Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Warren Barr North Shore during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A CNA paused a resident's enteral feeding pump during cares and again when returning with another staff member to provide care. The resident had a G-tube for enteral feedings as the primary source of nutrition, and the DON stated CNAs are not allowed to operate enteral feeding pumps because they are not licensed or trained to do so.
A facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and feeding assistance to dependent residents. Two residents were found with soiled briefs containing urine and stool, with stool leakage and red buttocks/groin, while a third resident with metabolic encephalopathy and ESRD was observed eating in bed without proper positioning or feeding setup, with food scattered around the bed and coughing during the meal despite needing 1:1 feeding assistance and upright positioning.
Failure to provide ordered wound care and pressure relief interventions for residents with pressure injuries and pressure injury risk. A resident with a Stage 4 sacral wound was found with stool in the wound, a soiled dressing, and no condom catheter in place. Another resident with a heel pressure injury did not have the ordered dressing in place and was on a low air loss mattress set for the wrong weight. A third resident at high risk for pressure injuries was also on a low air loss mattress set incorrectly, with heels resting directly on the mattress instead of being offloaded.
The facility failed to keep an indwelling catheter bag below the bladder for one resident and failed to apply an ordered condom catheter for another resident. One resident’s catheter bag was observed in bed at hip level with urine backflow noted during incontinence care, despite the care plan and facility policy requiring the bag and tubing to be positioned below the bladder. Another resident with dementia, urinary incontinence, and a stage 4 sacral PI was found with a urine-soaked brief, stool contamination of the wound and dressing, and no condom catheter in place, even though a physician order and care plan required it.
Failure to provide ordered colostomy care: A cognitively intact resident with a colostomy was supposed to have the bag changed every 3 days, but the treatment record showed inconsistent documentation and the LPN denied performing a documented bag change. During observation, the resident said the bag had not been changed since returning from the hospital and reported itching and irritation around the site; she also stated she had never refused care.
Enteral feeding order not fully administered. A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, malnutrition, and a G-tube as her sole source of nutrition had ongoing weight loss while the RD increased Jevity 1.5 from 560 ml to 630 ml at 35 ml/hr. The POS and MAR still showed both the old and new orders as active, and staff signed off both orders as given. Surveyors observed the feeding running at 35 ml/hr with only 560 ml total volume hanging, and the DON confirmed the amount infused matched the old order rather than the current order.
Medication Supervision Failure: A resident had a medication cup with multiple unknown meds left on the bedside table while sleeping. The resident said staff leave meds on the table, and the LPN stated she had not yet passed meds to the resident and did not know where the meds came from. The resident’s care plan and active orders did not indicate self-administration.
A resident with a history of falls, lack of coordination, and abnormal gait did not have floor mats at the bedside as required by their care plan. Despite a recent unwitnessed fall, observations confirmed the absence of this intervention, and staff acknowledged that care plan interventions should be in place.
A resident with a history of hip replacement and infection suffered an intertrochanteric fracture after a CNA reportedly handled her roughly during a diaper change, despite her refusal. The incident was corroborated by the resident's roommate and medical records, which highlighted the need for gentle handling due to the resident's impaired mobility and pain. Previous concerns about CNA roughness during night shifts were noted in the facility's resident council minutes.
The facility failed to store liquid lorazepam according to the manufacturer's guidelines, as it was found in medication carts instead of being refrigerated. This affected four residents, with LPNs and an RN acknowledging the oversight. The facility's policy requires medications to be stored per manufacturer's instructions, which was not followed in this case.
The facility failed to provide comfortable medical equipment for two residents. One resident's wheelchair was uncomfortable, and despite complaints, no action was taken due to a lack of communication among staff. Another resident's bed was malfunctioning, causing discomfort, but the issue was not reported to maintenance. Both cases highlight a breakdown in communication and reporting processes within the facility.
A resident requiring ongoing eye injections did not have an ophthalmologist appointment scheduled in a timely manner, despite a physician's order. The resident expressed frustration over the lack of follow-through, and the facility's ward clerk admitted the task was delayed. The ophthalmologist's office confirmed no contact from the facility, and the assistant administrator acknowledged the expectation for prompt scheduling was not met.
A resident with right-sided paralysis and chronic renal disease was unsafely transferred by two CNAs using a gait belt and manual lifting, contrary to the care plan that required a mechanical aid. The resident was unable to bear weight or pivot, highlighting a failure to ensure safe transfer practices.
A resident with a history of weight loss and multiple diagnoses, including moderate protein calorie malnutrition, did not receive the ordered fortified pudding with her meals. Despite a significant weight loss over several months, the resident's lunch tray lacked the prescribed supplement. The dietitian noted the resident's tendency to sleep during meals, which may have contributed to her weight loss, and the facility's policy did not address insidious weight loss.
A resident with a history of multiple health issues, including rheumatoid arthritis and dementia, experienced significant pain during incontinence care. Despite expressing severe pain, the nursing staff failed to conduct a comprehensive pain assessment before administering pain medication. The facility's policy requires thorough pain evaluations, which were not followed in this case.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a peritoneal dialysis catheter upon admission. The resident was not identified for EBP, and staff were observed providing care without appropriate PPE. Interviews revealed that the Infection Control Preventionist and a Registered Nurse acknowledged the oversight, as the facility's policy requires EBP for residents with indwelling medical devices.
A resident with a suspected stress fracture did not receive ongoing assessments, leading to a delay in medical intervention. Despite an x-ray indicating a possible fracture, the resident's condition was not documented or assessed from 7/4 to 7/7, resulting in hospitalization for a femoral neck fracture and deep venous thrombosis. Staff interviews revealed a lack of communication and adherence to facility policies regarding changes in resident condition.
Unqualified staff operated enteral feeding pump
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a qualified staff member operated a resident's enteral feeding pump for one resident reviewed for qualified persons/staff. The resident was admitted with diagnoses of respiratory failure and dementia and had a gastrostomy tube in place for enteral feedings. The resident's current care plan showed enteral feedings were the primary source of nutrition. During observation, a CNA entered the resident's room while the enteral feeding was infusing via a pump at the bedside and paused the pump while repositioning the resident. The CNA later returned with additional staff and paused the pump again so cares could be provided. The DON stated CNAs are not allowed to operate a resident's enteral feeding pump because they are not licensed and have not been trained to do so.
Failure to Provide ADL Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide feeding assistance and incontinence care to residents who were dependent on staff for these activities of daily living. R4, admitted with respiratory failure and dementia and with a tracheostomy and gastrostomy in place, was documented as completely dependent on staff for all cares, including toileting and incontinence care. On 8/18/25, R4 was found in bed with an odor of stool in the room, and when CNA V8 and the wound nurse entered the room, R4’s brief was saturated with urine and contained a large amount of mushy stool that had leaked onto the bed. Stool was noted under the sacral dressing and in the wound, and R4’s groin and buttocks were red. V8 stated she had not yet provided incontinence care that morning and that R4 had last been changed on nights. R6 was also dependent on staff for toileting and incontinence care and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 8/18/25, CNA V6 stated he had not yet provided incontinence care that morning, and when R6’s brief was checked, liquid stool leaked out and the brief contained a large amount of urine and liquid stool; dried stool was also noted on the buttocks, which appeared bright red. R61, a Spanish-speaking resident with metabolic encephalopathy and end stage renal disease, was observed in bed eating a mechanical soft meal with her hands while food was all over the bed and items were on the floor. She was coughing, was not positioned upright, and her tray was not set up appropriately until staff were found and assisted her. Her care plan and dietary note indicated she required 1:1 feeding assistance or set-up, orientation to the plate due to blindness, and upright positioning during meals, but at the time of observation she was eating without that assistance.
Failure to Provide Ordered Wound Care and Pressure Relief
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide wound treatments and pressure-relieving interventions for residents with pressure injuries and for a resident at high risk for pressure injuries. One resident was admitted with respiratory failure and dementia, had a tracheostomy and gastrostomy, and was documented with a Stage 4 sacral pressure injury on admission. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had an order for a urinary condom catheter, and the care plan directed wound treatment as ordered and keeping wounds clean and dry. During observation, the resident remained in bed with an odor of stool in the room, had not yet received morning incontinence care, and was later found with a brief saturated with urine and stool, stool under the dressing, stool in the sacral wound, red and excoriated skin around the wound, and bleeding from the surrounding skin. No condom catheter was in place at that time. A second resident had a Stage 2 pressure injury to the left heel with an order for a bordered foam adhesive dressing to remain in place at all times and a low air loss mattress ordered as a pressure treatment intervention. The resident was observed lying on a low air loss mattress that was set for a resident weighing 200 lbs instead of the resident's recorded weight of 168.2 lbs. No dressing was present on the left heel during observation, and later only a small band-aid was noted on the heel. The wound nurse stated the mattress should be programmed to the resident's accurate weight and that the heel wound should have an adhesive dressing covering it at all times, not a band-aid. A third resident was assessed as high risk for pressure injuries and had care plan interventions for a low air loss mattress and heel offloading with a pillow or heel boots. The resident was observed on a low air loss mattress set for 250 lbs instead of the resident's recorded weight of 196 lbs, and the heels were resting directly on the mattress with no pillow under them. Heel boots were present in the room but were not being used. The facility policy stated residents with Stage III and IV pressure injuries would be placed on specialized air mattresses like a low air loss mattress, and routine daily wound care treatment or dressing changes were to be administered by the wound care nurse or designee daily.
Improper Catheter Positioning and Failure to Apply Ordered Condom Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter bag was maintained below the level of the bladder for one resident. During observation, the resident was in bed while staff provided incontinence care, and the catheter bag was unhooked and placed in the bed beside the resident at hip level, higher than the bladder, while the bag was half full of urine and urine backflow was noted. The wound NP and wound nurse were present in the room during the care, and the wound nurse later stated the catheter bag should be placed below the level of the bladder for gravity and to prevent UTI. The resident’s care plan and the facility’s indwelling catheter policy both directed that the catheter bag and tubing be positioned below the bladder region. The facility also failed to apply a condom catheter as ordered for another resident who was admitted with respiratory failure and dementia and was completely dependent on staff for all cares. The resident had a physician order for a urinary condom catheter and a care plan noting urinary incontinence and a stage 4 sacral pressure injury. During observation, the resident’s brief was saturated with urine and contained a large amount of mushy stool that had leaked onto the bed; the groin and buttocks were red, the dressing over the sacral wound was partially unsecured, stool was under the dressing and in the wound, and the surrounding skin was red, excoriated, and bleeding. No condom catheter was observed on the resident or in the brief, and a CNA later stated the resident did not have a condom catheter on. The wound nurse stated the resident had an order to wear a condom catheter to keep him dry and help his wound heal.
Failure to Provide Ordered Colostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide colostomy care to a resident as ordered and as per the resident’s preference. The resident was admitted with a colostomy in place, was cognitively intact, and had a care plan directing staff to perform ostomy care daily and as needed per physician’s order. A physician order directed that the colostomy bag be changed by staff every 3 days, and the resident’s treatment record documented a bag change on 8/9/25 and a refusal on 8/15/25. During observation on 8/18/25, the resident was seated in her room with the colostomy bag intact and stated that her bag had not been changed since returning from the hospital on 8/9/25. She reported that the skin around the site was starting to itch and become irritated, and said the bag and appliance should be changed every 3 or 4 days. She also stated that she had never refused to allow staff to change her colostomy bag. On 8/19/25, the LPN stated he never changed the resident’s colostomy bag on 8/12/25, despite the treatment record documenting that he did.
Enteral feeding order not fully administered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the required volume of enteral feeding was administered for a resident with insidious weight loss. R10’s record showed diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy placement, and her enteral feeding care plan stated that she required tube feedings via gastrostomy tube as her sole source of nutrition. Her weight record showed a decline from 121 lbs on 4/3/25 to 119.8 lbs on 5/4/25, 117.6 lbs on 6/5/25, and 115.8 lbs on 7/7/25. A dietary note by the RD documented that R10 had weight loss after a desired weight gain and increased Jevity 1.5 from 560 ml to 630 ml at 35 ml/hr until the total volume infused. However, the POS and MAR continued to show both the old 560 ml order and the updated 630 ml order as active, and the MARs from April through August 2025 showed both orders being signed off as given. During observation on 8/20/25, the tube feeding was infusing at 35 ml/hr with 430 ml infused and 130 ml remaining, and the bag had been hung the prior evening; the DON verified that this totaled 560 ml. The DON stated that when the new order was received, the old order should have been discontinued and only the current 630 ml order followed.
Medication Supervision Failure
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were supervised during administration for one resident, R26. During observation on 8/18/2025 at 9:37 AM, R26 had a medication cup on her bedside table in front of her containing multiple unknown medications, and R26 stated that staff leave medications on her table when she is sleeping. At 9:39 AM, the LPN identified as R26’s nurse stated nurses stay with residents every time to make sure the resident takes the medication and for safety reasons like choking, and said none of her residents can self-administer medications. The LPN also stated she had not yet passed medications to R26 and did not know where the medications in the cup came from, adding they could have been left by night shift. R26’s care plan dated 7/29/2025 and the active order summary as of 8/18/2025 did not list R26 as being able to self-administer medications.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident, who was at high risk for falls due to lack of coordination and abnormal gait, did not have required fall prevention interventions in place. The resident's care plan, last reviewed on 5/19/25, specified that floor mats should be provided at the bedside as a fall intervention. However, during observations on 6/11/25, no floor mats were present in the resident's room while the resident was in bed. The resident had previously experienced an unwitnessed fall on 5/29/25, as documented in the progress notes and incident report. Staff interviews confirmed that fall interventions are determined after an incident and should be implemented as listed in the care plan, but the required intervention was not in place at the time of observation.
Resident Injury Due to Rough Handling by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was repositioned safely, resulting in a significant injury. A resident, who had a history of hip replacement and was recovering from a hip joint infection, reported that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was rough while attempting to change her, despite her refusal. The resident heard a pop in her hip and subsequently experienced pain, which led to a diagnosis of an intertrochanteric fracture requiring surgery. The resident's roommate corroborated the account, stating that the resident was upset and in pain after being moved by the CNA. The resident's medical records indicated she was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and was incontinent, requiring maximum staff assistance. The facility's care plan for the resident emphasized the need for gentle handling due to her impaired mobility and pain. Despite this, the CNA reportedly attempted to change the resident multiple times against her wishes, leading to the injury. The facility's resident council minutes also noted previous concerns about the roughness of CNAs during the night shift, suggesting a pattern of behavior that may have contributed to the incident.
Improper Storage of Lorazepam
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store medications according to the manufacturer's guidelines for four residents. During an inspection, it was observed that liquid lorazepam, which requires refrigeration, was stored in the locked narcotic boxes of medication carts on both the first and second floors. Specifically, for residents R9, R12, R123, and R132, the lorazepam was not refrigerated as required. The medication for these residents was found either unopened or partially used, with dates indicating they had been stored improperly for several weeks. Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) V10 and V11, as well as Registered Nurse (RN) V15, confirmed that the lorazepam should have been refrigerated but had been stored in the medication carts instead. The facility's policy on medication storage, which mandates adherence to the manufacturer's recommendations, was not followed. The manufacturer's guide for lorazepam clearly states that it should be stored at a cold temperature, between 36 to 46 degrees Fahrenheit, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Failure to Provide Comfortable Medical Equipment for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide comfortable medical equipment for two residents, R99 and R24, as observed during the survey. R99 expressed discomfort with her wheelchair, stating that her feet did not touch the ground, making it uncomfortable to sit. Despite her complaints to the nurses and aides, no action was taken to replace the wheelchair. The staff, including the Registered Nurse, Central Supply, and Restorative Director, were unaware of R99's issue, indicating a lack of communication and follow-up on the resident's needs. R99's Minimum Data Set confirmed her cognitive intactness and dependency on staff for transfers, emphasizing the importance of having suitable equipment. R24's bed was malfunctioning, with the foot of the bed stuck in an elevated position, causing her to lay crooked. This issue was observed over multiple days by different CNAs, yet it was not reported to the Maintenance Director, who stated that any staff could report equipment issues. The Maintenance Director was unaware of the problem, highlighting a breakdown in the reporting process for maintenance issues. R24's medical history includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malnutrition, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, which necessitates proper equipment to ensure her comfort and safety.
Failure to Schedule Ophthalmologist Appointment for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to schedule a necessary ophthalmologist appointment for a resident, identified as R107, who was reviewed for quality of care. R107 had been hospitalized multiple times and required ongoing eye injections as part of her treatment. Despite a physician's order dated 9/23/24 to schedule an ophthalmologist appointment as soon as possible, the appointment had not been scheduled by 10/09/24. The resident expressed frustration over the lack of follow-through by the facility, stating that she often had to remind staff or call herself to ensure appointments were made. The physician's progress note from 9/23/24 indicated that R107 was inquiring about her appointments, highlighting the importance of these follow-ups for her ongoing care. The ward clerk/scheduler admitted that scheduling the appointment was still on her to-do list, 16 days after the order was given. The ophthalmologist's office confirmed that no appointment had been scheduled and that they had not been contacted by the facility. The assistant administrator stated that the expectation was for appointments to be scheduled within a few days of the order, which was not met in this case.
Unsafe Transfer of Resident with Hemiplegia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe transfer for a resident, identified as R95, who was reviewed for safety. R95 has a medical history that includes right-sided paralysis due to a stroke and chronic end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. On October 7, 2024, at 10:15 AM, R95 was observed being transferred from a reclined chair to his bed by two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), V13 and V14, after dialysis treatment. The CNAs used a gait belt to pull R95 into a standing position, despite R95 being unable to hold himself up and leaning towards his right side. The CNAs then placed their hands under R95's armpits to lift him to his bed, even though R95 was unable to bear weight or pivot during the transfer. R95's care plan, initiated on January 26, 2024, indicated that a mechanical aid (sling) should be used for transfers due to his high risk for falls and impaired mobility. A physical therapist, V16, confirmed that all residents should be transferred correctly for their safety.
Failure to Provide Ordered Nutritional Supplements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a resident with a history of weight loss the ordered nutritional supplements, specifically fortified pudding, as part of her dietary regimen. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including moderate protein calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, and major depressive disorder, had an order for fortified pudding twice daily with lunch and dinner. However, during an observation on October 8, 2024, the resident's lunch tray did not include the fortified pudding, which was part of her prescribed dietary plan. The resident's weight records indicated a significant weight loss over several months, with a decrease from 160.4 lbs in April 2024 to 145 lbs by October 2024. The dietitian confirmed that the resident was supposed to receive fortified pudding and ensure plus daily, but noted that the resident often slept during meal times, which could contribute to her weight loss. The facility's policy on weights did not address insidious weight loss, which may have contributed to the oversight in providing the necessary nutritional supplements to the resident.
Failure to Conduct Comprehensive Pain Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to perform a comprehensive pain assessment for a resident, identified as R24, who complained of significant pain. R24, who has a medical history including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malnutrition, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, was admitted to the facility with a care plan indicating a risk for pain related to her conditions. On two separate occasions, R24 expressed severe pain during incontinence care, rating her pain as high as 7/8 on a scale of 0-10. Despite these complaints, the nursing staff did not conduct a thorough pain assessment, including evaluating the pain's characteristics, performing a skin assessment, or assessing range of motion, before administering pain medication. On the first occasion, a CNA reported R24's pain to an RN, who administered Norco without further assessment. On the second occasion, R24 continued to express pain during care, and a Tylenol was administered by an LPN without a comprehensive assessment. The Director of Nursing later confirmed that the facility's policy requires a nurse to assess the resident's pain and perform necessary evaluations, which were not done in these instances. The facility's pain policy mandates that all residents be assessed for pain in situations where pain is likely, which was not adhered to in R24's case.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Medical Device
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an implanted medical device, specifically a peritoneal dialysis catheter, upon admission. The resident, identified as R339, was admitted with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis and a complete traumatic amputation of toes. Despite the presence of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and a surgical dressing on the left lower foot, there was no EBP sign or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) cart outside the resident's room. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed preparing to provide care without wearing a PPE gown, indicating a lapse in infection control measures. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Policy, which mandates the use of gloves and gowns during high-contact care activities for residents with indwelling medical devices. The Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) acknowledged that the resident should have been placed on EBP upon admission. Additionally, a Registered Nurse confirmed that residents with implanted medical devices should be isolated upon admission, and staff should wear gowns and gloves during care. However, there was no physician order for EBP for the resident, further highlighting the oversight in implementing necessary infection control precautions.
Failure to Provide Ongoing Assessments for Resident with Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide ongoing assessments for a resident who had an injury of unknown origin, resulting in a significant delay in appropriate medical intervention. On 7/3/24, the resident was noted to be wincing when being changed, prompting a nurse practitioner to order an x-ray, which revealed a suspicious stress fracture in the left femur. Despite this finding, there were no documented assessments of the resident's condition from 7/4/24 to 7/7/24, and the resident remained in pain and bedbound during this period. The lack of assessments and documentation continued until 7/8/24, when the resident was finally sent to the emergency room due to abnormal behavior and inability to walk. At the hospital, the resident was diagnosed with a mildly impacted and angulated left femoral neck fracture and deep venous thrombosis, conditions that had developed while the resident was under the facility's care. Interviews with staff revealed that although the resident's pain and immobility were noted, there was a failure to conduct thorough assessments or communicate changes in the resident's condition effectively. The facility's policies required notification of significant changes in a resident's condition and ongoing assessments, but these were not adhered to in this case. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of assessments and documentation, which could have identified the resident's deteriorating condition earlier. The failure to perform regular assessments and document findings contributed to the delay in addressing the resident's medical needs, ultimately leading to hospitalization and surgery.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,067 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 23 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Highland Park
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliya Of Highwood | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Whitehall Of Deerfield | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Northbrook Health And Rehab | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Lake Forest Place | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Grove Of Northbrook,the | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Warren Barr North Shore.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.