Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Oakview Nursing & Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to follow EBP during suprapubic catheter care was cited for one resident with severe cognitive impairment, CKD, DM2, and an indwelling catheter. Two CNAs were observed providing catheter care with gloves but without gowns, and one CNA did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between cleaning steps. The resident had orders for EBP and for cleansing around the suprapubic catheter site, and the DON confirmed the gown and hand hygiene were required.
A CNA was hired without verification of continuous employment or current certification, as required by the Health Care Worker Registry. The CNA had a break in her career and worked as a private sitter, not as a CNA, and was unaware of any lapse in certification. Facility staff were not aware of the lapse, and no documentation was found to confirm the CNA's eligibility or work history as required.
A resident with neurocognitive disorder and mobility dependence suffered a leg laceration requiring sutures after bumping into a grab bar missing a safety cap during a transfer. The facility's investigation identified the missing cap as a hazard, leading to the injury.
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for residents on weekends, as confirmed by resident interviews and staff statements. Despite planned activities on the calendar, residents reported a lack of engagement, with some only receiving coloring sheets occasionally. The interim Activities Director indicated CNAs should ensure weekend activities, but a CNA reported no activity staff presence and insufficient time to conduct activities, resulting in residents sitting in front of the TV.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS coding for three residents, leading to discrepancies in assessments. One resident's MDS inaccurately documented no serious mental illness despite PASRR Level II documentation indicating otherwise. Another resident's MDS incorrectly indicated no serious mental illness, and a third resident's MDS inaccurately recorded insulin injections without a physician order. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged these errors.
A facility failed to complete a Level II PASRR for a resident with a bipolar disorder diagnosis. The resident was admitted with unspecified dementia and later diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Despite active medication orders for the condition, the facility did not contact the PASRR agency for a Level II screening, as required by their policy.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including joint disorders and lumbar disc displacement, did not receive necessary range of motion exercises for her lower extremities. Despite documented impairments and dependency on assistance, the resident's care plan lacked focus on preventing decline, and she was not receiving restorative nursing services. CNAs were unclear about their role in providing these exercises, and the Rehabilitation Director confirmed the absence of restorative services for the resident's lower body.
A facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. The resident, with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder, was on Ativan, Buspirone, and Escitalopram. Despite a pharmacist's recommendation for dose reduction, the physician disagreed, citing stability. The resident expressed uncertainty about the necessity of Buspirone, and CNAs reported no regular behaviors warranting these medications. The facility's policy requires psychotropic medications only when necessary, but there was no evidence of gradual dose reduction or non-pharmacological interventions.
The facility failed to provide meals at a palatable temperature for residents who chose to eat in their rooms. Three cognitively intact residents reported receiving cold meals, with one noting delays in tray distribution. The issue was raised in Resident Council meetings, but the Dietary Manager was unaware of the ongoing problem, and promised solutions, such as ordering plate covers, were not implemented. The facility's policy requires hot foods to be served at 120°F or greater, but this standard was not consistently met.
The facility failed to ensure resident safety during transportation and transfers, resulting in a serious injury when a resident fell from a transport van. Additionally, the facility did not consistently use two staff members for mechanical lift transfers, as required by policy, due to staffing shortages. Furthermore, fall prevention measures were not implemented for a resident with a history of falls, as non-skid strips were not placed as planned.
The facility failed to provide sufficient staffing, resulting in delayed care and improper transfers for residents. One resident with severe cognitive deficits was not repositioned timely, leading to skin issues. Another resident experienced long wait times for assistance, resulting in incontinence episodes and improper transfers with only one staff member using a mechanical lift. Staff confirmed that having only one CNA per hall was insufficient to meet residents' needs.
The facility failed to provide adequate hot water in the shower rooms on the 200 and 500 halls, affecting residents who require assistance with showers. Water temperatures were found to be below required levels, and the Maintenance Director acknowledged ongoing issues with maintaining adequate temperatures. Two residents reported inconsistent water temperatures, leading to the need for showers on other halls, which they found degrading. Staff confirmed the inconsistency of hot water availability.
A facility investigation revealed misappropriation of funds affecting multiple residents, with discrepancies totaling $5,124.97. The former Administrator admitted to taking funds, and both the Administrator and Business Office Manager were implicated in payroll fraud. Despite the breach, some residents expressed no concerns about their funds being taken and replaced.
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and ensure the availability of shampoo/body wash for residents. Multiple residents reported delays in receiving assistance for toileting hygiene, leading to incontinence episodes. Staff interviews confirmed that staffing shortages contributed to these delays. Additionally, the facility lacked essential hygiene supplies, with observations revealing insufficient shampoo and body wash in storage areas and resident rooms.
A resident with severe cognitive deficits and a history of playful slapping was involved in an incident where he slapped the Activities Director, who then tapped him on the shoulder. The facility's investigation found the action inappropriate, despite no harm being intended. The resident's care plan acknowledges his behavior, but the facility's abuse prevention policy led to the determination of a deficiency in protecting the resident from physical abuse.
A resident reported missing money on two occasions, but the facility failed to report the allegation to the Administrator as required by policy. Despite the resident's cognitive intactness and reporting to staff, the Regional Director of Operations found no investigations related to the incident. The facility replaced part of the missing funds, but the lack of proper reporting constitutes a deficiency.
The facility failed to prevent pressure ulcers and maintain hand hygiene for three residents. One resident with severe cognitive deficits was left in a wheelchair for too long, leading to a non-blanching red area on the hip. Another resident with an unstageable pressure ulcer received treatment without proper hand hygiene by an LPN. A third resident was reportedly left in a wheelchair for up to 12 hours, causing exhaustion. The facility's policies on pressure ulcer prevention and hand hygiene were not followed.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Suprapubic Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program was cited after staff failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during suprapubic catheter care for one resident. The resident had an admission date of 6/1/2018 and diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, uninhibited neuropathic bladder, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The resident's MDS documented a BIMS score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and identified an indwelling catheter. The physician orders included enhanced barrier precautions related to the suprapubic catheter and instructions to cleanse around the insertion site with soap and water nightly and as needed, replace the split sponge, and secure tape. During observation, an enhanced barrier precaution sign was posted on the resident's door directing staff to wear gloves and a gown for high-contact care activities including urinary catheter care. Two CNAs were observed providing suprapubic catheter care while wearing gloves but not gowns. One CNA moved the resident's blanket for catheter care and did not doff gloves or perform hand hygiene. That CNA then used multiple washcloths to clean the suprapubic area and catheter, discarding each washcloth, but did not doff gloves or complete hand hygiene between steps. The second CNA used a clean towel to clean the catheter. The CNA later stated she should have worn a gown and should have changed gloves and completed hand hygiene per policy, and the DON stated the CNA should have worn a gown and completed hand hygiene during the care.
Failure to Verify CNA Certification and Work History
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was properly certified and eligible to work by verifying continuous employment on the Health Care Worker Registry. The staff roster showed that the CNA, identified as V11, was hired by the facility, and the registry check indicated work eligibility. However, the registry also stated that employers are responsible for verifying training, work history, and certifications. There was no documentation confirming V11's employment as a CNA after a certain date, and V11 herself reported a break in her CNA career to be a stay-at-home parent, during which she worked as a private sitter in a home setting, not as a CNA. V11 was unaware of any lapse in her certification. Interviews with facility staff, including the Administrator, Director of Nurses, and Medical Records/Office Assistant, revealed that none were aware of any certified staff working without proper certification. The Administrator and Medical Records/Office Assistant described their process for background and registry checks but could not confirm that V11's employment history as a CNA was verified prior to her hiring. An email from the Health Care Worker Registry indicated that V11's CNA certification had expired and that her work history was missing from the registry. The facility was unable to provide proof of V11's employment as a CNA during the period in question.
Resident Injured Due to Missing Safety Cap on Grab Bar
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards, resulting in a resident acquiring a laceration on her left lower leg that required 12 sutures. The resident, who had been diagnosed with neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, weakness, and unspecified diastolic heart failure, was dependent on assistance for mobility. During a transfer from her bed to a wheelchair, the resident's leg was injured by a sharp edge of a grab bar that was missing a safety cap. The resident's care plan had identified potential impairments to skin integrity and a risk for falls or injury due to various conditions, including weakness and unsteady gait. Despite these documented risks, the grab bar in the resident's room was not adequately maintained, leading to the injury. The incident occurred when two CNAs were transferring the resident, and the sharp edge of the grab bar caused two lacerations on her leg. The facility's investigation revealed that the grab bar was missing a black safety cap, which left a sharp area exposed. This environmental hazard was identified as a predisposing factor for the injury. The incident was reported, and the resident was sent to a local hospital for treatment, where the lacerations were sutured. The facility acknowledged the need for repair and maintenance of the grab bar to prevent such accidents in the future.
Inadequate Weekend Activities for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for residents, particularly on weekends, as evidenced by interviews and record reviews. Four residents, all cognitively intact and alert, expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of activities during weekends. One resident specifically mentioned that sometimes they receive coloring sheets, but not consistently every weekend. During a resident council meeting, multiple residents confirmed the lack of weekend activities, despite the absence of documented complaints in the council minutes over the past year. The president of the resident council contradicted this, stating that complaints about the lack of activities are made every month. The interim Activities Director, who is also the Social Services staff, stated that CNAs are responsible for ensuring activities are offered on weekends. However, a CNA working on a recent weekend reported that there were no activity staff present and that she was not asked to conduct activities, nor did she have time to do so. The activities calendar for January 2025 listed several activities planned for the weekend, but these were not carried out, as residents were observed sitting in front of the TV instead. This indicates a disconnect between planned activities and their execution, leading to the deficiency in providing adequate resident engagement.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) coding for three residents, leading to discrepancies in their assessments. For one resident, the MDS inaccurately documented that the resident was not considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness, despite the PASRR Level II documentation indicating otherwise. This resident had a history of serious mental illnesses, including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, which were not accurately reflected in the MDS. Similarly, another resident's MDS incorrectly indicated no serious mental illness, despite PASRR Level II documentation confirming a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged these discrepancies during interviews. Additionally, a third resident's MDS inaccurately recorded that the resident received insulin injections, despite no physician order for insulin and the resident's statement of never having been diagnosed with diabetes or receiving insulin. The MDS Coordinator admitted to the error in the MDS entry. The facility's policy requires the Assessment Coordinator to ensure accurate resident assessments and submission to CMS' Quality Improvement and Evaluation System, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Complete Level II PASRR for Resident with Bipolar Disorder
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for a resident diagnosed with a mental disorder. The resident, identified as R23, was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and bipolar disorder. The bipolar disorder diagnosis was added on 8/28/2024, and the resident's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 11/18/2024 confirmed this diagnosis. Despite the presence of a psychiatric/mood disorder diagnosis and active medication orders for bipolar disorder, the facility did not provide evidence that the PASRR agency was contacted for a Level II screening. The Business Office Manager acknowledged the oversight, noting that the resident should have been referred for the screening. The facility's policy requires that new or changed behaviors indicating a serious mental disorder be referred for a PASRR Level II evaluation, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Maintain Range of Motion for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the range of motion for a resident, identified as R52, who was admitted with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, joint disorders, morbid obesity, and lumbar disc displacement. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated impairments in both lower extremities and a dependency on assistance for various self-care and mobility tasks. Despite these documented needs, the resident reported that no exercises or passive range of motion activities were conducted for her lower extremities, and she was not receiving any restorative nursing services for this purpose. The resident expressed that occupational therapy focused only on her upper extremities due to carpal tunnel syndrome, and she had not been engaged in any lower body exercises. Interviews with Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) revealed a lack of clarity regarding the responsibility for providing range of motion exercises, with CNAs assuming that restorative nursing handled these tasks. However, the Rehabilitation Director confirmed that the resident was not receiving restorative services for her lower extremities. Additionally, the resident's care plan lacked focus on limited range of motion or exercises to prevent decline, and there were no orders for restorative nursing. The facility's policy on resident mobility and range of motion emphasized the need for treatment and services to prevent avoidable decline, yet these were not implemented for the resident in question.
Failure to Ensure Resident is Free from Unnecessary Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as R52, was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. R52 was admitted with diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The resident's medication regimen included Ativan, Buspirone, and Escitalopram, with the latter two medications having been started prior to admission. Despite a recommendation from a consultant pharmacist to assess the risk versus benefit and consider a dose reduction of these medications, the attending physician disagreed, citing the resident's stability. The resident expressed uncertainty about the necessity of Buspirone and noted that she had not been on anti-anxiety medication before admission. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication use and reduction emphasizes that such medications should only be used when necessary and effective for specific conditions. However, interviews with CNAs revealed that R52 did not regularly exhibit behaviors warranting the use of these medications. Additionally, the resident's care plan included non-pharmacological interventions, but there was no evidence of a gradual dose reduction or exploration of these alternatives. The lack of documented behaviors and the resident's own statements suggest that the facility did not adequately justify the continued use of psychotropic medications, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Serve Meals at Palatable Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide meals at a palatable temperature for residents who chose to eat in their rooms. Three residents, all of whom were cognitively intact, reported that their meals were often delivered cold. One resident mentioned that it sometimes took over 20 minutes for the nursing staff to distribute the trays after they were delivered to the hallway. Another resident expressed reluctance to ask staff to reheat her food, as she did not want to bother them. The issue of cold food was also raised in Resident Council meetings, with residents noting that meals were not warm when served in the hallways. The Dietary Manager was unaware of the ongoing issue, despite having previously informed the Resident Council that plate covers would be ordered to address the problem. However, these covers were never ordered, and the trays continued to be covered with foil, using open, non-insulated carts for delivery. The facility's policy on in-room dining specifies that hot foods should be served at 120 degrees Fahrenheit or greater to ensure palatability, but this standard was not consistently met. The Social Services representative confirmed that residents had decided to ask staff to reheat meals if they were too cold, indicating a lack of effective resolution to the problem.
Deficiencies in Resident Safety and Transfer Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safety of residents during transportation and transfers, resulting in serious injury. One resident, identified as R9, fell backwards out of a transport van onto the concrete, leading to fractures in her back. The incident occurred because the transportation aide did not engage the ramp to the van exit door before attempting to unload the resident. The aide assumed another staff member had raised the lift, which was not the case, leading to the resident being pushed out of the van and sustaining injuries. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to its policy of using two staff members for transfers involving a mechanical lift. Residents R3 and R4 reported instances where only one staff member was present during their transfers, which is against the facility's policy. This was corroborated by several CNAs who admitted to transferring residents alone due to staffing shortages. The Director of Nursing was unaware of this practice until it was brought to her attention, indicating a lack of oversight and communication within the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for resident R8, who had a history of falls and a fracture of the right femur. The care plan for R8 included the use of non-skid strips in front of the commode, but these were not in place at the time of observation. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the strips were on a maintenance list but had not been installed, demonstrating a lapse in executing necessary safety measures to prevent falls.
Staffing Shortages Lead to Delayed Care and Improper Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of its residents, affecting all 78 residents. One resident, with severe cognitive deficits and at risk for pressure ulcers, was observed sitting in a wheelchair for an extended period without being repositioned, leading to a non-blanching red area on the hip. The resident's care plan did not specify repositioning frequency, and staff were overwhelmed with duties, resulting in delayed care. Another resident, who is cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting, reported long wait times for call light responses, leading to incontinence episodes. The resident also experienced transfers with only one staff member using a mechanical lift, contrary to the care plan requiring two staff members. This was attributed to insufficient staffing levels. Additional residents reported similar issues, including delayed incontinence care and improper transfers due to staffing shortages. Staff interviews confirmed that having only one CNA per hall was insufficient to meet residents' needs timely, leading to unmet care requirements and increased wait times for assistance.
Inadequate Hot Water in Shower Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the shower rooms on the 200 and 500 halls had hot water, which has the potential to affect all residents residing on these halls. During the survey, the water temperatures in the shower rooms were found to be significantly below the required levels, with readings of 79.7 and 84.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The Maintenance Director acknowledged ongoing issues with maintaining adequate hot water temperatures, stating that the highest temperature achieved was 89 or 90 degrees Fahrenheit, and that the problem had persisted for about a month. Two residents, both cognitively intact and requiring assistance with showers, reported issues with the water temperature. One resident expressed that the water was sometimes warm enough but often reverted to being cold, necessitating showers on other halls, which was described as degrading. Staff members, including an LPN and a CNA, confirmed the inconsistency of hot water availability, particularly on the 500 hall. The facility's policy on water temperatures lacked specific temperature documentation, further complicating compliance with state regulations.
Misappropriation of Resident Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from the misappropriation of funds, affecting 25 out of 26 residents reviewed for this issue. The incident came to light when a surveyor reported a complaint about the administration stealing money. An investigation revealed discrepancies in the resident trust fund accounts, with a total of $5,124.97 unaccounted for by receipts. The former Administrator and Business Office Manager were implicated, with the Administrator manually adding time to the Business Office Manager's payroll for days not worked. The Administrator admitted to taking funds due to personal need, which escalated over time. The facility's audit of the resident trust fund showed several residents had purchases listed without proper receipts. Despite the discrepancies, some residents expressed no concerns about their funds being taken and replaced. The facility's Abuse Prevention Policy emphasizes the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of property, yet the incident indicates a breach of this policy. The facility has since replaced the missing funds and notified all relevant parties, including the Medical Director, Local Police, and Ombudsman.
Deficiency in Timely Incontinence Care and Hygiene Supplies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and ensure the availability of shampoo/body wash for residents, as evidenced by multiple resident and staff interviews. Residents reported significant delays in receiving assistance for toileting hygiene, leading to incontinence episodes. For instance, one resident stated it could take up to thirty minutes for staff to respond to call lights, resulting in incontinence. Another resident reported waiting for two hours without assistance, during which time they experienced incontinence. Staff interviews corroborated these accounts, with several CNAs acknowledging that staffing shortages led to delays in providing necessary care. The facility's care plans for residents with self-care performance deficits did not adequately address their bowel and bladder care needs. For example, one resident's care plan included interventions for mechanical lift transfers but did not address toileting care. Another resident's care plan mentioned checking for incontinence every two hours and answering call lights promptly, yet the resident reported frequent delays in receiving assistance. Staff members confirmed that when only one CNA was assigned per hall, it was challenging to meet residents' needs in a timely manner, particularly for incontinence care. Additionally, the facility was found to be lacking in essential hygiene supplies, such as shampoo and body wash. Observations revealed that several storage areas and resident rooms were devoid of these supplies, with only a few bottles available in certain areas. Staff and family members had resorted to purchasing these items themselves. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the insufficiency of supplies, noting that two bottles would not suffice for the number of residents in the facility.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving a resident and a staff member. The incident occurred when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reported witnessing an unwanted contact between a resident and the Activities Director. The resident, who has severe cognitive deficits and a history of playful slapping, reportedly slapped the Activities Director on the bottom. In response, the Activities Director tapped the resident on the shoulder. The facility's investigation revealed that the Activities Director did not intend to harm the resident, but the action was still considered inappropriate. The incident was reported to the Director of Nursing, who initiated an investigation and removed the Activities Director from contact with residents. The resident involved in the incident has a complex medical history, including severe intellectual disability, autism, and impulse disorder, and is non-verbal with the mentality of a three-year-old. The resident's care plan acknowledges his tendency to playfully slap staff members and includes interventions to manage this behavior. Despite the resident's lack of injury and the playful nature of his actions, the facility's policy on abuse prevention emphasizes the right of residents to be free from abuse, leading to the determination that the incident constituted a deficiency in protecting the resident from physical abuse.
Failure to Report Misappropriation of Resident Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident funds to the Administrator, as required by their Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedures. A resident, identified as R4, reported missing money from his wallet on two separate occasions. Despite R4's report to a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who claimed to have informed the Director of Nursing (DON), the Regional Director of Operations stated there were no investigations related to the missing money. The facility's policy mandates that employees report any suspicion of misappropriation to the administrator, which did not occur in this instance. R4, who is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, reported the missing money to two staff members but could not recall their names. The facility's initial report, prompted by a state surveyor's inquiry, documented the incident and subsequent investigation, which included notifying local authorities and reviewing facility video footage. However, the investigation did not determine the whereabouts of the missing funds. The facility replaced $100 of the reported missing amount, but the failure to report the incident to the Administrator as per policy constitutes a deficiency.
Failure to Prevent Pressure Ulcers and Maintain Hand Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement necessary interventions to prevent pressure ulcers and did not adhere to hand hygiene standards during treatment administration for three residents. One resident, with severe cognitive deficits and at risk for pressure ulcers, was observed with a non-blanching red area on the right hip after being left in a wheelchair for an extended period without repositioning. The care plan did not specify repositioning frequency, and staff were unclear about their responsibilities, leading to inadequate care. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and had an unstageable pressure ulcer, received treatment from an LPN who did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. The LPN admitted to skipping hand hygiene due to nervousness, which is against the facility's hand hygiene policy. This lapse in protocol could potentially contribute to infection risks. A third resident, with severe cognitive deficits and requiring substantial assistance, was reportedly left in a wheelchair for up to 12 hours, causing exhaustion. The care plan lacked specific interventions for repositioning, and there was a communication breakdown among staff regarding the resident's care needs. The facility's policies on pressure ulcer prevention and hand hygiene were not followed, contributing to these deficiencies.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 110 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mount Carmel
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcendent Healthcare Of Owensville | 10.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Riveroaks Health Campus | 10.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Waters Of Princeton, The | 11.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
| The Haven On The River | 16.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 1 |
| The Haven Of Bridgeport | 20.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Oakview Nursing & Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.