Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not comply with state emergency management requirements when the comprehensive emergency management plan (CEMP) expired and was not resubmitted to the county as required. During record review with the Director of Maintenance, the existing CEMP was found to have lapsed, and in an exit interview the Administrator acknowledged that no updated plan had been submitted since the prior plan’s expiration.
Two residents reported consistently receiving cold meals due to delays in tray delivery and a non-functional plate warmer. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the issue, noting that food often became cold due to residents being away from their rooms. Observations revealed that food temperatures were below required levels, and the facility's policy mandates specific cooking temperatures to prevent foodborne illnesses.
The facility failed to notify and invite two residents and their representatives to participate in care plan meetings. Interviews revealed a breakdown in the process of sending invitations, with staff unsure of responsibilities. The facility's policies required resident and family participation, but this was not happening as expected.
The facility failed to maintain food service safety and sanitation standards, with issues such as improper storage of cleaning rags and personal items, uncovered trash receptacles, and chemicals stored near food. Food items were not properly dated or sealed, and personal food was stored inappropriately. The dry storage area had chemicals improperly stored, and the walk-in freezer had significant ice build-up. Kitchen equipment and surfaces were not adequately cleaned, and a cleaning schedule was lacking.
A facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by staff not using appropriate PPE for a resident with MRSA, using non-cleanable materials on bed rails, and having torn linen carts. A CNA did not wear a gown for a resident under contact precautions, and the DON acknowledged inadequate cleaning practices for bed rail padding. Linen carts were in poor condition, with the Environmental Service Supervisor unaware of the issues.
A resident's family member reported a grievance about a therapist's insensitive behavior following the death of the resident's roommate. Despite the report, the grievance was not fully documented or resolved according to the facility's policy, which mandates resolution within five days. The resident had conditions including metabolic encephalopathy and dementia, and the grievance involved psychological support and sensitivity education, but these actions were not completed.
The facility failed to ensure accurate or developed advanced directive care plans for three residents. One resident had a DNR order but was care planned as Full Code, another had no advanced directive care plan despite a Full Code order, and a third had a DNR order but was inaccurately care planned as Full Code. The discrepancies were confirmed by the SSD and DON, highlighting a failure to align care plans with physician orders.
A resident with flaccid hemiplegia due to a stroke did not receive the prescribed splint for her left hand, as confirmed by staff interviews and observations. Despite a physician's order and a care plan intervention to apply the splint, the resident was observed without it, and staff confirmed it was not used. The facility's policy on maintaining range of motion was not followed.
The facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and maintain the dumpster area outside the kitchen. Two dumpsters were found with open lids and soiled walls, surrounded by debris including used incontinent products and plastic waste. The dietary manager acknowledged the issue, stating it was discussed daily but not addressed. The facility's policy requires covered containers and clean storage areas to prevent pest access.
Failure to Annually Update and Submit Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with Florida Statute 408.821 and Florida Administrative Code 59A-4 by not submitting its comprehensive emergency management plan (CEMP) on an annual basis. During record review on 04/21/2026 with the Director of Maintenance, surveyors determined that the CEMP on file had expired on 11/01/2024. No updated or renewed CEMP had been submitted to the appropriate county authority since the expiration of the last approved plan. In an interview conducted during the exit conference, the Administrator acknowledged that the CEMP had expired and confirmed that the facility had not yet submitted an updated plan to the county. The deficiency was cited under Florida Statute 408.821 and 400.23(2)(g), and Florida Administrative Code 59A-4.126(3), as a Class III violation related to emergency management planning requirements.
Failure to Serve Meals at Safe Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that meals were served at appropriate temperatures, resulting in two residents consistently receiving cold meals. Resident #6, who is cognitively intact and has a history of sepsis, muscle weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and heart disease, reported that every meal he received was cold, including a hamburger patty with a bun served the previous night. Similarly, Resident #2, also cognitively intact and diagnosed with a fracture, cognitive communication deficit, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, major depressive disorder, and chronic heart failure, complained that her meals, including hot oatmeal, were always cold. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the issue, noting that food often became cold due to delays in tray delivery and residents being away from their rooms, such as when they went out to smoke. The manager had been conducting food temperature audits since December 2024, and test trays were part of the process. However, during an observation, it was noted that the meal trays were not equipped with insulated plate bases due to a non-functional plate warmer, which had been out of service since October 2024. The Dietary Manager was unsure if the current Nursing Home Administrator was aware of the issue, although the previous administrator had been informed. Further observations revealed that food temperatures on the South side meal cart were below the required levels, with chicken recorded at 111°F, which was below the expected 130°F. The facility's policy mandates that food be cooked to specific temperatures to prevent foodborne illnesses, with the danger zone being between 41°F and 135°F. Despite requests, documentation regarding the plate warmer's maintenance was not provided, and the Nursing Home Administrator only became aware of the issue on the day of the survey.
Failure to Notify and Invite Residents to Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the notification and invitation to participate in the comprehensive care plan were extended to two residents and their representatives. Resident #43, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, and hypertension, had a representative who was unaware of any care plan meetings. Similarly, Resident #44, admitted with conditions such as metabolic encephalopathy and dementia, also had a representative who had not received an invitation to attend care plan meetings. Interviews with facility staff revealed a breakdown in the process of sending out care plan meeting invitations. The Social Services Director indicated that the receptionist was previously responsible for this task, but it had since been assigned to the MDS nurse. However, the MDS nurse stated that the process involved creating a calendar and having the receptionist or SSD mail the invitations, which was not occurring as expected. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation was for families and residents to be invited to these meetings, as outlined in the facility's policies and procedures.
Deficiencies in Food Service Safety and Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by multiple deficiencies observed during a kitchen tour. A rag was found on the main production counter without being in a cleaning solution, and a personal jacket was improperly stored on a shelf with food items. Trash receptacles lacked lids, and chemicals were stored next to food items, contrary to safety protocols. Additionally, food items in the prep cooler were not properly dated or sealed, and personal food items were stored inappropriately in the cooking prep fridge. Further observations revealed that the dry storage area contained chemicals improperly stored at the entrance, and an open bottle of Teriyaki Marinade was not refrigerated as required. The walk-in freezer had significant ice build-up on the floor and fans, with condensation on the ceiling, and bags of ice were left open. The can opener and various kitchen surfaces, including the stove and oven, had significant build-up of grease and other substances, indicating a lack of proper cleaning and maintenance. The facility's policies, which require proper storage, labeling, and cleanliness, were not followed. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the need for a cleaning schedule, which was not in place at the time of the survey. The Nursing Home Administrator was informed of these findings, which highlighted the facility's failure to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in accordance with its own policies and the FDA food code.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Use, Equipment Cleanliness, and Linen Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by several deficiencies observed during a survey. One significant issue involved a staff member, Staff G, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who did not don the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering the room of a resident under contact isolation precautions. The resident, who had a Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection, required enhanced barrier precautions, including the use of gowns during direct care. However, Staff G only wore gloves and was unaware of the specific reasons for the precautions, indicating a lack of proper training or communication regarding infection control protocols. Another deficiency was observed with Resident #43, who had bed rails padded with textured pool noodles that were not easily cleanable. The Director of Nursing (DON), who also served as the infection preventionist, acknowledged the use of these materials and stated they were simply wiped down with disinfectant wipes. This practice does not align with infection control standards, as the textured surface of the pool noodles could harbor pathogens, posing a risk of infection transmission. Additionally, the facility's linen carts were found to be in poor condition, with torn and threadbare covers that were hanging open. This compromised the ability to transport and store linens in a manner that prevents contamination. The DON confirmed the need for replacement of these carts, but the Environmental Service Supervisor did not recognize any issues with them, suggesting a lack of awareness or oversight in maintaining equipment used for infection control. These findings highlight significant lapses in the facility's infection prevention and control measures, potentially increasing the risk of infection spread among residents and staff.
Failure to Address Grievance Regarding Insensitive Behavior
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly address a grievance filed on behalf of a resident concerning an incident involving the death of the resident's roommate. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia, had a family member who reported concerns to the facility. The family member described an incident where a member of the therapy team insensitively acknowledged the death of the resident's roommate in the presence of the resident. Despite the family member's immediate report to the facility's leadership and providing a written copy of the concerns to the Director of Nursing, the grievance was not adequately documented or resolved. The facility's grievance records showed two grievances filed for the resident, but the grievance related to the therapist's inconsiderate behavior was not fully addressed. The resolution section of the grievance form indicated that psychological support and sensitivity education were planned, but the date resolved, follow-up, and review sections were incomplete. Interviews with staff revealed that grievances are not always documented, and the facility's policy requires grievances to be resolved within five days, which was not adhered to in this case.
Inaccurate and Missing Advanced Directive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that advanced directive care plans were accurate or developed for three residents. Resident #31 was admitted with medical diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, and protein-calorie malnutrition, and was receiving hospice services. Despite having a physician's order for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, her care plan inaccurately reflected her as Full Code. The Social Services Director (SSD) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the discrepancy between the care plan and the physician's order. Resident #4, who was readmitted to the facility with multiple medical diagnoses including seizures and schizoaffective disorder, had a physician's order for Full Code status. However, there was no advanced directive care plan in place for this resident. The SSD and the Nursing Home Administrator, along with the Regional Nurse Consultant, acknowledged the absence of an advanced directive care plan, which was only created after the surveyor's review. Resident #36 had a DNR order signed by both the resident and the physician, yet the care plan inaccurately indicated Full Code status. The DON confirmed that the care plan should match the physician's orders and other documentation. The facility's policies on advanced directives and care planning emphasize the importance of documenting resident choices in the electronic medical record and involving residents and their representatives in care plan development and revisions.
Failure to Apply Prescribed Splint for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received appropriate care to maintain or improve range of motion, specifically by not applying a prescribed splint to the resident's left hand. The resident, who had a history of flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left side due to a stroke, was observed without the splint on multiple occasions. The resident expressed difficulty in using her left hand and noted that it would be beneficial to have something to keep her hand open, as it becomes 'smelly'. Despite having a physician's order to apply the splint after morning care and remove it before the evening, staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not wearing the splint. The resident's care plan included interventions to apply and remove the splint for joint protection, initiated on a specific date. However, interviews with multiple staff members, including CNAs and an LPN, revealed that the resident did not have the splint applied. The Director of Rehabilitation confirmed that the resident was last on the caseload in late 2023, and at that time, occupational therapy recommended the splint, which the resident was able to tolerate. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the physician's order for the splint and expected it to be applied as ordered. The facility's policy on resident mobility and range of motion emphasized the importance of preventing avoidable reductions in range of motion, which was not adhered to in this case.
Improper Garbage Disposal and Maintenance of Dumpster Area
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse, as observed during an inspection of the dumpster area outside the kitchen. Two dumpsters were found in the rear parking area near the kitchen door, emitting an extreme odor. The walls of both dumpsters were soiled with a brown/black substance, and the tops of the dumpsters were yellow in color. One dumpster lid was fully open, while the other was closed, but the side doors of both dumpsters were open, exposing the garbage inside. Additionally, multiple trash bags, crates, and significant amounts of debris, including used incontinent products, plastic utensils, gloves, empty pill wrappers, plastic cups, lids, straws, and numerous garbage bags, were noted to be stored on the side and back of the dumpsters. During an interview, the dietary manager acknowledged that the lids of the dumpsters should be closed, including the side doors, and that the area around the dumpsters should be clean and free of debris. The dietary manager mentioned that the issue of debris was discussed daily in morning meetings, but no changes were made, and the debris was not cleaned up. The facility's policy and procedure for food-related garbage and refuse disposal, dated October 2017, requires that all garbage and refuse containers have tight-fitting lids and be kept covered when not in continuous use. The policy also mandates that housekeeping personnel empty and clean the containers daily and that storage areas be kept clean at all times to prevent pest access and avoid constituting a nuisance.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 408 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 27 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Saint Petersburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Bayside Care Center | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Golfview Nursing Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Concordia Manor | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 3 |
| Alpine Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.