Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Continental Nursing & Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with impaired cognition and total dependence for mobility was found to have sustained fractures of unknown origin, which were only discovered after a hospital transfer. The facility did not report the injury within the required timeframe as outlined in its abuse prevention policy, submitting the report to authorities later than the 24-hour window allowed.
A resident with impaired cognition and multiple medical conditions was admitted with bilateral heel deep tissue injuries, but the facility failed to accurately assess and document these injuries or update the care plan to include necessary interventions such as heel protectors. Weekly skin assessments did not reflect the resident's true condition, and discrepancies existed between assessment tools and the care plan regarding the resident's mobility and needs.
A resident dependent on staff for transfers, with multiple medical conditions and moderate cognitive impairment, fell during a mechanical lift transfer when the lift tipped and caused the wheelchair to flip. Two staff members were present, but the lift's legs were not properly spread for stability, leading to the incident. The resident was evaluated and found to have no injuries.
A resident's personal refrigerator was not consistently monitored according to facility policy, as daily temperature checks were not documented on several dates. Although the refrigerator was observed to be clean and within the appropriate temperature range, staff interviews confirmed that required documentation was not completed each day, resulting in a failure to follow established food safety procedures.
Surveyors found that the facility did not enforce its no-smoking policy, as evidenced by the smell of cigarette smoke and cigarette butts found in a resident's room. Staff interviews confirmed that smoking is prohibited indoors, but a resident admitted to past non-compliance and was known to have violated the policy. The facility's failure to supervise and enforce smoking restrictions created an accident hazard for residents and staff.
Two residents with behavioral histories had escalating altercations, culminating in one spraying a substance in the other's face, causing a fall and head laceration requiring staples. Despite prior care planning and increased monitoring after an earlier argument, staff did not prevent the physical assault and resulting injury.
A resident admitted for IV antibiotic treatment for osteomyelitis and wound infection did not receive IV Vancomycin as ordered by the physician, missing four doses over the first two days after admission. The medication was available in the facility's automated system, but was not administered or obtained via STAT order, as confirmed by the DON and review of the MAR and care plan.
Smoking was observed in non-designated areas such as resident rooms and common restrooms, with cigarette odors and marks present. Staff, including a CNA and an LPN, confirmed the issue, and an oxygen tank was found near a restroom where smoking occurred. The facility's policy and state law prohibit indoor smoking, but these were not enforced, impacting the safety and comfort of all residents.
A resident with diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral infarct did not receive all prescribed medications, including diabetes and antidepressant drugs, due to the facility's failure to re-order them in accordance with policy. Nursing staff confirmed that medications were not re-ordered when the bingo card indicator signaled low supply, resulting in unavailable doses at the time of review.
The facility did not enforce its smoking safety policy, allowing a resident to smoke inside a shared room where another resident was on continuous oxygen therapy. Despite staff awareness and multiple reports from non-smoking residents about cigarette smoke in rooms and hallways, the issue persisted, with staff finding a lit cigarette in the room and residents admitting to indoor smoking. The resident on oxygen, with significant respiratory and cardiac conditions, was not immediately moved after reporting the incident, and staff did not consistently search for or confiscate smoking materials. Facility policy prohibiting indoor smoking and smoking near oxygen was not effectively implemented, resulting in exposure of vulnerable residents to cigarette smoke.
A resident with significant medical needs experienced ongoing dental pain for over a year due to the facility's failure to arrange timely dental extractions as recommended by the facility dentist. Despite repeated complaints and documentation of the need for extractions, staff did not schedule necessary appointments or secure transportation, and the resident continued to receive pain medication without resolution of the underlying dental issue.
Surveyors observed unsanitary kitchen conditions, including garbage and debris on the floor, overfilled trash containers attracting flies, and unclean equipment. The freezer was not functioning properly, with the door unable to close and food items found fully defrosted at unsafe temperatures. Multiple food items in the refrigerator were not labeled or dated, and some showed signs of spoilage. Staff confirmed lapses in cleaning routines and food safety practices, and facility policies regarding sanitation and food storage were not followed.
A resident with hypertension and heart disease did not consistently receive Amlodipine at the scheduled time, with multiple late administrations and one undocumented dose. Nursing staff interviews revealed lapses in documentation and failure to notify the physician when medications were late or refused, contrary to facility policy.
Surveyors found that a resident's opened insulin pen was not discarded after expiration, an unopened insulin pen was not refrigerated, and two residents' inhalers were missing required open dates. An expired house stock medication was also stored in a medication cart. LPNs and the DON confirmed that these actions did not follow facility policy for medication labeling, storage, and disposal.
Staff failed to follow standardized pureed diet recipes by not measuring liquid when preparing pureed beef lasagna, instead adding unmeasured amounts of water and then thickener to adjust consistency. This practice resulted in diluted nutritional content for several residents on pureed diets, contrary to facility policy and dietary orders.
Staff failed to follow standardized recipes when preparing pureed diets, resulting in diluted and improperly prepared pureed lasagna for several residents. The cook added unmeasured amounts of water, leading to a thin consistency that required additional thickener, contrary to facility policy and dietitian guidance. This practice risked residents not receiving the intended nutritional value from their prescribed pureed diets.
A resident was found to be self-administering multiple medications, including expired and over-the-counter products, without a physician order or a documented assessment to determine if self-administration was appropriate. The DON confirmed that facility policy requires both a safety assessment and a physician order for bedside medication storage and self-administration, but neither was present in the resident's records.
A resident who was cognitively intact did not have a documented advance directive or physician order for code status, and their care plan did not address these issues. Facility policy requires that advance directive preferences be obtained, documented in physician orders, reflected on the face sheet, and included in the care plan, but this process was not followed for the resident.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for three residents, resulting in incorrect documentation of oxygen therapy, tracheostomy care, ventilator use, trunk restraint use, and catheter use. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that these interventions were not provided or required, and the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the errors after review. The assessments were not properly verified against clinical documentation as required by facility policy.
A resident with an order for Gabapentin 300mg was found with thirty-four capsules at the bedside after nurses had documented administration. The resident stated he did not want the medication, and staff interviews confirmed that nurses are expected to remain with residents to ensure medications are swallowed, as per facility policy.
Two residents did not receive care according to physician orders and facility policy: one with chronic liver disease and Hepatitis C lacked specialist coordination and regular lab monitoring, and another with a PICC line did not have the dressing changed weekly as required, resulting in a dressing remaining in place for 13 days.
A resident who was cognitively intact was found to have two countertop microwaves at bedside, which were used to warm up food. This was observed by a surveyor, and the resident confirmed their use. Facility policy prohibits microwaves in resident rooms due to safety concerns and requires administrative approval for such items, but the microwaves were present without proper authorization.
Three cognitively intact residents did not receive their scheduled medications within the facility's required timeframe, with administration occurring up to two hours late and documentation not completed as required. Nursing staff confirmed the delay and lack of immediate documentation, citing workload issues, in violation of facility policy.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions received an antibiotic for a UTI, but the facility failed to accurately document the correct dosage in the medical record. An LPN transcribed the order as 1 mg instead of 1 g, and this error was reflected in the Medication Administration Record, although the correct dose was administered. Staff interviews and pharmacy records confirmed the documentation error.
The facility experienced significant delays in meal service due to insufficient dietary staff, affecting residents' dining experiences. Meals were served later than scheduled, with some residents receiving cold food on disposable plates. The dietary manager confirmed staffing shortages, leading to changes in menu items and delays in meal preparation and delivery. Residents and staff expressed frustration over the late service, highlighting the facility's failure to maintain adequate staffing levels.
The facility failed to serve adequate food portions as per the recipes and spreadsheets, affecting all 141 residents. Observations revealed incorrect serving utensils were used, leading to smaller portions of mashed potatoes, pureed and ground Country Fried Steak, and vanilla pudding. The dietary staff acknowledged the errors, and the registered dietitian highlighted the importance of following portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition.
The facility failed to provide meals according to the posted schedule, with dinner often served past 7 PM and breakfast as late as 10 AM, causing residents to experience hunger and frustration. Staffing shortages in the kitchen contributed to these delays, and residents with conditions like Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus expressed dissatisfaction with the erratic meal schedule. The facility's policy of no more than 14 hours between dinner and breakfast was not consistently followed, violating residents' rights to timely and nourishing meals.
The facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature, as reported by several residents and confirmed by a surveyor's test tray. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with cold meals served on disposable plates, and staff attributed the issue to staffing shortages and the discontinuation of a heated plate system. The Registered Dietitian confirmed that food temperatures were below required standards, impacting resident satisfaction and potentially their nutritional intake.
A resident reported missing personal items, including a transportation pass and clothing, which were not addressed according to the facility's grievance policy. The Social Service Director provided ill-fitting clothing from a free rack instead of replacing the lost items, and failed to complete a concern form, leaving the administrator unaware of the issue. This violated the resident's rights to keep personal belongings and have a safe place for valuables.
A resident in a LTC facility was found in a room with a leaking bathroom sink and a moldy mattress, which had not been addressed despite being reported. The resident, who has a history of allergies and a high fall risk, expressed concerns about slipping and allergy symptoms. The Maintenance Director and Housekeeping Director acknowledged the issues, and a Paint Contractor suggested the ceiling spots were likely mold. The facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment as required by residents' rights.
A resident with intact cognition reported missing clothes and was unable to go to a store to purchase new ones, despite being told she could. The resident had no designated closet space, and staff confirmed her clothing was lost. The facility's policy on accommodating resident needs was not upheld.
A resident with quadriplegia and respiratory failure developed a trachea infection due to inadequate care planning. The facility failed to include the resident's tracheal infection and behavior regarding suctioning in the care plan. Despite the resident's frequent requests for suctioning, which staff believed contributed to the infection, the care plan did not address these issues. The facility also did not document a care plan meeting with the resident or family, violating their policy for person-centered care.
A resident, who is cognitively intact, was found without individual closet space for clothing, leading to her wearing the same clothes from the previous day. The closet space in her room was occupied by her roommates, and the facility's administrator stated that providing a cabinet for clothing is not a requirement. The resident expressed frustration about not being able to go to the store to purchase clothes.
A resident with cognitive impairment in a LTC facility was injured in two separate incidents involving other residents. The first incident involved a resident with intact cognition who admitted to punching the impaired resident, resulting in scratches and abrasions. The second incident involved another cognitively impaired resident who tapped the impaired resident's face, causing swelling and redness. Both incidents were inadequately reported and documented, and the facility's response did not align with its abuse policy.
A resident with dementia was involved in two separate incidents of abuse by other residents, resulting in injuries. The facility failed to properly investigate and document these incidents, with inaccuracies in reports and missing witness signatures, contrary to its abuse policy.
A facility failed to properly label, date, and contain oxygen equipment for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including chronic respiratory failure. The resident's trach nebulizer mask and oxygen tubing were found undated and improperly stored, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the equipment should be dated, changed weekly, and stored in a bag to prevent contamination.
A resident in a LTC facility was physically abused by a roommate, resulting in a hip fracture. The altercation occurred over room temperature adjustments, with the aggressor using a cane to strike the victim. Despite the incident being reported, the facility's response was inadequate, as the investigation was incomplete and previous altercations had not been addressed. The facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy effectively.
The facility failed to supervise residents' smoking practices adequately, leading to unauthorized smoking inside the building and insufficient monitoring in designated smoking areas. A resident was found smoking in his room, and staff did not enforce the policy requiring supervision in smoking areas, allowing residents to light their own cigarettes. This poses a safety risk, especially to residents on oxygen.
A medication cart on the 3rd floor was found unlocked and unattended, contrary to the facility's policy requiring it to be locked or attended by authorized staff. A surveyor, with a housekeeping staff member, discovered the cart in this state, and the housekeeping staff was able to open the drawer. An LPN later arrived and locked the cart, acknowledging the oversight.
Two residents engaged in a verbal altercation that escalated to physical violence, with one resident hitting the other in the hallway. Staff intervened to separate them, and both were sent to the hospital. The facility's policy to prevent abuse was not effectively implemented, as the altercation involved physical contact, which is considered abuse.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was involuntarily confined in their room by a CNA using a garbage bag to block the door, constituting involuntary seclusion. The incident was reported by another resident and confirmed by facility staff, leading to the CNA's termination. The facility's policies prohibit such actions, emphasizing residents' rights to dignity and respect.
A resident with a history of falls and high fall risk was admitted to the facility without a baseline care plan being developed within the required timeframe. The resident experienced multiple falls without appropriate interventions, highlighting a failure to adhere to facility policies and federal regulations regarding care planning.
A resident experienced mental abuse when a psychiatric technician threatened to revoke her green pass privileges due to her family's complaints. The resident, who has a history of anxiety and PTSD, felt threatened and unsafe. The incident was witnessed by the resident's roommate, and the Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the threat as verbal abuse, although the facility's administrator was skeptical.
The facility failed to accommodate residents using bariatric wheelchairs, preventing them from accessing the bathroom in their rooms. Despite having intact cognition, a resident with multiple health conditions could not independently use the bathroom due to the wheelchair's size. Staff confirmed that the bathroom doors were too narrow for bariatric wheelchairs, violating the facility's policy to individualize the environment for residents' needs.
The facility's kitchen was found to be in unsanitary conditions, with unclear management and understaffing contributing to the issue. Personal items were improperly stored, and kitchen equipment was dirty, posing a risk of foodborne illness. Expired milk and undated raw pork chops were found in the cooler, and the cook reported being unable to clean due to lack of staff.
A resident with a history of cerebral infarction and dementia was unable to attend church services due to a change in their community pass status, requiring supervision. Despite the resident's cognitive intactness and willingness to pay for transportation, the facility failed to make arrangements for church attendance, violating the resident's rights. Attempts to contact the resident's church for assistance were unsuccessful, and the facility's van was deemed unreliable for weekend use.
A resident with a history of mental illness was hit on the back of the head by another resident with documented aggressive behavior. Despite staff presence, the altercation occurred in the dining room, and the aggressive resident continued to exhibit threatening behavior. The facility's policy requires immediate reporting and investigation of abuse, but the claim was not substantiated, highlighting a deficiency in resident safety and abuse prevention.
A resident reported being hit by another resident in the dining room, but the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation. Key witnesses were not interviewed, and the investigation concluded without substantiating the abuse claim, despite admissions of aggressive behavior. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the investigation's inadequacy, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's compliance with its abuse prevention policy.
A resident with multiple medical conditions did not receive the prescribed double portions of their meal, as indicated on their meal ticket. The dietary staff confirmed the oversight, citing a shortage of pork chops as the reason for not fulfilling the double portion requirement. The facility's policy on portion control was not adhered to, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including spinal stenosis and muscle wasting, did not receive prescribed physical therapy services due to the facility's failure to follow physician's orders. Despite an active order for therapy evaluation and treatment, the resident was not re-evaluated after discharge from therapy, and the therapy department was not informed of the need for further services. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the pain clinic's plan should have been treated as an order.
Failure to Timely Report Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its abuse prevention policy regarding the timely reporting of an injury of unknown origin for one resident. The resident, who had significant cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all mobility and transfers, was transferred to the hospital after being found weak, pale, and difficult to arouse. Hospital records revealed that the resident had sustained a fracture of the right acetabulum and a compression fracture of the first lumbar vertebra. There was no documentation or evidence of a fall or trauma at the time of the hospital transfer, and the facility only became aware of the fractures upon the resident's return from the hospital. According to the facility's abuse prevention policy, injuries of unknown origin must be reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made if abuse or serious injury is involved, or within 24 hours if not. The facility submitted the initial report to the State Agency one day after learning of the fractures, rather than within the required 24-hour timeframe. The final investigation report did not determine how the injuries occurred. This failure to report the injury of unknown origin in a timely manner was not in accordance with the facility's policy.
Failure to Timely Assess and Update Care Plan for Pressure Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely and accurately assess a resident for pressure injuries and did not update the care plan after the identification of bilateral heel deep tissue injuries. The resident, who had impaired cognition and was non-ambulatory, was admitted with significant medical diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and fractures. Upon admission from the hospital, the resident had right and left heel deep tissue injuries, which were treated with skin prep and foam dressing. However, the use of heel protectors was not included as a physician order or as an intervention in the care plan. The Braden assessment inaccurately documented the resident's mobility status, conflicting with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and care plan, which indicated the resident was dependent and non-ambulatory. Weekly skin assessments conducted by the facility repeatedly documented no loss of skin integrity, even after the hospital and facility records confirmed the presence of bilateral heel pressure injuries. One assessment was recorded while the resident was not present in the facility, and subsequent assessments failed to note the existing injuries. The facility's policy required that actual pressure injuries be addressed in the care plan and that assessments be timely and accurate, but these steps were not followed for this resident.
Failure to Ensure Safe Mechanical Lift Transfer
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for a dependent resident with multiple diagnoses, including cerebral palsy, COPD, obesity, muscle wasting, and hypertensive heart disease. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for transfers, experienced a fall during a transfer from wheelchair to bed using a mechanical lift. During the transfer, the mechanical lift tipped over and caused the resident's wheelchair to flip, resulting in the resident falling to the ground while still seated in the wheelchair. The incident was attributed to the staff not spreading the legs of the mechanical lift appropriately, which compromised the stability of the equipment during the transfer. Interviews and documentation confirmed that two staff members were present during the transfer, as required, but the mechanical lift was not used according to facility policy, which states that the base legs should be fully opened for stability. The resident did not sustain any injuries from the fall and was sent to the hospital for evaluation, where no injuries were found. The mechanical lift was inspected after the incident and found to be functioning properly, indicating that improper use by staff was the cause of the accident.
Failure to Document Daily Temperature Checks for Resident Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently document daily temperature checks for a resident's personal refrigerator, as required by facility policy. During observations, the refrigerator was found to be clean, organized, and set to an appropriate temperature; however, the daily temperature log was missing entries for several dates in December. Interviews with the resident and staff confirmed that while the temperature was verbally checked and maintained within the expected range, documentation was not consistently completed. The resident reported a previous incident where the refrigerator was not plugged in, resulting in spoiled food, and expressed concern that staff do not always record the temperature as required. Staff interviews revealed that housekeeping is responsible for monitoring, cleaning, and documenting the temperature of personal refrigerators daily, with an expected range of 35-40 degrees Fahrenheit. Both nursing and housekeeping staff acknowledged the importance of daily documentation to ensure food safety, as outlined in facility policies. Despite these expectations, the lack of consistent documentation on the temperature log constituted a failure to follow established procedures for monitoring food safety in resident refrigerators.
Failure to Enforce No-Smoking Policy Creates Accident Hazard
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain a safe and healthy living environment by not enforcing its no-smoking policy on the third floor, where 59 residents reside. On multiple occasions, surveyors detected the smell of cigarette smoke inside a resident's room shortly after leaving, and cigarette butts were found on the floor next to a resident's bed. Interviews with staff, including the Assistant DON and Social Service Director, confirmed that smoking is prohibited inside the building due to safety concerns and state law, especially given the presence of oxygen in the facility. Despite these policies, a resident admitted to having smoked inside the facility in the past and was known to be non-compliant with the smoking policy, as documented in their care plan. Staff reported that they had not witnessed residents smoking in the facility and had not been notified of such incidents, although procedures were in place for searching residents and their rooms if smoking was suspected. The facility's smoking safety policy clearly states that smoking is only allowed in designated outdoor areas and that the interior of the facility must remain smoke-free at all times. The presence of cigarette smoke and cigarette butts in a resident's room, along with the resident's history of non-compliance, demonstrates a failure to adequately supervise and enforce the facility's smoking policy, resulting in an accident hazard for residents and staff.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse Resulting in Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by another resident, resulting in a significant injury. On one occasion, two male residents with BIMS scores of 15/15 and histories of behavioral issues had an argument in the dining room, which was stopped by a nurse before it became physical. The following day, while on the smoking patio with approximately 15 people present, one resident sprayed a substance into the other's face, causing the second resident to fall and hit his head on a metal bench. This resulted in a 3.2 cm laceration to the top of the head, requiring 8 staples at the hospital. The incident was witnessed by staff and other residents, and the injured resident reported being unable to see after being sprayed, leading to the fall and injury. Both residents had prior incidents and were care planned for abuse potential following the initial altercation. After the first argument, the facility moved one resident to another room and increased monitoring of both individuals. Despite these measures, the second altercation occurred, resulting in physical harm. Staff responded to the code gray, provided first aid, and called 911. The injured resident was treated at the hospital and later readmitted, while the aggressor was discharged from the facility. The facility's policy prohibits abuse, neglect, and mistreatment, but the measures in place did not prevent the incident.
Failure to Administer IV Antibiotic as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer intravenous (IV) Vancomycin as ordered by the physician for a resident admitted with multiple diagnoses, including osteomyelitis and wound infection. Upon admission, the resident was supposed to receive IV Vancomycin every eight hours for seven days, as per hospital discharge instructions and physician orders. However, the medication was not administered on the first two days after admission, resulting in four missed doses. The resident reported not receiving the medication as scheduled, and this was confirmed by review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and nursing progress notes, which showed that IV Vancomycin was not started until the third day after admission. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication was available in the facility's automated medication and supply management system and should have been administered as ordered or obtained via a STAT order from the pharmacy if needed. Facility policies require medications to be administered as prescribed and in accordance with physician orders. Despite these policies and the availability of the medication, the resident's care plan and MAR indicated that the IV antibiotic was not given as ordered, resulting in a failure to meet the pharmaceutical needs of the resident.
Failure to Restrict Smoking to Designated Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that smoking was restricted to designated areas, as required by both facility policy and state law. Multiple residents reported that smoking was occurring inside resident rooms, common restrooms, shower rooms, and other non-designated areas. One resident specifically stated that this has been a continuing problem, and another resident reported smelling strong cigarette odors upon entering a common restroom. A third resident confirmed the ongoing issue and expressed concern about the impact on residents who are exposed to cigarette smoke. During an inspection of the common restroom, cigarette marks were observed on the wall, and a strong odor of cigarettes was present. Additionally, a crash cart with an oxygen tank was found just outside the restroom, raising further safety concerns. Staff members, including a CNA and an LPN, confirmed the presence of cigarette odors in the restroom and acknowledged that residents are not permitted to smoke in these areas. The Assistant Director of Nursing also observed the cigarette marks and the proximity of the oxygen tank to the restroom, reiterating that smoking should not occur near oxygen tanks or in restrooms. The facility's Smoking Safety Policy states that smoking is only allowed in designated areas and that the interior of the facility must remain smoke-free in accordance with state and local laws. The Smoke Free Illinois Act prohibits indoor smoking in healthcare facilities, including all rooms and hallways, and requires a minimum distance from entrances and ventilation intakes. Despite these policies and regulations, the facility did not prevent residents from smoking in prohibited areas, affecting the safety and comfort of all residents.
Failure to Timely Re-Order and Provide Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to re-order medications in a timely manner for one resident, resulting in the unavailability of three prescribed medications: Glipizide and Metformin (both for diabetes) and Trazodone (an antidepressant). The resident, who has a medical history of diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral infarct, reported not receiving all her medications, including eye drops and diabetes medication. Upon review of the medication cart with a registered nurse, it was confirmed that these medications were not available at the time of observation. Facility staff, including the Assistant Director of Nursing and the registered nurse, acknowledged that medications should be re-ordered when the bingo card indicator reaches the dark blue area, which corresponds to eight doses remaining. The facility's policy requires staff to request refills from the pharmacy 72 hours before the last dose. However, the nurse stated that the re-order for Glipizide and Metformin was only placed on the day of the observation, indicating a failure to follow the established policy and ensure timely medication availability for the resident.
Failure to Enforce Smoking Safety Policy and Prevent Indoor Smoking Near Oxygen Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its smoking safety policy and did not ensure that residents refrained from smoking inside shared rooms, including areas where oxygen equipment was in use. Multiple residents, including one who was on continuous oxygen therapy due to respiratory failure, were exposed to cigarette smoke in their shared room. Despite clear facility policies prohibiting smoking inside and near oxygen, staff found a resident with a lit cigarette in a shared room, and cigarette smoke was observed in the air. Other residents in adjacent rooms also reported smelling smoke coming from the hallway and from open windows, indicating that the issue was ongoing and affected several individuals. The resident on oxygen, who had significant medical conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and a history of cerebral infarction, reported feeling unsafe and distressed due to being housed with smokers. This resident was not immediately moved after reporting the incident to staff, and only after a subsequent event was the resident relocated to another room. Staff interviews and documentation revealed that the resident who was smoking inside the room admitted to doing so, kept smoking materials in their possession, and had previously been found non-compliant with safe smoking regulations. Staff also observed this resident lighting cigarettes using another resident's lit cigarette during supervised outdoor smoking breaks, in violation of facility policy. Several staff members, including LPNs, CNAs, and social services staff, were aware of the ongoing issue of residents smoking inside the facility but did not consistently follow up or conduct thorough searches for contraband smoking materials. Documentation in the electronic health record was sometimes incomplete or stricken out, and there was a lack of immediate investigation or intervention when allegations of indoor smoking were reported. The facility's own policy clearly prohibits smoking in non-designated areas and near oxygen, but these rules were not effectively enforced, resulting in exposure of non-smoking residents, including those with respiratory conditions, to cigarette smoke.
Failure to Provide Timely Dental Care Resulting in Prolonged Pain
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its dental policy and address negative dental findings immediately for one resident, resulting in a delay of recommended dental procedures and ongoing dental pain. The resident, who has multiple medical diagnoses including paraplegia, diabetes, and an open foot wound, was identified by the facility dentist as needing multiple tooth extractions. Despite repeated dental consults and recommendations for extractions, the necessary procedures were not arranged in a timely manner. Documentation shows that the resident missed appointments due to issues with discontinuing blood thinners, and transportation arrangements were not made as required. The resident continued to experience dental pain for over a year, as confirmed by interviews with the resident, staff, and the ombudsman. Staff interviews revealed a lack of follow-through in scheduling dental appointments, with the appointment scheduler only becoming aware of the need for a dental visit after being notified by the ombudsman. The scheduler also encountered difficulties finding a dental provider who accepted the resident's insurance and had not yet resolved the issue. The DON and administrator could not recall being made aware of the resident's ongoing dental pain prior to the most recent notification. The facility's policy requires immediate action on negative dental findings, but this was not followed, resulting in prolonged discomfort for the resident.
Sanitation and Food Storage Deficiencies in Kitchen Operations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary kitchen conditions, ensure proper functioning of the freezer, properly label and date food items, and maintain cleanliness of kitchen equipment. During an initial kitchen tour, surveyors observed significant garbage and debris on the floor in the tray line and food preparation areas, including used hairnets, empty cups, food particles, and greasy residue on the floor tiles. The wall behind the oven was splattered with yellow/brown stains, and the oven itself had dried food residue. Trash containers were overfilled, with lids unable to close, attracting black flies. Additional uncovered boxes of garbage were found near the hand sink and walk-in refrigerator, and a pile of cooked eggs was observed falling from an egg carton toward the floor. A mop bucket filled with dirty water and an unclean mop was also present, and staff confirmed that the floor had not been cleaned that day. The freezer was found with its door partially open and unable to close properly due to a faulty locking mechanism. Inside, there was standing water and ice accumulation on food boxes, and the temperature was recorded at 25°F, above the required 0°F or less. Several food items inside the freezer, including vegetables, pork loin, supplement treats, and oral supplement shakes, were fully defrosted. Staff acknowledged that all products in the freezer should be frozen solid and that the current state compromised food safety. The maintenance director was unaware of the freezer issue, and the dietary manager confirmed that the freezer had been functioning the previous day, with staff responsible for documenting temperatures twice daily. In the refrigerator, multiple food items were found without proper labeling or dating, including hotdogs, hamburger patties, and cheese, while some items were past their use-by dates and showed signs of spoilage. The can opener on the prep table was dirty with thick residue, and staff admitted it had not been cleaned as required. Facility policies provided by the administration outlined expectations for sanitation, garbage disposal, equipment cleaning, and food labeling, all of which were not followed as observed during the survey. The facility's diet order list indicated that two residents were receiving nothing by mouth (NPO) at the time of the survey.
Failure to Administer Medication as Scheduled and Inadequate Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as scheduled per physician orders for one resident. Specifically, the resident reported not receiving his prescribed Amlodipine at the scheduled morning time on multiple occasions within a twenty-day period, sometimes receiving it as late as the evening. Review of the Medication Administration Audit Report confirmed several instances where the medication was administered late, including times in the afternoon and evening, and one instance where there was no documentation of administration at all. Progress notes did not provide explanations for the late administration or indicate that the physician was notified, as required by facility policy. Interviews with nursing staff revealed inconsistent practices regarding documentation and notification when medications were not administered as ordered or were refused by the resident. One LPN could not recall if the medication was given or refused and admitted to not documenting the event. The Director of Nursing stated that medications should be administered within a specific time window and that late administration or refusals should be communicated to the physician and documented. The resident in question had diagnoses of essential hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease and was cognitively intact at the time of the deficiency.
Medication Storage, Labeling, and Disposal Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies related to the storage, labeling, and disposal of medications and biologicals. During inspection of medication carts, an opened multi-dose insulin pen was found that had not been discarded after its expiration date, and an unopened insulin pen was not stored in the refrigerator as required. Additionally, two opened multi-dose inhalers were found without the date opened written on their labels, despite manufacturer instructions to discard them after a specific period. An expired bottle of house stock medication was also found stored in the medication cart. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that facility policy requires medications and biologicals to be labeled and stored according to manufacturer recommendations, with opened insulins and inhalers dated and discarded after their respective expiration periods. Expired medications are to be immediately removed from stock and disposed of. The observed failures to date, store, and discard medications as required were not in accordance with facility policy or professional standards.
Failure to Follow Standardized Pureed Diet Recipe
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow standardized pureed recipes during food preparation, specifically when preparing pureed beef lasagna for residents on pureed diets. During observation, the cook did not measure the amount of water added to the lasagna, instead filling the blender container halfway or until the food was covered, resulting in a watery and thin consistency. The cook then added food thickener to adjust the texture, rather than following the recipe instructions to add the smallest amount of liquid gradually and only as needed. This process was repeated for multiple batches, and the cook confirmed that he does not measure the water, which deviates from the standardized recipe requirements. The facility's Regional Director of Kitchen Operations and Registered Dietitian both stated that following the standardized recipes is essential to ensure residents receive the correct nutritional content, as adding too much liquid can dilute calories and protein. Facility documentation, including job descriptions, menu extensions, recipes, and policies, all require adherence to standardized recipes and proper procedures for consistency-modified foods. The deficiency was identified as having the potential to affect eight residents who were prescribed pureed diets as part of their physician-ordered dietary needs.
Failure to Follow Standardized Pureed Diet Recipe
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow standardized recipes during the preparation of pureed diets for eight residents who required this diet texture. During observation, the cook prepared pureed beef lasagna by adding unmeasured amounts of water to the blender, resulting in a watery and thin consistency. The cook admitted to not measuring the water and instead filled the blender container halfway or until the food was covered, then added food thickener to adjust the consistency. This process was repeated for two batches, both resulting in diluted pureed lasagna. The standardized recipe required that liquid be added gradually, starting with the smallest amount, and only adding more if needed, with a specific total amount for ten portions. The facility's policies also required the use of standardized recipes and careful addition of liquids and thickeners to maintain nutrient density. Interviews with the Regional Director of Kitchen Operations and the Registered Dietitian confirmed that recipes should be followed to ensure residents receive the correct nutrition, and that adding excessive liquid can dilute the nutritional value of the food. The job description for the cook position also required preparation of food according to standardized recipes and special diet orders. Physician orders and menu extensions confirmed that the affected residents were prescribed pureed diets and were to receive pureed skillet lasagna. The failure to follow the standardized recipe and preparation procedures had the potential to affect the nutritional intake of the residents receiving pureed diets.
Failure to Assess and Authorize Resident Self-Administration of Medication
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome, autonomic nervous system disorder, sixth nerve palsy, and chronic knee pain was observed in bed with several medications at the bedside, including Opcon-A eye drops, an expired tube of Pevisone topical cream, and a bottle of vitamin B-12 lozenges. The resident reported ordering these medications online and self-administering them as needed for eye and skin allergies, as well as taking vitamin B-12 daily. The registered nurse present confirmed there was no physician order for the resident to keep medications at the bedside or to self-administer them, and no assessment had been completed to determine if self-administration was clinically appropriate. Review of the resident's clinical records revealed no documentation of a physician order permitting bedside storage or self-administration of medication, nor evidence of a completed self-administration safety assessment. Additionally, laboratory results showed the resident's vitamin B-12 level was above the normal reference range. Facility policy requires a written physician order and assessment for residents to self-administer medications or store them at the bedside, but these steps were not followed in this case.
Failure to Document and Care Plan Advance Directive and Code Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure regarding advance directives for one resident. Specifically, the resident's face sheet had a blank section for advance directives, and the order summary report showed no physician order for the resident's code status. Additionally, the resident's comprehensive care plan did not address advance directives or code status. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 14. According to the Social Service Director, code status preferences are to be obtained upon admission, reviewed quarterly, and documented in the physician orders, face sheet, and care plan, with the POLST form uploaded to the electronic medical record. The facility's guidelines require that the resident's wishes, physician orders, and care plan all match regarding advance directives, but this was not done for the resident in question.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents, resulting in incorrect documentation of their clinical status and care needs. For one resident, the MDS assessment inaccurately recorded the use of oxygen therapy, suctioning, tracheostomy care, and invasive mechanical ventilation, despite the absence of any supporting diagnoses, physician orders, or progress notes. Interviews with nursing staff and the resident confirmed that these interventions were never provided or required. Another resident's MDS assessment incorrectly indicated the use of a trunk restraint, although there were no orders, documentation, or staff recollection of restraint use, and the resident did not recall ever being restrained. A third resident's MDS assessment documented the use of external and indwelling catheters, even though the indwelling catheter had been discontinued following a surgical procedure, with no evidence of reinsertion during the assessment period. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged errors in the assessments after reviewing the cases during the survey, confirming that the information entered did not reflect the residents' actual conditions. The facility's policy requires that MDS assessments be accurate, complete, and supported by clinical documentation, in accordance with the RAI manual. However, the assessments in question were not verified against the residents' diagnoses, physician orders, medication and treatment records, or progress notes, leading to inaccurate reporting of the residents' care and treatment during the designated observation periods.
Failure to Ensure Proper Medication Administration and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow professional standards of care in medication administration for one resident. The resident had an active physician order for Gabapentin 300mg to be given orally three times a day for nerve pain. During an observation, a bottle containing thirty-four Gabapentin capsules was found on the resident's bedside table, and the resident stated he had informed the nurses that he did not want the medication. The registered nurse present acknowledged that the capsules were Gabapentin and that nurses should have monitored the resident to ensure the medication was swallowed. Interviews with nursing staff, including the Director of Nursing and a registered nurse who had administered the medication, confirmed that it was their expectation and facility policy for nurses to remain with residents to ensure medications are swallowed. However, the Medication Administration Record indicated that nurses had been signing off that the Gabapentin was given, despite the accumulation of capsules at the bedside. The facility's policy specifically requires staff to remain with residents during medication administration to ensure compliance.
Failure to Coordinate Specialist Care and Adhere to PICC Line Dressing Protocols
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate appropriate care and follow physician orders for two residents with significant medical needs. One resident with chronic liver disease and Hepatitis C did not have services coordinated for specialist care or regular monitoring as ordered by the physician. Despite multiple progress notes indicating the need for hepatology consults and regular monitoring of liver enzymes and viral load, there was no evidence that the resident had seen a hepatologist or had relevant labs drawn since 2021. Facility staff, including the nurse and Director of Nursing, were unable to provide documentation of recent specialist visits or lab results, and only initiated new orders for labs and consults after the survey began. Another resident with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line did not have the dressing changed according to physician orders and facility policy. The resident was observed with a PICC line dressing that had not been changed for 13 days, despite an order for weekly changes and a policy requiring transparent dressings to be changed every 5-7 days. The resident could not recall the last dressing change, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the required frequency for dressing changes to prevent infection, but the order and policy were not followed.
Fire Hazard: Unauthorized Microwave Use in Resident Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a fire hazard by allowing a resident to keep two countertop microwaves at their bedside. During an observation, a surveyor found the microwaves in the resident's room, and the resident confirmed using them to warm up food. The resident was noted to be cognitively intact according to their clinical records. The facility's Admission Agreement specifically prohibits items such as microwaves in resident rooms due to safety regulations, and requires approval from the DON or Administrator before bringing such items into the facility. Despite these policies, the microwaves were present in the resident's room at the time of the survey.
Failure to Administer and Document Medications per Physician Orders and Facility Policy
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to administer medications according to physician orders and facility policy for three residents. On the day of the survey, two residents reported not receiving their scheduled morning medications by the expected time, and one resident was unsure when medications were administered. Observations confirmed that scheduled 9:00 AM medications were given to these residents between 11:43 AM and 11:56 AM, well outside the facility's guideline of administering medications within 120 minutes of the scheduled time. The Medication Administration Reports (MARs) for these residents were marked 'red,' indicating that documentation of medication administration was not completed at the time of the survey. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that medications are expected to be administered within one hour before or after the scheduled time and that documentation should occur immediately after administration. The nurse responsible acknowledged administering some medications two hours late due to being delayed while escorting a resident. All three residents involved were cognitively intact, as indicated by their Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) scores. The facility's own Drug Administration Guidelines require timely administration and documentation, which was not followed in these instances.
Failure to Accurately Document Antibiotic Dosage
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to accurately document the dosage of an antibiotic order for a resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including cerebral palsy, hydrocephalus, epilepsy, drug-induced systemic lupus, urinary tract infection, anxiety, and psychosis. The resident's Minimum Data Set indicated moderately impaired cognition. The order summary and progress notes showed conflicting documentation regarding the dosage of Meropenem prescribed for a urinary tract infection. Specifically, the order was documented as 1 mg intravenously three times a day, when it should have been 1 gram. The Medication Administration Record reflected the incorrect 1 mg dosage, although the correct 1 gram dose was actually administered. Interviews with facility staff confirmed the documentation error. The LPN responsible for transcribing the order admitted to writing the wrong dosage, and the DON acknowledged the mistake, stating that the antibiotic does not come in the documented amount. The pharmacist also verified that only 1 gram bags of Meropenem were dispensed and administered. Facility policies require accurate transcription and implementation of physician orders, as well as comprehensive assessments to inform individualized care plans, but these were not followed in this instance.
Staffing Shortages Lead to Delayed Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, resulting in residents receiving their meals late. Observations and interviews revealed that meals were consistently served later than the posted schedule, with dinner trays arriving as late as 7 PM instead of the usual 5 PM. This delay affected multiple residents, including those with significant medical conditions such as quadriplegia, epilepsy, and chronic respiratory failure. Residents expressed frustration and hunger due to the late meal service, and some reported receiving cold food on disposable plates. The dietary manager confirmed that the kitchen was short-staffed, with only one cook and two dietary aides working per shift instead of the required three aides. This staffing shortage led to delays in meal preparation and delivery, as well as changes in menu items due to the inability to prepare food from scratch. The use of disposable plates was also attributed to the lack of staff to wash regular dishes, further impacting the residents' dining experience. Staff interviews corroborated the residents' complaints, with several staff members acknowledging the late meal service and the use of disposable plates. The facility's meal frequency policy and residents' rights documentation emphasize the importance of timely and respectful meal service, which was not upheld due to the staffing issues. The report highlights the facility's failure to maintain adequate staffing levels in the dietary department, leading to significant disruptions in meal service and resident dissatisfaction.
Inadequate Food Portions Served to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve adequate food portions as documented on the recipes and spreadsheets, potentially affecting all 141 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. During a survey, it was observed that the serving utensils used for various food items were not in accordance with the portion sizes specified in the recipes. Specifically, a #10 scoop was used for mashed potatoes instead of the #8 scoop, a #16 scoop was used for pureed Country Fried Steak instead of the #8 scoop, and a #20 scoop was used for ground Country Fried Steak instead of the #8 scoop. Additionally, the vanilla pudding was portioned with a #12 scoop instead of the required #8 scoop. The dietary staff, including the cook and dietary aide, acknowledged the discrepancies in portion sizes. The cook stated that the recipes were not available to him on the day of the survey, and the dietary aide admitted to using the wrong scoop for the vanilla pudding. The dietary manager confirmed that the incorrect portion sizes were served and acknowledged the potential nutritional impact on the residents, including insufficient protein and calorie intake. The registered dietitian emphasized the importance of following the portion sizes listed on the menus and recipes to ensure residents receive adequate nutrition. The facility's policies and job descriptions require adherence to planned menus and standardized recipes, with proper serving utensils to ensure accurate portions. However, the failure to follow these guidelines resulted in residents receiving less food than required, which could lead to nutritional deficiencies.
Inconsistent Meal Delivery Times in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide meals according to the posted mealtime schedule, resulting in residents receiving their meals late. Observations and interviews revealed that dinner trays were often served past 7 PM, breakfast trays were delivered as late as 10 AM, and lunch trays arrived around 2 PM or later. This inconsistency in meal delivery times led to residents experiencing hunger and frustration, as they were not receiving meals at expected times. The facility's dietary manager confirmed that staffing shortages in the kitchen contributed to these delays, with fewer dietary aides available than required. Several residents, including those with conditions such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Heart Failure, and Asthma, expressed dissatisfaction with the erratic meal schedule. They reported feeling hungry due to the long intervals between meals, particularly when dinner was served late and no substantial bedtime snack was offered. The facility's policy requires that no more than 14 hours should elapse between the evening meal and breakfast unless a nourishing snack is provided, which was not consistently happening. Staff members, including CNAs and nurses, corroborated the residents' complaints, noting that meal trays were often delivered late, causing frustration among residents. The dietary manager acknowledged the issue, stating that the kitchen was short-staffed, leading to delays in meal preparation and delivery. The facility's failure to adhere to the posted meal schedule and provide adequate snacks between meals violated residents' rights to timely and nourishing meals, as outlined in the facility's policies and residents' rights documentation.
Facility Fails to Serve Food at Proper Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature for several residents, as observed and reported by both residents and staff. Residents R4, R7, R12, and R13 all expressed dissatisfaction with the food being served cold, which made it unappealing and inedible. R4 mentioned the lack of access to a microwave to reheat food, while R12 and R13 noted the use of disposable plates and the cold temperature of their meals. The surveyor's test tray confirmed that the food temperatures were below the required standards, with hot food items like Country Fried Steak and Mashed Potatoes measuring significantly below the recommended 140 degrees Fahrenheit. The dietary staff, including the Dietary Manager and Dietary Aide, acknowledged the issues with food temperature and attributed them to staffing shortages. The facility had stopped using a heated plate system, which previously helped maintain food temperatures during delivery, due to the increased labor required for cleaning the equipment. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the use of disposable plates was a result of insufficient staff to wash regular plates, particularly affecting the 2nd floor, which was the last unit served. The Registered Dietitian highlighted that the food temperatures were not meeting the required standards and emphasized the importance of serving hot food hot and cold food cold to ensure resident satisfaction and prevent potential negative impacts on residents' nutritional intake. The facility's policy on Resident Satisfaction mandates that food should be palatable, attractive, and served at the proper temperature, which was not being adhered to, as evidenced by the residents' complaints and the surveyor's observations.
Failure to Address Resident Grievances and Missing Property
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its grievance policy and resident rights, specifically in handling a resident's missing personal items. A resident, who is cognitively intact, reported that her Free Ride transportation pass and six dollars were missing from her belongings. Despite informing the social worker, no immediate action was taken to address the missing items. Additionally, the resident's clothing sent to the laundry was not returned, and the facility did not replace the items to her satisfaction. The Social Service Director provided the resident with clothing from the free clothes rack, which were not new and did not fit properly. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the replacement clothing and was not offered reimbursement or replacement of her original items. The Social Service Director admitted to not completing a concern form regarding the missing items, which is a requirement under the facility's grievance policy. The facility's administrator was unaware of the missing items due to the lack of a completed concern form. The facility's policy requires immediate reporting of any alleged violations involving misappropriation of resident property to the administrator. The failure to follow this protocol resulted in the resident's grievances not being addressed promptly, violating her rights to keep and wear her own clothing and to have a safe place for her valuables.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Sanitary Environment for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for a resident, identified as R12, who was observed with a leaking bathroom sink. The sink had a garbage can placed underneath to catch the water, which was filled approximately 25% with water. R12 reported that the sink had been leaking since her admission to the facility, and she had to be cautious not to knock the garbage can out of place to prevent water from spilling onto the floor. R12 expressed concern about the potential for slipping, as she had previously broken her wrist from a fall at home due to slipping on water. Despite the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reporting the issue to the Maintenance Director a month prior, the leak had not been addressed. Additionally, the room contained an empty bed with a mattress that appeared to have black mold-like spots and multiple rips and holes in the plastic covering. R12, who has a history of allergies, reported symptoms such as watery eyes, a stuffed nose, and headaches, which she attributed to the moldy mattress and ceiling spots. The Maintenance Director and Housekeeping Director acknowledged the condition of the mattress and the ceiling, with the Maintenance Director noting that the ceiling spots were from a previous flood. The Paint Contractor suggested that the spots were likely mold and recommended using special paint to treat the area. R12, who has a diagnosis of seizures, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, anemia, hypertension, difficulty walking, weakness, and allergic rhinitis, was assessed as having intact cognition and a high fall risk. The facility's job description for the Maintenance Director includes ensuring that residents' rooms are safe and free from hazards. The Illinois Long-Term Care Residents' Rights document also mandates that the facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike, which was not upheld in this case.
Failure to Accommodate Resident's Clothing Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate the basic needs and preferences of a resident, identified as R12, regarding clothing and personal storage space. R12, who has intact cognition and a BIMS score of 13, reported that her clothes were lost within the facility and expressed a desire to go to a store to purchase new clothing. Despite being told by the Activity Director that she could go, R12 was not taken to the store. During an observation, it was noted that R12 was wearing the same clothes from the previous night and had no additional clothing in her room. The Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed that R12's closet space was occupied by her roommates, leaving R12 without a designated area for her belongings. The Director of Social Service acknowledged R12's lack of clothing and the absence of a personal storage area, stating that R12 was under a specific program that required accompaniment when leaving the facility. Despite efforts to locate R12's clothing, including a search by housekeeping staff, no additional clothes were found. The facility's policy states that residents have the right to retain personal possessions and appropriate clothing, yet R12's needs were not met, as she was left without adequate clothing or storage space, contrary to the facility's stated policies on resident rights and accommodation of needs.
Failure to Provide Person-Centered Care Plan for Resident with Tracheostomy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a person-centered care plan for a resident with a tracheostomy, leading to a deficiency in care. The resident, who has quadriplegia, seizure disorder, and respiratory failure with hypoxia, was admitted to the facility and later developed a trachea infection with MRSA. Despite the resident's intact cognition, the care plan did not address the tracheal infection or the resident's behavior concerning suctioning requests. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these issues were not included in the care plan, and there was no documentation of a care plan meeting involving the resident or their family to address these concerns. The resident frequently requested suctioning, even when not clinically indicated, which staff believed contributed to the infection. The Respiratory Therapist noted that excessive suctioning could lead to infection, trauma, or bleeding, and emphasized the importance of clinical judgment in assessing the need for suctioning. Despite these observations, the facility's care plan did not reflect these issues, and there was no evidence of the resident's participation in care planning, as required by the facility's policy. This lack of a comprehensive, individualized care plan that addresses the resident's specific needs and behaviors constitutes a deficiency in care.
Resident Lacks Individual Closet Space for Clothing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide individual closet space for a resident, identified as R12, which is a requirement for addressing residents' needs for functional furniture. R12, who is cognitively intact and alert, reported not having any clothes in her room and expressed frustration about not being able to go to the store to purchase clothes. During an observation, it was noted that R12 was wearing the same clothes from the previous day, and there were no clothes delivered for her. The closet space in the room was occupied by R12's roommates, R15 and R16, leaving R12 without a designated area for her clothing. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the absence of clothing for R12 and acknowledged that the closet space was allocated to the other residents in the room. The Director of Social Service was informed of the situation, and it was confirmed that R12 did not have a place to store her clothes. The facility administrator stated that providing a cabinet for clothing is not a requirement but something the facility offers. The admission packet indicates that residents have the right to retain personal possessions and appropriate clothing, as space permits, unless it infringes on the rights or safety of others.
Failure to Protect Resident from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident with cognitive impairment from abuse by other residents, resulting in injuries on two separate occasions. The first incident involved a resident with dementia, who sustained scratches and abrasions on the neck and face after an altercation with another resident. The resident with intact cognition admitted to punching the cognitively impaired resident because he was blocking the way. Despite the altercation being witnessed by a Certified Nursing Assistant, there was a delay in reporting the incident to the Registered Nurse, who was on break at the time. The incident was not immediately documented, and the facility's response was inadequate, as the administrator later suggested that the injuries might have been self-inflicted. In a second incident, the same cognitively impaired resident was injured when another resident, who also had cognitive impairments, tapped the resident's face, resulting in swelling and redness around the eye. This incident occurred in the hallway when the resident with dementia accidentally bumped into the other resident. The staff was busy at the time, and the incident was observed from the nurse station. The injured resident was subsequently sent to the hospital for further evaluation, where the incident was classified as an assault. The facility's abuse policy prohibits resident abuse and requires staff to report and document any incidents of abuse or injury. However, in both incidents, there were delays in reporting and inadequate documentation. The facility's administrator downplayed the severity of the incidents, attributing them to the residents' cognitive impairments and suggesting that the injuries were not intentional. This response was not in accordance with the facility's abuse policy, which mandates the prevention and prohibition of resident abuse.
Failure to Investigate Resident Abuse Incidents Properly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its policy on investigating incidents of abuse for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident, who has a medical history of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, was involved in an incident where another resident admitted to punching him in the face. Despite the admission, the facility's investigation did not conclude that the injury was caused by the other resident, and the final report submitted to the state agency inaccurately documented that there were no injuries. In another incident, the same resident was hit in the face by a different resident, resulting in swelling and redness around the eye. The facility's report to the state agency again inaccurately stated that there were no injuries, despite medical records and witness statements indicating otherwise. The facility's investigation process was flawed, with missing witness signatures and discrepancies in the documentation of the incidents. The facility's abuse policy requires immediate reporting and thorough investigation of any alleged abuse, including documentation of injuries and witness statements. However, the facility's handling of these incidents did not comply with its policy, as evidenced by incomplete and inaccurate reports, lack of proper documentation, and failure to conclude investigations based on known facts.
Failure to Properly Label and Contain Oxygen Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy regarding the labeling, dating, and proper containment of oxygen equipment for a resident requiring respiratory care. The resident, who is cognitively intact and has multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia, asthma, and chronic respiratory failure, was observed with a trach nebulizer mask and oxygen tubing that were not dated or properly contained. The equipment was found lying in a grey basin with wound care cleaner and antifungal powder, which were also uncontained and undated. Interviews with facility staff, including a Registered Nurse, the Director of Nursing, and the Infection Prevention Nurse, confirmed that the oxygen equipment should be dated, changed weekly, and stored in a zip lock bag when not in use to prevent contamination and infection. The facility's policy on oxygen administration requires that tubing, humidifier bottles, and filters be changed, cleaned, and maintained at least weekly, with each item labeled with the date, time, and initials of the staff member completing the service. Despite these requirements, the facility failed to ensure compliance, leading to a deficiency in the provision of safe and appropriate respiratory care for the resident.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent and protect a resident, identified as R8, from physical abuse by another resident, R9. The incident occurred when R8 and R9, who were roommates, got into a verbal and physical altercation over room temperature adjustments. R9 used his walking cane to strike R8, resulting in R8 being sent to the hospital with a left hip fracture. The altercation was reported by another roommate, R3, who witnessed the incident and informed the nurse on duty, V12. Despite the severity of the incident, the facility's response was inadequate as the administrator, V1, had not yet completed the investigation or spoken to other residents involved. R8, who uses a wheelchair and has a history of osteoarthritis of the hip, epilepsy, and other mobility issues, was left vulnerable to the attack. The nursing progress notes indicate that R8 complained of pain in the left hip and was administered pain medication while awaiting an ambulance. R8's medical records confirmed a femoral fracture upon hospital admission. R9, who has diagnoses including major depressive disorder and insomnia, was also sent to the hospital following the altercation. The facility's initial report to the state agency was submitted, but the investigation was still ongoing at the time of the survey. The administrator had not yet received confirmation of R8's hip fracture and had not contacted the hospital for further information. Additionally, R3 reported that this was not the first altercation between R8 and R9, indicating a pattern of unresolved conflict that the facility failed to address adequately. The facility's policy on abuse prevention was not effectively implemented, leading to this deficiency.
Inadequate Supervision of Smoking Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent residents from smoking inside the facility, which is against the established policy. On multiple occasions, a resident was reported to be smoking in his room and bathroom, which was confirmed by the smell of cigarette smoke detected by staff and a surveyor. Despite being informed of the situation, the social worker delayed addressing the issue due to other responsibilities, and the resident was found with cigarette ashes in his nightstand. The facility's policy prohibits smoking inside and requires supervision in designated smoking areas, but this was not enforced effectively. Additionally, the facility did not ensure proper supervision in the designated smoking area. Two activity aides were observed monitoring residents from inside the building rather than being present outside with the residents. This lack of direct supervision allowed a resident to light his own cigarette, which is against the facility's policy. The aides admitted that residents sometimes hide lighters, and cigarette butts were improperly discarded on the ground, increasing the risk of fire hazards. The facility's failure to enforce its smoking policy and provide adequate supervision poses a significant safety risk, especially to residents who are prescribed oxygen. The facility document lists 22 residents on oxygen, with several residing on the same floor as the resident who was smoking inside. The facility's policy clearly outlines the need for staff to control smoking materials and supervise residents while smoking, but these measures were not adequately implemented, compromising resident safety.
Medication Cart Left Unlocked and Unattended
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the medication cart on the 3rd floor was locked or attended by authorized staff, as required by their policy. During a surveyor's visit, it was observed that the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended in the hallway and nursing station area. The surveyor, accompanied by a housekeeping staff member, found no staff present in the vicinity, and the housekeeping staff was able to open the drawer of the medication cart, confirming it was not locked. When a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) arrived shortly after, they immediately locked the cart. Upon inquiry, the LPN initially claimed the cart was locked but acknowledged the oversight when informed that the drawer had been opened. The facility's medication storage policy mandates that medication carts be locked or attended by authorized personnel, such as licensed nurses or pharmacy staff, to ensure the safety and security of medications and biologicals.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse, resulting in a physical altercation between two residents, R3 and R4. The incident occurred in the hallway when R3 and R4 engaged in a verbal argument that escalated to physical violence, with R3 hitting R4. Interviews with staff members, including a CNA and the Director of Social Services, confirmed that the altercation involved physical contact, which is considered a form of physical abuse. The facility's abuse policy, which prohibits and prevents resident abuse, was not effectively implemented in this situation. The altercation was witnessed by staff members who intervened to separate the residents. R3 was noted to have a history of being verbally aggressive and combative when redirected, as documented in a care plan revision. The incident was reported to the Assistant Director of Nursing, who confirmed that both residents were sent to the hospital following the altercation. The facility's policy on resident rights and protection emphasizes the right to be free from abuse and neglect, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's ability to uphold this standard during the incident.
Involuntary Seclusion of a Resident Using a Garbage Bag
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its abuse policy by involuntarily confining a resident, identified as R2, in their room using a garbage bag to block the door. This incident involved a severely cognitively impaired male resident with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and other conditions requiring assistance with personal care. On the night of the incident, a CNA, identified as V11, placed a bag around R2's door to prevent him from pacing in the hallway, which was later identified as involuntary seclusion. The resident was observed pacing in his room and appeared confused, unable to recall the incident due to his cognitive impairment. The incident was reported by another resident, R7, who witnessed the door being tied with a plastic garbage bag, preventing R2 from leaving his room. The Director of Social Services and the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the action constituted involuntary seclusion, which is not tolerated by the facility. The facility's abuse policy and resident rights documentation emphasize the prohibition of abuse and the right to dignity and respect. The investigation led to the termination of V11 for blocking R2's door, as there was no documentation or order justifying the need to confine R2 as a protective measure.
Failure to Implement Baseline Care Plan for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for a resident with a high risk of falls upon admission, as required by regulations. The resident, who was admitted with a history of multiple falls and diagnoses including vascular dementia and hemiplegia, experienced several falls within the facility without appropriate interventions or preventive measures in place. Despite being consistently assessed as high risk for falls, the resident's fall concerns were not addressed in a care plan until after multiple incidents had occurred. The facility's policy requires a baseline care plan to be developed within 48 hours of admission, but this was not done for the resident in question. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of clarity regarding the timing and responsibility for creating baseline care plans. The facility's failure to adhere to its own policies and federal regulations resulted in the resident experiencing multiple falls without adequate preventive measures being implemented.
Resident Threatened with Privilege Removal by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident, identified as R2, from mental abuse by a staff member, V12, a psychiatric technician. On October 11, 2024, V12 allegedly threatened R2 with the removal of her green pass privileges if her family continued to call the facility with complaints. This incident was corroborated by R2's roommate, R1, who heard V12 say that R2's green pass was in jeopardy. R2 reported feeling threatened and abused by this interaction, which caused her mental anguish. V12 claimed that he only relayed a message from V13, the social service coordinator, but V13 denied requesting R2 to speak with her about pass privileges. R2's medical history includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, with a BIMS score indicating intact cognition. The facility's policies emphasize the prohibition of resident abuse and the right of residents to be free from mental abuse. Despite these policies, the incident involving V12's threat to R2's privileges was perceived as verbal abuse by the Assistant Director of Nursing, V2, who acknowledged that such a threat constitutes verbal abuse. The facility's administrator, V1, however, expressed skepticism about the situation being abusive, noting a history of abuse allegations involving R2.
Inadequate Bathroom Access for Bariatric Wheelchair Users
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate accommodations for residents requiring bariatric wheelchairs to access the bathroom in their rooms. This deficiency affected two residents, one of whom was diagnosed with multiple health conditions including type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity, and chronic respiratory failure. Despite having an intact cognitive status, the resident was unable to independently access the bathroom due to the size of their bariatric wheelchair, which was too wide to fit through the bathroom door. Observations and interviews with staff confirmed that the wheelchair's width exceeded the bathroom door's width, preventing the resident from using the bathroom independently. The facility's policy on ensuring reasonable accommodation of needs was not adhered to, as the physical environment was not individualized to support the independence of residents with bariatric needs. Staff, including the Maintenance Director and Assistant Director of Nursing, acknowledged the issue, noting that the bathroom doors in all resident rooms were of the same size and did not accommodate bariatric wheelchairs. The Maintenance Director also highlighted that this situation did not provide a homelike environment and posed a safety risk for residents attempting to use the bathroom independently.
Deficiencies in Kitchen Cleanliness and Food Safety
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness and proper food safety standards in the kitchen, which has the potential to affect all 139 residents receiving food prepared there. The kitchen lacked a dietary manager, and the staff were unclear about who was in charge. Observations revealed that personal items were improperly stored on clean dish racks, leading to potential cross-contamination. The kitchen equipment, including the steam table pans and meat slicer, was found to be dirty with food residues and substances that could cause foodborne illnesses. The kitchen counters and stove were covered with various colored crumbs and sticky substances, indicating a lack of regular cleaning. The oven was also found to be in a similar state, with thick black substances inside and on the door handles. Garbage cans were uncovered, and food crumbs were found on the floor, further contributing to unsanitary conditions. The facility's policy documents outlined specific cleaning procedures that were not being followed, such as covering and dating foods in the refrigerator and maintaining sanitation buckets to prevent cross-contamination. Additionally, the walk-in cooler contained expired milk and uncovered, undated raw pork chops, posing a risk of foodborne illness. The cook reported being unable to clean the kitchen due to understaffing, as there was no pan washer available. This situation led to the cook having to choose between cleaning and preparing meals, resulting in unclean conditions. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the staffing issue and mentioned that a new cook was expected to start soon.
Failure to Facilitate Resident's Attendance at Religious Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to make arrangements for a resident, identified as R7, to attend religious services of their choice, which is a violation of the resident's rights. R7, who has a medical history including cerebral infarction, type II diabetes, and dementia, among other conditions, was previously able to attend church services independently using a transportation service. However, after an incident where R7 was seen crossing the street in a wheelchair against traffic, the facility changed R7's community pass from green (independent) to yellow (requiring supervision), restricting R7's ability to attend church independently. Despite R7's cognitive intactness and expressed desire to continue attending church services, the facility did not make alternative arrangements to accommodate this change. The Social Service Director and Assistant attempted to contact R7's church to arrange for transportation assistance, but no arrangements were made, and R7 missed several church services. The facility's van, which was used for other appointments, was not considered a viable option for church transportation due to its unreliability and lack of staff availability on weekends. The facility's policy states that residents have the right to attend religious services of their choice, and the facility must make arrangements for this if the resident agrees to pay any associated costs. However, the facility did not fulfill this obligation, as no plan or agreement was made to ensure R7 could attend church services, despite R7's willingness to pay for transportation. This inaction led to a deficiency in honoring the resident's rights to a dignified existence and self-determination.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse by Another Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident, identified as R2, from physical abuse by another resident, R4, who has documented aggressive behavior. R2, who has a history of mental illness and other medical conditions, reported being hit on the back of the head by R4 in the dining room. Despite the presence of staff, the altercation occurred, and R2 was offered but declined pain medication. Neuro checks were initiated for R2 following the incident. R4, who also has a history of mental illness and aggressive behavior, was involved in the altercation with R2. R4 claimed that R2 provoked him, leading to the physical aggression. R4's care plan noted ongoing aggressive behavior, and staff were instructed to intervene when inappropriate behavior was observed. Despite these measures, R4's aggression towards R2 and staff continued, resulting in a recommendation for psychiatric evaluation. The facility's policy on abuse prevention requires immediate reporting and investigation of any incidents of abuse. However, the report indicates that the facility did not substantiate the abuse claim, despite multiple staff members witnessing the altercation and R4's known aggressive behavior. The facility's failure to effectively manage R4's aggression and protect R2 from harm constitutes a deficiency in ensuring resident safety and preventing abuse.
Inadequate Investigation of Alleged Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse involving two residents, R2 and R4. R2, who has a history of mental illness and cognitive communication deficits, reported being hit on the back of the head by R4 in the dining room. Despite the incident being witnessed by staff, including a certified nurse assistant, the investigation was not comprehensive. Key staff members, such as the activity aide who witnessed the event, were not interviewed, and there was a lack of documentation and signed statements from those involved. R4, who also has cognitive communication deficits and a history of aggressive behavior, admitted to hitting R2, claiming provocation due to racial slurs. Despite this admission and the ongoing aggressive behavior exhibited by R4, the facility's investigation concluded without substantiating the abuse claim. The facility's policy requires a thorough investigation, including interviews with all witnesses and involved parties, which was not adhered to in this case. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the inadequacy of the investigation, noting that not all staff were interviewed and that the necessary documentation was incomplete. The facility's failure to follow its abuse prevention policy and conduct a thorough investigation into the alleged abuse incident represents a significant deficiency in ensuring resident safety and compliance with regulatory standards.
Failure to Provide Double Portions as Prescribed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide double portions as listed on a resident's meal ticket, which was observed during a survey. The resident, who has a range of medical conditions including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Schizoaffective Disorder, was supposed to receive double portions of their meal as per their dietary requirements. However, during a lunch service, the resident received only a single portion of pork chop, corn, and sweet potatoes, despite the meal ticket indicating a double portion. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the meal, stating it was not enough food. The dietary staff, including a cook and a registered dietitian, confirmed that the resident should have received double portions, which would include two servings of each item on the menu. The cook mentioned that the failure to provide double portions was due to running out of pork chops. The interim dietary manager acknowledged the oversight and explained the process for ensuring dietary orders are followed, which involves communication between dietary staff, nurses, and physicians. The facility's policy on portion control emphasizes adherence to planned menus and proper communication of dietary requests, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Therapy Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician's orders for therapy evaluation and treatment for a resident diagnosed with spinal stenosis, radiculopathy, morbid obesity, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The resident's care plan included a focus on spinal stenosis with interventions for physical and occupational therapy evaluation and treatment as indicated. Despite an active order for therapy screening and potential treatment, the resident reported not receiving physical therapy services, with the facility citing insurance issues as the reason for not providing additional sessions. The Therapy Manager was unaware of the resident's desire for more therapy, and the Physical Therapist confirmed that the resident was discharged from therapy and not re-evaluated despite a physician's note recommending therapy twice a week. The nurse who attended to the resident after a pain clinic appointment did not report any new orders, including the therapy order. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the pain clinic's plan constituted orders that should have been followed. The facility's policies require following physician orders and completing evaluations upon receipt of such orders, which were not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,554 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 28 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Chicago
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balmoral Home | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Foster Health & Rehab Center | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Aperion Care Wesley | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Park View Rehab Center | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Astoria Place Living & Rehab | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Continental Nursing & Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.