Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Arrowhead Post Acute Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in food safety and sanitation, including undated food items in the walk-in cooler, unclean kitchen equipment and surfaces, incomplete dish machine temperature logs, and improper handling and storage of ice scoops. These issues were confirmed by the Dietary Manager, ADON, and Administrator, and had the potential to affect all residents receiving oral diets from the kitchen.
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in 16 resident rooms and several common areas, including exposed electrical holes, broken furniture, water damage, mildew, missing fixtures, and accumulations of dirt and debris. Facility staff confirmed many of these issues had not been addressed or were previously unrecognized, with some problems persisting for weeks.
The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by multiple residents reporting frequent sightings of roaches, water bugs, and gnats in their rooms and common areas. Despite documented complaints and a policy requiring ongoing pest management, pest control services were inconsistently provided, with significant gaps between treatments and continued pest activity noted during service visits.
Three residents who wished to vote were not provided with the necessary assistance or information to participate in elections, due to lack of follow-up, communication, and support from staff, as well as issues with identification and transportation.
A resident with cognitive capacity was not invited to participate in her person-centered care plan meetings. Despite multiple care plan revisions and the resident's ability to participate, there was no documentation or evidence that she was informed of or included in these meetings. Staff responsible for scheduling and documenting care plan meetings could not provide records showing the resident's invitation or participation.
A resident with a signed DNR order and hospice admission was incorrectly listed as full code in the EMR, care plan, physician's orders, and code status book. Multiple staff, including LPNs and the DON, relied on this inaccurate information and would have initiated CPR, contrary to the resident's documented wishes. Hospice nurses confirmed the resident's DNR status, but the facility's documentation and communication failures placed the resident at risk of not having end-of-life preferences honored.
Three residents with significant physical or cognitive impairments did not have comprehensive care plans addressing their documented needs. One resident's preferences for specific activities and management of lower extremity edema were not included in the care plan, another resident with contractures and pressure ulcers lacked a care plan for contracture management and pressure relief, and a third resident's activity preferences were not addressed in the care plan despite being assessed as important.
The facility did not ensure that care plans were properly developed, reviewed, and revised for several residents, including a resident with a history of stroke who did not receive prescribed heel protectors, a resident whose care plan conferences were not completed as required, and a resident whose care plan lacked interventions for incontinence and transfer assistance. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed these deficiencies, which were not in line with facility policy and regulatory requirements.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and total incontinence did not receive required incontinence care or ADL assistance over several hours, despite documented needs and observed signs of discomfort. Staff failed to perform incontinence checks or provide care during this period, and the care plan lacked instructions for a check and change program.
Three residents with varying cognitive and physical abilities did not receive adequate activity engagement, as care plans were not fully implemented, documentation of invitations and participation was lacking, and staff failed to coordinate to ensure residents were informed of and assisted to attend preferred activities.
A resident with severe contractures, cognitive impairment, and existing pressure ulcers was repeatedly observed without a pressure-relieving device between the knees. Staff used a foam wedge or a folded sheet, but not a dedicated device, and the wound care nurse was unaware of any such device being used. This failure to provide appropriate pressure ulcer prevention measures led to a deficiency.
Two residents did not receive their prescribed controlled medications for anxiety and pain due to delays in pharmacy delivery and failure by nursing staff to utilize available emergency medication supplies. Despite existing procedures and policies for reordering and accessing medications, staff did not ensure timely administration, resulting in missed doses for both residents.
Expired medications, including Pro-Stat Nutricia, blood glucose control solution, and extra-strength antacids, were found in a medication cart on the Left Wing. An LPN confirmed the items were expired, and interviews revealed that while staff are expected to check for expired drugs, there was no consistent system in place to ensure this was done, leading to the deficiency.
A resident with dysphagia and a physician's order for speech therapy did not receive a timely evaluation due to a breakdown in communication between nursing and the therapy department. The order for speech therapy was not relayed to the therapy team until the resident complained about her pureed diet, resulting in a delayed screening and evaluation.
A resident who was non-ambulatory and assessed as not at risk for wandering had their wander guard removed, but the EMR still contained an active order to check the device daily. Nursing staff continued to document completion of this task on the MAR, despite the device no longer being in use, resulting in inaccurate documentation of care provided.
A resident was prescribed doxycycline for an upper respiratory infection without documented evidence of an active infection, as required by facility policy. The infection control log lacked necessary details such as lab results and symptoms, and the Infection Preventionist had not reviewed lab or x-ray findings to confirm the need for antibiotics or their appropriateness.
Surveyors found that several resident rooms and main hall areas lacked proper ventilation due to non-functional bathroom fans and dirty vents, resulting in poor air circulation and noticeable odors. Maintenance staff and administration confirmed these issues, citing staffing shortages and incomplete maintenance records, with only monthly filter changes documented.
Deficient Food Safety and Sanitation Practices in Kitchen and Ice Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper food safety and sanitation practices in the kitchen and food service areas. During observations, undated food items such as shredded lettuce and English peas were found in the walk-in cooler, and the Dietary Manager confirmed these items were not labeled or dated. The kitchen environment was noted to be unclean, with dust and grease accumulation on a portable air conditioning unit, vents, and behind cooking equipment. Ceiling tiles throughout the kitchen were discolored and stained, with one tile sagging above the vent hood. Additionally, temperature logs for the dish machine were incomplete, with no records for two consecutive days prior to dishwashing. The kitchen was also found to be excessively warm due to a non-functioning air conditioner, with a thermostat reading of 84 degrees, and a large fan used for cooling was covered in sticky dust. Maintenance issues, including the broken air conditioning, were not documented in the facility's maintenance request system. Further deficiencies were observed in the handling and storage of ice. An uncovered and visibly dirty ice scoop was found in a cracked and broken container on the ice chest cart. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the condition of the scoop and container, noting that the scoop should be covered and the container replaced. The Administrator later confirmed awareness of the issue and stated that new ice scoops and containers had been ordered. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all 77 residents receiving oral diets from the kitchen, as they could be exposed to foodborne illness due to improper food storage, unsanitary kitchen conditions, and inadequate ice handling practices.
Failure to Maintain Safe, Clean, and Sanitary Environment in Resident Rooms and Common Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment in 16 of 47 resident rooms, the main dining room, and both the right and left wing day rooms. Observations revealed multiple deficiencies, including exposed holes in walls where electrical outlets were missing, jagged and peeling veneer on nightstands, loose and unsecured furniture, broken and crumbling tiles, and water-damaged flooring. In several rooms, there were also instances of mildew or black stains on walls and ceilings, missing toilet paper holders, plungers stored directly on the floor, and loose or wobbly toilets. Staff interviews confirmed that some of these issues had been present for weeks and that maintenance and housekeeping staff were not always aware of the problems until pointed out during the survey. Common areas such as the day rooms and main dining room were observed with scratched or peeling paint, stained and dirty walls, sticky countertops, and accumulations of dust, dirt, and cobwebs. Additional issues included broken tiles, missing trim, gaps in exit doors large enough for pests to enter, and a general buildup of grime and debris in corners and along baseboards. In several resident rooms, there were broken or missing light covers, unsecured or broken furniture, water leaks, and warped dressers. Some bathrooms had missing or broken fixtures, stained or dirty commode seats, and evidence of water damage that had not been cleaned or repaired. During the environmental tour, facility staff including the Administrator, DON, Maintenance Director Assistant, Housekeeping Director, and regional corporate staff confirmed the presence of these deficiencies. Staff acknowledged that some repairs and cleaning tasks had not been completed, and in some cases, they were unaware of the extent of the issues until the survey. The facility had recently been without a Maintenance Director, which contributed to delays in addressing maintenance and environmental concerns.
Failure to Maintain Effective Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as required by its own policy, which states that the building should be kept free of insects and rodents through an ongoing pest control program. Record review and interviews revealed that several residents reported the presence of roaches, water bugs, gnats, and other pests in their rooms and common areas, such as bathrooms and shower rooms. Resident Council Minutes documented multiple complaints about pest infestations, with the facility's stated response being to schedule monthly exterminator visits. However, pest control logs showed inconsistent service, with significant gaps between treatments and no evidence of monthly extermination as promised. Multiple residents, most of whom had intact cognition as indicated by their BIMS scores, described frequent sightings of pests in their rooms and throughout the facility. Some residents attributed the pest issues to factors such as trash bins being kept in hallways and food being left on the floor. One resident reported being so disturbed by the pests that a family member had to spray the room for bugs to allow her to sleep. The facility's pest control records confirmed pest activity during service visits, but did not demonstrate a consistent or effective approach to pest management, leading to ongoing resident complaints and observations of pests in living areas.
Failure to Facilitate Residents' Right to Vote
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three residents were able to exercise their right to vote in elections through absentee ballots or other authorized methods, as required by their own policy and federal regulations. The policy stated that residents should be encouraged to participate in community activities, including voting, and that transportation may be arranged through the Activity or Social Services Departments. However, review of facility records and interviews revealed that residents who expressed a desire to vote were not provided with adequate assistance or information to do so. One resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, stated that they wanted to vote but were not asked or informed about how to participate. Another resident, who was cognitively intact, was told they could not vote because their identification was expired and from another state, and no assistance was provided to obtain a valid ID. A third resident, also cognitively intact, had identification and expressed interest in voting upon admission, but was not asked about voting or provided with the opportunity, which the resident linked to feelings of depression. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of follow-up and communication regarding residents' interest in voting. The Social Services Director and Activities Director both acknowledged gaps in the process, including not revisiting new admissions to assess voting interest and not assisting residents in obtaining necessary identification or absentee ballots. Transportation issues and lack of coordination with families further contributed to the residents' inability to exercise their voting rights.
Failure to Invite Resident to Participate in Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that a resident was invited to participate in the development and implementation of her person-centered care plan. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, was found to be cognitively intact based on a BIMS score of 14 out of 15. Review of the care plan and associated documentation revealed no evidence that the resident had been invited to or participated in any care plan meetings, despite multiple revisions to her care plan over time. During interviews, the resident stated she was unaware of any care meetings involving staff from various departments and confirmed she had not attended such meetings, only participating in resident council meetings. The Social Services Designee (SSD), responsible for scheduling care plan meetings, indicated that family members were notified of meeting times and that sign-in sheets were maintained. However, the SSD was unable to provide documentation or sign-in sheets to demonstrate that the resident had been invited to or participated in her care plan meetings, even after multiple requests during the survey.
Failure to Honor Resident's Advance Directive Due to Inaccurate Code Status Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directive and code status were accurately reflected and communicated among staff and in the electronic medical record (EMR). Although the resident had a completed and signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order and was admitted to hospice care, the EMR, care plan, physician's orders, and code status book all indicated the resident was a full code, meaning all resuscitative measures would be taken in the event of a medical emergency. Multiple staff members, including LPNs, the MDS Coordinator, and the DON, all referenced the EMR and code status book, confirming that they would initiate CPR based on the information available, which was inconsistent with the resident's documented wishes and hospice status. Interviews with hospice nurses revealed that the resident had been DNR since admission to hospice, and there were signed DNR documents present. However, the facility's process for verifying and updating code status failed, as staff relied on outdated or incorrect information in the EMR and code status book. This discrepancy placed the resident at risk of not having her end-of-life wishes honored, as staff would have performed resuscitative measures contrary to the resident's documented DNR status.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that addressed all identified needs for three residents. One resident, who was cognitively intact but had severe visual impairment, expressed a strong preference for specific activities such as listening to music, keeping up with the news, participating in group activities, and going outside. Despite these preferences being documented in the MDS, the care plan did not reflect them, and the resident was observed sitting in her room with minimal activity involvement. Additionally, this resident had an active order for TED hose due to lower extremity edema, which was not addressed in the care plan, and the resident reported not wearing the hose since admission, despite ongoing documentation of edema in weekly assessments. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, and contractures was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had pressure ulcers. Observations revealed that this resident was not consistently provided with pressure-relieving devices between the knees, and there was no care plan specifically addressing contractures or pressure relief. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of such a care plan, despite the resident's significant physical limitations and risk factors. A third resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for mobility and ADLs, had documented preferences for a variety of activities, including religious services, music, and group events. However, the care plan did not address the resident's activity needs or participation, even though assessments indicated these were very important to the resident. Staff interviews confirmed that an activities care plan should have been in place but was not developed.
Failure to Develop and Revise Comprehensive Care Plans for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were developed, reviewed, and revised in accordance with regulatory requirements for several residents. For one resident with a history of stroke and severe cognitive impairment, the care plan included an intervention for the use of heel protectors to address skin impairment and pressure injury risk. However, observations revealed that heel protectors were not in use while the resident was in bed, and there was no current physician's order for them. Staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness regarding the intervention, and the care plan was subsequently revised to remove the heel protectors without clear documentation of the clinical decision-making process. Another resident, admitted with dementia and other neurological diagnoses, had care plan documentation that did not reflect timely quarterly care plan conferences. The care plan history showed only two completed care plans despite the resident's ongoing stay, and the Social Service Director was unable to explain the lack of regular care plan reviews. This failure to conduct and document regular care plan conferences limited the facility's ability to assess, review, and revise care plans as needed. Additionally, a resident with multiple physical disabilities and incontinence did not have a care plan that addressed incontinence management or specific transfer assistance needs. Staff interviews confirmed the resident was incontinent and required frequent checks and changes, but this was not reflected in the care plan. Similarly, the care plan did not specify the resident's transfer needs, despite staff routinely using two-person transfers and gait belts. Facility policies required care plans to be updated with such information, but this was not done, resulting in incomplete care planning for the resident.
Failure to Provide Incontinence Care and ADL Assistance
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, above-the-knee amputation, aphasia, and deafness did not receive appropriate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically incontinence care. The resident was documented as always incontinent and required a check and change program, as indicated in the Bladder Incontinence Evaluation. However, the resident's care plan did not address incontinence or the need for a check and change program, and the Kardex lacked specific instructions regarding incontinence care. Direct observation revealed that the resident remained in a geriatric chair in the day room for several hours without any incontinence checks by staff. The resident was moved between locations by staff and participated in activities, but at no point during the observed period was incontinence care provided. The resident exhibited signs of discomfort, such as yelling out and squirming in the chair, but staff did not respond with incontinence checks or care until the resident was eventually taken to their room.
Failure to Provide Sufficient Activity Engagement for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient activity engagement to meet the needs of three residents, as evidenced by observations, interviews, and record reviews. One resident, who was cognitively intact but severely visually impaired, expressed that she could not see and spent her time sitting and listening to the TV. Her care plan included interventions such as inviting her to scheduled activities and providing assistance, but there was no documentation of invitations or participation, and she was observed sitting in her room without engagement throughout the survey period. Another resident, who was severely cognitively impaired, deaf, and nonspeaking, had documented preferences for a variety of activities, including religious services, arts and crafts, and group events. Despite these preferences and family input indicating a need for more engagement, the resident's care plan did not address activity needs, and participation records showed only sporadic involvement in group activities like Bingo. Observations revealed long periods where the resident was left in a geriatric chair without engagement, and the Activities Director confirmed that one-to-one visits, which were indicated as needed, had not been implemented. A third resident, who was cognitively intact but dependent on staff for mobility and had a history of depression and stroke, also experienced insufficient activity engagement. Although his care plan called for one-to-one visits and a program of activities tailored to his interests, records showed minimal participation, and he reported not being informed about or assisted to attend activities he enjoyed, such as Bingo. Staff interviews revealed a lack of coordination between the Activities Director and nursing staff, resulting in the resident not being invited or assisted to attend group activities, and no one-to-one visits were provided despite being care planned.
Failure to Provide Pressure-Relieving Device for Resident with Contractures
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and contractures was not consistently provided with a pressure-relieving device between the knees, despite being dependent on staff for all functional abilities and having existing pressure ulcers. The resident was observed on multiple occasions with contracted legs drawn up tightly toward the buttocks and knees together, without any pressure-relieving device in place between the knees. During care observations, staff were seen positioning the resident with a foam wedge under the knee or a folded flat sheet between the knees, but not with a dedicated pressure-relieving device. The wound care nurse confirmed that she was not aware of any pressure-relieving device being used between the resident's knees. These findings indicate that the facility failed to ensure appropriate pressure ulcer prevention measures for this resident.
Failure to Provide Timely Controlled Medications Due to Pharmacy and Staff Oversight
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of two residents who required controlled medications for anxiety and pain management. One resident, admitted with diagnoses including seizures, aphasia, and deaf non-speaking, had a severely impaired cognitive status and was prescribed lorazepam for anxiety. Despite having a physician's order for lorazepam, multiple doses were not administered over several days due to delays in obtaining the medication from the pharmacy. Documentation in the electronic medical record indicated repeated notes of waiting for pharmacy delivery, and nursing staff confirmed the resident did not refuse the medication. Although lorazepam was available in the facility's emergency medication supply, it was not utilized to prevent missed doses. Another resident, admitted with a history of joint replacement and osteoarthritis, was prescribed tramadol for pain management. This resident, who was cognitively intact, reported to nursing staff that he had been without his pain medication for over two days. Nursing staff confirmed the medication had not been delivered and had not been administered as ordered. The facility had a process in place to access emergency medication supplies (Pyxis machine) in such situations, but this process was not followed, resulting in the resident not receiving pain medication as needed. Interviews with nursing staff and facility administration revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through regarding the availability and administration of these controlled medications. Staff acknowledged that procedures existed to obtain medications from emergency supplies when routine deliveries were delayed, but these procedures were not implemented. The facility's own policy required staff to check for pharmacy communications and contact the pharmacy for missing medications, but this was not effectively carried out, leading to missed doses for both residents.
Expired Medications Found in Medication Cart Due to Lack of Systematic Checks
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to remove expired medications from one of two medication carts located on the Left Wing. During an inspection of the medication cart at the nurses' station, an open bottle of Pro-Stat Nutricia with an expiration date of 5/16/2025, an unopened box of blood glucose control solution with an expiration date of 12/7/2024, and an open bottle of extra-strength antacids with an expiration date of 3/2025 were found. The LPN present confirmed that all these items were expired. Interviews with the LPN and the Administrator revealed that nursing staff are expected to check medication carts for expired medications, but there was no established system in place for ensuring this task is consistently performed. The facility's policies require that expired, discontinued, or deteriorated drugs be removed and either destroyed or returned to the pharmacy, but these procedures were not followed, resulting in expired medications being accessible in the medication cart.
Failure to Provide Timely Speech Therapy Evaluation for Swallowing Disorder
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident admitted with diagnoses including dysphagia, anxiety, depression, and failure to thrive did not receive timely speech therapy services as ordered to address a swallowing problem. The resident was admitted with a physician's order for a speech therapist to evaluate and treat as indicated, as well as an order for a pureed texture diet. Despite these orders, the speech therapy evaluation was not initiated promptly. The facility's policy required evaluations to be initiated within a reasonable time following receipt of a physician's order, but the order for speech therapy, entered on 5/28/2025, was not communicated to the therapy department until 6/9/2025. As a result, the resident did not receive a speech therapy screening until 6/11/2025. The delay was due to a breakdown in communication between nursing and the therapy department. Nursing staff were responsible for entering orders into the electronic medical record and communicating new orders to therapy via a screening request form. However, the Rehab Director and the speech therapist were unaware of the order until the resident expressed dissatisfaction with her food texture, prompting nursing to submit the screening request. During this period, the resident reported frustration with the pureed diet, had unclear speech, and exhibited drooling with loss of saliva control. Staff interviews confirmed that the communication process failed, resulting in the resident not receiving the ordered evaluation in a timely manner.
Inaccurate Documentation of Wander Guard Use for Non-Ambulatory Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the clinical record accurately reflected the care provided to a resident regarding the use of a wander guard device. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, seizures, aphasia, and was non-ambulatory and dependent on staff for all mobility and activities of daily living, was assessed as not being at risk for wandering or elopement. The resident's assessment documented that the wander guard was removed due to his inability to self-propel and lack of wandering behaviors. The care plan did not address wandering or elopement risk. Despite the removal of the wander guard, the electronic medical record (EMR) still contained an active physician's order to check the function of the wander guard daily, and nursing staff continued to initial on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that this was being completed. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident did not have a wander guard and that the order should have been discontinued, but staff were unaware that the order remained active and continued to document its completion inaccurately. This resulted in a misrepresentation of the care being provided, contrary to facility policy requiring accurate and factual documentation.
Failure to Ensure Appropriate Antibiotic Use Without Confirmed Infection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that antibiotics were not used without the presence of a diagnosed infection for one of three residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. According to the facility's policy, the Infection Control Coordinator or designee is required to complete a surveillance document using the McGeer criteria to confirm evidence of infection before antibiotics are administered, and to contact the physician if the criteria are not met. For one resident, documentation showed that doxycycline was prescribed for an upper respiratory infection, but the infection control log lacked information on the organism, x-ray results, lab or culture results, and did not include a section for symptoms or whether the infection met the required criteria. The resident's chest x-ray indicated no active disease or evidence of pneumonia, and there was no documentation of communication with the physician regarding the continued use of antibiotics in the absence of an active infection. The Infection Preventionist (IP) reported that she had not reviewed lab or x-ray results as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and relied on nurses' notes to determine the effectiveness of antibiotics. The IP also stated she did not have a process to determine if the prescribed antibiotic was appropriate based on organism susceptibility, as she did not have access to lab results. The IP confirmed that she had not reviewed the resident's use of doxycycline to determine if the infection met criteria or if the antibiotic was appropriate, and had not seen the relevant chest x-ray results.
Failure to Maintain Adequate Ventilation and Environmental Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain proper ventilation in six resident rooms and the main hall, resulting in inadequate air circulation and environmental hygiene. Specifically, bathroom ventilation fans were found to be non-operational in several rooms, and shared bathrooms had a heavy urine odor with exhaust vents that did not function, as confirmed by maintenance staff using tissue paper tests. Additionally, hallway ceiling vents and grates were covered in excessive dirt and debris, including blackened substances and thick, furry matter. These issues were confirmed during facility tours with the Maintenance Director Assistant, Housekeeping Director, Administrator, DON, and corporate staff. Interviews with facility staff revealed that although air filters were changed monthly, other aspects of ventilation maintenance, such as cleaning vents and ensuring fan operation, were not adequately addressed. The Administrator noted staffing shortages in the maintenance department, which contributed to the inability to keep up with required maintenance tasks. Maintenance records reviewed for the past year only documented filter changes, with no further details on other ventilation system upkeep.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 352 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Jonesboro
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverdale Center For Nursing And Healing | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Lake City Center For Nursing And Healing Llc | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| Jonesboro Center For Nursing And Healing Llc | 5.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Healthcare At College Park, Llc | 6.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Fulton Center For Rehabilitation Llc | 7.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Arrowhead Post Acute Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.