Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Cascadia Of Nampa during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident admitted after joint replacement surgery developed a worsening rash, confusion, nausea, fever, shivering, hypotension, and tachycardia, but staff did not promptly notify the provider of the resident’s declining condition or document appropriate monitoring and interventions. The resident was later sent to the ED and diagnosed with sepsis and SJS/TEN, requiring transfer to a burn unit.
Food handling, storage, and sanitation practices were observed to be out of compliance. A food employee was seen preparing food and handling an unwrapped bun without observed hand hygiene before glove use or a glove change between tasks. Multiple opened food items were left undated in refrigerators, freezers, and kitchen bins, ice equipment had residue and a pink film, and staff food was stored with resident nourishments in a resident refrigerator and freezer.
A facility's undated Voluntary Agreement for Arbitration stated that hearings would be held in the county where the facility is located before a board of three arbitrators, but it did not include a venue convenient to both parties. After review of the agreement and the federal requirement, the Administrator acknowledged the missing regulatory requirement. This issue applied to all residents in the facility.
Infection control measures were not consistently followed during med prep, med administration, and laundry handling. An RN touched split pills with bare hands after dropping them on a cart, another RN failed to perform hand hygiene between resident care tasks and before giving meds, and a resident’s CPAP mask was left uncovered on the nightstand. Laundry staff also left wet clothing in washers overnight and took clean laundry back to the dirty side of the laundry room for labeling before delivery to resident rooms.
Food and coffee were served with poor palatability and improper temperatures. Residents reported cold meals, small portions, salty or overcooked food, and burnt-tasting coffee, while surveyors observed hot food placed on cold plates, trays without condiments, and multiple items on test trays outside acceptable temperature ranges. The Kitchen Mgr confirmed the coffee tasted burnt because staff were unfamiliar with the new coffee machines and brewed it too strong.
Failure to assess residents for safe self-administration of meds. Surveyors found meds left at the bedside for 3 residents without the required assessment to determine whether self-administration was safe and appropriate. One resident with stroke and DM had oral meds left on an overbed table while an RN left the room to get the correct eye drops; another resident with severe vision impairment had a cup with white powder at the bedside; and a third resident with OA and DM had ketoconazole cream on the overbed table and said he applied it himself as prescribed.
Call Lights Left Out of Reach for Two Residents: Two residents with significant ADL assistance needs were left alone in their rooms without their call lights within reach. One resident was cognitively intact and unable to move her wheelchair independently, while the other had moderate cognitive impairment, a right arm sling, and could not propel her wheelchair. CNA confirmed both call lights were out of reach, and the DON stated staff were expected to leave residents with call lights within reach.
A resident with hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia had a Quarterly MDS that stated oxygen therapy was not being received, even though the care plan indicated oxygen was ordered and the resident was observed receiving O2 via nasal cannula. The MDS Coordinator later stated the assessment should have been coded Yes for oxygen.
A resident with schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and developmental delay had a PASARR Level II indicating the admitting facility must complete the PASARR when the stay appears likely to exceed 30 days. The LSW stated the PASARR should have been submitted by the required deadline, but record review showed it was submitted 26 days late.
A resident with PTSD had an inaccurate PASARR Level I screening because PTSD was not checked as a major mental illness on the evaluation. During staff interview, the LSW stated the PASARR was not accurately completed and that a PASARR Level II assessment should have been completed.
Inaccurate smoking evaluations and an inaccurate care plan were identified for a resident who was an independent smoker with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, depression, and muscle weakness. Staff observed the resident leaving to smoke without stopping at the nursing station, an LPN said the resident kept smoking paraphernalia with him, and the DON confirmed the resident kept smoking items locked in his room even though the smoking evaluation and care plan stated the items should be stored at the nursing station. The resident’s care plan also required quarterly smoking evaluations, but only two assessments were documented, and the DON and CRN stated the resident did not receive the required quarterly reviews.
Failure to provide ordered oxygen. A resident with heart failure and acute/chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia had an order for O2 at 1 L/min via NC to keep sats above 90% every shift, and the care plan directed oxygen use as ordered. The resident was observed without NC oxygen in the dining room and again in her room, and a CNA stated the resident was supposed to have oxygen all day and night while the RCM stated she should have used oxygen continuously.
A resident with a urinary catheter had leakage, cloudy or strong-smelling urine, weakness, and increased drowsiness, but remained afebrile and denied flank pain, suprapubic pain, dysuria, or burning. Urine specimens were repeatedly collected or delayed, and the lab did not complete the C&S on one sample. Despite no documented McGeer criteria for CAUTI, the NP ordered Augmentin for a suspected UTI based on the urinary concerns and weakness.
The facility failed to properly contain waste, as a dumpster was observed open with trash exposed, contrary to the Pest Control policy. This was noted during a survey with the Dietary Manager, who confirmed the dumpster should have been closed, creating a potential risk for pest infestation affecting all 90 residents.
The facility failed to honor residents' rights for self-determination by not consistently allowing them to watch TV during meals, despite their expressed preferences. Some staff turned off the TV, while others did not, leading to resident dissatisfaction. The administration acknowledged that the TV could remain on if requested, as it is the residents' home and their choice.
A resident identified as a fall risk did not have a fall prevention intervention implemented as recommended by the interdisciplinary team. Despite being moderately cognitively impaired and requiring extensive assistance for mobility, the resident experienced a fall resulting in a bruise. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the absence of a fall mat, which was part of the resident's care plan to enhance safety.
The facility failed to offer the PCV20 vaccine to two residents eligible for it, as their records lacked documentation of shared decision-making with their physicians. One resident had a history of stroke and muscle weakness, while the other had end-stage renal disease. The Infection Preventionist confirmed the absence of a process for shared decision-making on the PCV20 vaccination.
Failure to Respond to Acute Change in Condition and Rash
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards when it did not identify and respond to Resident #60’s physical and cognitive deterioration. Resident #60 was admitted after joint replacement surgery and was documented as cognitively intact on admission, alert and oriented, and complaining of an itchy back. A physician ordered hydrocortisone for a rash on the back, but the skin inspection on admission did not document the rash. Later notes documented worsening rash symptoms, including a significant rash on the back with no improvement from hydrocortisone, moisture, rawness, soreness, and increased itching. The resident’s condition continued to change over the following days. Therapy notes documented disorientation, difficulty following simple directions, increased confusion, nausea, feeling hot then cold, and trouble with simple directions, but the record did not include documentation that the provider was notified of these changes. On 11/21/25, the resident was observed shivering with a fever of 101.9 F and was given Tylenol. Later that day, the resident had low blood pressure and tachycardia, and the record documented increased confusion/poor concentration and a mental status change. Orders were then received for IV fluids, labs, vital signs every 4 hours, holding certain medications, ceftriaxone for empiric sepsis-like symptoms, monitoring of the hip incision, and prednisone for the rash. The investigation found that the resident’s representative became upset after being notified of the change in condition and believed the facility was not equipped to manage the resident’s medical condition. The DON agreed and the resident was sent to the ED after the representative insisted, due to cognitive deterioration and irregular vital signs. At the hospital, the resident was diagnosed with sepsis and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and was airlifted to a burn unit for treatment after burns on 18% of her body. Interviews with the CRN, DON, and Medical Director confirmed the resident did not have appropriate monitoring, the care plan did not include monitoring or interventions for the rash, and the physician was not informed of the change in cognition.
Food Handling, Date Marking, Ice Machine, and Freezer Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Food handling practices were observed that did not follow the FDA Food Code. On 12/3/25, a food employee was seen preparing food while wearing gloves, taking food temperatures, and cleaning the thermometer with a sani-wipe without being observed performing hand hygiene before putting on gloves. The same employee was later observed using the same gloves to grab an unwrapped hotdog bun after having already prepared food and taken temperatures. The Kitchen Manager stated that proper glove use includes hand hygiene before and after glove use and when changing tasks, and acknowledged the employee should have changed gloves with hand hygiene before starting tray line and should have used tongs or clean gloves when handling the buns. Additional food storage and sanitation issues were observed in the kitchen and resident areas. On 12/1/25, multiple food items in the tray line refrigerator and freezer, the walk-in freezer, and large plastic bins in the kitchen were found opened and undated, including cheese, salsa, French fries, breaded chicken pieces, breaded steak fries, hoagie bread rolls, dried mashed potatoes, flour, oatmeal, and sugar. On 12/3/25, the Hall A ice room had a blue plastic scooper bucket with black residue on the bottom where the ice scooper was stored, and both Hall A and Hall B ice machines had a thin shiny pink layer on the interior plastic separator plate. On 12/5/25, the Hall A resident freezer contained multiple open and undated items with visible layers of ice indicating the food had been defrosted and refrozen, and the Hall B nourishment refrigerator contained staff food items, including an open drink, iced coffee, and whipped cream, stored alongside resident nourishments.
Arbitration Agreement Lacked Convenient Venue Provision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its arbitration agreement provided for the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. The facility's undated Voluntary Agreement for Arbitration stated that any arbitration hearing arising under the agreement would be held in the county where the facility is located before a board of three arbitrators. During interview on 12/3/25 at 10:55 AM, after review of the arbitration agreement and the federal regulation requirement, the Administrator stated the arbitration agreement was missing the regulatory requirement of a convenient location of arbitration for both parties. This issue applied to all residents who reside in the facility.
Infection Control Lapses During Medication Prep and Laundry Handling
Penalty
Summary
Infection prevention and control measures were not consistently implemented during medication preparation and administration for multiple residents. During medication preparation for one resident, an RN used hand sanitizer, split a pill, dropped the halves on the tabletop, then picked up one half with her fingers and placed it in the medication cup before returning the other half to the pill container. The IP stated this was inappropriate because medications should not be touched with an ungloved hand and contaminated medication should have been discarded. In other observations, an RN entered a resident’s room to administer insulin, removed gloves, donned new gloves without performing hand hygiene, and then administered eye drops; on another occasion, the same RN left a resident’s room to retrieve eye drops and returned without performing hand hygiene. Another RN administered medications to a resident while dentures were left uncovered on the overbed table, and the RN stated she could have educated the resident better regarding infection prevention. Additional observations showed improper handling and storage of resident equipment and medications. A resident who used CPAP had the CPAP mask observed uncovered and laying on the machine hose on the nightstand on two separate observations, and the resident confirmed the mask was often left out with no cover. An RN also administered nasal spray to a resident without performing hand hygiene and without gloves, and stated she did not feel infection control had been breached and was not worried about infection control or cross contamination. The resident receiving the nasal spray had diagnoses including a respiratory disorder, cough, and need for assistance with personal care, and another resident had diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and malnutrition. Laundry practices also did not follow the facility’s policy for handling, storing, processing, and transporting linens to prevent contamination. Wet clothing was found left in washers overnight, and laundry staff stated clothing was often left in the washer and rew washed if it became stinky. Staff also stated that after drying resident clothing, items needing labels were taken back to the dirty side of the laundry room to be labeled before being delivered to resident rooms. The Administrator confirmed the label machine was on the dirty side of the laundry room and stated laundry was washed, labeled, and then sent to resident rooms.
Food and coffee served at improper temperature and poor quality
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve palatable food and coffee at a safe and appetizing temperature. The Meal Service policy stated that each resident should receive three nourishing, palatable, and well-balanced meals daily consistent with clinical needs, dietary orders, and care plan directives. During interviews, residents reported that meals were not consistently served at the right temperature, the food was not consistently palatable, and the coffee tasted burnt. One resident stated the food was awful, another said the food was okay but portions were small and the temperature was not always right, and multiple residents in a Resident Council meeting reported that the food was always cold, butter would not melt, coffee creamer would not mix because the food and coffee were too cold, and the coffee tasted burnt. Surveyors observed tray line meal service and test trays on the lunch meal cart. Hot food was placed on cold plates, some trays were covered with insulated tops and heated bottoms while others used adaptable plates with a metal lid and no heated bottom, and condiments were not added to flavor the food. When the test trays were evaluated after delivery, several food temperatures were out of range and the meals were described as bland without seasoning or flavor. Surveyors were also provided the same coffee served throughout the facility and found it was not palatable and had a burnt taste. The Kitchen Manager confirmed the coffee had tasted burnt because staff were not familiar with the new coffee machines and made it too strong by not adjusting the brew boldness, and confirmed the facility had not provided food and coffee that were palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Failure to Assess Residents for Safe Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safety to self-administer medications, despite a policy stating residents may self-administer medications when it is determined to be safe and appropriate and that each request will be assessed using a team-based approach. Surveyors found this issue for 3 of 19 residents whose medications were observed at bedside: Resident #49, Resident #52, and Resident #87. The report states that the facility did not ensure these residents had assessments to determine whether bedside medication storage and self-administration were clinically appropriate. Resident #49, who had diagnoses including stroke and diabetes, was observed on 12/3/25 when an RN entered the room with oral medication mixed with pudding and left the medication cup on the resident’s overbed table while leaving to retrieve the correct eye drops. Resident #49 asked for Dorzolamide eye drops before the oral medications, and the RN returned with the eye drops and administered them before giving the oral medications. Resident #52, who had diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness and heart failure, had a medication cup containing white powder observed on the bedside table; the MDS documented severely impaired vision, and the RCM stated the resident did not have an assessment to self-administer medications. Resident #87, who had diagnoses including osteoarthritis and diabetes, had ketoconazole cream observed on the overbed table, and the resident stated he applied it once or twice a day as prescribed by his dermatologist; the RCM stated the cream should not have been left in the room and that the resident did not have an assessment to self-administer medications.
Call Lights Left Out of Reach for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received reasonable accommodation of their needs and preferences when two residents were left alone in their rooms without their call lights within reach. Resident #28, who was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living due to muscle spasms, age-related physical debility, and a history of falling, had a care plan directing staff to encourage use of a standard call light and to validate its placement when leaving her alone. On 12/1/25, she was sitting in her wheelchair in her room and asked for her call light, which was observed on the bedside table on the opposite side of the bed from her wheelchair. She stated staff had left it out of reach about 20 minutes earlier, and she could not move her wheelchair by herself. CNA #1 later confirmed the call light was out of reach and should have been given to her before staff left the room. Resident #89, who had muscle weakness, surgical aftercare following right artificial shoulder joint replacement, moderate cognitive impairment, extensive ADL assistance needs, impaired mobility, and a non-weight-bearing right upper extremity, also had a care plan directing staff to encourage use of a standard call light and validate placement when leaving her alone. On 12/1/25, her call light was observed lying across the bed on her right side while she sat in a wheelchair positioned with the bed on her right and the wall on her left. She stated she could not reach the call light and could not propel her wheelchair because of her arm sling. CNA #1 confirmed the resident could not reach the call light and stated PT must have left it on the bed when returning her to the room. The DON stated her expectation was that all staff ensure residents are left with their call light within reach before leaving them alone in their room.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident #1. Resident #1 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #1 was not receiving oxygen therapy, even though a care plan initiated 5/27/25 stated the resident was to receive oxygen as ordered by the physician. On 12/1/25 at 12:03 PM, Resident #1 was observed in the dining room receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. On 12/2/25 at 3:44 PM, the MDS Coordinator reviewed the assessment and stated that Resident #1's MDS should have been coded Yes for oxygen.
Delayed PASARR Submission for a Resident With Mental Health and Developmental Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASARR program for Resident #9, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and lack of expected physiological development. The resident’s record contained an abbreviated PASARR Level II dated 10/1/25 stating that the admitting facility must complete a PASARR when it appears the stay will exceed 30 days, and no later than the 40th calendar day after admission. During interview on 12/5/25, the LSW stated the resident’s PASARR should have been submitted by 11/9/25, but review of the record showed it was not submitted until 12/4/25, 26 days late.
Inaccurate PASARR Screening for Resident With PTSD
Penalty
Summary
PASARR screening for mental disorders or intellectual disabilities was not accurately completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. Resident #44 was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including post-traumatic stress disorder, but the PASARR evaluation dated 10/2/23 did not have PTSD checked in the section asking whether the individual had any major mental illnesses. During a 12/3/22 interview, the LSW reviewed Resident #44's PASARR and stated the resident had a PTSD diagnosis and that the PASARR Level I was not accurately completed; the LSW also stated Resident #44 should have had a PASARR Level II assessment completed.
Inaccurate smoking evaluations and care plan not followed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide accurate and quarterly smoking evaluations and did not follow the resident’s care plan for one resident reviewed for smoking safety. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, schizoid personality disorder, dementia, depression, and muscle weakness, and a comprehensive MDS assessment documented the resident as cognitively intact. The facility’s Resident Assessment policy stated assessments are completed to evaluate the resident’s physical and mental condition or abilities, including smoking habits, and that assessment accuracy is necessary to document medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and to help identify resident strengths. A smoking evaluation report documented the resident as an independent smoker who was required to store smoking paraphernalia at the nursing station, but staff observations and interviews showed otherwise. The resident was observed leaving the facility to smoke without stopping at the nursing station, an LPN stated the resident kept smoking paraphernalia with him and not in the nursing cart, and the DON confirmed the resident kept smoking items locked in his room. The resident’s care plan also stated smoking paraphernalia should be stored at the nursing station, and the DON confirmed this care plan was not accurate because it did not identify that the resident could keep smoking paraphernalia locked in his room. In addition, the care plan required quarterly smoking evaluations and evaluations with any change of condition, but only two smoking assessments were documented over the period reviewed, and the DON and CRN stated the resident did not have quarterly smoking assessments and should have had at least two additional assessments in 2025.
Failure to Provide Ordered Oxygen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident received respiratory services consistent with the physician’s order and care plan. Resident #1, who was admitted with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, had a physician’s order dated 11/30/25 for oxygen at 1 liter per minute via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 90% every shift, and a care plan directing oxygen use as ordered by the physician. Despite this, Resident #1 was observed without oxygen via nasal cannula in the dining room at 9:11 AM and again in her room at 9:20 AM on 12/2/25. CNA #2 stated at 9:46 AM that the resident was supposed to have oxygen all day and night and said she did not notice the resident was not using it when she wheeled her to her room. Later that day, the RCM stated the resident should have used oxygen continuously.
Antibiotic Stewardship Failure for Suspected Catheter-Associated UTI
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship was implemented and that a resident had appropriate clinical indications for antibiotic use. The resident had multiple diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and was being monitored for urinary catheter leakage, urine odor, cloudy urine, weakness, and increased drowsiness. The record showed repeated assessments and urine specimen collection attempts, but the resident was afebrile and repeatedly denied flank pain, suprapubic pain, dysuria, or burning sensation. The resident’s urinary catheter was noted to be leaking significantly, and urinalysis with culture and sensitivity was ordered. A later note stated the specimen suggested improper collection or delay in delivery, and a repeat specimen was requested. The catheter was changed and another urine specimen was collected, but the laboratory did not complete the culture and sensitivity because the sample was reportedly thrown out. Despite the absence of documented fever, suprapubic pain, flank pain, dysuria, or altered mental status, the NP was informed of the resident’s weakness, increased sleeping, catheter leakage, and strong urine odor. Based on the concern for UTI, the NP ordered Augmentin 875/125 mg twice daily for 14 days after the urine was collected. The record also documented that the resident had no urinary complaints and that the antibiotic and urinalysis were later discontinued because the issue was considered resolved. Staff interviews confirmed the facility used McGeer’s criteria for UTI, and the IP stated that foul-smelling urine is not a criterion for infection and that catheter-associated UTI criteria include fever, hypotension, mental status change, or functional decline.
Improper Waste Containment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that waste was properly contained, as observed during a survey. The facility's Pest Control policy, dated 10/18/23, required routine inspections for evidence of pests and mandated that staff keep the facility grounds free of trash and brush, and ensure the dumpster area was clean with the lid closed. However, during an observation on 6/18/24 at 10:20 AM, it was noted that a dumpster used for containing facility trash and recycling material was left open, with the lid flipped back, exposing boxes and bags of trash. This observation was made in the presence of the Dietary Manager, who acknowledged that the dumpster should have been closed and not left open. This failure to properly contain waste created the potential for insect and pest infestation, potentially affecting all 90 residents residing in the facility.
Failure to Honor Resident Choice for TV During Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the residents' rights for self-determination by not accommodating their preference to have the television on during meals. This deficiency was observed in three residents who expressed their desire to watch TV while eating. Despite their requests, a CNA turned off the TV during meals, citing a need to avoid distractions. The residents expressed their dissatisfaction with this action, indicating a lack of consistency in staff behavior regarding the TV being on during meals. Interviews with residents and staff revealed that some staff members would turn off the TV while others would not, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction among the residents. The facility's Resident Rights document supports the residents' right to make choices about significant aspects of their lives, yet there was no specific policy regarding the TV being on during meals. The facility's administration acknowledged that the TV could be left on during meals if the residents requested it, as it is their home and their choice.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a fall prevention intervention for a resident who was identified as a fall risk. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for mobility and transfers, experienced a fall from her bed, resulting in a bruise on her right cheek. Despite the interdisciplinary team's recommendation to place a low bed and a fall mat next to the resident's bed, observations revealed that the impact floor mat was not present during subsequent checks. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including abnormalities of gait and mobility, and had a history of falls. A fall risk evaluation confirmed the resident's fall risk status. However, during observations and staff interviews, it was confirmed that the fall mat, which was part of the resident's care plan to enhance safety, was not in place. This oversight was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing, who stated that the mat was intended to reduce the likelihood of injury if the resident fell.
Failure to Offer Pneumococcal Vaccination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine they were eligible to receive, as evidenced by the records of two residents. Resident #31, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including stroke and muscle weakness, had received the PPSV23 vaccine in 2013 and the PCV13 vaccine in 2015. However, there was no documentation of shared decision-making between Resident #31 and/or his representative and his primary care physician regarding the administration of the PCV20 vaccine. Similarly, Resident #52, admitted with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease and muscle weakness, had received the PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccines before turning the age recommended for the PCV20 vaccine. His records also lacked documentation of shared decision-making with his physician about the PCV20 vaccination. During an interview, the Infection Preventionist confirmed that the facility did not have a process in place to facilitate shared decision-making between residents and physicians regarding the PCV20 vaccine.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 220 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Nampa
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orchards Of Cascadia, The | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 1 |
| Meadow View Nursing And Rehabilitation | 4.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Sunny Ridge | 4.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Karcher Post Acute | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Wellspring Health & Rehabilitation Of Cascadia | 5.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Cascadia Of Nampa.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.