Citations in Idaho
Statistics, citations and compliance trends for long-term care facilities in Idaho.
Statistics for Idaho (Last 12 Months)
Financial Impact (Last 12 Months)
Latest citations in Idaho
Unqualified Culinary Manager Overseeing Food and Nutrition Services: The facility failed to ensure its Culinary Manager met the required qualifications to direct food and nutrition services when a full-time qualified dietician was not employed. The CM stated she had worked at the facility since August 2025, had only cook and kitchen manager experience, and no certification documentation was provided. The CEO confirmed the CM did not have the required qualifications and was in the process of getting certified.
The facility failed to keep the kitchen hood clean, removed moldy cantaloupe from storage only after it was observed, allowed a staff drink to be stored in the kitchen freezer, and observed an employee washing hands for only four seconds with visible substance still on the arm before serving food. Food and refrigerator temperature logs were incomplete, and the activities refrigerator was found with condensation, black buildup, and temperatures above the safe range while the AD reported freezer temperatures were not being checked.
QAPI monitoring was deficient when the facility failed to ensure performance improvement activities were properly implemented and tracked for incomplete skin assessments and food labeling issues in the snack room. The CEO stated there were three PIPs, but benchmark measurements were not consistently documented, one PIP remained active after completion because the facility did not want to fall off track, and the current measurement method did not adequately track whether improvement had occurred since implementation.
A resident with CKD, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking had a care plan for impaired mobility and fall risk that directed staff to keep the call light within reach. Surveyors observed the resident seated in a chair with the call light clipped to the wall on the opposite side of the bed and out of reach; the resident said it was always there. The CNO stated the resident spent most of the day in the chair and preferred the call light clipped to the wall, and this preference was not care planned.
Failure to Monitor Ordered Vital Signs: A resident with COPD, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and CHF had a provider order for daily vital signs, but the MAR showed an O2 sat of 87% with no follow-up vitals documented and another day with no vitals documented at all. Nursing notes did not show follow-up monitoring or documentation of the low O2 reading, and the CNO stated vitals were recorded on the night shift but not entered into the record or explained when the day-shift vitals were not completed as ordered.
Failure to complete a restraint assessment before using a wheelchair alarm for a resident with muscle weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, and dementia. The care plan included the alarm as an intervention, but the record lacked an initial Restraint Evaluation, and the CNO confirmed the assessment had not been completed before the alarm was placed.
Unqualified Culinary Manager Overseeing Food and Nutrition Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the designated Culinary Manager met the required professional qualifications for overseeing food and nutrition services. The SOM, Appendix PP, stated that when a qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, the facility must designate a director of food and nutrition services who meets specified qualifications, including certification or education and experience requirements. The facility’s Culinary Manager position description also required ServSafe Food Safety Certification and one of several additional credentials, such as a Certified Dietary Manager, Certified Food Protection Professional, Dietetic Technician, Registered, or certification with the American Culinary Federation. During interview, the Culinary Manager stated she had worked at the facility since August 2025 and was overseen by the facility’s RD, who worked one day per week. Documentation of the Culinary Manager’s certification was requested, but no certification was provided on multiple occasions. When asked about her background, the Culinary Manager stated she had two years of experience as a cook and one year of experience as a kitchen manager at a boarding school. The CEO later confirmed the Culinary Manager did not have the required qualifications and was in the process of getting certified.
Kitchen sanitation, food safety, and temperature monitoring failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep the kitchen cooking hood clean. On 7/10/26 at 9:43 AM, the gray kitchen cooking hood vent was observed with a layer of brown particles on the outside of the hood vent. When asked about the kitchen cleaning schedule, the CM stated kitchen staff were to clean vents once per week, and when asked about the cooking hood vent, the CM stated she did not think the kitchen staff realized that it was also considered a vent. The facility failed to ensure food items were free from mold. On 7/10/26 at 9:16 AM, a box labeled cantaloupe was observed on a lower wire rack shelf in the dry storage area. Three cantaloupes were in the box, and one had a large oblong white fuzzy substance on it that was in contact with the other two cantaloupes. When asked about fruit ordering and inspection, the CM stated fruit was received every two weeks and inspected when staff went to use it. The CM identified the cantaloupe as bad, stated it had been ordered on 6/25/26, and removed the box from storage. The CM also stated the cantaloupe was white and moldy and should have been pulled on 6/30/26. The facility failed to prevent contamination risks related to staff practices and food safety monitoring. On 7/7/26 at 8:22 AM, a McDonald's cup containing a dark liquid was observed in the kitchen freezer, and [NAME] #1 stated the cup was theirs. The CM later stated personal drinks should not be kept in the freezer. On 7/9/26, [NAME] #2 was observed washing his hands for four seconds during tray line preparation at multiple times, and later had a cream, off-white substance stuck to the back of his right arm that was not washed off before serving food. The CM stated employees should be vigorously washing their hands for 20 seconds. The facility also failed to record required food and refrigerator temperatures. Food Temperature Logs for May 2026 through July 2026 showed missing food temperatures for multiple meals, including 5/17/26 dinner, 5/22/26 lunch, 5/23/26 breakfast, lunch, and dinner, 5/26/26 dinner, and 6/15/26 dinner. The CM stated puree food temperatures were recorded under minced and moist and that she did not catch that temperatures were not being done. The activities refrigerator temperature log for June 2026 was missing temperatures for 6/27/26 through 6/30/26, and the log had freezer sections crossed out even though ice cream bars were stored in the freezer. The AD stated he only checked refrigerator temperatures, did not check freezer temperatures, was the only staff member checking temperatures on weekdays, and temperatures were not checked on Saturdays and Sundays. On 7/9/26, the activities refrigerator was observed with condensation, black buildup on the lower shelf, and a thermometer reading above the safe line at 51 degrees; the AD later confirmed the refrigerator was at 42 degrees and stated it would not be appropriate to use anything in the refrigerator.
QAPI Monitoring Deficiencies for Skin Assessments and Food Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure good faith efforts were made to implement and monitor performance improvement activities related to skin assessments and food sanitation. Based on the facility's QAPI Committee policy, QAPI Plan, and staff interview, the committee was expected to identify performance improvement opportunities through tracking and trending of data and to monitor progress toward goals by comparing results to benchmarks and historical performance. During interview, the CEO stated the facility had three performance improvement plans. He reported that PIP #1 addressed incomplete skin assessments and was initiated on 3/30/26 and completed the following week on 4/6/26, but it remained active because the facility did not want to fall off track. He also stated PIP #1 did not include documented benchmark measurements, although percentages were used. For PIP #2, which addressed food labeling issues in the snack room and was initiated on 5/2/26, he stated benchmark measurement was documented as improved, but percentages were not used. He stated PIP #3 was complete and no longer in place, but did not provide additional information about it. He further stated the current method used to measure performance improvement plans did not adequately track whether improvement had occurred since the date of implementation.
Care Plan Not Revised to Match Resident Preference and Current Setup
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect current needs and interventions. The facility policy titled, "Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences," stated that each resident must have a timely, person-centered, comprehensive care plan that is developed, maintained, reviewed, and revised by an interdisciplinary team and updated as needed based on changes in condition or response to interventions. Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The resident’s care plan, initiated 5/7/26, identified impaired mobility with risk for falls related to use of an assistive device for ambulation and included the intervention to keep the call light and bedside table items within reach. However, on 7/7/26 the resident was observed seated in a chair next to the bed with the call light clipped to the wall on the opposite side of the bed and out of reach. The resident stated the call light was always there. A RCNA later confirmed the call button was out of reach and stated it should be clipped to the bed next to the chair. The CNO stated the resident spent most of the day in the chair and had the call light clipped to the wall on the opposite side of the bed because he did not like it clipped on the bed, and confirmed the resident’s preference to have it out of reach was not care planned.
Failure to Monitor Ordered Vital Signs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor vital signs as ordered by the physician for Resident #46, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including COPD with acute exacerbation, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and congestive heart failure. The facility policy titled Vital Signs stated that vital signs are to be taken as ordered by the provider and documented immediately after measurement, and that abnormal or concerning vital signs must be reported to the licensed nurse for assessment and intervention. A physician order dated 5/19/26 directed that Resident #46's vital signs be taken once daily during the day shift. The June 2026 MAR documented an oxygen saturation of 87% on 6/5/26 with no follow-up vital signs documented, and no vital signs documented on 6/6/26. The resident's nursing progress notes did not document follow-up vital sign monitoring or that the oxygen saturation was below 88%. The CNO stated that there was no documentation of follow-up measures or monitoring related to the low oxygen reading on 6/5/26, and that on 6/6/26 the night shift recorded vitals but did not enter them into the medical record or document why the vitals were not taken during the day shift as ordered.
Failure to complete restraint assessment before wheelchair alarm use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a restraint assessment before implementing a wheelchair alarm for Resident #18. Resident #18 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, and dementia. The care plan for impaired mobility and fall risk, dated 3/8/26, included a wheelchair alarm as an intervention. A Bed Safety and Transfer Device Evaluation dated 4/28/26 documented that the bed/chair alarm did not restrict mobility, but the record did not include an initial Restraint Evaluation dated on or around 3/8/26 to identify the comprehensive evaluation of the chair alarm. On 7/9/26, the CNO stated that a Restraint Evaluation had not been completed prior to the chair alarm being placed for Resident #18.
Find your facility
Search by name to see its inspection history, citations and penalties — and how to prepare for the next survey.
Get alerted when Immediate Jeopardy citations hit in Idaho — free
You're all set
Compliance trends in Idaho
Data through Jun 2026Comparisons below measure the most recent period Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 against the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025 (two equal 12-month windows). The most recent 1 months are excluded because CMS is still publishing them.
Top tags by month · last 24 months
dashed = still reportingMonthly citation counts for the 5 most-cited tags. The dashed tail is the 1-month reporting lag.
Frequency movers
Biggest change in how often each tag is cited, as a rate per 100 inspections (so it isn't skewed by survey volume): Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. Only tags with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown.
Severity movers
Tags whose average scope/severity shifted the most: Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. The number is the average severity on the A–L scale (A=0…L=11); the letter is the band it falls in. A rise means the same tag is being cited at a more serious level — note the average can move enough to rank here while staying within the same letter. Same 20-citation minimum applies.
Care domain movers
Citations grouped into CFR care domains — F-tags by their §483 regulatory section (CMS State Operations Manual, Appendix PP) — measured as a rate per 100 inspections: Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. Share is the domain's portion of citations this period; avg severity is the mean scope/severity letter and immediate jeopardy the percentage cited at J–L, both over the current period. Domains with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown; the sparkline tracks the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Immediate jeopardies · this period
Citations at the most serious scope/severity — J–L, immediate jeopardy, residents placed at risk of serious harm or death — over Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025. "Surveys with an IJ" counts distinct health inspections that had at least one.
Survey activity · by month
faded/dashed = still reportingCitations each month split into complaint-driven (unscheduled, triggered by grievances) vs standard surveys — bars, left axis — with the number of inspections as a line on the right axis. Rising inspections signal more scrutiny; a rising complaint share means more off-cycle surveys. The most recent 1 months are still being reported.
Deficiency-free survey rate
Share of health surveys that found zero deficiencies — the odds of a clean survey. Jul 2025 – Jun 2026 vs the prior period Jul 2024 – Jun 2025; the most recent 1 months are still being reported (dashed).
Penalties · by month
faded = still reportingTotal civil money penalty dollars imposed on the state's facilities each month — how hard the state is enforcing. The most recent 1 months are still being reported, and penalties often lag citations by several months.
Emerging tags
Tags that weren't established last period but surged — an early warning, distinct from movers (which track already-common tags). Criteria: fewer than 20 citations in the prior period, but at least 10 this period and 2.5× their prior volume. The sparkline shows monthly counts over the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.
