Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Implement and Document Infection Control Precautions and Surveillance

Orlando, Florida Survey Completed on 07-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention and control policies and procedures, resulting in multiple deficiencies related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), transmission-based precautions (TBP), and process surveillance. On the first floor (100 unit), there was no evidence of EBP implementation for residents with conditions such as pressure ulcers, tube feeding, indwelling catheters, or tracheostomies, despite facility policy and CDC guidance requiring such measures. PPE was not readily available, and signage indicating EBP was absent. The policy and procedure for EBP lacked critical language from regulatory guidance, and staff, including the unit manager, were unaware of the requirements. The DON, acting as interim infection preventionist, acknowledged the lack of EBP implementation and inaccurate resident lists for precautions. A resident with a history of cerebral palsy, tracheostomy, gastrostomy tube, and colonization with Candida auris was placed on contact isolation upon admission, despite only being colonized and not actively infected. The care plan and physician's order indicated indefinite contact isolation, but there was no documentation supporting the need for such restrictive measures, nor was the use of least restrictive isolation considered. Staff were unclear about the appropriate use of EBP versus contact precautions, and the resident was not listed as having an active infection in the facility's records. The facility also failed to document and conduct process surveillance of infection control practices, as required by its own policies. The infection control risk assessment lacked supporting data and documentation of surveillance activities. Additionally, another resident admitted with C. difficile infection was placed on TBP, but appropriate signage was not posted on the door, and staff were unaware of the specific precautions required. The DON, acting as interim IP, confirmed the lack of signage and process surveillance documentation, and staff did not consistently follow TBP protocols.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙