Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Grove Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center And Reh during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents did not have accurate MDS assessments reflecting their nutritional status, including unreported weight loss and omission of therapeutic diets, despite documentation in their medical records and acknowledgment by the dietician and MDS Coordinator.
A resident was admitted without a diagnosis of serious mental illness or intellectual disability, but later developed multiple mental health conditions, including delusional disorders and major depressive disorder. Despite these changes and a new prescription for Olanzapine, the facility did not update the PASRR assessment as required, as confirmed by both the DON and Regional Nurse Consultant.
A resident with ESRD and a tunneled dialysis catheter did not have their care plan updated after dialysis treatments were placed on hold. The care plan continued to list regular dialysis sessions and did not address the need for CVC dressing changes or new orders, despite the resident not receiving dialysis or proper dressing care for over two weeks. Staff confirmed the lapse, and facility policy requires care plan updates after significant changes.
Two residents did not receive care according to professional standards: one with a central venous catheter had an undated dressing and no documented dressing changes after dialysis was paused, and another with a pressure injury received wound care without a physician order or proper documentation, contrary to facility policy.
Two residents did not receive respiratory care in accordance with physician orders and facility policy. One resident with COPD received oxygen without the required humidity and was found with an almost empty oxygen tank, while another resident's CPAP mask was improperly stored on the bed rail instead of in its designated bag. Staff interviews confirmed these practices did not meet established standards.
Surveyors identified a medication error rate of 5.88% due to two incidents: an LPN administered a heparin flush in a volume inconsistent with the physician's order, and another LPN prepared to crush and administer a delayed-release omeprazole tablet via G-tube, contrary to both the order and facility policy. The DON confirmed that staff are expected to follow physician orders and protocols.
A resident with a physician-ordered vegetarian, no added salt (NAS) diet was served a meal containing cabbage with bacon, despite clear documentation of dietary preferences. The resident declined to eat the bacon-containing item and expressed dissatisfaction with the vegetarian options provided. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the resident's dietary needs, but the error occurred during meal assembly and verification.
A resident with type 2 diabetes did not have required blood sugar checks and insulin administration documented on two occasions, despite staff recalling that the care was provided. The MAR was left blank for these events, and interviews with LPNs and the DON confirmed that documentation was expected but not completed, in violation of facility policy.
Staff failed to use required PPE when entering a resident's room under contact precautions and did not wear gloves while directly handling food during meal distribution. A CNA entered a resident's room on contact isolation without donning gown and gloves, and an LPN handled multiple residents' food items with bare hands, despite facility policy requiring glove use. Both staff acknowledged the lapses during interviews.
A resident with diabetes experienced severe hypoglycemia, and an LPN administered glucose gel without a physician's order and failed to notify the provider. Despite further declines in blood sugar and a physician's order for Glucagon administration and possible ER transfer, staff did not follow these orders or document interventions appropriately. The resident became unresponsive, was eventually sent to the hospital, and did not survive. This failure to follow professional standards and physician orders led to Immediate Jeopardy.
A resident with diabetes experienced multiple episodes of hypoglycemia, during which an LPN administered glucose gel without a physician's order, failed to notify the provider, and did not follow physician orders for glucagon administration and emergency transfer. Documentation was incomplete, and the DON was not promptly informed. The resident became unresponsive and later died after being transported to the hospital. The facility's failure to implement change in condition protocols and follow physician orders led to Immediate Jeopardy.
A resident with diabetes experienced multiple episodes of hypoglycemia, during which an LPN administered glucose gel without a physician's order and failed to notify the provider. Despite physician orders for Glucagon administration and possible ER transfer, staff did not follow these instructions as the resident's condition worsened. The QAPI process failed to identify or address these deficiencies, and the resident ultimately died after delayed emergency intervention.
A resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus experienced multiple episodes of low blood sugar, requiring interventions including oral glucose gel and glucagon. The LPN on duty did not consistently document blood glucose checks, the administration of glucose gel lacked a physician's order, and there was no record of physician notification regarding the low blood sugar event. The DON confirmed documentation gaps, including missing post-intervention blood sugar values, which did not meet facility policy for complete and accurate medical records.
A facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate PPE for a resident on contact precautions. Despite a sign indicating the need for gowns and gloves, two CNAs entered the room and provided care without the required PPE. Interviews revealed a lack of awareness about which resident required precautions, and the DON confirmed the necessity of PPE in such situations.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Nutrition and Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents in relation to their nutritional status. For one resident, a significant weight loss of 10.13% over six months was documented in the medical record and noted by the registered dietician, who had identified the resident as at risk for malnutrition and weight loss. Despite this, the quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect the weight loss in Section K0300. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the section was coded incorrectly and confirmed the resident had experienced weight loss during the specified period. For another resident, physician orders indicated the use of nutritional supplements and a fortified, mechanical soft diet due to dementia with behavioral disturbance. However, the quarterly MDS assessment did not document the therapeutic diet under the relevant section. The resident's dietary profile confirmed the use of supplements and fortified foods, and the MDS Coordinator admitted that the therapeutic diet should have been marked as present in the assessment.
Failure to Update PASRR Assessment for Resident with New Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate assessments for a resident with newly identified or possible serious mental disorders. Review of the resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) showed no diagnosis or suspicion of serious mental illness or intellectual disability at the time of admission. However, subsequent documentation in the resident's admission record included diagnoses such as cognitive communication deficit, dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorders, persistent mood disorders, recurrent major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder, with onset dates after the initial PASRR. Additionally, a physician order was present for Olanzapine to treat delusional disorders. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed that the PASRR was outdated and did not reflect the resident's current mental health status, and both indicated that a new PASRR should have been completed. Facility policy requires ongoing coordination with the state-designated authority and reassessment when a significant change in a resident's status occurs, which was not done in this case.
Failure to Revise Care Plan After Dialysis Placed on Hold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for a resident following a significant change in their dialysis treatment. The resident, who had a right-sided tunneled dialysis catheter placed for treatment of end stage renal disease (ESRD), reported not having received dialysis for over two weeks and noted that their access dressing had not been changed appropriately. The resident stated that the original dressing had fallen off and was replaced with gauze by a nurse, but there was no ongoing order for dressing changes since dialysis had been placed on hold. Staff interviews confirmed that the last dialysis session occurred on May 29, 2025, and that only RNs are permitted to perform central venous catheter (CVC) dressing changes, with no current orders in place for this care. Review of the resident's care plan showed it still reflected ongoing dialysis treatments and did not indicate that dialysis had been placed on hold after the last treatment date. The care plan also did not address the need for updated orders or care instructions regarding the CVC dressing in the absence of regular dialysis visits. Facility policy requires that care plans be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including significant changes, but this was not done in this case.
Failure to Provide Proper CVC and Wound Care per Physician Orders and Facility Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide health care services consistent with professional standards of practice for two residents. One resident with a central venous catheter (CVC) had a dressing that was not dated and reported that the dressing had not been changed for over two weeks after dialysis was held. The resident stated that the dressing fell off and a nurse replaced it with gauze, but no formal dressing change was performed. Staff interviews revealed that only RNs were permitted to change CVC dressings, and there was no current order for dressing changes after dialysis was paused. The facility did not have a policy for care of hemodialysis CVCs, and there was a lack of clear direction or physician orders for ongoing site care after dialysis was discontinued. Another resident with a pressure injury on the coccyx area did not have a physician order for wound care, and the treatment administration record did not document any wound care provided. Staff interviews indicated that nurses occasionally applied zinc cream to the area, but there was no consistent documentation or evidence of provider notification or wound care orders. The facility's policy required wound care to be performed according to physician orders and documented in the clinical record, but these steps were not followed, resulting in the wound being overlooked.
Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for two residents as required by professional standards and physician orders. One resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had a physician order for oxygen at 2-4 liters per minute via nasal cannula with humidity to maintain oxygen saturation above 90%. Observations revealed that the resident was repeatedly receiving oxygen at various flow rates without the required humidity, both from a portable tank and a concentrator. The resident also reported feeling she was not getting enough oxygen and was found with an almost empty oxygen tank, requiring staff intervention to switch to a concentrator. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff should check oxygen tank levels and that humidity orders should be followed. Another resident with a physician order for CPAP every shift was observed with the CPAP mask hanging from the bed rail and not stored in the designated bag, which was undated and placed on the bedside table. The resident expressed concern about improper storage of the mask, and an LPN confirmed that the mask should be stored in the bag and not hung on the bed. Review of facility policy indicated that respiratory equipment should be used per physician orders and infection control techniques should be maintained, but these procedures were not followed for the residents involved.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold Due to Improper Administration Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5 percent, with an observed error rate of 5.88%. One incident involved an LPN administering a heparin flush to a resident using a 5-milliliter dose instead of the 10-milliliter dose ordered by the physician. The LPN stated that their usual practice was to perform a heparin flush before and after medication administration, but the physician order specified a 10-milliliter flush every shift. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff are expected to follow physician orders and the SASH protocol, and the facility's competency checklist also required adherence to proper dosage and administration guidelines. Another incident involved an LPN preparing to crush and administer a delayed-release omeprazole tablet via a gastric tube for a resident, contrary to the physician's order, which specified an oral capsule to be given via G-tube. The LPN acknowledged that delayed-release medications should not be given via G-tube and indicated the need to clarify the order with the provider. The Director of Nursing reiterated that nurses should clarify any questionable orders before administration, and the facility's policy stated that certain medications, including delayed-release forms, should not be crushed and administered via enteral feeding tubes.
Failure to Accommodate Vegetarian Diet Preferences
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a physician-ordered vegetarian, no added salt (NAS) diet was served a meal containing cabbage with bacon. The resident's dietary profile and meal ticket clearly indicated vegetarian preferences, yet the meal tray included an item inconsistent with these requirements. The resident identified the presence of bacon in her cabbage and declined to eat it, stating she does not eat bacon due to her vegetarian diet. Photographic evidence was obtained to document the meal tray contents. Interviews with staff revealed that the dietary and nursing teams were aware of the resident's vegetarian status, and the facility had policies in place requiring nursing staff to verify meal accuracy and dietary staff to accommodate resident preferences. Despite these procedures, the error occurred, and staff could not recall how the incorrect item was served. The resident reported dissatisfaction with the vegetarian options provided, and staff interviews confirmed the process for meal assembly and verification, but did not identify how the mistake was made.
Incomplete Documentation of Insulin Administration and Blood Sugar Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurate for a resident receiving insulin for type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Specifically, review of the resident's physician order indicated that blood sugar checks and insulin administration were to be documented according to a sliding scale protocol. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed missing documentation for both blood sugar readings and insulin coverage on two separate occasions. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that while they recalled performing the required blood sugar checks and insulin administration, they could not explain why the documentation was left blank. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff are expected to document medication administration accurately and as required. Facility policies on medication administration and charting require that all medications administered and services performed be documented in the resident's clinical record or MAR. Despite these policies, the required documentation was not completed for the resident on the specified dates, resulting in incomplete medical records. The deficiency was identified through observation, interview, and record review, confirming that the facility did not adhere to its own documentation standards for medication management.
Failure to Use PPE and Perform Proper Hand Hygiene During Resident Care and Meal Distribution
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and perform proper hand hygiene in two separate instances. In the first instance, a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) entered the room of a resident who was on contact precautions without donning the required gown and gloves, despite clear signage and available PPE supplies at the room entrance. The CNA then exited the room with a breakfast tray, placing it in the food cart, and acknowledged during interview that proper PPE should have been worn. Facility policy required gloves and gowns to be worn upon entry into rooms under contact precautions, with hand hygiene performed before leaving the care environment. In the second instance, an LPN was observed distributing meals in the memory care unit dining room and directly handling residents' food items, such as spreading jelly on bread, without wearing gloves. The LPN performed hand hygiene between residents but did not use gloves while touching the food, contrary to facility policy and expectations. The Director of Nursing confirmed that gloves should be used when staff touch food items for residents. The LPN stated unfamiliarity with the unit and acknowledged the omission of glove use, despite having sanitized hands.
Failure to Follow Hypoglycemia Protocol and Physician Orders Results in Immediate Jeopardy
Penalty
Summary
A facility failed to provide treatment and care according to professional standards of practice for a resident experiencing a change in condition related to hypoglycemia. The resident, who had a history of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and was under orders for regular blood glucose monitoring, experienced a series of low blood sugar readings. At one point, an LPN administered glucose gel without a physician's order and did not notify the provider of the resident's low blood sugar value. Subsequent blood sugar checks revealed further declines, and the resident became less responsive. Despite a physician's order to administer Glucagon intramuscularly if blood sugar dropped below 60 and to send the resident to the emergency room if there was no positive response, the facility did not follow these orders. When the resident's blood sugar dropped to 50 and then to 32, Glucagon was not administered as directed, the provider was not notified, and the resident was not sent to the emergency room as required. Documentation of blood sugar checks and interventions was incomplete, and the facility's policies for change in condition and physician notification were not followed. The resident was eventually transported to the hospital by emergency medical services but did not survive. Interviews with staff and review of records confirmed that physician orders were not followed, documentation was lacking, and professional standards for the management of hypoglycemia were not met. The failure to implement appropriate interventions and notify the physician placed all residents at risk and resulted in a determination of Immediate Jeopardy.
Removal Plan
- The DON/designee completed a comprehensive audit of active residents in the facility with orders for blood sugar monitoring to ensure insulin administration was documented to identify concerns related to insulin administration in accordance with physician orders including administration of hypoglycemia interventions with documentation of repeat blood sugars.
- The DON/designee completed a review of residents who return to the hospital to ensure timeliness of RTH (return to hospital) as it related to hypoglycemia was carried out.
- The DON/designee completed a comprehensive audit of active residents in the facility with change in condition to validate physician was notified and if blood sugar was completed as ordered.
- An Ad Hoc QA (Quality Assurance) meeting was held for investigation of the concern and determination of the root cause analysis.
- Staff A, LPN, received 1:1 education on hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia protocol, and change in condition.
- The facility initiated a systemic change to include the notification to the DON/ADON when hypoglycemic interventions are initiated.
- Licensed nurses received education on blood sugar monitoring, documentation of results, follow up with physician, guideline for diabetes management, policy and procedure on change in condition, and notification of DON/ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) when hypoglycemic interventions initiated.
Failure to Follow Hypoglycemia Protocol and Physician Orders Results in Immediate Jeopardy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer care in a manner that ensured effective and efficient use of resources to maintain the highest practical well-being of each resident, as evidenced by the handling of a resident experiencing hypoglycemia. The resident, who had a history of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and was under orders for regular blood glucose monitoring and emergency glucagon administration for low blood sugar, experienced a series of hypoglycemic episodes. On one occasion, the resident's blood sugar was found to be 72, and an LPN administered glucose gel without a physician's order and did not notify the provider. Subsequently, the resident became less responsive, and later, a critically low blood sugar of 42 was recorded. The on-call physician was contacted and ordered glucagon administration, monitoring, and transfer to the emergency room if there was no positive response. Despite these orders, when the resident's blood sugar dropped again to 50 and then to 32, glucagon was not administered as directed, the provider was not notified, and the resident was not sent to the emergency room as per the physician's instructions. Documentation was incomplete, and there was a lack of timely and appropriate follow-up on the resident's deteriorating condition. Interviews with staff and review of records revealed that the nurse did not document all blood sugar checks, did not follow the expected protocol for hypoglycemia management, and lacked documented competency training regarding glucagon administration. The DON and other clinical leaders were not promptly informed, and the incident was not identified as a reportable event or brought to the facility's QAPI process in a timely manner. The resident ultimately became unresponsive and was transported to the hospital, where they did not survive. The facility's failure to implement its policies and procedures for change in condition, notify the physician as required, and follow physician orders for hypoglycemia management resulted in a determination of Immediate Jeopardy. This deficiency placed all residents at risk who might experience a change in condition requiring prompt and appropriate intervention.
Removal Plan
- The DON/designee completed a comprehensive audit of active residents in the facility with orders for blood sugar monitoring to ensure insulin administration was documented to identify concerns related to insulin administration in accordance with physician orders including administration of hypoglycemia interventions with documentation of repeat blood sugars.
- The DON/designee completed a review of residents who return to the hospital to ensure timeliness of RTH (return to hospital) as it related to hypoglycemia was carried out.
- The DON/designee completed a comprehensive audit of active residents in the facility with change in condition to validate physician was notified and if blood sugar was completed as ordered.
- An Ad Hoc QA (Quality Assurance) meeting was held for investigation of the concern and determination of the root cause analysis.
- Staff A, LPN, received one on one education on hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia protocol, and change in condition.
- The facility initiated a systemic change to include the notification to the DON/ADON when hypoglycemic interventions are initiated.
- Licensed nurses received education on blood sugar monitoring, documentation of results, follow up with physician, guideline for diabetes management, policy and procedure on change in condition, and notification of DON/ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) when hypoglycemic interventions initiated.
- VPCS (Vice President of Clinical Services) reeducated the Clinical Management Team including the Administrator and Director of Nursing on the components of job descriptions.
- The Administrator/designees and Director of Nursing Services designee will ensure that the safety and well-being as it related to blood glucose monitoring and treatment is maintained by the continued participation, evaluation, and intervention through Dashboard, Risk reports, RTH Resident records and hour report review during clinical standup and stand down meeting, and maintaining QA/PI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) process.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders and QAPI Process in Hypoglycemia Event
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to utilize its Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, identify, and implement an effective performance improvement plan regarding the management of a resident's change in condition and adherence to physician orders. Specifically, a resident with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and a history of blood sugar monitoring experienced multiple episodes of hypoglycemia. On one occasion, an LPN administered glucose gel without a physician's order and did not notify the provider when the resident's blood sugar was 72. Subsequently, the resident became less responsive, and further blood sugar checks revealed dangerously low values. Despite a physician's order to administer Glucagon intramuscularly and send the resident to the emergency room if there was no positive response, the facility staff did not follow these instructions. When the resident's blood sugar dropped below 60 for a second time and the resident was unresponsive, the provider was not notified, Glucagon was not administered as ordered, and the resident was not sent to the emergency room. The resident's condition continued to deteriorate, with a blood sugar value of 32, and only then was emergency medical services contacted. The resident was transported to a hospital and did not survive. Interviews and record reviews revealed that the facility's QAPI process did not identify this event as a reportable incident or an area in need of improvement. The DON and nurse managers reviewed the case but failed to recognize deficiencies in care, documentation, and adherence to professional standards. The facility's policies and procedures for change in condition, physician notification, and following physician orders were not implemented, leading to a determination of Immediate Jeopardy.
Removal Plan
- The DON/designee completed a comprehensive audit of active residents in the facility with orders for blood sugar monitoring to ensure insulin administration was documented to identify concerns related to insulin administration in accordance with physician orders including administration of hypoglycemia interventions with documentation of repeat blood sugars.
- The DON/designee completed a review of residents who return to the hospital to ensure timeliness of RTH as it related to hypoglycemia was carried out.
- The DON/designee completed a comprehensive audit of active residents in the facility with change in condition to validate physician was notified and if blood sugar was completed as ordered.
- An Ad Hoc QA meeting was held for investigation of the concern and determination of the root cause analysis.
- Staff A, LPN, received 1:1 education on hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia protocol, and change in condition.
- The facility initiated a systemic change to include the notification to the DON/ADON when hypoglycemic interventions are initiated.
- Licensed nurses received education on blood sugar monitoring, documentation of results, follow up with physician, guideline for diabetes management, policy and procedure on change in condition, and notification of DON/ADON when hypoglycemic interventions initiated.
- VPCS reeducated the Clinical Management Team including the Administrator and Director of Nursing on the components of job descriptions and 5 elements of QAPI, root cause analysis, QAPI at a glance, and QAPI self-assessment tool.
- The Administrator/designees and Director of Nursing Services designee will ensure that the safety and well-being as it related to blood glucose monitoring and treatment is maintained by the continued participation, evaluation, and intervention through Dashboard, Risk reports, RTH Resident records and hour report review during clinical standup and stand down meeting, and maintaining QA/PI process.
- An Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was convened to review the components of ongoing PIP and review the findings of F867 QAPI/QAA.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Medical Record Documentation for Diabetic Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's medical records were complete and accurate, specifically for a resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer. Physician orders required blood glucose monitoring before meals and at bedtime, and the use of a glucagon emergency injection kit if blood sugar dropped below 60, with rechecks every two hours. On one occasion, the resident experienced low blood sugar, received oral glucose gel, and later glucagon was administered per on-call provider instructions. However, there was no documentation of a physician's order for the glucose gel, nor was there documentation that the physician was notified of the low blood sugar event and the administration of glucose gel. Additionally, blood sugar checks were not consistently documented, including post-administration values after glucagon was given. Interviews with the LPN involved revealed that blood sugar was checked more frequently than documented, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that documentation was incomplete, particularly regarding post-intervention blood sugar levels. Facility policies required that all medication administration, changes in condition, and interventions be documented in the clinical record, but these requirements were not met in this case. The lack of complete and accurate documentation constituted a failure to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Failure to Use PPE for Resident on Contact Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing direct care to a resident on transmission-based precautions. During an observation, it was noted that a sign on the door of the room shared by two residents indicated contact precautions, requiring staff to perform hand hygiene and wear gowns and gloves before entering and exiting the room. However, two certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were observed entering the room and providing care without wearing the required PPE. Staff A, a CNA, took vital signs of a resident with a diagnosis of MRSA without wearing a gown or gloves. Staff B, another CNA, entered the room, interacted with both residents, and handled linens without wearing a gown or gloves. Interviews with the CNAs revealed a lack of awareness regarding which resident was on contact precautions, despite the presence of a sign on the door. Both CNAs acknowledged that they should have worn the appropriate PPE. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff should always wear PPE in rooms with contact precaution signs, not just during direct patient care. The facility's policy on transmission-based precautions was reviewed, which clearly outlined the requirement for wearing gloves and gowns when entering rooms with contact precautions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 100 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hernando
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviata At Brentwood | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Diamond Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Life Care Center Of Citrus County | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Arbor Trail Rehab And Skilled Nursing Center | 7.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Citrus Health And Rehabilitation Center | 7.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Grove Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center And Reh.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.