Citations in Idaho
Statistics, citations and compliance trends for long-term care facilities in Idaho.
Statistics for Idaho (Last 12 Months)
Financial Impact (Last 12 Months)
Latest citations in Idaho
Kitchen staff failed to properly label and store food items and did not follow hand hygiene and glove-use practices during meal prep. Observations found opened food items in the fridge, freezer, and pantry without required open or used-by dates, including resident-labeled foods stored with kitchen items. Staff were also observed handling trash and then returning to cooking without washing hands, and changing tasks while continuing food prep without proper hand hygiene or glove changes.
Failure to provide a dignified dining experience: Four residents with significant diagnoses, including Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, cerebral palsy, TBI, and dysphagia, were brought to the assistive dining room for lunch but were not served their trays until more than 50 minutes after the posted mealtime. While other residents were already being assisted with eating, these residents were left watching the meal service, and the DON stated they should have been served at the same time as the others or not brought in until their trays were ready.
Call lights were not kept within reach for five residents reviewed for residents' rights. Residents with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, stroke, TBI, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, PTSD, diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, OCD, and unsteadiness on feet were observed with call lights placed under beds, hung on wall hooks out of reach, or coiled and pinned so they could not independently access them. An LPN and the DON stated the call lights should have been within the residents' reach.
The facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and homelike environment. Surveyors observed dirty hallway vents, ceiling areas with residue, damaged walls, protruding door panel edges, missing tile and cracked flooring in shower areas, and multiple unsanitary conditions in resident rooms, including cracked light covers with bugs, uncovered soiled items, and substances on floors, mattresses, bed sheets, and bedside tables. Two residents’ wheelchairs also had dried substances and hair buildup, and staff acknowledged some areas needed repair or cleaning.
Failure to follow bowel management protocol: three residents had extended periods without a BM and no documented nursing interventions despite the facility’s protocol requiring specific measures after 2, 3, 4, and 5 days without a BM. The residents had significant diagnoses including schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, stroke, TBI, and Alzheimer’s disease, and the RNC confirmed the missing BM-related interventions in the chart.
The facility failed to promptly notify resident representatives when two residents fell and had changes in condition. One resident with dementia and anxiety fell in the TV room and sustained a chin laceration, and another resident with schizophrenia, anxiety, and an unsteady gait had a witnessed fall in her room with a left upper arm skin tear. In both cases, the provider was notified and treatment orders were received, but the records did not document representative notification at the time of the events.
Improper Food Storage, Labeling, and Hand Hygiene in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
Kitchen staff failed to appropriately store and label food items in accordance with the facility’s Food Receiving and Storage policy and the FDA Food Code. On observation in the kitchen, an opened bag of lettuce had a used-by date of 8/2/26, a container of pink liquid punch had no open or used-by date, and several opened resident-labeled food items were stored in the kitchen refrigerator, including tomato cocktail, cream cheese, potato salad, a jar of mayonnaise, and a package of sandwich bologna. In the reach-in freezer, an opened bag of frozen egg omelets and an opened bag of pizzas had no open or used-by dates. In the pantry, an opened gallon container of vanilla syrup had a used-by date of 6/17/26, and an opened 12 oz pancake syrup bottle had a used-by date of 8/2/26. Kitchen staff also failed to follow hand hygiene and glove-use practices during food preparation. One staff member was observed handling food waste with bare hands, lifting the trash can lid with bare hands, and then returning to cooking duties without washing hands before pouring soup into bowls for residents. Another staff member was observed cutting celery with gloved hands, opening a cupboard and moving bowls, then returning to the cutting task and handling the cut celery without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. The same staff member removed one glove to get glasses to read a recipe, then donned another glove without washing hands before resuming food preparation. The Maintenance Manager, acting as food service manager, stated that food items in the refrigerator and freezers should have been labeled with used-by dates and that proper hand hygiene practices were not being followed.
Failure to Provide Dignified Dining Experience
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 4 of 8 residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility’s Assistance with Meals policy stated that staff will serve resident trays and help residents who require assistance with eating, and that residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity. The facility’s Dignity policy stated that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances well-being, satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem, and that residents are supported in exercising their rights during care. Resident #4 had diagnoses including Parkinson’s Disease and major depressive disorder. Resident #13 had diagnoses including schizophrenia and abnormal involuntary movement. Resident #19 had diagnoses including spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and anxiety disorder. Resident #44 had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and dysphagia. During observation of the assistive dining room during the lunch meal, eight residents were present and only four were being assisted with eating after their meals had been delivered. Residents #4, #13, #19, and #44 were not served their lunch trays until after 12:10 PM, more than 50 minutes past the posted lunch mealtime, and were observed watching other residents who were already being assisted with their meals. The DON stated these residents should have been served at the same time as the other residents or not brought into the dining room until their trays were ready.
Call Lights Not Within Reach for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 5 of 18 residents reviewed for residents' rights: Residents #29, #50, #51, #56, and #57. The facility's policy, "Answering the Call Light," revised September 2022, stated that call lights should be accessible to residents when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility, and from the floor. Resident #51, who had diagnoses including acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder, was observed with the call light button under the bed against the wall and not accessible. Resident #56, who had diagnoses including stroke, traumatic brain injury, and Alzheimer's disease, was observed lying in bed without the call light button, which was hanging on a wall hook about five feet high and out of reach; she was unable to self-ambulate, could not get out of bed, and did not verbally communicate. Resident #29, who had diagnoses including schizophrenia, PTSD, and diabetes, was observed with the call light plugged into the wall above the bed, hanging down to the floor under the bed and not within independent reach. Resident #57, who had diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety, and unsteadiness on feet, was observed with the call light plugged into the wall above the bed with the cord coiled and pinned to itself and not within independent reach. Resident #50, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and OCD, was observed with the call light plugged into the wall near the foot of the bed, coiled and pinned to itself and not within reach. Staff interviews confirmed the call lights for these residents should have been within reach and were not.
Cleanliness, Safety, and Equipment Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, and homelike environment. Surveyors observed multiple areas of disrepair and cleanliness concerns throughout the building, including shower room flooring with dark residue and chipped, open penetrations, hallway vents and ceiling areas with black, gray, and cobweb-like substances, wall gouges, and dining room ceiling vents and lights with dry splattering and rust-colored residue. The facility’s maintenance manager and maintenance director stated they were aware of some of the shower room and panel issues and knew repairs were needed. Surveyors also observed unsafe conditions in resident areas and common spaces. Plastic door panels outside two rooms had protruding edges, the south hall shower room had two large holes where tile was missing and a smaller crack, and staff acknowledged the flooring needed correction. In resident rooms, surveyors observed cracked light covers containing bugs, gouges in walls and railings, a missing bathroom door, a thick black substance at a room entrance threshold, and uncovered soiled items such as an isolation bin with soiled linen and a bedpan on the floor under the sink. Equipment cleanliness concerns were also identified. Two residents’ wheelchairs had dried substances on the cushions and wheels, with hair accumulated in the wheel mechanisms, and a CNA stated night shift should have cleaned the wheelchairs. In another room, surveyors observed mattresses with dried brown and white substances, a mattress leaning against the wall with dried white substance, dried substances on the floor and bed sheets, and a bedside table with dried brown substance. Facility logs reviewed did not document cleaning of hallway vents, mats, or mattresses at the bedside, and the Housekeeping Supervisor stated vents should have been cleaned and that nurse aides were responsible for cleaning body fluids from mattresses and mats before housekeeping cleaned them.
Failure to Follow Bowel Management Protocol
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its Bowel Management - Clinical Protocol for residents who did not have a bowel movement within the required time frame. The protocol dated April 2026 directed staff to assess, monitor, and manage bowel and bladder function according to individualized needs and physician/provider orders, with specific interventions beginning on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5 without a BM. For Resident #31, the record documented no BM from 7/27/26 at 2146 to 7/31/26 at 2130, with no documented nursing interventions during that period. Resident #31 had diagnoses including schizophrenia and alcohol abuse. Resident #4’s record documented no BM from 7/9/26 to 7/12/26 with no documented nursing interventions related to the lack of BM during that time. Resident #4 had diagnoses including Parkinson’s Disease and major depressive disorder. Resident #56’s record documented no BM from 7/21/26 to 7/28/26 and again from 7/29/26 to 8/2/26, with no documented nursing interventions during those periods. Resident #56 had diagnoses including stroke, traumatic brain injury, and Alzheimer’s disease. On 8/5/26, the RNC stated that Residents #4, #31, and #56 had no documented BM-related interventions for July and the first part of August 2026 and should have.
Failure to Notify Resident Representatives After Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents’ representatives were immediately notified when residents fell or had a change in condition. The facility policy, revised in February 2021, stated that the resident, attending physician, and resident representative are to be promptly notified of changes in the resident’s medical or mental condition and/or status. Survey review found that this did not occur for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for changes in condition. Resident #7, who had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety, fell while walking out of the doorway in the TV room and sustained a laceration to the chin. The provider was notified and orders were given for steri-strips and monitoring, but the record did not document that the resident’s representative was notified at the time of the fall. Resident #57, who had diagnoses including schizophrenia, anxiety, and unsteady gait, had a witnessed fall in her room and sustained a skin tear to the left upper arm. The provider and DON were notified and treatment orders were received, but the record did not document that the resident’s representative was notified at the time of the event.
Find your facility
Search by name to see its inspection history, citations and penalties — and how to prepare for the next survey.
Get alerted when Immediate Jeopardy citations hit in Idaho — free
You're all set
Compliance trends in Idaho
Data through Jul 2026Comparisons below measure the most recent period Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 against the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025 (two equal 12-month windows). The most recent 1 months are excluded because CMS is still publishing them.
Top tags by month · last 24 months
dashed = still reportingMonthly citation counts for the 5 most-cited tags. The dashed tail is the 1-month reporting lag.
Frequency movers
Biggest change in how often each tag is cited, as a rate per 100 inspections (so it isn't skewed by survey volume): Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. Only tags with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown.
Severity movers
Tags whose average scope/severity shifted the most: Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. The number is the average severity on the A–L scale (A=0…L=11); the letter is the band it falls in. A rise means the same tag is being cited at a more serious level — note the average can move enough to rank here while staying within the same letter. Same 20-citation minimum applies.
Care domain movers
Citations grouped into CFR care domains — F-tags by their §483 regulatory section (CMS State Operations Manual, Appendix PP) — measured as a rate per 100 inspections: Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. Share is the domain's portion of citations this period; avg severity is the mean scope/severity letter and immediate jeopardy the percentage cited at J–L, both over the current period. Domains with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown; the sparkline tracks the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Immediate jeopardies · this period
Citations at the most serious scope/severity — J–L, immediate jeopardy, residents placed at risk of serious harm or death — over Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. "Surveys with an IJ" counts distinct health inspections that had at least one.
Survey activity · by month
faded/dashed = still reportingCitations each month split into complaint-driven (unscheduled, triggered by grievances) vs standard surveys — bars, left axis — with the number of inspections as a line on the right axis. Rising inspections signal more scrutiny; a rising complaint share means more off-cycle surveys. The most recent 1 months are still being reported.
Deficiency-free survey rate
Share of health surveys that found zero deficiencies — the odds of a clean survey. Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025; the most recent 1 months are still being reported (dashed).
Penalties · by month
faded = still reportingTotal civil money penalty dollars imposed on the state's facilities each month — how hard the state is enforcing. The most recent 1 months are still being reported, and penalties often lag citations by several months.
Emerging tags
Tags that weren't established last period but surged — an early warning, distinct from movers (which track already-common tags). Criteria: fewer than 20 citations in the prior period, but at least 10 this period and 2.5× their prior volume. The sparkline shows monthly counts over the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.
