Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Vi At The Glen during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to conduct timely background checks for new admissions, affecting all reviewed residents. Background checks, including CHIRP and sex offender registry checks, were not completed within the required timeframe, with some checks conducted over a month after admission. Staff interviews revealed non-compliance with the facility's policy, which mandates checks prior to or within 72 hours of admission.
A resident with a history of anxiety and mobility issues expressed a complaint about a stained and potentially hazardous carpet in their room. Despite the complaint being made a month prior, the facility failed to document it as a grievance, violating their grievance policy. The administrator informed the resident and their family that the carpet would only be replaced at their expense.
Failure to Conduct Timely Background Checks for New Admissions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding conducting background checks for new admissions, affecting all 10 residents reviewed for admission screening. The policy requires that background checks, including checks against the state and national sex offender registries and the Criminal History Information Response Process (CHIRP), be conducted prior to or within 72 hours of admission. However, the facility did not perform these checks within the required timeframe for any of the residents reviewed, with some checks being conducted over a month after admission. The report details specific instances where the facility did not follow its policy. For example, a resident admitted with a urinary tract infection and diabetes had no CHIRP conducted upon admission, and her name was only checked in the state sex offender registry months later. Another resident with a knee prosthesis infection had her name checked in the state sex offender registry 32 days after admission, with no record of a department of corrections check. Similar lapses were noted for other residents, with delays in conducting background checks and missing checks from the department of corrections. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of adherence to the policy. The social worker responsible for conducting background checks admitted to not performing them within the required timeframe and not checking the department of corrections. The interim administrator confirmed the policy requirements but acknowledged the failure to comply. The medical director emphasized the importance of following state mandates and facility policies. The facility's policy on resident screening and abuse/neglect prevention outlines the necessary steps to protect residents, which were not followed in these cases.
Failure to Document Resident Grievance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its grievance policy by not documenting a complaint and applicable resolution made by a resident. The resident, who has a history of anxiety disorder, weakness, falling, and difficulty walking, expressed a complaint about the carpet in their room. The resident and their family had requested the carpet be replaced due to it being stained and potentially hazardous, as the resident feared tripping over it. Despite this complaint being made about a month prior, the facility did not document it as a grievance, and the administrator informed the resident and their family that the carpet would only be replaced at their expense. The facility's grievance and concern binder did not include any record of the resident's complaint. The administrator acknowledged that a grievance was not created because they did not consider it a grievance. The facility's grievance policy requires that both written and verbal complaints be documented, and a written decision regarding the grievance be provided to the resident. The failure to document the grievance and provide a written decision was a direct violation of the facility's grievance policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,384 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 24 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Glenview
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Of Glenview,the | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Glenview Terrace | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 1 |
| Elevate Care Abington | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Niles Nsg & Rehab Ctr | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Elevate Care Niles | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Vi At The Glen.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.