Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Delaney Park Health And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not have a qualified Infection Preventionist overseeing the IPCP after the ADON position became vacant. The DON, who was assigned the role, lacked current specialized training and certification as required, with only outdated training and no CBIC certification provided.
Ceiling vent covers in 30 resident rooms were observed to have discoloration and rust, with surfaces ranging from black to white and rust-colored edges. A resident's representative expressed concerns about the unsanitary appearance, and the Maintenance Director confirmed the vents were old, had been painted, and were maintained by scraping and repainting rather than replacement.
The facility did not implement enhanced barrier precautions for residents with wounds, indwelling devices, or MDRO colonization on one unit, failed to ensure transmission-based isolation was the least restrictive for a resident colonized with C. auris, and did not document or conduct process surveillance of infection control practices. Staff were unclear about required precautions, PPE was not available or used as required, and signage for TBP was missing for a resident with C. diff. The DON, acting as interim IP, confirmed these deficiencies and the lack of accurate records.
A resident with a recent femur fracture and pulmonary disease developed pain, swelling, redness, and warmth in her surgical leg. Nursing staff documented these symptoms and administered pain medication but did not notify the physician as required by facility policy. The resident was later hospitalized and diagnosed with DVT, revealing a failure to ensure prompt physician notification and intervention.
A resident with dementia and no documented history of psychosis was prescribed and later had an increased dose of Risperdal for a new diagnosis of schizophrenia, despite assessments and behavior records showing no evidence of psychosis or behavioral symptoms. The care plan lacked resident-centered interventions, and facility leadership could not provide documentation to support the diagnosis or medication changes.
A resident with multiple medical conditions was discharged AMA without proper documentation, investigation, or provision of essential discharge information. Facility staff could not provide evidence of a physician's discharge order, an AMA form, notification to the physician, or that the resident received a medication list and follow-up instructions.
A resident did not receive treatment and care in accordance with physician orders and their own preferences and goals, resulting in a deficiency related to individualized care planning and delivery.
A resident did not receive the necessary care and services to maintain or improve ROM, limited ROM, or mobility, and there was no documented medical reason for the decline.
A resident with significant physical and cognitive impairments was not consistently provided with a physician-ordered right elbow splint, despite documentation by an LPN indicating otherwise. The resident was repeatedly observed without the splint, and the LPN acknowledged documenting its application without direct verification. The unit manager and DON confirmed that staff were expected to ensure the splint was applied and documentation was accurate, but this did not occur.
The QAPI committee did not identify or address ongoing systemic non-compliance with infection prevention and control, as shown by repeat deficiencies and the absence of a current PIP or audits. The Administrator confirmed that monitoring of the previous plan of correction had ended, and there was no documentation of ongoing QAPI activities for infection control.
The facility did not ensure that oxygen concentrators were kept in safe, working order for several oxygen-dependent residents. Multiple concentrators in use showed caution lights or were labeled as failed, and staff could not consistently explain or track the status of these units. Family members reported malfunctioning equipment, but some units remained in use despite warnings, and there was no clear process for removing or replacing failed concentrators.
A resident with severe respiratory conditions and impaired cognition was observed receiving oxygen at a higher flow rate than ordered by the physician. Staff confirmed the oxygen concentrator was set at 3 LPM instead of the prescribed 2 LPM, and the DON stated that nurses are expected to verify and follow physician orders for oxygen therapy.
A facility failed to follow a physician's order for a resident's oxygen therapy, setting it at 3 LPM instead of the prescribed 5 LPM. The resident, who had been working to reduce her oxygen dependency, was distressed by the adjustment. Nursing staff documented administering 5 LPM despite not doing so, and the discrepancy went unnoticed until a survey. The DON confirmed the requirement to follow orders and check settings each shift, which was not adhered to.
The facility failed to store food in accordance with safety standards, with a walk-in refrigerator left open, resulting in unsafe temperatures, and improperly stored food items in the freezer. The facility's policy of sealing, labeling, and dating opened food items was not followed.
A cognitively intact resident was found with medications on her nightstand, administered by her spouse without physician orders or a self-administration evaluation. The facility's policy required such evaluations and orders, which were not in place, leading to a deficiency.
A facility failed to complete a discharge MDS Assessment for a resident who was discharged home. The Clinical Reimbursement Director admitted the oversight, noting the assessment was 124 days overdue due to inconsistent report running. The MDS 3.0 RAI Manual requires discharge assessments to be completed and submitted within specific timeframes, which were not met in this case.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents, leading to deficiencies in evaluating their functional abilities related to eating, vision, and dental status. One resident was inaccurately assessed as independent in eating despite requiring assistance, while another's vision and dental status were misrepresented, showing no need for corrective lenses or dental issues despite evidence to the contrary.
A resident with a midline catheter did not receive timely IV dressing changes as required by facility policy. The resident, who was immunocompromised and diabetic, had an IV site dressing dated 5/24/24, but the last documented change was on 5/29/24. RN H admitted to not documenting a change on 5/24/24 and incorrectly documenting a change on 5/29/24. RN F also failed to notice the overdue dressing change. The DON confirmed the expectation for timely dressing changes to prevent infection.
A resident with infections requiring contact isolation was not placed on the necessary precautions upon admission to the facility, despite having a physician's order. The resident informed staff of her isolation status from the hospital, but PPE and other measures were not implemented until days later. The nursing staff acknowledged the oversight, despite having the necessary equipment and procedures available.
Lack of Qualified Infection Preventionist for Infection Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), who was previously responsible for overseeing the IPCP, had vacated the position three weeks prior to the survey. In the absence of the ADON, the Director of Nursing (DON) was designated by the Administrator to serve as the IP, in addition to her full-time responsibilities as DON. The job description for the ADON required maintaining Infection Preventionist Certification, and the role included oversight of the IPCP and the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Upon review of the DON's qualifications, it was found that she had professional nursing training and an active RN license, but lacked current specialized training or certification as an Infection Preventionist. The only evidence of relevant training provided was participation in a Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course over four years prior and a certificate for 2.5 continuing education units in Universal Infection Prevention and Control from the previous year. The DON confirmed she was not certified in Infection Prevention and Control from the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) and had not worked as an IP since completing the earlier educational activity.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Sanitary Vent Covers in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in 30 resident rooms on the first floor by not ensuring that ceiling vent covers were kept clean and sanitary. Observations revealed that the vent covers displayed a range of discoloration from black to white, with rust-colored substances present around the edges. A resident representative reported concerns about the unsanitary appearance of the vents, describing them as having a mold-like substance or debris accumulation. The Maintenance Director confirmed that all vent covers on the first floor showed signs of wear and tear, had been painted black, but still exhibited visible white and rust colors. He acknowledged that the black color could be interpreted as mold by some, but stated it was not mold. The vents were maintained by scraping off rust and repainting rather than replacing them, as they were old and worn.
Failure to Implement and Document Infection Control Precautions and Surveillance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention and control policies and procedures, resulting in multiple deficiencies related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), transmission-based precautions (TBP), and process surveillance. On the first floor (100 unit), there was no evidence of EBP implementation for residents with conditions such as pressure ulcers, tube feeding, indwelling catheters, or tracheostomies, despite facility policy and CDC guidance requiring such measures. PPE was not readily available, and signage indicating EBP was absent. The policy and procedure for EBP lacked critical language from regulatory guidance, and staff, including the unit manager, were unaware of the requirements. The DON, acting as interim infection preventionist, acknowledged the lack of EBP implementation and inaccurate resident lists for precautions. A resident with a history of cerebral palsy, tracheostomy, gastrostomy tube, and colonization with Candida auris was placed on contact isolation upon admission, despite only being colonized and not actively infected. The care plan and physician's order indicated indefinite contact isolation, but there was no documentation supporting the need for such restrictive measures, nor was the use of least restrictive isolation considered. Staff were unclear about the appropriate use of EBP versus contact precautions, and the resident was not listed as having an active infection in the facility's records. The facility also failed to document and conduct process surveillance of infection control practices, as required by its own policies. The infection control risk assessment lacked supporting data and documentation of surveillance activities. Additionally, another resident admitted with C. difficile infection was placed on TBP, but appropriate signage was not posted on the door, and staff were unaware of the specific precautions required. The DON, acting as interim IP, confirmed the lack of signage and process surveillance documentation, and staff did not consistently follow TBP protocols.
Failure to Notify Physician of Change in Resident Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in a resident's condition, resulting in a deficiency related to prompt diagnosis and treatment. A resident admitted for short-term rehabilitation with a history of orthopedic aftercare, a femur fracture, shortness of breath, and interstitial pulmonary disease, was documented by nursing staff to have pain, swelling, redness, and warmth in her surgical leg. On one occasion, the nurse noted these symptoms and administered pain medication but did not notify the physician or document any such notification, despite the facility's policy requiring physician notification for significant changes in condition. Previous assessments had shown no edema at admission, but subsequent notes indicated the development of generalized edema, pain, and warmth in the lower extremities. Although the physician was notified on an earlier date when similar symptoms were present, there was no documentation of physician notification when the symptoms recurred and worsened. The resident was later transferred to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the affected leg. The facility's policy required timely notification and documentation of such changes, which was not followed in this instance.
Unnecessary Antipsychotic Use Without Supporting Documentation
Penalty
Summary
A resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and anxiety. Initial and quarterly assessments indicated no evidence of psychosis, behavioral symptoms, or a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Behavioral notes documented no psychiatric history and no further need for psychological intervention. Despite this, the resident was prescribed Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication, for 'psychosis with paranoia/auditory hallucinations' after being observed scratching himself. The care plan focused on administering psychotropic medication and documenting behaviors but did not include resident-centered interventions specific to the scratching behavior or address the circumstances surrounding it. Behavior monitoring records showed no observed behaviors during the relevant period. A nurse reported the resident was generally happy, with only a brief mention of expressed worries at night. Following a visit from a Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, the Risperdal dose was increased and a new diagnosis of schizophrenia was added, despite documentation indicating no psychotic symptoms. The facility was unable to provide documentation supporting the new diagnosis or the medication increase, and the behavioral services group emphasized the need for extensive documentation and clear symptoms before such changes. No further explanation or documentation was provided by facility leadership.
Failure to Document and Ensure Safe AMA Discharge
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple diagnoses, including a clavicle fracture, abnormal gait, morbid obesity, and malaise, was discharged against medical advice (AMA) without proper documentation or investigation by facility staff. The resident was responsible for her own care and had a daughter, but the medical record lacked a discharge summary and a physician's discharge order. There was no evidence in the record that the resident was safely discharged, and staff could not explain why the resident did not complete her prescribed six weeks of therapy. The Rehabilitation Director, Social Worker, Business Office Manager, and Unit Manager all confirmed the absence of required documentation and could not provide details regarding the circumstances of the resident's departure or the provision of necessary discharge information. Further review revealed that the Social Worker was unable to locate an AMA form or evidence that the physician was notified of the resident's AMA discharge. There was also no documentation that the resident received a medication list or instructions to follow up with her provider. The Business Office Manager confirmed that the resident was not informed about potential Medicare non-payment for leaving AMA, and the Unit Manager could not identify the nurse responsible at the time of discharge. Overall, the facility failed to ensure a safe and documented discharge process for the resident who left AMA, as required.
Failure to Provide Care According to Orders and Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves a failure to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders, as well as the resident's preferences and goals. The report indicates that care was not delivered in alignment with established directives or the expressed wishes and objectives of the resident, resulting in noncompliance with regulatory requirements for individualized care planning and execution.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Care for Range of Motion and Mobility
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the provision of care to maintain or improve a resident's range of motion (ROM), limited ROM, and/or mobility. The facility failed to ensure that appropriate care and services were provided to prevent a decline in these areas, except in cases where a decline was medically unavoidable. The report notes that the necessary interventions to support or enhance the resident's ROM or mobility were not implemented as required.
Failure to Accurately Document and Implement Physician Orders for Splint Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records and ensure proper implementation of physician orders for a resident requiring a right elbow splint. The resident, who had a history of stroke, hemiplegia, vascular dementia, and an acquired absence of the right leg below the knee, was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. Despite a physician's order for the resident to wear a right elbow splint during the daytime for four to six hours daily, multiple observations over several days showed the resident was not wearing the splint. The resident reported that staff did not apply the splint and that an aide was unaware of its location. Review of the Medication Administration Record revealed that nursing staff, specifically an LPN, documented that the splint was applied on several days when, in fact, the resident was not wearing it. The LPN admitted to documenting the application of the splint without verifying with the CNA or directly observing the resident. The unit manager and DON confirmed that CNAs were responsible for applying the splint and nurses were expected to ensure compliance with orders and provide accurate documentation. The inaccurate documentation and lack of verification led to the deficiency in maintaining medical records according to professional standards.
Failure to Sustain Infection Control QAPI Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify and address a systemic issue with the Infection Prevention & Control Program, as evidenced by repeat deficiencies cited during consecutive annual surveys. Despite a history of infection prevention and control deficiencies, the facility was unable to provide documentation of an active Process Improvement Plan (PIP) or current audits related to infection prevention and control at the time of the survey. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that monitoring for a previous plan of correction had been discontinued several months prior. The facility's policy requires the QAA&C Committee to review data, implement process improvement plans, and monitor their effectiveness, but there was no evidence that these steps were being followed for infection prevention and control.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Functional Oxygen Concentrators
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that oxygen concentrators were maintained in safe and functional condition for multiple oxygen-dependent residents. Observations and interviews revealed that several concentrators in use displayed yellow caution lights or were labeled as failed, indicating potential issues with oxygen purity or equipment malfunction. Family members reported malfunctioning units to staff, but some units continued to be used despite visible warnings. The Central Supply Coordinator and Nursing Home Administrator were unable to clearly explain the meaning of the yellow indicator lights or confirm which units had been replaced following failed inspections. Documentation showed that a significant number of concentrators had failed inspection, but there was no clear tracking of which units were removed from service or replaced. During a tour, four out of fourteen concentrators in resident rooms displayed yellow caution lights, and one had a failed sticker. The outside oxygen concentrator service provider confirmed that a yellow light could indicate a failure in oxygen purity and that such units should be removed from use. The facility's own policy required all essential equipment to be maintained in safe operating condition, but failed or potentially compromised concentrators were not promptly removed from use, placing residents at risk of receiving inadequate oxygen support.
Failure to Follow Physician's Order for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen therapy for a resident with multiple respiratory conditions, including respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD, and heart failure. The resident, who had severely impaired cognition, was readmitted from an acute care hospital with an order for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. The resident's care plan also directed nurses to administer oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. During an observation, the oxygen concentrator for the resident was found set at 3 LPM instead of the ordered 2 LPM. This discrepancy was confirmed by a registered nurse, who acknowledged the physician's order and stated that she had not yet checked the setting during her shift. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff were expected to verify oxygen settings against physician orders. The facility's policy required oxygen to be provided according to physician orders.
Failure to Follow Prescribed Respiratory Therapy Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician-prescribed respiratory therapy orders for a resident, leading to a deficiency in care. The resident's oxygen was set at 3 liters per minute (LPM), contrary to the physician's order of 5 LPM. This discrepancy was observed during a survey, and the assigned RN confirmed the order was for 5 LPM. The resident expressed distress when the oxygen level was adjusted to the prescribed 5 LPM, explaining that she had been working to reduce her oxygen dependency over the past two years. The resident believed the physician was aware of her preference for 3 LPM, and the nursing staff had been adjusting the oxygen level according to her request for about a year. The nursing staff, including RN C, failed to verify and administer the correct oxygen level as per the physician's order, despite documenting that the resident received 5 LPM of oxygen for the past six months. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the nursing staff was required to follow doctors' orders and check oxygen settings at every shift, but this was not done. The resident's oxygen saturation level was regularly checked and found to be satisfactory, but the discrepancy in the oxygen setting went unnoticed until the survey. The failure to adhere to the prescribed oxygen therapy order resulted in a pattern of non-compliance with the physician's directives.
Food Safety Standards Violation in Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to food safety standards in the storage of food items in the freezer and walk-in refrigerator, which could lead to foodborne illness. During an inspection, the walk-in refrigerator was found with its door left open, resulting in a temperature of 48 degrees Fahrenheit, which is above the acceptable range for safe food storage. A carton of Mighty Shake inside the refrigerator was measured at 47 degrees Fahrenheit, leading to the disposal of nine Mighty Shakes. Additionally, in the freezer, there were unlabeled, undated, and unsealed bags of sausage patties and vegetarian burger patties, both covered with ice crystals and frozen together, indicating improper storage. The facility's policy requires all food items to be sealed, labeled, and dated once opened, which was not followed in these instances.
Failure to Conduct Medication Self-Administration Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a medication self-administration assessment for a resident who was observed with medications on her nightstand. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, had been admitted with diagnoses including sequelae of cerebral infarction, anemia, heart failure, diabetes, and constipation. During an observation, the resident's spouse was seen administering eye drops and hydrocortisone cream, which he had brought from a previous facility, to the resident without any physician orders or a completed self-administration evaluation. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed that there were no physician orders for the medications found on the resident's nightstand and acknowledged that a self-administration evaluation had not been completed. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that for a resident to self-administer medications, a physician's order and a self-administration evaluation were required, along with a care plan and a lock box for safe storage. The facility's policy required a prescriber's order and an interdisciplinary team assessment to ensure the safety of self-administration, which were not in place for this resident.
Failure to Complete Discharge MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one resident who was reviewed for resident assessments. The resident was admitted to the facility and later discharged home with her daughter and husband. However, a review of the MDS tab in the medical record showed that a Discharge Assessment was neither initiated nor completed. The Clinical Reimbursement Director acknowledged the oversight, noting that the discharge assessment was 124 days overdue. She admitted to not running the necessary report consistently, which led to the missed assessment. According to Chapter 2 of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual, a Discharge Assessment is required for all discharges and must be completed when the resident is not expected to return within 30 days. The assessment should be completed within 14 days after the discharge date and submitted within 14 days after the MDS completion date. The failure to adhere to these requirements resulted in the deficiency.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Eating, Vision, and Dental Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, leading to deficiencies in evaluating their functional abilities related to eating, vision, and dental status. For one resident, the MDS assessment inaccurately indicated independence in eating, despite multiple observations and documentation showing the resident required assistance. The resident, diagnosed with conditions such as muscle wasting and dysphagia, was observed being fed by staff and was noted to have difficulty chewing. The MDS Director and RN acknowledged the assessment error, confirming the resident needed partial to moderate assistance with eating. Another resident's MDS assessment inaccurately reflected her vision and dental status. Despite having full upper and lower dentures and requiring glasses, the assessments indicated adequate vision without corrective lenses and no dental issues. Interviews and documentation revealed the resident had ill-fitting dentures, affecting her ability to chew, and was waiting for new glasses. The Clinical Reimbursement Director confirmed the inaccuracies in the MDS assessments, acknowledging the resident's use of dentures and glasses. The deficiencies were identified through a combination of observations, interviews, and record reviews, highlighting discrepancies between the residents' actual needs and the documented assessments. The facility's policy required interdisciplinary team participation in the assessment process, but the inaccuracies suggest a failure to adhere to these guidelines, resulting in the misrepresentation of the residents' functional abilities and needs.
Failure to Timely Change IV Dressing for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate intravenous (IV) care and services for a resident with a midline catheter, which is a type of IV access used for administering medications. The resident, who was readmitted with conditions including osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes, and pneumonia, had an order for Ceftazidime, an IV antibiotic, and required regular monitoring and maintenance of the IV site. The care plan specified that the IV dressing should be changed every seven days or as needed if soiled or dislodged. However, observations revealed that the dressing on the resident's IV site was not changed as required, with the last documented change occurring on 5/29/24, despite the dressing being dated 5/24/24. Registered Nurse (RN) H admitted to not documenting a dressing change on 5/24/24 and incorrectly documenting a change on 5/29/24. The nurse acknowledged the importance of maintaining the dressing to prevent complications, especially given the resident's immunocompromised and diabetic status. Another nurse, RN F, also failed to notice the overdue dressing change during her shifts. The Director of Nursing confirmed the expectation for timely dressing changes and acknowledged the oversight. The facility's policy required dressing changes every seven days to prevent infection, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Implement Contact Isolation Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions for a resident who required contact isolation due to infections with Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). The resident, who was admitted with a history of bacteremia, was not placed on contact isolation upon arrival, despite having a physician's order for such precautions. The resident herself reported that she had been in isolation at the hospital for a urine infection and informed the nursing staff upon her arrival at the facility. However, the necessary precautions, including the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), were not implemented until several days later. The primary nurse confirmed that the resident should have been placed on contact isolation immediately upon admission. The Director of Nursing stated that a checklist was used to ensure all orders were implemented, but it was not part of the medical record. Despite the availability of PPE and signage on the unit, the staff failed to follow the orders promptly, leading to a delay in implementing the necessary infection control measures. This oversight was acknowledged by the nursing staff, who confirmed that the resident's medical records and orders were reviewed, but the implementation of contact precautions was delayed.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 176 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Orlando
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westminster Towers | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| South Orange Health And Rehabilitation Center | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Commons At Orlando Lutheran Towers | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Orlando Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Guardian Care Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Delaney Park Health And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.