Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of Melbourne during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident admitted with a complicated UTI, an indwelling Foley catheter, moderate cognitive impairment, and dependence in ADLs did not have any physician orders or care plan entries for catheter care or monitoring, despite documentation in an admission note and on the MDS that a catheter was present. The admitting RN incorrectly recorded that no catheter was present on the admission assessment, resulting in no catheter care orders populating the TAR. Throughout the stay, staff, including the unit manager and DON, later acknowledged the catheter was in place but could not locate any catheter care or monitoring orders in the record, even though facility policy required catheter care every shift and as needed.
The facility failed to maintain a complete antibiotic stewardship program for multiple residents receiving IV or oral antibiotics. A resident with a chronic wound and positive MRSA/Pseudomonas culture, another resident with a large draining gluteal wound, and a third resident receiving amoxicillin all had missed or undocumented antibiotic doses, and the IP and DON acknowledged missed medications were not being tracked, reviewed, or communicated to the physician as expected. The facility also stored clean linen carts and gowns in the dirty laundry room, with staff stating this was done because of limited storage and the IP unaware of the practice.
Meals were not kept at an appetizing temperature, with two residents reporting that food was cold every day and that complaints had not changed the issue. During meal delivery, one insulated cart and one non-insulated cart were used for the unit, and a sampled lunch tray was found to be lukewarm. The CDM acknowledged awareness of the complaints and stated the kitchen needed more insulated carts to preserve warm food temperatures.
Administration failed to provide enough resources and equipment to keep meals at palatable temperatures. The CDM said the kitchen used heat lamps, but plates lacked metal inserts and only one of nine requested insulated carts was received, so non-insulated carts were used for tray delivery. Staff reported ongoing complaints about cold food, limited help on the unit during lunch, and a routine where one CNA had to deliver trays and assist residents while another was sent elsewhere.
QAA/QAPI committee performance improvement activities were not sustained, with repeat deficiencies involving assessment accuracy, quality of care, and infection control. The NHA said the current PIP addressed hand hygiene, glucometer disinfection, BP monitoring/parameters/orders, POC documentation, oxygen discontinuation, and order accuracy, but the committee was not aware of the survey issues as a current concern. The facility policy stated performance indicators were to be systematically monitored as part of the QAPI program.
MDS assessments for a resident with mood disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and intellectual disabilities did not match the PASRR Level II determination. Both annual MDSs incorrectly marked A1500 as “No” even though the PASRR report identified the resident as meeting the state definition of SMI and ID and indicated A1500 should have been “Yes,” which would have triggered related SMI/ID items.
The facility failed to notify the State mental and ID authority after a resident with PASARR Level II status had a significant change in mental condition. The resident had SMI and ID, with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and intellectual disabilities. Records showed hallucinations, agitation, disorganized thinking, confusion, paranoia, threats, and a psychiatric hospital evaluation with medication changes, but staff confirmed no new PASARR was completed and the state authority was not informed.
Failure to Update Smoking Care Plan: A cognitively intact resident with COPD, nicotine dependence, and supplemental O2 dependence was identified as a supervised smoker, but staff documented repeated noncompliance with smoking rules, including smoking inside the facility and later smoking in the parking lot with O2 attached to the wheelchair. The care plan noted smoking supervision but did not address the resident's rule violations, smoking in her room, or smoking near oxygen, and the MDS coordinator, DON, and NHA acknowledged the plan had not been updated to reflect these behaviors.
Missed Medication Doses and Inconsistent MAR Documentation Two cognitively intact residents missed ordered doses of scheduled medications, including Gabapentin for pain and Xanax for anxiety. Staff gave conflicting accounts about whether the medications were available, whether Pyxis was checked, and whether the pharmacy had delivered the drugs, while MAR entries showed missed or incorrectly documented doses. Nursing notes reflected that one medication was on order and that a script was sent, but the records did not consistently support uninterrupted administration as ordered.
A resident receiving IV antibiotics through a PICC had delayed orders for dressing changes and IV flushes, and the PICC dressing was found soiled and non-intact after not being changed for more than a week. Staff confirmed the IV line care orders were not obtained until weeks after the resident returned from the hospital, and the DON acknowledged there had been no prior orders or documentation for PICC dressing changes or flushes.
The facility failed to identify and provide ongoing monitoring for trauma history in two residents with PTSD. One resident had dementia, depression, anxiety, substance abuse history, and PTSD, but the care plan and Social Services record did not include PTSD-specific assessment or trigger-focused interventions, and staff said they were unaware of any trauma-related needs. Another resident with schizoaffective disorder, major depression, and PTSD had a care plan that mentioned PTSD only in general terms, while a psychiatric NP documented significant trauma with nightmares, flashbacks, and hypervigilance and noted trauma triggers should be addressed; staff and the MDS coordinator could not find any trauma-specific care planning.
The facility did not follow its grievance process for two residents who reported concerns about care, including delays in assistance and denial of a requested shower. In both cases, grievances were either not logged or not fully documented, lacked required signatures and follow-up, and were not resolved according to policy. Facility staff acknowledged incomplete investigation and failure to keep residents informed, resulting in noncompliance with grievance procedures.
Staff failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a suprapubic catheter and MDRO history during high-contact care activities, such as bathing, dressing, and transferring. Despite posted signage and facility policy requiring both gloves and gowns, staff only wore masks and gloves, and were unaware of the need for gowns. The RN and Infection Preventionist also demonstrated gaps in knowledge and monitoring of EBP adherence, and PPE supplies were not available at the point of care.
Failure to Implement Orders and Monitoring for Indwelling Urinary Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure proper orders, care planning, and monitoring for an indwelling urinary catheter for one resident. The resident, an [AGE]-year-old female admitted from an acute care hospital with anemia, elevated white blood cell count, and a complicated UTI, had a documented Foley catheter on admission and throughout her stay. The Five-day MDS showed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, moderate cognitive impairment, dependence in ADLs, and was receiving high-risk medications including IV antibiotics for UTI. However, the physician Order Summary Report contained no orders or directions for monitoring or caring for the Foley catheter, and the Care Plan Report did not address the presence, care, or monitoring of the catheter, the UTI, or IV antibiotics. The nurse who completed the admission assessment documented the catheter in the admission note but incorrectly marked the admission data collection tool as negative for an indwelling catheter, and no catheter care orders were entered to generate tasks on the TAR. Review of the TAR for the month showed no orders or directions for catheter care or monitoring. Multiple staff, including the admitting RN, the Subacute Unit Manager, and the DON, later confirmed that the resident had a catheter during the stay and acknowledged that catheter orders were missed and not entered into the record. The facility’s written catheter care policy required that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care every shift and as needed, but this was not implemented for this resident due to the lack of documented orders and monitoring directives.
Incomplete Antibiotic Stewardship and Improper Laundry Separation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a complete antibiotic stewardship program for 3 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #117 was admitted with chronic pressure ulcer of the right ankle with necrosis of muscle, osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes, and had an Infectious Disease consult noting IV Cefepime and Daptomycin after a wound culture was positive for MRSA and Pseudomonas. The EMAR showed Cefepime was not documented as given on 10/28/25, was marked "not on hand" on 10/29/25, marked "on order" on 11/3/25, and again marked "not on hand" on 11/5/25 with a note that pharmacy would send it in the next batch delivery. Resident #81 was admitted with pneumonia, hemiplegia affecting the left non-dominant side, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis, atrial fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome, and a cardiac pacemaker. An Infectious Disease consult documented a large wound to the left gluteus with heavy drainage and concern for an underlying abscess, with orders for IV Cefepime and Vancomycin after a wound culture was obtained. The EMAR for Vancomycin showed a blank entry on 11/09/25 at 6:00 AM with no documentation that the medication was administered. Resident #21 was admitted with lack of coordination, immunodeficiency, type 2 diabetes, CKD stage 3B, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and the EMAR for Amoxicillin showed multiple doses coded as out of facility or unavailable across several entries. On interview, the Infection Preventionist stated she was responsible for tracking and monitoring antibiotic use throughout the building, but she did not realize the residents had missed doses or failed to receive a full course of antibiotics, and she said the DON had not informed her of the missed medications. The DON stated missed medications were not reviewed during daily morning meetings and acknowledged there was no documentation that the physician was notified when the antibiotics were unavailable. The facility's infection control policy stated antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use would be implemented as part of the antibiotic stewardship program, with the IP and DON serving as leaders of the program. The facility also failed to ensure linens and laundry were handled and stored safely: during a laundry room tour, clean linen carts and gowns were observed stored in the dirty laundry room, the room had no space for sorting dirty laundry, laundry aprons were in disrepair, and staff stated clean linens were kept there because of lack of storage. The IP said she was not aware clean linens were stored in the dirty laundry area and did not do frequent observations of the laundry room to ensure infection control practices were being followed.
Meals Served at Lukewarm Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received meals at an appetizing temperature. Resident #9 stated on 11/18/25 that his food was always cold, that he had complained multiple times in the past, and that nothing changed, adding, “I just eat it.” Resident #160 stated on 11/17/25 that her food was cold every day, that she had complained about it, and that the Kitchen Manager knew, adding, “this place doesn't want to get the warm plates; I eat what I can.” During observation on 11/20/25, one of two insulated carts for the 500-unit resident lunch meal was delivered at 11:42 AM and the second cart, which was not insulated, was delivered at 11:44 AM. The last lunch tray was delivered at 12:10 PM, and a sample tray containing fried chicken, rice, pinto beans, and corn bread was tested at 12:11 PM and found to be lukewarm and not at a palatable temperature, consistent with the resident complaints. The Certified Dietary Manager stated she was aware of complaints about cold food and that the kitchen needed more insulated carts to preserve warm food temperatures, but only one had been received and non-insulated carts were required to accommodate all unit meal trays.
Failure to Provide Equipment and Staffing Support for Hot Meal Delivery
Penalty
Summary
Administration failed to provide sufficient resources and equipment to ensure meals were delivered at palatable temperatures. The Certified Dietary Manager stated the kitchen used heat lamps on the steam table to help retain warm food temperatures, but the plates did not have metal inserts for heat retention. She also said she was aware of ongoing resident complaints about cold food and had requested nine insulated carts for all three units, but only one new insulated cart was received, requiring non-insulated carts that did not retain heat to be used for tray delivery. During lunch service on the 500 unit, one insulated cart was delivered first and a second, non-insulated cart followed shortly after. A CNA was observed distributing meal trays to resident rooms, and another CNA stated there was normally not enough help on the unit to deliver trays and assist residents because staff were assigned elsewhere. The CNA said the normal practice at lunchtime on the unit was for one CNA to be responsible for delivering trays and assisting residents to eat. The Activities Assistant, Activities Director, and NHA all described ongoing complaints and grievances about cold food, monthly complaints at Resident Council meetings, and the need for nine insulated carts, while the facility assessment stated each department head was responsible for determining needed equipment and obtaining it through purchase order or capital expenditure procedures.
QAA/QAPI Committee Did Not Sustain Prior Improvement Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure its QAA/QAPI committee conducted performance improvement activities to sustain prior improvement measures. Survey history showed repeat deficiencies involving accuracy of assessments, quality of care, and infection control during the current survey ending on 11/02/23, with similar systemic concerns identified on the previous recertification survey dated 11/2/23. During an interview on 11/20/25 at 6:15 PM, the NHA stated the repeat deficiencies related to infection control and quality of care were different from the issues from the previous survey, and explained that the current PIP, started in February 2025 and still ongoing, included hand hygiene, glucometer disinfection, blood pressure monitoring/parameters/orders, point of care documentation, oxygen discontinuation, and order accuracy. The NHA also stated the committee met monthly and created PIPs from grievances, mock survey results, and issues identified by department heads during round table discussions, and was not aware of the issues found during this survey as a current issue. The facility policy on QAPI Monitoring revised 8/1/24 stated it was the policy of the facility to systematically monitor performance indicators as part of the QAPI program.
MDS assessments did not reflect PASRR status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) results for one resident reviewed, resident #94. The resident’s medical record showed diagnoses including mood disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and intellectual disabilities. His MDS annual assessments with assessment reference dates of 10/05/24 and 10/06/25 both answered “No” to Section A1500, which asks whether the resident is currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The resident’s record also contained a Florida PASRR Level II Determination Summary Report dated 4/19/23, which stated that he met the state definition of SMI and ID and was appropriate for a nursing facility. The report further noted that socialized services were not deemed necessary, but rehabilitative services of a lesser intensity were recommended for inclusion in the comprehensive person-centered nursing care plan. During interview on 11/20/2025, the MDS Lead stated she was responsible for creating, updating, and timely submitting resident assessments and validated that both annual MDS assessments were answered incorrectly and that A1500 should have been answered “Yes,” which would have prompted responses to A1510 and A1550 related to SMI and ID conditions.
Failure to Notify State Authority After Significant Mental Status Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the State mental and intellectual disability authority after a significant change in the mental condition of a resident who had been identified on PASARR as meeting the state definition of Serious Mental Illness and Intellectual Disabilities. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including mood disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and intellectual disabilities. The PASARR Level II Determination Summary Report stated that if there was a significant change in mental status, an additional Level II review was recommended. The resident later had documented behavioral and mental status changes, including hallucinations, agitation, disorganized thinking, increased confusion or disorientation, delusions, and paranoia. A SBAR form noted a new Haldol injection order for hallucinations/agitation, and another SBAR and involuntary examination certificate described the resident as increasingly psychotic and paranoid, delusional, hallucinating, banging on other residents’ doors, and making threats. The resident was evaluated by psychiatry and transferred to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation, then returned with medication changes. Staff stated the PASARR was reviewed in clinical meetings, but the DON confirmed that a new PASARR was not completed and the state mental authority was not informed of the change in mental status.
Failure to Update Smoking Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident who was readmitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, nicotine dependence, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and chronic pain syndrome. The resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. The smoking assessment identified the resident as a safe smoker and stated that smoking was always supervised, with the smoking attendant holding the cigarettes and lighter. Social services documented that a strong cigarette odor had been coming from the resident's bathroom, that she had previously been caught smoking inside the facility, and that her smoking privileges were revoked after review of the smoking policy and discussion with the resident, who verbalized understanding and said she would not smoke within the facility. Despite these events, the resident was later observed smoking in the facility parking lot while her oxygen concentrator was attached to her wheelchair. Staff reported that she did not follow the smoking rules, and the administrator and DON stated that she had the right to leave the premises and that residents on leave of absence had no restrictions. The resident's care plan, initiated earlier, identified her as a smoker requiring supervision while smoking, but it did not address her noncompliance with smoking rules, smoking in her room, smoking with oxygen nearby, or smoking in the parking lot while her oxygen tank was on her wheelchair. The MDS coordinator stated she was not aware of the parking lot smoking or that smoking privileges had been revoked for smoking in the room, and the DON and NHA acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated.
Missed Medication Doses and Inconsistent Administration Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide medications and treatment according to physician orders for two residents. One resident was admitted with acute transverse myelitis, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depression, had intact cognition, and was ordered Gabapentin 100 mg three times daily for pain related to myelitis. The resident reported concern about missing doses after the medication was started, stating he received the first doses but then was told the medication had run out. The medication administration record showed inconsistent documentation, including a dose marked as refused, and the resident stated he did not receive a scheduled morning dose. Nursing staff gave conflicting accounts about whether the medication was available, whether it had been administered, and whether it had been obtained from the Pyxis system. Interviews with multiple nurses showed that staff did not consistently verify medication availability or ensure uninterrupted administration. One RN stated the resident had run out of Gabapentin and that she did not check the Pyxis, did not notify a supervisor, and did not know the medication was stored there. Another RN stated he would check the Pyxis, notify the doctor if needed, and document if a medication ran out, while an LPN stated he had enough medication during his shift and that he would also check the Pyxis if a medication was missing. The pharmacy provider stated the first delivery of Gabapentin for the resident was not until later, and review of pharmacy invoices and Pyxis dispensing records showed no earlier delivery or dispensing for that resident before the documented date. A second resident, who was cognitively intact and prescribed Xanax 0.5 mg twice daily for anxiety and Gabapentin 600 mg three times daily for neuropathy, also missed multiple doses. The resident stated the facility ran out of Xanax and Gabapentin and that missed Xanax doses made her more anxious than usual. The MAR showed several missed Xanax doses and missed Gabapentin doses, and nursing notes documented that Xanax was on order and that a script was needed and sent to the pharmacy. The unit manager later confirmed the missed doses and stated she could not produce associated progress notes for all of them, while the DON stated his expectation was that nurses would obtain the medication from Pyxis, call the pharmacy, call the doctor, and document.
Delayed PICC Care Orders and Missed Dressing Maintenance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident receiving IV antibiotics through a PICC line. The resident had been admitted and later readmitted from an acute care hospital with diagnoses including a displaced right femur fracture, sepsis, MRSA, and urinary retention. He had intact cognition on the admission MDS, and his physician orders included IV Vancomycin and Cefepime for a right hip surgical infection, with the PICC inserted on 10/25/25 to deliver the antibiotics. The resident’s record showed that orders for PICC dressing changes and IV flushes were not obtained until 11/17/25, 21 days after he returned from the hospital. The orders entered on that date directed weekly PICC dressing changes with Tegaderm every Monday day shift and flushing the IV line with 10 ml normal saline before and after each medication administration every shift. The care plan did not include an IV therapy focus until 11/17/25, more than 3 weeks after IV antibiotics had begun. On 11/17/25, the resident’s PICC dressing was observed to be non-intact, soiled, and dated 11/09/25, and the resident stated it had not been changed in more than a week. Staff confirmed the dressing was dirty and not intact, and the DON acknowledged the dressing required changes every 72 hours when gauze was used. The DON also confirmed there had been no prior orders for IV line care and no documentation of IV dressing changes or flushes. The facility’s IV therapy and PICC dressing policies required weekly or soiled dressing changes and physician orders for dressing type and frequency.
Failure to Identify and Monitor Trauma History
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and provide ongoing monitoring of identified past trauma for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Trauma Informed Care, including residents with documented PTSD. For one resident, the record showed diagnoses that included alcohol abuse, anxiety disorder, depression, dementia, homelessness, and PTSD, with moderate cognitive impairment on the most recent MDS. Although the care plan included several psychosocial and behavioral focuses, it did not include an individualized focus for PTSD or past trauma. Social Services progress notes from admission through the survey period did not address PTSD, and the medical record did not include the required Social Services social history, initial assessment, or ongoing quarterly monitoring/assessments. During observation and interviews, staff members who regularly cared for the resident stated they knew him well, but they were unaware of any special mental health needs, trauma history, or unique findings. The resident was observed sitting alone in his wheelchair with the privacy curtain drawn, and he was unable to recall his past life history. The guardian could not be reached for interview. The DON stated Social Services was responsible for admission and quarterly assessments to identify psychosocial needs and that PTSD required a separate care plan for triggers, but he could not locate any Social Services assessments in the record. For the second resident, the record showed diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, PTSD, and a right femur fracture, with moderate cognitive impairment and dependence for ADLs and transfers. The care plan addressed impaired cognitive function and dementia/PTSD in general terms, but it did not include specific interventions for PTSD or triggers. A psychiatric NP documented a history of significant trauma with nightmares, flashbacks, and hypervigilance, and noted that trauma and triggers should be addressed in the care plan. Staff interviews showed the resident was confused at times, stayed in bed, was resistive to care at times, and did not like his private area touched during care, yet staff could not identify or explain any trauma-related needs. The MDS coordinator and ADON acknowledged the care plan should reflect interventions to address triggers based on the resident’s trauma.
Failure to Follow Grievance Process and Incomplete Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its established grievance process for two residents who voiced concerns regarding their care. One resident, with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for hygiene. This resident filed a grievance about prolonged wait times to get out of bed and staff turning off the call light. Although the Social Services Director (SSD) acknowledged the complaint and stated that staff had been educated, the grievance form was incomplete, unsigned, and did not document resolution, contrary to facility policy requiring prompt resolution and proper documentation. Another resident, also cognitively intact and with multiple medical conditions, reported being denied a shower on a non-scheduled night and subsequently being left soiled until the following morning. The grievance was not entered into the facility's grievance log, and the documentation was incomplete, lacking signatures, dates, and statements from all involved staff. The Social Service Assistant (SSA) and SSD confirmed the grievance was not logged, and the Director of Nursing (DON) admitted to incomplete staff interviews and missing documentation. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) acknowledged that the grievance was not properly reviewed or discussed by the management team. Facility policy requires that all grievances be logged, investigated, and resolved promptly, with residents kept informed of progress and provided with a written decision. In both cases, the facility did not adhere to its own grievance procedures, resulting in incomplete documentation, lack of timely resolution, and failure to keep residents appropriately apprised of the status of their grievances.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During High-Contact Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by not properly implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident requiring such measures. During an observation, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) responded to a call light for a resident with a suprapubic urinary catheter and a history of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization. The CNA donned only a mask and entered the room, later joined by another CNA and a private sitter, both of whom wore masks and gloves but not gowns. These staff members had just completed bathing and dressing the resident and were preparing to transfer him using a mechanical lift, all of which are high-contact care activities requiring both gloves and gowns per EBP protocols. When questioned, the staff indicated they believed gowns were not necessary for this type of care, despite signage on the door and facility policy indicating otherwise. Further interviews revealed that the registered nurse (RN) assigned to the unit also misunderstood the requirements for EBP, stating that gowns were only needed for airborne precautions and not for residents with MDROs or indwelling catheters. The Infection Preventionist (IP), who also served as Assistant Director of Nursing and Staff Development, confirmed that staff had been educated on EBP but acknowledged that there was no ongoing surveillance process to monitor adherence to PPE protocols. Additionally, the list of residents requiring EBP was found to be inaccurate, missing two residents who should have been included. Record review for the affected resident showed active orders for EBP due to the presence of a suprapubic catheter and a history of MDRO, with care plans reflecting the need for assistance with activities of daily living. Facility policy required gowns and gloves to be available near or outside the resident's room and mandated staff compliance with EBP during high-contact care activities. However, during the survey, PPE supplies were not observed at the point of care, and staff failed to follow established protocols, resulting in a breakdown of infection control practices.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 47 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Melbourne
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian River Center | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| West Melbourne Health & Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Life Care Center Of Melbourne | 4.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Melbourne Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 4.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Avante At Melbourne Inc | 4.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of Melbourne.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.