Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Nspire Healthcare Plantation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain food safety standards, with damaged utensils and unsanitary conditions noted in the kitchen. Additionally, staff did not adhere to proper hand hygiene practices, failing to wash hands before donning gloves after potential contamination. These deficiencies were observed during a kitchen tour, highlighting a lack of adherence to professional standards.
A resident with multiple health issues, including a pressure ulcer and surgical wound, did not receive timely wound care as per physician's orders. The resident's dressing was not changed for three days, despite the care plan requiring daily treatment. The Wound Care Nurse admitted to not performing the treatment and expected floor nurses to do so, leading to a lapse in care.
A resident with a history of serious medical conditions was given the wrong type of Aspirin by an RN, who administered a chewable tablet instead of the prescribed delayed-release form. The error was confirmed by the facility's pharmacist and DON, who noted the importance of administering the correct medication as per the physician's order.
The facility failed to maintain accurate records for two residents, leading to deficiencies in wound care and end-of-life documentation. One resident did not receive a documented dressing change as ordered, and the Wound Care Nurse signed off on the treatment without performing it. Another resident's passing was inadequately documented, with only the time of death recorded and no further notes, despite family presence.
The facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during medication administration for a resident with a PEG tube, as an LPN did not wear the required PPE. PPE gowns were unavailable for residents on EBP, and appropriate signage was missing. Additionally, hand hygiene was not properly performed during a blood glucose check, and a CNA's unsecured hair posed a cross-contamination risk during perineal care for a resident with a UTI.
Three residents in an LTC facility reported significant delays in call light responses, particularly during night shifts and weekends. Despite being cognitively intact, they experienced waits of 30 to 60 minutes or more, with staff often passing by without checking in. This issue was reported to nurses and discussed in resident council meetings, indicating a chronic problem with call light response times.
Food Safety and Hand Hygiene Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner, as observed during a kitchen tour. Several issues were noted, including damaged kitchen utensils that were no longer easily cleanable, an accumulation of food residues on a manual can opener, dust on an air conditioning vent over the food assembly area, and damage to the wall and missing tiles around the walk-in cooler door. These conditions indicate a lack of adherence to professional standards for food safety. Additionally, the facility's hand hygiene policy did not specifically address kitchen and food safety concerns, leading to multiple instances of staff failing to perform proper hand hygiene. Several dietary aides and a cook were observed not washing their hands before donning gloves after potential contamination, such as handling a wet floor sign, cleaning a cart with bare hands, and returning from breaks or other areas. These actions were acknowledged by the staff involved, and the surveyor intervened to stop them from continuing work until proper hand hygiene was performed.
Failure to Provide Timely Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to the physician's orders for wound treatment and did not provide timely wound care for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including acute osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dependence on renal dialysis. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a pressure ulcer and a surgical wound on the left foot. The care plan required daily wound treatment and monitoring, but the facility did not follow these orders. The resident expressed concern about the lack of dressing changes, and an observation confirmed that the dressing had not been changed since three days prior. The Treatment Administration Record indicated that the wound treatment was signed off for two days, but there was no record for the following day. The Wound Care Nurse admitted to not seeing or changing the resident's dressing on the day in question and acknowledged that the dressing had not been changed as required. The nurse also noted that floor nurses were expected to perform the treatment if she did not. This lapse in care was confirmed by photographic evidence and the nurse's acknowledgment of the oversight.
Incorrect Aspirin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer the correct type of Aspirin medication to a resident, as per the physician's order. During a Medication Administration Observation, a Registered Nurse (RN) was observed administering a chewable pink-colored Aspirin 81mg tablet instead of the prescribed yellow-colored Aspirin 81mg Delayed Release/Enteric coated tablet. The RN did not separate the chewable Aspirin into a different cup or inform the resident that it should have been chewed. This error was noted during a review of the facility's medication administration procedures, which emphasize the importance of checking the medication against the order before administration. The resident involved had a history of multiple medical conditions, including Cerebral Infarction, Endocarditis, and Coronary Artery Disease, and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview Mental Status score of 15. Interviews with the resident, the RN, the facility pharmacist, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the error. The pharmacist highlighted the difference in absorption methods between the two types of Aspirin, emphasizing that the correct medication should have been administered as ordered.
Deficiencies in Wound Care and End-of-Life Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two residents, leading to deficiencies in wound care documentation and end-of-life documentation. For one resident, who was admitted with conditions including acute osteomyelitis and diabetes, there was a failure to document wound care accurately. The resident expressed concern about the lack of recent dressing changes, and an observation confirmed that the dressing had not been changed as per the physician's orders. The Wound Care Nurse admitted to not performing the dressing change on a specific date but had signed the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) as if the treatment had been completed. In another case, the facility did not adequately document the passing of a resident who had multiple medical conditions, including heart failure and dementia. The nursing progress notes only recorded the time of death, with no further documentation on the day of or the day following the resident's passing. Interviews with the Social Services Director and the Director of Nursing revealed a lack of awareness and documentation regarding the resident's death, despite the presence of the resident's family at the time.
Infection Control and PPE Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during medication administration for a resident with a PEG tube, as observed when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered the resident's room without donning the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The LPN administered medication without wearing a PPE gown, despite the resident being under EBP due to the presence of a PEG tube. The corporate nurse later acknowledged that PPE should be worn during such procedures. Additionally, the facility did not ensure the availability of PPE gowns on the 2nd floor for residents under EBP. Observations revealed that PPE containers were not stocked with gowns, and staff were seen providing care without donning PPE. The Director of Maintenance admitted to not placing the order for gowns in time, and the Infection Preventionist acknowledged the oversight in restocking the containers. The facility also failed to post appropriate EBP signage for a resident with a PEG tube, which was necessary to inform staff of the required precautions. Furthermore, during a blood glucose check for another resident, an LPN did not perform hand hygiene and improperly disposed of a used lancet. In a separate incident, during perineal care for a resident with a UTI, a CNA's unsecured hair came into contact with the resident's skin, posing a risk of cross-contamination.
Delayed Call Light Response in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely response to call lights for three residents, leading to unmet needs and preferences. Resident #38, who is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, reported multiple complaints about delayed call light responses, particularly on weekends. During interviews, Resident #38 stated that staff often passed by without checking in, and it sometimes took 45 minutes to an hour for the call light to be answered. This issue was reported to the nurses and discussed during resident council meetings. The call light was checked and found to be functioning properly. Resident #13, also with a BIMS score of 15, expressed similar concerns about delayed call light responses, especially during the night shift from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM, with waits of 30 to 60 minutes. Resident #55, with a BIMS score indicating intact cognition, reported that call lights were typically answered about an hour later, particularly at night. Resident #55 used the call light primarily for assistance with changing. These delays in response times were consistent across the residents' reports, indicating a chronic issue with call light response in the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 351 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Plantation
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nspire Healthcare Lauderhill | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Broward Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Life Care Center At Inverrary | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Palms Care Center And Rehab | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Springtree Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Nspire Healthcare Plantation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.