Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Finnish-american Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to meet food safety standards, with expired spices, improperly dated food items, and refrigerators exceeding temperature requirements, potentially affecting all residents. Observations included expired paprika and curry powder, undated herring and turkey breast, and refrigerators with temperatures above the required 41 degrees Fahrenheit.
Two residents were not provided dining in a dignified manner, as CNAs failed to engage with them during meals. One CNA was observed using a personal cell phone, violating facility policy. Both residents required assistance with eating due to cognitive impairments, but the staff did not interact with them until meals were served. Interviews with staff confirmed the expectation of interaction during dining, highlighting a deficiency in maintaining resident dignity.
The facility failed to prepare meals according to the dietary needs of residents requiring pureed diets and nectar consistency fluids. Observations revealed that residents were served meals with incorrect textures, such as lumpy pureed foods and regular texture oatmeal, despite their dietary orders. These deficiencies were confirmed by the RD and CDM, indicating a failure to adhere to dietary requirements.
Food Safety and Storage Deficiencies Identified
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and the prevention of foodborne illnesses, potentially affecting all 41 residents who consume food orally. During an inspection of the main kitchen, expired paprika and curry powder were found on the shelves, and several items in the Arctic Air refrigerator #1, including dairy whipped topping, potato salad, and cranberry juice cocktail, were past their use-by dates. Additionally, the walk-in refrigerator contained a container of herring and an opened package of sliced turkey breast without any date labels. Further observations revealed that the Daeco refrigerator had a thick build-up of ice on the fan/motor unit, with the internal temperature at 46 degrees Fahrenheit, exceeding the required 41 degrees. The butter stored inside was also above the required temperature. The baking room refrigerator was found to be at 60 degrees Fahrenheit, with heavy whipping cream inside measuring 46.2 degrees. Moreover, bottles of orange and green food coloring lacked open dates, with one shipping label too faded to read. These findings were confirmed by the Certified Dietary Manager and the Registered Dietitian.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Mealtimes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide dining in a dignified manner for two residents, as observed during a lunch service in the Main Dining Room. Resident #6, who has multiple diagnoses including Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and requires supervision or assistance for eating, was not engaged by the CNA assigned to assist them. Instead, the CNA was observed using a personal cellular device during the meal, which is against the facility's policy. This lack of interaction and attention during mealtime did not honor the resident's right to a dignified existence and self-determination. Resident #12, who has a moderate cognitive impairment and requires partial assistance for eating, was also not engaged by the CNA during the meal. The CNA did not interact with the resident until the meal was served, failing to maintain the resident's dignity as outlined in the facility's policy. The resident's care plan indicates a need for substantial assistance during meals, which was not adequately provided. Interviews with staff, including the DON and ADON, confirmed that staff should be interacting with residents during dining. The facility's policy prohibits the use of personal cell phones in resident areas, yet this policy was not adhered to, as evidenced by the CNA's actions. The Registered Dietitian also acknowledged that such behavior is unacceptable and intervenes when observed. These actions and inactions contributed to the deficiency in maintaining resident dignity during mealtimes.
Failure to Prepare Meals According to Residents' Dietary Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prepare food in a form that meets the individual needs of residents requiring pureed diets and nectar consistency fluids. Observations revealed that several residents were served meals that did not adhere to their prescribed dietary requirements. For instance, Resident #12, who was on a pureed texture diet with nectar thickened liquids, was served lumpy pureed pork and eggs, which did not meet the smooth, homogenous consistency required for pureed diets. Additionally, Resident #11 was served lumpy pureed pork and corn bread, and regular texture oatmeal instead of pureed, despite being on a pureed diet. Resident #143, who required a pureed texture diet with nectar thick consistency fluids, was also served regular texture oatmeal instead of pureed. Similarly, Resident #4, who was on a pureed texture diet with nectar thick liquids, received lumpy pureed eggs and regular texture oatmeal. Furthermore, the coffee served to Resident #4 was not thickened to the required nectar consistency. These observations were confirmed by the Registered Dietitian and the Certified Dietary Manager, who acknowledged the discrepancies in food preparation. The deficiencies were identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews, which highlighted the facility's failure to adhere to dietary orders and ensure that meals were prepared according to the residents' specific needs. The facility's policy for puree food preparation was not followed, resulting in meals that contained lumps and were not of the required consistency, posing potential risks to residents with dysphagia and other swallowing difficulties.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 195 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lake Worth
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Worth Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Vi At Lakeside Village | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Terraces Of Lake Worth Care Center And Rehab | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Hamlin Place Of Boynton Beach | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Medicana Nursing And Rehab Center | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Finnish-american Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.