Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Piper City Rehab & Living Ctr during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to provide a resident with the required notice of transfer/discharge, omitting the right to appeal and contact information for advocacy agencies. The resident, with mental health diagnoses and moderate cognitive impairment, was informed of the facility's closure without receiving the necessary written notice. The omission was confirmed by the Regional Director of Operations.
A facility failed to document discharge planning for a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and mental health diagnoses during an involuntary transfer due to facility closure. Despite discussions with the resident and their family, the discharge planning was not recorded in the medical record, leading to a deficiency in the process.
A resident with dementia physically abused another resident, who is blind and on blood thinners, by punching them in the face, causing a cut. The incident occurred during the night shift when the aggressor became agitated over perceived preferential treatment. The facility's policy on abuse prevention was not effectively implemented, resulting in a failure to protect the resident from harm.
The facility failed to employ a DON and did not provide RN services for eight consecutive hours daily, affecting all 36 residents. The Assistant DON confirmed the absence of a DON and inconsistent RN coverage. The nursing schedule documented multiple days without the required RN coverage, contrary to the facility's policy of maintaining 24/7 RN availability.
A facility failed to implement fall interventions and provide supervision for a resident at risk for falls, resulting in a hip fracture requiring surgery. Despite multiple falls and a care plan for 15-minute safety checks, there was no documentation of these checks being conducted. Observations showed the absence of a floor cushion, and staff were unaware of the need for fall mats, contrary to the facility's fall prevention policy.
The facility failed to address significant weight loss in three residents, leading to deficiencies in their nutritional care. One resident lost 24.68% of their weight over six months due to the facility's failure to implement the dietician's recommendations and notify relevant parties. Another resident's weight dropped from 150 to 122 pounds, with the facility not providing the recommended supplements. A third resident experienced an 11.87% weight loss, with the facility not following dietary recommendations. These failures resulted in significant nutritional deficiencies.
The facility failed to employ a DON for over a year and did not provide RN services for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week, potentially affecting all 36 residents. The nursing schedule showed gaps in RN coverage, and an LPN confirmed the absence of a DON and verified the schedule's accuracy. The facility's policy requires 24/7 RN coverage to ensure resident safety.
The facility failed to maintain proper food safety and sanitation standards, affecting all 36 residents. Unlabeled and expired items were found in an unclean refrigerator, and a greasy range hood had not been tested due to payment issues. A resident consumed moldy bread, highlighting lapses in food safety monitoring.
The facility did not ensure that key personnel, including the Administrator, DON, Infection Preventionist, and Medical Director, attended the required quarterly QAA committee meetings. This absence was confirmed by the Resident Care Coordinator, potentially affecting all 36 residents in the facility.
The facility failed to have an onsite certified Infection Preventionist working at least part-time, potentially affecting all 36 residents. The Resident Care Coordinator confirmed the absence of a part-time Infection Preventionist, with the Regional Nurse only filling in occasionally. Facility documents highlight the need for an Infection Control and Preventionist.
The facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications for four residents, as required by their policy. Residents with conditions such as Bipolar Disorder, Dementia, and Depression were administered medications like Nortriptyline, Effexor, and Quetiapine without documented consent. The oversight was acknowledged by staff, indicating a systemic issue in consent documentation.
A resident's medications were not administered according to physician's orders and within the designated time frame, resulting in a 44% medication error rate. An LPN administered the resident's 6:00 AM medications too early, and the facility was out of Risperdal, leading to a missed dose. The resident had multiple medications for conditions like anemia and epilepsy, and the facility's policy allows for administration within one hour before and after the scheduled time.
A resident with Autism and other conditions missed five out of six doses of Risperdal due to the facility running out of the medication. This led to increased autistic-related behaviors. The issue was linked to improper handling of the medication bottle, causing spillage, and a denied refill request by insurance.
The facility failed to provide written Notices of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for three residents who had leftover Medicare days when discharged from services. During a survey, it was found that the facility did not have any NOMNC notices available, and the Social Services Director could not locate them. The Administrator confirmed the absence of these notices, indicating a lapse in the documentation process for Medicare coverage notifications.
A facility failed to provide routine showers for a resident diagnosed with Cerebral Infarction and other conditions, who is dependent on staff for showering. Despite the facility's policy for weekly showers, the resident reported not receiving showers twice a week as preferred, with records indicating ten missed showers over a period. The Resident Care Coordinator confirmed the issue was due to staff call-offs, leading to insufficient staff to assist.
A facility failed to notify a physician or update the care plan for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The resident, with multiple diagnoses including cognitive decline and diabetes, had a pressure ulcer on the right heel that was not documented or treated. An LPN discovered the ulcer during an observation, and the care plan lacked necessary interventions, contrary to the facility's policy.
The facility failed to obtain ordered urinalysis tests for two residents due to a lack of proper collection tubes. Despite the arrival of specimen cups, the staff did not send the urinalysis for one resident, while the other resident's urine specimen showed organisms growing, and the facility awaited further physician orders. The Resident Care Coordinator acknowledged the issue and the residents' need for better care.
Two residents experienced deficiencies in oxygen therapy care. One resident had outdated oxygen tubing and water, contrary to weekly change orders, while another had an empty humidification bottle and incorrect oxygen flow rate. Both cases involved non-compliance with physician orders and facility policy.
A facility failed to label an open insulin pen with the date it was first opened, as required for medications with shortened expiration dates. An LPN was observed preparing an Admelog insulin pen for a resident without the necessary date, which was confirmed by the LPN and the Resident Care Coordinator. The facility's policy mandates dating such medications to ensure proper usage.
The facility failed to provide the correct consistency for pureed diets for three residents. The policy requires pureed food to be smooth and pudding-like, but the pureed ham served contained chunks, posing a choking risk. The dietary manager and dietician confirmed the inconsistency and the potential hazard.
Failure to Provide Adequate Transfer/Discharge Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate notice prior to the transfer or discharge of a resident, specifically omitting the resident's right to an appeal and the necessary contact information for advocacy and protection agencies. The facility's policy, revised in October 2022, mandates that all written notices of transfer or discharge include these details. However, the Notice of Closure letter sent to residents and their families did not contain this critical information. This oversight was identified in the case of a resident with a history of mental health issues, including Bipolar Disorder and Anxiety Disorder, who was discharged without receiving the required notice. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was informed of the facility's closure by the Regional Director of Operations. Despite the resident's request to involve their family in the decision-making process, there was no documentation that the family received the necessary written notice, including the right to appeal and contact information for advocacy agencies. The Social Services Director confirmed that corporate staff discussed the closure with residents and families, but the Regional Director of Operations acknowledged the omission of critical information in the written notice provided to the resident and their family.
Failure to Document Discharge Planning for Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document coordination of discharge planning for a resident (R4) who was subject to involuntary transfer due to the facility's planned closure. The facility's closure and relocation plan indicated that they would meet with residents and their representatives to discuss alternative placements and assist with transfers. However, there was a lack of documented communication and coordination with R4 and their family (V11) regarding discharge planning. R4, who had moderate cognitive impairment and a history of Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Cognitive Communication Deficit, was anxious about leaving the facility, as they had resided there for a long time. The facility's records show that the Regional Director of Operations met with R4 to discuss the closure, but subsequent communication with R4's family was not documented until a voicemail was left on 11/13/24. The Social Services Director and Resident Care Coordinator confirmed that discharge planning was not documented in R4's medical record, despite discussions with R4's family about potential placements. Ultimately, R4 was transferred to a sister facility, but the lack of documented discharge planning and coordination with the resident and their family constitutes a deficiency in the facility's discharge planning process.
Failure to Protect Resident from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident, R2, from physical abuse by another resident, R1. R1, who suffers from severe cognitive impairment due to dementia, punched R2 in the face, resulting in a cut above R2's eye. This incident occurred during the night shift when R1 became agitated after using the restroom and accused R2 of receiving too much attention from the nursing staff. R2, who is blind and on blood thinners, was unable to see the attack coming and subsequently bled from the injury. The incident was reported to the local sheriff's department, and a police report was filed. The report details that R2 informed the responding deputy that R1 hit R2 because R1 was upset about the attention R2 was receiving from the nurses. R1 admitted to the deputy that R1 hit R2, but due to R1's dementia, R1 was unable to provide a coherent explanation for the behavior. The facility's Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was informed of the incident and conducted interviews with the staff involved, confirming the details of the event. The facility's policy on 'Abuse Prevention and Reporting' emphasizes the residents' right to be free from abuse and outlines the facility's commitment to preventing such occurrences. Despite this policy, the facility did not prevent the physical abuse of R2 by R1, highlighting a failure in ensuring a safe environment for its residents. The staff's response involved removing R1 from the room and administering first aid to R2, but the initial failure to prevent the abuse remains a significant concern.
Failure to Maintain Required RN Coverage and Employ a DON
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a Director of Nursing (DON) and did not provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week, which has the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. On a specific date, the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility had been without a DON for a long time and lacked consistent RN coverage. The nursing working schedule from the beginning to the end of the month documented multiple days where the facility did not have RN coverage for the required hours. The facility's policy stated the need for RN coverage 24/7 to ensure resident safety and compliance with regulations, but this was not adhered to as per the documented schedule.
Failure to Implement Fall Interventions and Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement resident-centered fall interventions and provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall for a resident identified as R187. Despite being at risk for falls due to multiple health conditions, including altered mental status and age-related cognitive decline, the facility did not initiate specific fall interventions following several falls. The resident experienced multiple falls, with the most recent resulting in a fractured hip that required hospitalization and surgical repair. The care plan included a 15-minute safety check intervention, but there was no documentation to support that these checks were initiated after the resident's readmission from hip surgery. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident did not have a floor cushion in place as recommended, and staff were unaware of the need for fall mats. The facility's fall prevention policy requires staff to observe residents for safety and document any new interventions following a fall. However, the policy was not followed, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and implementation of necessary interventions. The failure to adhere to the policy and provide adequate supervision contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss in Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately monitor and address significant weight loss in three residents, leading to deficiencies in their nutritional care. Resident R23 experienced a 24.68% weight loss over six months, with the facility failing to implement the dietician's recommendations for nutritional supplements and not notifying the physician, dietician, or resident's representatives of the weight loss. The dietician noted that the facility did not provide accurate monthly weights, which hindered her ability to assess residents properly. Despite recommendations for increased nutritional support, the facility did not follow through, contributing to R23's continued weight loss. Resident R28 also suffered from weight loss, dropping from 150 pounds in March to 122 pounds in July. The facility did not implement the dietician's recommendation for a two-calorie supplement, and during an observation, R28 did not receive the prescribed protein at breakfast. The dietary manager confirmed that the supplement had not been provided, and the dietician expressed concern that the lack of supplementation could contribute to further weight loss. Resident R16 experienced a weight loss of 11.87% over six months. The dietician had recommended supplemental shakes and a med pass to address the weight loss, but these were not provided during observed meals. The dietician confirmed that the failure to follow dietary recommendations likely contributed to R16's ongoing weight loss. The facility's inability to document accurate weights and implement dietary interventions as recommended by the dietician resulted in significant nutritional deficiencies for these residents.
Failure to Maintain RN Coverage and Employ a DON
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a Director of Nursing (DON) for over a year and did not provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. This deficiency potentially affects all 36 residents residing in the facility. The resident roster dated July 14, 2024, confirms the presence of 36 residents. The nursing working schedule from July 1, 2024, to July 14, 2024, shows that the facility lacked RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on July 3, 5, 9, and 12, 2024. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the absence of a DON for about a year and verified the accuracy of the RN coverage documentation. The facility's policy, which is undated, states that RN coverage should be available 24/7 to ensure the health and safety of residents, in accordance with Illinois Department of Public Health regulations.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper food safety and sanitation standards, which could potentially affect all 36 residents. Observations revealed that refrigerated items, including chocolate syrup, ice cream toppings, a glass of milk, and a cup of sour cream, were not labeled with dates, and five packs of string cheese were expired. The refrigerator storing these items was found to be unclean, with dried spillage and old debris. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the issue and stated that the items had been disposed of and the refrigerator cleaned. Additionally, the range hood in the kitchen was observed to be greasy with dust and debris, and it had not been tested since a previous date due to a lack of payment to the fire suppression company responsible for its maintenance. A resident was observed eating a piece of moldy bread at the breakfast table, having consumed half of the slice before the mold was noticed. The Dietician confirmed that she had previously discarded moldy bread during a kitchen evaluation. The facility's Kitchen Sanitation policy mandates compliance with public health standards and the development of a cleaning schedule, while the Food Safety bulletin requires that expired food or beverages be discarded immediately and that all items be labeled and dated for safety monitoring.
Failure to Ensure Required Attendance at QAA Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the required personnel attended the quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings, which are essential for maintaining and improving safety and quality within the facility. The QAPI Committee, as documented in the facility's agenda plan, should include the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Infection Preventionist, and Medical Director. However, the review of the meeting sign-in sheets for the past year revealed that these key members were absent from multiple meetings. Specifically, on three separate occasions, the Administrator, Director of Nurses, Infection Preventionist, and Medical Director were not present as required. This absence was confirmed by the Resident Care Coordinator, who verified the signatures and acknowledged the non-attendance of the necessary committee members. This deficiency has the potential to impact all 36 residents residing in the facility.
Lack of Onsite Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate an onsite certified Infection Preventionist who works at least part-time, which has the potential to affect all 36 residents. During the survey conducted from July 14 to July 16, 2024, it was observed that there was no Infection Preventionist working part-time in the facility. On July 15, 2024, the Resident Care Coordinator confirmed that the facility had not employed a part-time certified Infection Preventionist for a long time. The Regional Nurse occasionally fills in but is only present two days a month, which is insufficient to fulfill the Infection Preventionist duties part-time. The facility assessment and the Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid both document the need for an Infection Control and Preventionist to provide competent support and care for the resident population.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications for four residents, as required by their Psychotropic Medication Policy. The policy mandates that psychotropic medications should not be prescribed or administered without the informed consent of the resident, their guardian, or an authorized representative. Additionally, the policy requires behavior tracking for residents receiving such medications. However, the facility did not adhere to these requirements for residents diagnosed with various mental health conditions, including Bipolar Disorder, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Depression, and other psychiatric disorders. Resident R18 was receiving Nortriptyline and Lamotrigine for Bipolar Disorder without consent until it was obtained belatedly. Similarly, R25 was administered Effexor and Lexapro for Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances and Depression without prior consent. R2's medical records lacked documentation of consent for Zolpidem Tartrate, Quetiapine, and Lorazepam, which were being administered. Lastly, R24's consents for Quetiapine, Clonazepam, and Trazodone were not located, and the Social Services Director acknowledged the oversight. These lapses indicate a systemic issue in obtaining and documenting informed consent for psychotropic medications.
Medication Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medications in accordance with physician's orders and within the designated time frame for a resident reviewed for medication administration. The facility's policy allows for medication administration within a window of one hour before and after the scheduled time. However, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered the resident's 6:00 AM medications via a gastrostomy tube before 5:00 AM, which is outside the allowed time frame. Additionally, the facility did not have the resident's Risperdal medication available, resulting in a missed dose at 12:00 PM. The resident in question had multiple medications prescribed for conditions including anemia, seizures, epilepsy, and behaviors related to autistic disorder. The medication administration record indicated that all medications were scheduled for 6:00 AM. On the day of the survey, the LPN confirmed administering the medications too early and acknowledged the absence of Risperdal, which was not administered at the scheduled time due to being out of stock. The staff member responsible for coordinating resident care stated that in such cases, the pharmacy should be contacted immediately, and if the medication cannot be refilled, the physician should be notified.
Significant Medication Error Due to Insufficient Risperdal Supply
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as R33, was free from significant medication errors. R33, who has diagnoses including Autism, Epilepsy, and Traumatic Brain Hemorrhage, was prescribed Risperdal to manage behaviors associated with Autism. However, the Medication Administration Record revealed that R33 missed five out of six scheduled doses of Risperdal over a three-day period. This lapse in medication administration coincided with increased autistic-related behaviors, as R33 was observed hollering loudly on multiple occasions. The deficiency was attributed to the facility running out of Risperdal, as confirmed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who stated that the medication was unavailable and that the pharmacy had been contacted for more. The Consultant Pharmacist noted that missing doses would increase R33's irritability. The Dispensing Pharmacist indicated that a 30 ml bottle of Risperdal had been sent and should have lasted 13 days, but an electronic request for a refill was denied by insurance as it was too soon. The Resident Care Coordinator suggested that the medication was running out because staff were not securing the bottle cap properly, leading to spillage.
Failure to Provide Medicare Non-Coverage Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for three residents who were reviewed for Medicare Non-Coverage notices. This deficiency was identified during a survey where it was found that the facility did not have any NOMNC notices available for these residents, despite them having leftover Medicare days when discharged from Medicare services. The Social Services Director was unable to locate any NOMNC notices in the building, and the Administrator confirmed that the notices were not available. This issue was identified through interviews and record reviews, highlighting a lapse in the facility's documentation process for Medicare coverage notifications.
Failure to Provide Routine Showers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide routine showers for a resident, identified as R12, who was reviewed for showers in a sample list of 30. According to the facility's Bath/Shower Policy dated January 2018, all residents are scheduled to receive at least one shower weekly, with staff required to report any pertinent observations or refusals to the Charge Nurse. R12, who is diagnosed with Cerebral Infarction, Seizures, Aphasia, Hemiplegia Right Side, and Unsteadiness of Feet, is cognitively intact and dependent on staff for showering. R12 reported not receiving showers twice a week as preferred, with staff either not offering or stating unavailability to assist. Records from 5/6/24 through 7/15/24 show R12 missed ten scheduled showers. The Resident Care Coordinator confirmed that showers were not completed due to staff call-offs, resulting in insufficient staff to assist, and acknowledged that R12's showers were scheduled for Tuesdays and Fridays, which should align with resident preferences.
Failure to Notify Physician and Update Care Plan for Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician or seek treatment orders for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The resident, identified as R187, had a care plan updated on 6/29/24, which included diagnoses such as altered mental status, age-related cognitive decline, chronic kidney disease stage III, type II diabetes with polyneuropathy, depression, and anxiety. On 7/14/24, a roommate of the resident mentioned a sore on R187's right heel. A progress note from 7/13/24 documented the resident's arrival via ambulance and noted a pressure ulcer starting on the left heel, but there was no documentation of physician notification or treatment orders for the pressure ulcer. On 7/15/24, an LPN observed the resident in bed with heel protectors and discovered a purple unstageable pressure ulcer on the right heel, which was not previously documented. The LPN was unaware of the ulcer, and the resident's care plan did not include interventions for the pressure ulcer. The facility's policy on pressure ulcer prevention requires that skin risk and appropriate interventions be included in the care plan, and if a pressure ulcer develops, the care plan must be updated with interventions for healing and prevention. However, this was not done for R187.
Failure to Obtain Ordered Urinalysis Tests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain ordered urinalysis tests for two residents, R22 and R34, who were reviewed for urinary tract infections. For R22, a physician's order for a urinalysis test was documented on 7/9/24. However, the progress notes on the same date indicated that the nurse was unable to obtain the specimen due to the lack of proper collection tubes on site. Despite the arrival of specimen cups on 7/12/24, the staff failed to send the urinalysis. As of 7/16/24, the specimen had still not been sent, as confirmed by the Resident Care Coordinator. Similarly, for R34, a physician's order for a urinalysis test was documented on 7/11/24. The progress notes indicated an attempt to collect the specimen, but proper tubes were not available in the facility. Although a urine specimen dated 7/12/24 showed organisms growing, the facility was still waiting for the physician to order an antibiotic based on the culture as of 7/16/24. The Resident Care Coordinator acknowledged the facility's dependency on the laboratory for supplies and expressed that the residents deserve better care.
Oxygen Therapy Deficiencies for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its own Oxygen Therapy Policy, which mandates that oxygen tubing, masks, and cannulas be changed weekly and dated. For one resident, identified as R22, the oxygen tubing and water were observed to be dated 7/2/24, despite the physician's order requiring weekly changes every Friday on the night shift. This discrepancy was confirmed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who acknowledged that the tubing and water should be changed weekly. R22's medical history includes pneumonia, cognitive communication deficit, and hypoxemia, among other conditions, and the resident was receiving oxygen therapy at 1 liter per nasal cannula nightly. Another resident, R6, also experienced deficiencies in oxygen care. The treatment sheet indicated a physician's order for oxygen tubing and humidifier changes every Monday night shift, with a continuous oxygen flow of 3 liters per nasal cannula. However, the oxygen humidification bottle was found empty and dated 6/30/24, and the tubing was visibly dirty with white crust on the nasal tubes, lacking a date for the last change. Additionally, the oxygen flow was incorrectly set to 2 liters instead of the prescribed 3 liters.
Failure to Label Insulin Pen with Open Date
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly label an open insulin pen with the date it was first opened, which is a requirement for medications with shortened expiration dates. This deficiency was identified during an observation of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) preparing an Admelog insulin pen for a resident, referred to as R18, who was prescribed the medication for diabetes management. The insulin pen, which had already been opened and used, lacked a date indicating when it was first opened, contrary to the facility's policy and pharmacy's insulin storage recommendations. The incident was confirmed by the LPN during the observation and further verified when the insulin pen was found inside a medication cart without a date. The Resident Care Coordinator, also an LPN, acknowledged that nurses are supposed to date insulin pens upon opening. The facility's policy, revised in 2013, mandates that staff should enter the date opened on the label of medications with shortened expiration dates, such as insulin, to ensure proper storage and usage within the recommended timeframe.
Failure to Provide Correct Pureed Diet Consistency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the correct consistency for a pureed diet for three residents who were reviewed for pureed diets. According to the facility's policy dated October 2012, pureed food should be blended to a smooth, pudding-like consistency. However, during an observation on July 14, 2024, the cook stated that the pureed ham was ready to serve, but upon testing, it was found to contain chunks of ham. The dietary manager confirmed the presence of chunks and acknowledged that the food needed to be corrected to prevent choking hazards. The dietician also emphasized the importance of maintaining a pudding consistency to avoid choking or aspiration.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 47 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Piper City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilman Healthcare Center | 9.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Prairieview Lutheran Home | 11.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 1 |
| Fairview Haven | 17.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| La Bella At Clifton | 17.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Accolade Hc Of Paxton On Pells | 21 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Piper City Rehab & Living Ctr.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.