Regents Park Of Sunrise
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Sunrise, Florida.
- Location
- 9711 W Oakland Park Blvd, Sunrise, Florida 33351
- CMS Provider Number
- 105679
- Inspections on file
- 24
- Latest survey
- October 29, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 4 (1 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Regents Park Of Sunrise during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a known elopement risk exited the facility unsupervised through the main front door and was later found by police on a busy roadway. Staff were unaware of the resident's departure, did not hear any door alarms, and were not informed of the resident's elopement risk. The care plan was not updated to address exit-seeking behaviors, and technical issues with the door alarm system further contributed to the incident.
The facility failed to disburse funds within 30 days to representatives of three deceased residents. A resident's POA was in regular contact but experienced delays due to ownership changes. Another resident's account remained open without communication to the representative, and a third resident's funds were not disbursed due to lack of POA documentation. The facility did not meet the 30-day requirement for refunding resident funds.
A facility failed to promptly resolve a grievance from a resident's POA regarding funds reimbursement. The BOM cited a transition to new ownership and merging of accounts as reasons for the delay. Despite the POA's initial request for assistance, there was no documented follow-up until the POA contacted the facility again. The deficiency was identified due to the lack of timely communication and resolution.
The facility failed to implement an effective infection control program during a COVID-19 outbreak, as evidenced by the lack of N95 masks and eye protection in PPE carts, and staff using KN95 masks instead. Observations revealed inconsistencies in PPE availability and usage, with staff not following proper protocols, such as changing gowns between resident care and keeping room doors closed. Interviews highlighted a lack of clear responsibility for stocking PPE carts, contributing to the facility's failure to adhere to CDC and DOH recommendations.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and nutritional needs did not receive necessary dining assistance, resulting in multiple instances of untouched meal trays and a downward trend in weight. Staff provided conflicting information about the resident's ability to eat independently, and the required supervision was not consistently provided.
The facility failed to address a skin rash for a resident and new symptoms of a UTI for another resident in a timely manner. Despite orders for treatment, there were delays in administering medication and documenting follow-up actions. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness and proper communication among staff, leading to delayed care.
The facility failed to maintain physician oversight for a resident with worsening pressure wounds, leading to significant deterioration over several months. Despite the resident's worsening condition, there was a lack of consistent documentation and timely involvement of a wound care specialist. Interviews revealed concerns about the resident's nutrition and the adequacy of protein in her meals, which may have contributed to the issue.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses experienced significant weight loss and pressure ulcer development due to the facility's failure to provide timely nutritional interventions. Observations and interviews revealed discrepancies in tube feeding management and inadequate provision of prescribed nutritional supplements, leading to insufficient caloric and protein intake.
A facility failed to limit a new PRN order for Alprazolam for a resident with COPD, Syncope, Diabetes Type 2, and Anxiety Disorder. Despite a recommendation from the consultant pharmacist to discontinue or add a stop date, the physician disagreed without providing a rationale or indication for the duration of the PRN order.
Failure to Prevent Elopement Due to Lapses in Supervision, Communication, and Alarm System Functionality
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a known risk for elopement exited the facility unsupervised through the main front door. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, memory deficit, cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes, was found by police approximately half a mile away on a busy six-lane roadway after sunset. Facility staff were unaware that the resident had left the premises, and the resident was unable to communicate her address or destination to the police. The facility's policy required systematic monitoring and management of residents at risk for elopement, including timely response to alarms and implementation of care plan interventions, but these measures were not effectively executed. Interviews and record reviews revealed multiple lapses in supervision and communication. Staff members assigned to the resident did not know she was at risk for elopement, and no alarm or beeping sound was heard at the nurse's stations at the time of the incident. The care plan for the resident was not updated to reflect her elopement risk, and there were no interventions documented to address her behaviors of seeking to communicate with family or pacing near exit doors. Additionally, staff failed to redirect the resident or provide additional supervision when she expressed agitation and a desire to contact her daughter earlier in the day. Technical failures also contributed to the deficiency. The main lobby door's alarm system was not functioning as intended: the annunciator device on one wing was muted, and the other wing's device did not have a designated alarm switch for the main lobby door. Reception staff, who were responsible for monitoring the elopement risk binder and door alarms, were not aware of the resident's risk status. The front doors were left unattended and unlocked for a period in the evening, further compromising resident safety. These combined failures in supervision, communication, care planning, and alarm system functionality led to the resident's unsupervised exit and subsequent elopement.
Removal Plan
- Resident #1 returned to facility, placed on one-on-one supervision. Evaluation by LPN revealed no signs of injury or distress. Care Plan updated to reflect current care needs. A head count was conducted of current residents at the facility by RN supervisor. No concerns were identified.
- Current facility residents had elopement risk screens completed. Two additional residents triggered at risk for elopement. Orders and Care Plan were updated to reflect current needs based on updated Elopement Risk Evaluations.
- Elopement risk binders were reviewed to ensure they contain photos and demographic information of residents evaluated to be at risk for elopement. The surveyors reviewed and verified the 3 elopement binders located at the Receptionist desk, C Wing nurse's station and B Wing nurse's station were accurate.
- Elopement Drills to include door alarm drills conducted each shift. Education on elopement process, exit seeking behaviors and exit seeking behavior process/procedures discussed after each drill.
- Education for current staff initiated related to the facility Elopement/ Wandering Residents policy, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation, elopement/exit seeking behaviors identification, staff notification of elopement risk, location and contents of elopement risk binders, initiating enhanced supervision for residents actively exit seeking, responding to door alarms and proper actions to take once determined to be exit seeking or at risk for elopement. It also included the change to entry and exit of the facility through designated doors. Licensed nurses received specific education on exit seeking behavior and initiating appropriate care plan, orders and adding the elopement risk alert to the gray bar (this is in the electronic medical record and shows immediately below the picture of the resident in both the nurses charting system and the CNA charting system), immediately updating the elopement risk binders, creating a new elopement risk assessment in the computer and notifying nursing management. Receptionist received specific education followed by specific competencies on monitoring the door alarm system and notification to maintenance if a failure is identified, understanding the importance of the elopement binder and reviewing it at the beginning of each shift worked, and the proper procedures of resident LOA, signature for each oncoming and off-going shift on the clipboard indicating they had both appropriately initiated or deactivated the screamer alarm and for their review of the elopement binder, the process of utilizing the video doorbell for visitor/vendor entry and exit and notification of nursing manager if exit seeking behavior is identified.
- Education was conducted with IDT team on the process of identification, care planning, prevention, and response of elopement/exit seeking behaviors in morning meeting by progress/behavior note review and a review of the elopement risk UDAs, admission and readmission assessments (that contain the elopement risk evaluation for new residents) completed.
- Huddles are conducted at the beginning of each shift to discuss elopement risk and fall risk residents. This is an added communication to ensure staff are aware of at-risk residents.
- Door function and alarms were checked by the Administrator and the Maintenance Director, all doors and alarms were functioning appropriately. During the review by Maintenance Director, the C wing annunciator was noted to be muted. The volume of the annunciator was increased, and the button was disabled to remove the ability of staff to adjust the volume by vendor.
- Education provided by Staff Development Coordinator, DON and Administrator. All facility staff received education on the facility elopement/ Wandering Residents policy, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation, elopement/exit seeking behaviors identification, staff notification of elopement risk, location and contents of elopement risk binders, initiating enhanced supervision for residents actively exit seeking, responding to door alarms and proper actions to take once determined to be exit seeking or at risk for elopement. It also included the change to entry and exit of the facility through designated doors. All licensed nurses received education on exit seeking behavior and initiating appropriate care plan, orders and adding the elopement risk alert to the gray bar (this is in the electronic medical record and shows immediately below the picture of the resident in both the nurses charting system and the CNA charting system), immediately updating the elopement risk binders, creating a new elopement risk UDA and notifying nursing management. All receptionists have been educated on monitoring the door alarm system and notification to maintenance if a failure is identified, understanding the importance of the elopement binder and reviewing it at the beginning of each shift worked, and the proper procedures of resident LOA, signature for each oncoming and off-going shift on the clipboard indicating they had both appropriately initiated or deactivated the screamer alarm and for their review of the elopement binder, the process of utilizing the video doorbell for visitor/vendor entry and exit and notification of nursing manager if exit seeking behavior is identified.
- Newly hired staff and staff members on leave will receive education at orientation or prior to working their next scheduled shift.
- Root Cause Analysis (RCA) completed and reviewed by QAPI. Additional contributing root causes were identified and addressed in QAPI, as outlined below. These factors were staff response, staff knowledge of elopement risks and resident safety, appropriate plan of care/interventions for residents, muting of the C wing annunciator.
- The facility conducted an ad hoc QAPI meeting which included the Facility Administrator, DON, Medical Director via telephone, and additional staff members. The Performance Improvement Plan was accepted by the committee. The annunciator and the correction plan of the annunciator was reviewed in QAPI as indicated by the review of the maintenance enhancement plan. Door alarm annunciator volume increased on C wing, mute button on C wing annunciator disabled. Reviewed staff education completed including identification and response/process of exit seeking behaviors, elopement drills conducted. No additional recommendations were made at that time.
Failure to Disburse Resident Funds Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to disburse resident funds within 30 days to the representatives of three deceased residents, as required by their policy. Resident #1 had a Power of Attorney (POA) listed, and after the resident's death, the Business Office Manager (BOM) acknowledged delays in merging accounts due to a change in facility ownership. The BOM stated that the POA was in regular contact and had received a partial refund, but the full disbursement was delayed beyond the 30-day requirement. Resident #2's account remained open with a balance of $100.02 after the resident's death. The BOM admitted to not sending a letter to the resident's representative and acknowledged responsibility for not closing the account promptly. The resident's emergency contacts were documented, but no action was taken to disburse the funds within the required timeframe. For Resident #3, the account also remained open with a balance of $63.03 after the resident's death. The BOM did not send a letter to the resident's representative and planned to send the funds to unclaimed property due to the absence of a POA on file. The BOM was unaware of the cousin listed as an emergency contact having POA papers. The facility's administrator confirmed the 30-day requirement for refunding resident funds, which was not met in these cases.
Delayed Response to POA Grievance on Funds Reimbursement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly address a grievance related to a resident's Power of Attorney (POA) request for funds reimbursement. The Business Office Manager (BOM) acknowledged that the facility was undergoing a transition to new ownership, which involved merging resident funds accounts. Despite the POA's initial communication requesting assistance in closing the resident's trust account and receiving the remaining funds, there was no documented follow-up from the facility until the POA reached out again. This lack of timely communication and resolution of the grievance was identified as a deficiency. The resident in question had been admitted to the facility and subsequently passed away. The POA was aware of the ongoing merger of funds but did not receive a timely response regarding the reimbursement. The BOM eventually communicated that the account had been closed and a check would be issued, but this response came only after the POA's repeated inquiries. The delay in addressing the POA's grievance and the absence of written documentation of follow-up communication contributed to the facility's failure to honor the resident's right to voice grievances without reprisal.
Inadequate Infection Control During COVID-19 Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective infection control program during a COVID-19 outbreak, as evidenced by the lack of adherence to CDC and Florida Department of Health (DOH) recommendations. Observations revealed that three out of five Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) carts on the first and second floors did not contain N95 masks or eye protection, which are essential for healthcare personnel entering rooms of residents with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite recommendations from the DOH, the facility did not ensure that N95 masks were readily available in isolation carts, and staff were observed using KN95 masks instead. Interviews with staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Preventionist (IP), and central supply personnel, highlighted a lack of clear responsibility and accountability for stocking PPE carts. The DON stated that everyone was responsible for ensuring the carts were stocked, but observations showed inconsistencies in the availability of N95 masks and eye protection. Staff members, including CNAs and LPNs, were observed wearing KN95 masks when caring for COVID-19 positive residents, contrary to the facility's guidelines and DOH recommendations. Additionally, there was a lack of consistent signage indicating the appropriate use of PPE outside residents' rooms. The report also detailed specific instances where staff failed to follow proper infection control protocols. For example, a CNA was observed not changing gowns between resident care and leaving room doors open, which should have been closed according to the facility's guidelines. Another staff member, an Occupational Therapist Assistant, admitted to not wearing an N95 mask while providing therapy to a COVID-19 positive resident, acknowledging it was a mistake. These actions contributed to the facility's failure to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program during the outbreak.
Failure to Provide Dining Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance during dining for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #44, who was admitted with diagnoses of muscle wasting, anemia, and depression, required supervision with touch-up assistance for eating, as indicated by the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Observations on multiple occasions revealed that Resident #44's meals were left untouched, and staff did not encourage or assist the resident to eat. For instance, on 04/22/24, the resident's breakfast and lunch trays were left untouched, and no staff attempted to wake or assist the resident. Similar observations were made on 04/23/24 and 04/24/24, where the resident was found asleep with untouched meal trays and no staff intervention. Interviews with staff members provided conflicting information about the resident's ability to eat independently. Staff K and Staff L stated that Resident #44 could eat independently and usually consumed a significant portion of her meals, which contradicted the surveyor's observations. Additionally, the CNA task records inaccurately reported the resident's meal consumption. A review of the resident's weight log showed a downward trend in weight, indicating potential nutritional issues. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that Resident #44 required supervision with touch-up assistance, which was not consistently provided, leading to the deficiency in care.
Failure to Address Skin Rash and UTI Symptoms in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address a skin rash for Resident #97 and new symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) for Resident #59 in a timely manner. Resident #97, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on activities of daily living, was admitted with a tracheostomy and feeding tube. The resident was care planned for a rash on the upper back, with interventions including anti-pruritic medications and monitoring for infection. Despite an order for Permethrin lotion on 03/30/24, the medication was not administered until 04/05/24, and there was no documentation explaining the delay. Additionally, there was no documentation of the rash's condition since the initial order, and the Director of Nursing (DON) was unaware of the prescribed treatment. Interviews with staff and the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) revealed a lack of awareness and follow-up on the rash's condition and treatment efficacy. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Consultant Pharmacist provided conflicting information about the use of Permethrin, with the NP suggesting a dermatologist consult, which had not been ordered. Resident #59, admitted with cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes, reported burning with urination on 04/23/24. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for the resident did not document any follow-up or new orders until prompted by the surveyor the next day. The LPN claimed to have called the resident's primary doctor, but there was no record of this call. The physician confirmed that no call was received on the previous day. Eventually, an order for Pyridium was received, and a urine sample was collected for analysis. The resident reported feeling better the following day, but the delay in addressing the symptoms was evident. Interviews with the Regional Nurse Consultant and the Director of Nurses confirmed the timeline of events and the eventual actions taken to address the resident's symptoms.
Failure to Maintain Physician Oversight for Worsening Pressure Wounds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain physician oversight for worsening pressure wounds for Resident #64, who was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia. Upon admission, the resident was assessed with a Braden Scale score indicating a mild risk for pressure sores. However, over several months, the resident developed multiple pressure wounds on the sacrum and hips, which progressively worsened. Despite the deterioration, there was a lack of consistent documentation and oversight by the physician, with several visits recorded without any mention of the wounds. The wound documentation revealed a series of worsening measurements and conditions, including necrotic tissue and purulent drainage. The resident's wounds were not consistently assessed by a wound care specialist until several months after the initial identification of the pressure sores. The facility's policy required prompt assessment and treatment of pressure injuries, but this was not adhered to, as evidenced by the delayed involvement of a wound care nurse practitioner and the subsequent surgical debridement. Interviews with staff and the resident's family highlighted concerns about the resident's nutrition and the adequacy of protein in her meals, which could have contributed to the worsening of her wounds. The Director of Nurses admitted that there was a period when the wound care physician was not visiting the facility, and the nurse manager was responsible for weekly wound checks. This lack of specialized oversight and the failure to document and address the wounds in a timely manner led to the deficiency in care for Resident #64.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nutritional Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely identify residents with malnutrition status and provide nutritional interventions, resulting in weight loss and pressure ulcer development for Resident #64. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction and type 2 diabetes, experienced significant weight loss and the development of pressure ulcers due to inadequate nutritional support. Despite being on a carbohydrate diet with pureed texture and thin consistency, the resident's intake was poor, and the facility did not consistently provide the prescribed nutritional supplements or adjust the feeding regimen appropriately. Observations revealed that the resident's tube feeding was not managed correctly, with discrepancies in the type and amount of formula administered. The facility's dietitian failed to recommend or document additional nutritional supplements in a timely manner, despite the resident's declining weight and poor meal intake. The dietitian also did not adjust the tube feeding rate and hours when the formula was changed, leading to insufficient caloric and protein intake for the resident. Interviews with staff and the resident's family highlighted issues with meal tray contents and the provision of nutritional supplements. The family reported that meal trays often lacked protein and that they had to request supplements from the kitchen. The dietitian acknowledged the resident's severe weight loss and the need for increased nutritional support but did not implement necessary interventions promptly. The resident's care plan and physician's notes also failed to address the nutritional status and the development of pressure ulcers adequately.
Failure to Limit PRN Psychotropic Drug Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to limit a new order for a psychotropic drug used on a PRN basis for a resident reviewed for unnecessary medication. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Syncope, Diabetes Type 2, and Anxiety Disorder, had a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognitive intactness. On 04/04/24, the physician ordered Alprazolam 2 MG to be given as needed for sleep at bedtime. However, the consultant pharmacist recommended discontinuing or adding a stop date to the PRN Alprazolam or updating it to scheduled dosing, which the physician disagreed with on 04/12/24 without providing a rationale or indication for the duration of the PRN order in the medical record. The deficiency was identified during a review and discussion with the Regional Nurse Consultant, who acknowledged the recommendation and noted that the order had just been changed to Alprazolam 1 MG at bedtime for anxiety. The facility's policy on unnecessary drugs, revised on 08/02/22, requires that new orders for psychotropic medications used on a PRN basis follow specific requirements, which was not adhered to in this case.
Latest citations in Florida
Surveyors found that the facility’s only commercial cooking hood was not maintained in accordance with NFPA 101 and NFPA 96 requirements. During a kitchen tour with the Maintenance Director, the hood was observed to be not grease tight due to missing fire-resistant caulk, and the Maintenance Director acknowledged this condition at the time of the survey.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to comply with NFPA 99, NFPA 70, and NFPA 1 requirements for electrical equipment when, during a tour with the Maintenance Director, a power strip in the electrical room was observed being used as a permanent power source instead of a dedicated receptacle. The report states that this improper use of a relocatable power tap could lead to electrical hazards for residents and staff, and notes that extension cords and power strips are not to be used as substitutes for fixed wiring under the cited codes.
Surveyors found that the facility did not have documentation showing completion of the required annual 90‑minute test of emergency lighting. During record review and interview, the Director of Facilities confirmed that records of this annual test, required under NFPA 101 sections 19.2.9.1 and 7.9, were not available. This deficiency was cited as affecting all occupants in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to perform and/or document the required annual Duct Detector Differential testing for the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 101, NFPA 70, and NFPA 72. During record review and interviews with the Director of Facilities, no documentation could be produced to show that this annual testing had been completed, and the Director acknowledged the lack of records. This deficiency was cited as potentially affecting all occupants in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to perform and/or document required annual testing and exercising of main and feeder circuit breakers in accordance with NFPA 99 and manufacturer recommendations. During record review, no documentation could be produced to show that the annual breaker exercises had been completed, and the Director of Facilities acknowledged this lack of records. This deficiency relates to the essential electrical system that supports life safety and critical branches during emergencies.
Surveyors observed that an adapter was used to power a refrigerator in the kitchen and a refrigerator in the dining room manager's office was plugged into a power strip. The Director of Facilities confirmed both uses, which did not comply with NFPA 99 and NFPA 70 requirements prohibiting adapters and power strips from being used as substitutes for permanent wiring.
Surveyors found that food service operations failed to meet professional food safety standards in both the main and satellite kitchens. In the main kitchen, a cook’s facial hair was not fully covered, the handwashing sink did not initially provide warm water, wet-nested pans and dirty plate domes were stored for use, ice buckets were stained with mold-like discoloration, and the high-temp dishwasher failed to reach the required sanitizing temperature. In the satellite pantry, the dishwasher did not reach required wash temperatures, vents and cabinets above serving dishes had mold-like buildup and residue, floors were damaged and soiled, the dishwasher chemical cabinet was rusted, the AC filter was heavily soiled, the juice dispenser had debris near clean cups, and tray carts contained dirty sheet trays. During tray line observation, salad items were held above 41°F, and a pureed vegetable listed on the menu extension was not available on the line.
Two residents on physician-ordered modified diets (pureed and mechanical soft with nectar-thick liquids) were given Regular Menus listing items such as fresh fruit, salad greens, and grilled cheese that were not compatible with their diet orders. Both residents selected items from these Regular Menus, but the facility either could not provide the chosen foods due to diet restrictions or substituted different items (e.g., canned peach halves instead of fresh fruit), despite the residents’ expressed preferences. The RD and dietetic technician confirmed that Regular Menus were routinely provided to all residents, including those on mechanically altered diets, leading to menu choices that did not align with ordered diet consistencies.
Surveyors found that the facility did not follow physician-ordered therapeutic diets or provide prescribed Magic Cup nutritional supplements for several cognitively impaired residents. A resident on a pureed diet with honey-thick liquids was served a lunch without the ordered pureed vegetable, and tray line review on another day showed no pureed vegetables available despite the menu specifying them. Multiple residents with orders for Magic Cup supplements had these listed on their meal tickets but were instead served other desserts or received no supplement at all, while documentation on the MAR indicated full consumption. Dietary staff acknowledged responsibility for providing Magic Cups but could not explain why residents in the dining room did not receive them.
A resident with intact cognition and multiple cardiac and pulmonary diagnoses had clearly documented DNR orders, including signed advance directive forms and care plan entries confirming her wish to avoid resuscitation. During a cardiac emergency, a CNA found the resident unresponsive and notified an RN, who initiated a code blue response. Several RNs and LPNs transferred the resident to bed and began CPR without first verifying code status, despite one LPN asking and then leaving the room to check the record. Staff interviews and video review showed that chest compressions and use of a bag-valve mask continued for about 12 minutes until EMS arrived, even after staff learned the resident was DNR, and the physician confirmed the resident was already listed as DNR in the system, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy finding for failure to honor advance directives.
Commercial Cooking Hood Not Maintained Grease Tight per NFPA Standards
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency involving the facility’s commercial cooking facilities. During a tour of the kitchen between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. with the Maintenance Director, surveyors observed that the one commercial cooking hood in use was not grease tight. Specifically, the hood was missing required fire-resistant caulk, which is necessary for maintaining a grease-tight seal in accordance with NFPA 96 and NFPA 101 standards. The Maintenance Director acknowledged these findings at the time of observation. The deficiency was cited under NFPA 101 and NFPA 96 requirements for commercial cooking operations, which mandate that cooking equipment and associated hoods be protected and maintained in compliance with these fire and life safety codes.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth on the statement of deficiencies. This plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because required. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Commercial cooking hood system inspected; no additional deficient areas were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes will you make to ensure that the practice does not recur:Maintenance staff and Dietary staff education on proper use and reporting of issues related to cooking hood system.Verification of scheduled inspections and cleaning of cooking hood system by licensed vendor.How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place:The maintenance director/designee will complete weekly audits of cooking hood system for 4 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure compliance. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance. Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth on the statement of deficiencies. This plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because required. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Commercial cooking hood system inspected; no additional deficient areas were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes will you make to ensure that the practice does not recur; Maintenance staff and Dietary staff education on proper use and reporting of issues related to cooking hood system. Verification of scheduled inspections and cleaning of cooking hood system by licensed vendor. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place; The maintenance director/designee will complete weekly audits of cooking hood system for 4 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure compliance. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance.
Improper Use of Power Strip as Permanent Power Source in Electrical Room
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to improper use of relocatable power taps (RPTs) and power strips in violation of NFPA 99, NFPA 70, and NFPA 1 requirements. During a facility tour conducted between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. with the Maintenance Director, surveyors observed one power strip in the electrical room being used as a source of permanent power instead of being connected to a dedicated receptacle. The report notes that this use did not comply with standards that require extension cords and power strips not be used as a substitute for fixed wiring and that they be used only under specified conditions. The deficiency specifically concerns the facility’s failure to ensure that RPTs are maintained and used in accordance with NFPA 99 (2012 Edition) sections 10.2.3.6 and 10.2.4, and NFPA 70 (2011 and 2020 Editions) provisions governing flexible cords and temporary wiring, as well as NFPA 1 (2021 Edition) sections 11.1.2.2, 11.1.4.1, and 1.4.1. The report states that this condition could lead to electric hazards for residents and staff. No individual resident cases, medical histories, or specific clinical conditions are described in connection with this deficiency.
Plan Of Correction
What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Facility wide audit of electrical rooms was conducted to identify improper use of power strips. No additional concerns were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur; The facility completed education reinforcing compliance with electrical safety requirements in accordance with National Fire Protection Association. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place: The maintenance director/designee will complete random electrical safety audits 2 times per week for 4 weeks, then monthly to ensure compliance with electrical safety standards. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Facility wide audit of electrical rooms was conducted to identify improper use of power strips. No additional concerns were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur; The facility completed education reinforcing compliance with electrical safety requirements in accordance with National Fire Protection Association. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place; The maintenance director/designee will complete random electrical safety audits 2 times per week for 4 weeks, then monthly to ensure compliance with electrical safety standards. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance.
Failure to Document Required Annual 90‑Minute Emergency Lighting Test
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to emergency lighting when, during record review and staff interview between 11:30 AM and 3:00 PM with the Director of Facilities, the facility was unable to provide documentation that the required annual 90‑minute testing of emergency lighting had been performed. The Director of Facilities acknowledged that there was no documentation available to show completion of this annual 90‑minute emergency lighting test, as required by NFPA 101 (2012 and 2021 editions), sections 19.2.9.1 and 7.9. This failure to document the annual emergency lighting test was cited as a noncompliance that could affect all occupants of the facility in the event of a fire or other emergency. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were mentioned in the report; the deficiency pertains to facility-wide life safety systems and their required testing and documentation.
Plan Of Correction
Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Emergency Lighting K0291 The facility immediately conducted a comprehensive inspection of all emergency lighting systems. On The Director of Facilities performed the required 90-minute annual testing of all emergency lighting units. Documentation of testing has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All areas of the facility were considered at risk due to lack of documented annual testing. A full facility-wide audit of all emergency lighting units was completed on by the Director of Facilities to ensure compliance. 3. The facility implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure annual 90-minute emergency lighting testing is completed in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012), Section 7.9. A log tracking system has been developed to document all required testing. The Director of Facilities/designee will receive re-education on Life Safety Code requirements and documentation standards. 4. The Director of Facilities will review fire alarm testing records quarterly for 12 months, will present the findings for 12 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the twelve months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required. Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Emergency Lighting K0291 The facility immediately conducted a comprehensive inspection of all emergency lighting systems. On The Director of Facilities performed the required 90-minute annual testing of all emergency lighting units. Documentation of testing has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All areas of the facility were considered at risk due to lack of documented annual testing. A full facility-wide audit of all emergency lighting units was completed on by the Director of Facilities to ensure compliance. 3. The facility implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure annual 90-minute emergency lighting testing is completed in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012), Section 7.9. A log tracking system has been developed to document all required testing. The Director of Facilities/designee will receive re-education on Life Safety Code requirements and documentation standards. 4. The Director of Facilities will review fire alarm testing records quarterly for 12 months, will present the findings for 12 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the twelve months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required.
Failure to Perform and Document Annual Duct Detector Differential Testing
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the facility’s fire alarm system testing and maintenance, specifically the required annual Duct Detector Differential testing. During record review conducted between 11:30 AM and 3:00 PM, surveyors requested documentation demonstrating that this annual testing had been completed in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012 and 2021 editions), NFPA 70, and NFPA 72. The facility was unable to produce records showing that the Duct Detector Differential testing had been performed as required. In an interview conducted during the same time frame, the Director of Facilities acknowledged that the facility failed to provide documentation of the annual Duct Detector Differential testing. The deficiency was cited under NFPA 101 2012 (19.2.9.1, 7.9) and NFPA 101 2021 (19.2.9.1, 7.9), indicating noncompliance with the standards that require fire alarm detection systems, including duct detectors, to be tested and maintained annually. The report notes that this deficiency could affect all occupants of the facility in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Plan Of Correction
Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance K0345 1. On The facility a certified fire alarm vendor to perform annual duct detector differential testing. All required testing has now been completed and documented. 2. All residents and staff were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A facility-wide review of all fire alarm components was conducted on 3. The facility established a service agreement to ensure all fire alarm testing (including duct detectors) is completed annually per NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 requirements. A compliance calendar has been implemented with alerts for required inspections and testing. The Director of Facilities/designee has been re-educated on required testing intervals and documentation. 4. The Director of Facilities or designee will audit for 3 months all documentation for the annual testing and inspection of the duct detector pressure differential test. The Director of Facilities will present the findings of site inspections for 3 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance K0345 1. On The facility a certified fire alarm vendor to perform annual duct detector differential testing. All required testing has now been completed and documented. 2. All residents and staff were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A facility-wide review of all fire alarm components was conducted on. 3. The facility established a service agreement to ensure all fire alarm testing (including duct detectors) is completed annually per NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 requirements. A compliance calendar has been implemented with alerts for required inspections and testing. The Director of Facilities/designee has been re-educated on required testing intervals and documentation. 4. The Director of Facilities or designee will audit for 3 months all documentation for the annual testing and inspection of the duct detector pressure differential test. The Director of Facilities will present the findings of site inspections for 3 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required
Failure to Perform and Document Annual Main and Feeder Breaker Testing
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to perform and document required annual maintenance and testing of the main and feeder circuit breakers in accordance with NFPA 99 and manufacturer recommendations. During a record review conducted between 11:30 AM and 3:00 PM, surveyors requested documentation of the annual main and feeder breaker exercise. The facility was unable to provide records demonstrating that this testing and exercising had been completed as required. In interviews conducted during the same time frame, the Director of Facilities acknowledged that the facility did not have documentation showing that the annual main and feeder breaker exercise was performed according to manufacturer recommendations. The report notes that this failure to comply with NFPA 99 (2012 and 2021 editions, Sections 6.4.4 and 6.5.4) could affect all occupants of the facility in the event of a fire or other emergency, and that written records of maintenance and testing are required to be maintained and readily available.
Plan Of Correction
Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing K0918 1. On A licensed electrical contractor performed the annual main and feeder breaker testing/exercising in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. Documentation has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All residents were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A full review of the essential electrical system was conducted on 3. A preventative maintenance program has been implemented to ensure that annual breaker testing is completed per NFPA 99 (2012). The facility has incorporated electrical system testing into its environmental compliance tracking system. The Director of Facilities/designee received re-education on NFPA requirements. 4. The Director of Facilities will audit electrical system maintenance logs quarterly for 12 months. Inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required. Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing K0918 1. On A licensed electrical contractor performed the annual main and feeder breaker testing/exercising in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. Documentation has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All residents were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A full review of the essential electrical system was conducted on . 3. A preventative maintenance program has been implemented to ensure that annual breaker testing is completed per NFPA 99 (2012). The facility has incorporated electrical system testing into its environmental compliance tracking system. The Director of Facilities/designee received re-education on NFPA requirements. 4. The Director of Facilities will audit electrical system maintenance logs quarterly for 12 months. Inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, , and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required.
Improper Use of Adapters and Power Strips for Refrigerators
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves improper use of electrical adapters and power strips as substitutes for permanent wiring, in violation of NFPA 99 and NFPA 70 requirements. During an observation with the Director of Facilities, surveyors found that an adapter was being used to power a refrigerator in the kitchen. The Director of Facilities acknowledged that an adapter was in use for this refrigerator, contrary to the standards that prohibit adapters from being used in place of fixed wiring. In a separate observation with the Director of Facilities, surveyors identified that a refrigerator in the dining room manager's office was plugged into a power strip. The Director of Facilities acknowledged that a power strip was being used for this refrigerator. These findings showed that the facility was not complying with NFPA 99 provisions that require power strips and adapters not be used as substitutes for permanent wiring for such equipment.
Plan Of Correction
Formatted text (without <text> tags or quotes): Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension K0920 1. On The adapter in the kitchen refrigerator and the power strip in the dining room manager's office were immediately removed. All equipment was plugged directly into approved wall outlets. 2. On A facility-wide inspection was conducted by The Director of Facilities to identify improper use of power strips and adapters. Any non-compliant items were removed immediately. 3. On Staff were educated on proper electrical safety practices, including prohibited use of extension and adapters. Routine environmental rounds now include electrical safety checks. 4. The Director of Facilities/designee will conduct monthly environmental rounds for 3 months, then quarterly thereafter. Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that Continued from page occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required. Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension K0920 1. On The adapter in the kitchen refrigerator and the power strip in the dining room manager's office were immediately removed. All equipment was plugged directly into approved wall outlets. 2. On A facility-wide inspection was conducted by The Director of Facilities to identify improper use of power strips and adapters. Any non-compliant items were removed immediately. 3. On Staff were educated on proper electrical safety practices, including prohibited use of extension and adapters. Routine environmental rounds now include electrical safety checks. 4. The Director of Facilities/designee will conduct monthly environmental rounds for 3 months, then quarterly thereafter. Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Main and Satellite Kitchens
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple failures to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in both the main kitchen and a satellite pantry kitchen. In the main kitchen, a cook’s beard cover did not fully cover all facial hair, and the handwashing sink initially did not provide warm water until the Executive Director manually adjusted a valve under the sink. In the pot washing area, full-sized steam table pans were stacked while still wet, and more than five plate domes with stuck-on food particles were found piled in the tray line area ready for use, indicating they had not been properly washed. Two large ice buckets were stained with black and grey mold-like discoloration and white wear marks. The high-temperature dishwashing machine in the main kitchen was run three times but failed to reach the required 180°F rinse temperature, only reaching 172°F, meaning dishes were not properly sanitized. In the second-floor satellite pantry kitchen, the high-temperature dishwashing machine was also run three times and failed to meet required wash temperatures, reaching only 139°F instead of the required 150–165°F, so dishes were not properly cleaned and sanitized. Additional sanitation and maintenance issues were observed, including a vent above serving dishes with a mold-like accumulation, broken and soiled cabinets above serving dishes with residue on the handles, and pantry floors with cracked, broken, and missing tiles with debris or residue buildup. The dishwasher chemical cabinet lock was rust-laden, the AC filter was covered with dark grey soot and dust, the juice dispenser with clean cups nearby had debris on top, and tray delivery carts contained large sheet trays with residue and stuck-on food debris. During a tray line observation, chopped tomatoes and sliced avocados on the salad line were held at 44°F and 45°F respectively, above the required 41°F or less, and the menu extension listed pureed peas for a pureed diet, but no pureed vegetable was present on the line.
Plan Of Correction
Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary CFR(s): 483.60(i)(1)(2) §483.60(i) Food safety requirements. Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required F0812 1. All identified sanitation issues were corrected on Hot water valve was fixed immediately by maintenance team Steam table pan wet nesting was corrected The 5 plate domes that were dirty were taken to the dishwasher to be washed Stained ice buckets were replaced with new ones Dishwashing machine not reaching temperature for rinse cycle was fixed by Eco lab the same day Team member was provided education and in-service on proper use of beard guard. Corrected on [R] 2.Identified issues from satellite Kitchen were corrected on [R] Dishwashing machine not reaching temperature for rinse cycle was fixed by Eco lab the same day The vent located above the serving dishes was cleaned by maintenance team The cabinets were cleaned immediately The floors of the pantry area were observed with broken, cracked, missing tiles, with buildup residue and debris. Maintenance director made aware in the process of getting replaced. The locking mechanism of the dishwasher chemical cabinet is rust laden. Laden removed and in the process of being replaced. The AC filter was cleaned by maintenance team Th juice dispenser was cleaned by dietary aide The large delivery trays with residue and food debris were discarded 3. Issues identified during Tray line observation were corrected: The chopped tomatoes and sliced avocados were discarded Pureed vegetable was added to the line. Inservice on serving all food groups, starches, protein and vegetables to residents on texture modified diet order. Inservice provided to all dietary aides Inservice on maintaining and holding temperatures for ready to eat foods. Inservice provided to all cooks and dietary aides Daily sanitation rounds will be conducted by the Certified Dietary manager /designee for one week. Weekly for 2 months. 4. The Certified Dietary Manager/Executive Chef/designee will report the findings of the above observations and audits to the monthly QAPI Committee. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and compliance of this POC and and resolving any variances that may occur.
Failure to Honor Diet-Appropriate Menu Choices for Residents on Modified Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with menu choices that matched their physician-ordered diet textures and liquid consistencies. One resident with severe cognitive impairment had a physician order for a controlled diet with pureed texture and honey-thick liquids. During a noon meal observation, this resident’s meal ticket was stapled to a Regular Menu listing items such as lettuce and tomato salad, stir-fried vegetables, and a grilled cheese sandwich, none of which were appropriate for the resident’s ordered diet. The Registered Dietitian and the Dietetic Technician confirmed that Daily Menu printouts with Regular Menu options were provided to all residents, including those on mechanically altered diets, resulting in residents being offered choices that could not be honored due to diet restrictions. Another resident with moderate cognitive impairment had a physician order for a mechanical soft diet with nectar-thick liquids. This resident’s lunch tray ticket was also stapled to a Regular Menu that included salad greens, which are not allowed on a mechanical soft diet. On a separate breakfast observation, the same resident’s Regular Menu included fresh fruit as a choice, which the resident circled, but the tray contained canned peach halves instead. The resident stated she wanted her chosen fresh fruit rather than the peaches and reiterated her food preferences during the interview. Photographic evidence was obtained to document these discrepancies between ordered diets, menu offerings, and the food actually provided.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is requiredF05501. Resident #54 and Resident #56 were immediately assessed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) & CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) for food preferences on Residents #54 and #56 were offered meal choices consistent with the prescribed diet. No adverse outcomes were identified. 2. 100% audit of all residents with therapeutic diets was completed on [R] by CDM to ensure menus and meal selections consistent with physician-ordered diets.On [R] , CDM provided in-service provided to dietary aides, certified nursing assistants, nurses, managers on new selective menu processes. 3. The facility implemented a diet-specific menu system and pre-meal diet verification process by reviewing the diet in tray ticket program IMPAC and PCC. Copies of the menus to be provided as part of the audits.Diet Menu was revised to include a mechanically altered diet to be consistent with physician orders. Therapeutic diets menus are available and offered to each resident according to physician orders. The Dietary Manager or designee will conduct weekly audits of 4 residents on therapeutic diets x 4 weeks then monthly x 2months, to verify the correct menu is offered and served. 4. The Dietary Manager or designee will report findings at the monthly QAPI meeting. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and compliance with this POC and [R] , and resolving any variances that occur.
Failure to Follow Therapeutic Diet Orders and Provide Prescribed Nutritional Supplements
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow physician-ordered therapeutic diets and prescribed nutritional supplements for multiple residents. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a physician’s order for a controlled diet with pureed texture and honey-thick liquids was observed at lunch without the ordered pureed vegetable; her plate contained only pureed chicken, a pureed starch, and possibly a pureed bread, all covered in gravy. The pureed menu for that meal listed broccoli as the vegetable, and a subsequent tray line observation on another day showed no pureed vegetables available, despite the pureed menu specifying pureed peas. The dietary manager and registered dietitian were informed of the missing pureed vegetables, and photographic evidence was obtained. The facility also failed to provide ordered Magic Cup nutritional supplements as prescribed. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a care plan addressing risk for compromised nutritional status had a physician’s order for a 4 oz Magic Cup on day and evening shifts with lunch and dinner; during a breakfast observation, the meal ticket listed Magic Cup, but none was provided. Another resident with moderate cognitive impairment had a physician’s order for a 4 oz Magic Cup with lunch; during lunch observation, the meal ticket indicated Magic Cup, but the resident was served chocolate ice cream and ate coconut cream pie for dessert instead. The MAR documented 100% consumption of a Magic Cup on two consecutive days, despite the observed failure to provide it. During interviews, the RD and dietary manager explained that Magic Cups were to be provided by dietary staff either on trays or via the dessert/ice cream cart, but they could not explain why residents in the dining room did not receive the ordered supplements. Photographic evidence was obtained of these occurrences.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required F0803 1. Upon identification, resident #54 was given pureed vegetables. Residents #23, #39, and #54 were given Magic Cup supplements as ordered. On [R] CDM re-educated team members on supplement delivery including proper documentation and confirming that pureed diet being served matches what is listed on spread sheet. Dietary aides' morning and evening shifts are accountable for serving all food groups including vegetables when serving puree meals to residents. 2. A 100% audit of all residents with therapeutic diets and/or supplements was completed on [R] by Certified Dietary Manager. 3. A tray line checklist and diet/supplement reconciliation process between dietary and nursing were implemented by [R]. RD oversight of menu compliance was initiated. The Certified Dietary Manager or designee will audit food tray weekly x 4 weeks then weekly x 2 months. 4. The Certified Dietary Manager/Designee will report on the findings at the monthly QAPI meeting. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and compliance with this POC and [R], and resolving any variances that may occur.
Failure to Verify and Honor DNR Order Before Initiating CPR
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to honor a resident’s clearly established Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status during a cardiac emergency. The resident had multiple medical diagnoses, including cerebral infarction, COPD, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, a nonrheumatic mitral valve disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and immunodeficiency. The medical record contained DNR orders created on two separate dates with no end dates, a DNR document signed by the resident and a nurse practitioner, and a 3008 form listing the resident’s advance directive as DNR. The resident’s MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition, and progress notes documented that the difference between DNR/no CPR and full code had been explained over 30 minutes, after which the resident chose DNR and reiterated to social services that she did not want to be resuscitated or undergo chest compressions. On the day of the incident, a CNA assigned to the resident checked on her and found her sitting in a wheelchair and unresponsive despite multiple verbal attempts to rouse her. The CNA notified the RN, who obtained a blood pressure machine, entered the room, then ran out to the nurses’ station, after which a code blue was paged over the intercom. The RN returned with a crash cart, and additional nursing staff, including RNs and LPNs, entered the room. Staff described transferring the unresponsive resident from the wheelchair to the bed and beginning chest compressions. Multiple staff members reported that when one LPN asked about the resident’s code status, no one in the room knew it at that time, and that this LPN left the room to verify the code status while CPR was already in progress. Interviews and video review confirmed that CPR was initiated and continued for approximately 12 minutes before EMS arrived, despite the resident’s existing DNR orders. Several nurses, including those who arrived after CPR had started, acknowledged that they did not check the resident’s code status before assisting with chest compressions or using a bag-valve mask. Staff later reported that the LPN who checked the record returned and announced that the resident was a DNR, yet compressions continued until EMS arrived. The physician stated that the resident was already in the system as a DNR and that staff were expected to check code status before performing CPR. The DON and regional nurse consultant confirmed, based on interviews and camera review, that staff failed to confirm the resident’s code status prior to initiating CPR and that CPR was performed against the resident’s wishes, leading surveyors to determine that this failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.
Removal Plan
- Implemented a revised admission/readmission process requiring an Advance Directive discussion form to be completed by the licensed nurse upon admission or with change in advance directives, with follow-up by Social Services.
- Reviewed Advance Directive discussion forms in the daily clinical meeting with the Interdisciplinary Team.
- Conducted a huddle on units after the clinical meeting to discuss any changes in advance directives/code status.
- Placed signage on each crash cart stating: "Stop check physician order prior to starting Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation."
- Implemented the "It Takes Two" process requiring two licensed nurses to verify code status/advance directives prior to initiation of CPR.
- Initiated an internal investigation including resident record review, staff interviews, and notification to the physician and resident representative.
- Suspended and terminated the assigned nurse and reported the nurse’s license to the licensing board.
- Suspended and terminated an additional nurse who responded and participated in initiation of CPR and reported the nurse’s license to the licensing board.
- Suspended two additional nurses pending investigation and returned them to work with disciplinary action, education on ANE/honoring advance directives, and participation in a code blue drill.
- Conducted a 100% audit of all current residents’ code status and care plans.
- Conducted a 100% audit of crash carts to ensure all required items were present.
- Reviewed CPR cards for identified nurses to confirm validity and inclusion of in-person skills competencies.
- Held an ad hoc QAPI meeting with Administrator, DON, Medical Director, and department heads.
- Completed an audit of residents discharged, transferred to the hospital, or expired to verify advance directives were honored.
- Provided staff education for licensed/certified staff on medical emergency response and communication of advance directives and code status, following physician orders related to advance directives, the "It Takes Two" verification process, and CNA roles during code blue.
- Provided all-staff education on Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation/Resident Rights with focus on honoring advance directives.
- Completed honoring advance directives attestation with licensed nursing staff.
- Completed physician orders education for licensed nursing staff.
- Completed medical emergency response and communication of code status education for licensed nursing staff.
- Completed ANE/Resident Rights education for all staff.
- Completed advance directives posttest for licensed staff.
- Completed ANE/Resident Rights posttest for all staff.
- Completed code blue process/"It Takes Two" education for licensed nursing staff.
- Began code blue drills every shift and required licensed nurses to attend a mock code blue quality assurance drill prior to working.
- Completed CNA roles-in-code-blue training.
- Completed quality reviews validating staff competencies for completed education.
- Completed quality reviews of newly admitted residents to verify completion of the advance directive discussion form.
- Implemented Director of Clinical Services chart review of residents who expire at the facility or are transferred to the hospital after a cardiac event to verify advance directives were followed.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
