Claridge House Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in North Miami, Florida.
- Location
- 13900 Ne 3rd Court, North Miami, Florida 33161
- CMS Provider Number
- 105513
- Inspections on file
- 28
- Latest survey
- March 20, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 6
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Claridge House Nursing And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of dementia left the facility undetected, likely by following visitors, and was missing for several hours before being found by law enforcement miles away. The resident did not have a wander alert system bracelet at the time, and staff only noticed the absence when delivering lunch, indicating a lapse in supervision and monitoring protocols.
A resident with severe dementia and total dependence for ADLs was able to leave the facility undetected during a busy visitor period, despite not showing prior exit-seeking behavior. The absence of effective monitoring and security measures allowed the resident to exit unnoticed, resulting in the individual being missing for several hours before being found by law enforcement.
Two residents in an LTC facility experienced delays in receiving appropriate respiratory care during emergencies. One resident was in distress with gurgling sounds and drooling, but the attending RN did not perform necessary assessments before administering medication and suctioning. Another resident's respiratory distress was not immediately addressed by an LPN, leading to a delay in suctioning. The facility's failure to follow established protocols for respiratory care was acknowledged by the DON and staff.
A resident at high risk for aspiration was observed vomiting and showing signs of respiratory distress, but the facility staff failed to notify the family and physician of the change in condition. Despite the resident's symptoms, staff did not perform a thorough assessment or document the incident, violating the facility's policy on changes in condition.
The facility failed to prevent aspiration and secure PEG tubes for residents at risk. A resident was observed with vomit draining from her mouth, and nurses did not implement timely interventions. Two other residents had unsecured PEG tubes, increasing the risk of dislodgement. Staff interviews revealed a lack of understanding and implementation of necessary interventions to secure PEG tubes.
A facility failed to secure medications and ensure a resident received the full dosage during administration. An RN left medications unattended and did not ensure the resident received the full amount via PEG tube. The resident had a tracheostomy and was prescribed medications like Levetiracetam, Eliquis, and Tylenol. The RN acknowledged leaving the medications unattended, stating the resident could not access them.
The facility was cited for repeated deficiencies in drug and biological storage, tube feeding management, and QAPI-QAA improvement activities during both a recertification and a complaint survey. These deficiencies suggest systemic issues in the facility's processes, potentially affecting all residents.
The facility failed to implement infection prevention and control precautions during tracheostomy care for residents. Staff did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions, such as wearing gowns and masks, while providing care to residents with tracheostomies. Additionally, shared medical equipment was not properly cleaned, and staff acknowledged not adhering to the facility's infection control policies.
The facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition, with brown stains observed on the convection oven and stove cooktop. Despite policies requiring daily cleaning, the Dietary Supervisor confirmed the stains, indicating a discrepancy in cleaning practices. This deficiency potentially affects 189 residents who eat orally.
The facility failed to ensure a convection oven and stove were clean and in good repair, potentially affecting 189 residents. Observations revealed brown stains on the oven and stove, despite policies requiring regular cleaning. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed the presence of stains, indicating a lapse in adherence to cleaning procedures.
A resident's food preferences were not honored, despite being cognitively intact and having communicated her dislikes to the dietary staff. The resident, on a NCS/NAS diet, repeatedly received meals with chicken and fish, contrary to her preferences for rice and beans. The facility's failure to adhere to its care plan and policies on resident rights led to dissatisfaction and a violation of the resident's right to self-determination.
A facility failed to implement a care plan for a resident with End Stage Renal Disease by not completing a required dialysis communication form. Despite a verbal report being given, the absence of the form was noted during the resident's dialysis session. Staff interviews revealed confusion over responsibility for the form, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the procedure was not followed.
The facility failed to follow protocols for enteral feeding for four residents, as observed in incorrect dating and missing start times on feeding equipment. These residents, who are dependent on tube feeding due to various medical conditions, were not managed according to the facility's policies, potentially impacting their nutritional status.
The facility failed to properly store and label medications in three out of four sampled medication carts. An expired eye drop was found on one cart, a refrigerated medication was left unrefrigerated on another, and a narcotic sheet with a different prescription number was used for reconciliation on a third cart. Staff acknowledged the errors, and the DON emphasized the importance of following labeling instructions and ensuring proper storage.
The facility failed to implement effective corrective actions for repeated deficiencies in developing comprehensive care plans, labeling/storing drugs, and food sanitation. These issues, identified during a recertification survey, have the potential to affect all 217 residents. Despite having a QAPI program, the facility did not demonstrate successful resolution of these deficiencies.
The facility failed to maintain the laundry room in a sanitary condition, with soiled washing machines, disrepair in the utility room, and wasp nests on the ceiling. Additionally, a Biohazard room door was left open, allowing unauthorized access, contrary to the facility's infection control policy.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a sacral pressure ulcer had a wound care consult ordered, but the facility failed to document follow-up care. Despite an LPN evaluating the resident, no documentation was made because no skin opening was observed, leading to a deficiency in medical record accuracy.
Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Lapse in Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses, including unspecified dementia and acute respiratory failure, was able to leave the facility undetected. The resident required assistance with all activities of daily living and was incontinent of bladder. On the day of the incident, the resident was last seen in his room after receiving a shower in the morning. Staff noted his absence when his lunch tray was delivered and he was not present in his room. Upon realizing the resident was missing, staff initiated a search of the facility and its grounds, and a code for a missing resident was called. Law enforcement, the resident's guardian, and the medical doctor were notified. The resident was eventually found by law enforcement approximately 5.2 miles away from the facility after boarding a city bus and being missing for about eight hours. The area where the resident was found was described as a high-traffic location with cross streets, increasing the risk of harm due to the resident's vulnerability and cognitive impairment. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility had a high volume of visitors on the day of the incident, and it was suggested that the resident may have followed a visitor out of the building. At the time, the resident did not have a wander alert system bracelet in place, and staff were unaware of his exit until the lunch tray was delivered. The facility's protocols for monitoring and supervising residents at risk for elopement were not effectively implemented, resulting in the resident's undetected departure.
Removal Plan
- Nurses completed a head count using the facility's census to ensure no other residents were missing, verified by the nursing supervisor.
- Resident was reevaluated by the psychiatrist and new orders were received.
- Reeducation regarding the prevention of elopement was initiated for the staff by the Director of Nurses (DON).
- All nursing staff on all shifts received education regarding residents who exhibit exit-seeking behavior, the risk of elopement, and the need for adequate supervision to ensure resident safety.
- Unit Managers, supervisors, and/or designee(s) and/or MDS Coordinator(s) re-evaluated residents at risk for elopement by completing a new elopement risk screening form.
- MDS Coordinator and/or designee reviewed and updated the care plans of the residents at risk for elopement to reflect the current elopement risk.
- Nursing staff on all shifts received education on wandering, elopement, and resident safety from the DON or designee(s).
- A Root Cause analysis was completed using the Five Whys to develop new approaches to prevent reoccurrence.
- Facility conducted an AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting to review the Performance Improvement Plan ensuring proper interventions are put in place.
- The facility conducted an elopement drill on every shift.
- Staff were re-educated on the Elopement and wandering, exit seeking resident policy.
- DON, ADON, and designee completed elopement risk screening on active residents and reviewed their plan of care to ensure appropriate interventions are in place, and the plan of care was updated.
- Facility wide audit of the elopement screenings identified new residents that triggered for elopement risk.
- Residents triggered for at risk for elopement have orders for a wander alert system to be put in place.
- Orders were obtained from the physician for psych reevaluation for residents triggered for elopement risk.
- The elopement book was updated with new pictures of residents triggered for elopement risk.
- Elevator keypads installed on the elevators by the Elevator Company.
- A keypad/alarm installed at the door leading to the lobby by the alarm company.
- Elopement drills are done on every shift.
- The Maintenance Director or designee to conduct Safety rounds Log to check exit door, screamer alarms and outside gates.
- Residents with new behaviors of exit seeking and wandering will be added to the elopement risk book that is kept at the nursing station and is accessible to all staff. The behaviors will be added to the resident's care plan and the Kardex.
- Nursing staff will communicate during the shift to shift report any resident who exhibits behaviors to leave the facility, and the safety measures put into place.
- The nurses and nursing supervisors will use the facility census to conduct the headcount of the residents in their respective unit during shift change and they will sign the census to validate that the count is correct, and all residents are accounted for.
- The CNAs will conduct rounds every two hours to ensure the residents are safe and accounted for. CNAs will report to the nurse immediately if unable to locate a resident. Facility protocols for missing residents will be used immediately to locate the residents.
- New admissions elopement evaluations will be reviewed during clinical meetings to ensure elopement interventions are in place for residents that are at risk and the facility guidelines are followed. Nursing Supervisors will review the new admissions elopement evaluation for compliance.
- The DON or designee will audit new admissions for elopement risk and ensure appropriate interventions are in place.
- Residents with new behaviors of wandering, exit seeking will be reassessed by the ADON, Unit Managers, Supervisors or designee for a risk for elopement.
- The DON, Administrator, ADON and/or designee will enforce disciplinary action for facility staff who fail to follow the elopement policy and procedures.
- New hires will receive education on wandering, elopement, and resident safety by the DON, ADON or designee(s).
- Education Target goal is 100%.
- DON and ADON reeducated employees on the facility's policy & procedures as it is related to elopement and residents' safety.
- Staff members participated in the elopement drills.
- Facility compliance with elopement drills was tracked and increased.
- All elopement elements put into place were verified and the facility is in compliance.
- After the facility wide audit of the elopement screening, the facility identified new residents who triggered for elopement.
- A QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) review for follow-up was done and all elements were verified.
- The facility will conduct an elopement drill.
- The DON, ADON, and administrator will review the clinical record of any residents with behaviors of exit seeking and wandering to ensure the facility policy and procedures are implemented and followed, and residents have remained safe at the facility.
- Review the findings during the QAPI meeting.
- The DON, ADON/designee will conduct a quality review of residents on each unit.
- The findings of these reviews will be reported in the next Risk Management/QA Committee meeting until the committee determines substantial compliance has been met and recommends quarterly monitoring by the Regional Director of Clinical Services when completing their quality systems review.
- The committee reviewed the plan and determined the removal plan has been implemented effectively.
Failure to Prevent Elopement of Resident with Severe Cognitive Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure effective systems were in place to provide adequate supervision for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. On the day of the incident, the resident, who had a diagnosis of unspecified dementia and required assistance with all activities of daily living, was found to be missing when a CNA noticed his lunch tray was untouched and he was not in his room. The nurse was alerted, and a search of the facility and grounds was initiated. Despite these efforts, the resident had already left the facility undetected. The resident was able to exit the building, reportedly during a time when there were many visitors entering and leaving, possibly by following a visitor out. The facility's entry and exit procedures at the time required guests to sign in and out, but there was no mention of a system in place to prevent residents from leaving alongside visitors. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not exhibiting exit-seeking behaviors prior to the incident, and it was not immediately clear how he managed to leave the premises. The absence of effective monitoring and security measures allowed the resident to leave unnoticed. The resident was missing for approximately eight hours before being located by law enforcement over five miles away from the facility. During this period, staff followed internal protocols for missing residents, including notifying law enforcement, the resident's guardian, and conducting searches of the facility and surrounding areas. The incident exposed a failure in the facility's supervision and security systems, particularly for residents at risk of elopement due to cognitive impairment.
Removal Plan
- Nurses completed a head count using the facility's census to ensure no other residents were missing, verified by the nursing supervisor.
- Resident was reevaluated by the psychiatrist and new orders were received.
- Reeducation regarding the prevention of elopement was initiated for the staff by the Director of Nurses (DON).
- All nursing staff on all shifts received education regarding residents who exhibit exit-seeking behavior, the risk of elopement, and the need for adequate supervision to ensure resident safety.
- Unit Managers, supervisors, and/or designee(s) and/or MDS Coordinator(s) re-evaluated residents at risk for elopement by completing a new elopement risk screening form.
- MDS Coordinator and/or designee reviewed and updated the care plans of the residents at risk for elopement to reflect the current elopement risk.
- Nursing staff on all shifts received education on wandering, elopement, and resident safety from the DON or designee(s).
- A Root Cause analysis was completed using the Five Whys to develop new approaches to prevent reoccurrence.
- The Facility conducted an AdHoc Quality Assurance Meeting to review the Performance Improvement Plan ensuring proper interventions are put in place.
- The facility conducted an elopement drill on every shift.
- Staff were re-educated on the Elopement and wandering, residents' exit seeking policy.
- The DON, ADON, and designee completed elopement risk screening on active residents and reviewed their plan of care to ensure appropriate interventions are in place, and the plan of care was updated.
- Facility wide audit of the elopement screenings identified new residents that triggered for elopement risk.
- Residents triggered for at risk for elopement have orders for a wander alert system to be put in place.
- Orders were obtained from the physician for psych reevaluation for residents triggered for elopement risk.
- The elopement book was updated with new pictures of residents triggered for elopement risk.
- Elevator keypads installed on the elevators by the Elevator Company.
- A keypad/alarm installed at the door leading to the lobby by the alarm company.
- Elopement drills are done on every shift.
- The Maintenance Director or designee to conduct Safety rounds Log to check exit door, screamer alarms and outside gates.
- Residents with new behaviors of exit seeking and wandering will be added to the elopement risk book that is kept at the nursing station and is accessible to all staff. The behaviors will be added to the resident's care plan and the Kardex.
- Nursing staff will communicate during the shift to shift report any resident who exhibits behaviors to leave the facility, and the safety measures put into place.
- The nurses and nursing supervisors will use the facility census to conduct the headcount of the residents in their respective unit during shift change and they will sign the census to validate that the count is correct, and all residents are accounted for.
- The CNAs will conduct rounds every two hours to ensure the residents are safe and accounted for. CNAs will report to the nurse immediately if unable to locate a resident. Facility protocols for missing residents will be used immediately to locate the residents.
- New admissions elopement evaluations will be reviewed during clinical meetings to ensure elopement interventions are in place for residents that are at risk and the facility guidelines are followed. Nursing Supervisors will review the new admissions elopement evaluation for compliance.
- The DON or designee will audit new admissions for elopement risk and ensure appropriate interventions are in place.
- Residents with new behaviors of wandering, exit seeking will be reassessed by the ADON, Unit Managers, Supervisors or designee for a risk for elopement.
- The DON, Administrator, ADON and/or designee will enforce disciplinary action for facility staff who fail to follow the elopement policy and procedures.
- New hires will receive education on wandering, elopement, and resident safety by the DON, ADON or designee(s).
- The DON and ADON reeducated employees on the facility's policy & procedures as it is related to elopement and residents' safety.
- Elopement drills were conducted with staff participation tracked and compliance rates monitored, with ongoing drills for staff who have not yet participated.
- All elopement elements put into place were verified and the facility is 100% compliance.
- After the facility wide audit of the elopement screening, the facility identified new residents who triggered for elopement.
- A QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) review for follow-up was done, all the elements were verified, and facility was 100% compliance.
- The facility will conduct an elopement drill.
- The DON, ADON, and administrator will review the clinical record of any residents with behaviors of exit seeking and wandering to ensure the facility policy and procedures are implemented and followed, and residents have remained safe at the facility.
- Review the findings during the QAPI meeting.
- The DON, ADON/designee will conduct a quality review of residents on each unit.
- The findings of these reviews will be reported in the next Risk Management/QA Committee meeting until the committee determines substantial compliance has been met and recommends quarterly monitoring by the Regional Director of Clinical Services when completing their quality systems review.
Failure to Provide Timely Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility's staff failed to address respiratory emergencies in a timely manner for two residents, leading to a deficiency in providing safe and appropriate respiratory care. Resident #6 was observed in respiratory distress, with loud gurgling sounds, coughing, and drooling. Despite these signs, the attending nurse, Staff A, RN, did not perform necessary assessments such as auscultating lung sounds or checking vital signs before administering medication and suctioning. Additionally, the drainage collection bag for the resident's tracheostomy was missing, and Staff B, RN, failed to check the oxygen level or clean the suction machine before use. Resident #5 also experienced a delay in receiving appropriate respiratory care. Staff F, LPN, left the resident's room after administering medication without addressing the resident's respiratory distress, characterized by facial grimacing and gurgling sounds. It took twelve minutes for Staff F, LPN, to return with another nurse, Staff E, RN, to perform suctioning. During this time, the resident's feeding was not stopped, and the head of the bed was not elevated, contrary to the care plan's aspiration precautions. The facility's failure to adhere to established protocols for respiratory care, including timely suctioning and proper assessment of residents in distress, was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing and other staff members. The report highlights the lack of immediacy and proper procedure in handling respiratory emergencies, which is critical for residents with conditions such as chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy status.
Failure to Notify Family and Physician of Change in Resident's Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility's staff failed to notify a resident's family and physician of a change in condition, which was identified during a survey. The resident, who was at high risk for aspiration, was observed vomiting and displaying signs of respiratory distress. Despite these symptoms, the facility staff did not notify the physician and the family of the changes in her condition. The resident was observed with audible gurgling breathing sounds, vomit draining from her mouth, and a PEG feeding formula infusing at 65 ml/hr. Staff A, a registered nurse, did not perform an assessment or implement any interventions when initially alerted to the situation. Further observations revealed that the resident continued to exhibit gurgling sounds and vomit drainage, and a Scopolamine patch was noted behind her ear. Staff C, a certified nursing assistant, cleaned the vomit but did not ensure that the nurse was informed of the resident's condition. When Staff A, RN, was questioned about the interventions, he mentioned administering Ondansetron but did not perform a thorough assessment, such as checking vital signs or auscultating lung sounds. Staff B, RN Supervisor, also failed to perform a comprehensive assessment upon entering the room. A review of the resident's clinical records showed no documentation indicating that the resident's family and doctor were notified of the change in condition. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the resident's condition. The facility's policy on changes in condition requires notifying the physician and family, which was not adhered to in this case. The 24-hour log also lacked documentation related to the resident's change in condition, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's adherence to its policies and procedures.
Failure to Prevent Aspiration and Secure PEG Tubes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement measures to prevent aspiration and dislodgement of PEG tubes for residents at risk. One resident was observed with vomit draining from her mouth, and the registered nurses did not implement timely interventions. Despite the presence of gurgling sounds and vomit, the nurse did not check vital signs, bowel sounds, or lung sounds, nor did they hold the PEG feeding. The resident had a history of COPD, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and seizures, which increased her risk for aspiration. Additionally, the facility did not secure PEG tubes for two other residents, increasing the risk of dislodgement. One resident's PEG tube was observed resting above his hand, and he guarded the site, indicating discomfort or potential dislodgement. Another resident's feeding line was wrapped around a privacy curtain and a metal pole, posing a risk for dislodgement. Both residents had clinical diagnoses that included seizures and dysphagia, further complicating their care needs. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding and implementation of necessary interventions to secure PEG tubes. The Director of Nursing confirmed that no special anchoring or adhesive was used to secure the tubes, and staff members expressed that they did not believe securing the tubes was necessary. This lack of appropriate measures and understanding contributed to the deficiencies observed in the care of residents with PEG tubes.
Medication Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to secure medications and ensure a resident received the full dosage of their medications during a medication administration observation. A Registered Nurse (RN), identified as Staff A, was observed administering medications to a resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube. The RN left the resident's medications unattended on the overbed table and walked out of the room. Upon returning, the RN attempted to discard the medication cups and extra water, but the surveyor intervened and found that approximately 75% of the Tylenol and Eliquis were still in the cups. The resident involved had a clinical history that included a tracheostomy status and was prescribed medications such as Levetiracetam, Eliquis, and Tylenol to be administered via PEG tube. During an interview, Staff A acknowledged leaving the medications unattended, justifying the action by stating that the resident was not able to access the medications. This incident highlights a failure in medication administration procedures, specifically in ensuring that medications are not left unattended and that residents receive the full dosage of their prescribed medications.
Repeated Deficiencies in Drug Storage, Tube Feeding, and QAPI Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement effective plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies in the areas of drug and biological storage, tube feeding management, and QAPI-QAA improvement activities. These deficiencies were observed during both a recertification survey and a subsequent complaint survey. The repeated nature of these deficiencies suggests a systemic issue within the facility's processes, as the same areas were cited in both surveys. The facility's policy and procedures indicate a commitment to a comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program, yet the repeated citations suggest that the facility did not effectively follow through with these plans. The deficiencies have the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, indicating a widespread impact on the quality of care and life for the residents.
Failure to Implement Infection Control Precautions During Tracheostomy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement infection prevention and control precautions during tracheostomy care for residents with tracheostomies. On January 22, 2025, a resident was observed in bed with gurgling sounds and vomit draining from the mouth while receiving tube feeding. A registered nurse supervisor entered the room, performed hand hygiene, and wore gloves but did not don a gown as required by Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The nurse checked the resident's mouth, removed gloves, and exited the room without following proper infection control protocols. On January 23, 2025, another resident was observed in distress with loud gurgling sounds, coughing, and drooling. The resident was receiving oxygen via tracheostomy and tube feeding. A nurse and a supervisor entered the room to assist the resident, but the supervisor was not wearing a mask and spoke closely to the resident. Additionally, the supervisor did not clean his stethoscope after use, and neither staff member wore a gown while checking the resident's PEG tube. Both staff members acknowledged not following the facility's infection prevention and control policy and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions.
Sanitation Deficiency in Kitchen Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was prepared under sanitary conditions, as evidenced by the lack of cleanliness in the kitchen equipment. During an initial kitchen tour, surveyors observed brown stains on various parts of the convection oven, including the outside, inside, and doors, as well as on the stove cooktop and the sides of the oven. These observations were made despite the facility's policy, which mandates that all equipment used in food handling be cleaned and sanitized to prevent contamination. The facility's cleaning policies for ovens and ranges/griddles require that spills and food particles be removed after each use and that the equipment be cleaned daily. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed the presence of the brown stains and stated that the oven undergoes a deep clean once a week and is cleaned daily. However, the cleaning logs for August 2024 indicated that the ovens and convection ovens were cleaned daily, suggesting a discrepancy between the cleaning practices and the observed condition of the equipment. This deficiency has the potential to affect 189 out of 217 residents who consume food orally at the facility.
Failure to Maintain Cleanliness of Kitchen Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a convection oven and stove in good repair and cleanliness, which could potentially affect 189 out of 217 residents who consume food orally. During an initial kitchen tour, surveyors observed brown stains on various parts of the convection oven and stove, including the outside, inside, and doors of the oven, as well as the stove cooktop. These observations were made in the presence of the Dietary Supervisor, who confirmed the presence of the stains. The facility's policies on food safety and equipment cleaning require that all food handling equipment be cleaned and sanitized to prevent contamination. The policies specify that ovens should be cleaned as needed and according to a cleaning schedule, with spills and food particles removed after each use. Despite these policies, the cleaning logs for August 2024 indicated that the ovens were cleaned daily, yet the observed stains suggest a failure to adhere to the cleaning procedures outlined in the facility's policies.
Failure to Honor Resident's Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate a resident's food preferences, violating the resident's right to self-determination and choice. Resident number 63, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, expressed dissatisfaction with the meals provided, specifically noting a preference against chicken and fish, and a desire for rice and beans instead of mashed potatoes. Despite having communicated these preferences to the dietitian and dietary staff, the resident continued to receive meals that did not align with her stated preferences, as observed during a survey on 8/19/24. The resident's care plan, which included honoring food preferences and substituting for dislikes, was not adhered to, as evidenced by the repeated provision of unwanted meals. The resident's dietary needs were documented as a No Concentrated Sweets (NCS), No Added Salt (NAS) diet with regular texture and thin consistency liquids, and her food preferences were updated multiple times in the facility's records. However, these updates were not reflected in the meals served to her, leading to dissatisfaction and a failure to respect her autonomy and choices. Interviews with the Registered Dietitian and a staff member eligible to be a dietitian confirmed the oversight in honoring the resident's food preferences. The staff acknowledged the resident's right to have her preferences respected and noted that the dietary department was informed of these preferences, yet the issue persisted until the surveyor's intervention. This deficiency highlights a lapse in the facility's adherence to its policies on resident rights and care planning, specifically regarding the accommodation of personal and cultural preferences in meal planning.
Failure to Implement Dialysis Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement the care plan for a resident undergoing dialysis, as evidenced by the absence of a completed communication form by the nursing staff prior to the resident's dialysis session. On the specified date, the resident was observed in the dialysis room, and it was noted that the floor nurse had not filled out the required dialysis communication form, although a verbal report was given to the Dialysis Patient Care Technician. The resident, who has a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease and is dependent on renal dialysis, had a care plan in place that required coordination with the dialysis center, including communication regarding medication, diet, and lab results. The care plan for the resident, which was initiated and revised on specific dates, included interventions to prevent complications related to hemodialysis. However, the review of the resident's progress notes revealed no documentation prior to the dialysis session on the specified date. Interviews with staff members indicated a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the completion of the communication form, with one nurse stating that the form was usually filled out by another nurse, and the supervisor indicating that no report was given to the dialysis staff as there was nothing to report. The Director of Nursing confirmed the procedure for assessing residents before dialysis and completing the communication form, which was not followed in this instance.
Deficiencies in Enteral Feeding Protocols
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its protocols and procedures for enteral feeding for four residents, as observed during a survey. The deficiencies were noted in the incorrect dating and missing start times on enteral supplements, water bag flushes, and enteral feeding syringes. These discrepancies were observed in the cases of four residents who were receiving tube feedings, indicating a systemic issue in the facility's management of enteral nutrition. Resident #37 was observed with an enteral feeding supplement dated incorrectly and lacking a start time. The resident, who is cognitively impaired and dependent on care, had specific physician orders for enteral feeding and water flushes that were not followed accurately. Similarly, Resident #89, who is dependent on enteral feeding due to multiple medical conditions, was found with an enteral feeding syringe dated incorrectly. This resident also experienced weight loss, which could be related to the improper management of their nutritional needs. Resident #157 and Resident #194 also exhibited similar issues with incorrect dating and missing start times on their enteral feeding equipment. Both residents have significant medical conditions requiring precise nutritional management, and the facility's failure to follow its own protocols could potentially impact their health. The facility's policy mandates accurate administration and documentation of enteral nutrition, which was not adhered to, as confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store and label medications in three out of four sampled medication carts, leading to deficiencies in medication management. On the first-floor south front medication cart, an expired eye drop labeled Cosopt was found with an opened date but no expiration date written on it. The medication was supposed to expire 15 days after opening, but it was not discarded as required. Staff D, an LPN, acknowledged the oversight, stating that expired medications should be reordered and discarded to prevent harm to residents. On the second-floor south back medication cart, a box of sublingual Lorazepam meant for refrigeration was found unrefrigerated. Staff B, an RN, admitted to seeing the medication but failing to place it in the refrigerator. Additionally, on the first-floor north back medication cart, a narcotic sheet with a different prescription number was used to reconcile an Oxycodone bingo card, although the count was correct. Staff E, an LPN, was unaware of how the error occurred. The Director of Nursing emphasized the importance of following labeling instructions and ensuring proper storage and reconciliation of medications.
Repeated Deficiencies in Care Plan, Drug Storage, and Food Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to effectively implement corrective actions to address repeated deficiencies in three key areas: F 656 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, F 761 Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals, and F 812 Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary. These deficiencies were identified during a recertification survey with an exit date of April 20, 2023, and have the potential to impact all 217 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The facility's survey history indicates that these issues have been persistent, suggesting that previous corrective measures were not successful in resolving the underlying problems. The facility's policy and procedures emphasize the development and maintenance of a comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. However, the facility did not demonstrate that effective plans of action were implemented to correct the identified deficiencies. The facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee is responsible for monitoring performance improvement activities, but the repeated citations indicate a lack of effective oversight and follow-through in addressing these critical areas of care and service delivery.
Deficiencies in Laundry Room Maintenance and Biohazard Room Security
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the laundry room in a safe and sanitary condition. During an observational tour, it was noted that the washing machines were soiled with rust-like stains and dust, and the floors in the soiled utility room were in disrepair. Additionally, wasp nests were observed on the ceiling, and the exhaust fans were rusted and in disrepair. Despite these conditions, the cleaning schedule document indicated that staff had signed off daily to confirm the machines were cleaned. The Housekeeping Director and Maintenance Staff acknowledged these findings, but the Maintenance Director did not comment on the issues. The facility also failed to follow safety and infection control protocols for one of its Biohazard rooms. An observation revealed that the door to the first floor North nursing station Biohazard room was open, allowing unauthorized access. A Floor tech entered the room without a code, stating that the door should be kept locked with a code. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the Biohazard room doors are supposed to be locked to ensure resident safety. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy requires that any breach in infection prevention and control practices be reported to the Director of Nursing.
Incomplete Medical Records for Wound Care Consult
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurate for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for toileting and transfer, was admitted with a pressure ulcer in the sacral region. A wound care consult was ordered after a nurse identified a reopened area on the sacral region, but there was no follow-up documentation in the medical records regarding the wound care consult or evaluation by the wound care nurse. Despite the order for a wound care consult, there was no documentation of an evaluation by the wound care nurse after the wound was identified. The LPN involved stated that they did not remember why there was no documentation, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the LPN evaluated the resident but did not document the findings because no opening of the skin was observed at the time. This lack of documentation led to the deficiency noted in the survey.
Latest citations in Florida
Surveyors found that the facility’s only commercial cooking hood was not maintained in accordance with NFPA 101 and NFPA 96 requirements. During a kitchen tour with the Maintenance Director, the hood was observed to be not grease tight due to missing fire-resistant caulk, and the Maintenance Director acknowledged this condition at the time of the survey.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to comply with NFPA 99, NFPA 70, and NFPA 1 requirements for electrical equipment when, during a tour with the Maintenance Director, a power strip in the electrical room was observed being used as a permanent power source instead of a dedicated receptacle. The report states that this improper use of a relocatable power tap could lead to electrical hazards for residents and staff, and notes that extension cords and power strips are not to be used as substitutes for fixed wiring under the cited codes.
Surveyors found that the facility did not have documentation showing completion of the required annual 90‑minute test of emergency lighting. During record review and interview, the Director of Facilities confirmed that records of this annual test, required under NFPA 101 sections 19.2.9.1 and 7.9, were not available. This deficiency was cited as affecting all occupants in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to perform and/or document the required annual Duct Detector Differential testing for the fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 101, NFPA 70, and NFPA 72. During record review and interviews with the Director of Facilities, no documentation could be produced to show that this annual testing had been completed, and the Director acknowledged the lack of records. This deficiency was cited as potentially affecting all occupants in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to perform and/or document required annual testing and exercising of main and feeder circuit breakers in accordance with NFPA 99 and manufacturer recommendations. During record review, no documentation could be produced to show that the annual breaker exercises had been completed, and the Director of Facilities acknowledged this lack of records. This deficiency relates to the essential electrical system that supports life safety and critical branches during emergencies.
Surveyors observed that an adapter was used to power a refrigerator in the kitchen and a refrigerator in the dining room manager's office was plugged into a power strip. The Director of Facilities confirmed both uses, which did not comply with NFPA 99 and NFPA 70 requirements prohibiting adapters and power strips from being used as substitutes for permanent wiring.
Surveyors found that food service operations failed to meet professional food safety standards in both the main and satellite kitchens. In the main kitchen, a cook’s facial hair was not fully covered, the handwashing sink did not initially provide warm water, wet-nested pans and dirty plate domes were stored for use, ice buckets were stained with mold-like discoloration, and the high-temp dishwasher failed to reach the required sanitizing temperature. In the satellite pantry, the dishwasher did not reach required wash temperatures, vents and cabinets above serving dishes had mold-like buildup and residue, floors were damaged and soiled, the dishwasher chemical cabinet was rusted, the AC filter was heavily soiled, the juice dispenser had debris near clean cups, and tray carts contained dirty sheet trays. During tray line observation, salad items were held above 41°F, and a pureed vegetable listed on the menu extension was not available on the line.
Two residents on physician-ordered modified diets (pureed and mechanical soft with nectar-thick liquids) were given Regular Menus listing items such as fresh fruit, salad greens, and grilled cheese that were not compatible with their diet orders. Both residents selected items from these Regular Menus, but the facility either could not provide the chosen foods due to diet restrictions or substituted different items (e.g., canned peach halves instead of fresh fruit), despite the residents’ expressed preferences. The RD and dietetic technician confirmed that Regular Menus were routinely provided to all residents, including those on mechanically altered diets, leading to menu choices that did not align with ordered diet consistencies.
Surveyors found that the facility did not follow physician-ordered therapeutic diets or provide prescribed Magic Cup nutritional supplements for several cognitively impaired residents. A resident on a pureed diet with honey-thick liquids was served a lunch without the ordered pureed vegetable, and tray line review on another day showed no pureed vegetables available despite the menu specifying them. Multiple residents with orders for Magic Cup supplements had these listed on their meal tickets but were instead served other desserts or received no supplement at all, while documentation on the MAR indicated full consumption. Dietary staff acknowledged responsibility for providing Magic Cups but could not explain why residents in the dining room did not receive them.
A resident with intact cognition and multiple cardiac and pulmonary diagnoses had clearly documented DNR orders, including signed advance directive forms and care plan entries confirming her wish to avoid resuscitation. During a cardiac emergency, a CNA found the resident unresponsive and notified an RN, who initiated a code blue response. Several RNs and LPNs transferred the resident to bed and began CPR without first verifying code status, despite one LPN asking and then leaving the room to check the record. Staff interviews and video review showed that chest compressions and use of a bag-valve mask continued for about 12 minutes until EMS arrived, even after staff learned the resident was DNR, and the physician confirmed the resident was already listed as DNR in the system, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy finding for failure to honor advance directives.
Commercial Cooking Hood Not Maintained Grease Tight per NFPA Standards
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency involving the facility’s commercial cooking facilities. During a tour of the kitchen between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. with the Maintenance Director, surveyors observed that the one commercial cooking hood in use was not grease tight. Specifically, the hood was missing required fire-resistant caulk, which is necessary for maintaining a grease-tight seal in accordance with NFPA 96 and NFPA 101 standards. The Maintenance Director acknowledged these findings at the time of observation. The deficiency was cited under NFPA 101 and NFPA 96 requirements for commercial cooking operations, which mandate that cooking equipment and associated hoods be protected and maintained in compliance with these fire and life safety codes.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth on the statement of deficiencies. This plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because required. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Commercial cooking hood system inspected; no additional deficient areas were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes will you make to ensure that the practice does not recur:Maintenance staff and Dietary staff education on proper use and reporting of issues related to cooking hood system.Verification of scheduled inspections and cleaning of cooking hood system by licensed vendor.How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place:The maintenance director/designee will complete weekly audits of cooking hood system for 4 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure compliance. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance. Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth on the statement of deficiencies. This plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because required. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Commercial cooking hood system inspected; no additional deficient areas were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes will you make to ensure that the practice does not recur; Maintenance staff and Dietary staff education on proper use and reporting of issues related to cooking hood system. Verification of scheduled inspections and cleaning of cooking hood system by licensed vendor. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place; The maintenance director/designee will complete weekly audits of cooking hood system for 4 weeks, then monthly for 2 months to ensure compliance. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance.
Improper Use of Power Strip as Permanent Power Source in Electrical Room
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to improper use of relocatable power taps (RPTs) and power strips in violation of NFPA 99, NFPA 70, and NFPA 1 requirements. During a facility tour conducted between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. with the Maintenance Director, surveyors observed one power strip in the electrical room being used as a source of permanent power instead of being connected to a dedicated receptacle. The report notes that this use did not comply with standards that require extension cords and power strips not be used as a substitute for fixed wiring and that they be used only under specified conditions. The deficiency specifically concerns the facility’s failure to ensure that RPTs are maintained and used in accordance with NFPA 99 (2012 Edition) sections 10.2.3.6 and 10.2.4, and NFPA 70 (2011 and 2020 Editions) provisions governing flexible cords and temporary wiring, as well as NFPA 1 (2021 Edition) sections 11.1.2.2, 11.1.4.1, and 1.4.1. The report states that this condition could lead to electric hazards for residents and staff. No individual resident cases, medical histories, or specific clinical conditions are described in connection with this deficiency.
Plan Of Correction
What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Facility wide audit of electrical rooms was conducted to identify improper use of power strips. No additional concerns were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur; The facility completed education reinforcing compliance with electrical safety requirements in accordance with National Fire Protection Association. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place: The maintenance director/designee will complete random electrical safety audits 2 times per week for 4 weeks, then monthly to ensure compliance with electrical safety standards. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice? No residents were affected by this deficient practice. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective actions will be taken; Facility wide audit of electrical rooms was conducted to identify improper use of power strips. No additional concerns were identified. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur; The facility completed education reinforcing compliance with electrical safety requirements in accordance with National Fire Protection Association. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put in place; The maintenance director/designee will complete random electrical safety audits 2 times per week for 4 weeks, then monthly to ensure compliance with electrical safety standards. The findings will be reported to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee for ongoing compliance.
Failure to Document Required Annual 90‑Minute Emergency Lighting Test
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to emergency lighting when, during record review and staff interview between 11:30 AM and 3:00 PM with the Director of Facilities, the facility was unable to provide documentation that the required annual 90‑minute testing of emergency lighting had been performed. The Director of Facilities acknowledged that there was no documentation available to show completion of this annual 90‑minute emergency lighting test, as required by NFPA 101 (2012 and 2021 editions), sections 19.2.9.1 and 7.9. This failure to document the annual emergency lighting test was cited as a noncompliance that could affect all occupants of the facility in the event of a fire or other emergency. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were mentioned in the report; the deficiency pertains to facility-wide life safety systems and their required testing and documentation.
Plan Of Correction
Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Emergency Lighting K0291 The facility immediately conducted a comprehensive inspection of all emergency lighting systems. On The Director of Facilities performed the required 90-minute annual testing of all emergency lighting units. Documentation of testing has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All areas of the facility were considered at risk due to lack of documented annual testing. A full facility-wide audit of all emergency lighting units was completed on by the Director of Facilities to ensure compliance. 3. The facility implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure annual 90-minute emergency lighting testing is completed in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012), Section 7.9. A log tracking system has been developed to document all required testing. The Director of Facilities/designee will receive re-education on Life Safety Code requirements and documentation standards. 4. The Director of Facilities will review fire alarm testing records quarterly for 12 months, will present the findings for 12 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the twelve months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required. Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Emergency Lighting K0291 The facility immediately conducted a comprehensive inspection of all emergency lighting systems. On The Director of Facilities performed the required 90-minute annual testing of all emergency lighting units. Documentation of testing has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All areas of the facility were considered at risk due to lack of documented annual testing. A full facility-wide audit of all emergency lighting units was completed on by the Director of Facilities to ensure compliance. 3. The facility implemented a preventative maintenance schedule to ensure annual 90-minute emergency lighting testing is completed in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012), Section 7.9. A log tracking system has been developed to document all required testing. The Director of Facilities/designee will receive re-education on Life Safety Code requirements and documentation standards. 4. The Director of Facilities will review fire alarm testing records quarterly for 12 months, will present the findings for 12 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the twelve months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required.
Failure to Perform and Document Annual Duct Detector Differential Testing
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the facility’s fire alarm system testing and maintenance, specifically the required annual Duct Detector Differential testing. During record review conducted between 11:30 AM and 3:00 PM, surveyors requested documentation demonstrating that this annual testing had been completed in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012 and 2021 editions), NFPA 70, and NFPA 72. The facility was unable to produce records showing that the Duct Detector Differential testing had been performed as required. In an interview conducted during the same time frame, the Director of Facilities acknowledged that the facility failed to provide documentation of the annual Duct Detector Differential testing. The deficiency was cited under NFPA 101 2012 (19.2.9.1, 7.9) and NFPA 101 2021 (19.2.9.1, 7.9), indicating noncompliance with the standards that require fire alarm detection systems, including duct detectors, to be tested and maintained annually. The report notes that this deficiency could affect all occupants of the facility in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Plan Of Correction
Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance K0345 1. On The facility a certified fire alarm vendor to perform annual duct detector differential testing. All required testing has now been completed and documented. 2. All residents and staff were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A facility-wide review of all fire alarm components was conducted on 3. The facility established a service agreement to ensure all fire alarm testing (including duct detectors) is completed annually per NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 requirements. A compliance calendar has been implemented with alerts for required inspections and testing. The Director of Facilities/designee has been re-educated on required testing intervals and documentation. 4. The Director of Facilities or designee will audit for 3 months all documentation for the annual testing and inspection of the duct detector pressure differential test. The Director of Facilities will present the findings of site inspections for 3 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance K0345 1. On The facility a certified fire alarm vendor to perform annual duct detector differential testing. All required testing has now been completed and documented. 2. All residents and staff were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A facility-wide review of all fire alarm components was conducted on. 3. The facility established a service agreement to ensure all fire alarm testing (including duct detectors) is completed annually per NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 requirements. A compliance calendar has been implemented with alerts for required inspections and testing. The Director of Facilities/designee has been re-educated on required testing intervals and documentation. 4. The Director of Facilities or designee will audit for 3 months all documentation for the annual testing and inspection of the duct detector pressure differential test. The Director of Facilities will present the findings of site inspections for 3 months at Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required
Failure to Perform and Document Annual Main and Feeder Breaker Testing
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to perform and document required annual maintenance and testing of the main and feeder circuit breakers in accordance with NFPA 99 and manufacturer recommendations. During a record review conducted between 11:30 AM and 3:00 PM, surveyors requested documentation of the annual main and feeder breaker exercise. The facility was unable to provide records demonstrating that this testing and exercising had been completed as required. In interviews conducted during the same time frame, the Director of Facilities acknowledged that the facility did not have documentation showing that the annual main and feeder breaker exercise was performed according to manufacturer recommendations. The report notes that this failure to comply with NFPA 99 (2012 and 2021 editions, Sections 6.4.4 and 6.5.4) could affect all occupants of the facility in the event of a fire or other emergency, and that written records of maintenance and testing are required to be maintained and readily available.
Plan Of Correction
Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing K0918 1. On A licensed electrical contractor performed the annual main and feeder breaker testing/exercising in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. Documentation has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All residents were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A full review of the essential electrical system was conducted on 3. A preventative maintenance program has been implemented to ensure that annual breaker testing is completed per NFPA 99 (2012). The facility has incorporated electrical system testing into its environmental compliance tracking system. The Director of Facilities/designee received re-education on NFPA requirements. 4. The Director of Facilities will audit electrical system maintenance logs quarterly for 12 months. Inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required. Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing K0918 1. On A licensed electrical contractor performed the annual main and feeder breaker testing/exercising in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. Documentation has been completed and is maintained on-site. 2. All residents were considered at risk due to lack of documented testing. A full review of the essential electrical system was conducted on . 3. A preventative maintenance program has been implemented to ensure that annual breaker testing is completed per NFPA 99 (2012). The facility has incorporated electrical system testing into its environmental compliance tracking system. The Director of Facilities/designee received re-education on NFPA requirements. 4. The Director of Facilities will audit electrical system maintenance logs quarterly for 12 months. Inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, , and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required.
Improper Use of Adapters and Power Strips for Refrigerators
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves improper use of electrical adapters and power strips as substitutes for permanent wiring, in violation of NFPA 99 and NFPA 70 requirements. During an observation with the Director of Facilities, surveyors found that an adapter was being used to power a refrigerator in the kitchen. The Director of Facilities acknowledged that an adapter was in use for this refrigerator, contrary to the standards that prohibit adapters from being used in place of fixed wiring. In a separate observation with the Director of Facilities, surveyors identified that a refrigerator in the dining room manager's office was plugged into a power strip. The Director of Facilities acknowledged that a power strip was being used for this refrigerator. These findings showed that the facility was not complying with NFPA 99 provisions that require power strips and adapters not be used as substitutes for permanent wiring for such equipment.
Plan Of Correction
Formatted text (without <text> tags or quotes): Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension K0920 1. On The adapter in the kitchen refrigerator and the power strip in the dining room manager's office were immediately removed. All equipment was plugged directly into approved wall outlets. 2. On A facility-wide inspection was conducted by The Director of Facilities to identify improper use of power strips and adapters. Any non-compliant items were removed immediately. 3. On Staff were educated on proper electrical safety practices, including prohibited use of extension and adapters. Routine environmental rounds now include electrical safety checks. 4. The Director of Facilities/designee will conduct monthly environmental rounds for 3 months, then quarterly thereafter. Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that Continued from page occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required. Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension CFR(s): NFPA 101 Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension K0920 1. On The adapter in the kitchen refrigerator and the power strip in the dining room manager's office were immediately removed. All equipment was plugged directly into approved wall outlets. 2. On A facility-wide inspection was conducted by The Director of Facilities to identify improper use of power strips and adapters. Any non-compliant items were removed immediately. 3. On Staff were educated on proper electrical safety practices, including prohibited use of extension and adapters. Routine environmental rounds now include electrical safety checks. 4. The Director of Facilities/designee will conduct monthly environmental rounds for 3 months, then quarterly thereafter. Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings to confirm inspections have taken place. During and at the conclusion of the three months, the QAPI committee will re-evaluate and initiate necessary action or extend the review period. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and ongoing compliance with the components of the Plan of Correction, and resolving variances that may occur. The Administrator is responsible for confirming the status of this Plan of Correction is reviewed and discussed at QAPI meetings and action initiated if required.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Main and Satellite Kitchens
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple failures to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in both the main kitchen and a satellite pantry kitchen. In the main kitchen, a cook’s beard cover did not fully cover all facial hair, and the handwashing sink initially did not provide warm water until the Executive Director manually adjusted a valve under the sink. In the pot washing area, full-sized steam table pans were stacked while still wet, and more than five plate domes with stuck-on food particles were found piled in the tray line area ready for use, indicating they had not been properly washed. Two large ice buckets were stained with black and grey mold-like discoloration and white wear marks. The high-temperature dishwashing machine in the main kitchen was run three times but failed to reach the required 180°F rinse temperature, only reaching 172°F, meaning dishes were not properly sanitized. In the second-floor satellite pantry kitchen, the high-temperature dishwashing machine was also run three times and failed to meet required wash temperatures, reaching only 139°F instead of the required 150–165°F, so dishes were not properly cleaned and sanitized. Additional sanitation and maintenance issues were observed, including a vent above serving dishes with a mold-like accumulation, broken and soiled cabinets above serving dishes with residue on the handles, and pantry floors with cracked, broken, and missing tiles with debris or residue buildup. The dishwasher chemical cabinet lock was rust-laden, the AC filter was covered with dark grey soot and dust, the juice dispenser with clean cups nearby had debris on top, and tray delivery carts contained large sheet trays with residue and stuck-on food debris. During a tray line observation, chopped tomatoes and sliced avocados on the salad line were held at 44°F and 45°F respectively, above the required 41°F or less, and the menu extension listed pureed peas for a pureed diet, but no pureed vegetable was present on the line.
Plan Of Correction
Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary CFR(s): 483.60(i)(1)(2) §483.60(i) Food safety requirements. Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required F0812 1. All identified sanitation issues were corrected on Hot water valve was fixed immediately by maintenance team Steam table pan wet nesting was corrected The 5 plate domes that were dirty were taken to the dishwasher to be washed Stained ice buckets were replaced with new ones Dishwashing machine not reaching temperature for rinse cycle was fixed by Eco lab the same day Team member was provided education and in-service on proper use of beard guard. Corrected on [R] 2.Identified issues from satellite Kitchen were corrected on [R] Dishwashing machine not reaching temperature for rinse cycle was fixed by Eco lab the same day The vent located above the serving dishes was cleaned by maintenance team The cabinets were cleaned immediately The floors of the pantry area were observed with broken, cracked, missing tiles, with buildup residue and debris. Maintenance director made aware in the process of getting replaced. The locking mechanism of the dishwasher chemical cabinet is rust laden. Laden removed and in the process of being replaced. The AC filter was cleaned by maintenance team Th juice dispenser was cleaned by dietary aide The large delivery trays with residue and food debris were discarded 3. Issues identified during Tray line observation were corrected: The chopped tomatoes and sliced avocados were discarded Pureed vegetable was added to the line. Inservice on serving all food groups, starches, protein and vegetables to residents on texture modified diet order. Inservice provided to all dietary aides Inservice on maintaining and holding temperatures for ready to eat foods. Inservice provided to all cooks and dietary aides Daily sanitation rounds will be conducted by the Certified Dietary manager /designee for one week. Weekly for 2 months. 4. The Certified Dietary Manager/Executive Chef/designee will report the findings of the above observations and audits to the monthly QAPI Committee. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and compliance of this POC and and resolving any variances that may occur.
Failure to Honor Diet-Appropriate Menu Choices for Residents on Modified Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with menu choices that matched their physician-ordered diet textures and liquid consistencies. One resident with severe cognitive impairment had a physician order for a controlled diet with pureed texture and honey-thick liquids. During a noon meal observation, this resident’s meal ticket was stapled to a Regular Menu listing items such as lettuce and tomato salad, stir-fried vegetables, and a grilled cheese sandwich, none of which were appropriate for the resident’s ordered diet. The Registered Dietitian and the Dietetic Technician confirmed that Daily Menu printouts with Regular Menu options were provided to all residents, including those on mechanically altered diets, resulting in residents being offered choices that could not be honored due to diet restrictions. Another resident with moderate cognitive impairment had a physician order for a mechanical soft diet with nectar-thick liquids. This resident’s lunch tray ticket was also stapled to a Regular Menu that included salad greens, which are not allowed on a mechanical soft diet. On a separate breakfast observation, the same resident’s Regular Menu included fresh fruit as a choice, which the resident circled, but the tray contained canned peach halves instead. The resident stated she wanted her chosen fresh fruit rather than the peaches and reiterated her food preferences during the interview. Photographic evidence was obtained to document these discrepancies between ordered diets, menu offerings, and the food actually provided.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is requiredF05501. Resident #54 and Resident #56 were immediately assessed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) & CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) for food preferences on Residents #54 and #56 were offered meal choices consistent with the prescribed diet. No adverse outcomes were identified. 2. 100% audit of all residents with therapeutic diets was completed on [R] by CDM to ensure menus and meal selections consistent with physician-ordered diets.On [R] , CDM provided in-service provided to dietary aides, certified nursing assistants, nurses, managers on new selective menu processes. 3. The facility implemented a diet-specific menu system and pre-meal diet verification process by reviewing the diet in tray ticket program IMPAC and PCC. Copies of the menus to be provided as part of the audits.Diet Menu was revised to include a mechanically altered diet to be consistent with physician orders. Therapeutic diets menus are available and offered to each resident according to physician orders. The Dietary Manager or designee will conduct weekly audits of 4 residents on therapeutic diets x 4 weeks then monthly x 2months, to verify the correct menu is offered and served. 4. The Dietary Manager or designee will report findings at the monthly QAPI meeting. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and compliance with this POC and [R] , and resolving any variances that occur.
Failure to Follow Therapeutic Diet Orders and Provide Prescribed Nutritional Supplements
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow physician-ordered therapeutic diets and prescribed nutritional supplements for multiple residents. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a physician’s order for a controlled diet with pureed texture and honey-thick liquids was observed at lunch without the ordered pureed vegetable; her plate contained only pureed chicken, a pureed starch, and possibly a pureed bread, all covered in gravy. The pureed menu for that meal listed broccoli as the vegetable, and a subsequent tray line observation on another day showed no pureed vegetables available, despite the pureed menu specifying pureed peas. The dietary manager and registered dietitian were informed of the missing pureed vegetables, and photographic evidence was obtained. The facility also failed to provide ordered Magic Cup nutritional supplements as prescribed. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a care plan addressing risk for compromised nutritional status had a physician’s order for a 4 oz Magic Cup on day and evening shifts with lunch and dinner; during a breakfast observation, the meal ticket listed Magic Cup, but none was provided. Another resident with moderate cognitive impairment had a physician’s order for a 4 oz Magic Cup with lunch; during lunch observation, the meal ticket indicated Magic Cup, but the resident was served chocolate ice cream and ate coconut cream pie for dessert instead. The MAR documented 100% consumption of a Magic Cup on two consecutive days, despite the observed failure to provide it. During interviews, the RD and dietary manager explained that Magic Cups were to be provided by dietary staff either on trays or via the dessert/ice cream cart, but they could not explain why residents in the dining room did not receive the ordered supplements. Photographic evidence was obtained of these occurrences.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of this plan does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of correction. This plan of correction is submitted as the facility's credible allegation of compliance and Soley because it is required F0803 1. Upon identification, resident #54 was given pureed vegetables. Residents #23, #39, and #54 were given Magic Cup supplements as ordered. On [R] CDM re-educated team members on supplement delivery including proper documentation and confirming that pureed diet being served matches what is listed on spread sheet. Dietary aides' morning and evening shifts are accountable for serving all food groups including vegetables when serving puree meals to residents. 2. A 100% audit of all residents with therapeutic diets and/or supplements was completed on [R] by Certified Dietary Manager. 3. A tray line checklist and diet/supplement reconciliation process between dietary and nursing were implemented by [R]. RD oversight of menu compliance was initiated. The Certified Dietary Manager or designee will audit food tray weekly x 4 weeks then weekly x 2 months. 4. The Certified Dietary Manager/Designee will report on the findings at the monthly QAPI meeting. The Administrator is responsible for confirming implementation and compliance with this POC and [R], and resolving any variances that may occur.
Failure to Verify and Honor DNR Order Before Initiating CPR
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to honor a resident’s clearly established Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status during a cardiac emergency. The resident had multiple medical diagnoses, including cerebral infarction, COPD, cardiomyopathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, a nonrheumatic mitral valve disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and immunodeficiency. The medical record contained DNR orders created on two separate dates with no end dates, a DNR document signed by the resident and a nurse practitioner, and a 3008 form listing the resident’s advance directive as DNR. The resident’s MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition, and progress notes documented that the difference between DNR/no CPR and full code had been explained over 30 minutes, after which the resident chose DNR and reiterated to social services that she did not want to be resuscitated or undergo chest compressions. On the day of the incident, a CNA assigned to the resident checked on her and found her sitting in a wheelchair and unresponsive despite multiple verbal attempts to rouse her. The CNA notified the RN, who obtained a blood pressure machine, entered the room, then ran out to the nurses’ station, after which a code blue was paged over the intercom. The RN returned with a crash cart, and additional nursing staff, including RNs and LPNs, entered the room. Staff described transferring the unresponsive resident from the wheelchair to the bed and beginning chest compressions. Multiple staff members reported that when one LPN asked about the resident’s code status, no one in the room knew it at that time, and that this LPN left the room to verify the code status while CPR was already in progress. Interviews and video review confirmed that CPR was initiated and continued for approximately 12 minutes before EMS arrived, despite the resident’s existing DNR orders. Several nurses, including those who arrived after CPR had started, acknowledged that they did not check the resident’s code status before assisting with chest compressions or using a bag-valve mask. Staff later reported that the LPN who checked the record returned and announced that the resident was a DNR, yet compressions continued until EMS arrived. The physician stated that the resident was already in the system as a DNR and that staff were expected to check code status before performing CPR. The DON and regional nurse consultant confirmed, based on interviews and camera review, that staff failed to confirm the resident’s code status prior to initiating CPR and that CPR was performed against the resident’s wishes, leading surveyors to determine that this failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.
Removal Plan
- Implemented a revised admission/readmission process requiring an Advance Directive discussion form to be completed by the licensed nurse upon admission or with change in advance directives, with follow-up by Social Services.
- Reviewed Advance Directive discussion forms in the daily clinical meeting with the Interdisciplinary Team.
- Conducted a huddle on units after the clinical meeting to discuss any changes in advance directives/code status.
- Placed signage on each crash cart stating: "Stop check physician order prior to starting Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation."
- Implemented the "It Takes Two" process requiring two licensed nurses to verify code status/advance directives prior to initiation of CPR.
- Initiated an internal investigation including resident record review, staff interviews, and notification to the physician and resident representative.
- Suspended and terminated the assigned nurse and reported the nurse’s license to the licensing board.
- Suspended and terminated an additional nurse who responded and participated in initiation of CPR and reported the nurse’s license to the licensing board.
- Suspended two additional nurses pending investigation and returned them to work with disciplinary action, education on ANE/honoring advance directives, and participation in a code blue drill.
- Conducted a 100% audit of all current residents’ code status and care plans.
- Conducted a 100% audit of crash carts to ensure all required items were present.
- Reviewed CPR cards for identified nurses to confirm validity and inclusion of in-person skills competencies.
- Held an ad hoc QAPI meeting with Administrator, DON, Medical Director, and department heads.
- Completed an audit of residents discharged, transferred to the hospital, or expired to verify advance directives were honored.
- Provided staff education for licensed/certified staff on medical emergency response and communication of advance directives and code status, following physician orders related to advance directives, the "It Takes Two" verification process, and CNA roles during code blue.
- Provided all-staff education on Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation/Resident Rights with focus on honoring advance directives.
- Completed honoring advance directives attestation with licensed nursing staff.
- Completed physician orders education for licensed nursing staff.
- Completed medical emergency response and communication of code status education for licensed nursing staff.
- Completed ANE/Resident Rights education for all staff.
- Completed advance directives posttest for licensed staff.
- Completed ANE/Resident Rights posttest for all staff.
- Completed code blue process/"It Takes Two" education for licensed nursing staff.
- Began code blue drills every shift and required licensed nurses to attend a mock code blue quality assurance drill prior to working.
- Completed CNA roles-in-code-blue training.
- Completed quality reviews validating staff competencies for completed education.
- Completed quality reviews of newly admitted residents to verify completion of the advance directive discussion form.
- Implemented Director of Clinical Services chart review of residents who expire at the facility or are transferred to the hospital after a cardiac event to verify advance directives were followed.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
