Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Colonial Nursing Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not ensure proper verification of dishwasher sanitation levels in the main kitchen when the Dietary Food Manager used faulty test strips that failed to show a discernable color change, leaving the sanitation status unconfirmed for food served to most residents.
Surveyors identified that several rooms did not meet the required minimum square footage per resident, with one single occupancy room measuring less than 100 sq ft and multiple occupancy rooms providing less than 80 sq ft per resident. The Administrator confirmed these rooms had variances and did not meet regulatory standards.
A resident with diabetes and other medical conditions had insulin doses held on several occasions when blood sugar readings were below certain levels, but there were no physician orders for holding the medication, no documentation of physician notification, and no progress notes explaining the held doses. The DON confirmed that refusals should have been documented instead of holding the medication without proper notification.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, and type 2 diabetes had a recurring diabetic foot ulcer that was open and receiving wound care per physician orders. Despite recommendations for pressure reduction and repositioning, the facility did not have a comprehensive care plan addressing the diabetic foot ulcer, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident with a history of schizophrenia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder was noted to have persistent redness in the right eye, which was observed by staff and confirmed on multiple occasions. Despite this, there was no documentation of assessment or monitoring of the eye condition in the medical record, and the DON had no additional information regarding the issue.
A resident with a surgically debrided right heel pressure ulcer and complex wound care needs did not have physician orders entered for a wound vac or rescue dressing, despite clinical recommendations and facility policy requiring such documentation. The DON confirmed that the necessary orders were missing from the medical record.
A resident with chronic kidney disease and recent surgery was not placed on a prescribed fluid restriction upon readmission, despite care plan documentation indicating an 1800 mL limit. No physician orders or monitoring of fluid intake were present, and facility policy for fluid restriction was not followed.
A resident with heart failure and other chronic conditions received continuous oxygen despite a PRN order, with no documentation in the MAR or TAR of administration or oxygen saturation monitoring. The DON reported staff kept oxygen on at all times for shortness of breath, and facility policy requiring documentation was not followed.
A nurse was observed discarding used lancets into a regular garbage can instead of a sharps container during blood glucose testing for a resident. Despite being aware of the correct procedure, the nurse repeated this action, which was not in accordance with facility infection control policy as confirmed by the DON.
Surveyors observed unsanitary conditions in the main kitchen, including food splashes and debris on the wall next to the stove top and a buildup of debris on the floor and baseboard under the dishwasher. The DFM confirmed these areas needed a deep clean but had not been addressed due to staffing assignments.
The facility failed to ensure correct PPE use and hand hygiene by staff, impacting residents under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Two CNAs did not initially apply necessary PPE when caring for residents with feeding tubes and pressure wounds. Additionally, a CNA did not wash hands between resident care and used the same package of wipes for multiple residents, despite available supplies.
The facility failed to maintain a clean and well-repaired environment on the first floor, with issues such as scraped paint, dried feeding on equipment, and debris on floors. Despite the Housekeeping Completion Form indicating daily cleaning requirements, observed conditions contradicted these protocols, suggesting a failure in the housekeeping process.
The facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for two residents, resulting in soiled bed linens. A resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was found with a dried urine ring under the incontinent pad, while another resident with a urinary catheter and a pressure ulcer had dried blood and drainage on the sheet. These deficiencies were observed during incontinence care by agency staff.
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for two residents dependent on staff. One resident was left in a saturated brief and pad from 3:00 a.m. until 7:19 a.m., despite needing maximum assistance. Another resident was found in a similar state, with care delayed until staff intervened. Both residents had care plans indicating incontinence and required assistance for toileting and hygiene.
The facility failed to meet the required square footage per resident in eight rooms, with single rooms measuring less than 100 square feet and multiple rooms providing less than 80 square feet per bed. The Administrator confirmed these rooms had variance waivers and did not meet the required standards.
A facility failed to document catheter care and urinary output for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. Despite a care plan and physician's order requiring monitoring every shift, records for March and April lacked documentation. The Infection Preventionist confirmed the absence of documentation, violating the facility's policy on maintaining accurate records and clean techniques.
A cognitively impaired resident was not provided with appropriate activities, despite care plans indicating preferences for music and group activities. Observations showed the resident in a dark room without engagement, and staff interviews revealed a lack of structured one-on-one activities and documentation.
A resident with a history of hemiparesis, hemiplegia, diabetes, and heart failure had two open wounds on her right shin that were not properly assessed or monitored by the facility. Despite physician orders to apply Betadine and monitor the wounds, there was no documentation of assessments until a later date, violating the facility's wound management policy.
A facility failed to implement an Occupational Therapy recommendation for a resting hand splint for a resident with hemiplegia and dementia. The resident was observed without the splint, and there were no physician's orders for it. The Director of Rehab was unaware of the discontinuation, and the DON noted the resident's mother refused the splint, but this was undocumented.
A resident with a PICC line for IV antibiotics did not receive proper line care according to professional standards. The facility failed to document saline flushes before and after antibiotic administration, as required by policy. The DON confirmed the oversight during an interview.
A resident with chronic respiratory conditions was observed receiving an incorrect oxygen flow rate on two occasions, contrary to a physician's order for 3 lpm continuously. The discrepancy was identified and corrected during an observation with the DON.
A facility failed to maintain complete and accurate incontinence care logs for a resident with acute respiratory failure, heart failure, and bipolar disorder. The care plan required documentation every shift, but several days had missing or insufficient entries. Staff acknowledged the lapses and mentioned issues with accessing charting during shifts.
Dishwasher Sanitation Testing Failure in Main Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment by not properly testing the sanitation level of the dishwasher. During an observation, the Dietary Food Manager (DFM) used test strips to check the dishwasher's sanitation level, but the strips did not show a discernable color change as expected. The DFM was unsure why the strips were not working and attempted to use a new package of strips, which also failed to provide a clear result. The DFM indicated that these strips had always been used, but could not explain the malfunction. This deficiency had the potential to affect 26 of 29 residents who received food from the kitchen, as the effectiveness of the dishwasher's sanitation could not be verified at the time of the survey.
Resident Room Size Below Regulatory Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required minimum square footage per resident in both single and multiple occupancy rooms, as determined by observation, record review, and interview. Specifically, one single resident room measured only 96.2 square feet, which is below the required 100 square feet. Additionally, several multiple resident rooms were found to have less than the required 80 square feet per resident, with measurements ranging from 70.0 to 75.2 square feet per bed. These deficiencies were identified in eight rooms, some of which were unoccupied at the time of the survey. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed that these rooms had variances and did not meet the required square footage standards.
Failure to Notify Physician When Insulin Held Due to Blood Sugar Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's physician when insulin doses were held due to blood sugar levels, as required. Record review for a resident with diagnoses including cellulitis, type 2 diabetes, and a pressure ulcer showed that Novolog insulin was ordered to be administered three times daily with meals. However, the Medication Administration Record indicated that the insulin was held on multiple occasions when the resident's blood sugar was below certain levels. There were no physician orders specifying parameters for holding the medication, no progress notes documenting the medication being held, and no evidence that the physician was notified when the insulin was not administered. Interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the resident often refused insulin based on blood sugar readings, but the nurse should have documented these as refusals rather than holding the medication. The Director of Nursing confirmed there was no further information to provide regarding physician notification or documentation for the held doses.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident with a diabetic foot ulcer. During wound care observation, the resident was found to have an open ulcer on the left lateral foot, which was being treated according to physician orders. The resident's medical record showed a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis, cognitive communication deficit, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, with severe cognitive impairment and dependence on staff for all activities of daily living. The resident had a recurring diabetic foot ulcer that had healed and reopened multiple times, with the most recent reopening documented in the clinical notes. Despite ongoing wound care and recommendations for pressure reduction and repositioning, the resident's record did not contain a comprehensive care plan specifically addressing the diabetic foot ulcer. The existing care plan only addressed general risk for skin integrity issues and did not include specific interventions for the current wound. The Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no care plan in place for the diabetic foot ulcer at the time of the survey, despite the wound being open and under treatment.
Failure to Assess and Monitor Resident's Eye Condition
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including schizophrenia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder was observed to have a solid red discoloration on the bottom portion of the sclera in her right eye. The resident reported that the redness had been present for some time, though she was initially unaware of it until nursing staff pointed it out. Observations on two separate occasions confirmed the persistent redness. Review of the resident's medical record revealed no documentation of assessment or monitoring of the right eye discoloration. During an interview, the DON confirmed there was no further information available regarding the resident's red eye. The deficiency was identified due to the facility's failure to assess and monitor the resident's eye condition as required, despite clear evidence of an ongoing issue.
Failure to Obtain Physician Orders for Wound Vac and Dressing
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of cellulitis of the right lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel was observed to have a wound vac placed to the right heel following a recent hospital admission and surgical debridement due to infection. The wound vac was to be continued at 100 mmHg per the surgeon's request, with a rescue dressing of calcium alginate with silver, and specific instructions for dressing changes and wound care were documented in the Skin and Wound Note. Despite these clinical recommendations and the resident's complex wound care needs, there were no corresponding physician's orders for the wound vac or rescue dressing in the medical record for the month. The Director of Nursing confirmed that such orders should have been entered. Facility policy requires that wound treatments and physician's orders be documented in the medical record for residents with skin impairments, but this was not done for the resident in question.
Failure to Implement and Monitor Fluid Restriction for Resident
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and multiple skin conditions was recently readmitted to the facility following surgery and an infection requiring antibiotic therapy. The resident reported having been on a fluid restriction while hospitalized, but upon return to the facility, no such restriction was enforced. Observation revealed a large cup of water at the bedside, and the resident confirmed she was not on a fluid restriction since her return. Record review showed that the resident's care plan included a regular no added salt thin liquid diet with an 1800 milliliter fluid restriction. However, there were no physician orders or documentation regarding fluid intake or restriction in the resident's record. Facility policy required specific instructions and monitoring for fluid restrictions, including removal of water pitchers and documentation of intake, but these procedures were not followed for this resident.
Failure to Provide and Document Appropriate PRN Oxygen Administration
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and hypertension was observed on two occasions receiving continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at a flow rate of 2 liters. The physician's order specified oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula as needed (PRN) for shortness of breath, with instructions to maintain oxygen saturation above 90. The resident's care plan also indicated oxygen should be administered as ordered due to the risk of altered oxygen levels from heart failure. Despite these orders, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month lacked documentation that PRN oxygen had been administered or that the resident's oxygen saturation had been monitored. The resident was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. During an interview, the DON stated that staff kept the oxygen on at all times due to the resident's shortness of breath during care activities, and indicated an intention to update the oxygen orders. Facility policy required documentation of oxygen administration details, but this was not found in the records.
Improper Disposal of Used Lancets During Blood Glucose Testing
Penalty
Summary
A registered nurse was observed performing blood glucose testing on a resident and failed to follow proper infection control procedures regarding the disposal of used lancets. After checking the resident's blood sugar, the nurse discarded the used lancet into a regular garbage can next to the resident's bed instead of using the designated sharps container. This action was observed twice during the same encounter, despite the nurse acknowledging during interviews that the lancets should have been disposed of in the sharps container as per facility policy. The facility's policy on obtaining a fingerstick glucose level clearly states that used lancets must be disposed of in sharps disposal containers. The Director of Nursing confirmed during an interview that the nurse's actions were not in accordance with this policy. The incident involved a resident undergoing blood glucose monitoring, and the nurse's repeated failure to use the sharps container constituted a breach of infection control practices.
Unsanitary Conditions Observed in Main Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary, safe, and homelike environment in the main kitchen, as evidenced by dirty kitchen walls and floors. During an initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), surveyors observed that the wall next to the stove top was covered in splashed food and debris, and the floor and baseboard underneath the dishwasher were dirty and had a buildup of debris. The DFM acknowledged during the interview that these areas required a deep clean and explained that he had not had time to address them because he was not scheduled to be the main cook that day.
Inadequate PPE Use and Hand Hygiene in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by staff members when providing care to residents under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Agency CNA 1 and Agency CNA 5 were observed entering the rooms of residents requiring EBP without initially applying the necessary PPE. Both CNAs were unaware of the EBP requirements until they noticed the signs outside the residents' rooms. Resident D and Resident F, both with diagnoses including stroke and requiring EBP due to feeding tubes and pressure wounds, were involved in these incidents. The facility's policy, which mandates the use of gloves and gowns for high-contact care activities, was not followed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and the exclusive use of personal care items for individual residents. Agency CNA 2 did not wash her hands after providing incontinence care to Resident B before proceeding to care for Resident C. Furthermore, the same package of cleansing wipes was used across multiple residents, including Residents B, C, G, D, and H, despite the availability of additional supplies in the storeroom. This practice was contrary to the facility's hand hygiene policy, which aims to prevent the spread of infections.
Environmental Cleanliness and Maintenance Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and well-repaired environment for residents, staff, and the public on the first floor. During an environmental tour, several deficiencies were observed, including scraped paint, nicks, and gouges on the walls in multiple rooms. Additionally, dried feeding was found on feeding pump poles, an oxygen concentrator, and the floor. Debris and trash were present on the floors, and a dirty floor mat and a stool with a cracked vinyl seat were noted. These observations were made in the presence of the Director of Maintenance/Housekeeping, who acknowledged the issues and provided explanations for some of the deficiencies, such as the presence of cords preventing mopping and the possibility that the housekeeper had not yet cleaned the room. The Housekeeping Completion Form indicated that rooms were to be dusted, swept, and mopped daily, including underneath the bed, and that walls, furniture, and bedrails were to be cleaned daily. However, during an interview, a housekeeper stated that the rooms on the first floor had all been cleaned, which contradicted the observed conditions. This discrepancy suggests a failure in the housekeeping process, as the observed conditions did not align with the facility's cleaning protocol. The citation relates to a specific complaint, indicating that these issues were part of a broader concern raised by stakeholders.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Homelike Environment for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two residents, resulting in soiled bed linens. During an observation, Agency CNA 2 provided incontinence care to Resident B and discovered a dried urine ring under the resident's incontinent pad, indicating that the bottom sheet had not been checked or changed earlier. Resident B's medical records showed a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a moderately impaired cognitive status, and dependency for toileting, with consistent incontinence of bowel and bladder. In another instance, Agency CNA 2 and RN 1 provided incontinence care to Resident D, who had a urinary catheter and was incontinent of bowel. They observed dried blood and other drainage on the sheet under the resident's knee, which RN 1 acknowledged. Resident D's records indicated a history of stroke, a urinary catheter, and a stage three pressure ulcer on the left knee. The care plan required treatment for the pressure ulcer, which had been completed the previous day. These observations were part of a complaint investigation.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for two residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Resident E was observed with a saturated incontinence brief and pad, along with dried urine on the sheets, indicating a lack of timely care. Despite being informed by Agency CNA 2 that incontinence care was last provided at 3:00 a.m., the resident remained in a soiled state until 7:19 a.m. when CNA 3 and LPN 4 finally completed the care. Resident E's care plan indicated urinary incontinence with interventions for care as needed, and the resident's MDS assessment showed a severely impaired cognitive status, requiring maximum assistance for toileting and hygiene. Similarly, Resident F was found with a saturated incontinence brief, top sheet, and lift sheet, with urine rings on the bottom sheet. The care was delayed until Agency CNA 5 and LPN 4 addressed the situation. Resident F's care plan also noted bladder incontinence with interventions for care as needed, and the MDS assessment indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status, with dependency for toileting and hygiene. These observations were part of a complaint investigation, highlighting the facility's failure to ensure timely incontinence care for residents dependent on staff.
Deficiency in Room Square Footage Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required minimum square footage per resident in both single and multiple occupancy rooms, as evidenced by observations, record reviews, and interviews. Specifically, eight out of thirty resident rooms did not meet the regulatory requirements of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms. The deficiency was observed in rooms 101, 104, 111, 201, 202, 204, 206, and 208. For instance, a single resident room measured only 96.2 square feet, while multiple resident rooms had less than the required 80 square feet per bed, with measurements ranging from 70.0 to 75.2 square feet per bed. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that these rooms had variance waivers and did not meet the required square footage.
Failure to Document Catheter Care and Urinary Output
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper catheter care and documentation for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident, who had diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate, was admitted with cognitive impairment and an indwelling urinary catheter. The care plan required monitoring and documenting intake and output, and a physician's order specified monitoring every shift. However, the Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for March and April lacked documentation of catheter care or urine output. During an interview, the Infection Preventionist confirmed the catheter order included monitoring every shift but could not provide documentation that catheter care was completed or urinary output was recorded. The facility's policy on urinary catheter care emphasized maintaining an accurate record of daily output and using clean techniques when handling the catheter. Despite these guidelines, the facility did not document the date and time of catheter care, the name and title of the caregiver, or any assessment data, leading to the deficiency citation.
Failure to Implement Activities for Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement appropriate activities for a cognitively impaired resident, identified as Resident 14, who was observed multiple times lying in bed with no engagement or stimulation. The resident, diagnosed with stroke, aphasia, and depression, was noted to be severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Despite having care plans that indicated the resident's preferences for listening to music, keeping up with the news, and participating in group and religious activities, the resident was not provided with these opportunities. Observations showed the resident in a dark room without any music or television, and there was no evidence of staff facilitating activities that aligned with her preferences. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of structured one-on-one activities for the resident. The CNA indicated that the resident did not participate in activities outside her room and that the roommate's preferences limited the use of television or lights. The Activity Director admitted to not having a set curriculum for one-on-one activities and had not documented any such visits. Furthermore, the Activity Director did not provide a copy of the most recent Activity Assessment for the resident, indicating a lack of proper documentation and follow-through on the resident's activity needs.
Failure to Monitor and Document Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper assessment and monitoring of a resident's wounds, leading to a deficiency in care. Resident 10, who has a medical history including hemiparesis, hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure, was observed with two open areas on her right shin. These areas were initially fluid-filled blisters that had opened. Despite the presence of these wounds, there were no progress notes related to their assessment or monitoring, indicating a lapse in the facility's wound management protocol. The resident's medical record showed that a physician's order was given to apply Betadine to the open blisters and monitor them until resolved. However, the facility did not document any assessments or monitoring of the wounds until the Wound Nurse Practitioner assessed them on a later date. This lack of documentation and monitoring is contrary to the facility's policy, which requires that residents with skin impairments have appropriate interventions and treatments documented in the medical record. The deficiency was identified during a survey, highlighting the facility's failure to adhere to its own skin and wound management system.
Failure to Implement Occupational Therapy Recommendation for Resting Hand Splint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow up on an Occupational Therapy recommendation for a resting hand splint for a resident with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and unspecified dementia. The resident was observed without a splint in place, despite a previous Occupational Therapy Discharge Summary indicating the need for a resting hand splint for 5 hours a day to manage joint protection and contracture. There were no physician's orders for the splint, and the Director of Rehab was unaware of why the splint was not continued after therapy discharge. The Director of Nursing indicated that the resident's mother had been trained on the splint's use but refused its application, and there was no documentation of this refusal in the resident's record.
Deficiency in PICC Line Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice in the care of a PICC line for a resident receiving intravenous antibiotics. On observation, the resident was found with a PICC line in her right upper arm, receiving antibiotics following surgery. The resident's medical history included hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and major depressive disorder, and she was noted to be cognitively impaired. The care plan indicated the need for IV antibiotics for a urinary tract infection and specified that the PICC line should be flushed as needed or per policy. However, the physician's orders did not include instructions to flush the PICC line with saline before and after administering the antibiotic medication, which is a standard practice to maintain line patency. The Medication Administration Record showed that while the antibiotic was administered as ordered, the saline flushes were only documented once per shift, lacking evidence of flushing before and after medication administration. During an interview, the DON acknowledged that the PICC line should have been flushed before and after antibiotic administration, indicating a lapse in following the facility's policy on medication infusion.
Failure to Maintain Correct Oxygen Flow Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident by not adhering to the prescribed oxygen flow rate. Resident 22, who has chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was observed on two occasions with an incorrect oxygen flow rate. On one occasion, the oxygen concentrator was set at 2 liters per minute (lpm), and on another, it was set at 2.5 lpm, despite a physician's order from July 16, 2023, indicating the resident should receive oxygen at 3 lpm continuously. The discrepancy was noted during an observation with the Director of Nursing, who then adjusted the flow rate to the correct setting.
Incomplete Incontinence Care Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's medical record was complete and accurate regarding incontinence care logs. Resident B, who had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, heart failure, and bipolar disorder, was admitted to the facility and required assistance with toileting due to occasional incontinence of bowel and bladder. The care plan indicated that the resident needed staff assistance for various activities of daily living, including toileting. However, the January 2024 tasks showed inconsistent documentation of incontinence care, with several days missing entries and others having fewer entries than required. The Nurse Manager confirmed that documentation should have been done at least every shift, three times a day, but this was not consistently followed. During interviews, the Nurse Manager, Director of Nursing, and Administrator acknowledged the documentation lapses. The Administrator mentioned that staff had reported issues with accessing charting during their shifts, leading to the implementation of a tablet for charting. Despite this, the facility could not provide additional information to explain the incomplete records. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation related to Resident B's care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 965 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Crown Point
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Anthony | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Ignite Medical Resort Crown Point Llc | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 37 | 0 |
| Brickyard Healthcare - Merrillville Care Center | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Spring Mill Health Campus | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Lincolnshire Health & Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 38 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Colonial Nursing Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.