the LPN placed the pill card unsupervised on the back of the desk in the nurses' station. The LPN became distracted and did not secure the tramadol in the locked narcotic drawer of the medication cart, as required by facility policy. The oversight was discovered during the morning medication administration pass when the LPN realized the tramadol was missing. Interviews conducted during the survey revealed that medications from the pharmacy should be checked and signed off by the nurse upon receipt, and narcotics should be locked in a cart until they can be delivered to the proper cart. The DON confirmed that the LPN had reported being distracted and leaving the tramadol unsecured, which resulted in the medication going missing. The facility's policy on controlled medication ordering and receipt mandates that Schedule II medications be stored under double lock, and the medication nurse on duty should maintain possession of the key to controlled medications. This incident was related to a complaint investigation, indicating a failure to adhere to established protocols for handling controlled substances.
Deficiency in Managing Resident Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to manage a resident's personal funds in accordance with acceptable accounting principles, resulting in a deficiency. The Business Office Manager provided a Resident Funds Trial Balance sheet, which revealed that one resident had two separate accounts with negative balances. Specifically, one account had a negative balance of $2,911.47, and another had a negative balance of $15.16. The issue arose when a personal check credited to the resident's account was returned, leading to a negative balance. Additionally, automated care cost withdrawals were deducted after deposits were made, and a second care cost charge was erroneously applied in the same month. Furthermore, the funds were deposited into an inappropriate account for medical expenses, which was later corrected, resulting in two accounts for the resident. Interviews with the Corporate Business Office Consultant and the Business Office Manager revealed that they had reached out to a third-party billing company regarding the inappropriate charges but had not received a response. The Business Office Manager did not follow up on the initial communication. The Corporate Business Office Consultant later spoke with a representative from the third-party billing company, who assured that the charge error would be refunded. The facility's policy on Resident Funds Management System, which mandates monthly audits of resident accounts, was not effectively implemented in this case, leading to the oversight and subsequent deficiency.
Failure to Maintain Intact PICC Dressings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that protective PICC dressings were intact and changed as ordered for a resident, leading to a deficiency in infection control. Resident 151, who was admitted with cellulitis of the left upper limb and sepsis due to streptococcus group A, had a PICC line in her right upper arm. Observations on multiple occasions revealed that the PICC dressing was loose and had not been changed since 7/16/24, despite a physician's order for weekly dressing changes and as needed when the dressing was loose. The resident's clinical record lacked evidence of PICC line dressing changes during the specified times, even though the dressing was visibly non-occlusive. Interviews with Resident 151 and facility staff confirmed that the dressing had not been changed as required. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that PICC line dressings should be changed every seven days or immediately if not occlusive, and that they should be assessed each time IV antibiotics are administered. The facility's policy on Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, revised in March 2022, also emphasized the need for immediate dressing changes if the integrity of the dressing is compromised. The failure to maintain an occlusive dressing was identified as an infection prevention and control concern.
Medication Labeling and Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper labeling of insulin pens with resident identifiers on one of the medication storage carts reviewed. During an observation of the front treatment cart, several Humalog Kwikpens were found without labels indicating the resident's name or directions for use. RN 6, who was present during the observation, was unable to confirm how long the unlabeled pens had been in the cart. It was noted that six different residents received insulin from this cart, highlighting the importance of proper labeling to ensure accurate administration. Additionally, the facility did not dispose of expired vaccinations in a timely manner. During an observation of the front medication room, two boxes of Influenza Vaccine with expired dates were found stored in the refrigerator. RN 6 acknowledged that these vaccines were expired and should not be administered to residents, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its policy on medication storage. The facility's policies, dated 2020, require that medications be labeled with specific information and that outdated or deteriorated medications be immediately removed from stock.
Failure to Implement Corrective Actions for Medication and Resident Fund Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement corrective and preventive actions to address systemic issues related to resident funds, medication labeling, and medication expiration. The root cause analysis revealed that medication carts and rooms were not routinely inspected, leading to the presence of expired medications. Despite having a QAPI action plan dated 5/17/24, which included inspecting and removing expired medications from the front medication room by 5/16/24, the back unit medication room inspection lacked a completion date. Furthermore, the facility's QAPI team met monthly, with the last meeting on 6/28/24, but there was no evidence of audits related to acceptable accounting principles for managing resident funds. The facility's undated current policy on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) indicated objectives to correct identified quality and safety deficiencies. However, the survey findings showed that the facility did not effectively implement these processes. Audit tools for May, June, and July 2024, provided by the Chief Operating Officer, showed no identified concerns, and comments on the audits mentioned adjustments would be made as needed for ongoing compliance. Despite these measures, the facility failed to demonstrate an effective ongoing program to address the deficiencies identified in the survey.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 598 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Anderson
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethany Pointe Health Campus | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 1 |
| Beaumont Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 27 | 0 |
| Edgewater Woods | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Northview Health And Living | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Countryside Manor Health & Living Community | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Envive Of Anderson.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.