Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Ensure Resident Access to Outdoor Areas per Preference

Anderson, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were consistently afforded the opportunity to go outside according to their preferences, weather permitting, as required by resident rights regulations. Four residents with varying diagnoses, including chronic respiratory failure, dementia, COPD, and non-traumatic brain dysfunction, were identified as valuing outdoor access as very important. Interviews and record reviews revealed that residents who could not sign themselves out or required supervision were only able to go outside if staff were available to accompany or monitor them. On weekends, when the receptionist and some activity staff were not present, these residents often could not go outside due to lack of supervision. Staff interviews confirmed that the ability for residents to go outside was dependent on staff availability, with some residents only able to go out during scheduled smoke breaks or when the receptionist was present to supervise. A facility list indicated which residents could sign themselves out and which required supervision, but those needing supervision were not always accommodated, especially on weekends. This practice affected at least 17 residents who could not go outside without supervision, limiting their ability to exercise their rights to a dignified existence and self-determination.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙