Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ludlowe Center For Health & Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe dementia, behavioral disturbances, and daily grabbing behaviors sustained a finger fracture after repeatedly grabbing and becoming trapped in bed side rails. Despite staff awareness of the resident's behaviors and frequent incidents of grabbing the rails, the care plan did not include specific interventions to prevent injury from side rail use, such as padding or removal. The lack of adequate supervision and failure to address known risks led to the resident's injury.
A resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and a history of aggressive grabbing behaviors did not have a care plan that included specific interventions to prevent injury from side rails, despite staff awareness and documentation of these behaviors. The omission led to the resident sustaining a hand fracture after grabbing the side rail, with staff interviews confirming the lack of formalized preventive measures in the care plan.
A resident with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and high fall risk was placed in a common area to be closely watched, but during shift change no one was monitoring the resident while charge nurses counted narcotics. The resident stood up from a wheelchair, fell, and sustained a skin tear, then later developed right leg/hip pain that was not promptly escalated; x-rays ultimately showed an acute nondisplaced femoral neck fracture.
Failure to evaluate whether a cognitively intact resident could safely self-administer oxygen. A resident with heart disease, CKD, HF, altered respiratory status, difficulty breathing, and hypoxemia was observed using O2 at 2 L via NC, and an LPN stated the resident puts the oxygen on when short of breath without the physician's awareness. The ADNS and DON both stated an evaluation was needed, and the facility policy required a licensed nurse self-administration evaluation before a provider order for self-administration.
Failure to document and resolve missing clothing grievance: A cognitively intact resident with chronic pain reported missing pants, shirts, and a sweater after laundry was sent out, but staff did not document the concern as a grievance or clearly track resolution. An NA, an LPN, the laundry aide, and the DON/housekeeping leader were aware of the issue, yet records lacked a belongings checklist and no clear follow-through was identified despite the facility’s grievance and lost property policies.
Incomplete discharge documentation and communication: A resident with pneumonia, dysphagia, and moderate cognitive impairment had an incomplete discharge summary, with nursing, PT/OT/speech therapy, and dietary sections left unfinished. The record also lacked a W-10 and physician discharge order, and the functional abilities discharge form was largely blank and unsigned, while the social service section noted home care, a private duty nurse aide, oxygen, a transport chair, and PCP follow-up.
Care Plans Not Updated for Catheter Care and Geri Sleeve Noncompliance: A resident with an indwelling catheter had a physician order for catheter irrigation, ongoing pain, and no care plan interventions reflecting the catheter. Another resident with dementia, DM, and fragile skin had an order for bilateral geri sleeves, but observations showed the sleeves were not in use and the care plan did not address the resident’s refusal/noncompliance.
A resident with Alzheimer’s disease and severe cognitive impairment was supposed to be transferred with 2 staff per the care plan, but after an unwitnessed fall an NA moved the resident back to bed alone. Another resident with dementia, diabetes, and fragile skin had a physician order for bilateral geri sleeves every shift, but observations showed the sleeves were not in place and staff reported the resident was refusing them.
Missing oxygen order and undated tubing: A resident with altered respiratory status, hypoxemia, heart disease, CKD, and HF was observed using O2 at 2 L via NC, but the tubing was not dated when changed. Staff stated the resident used oxygen when short of breath even though there was no physician order for oxygen at the time, and the DON confirmed tubing should be changed and dated weekly.
A resident with a G-tube, ventilator dependence, anxiety, and depression had pharmacy consultant reviews noting that several meds were ordered by mouth even though most meds were given via feeding tube. The consultant recommended considering route changes for PRN milk of magnesia and later for pantoprazole and lorazepam, but the recommendations were not addressed in a timely manner, and leadership confirmed the March and May pharmacy findings were handled months later than expected.
A resident with dementia was slapped in the face by another resident, also with dementia, in a recreation room. The affected resident had a care plan addressing prior incidents and required monitoring, but the physical abuse occurred without provocation. Facility staff confirmed the event and separated the residents afterward, but the incident reflects a failure to protect the resident from abuse as required by policy.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions experienced a critically low blood pressure that was recorded by a nursing assistant but not communicated to the assigned LPN. As a result, supervisory staff were not notified, and no timely assessment or intervention occurred, contrary to facility policy requiring prompt notification and evaluation of significant changes in condition.
A resident with a femur fracture and UTI did not receive Vancomycin as ordered due to a transcription error. The medication was placed on hold from 3/3 to 3/6, despite orders for daily administration. The error was discovered on 3/7, and the medication was restarted. The facility's policy requires timely administration per physician orders.
A resident with hemiplegia and muscle weakness did not receive timely incontinent care after requesting assistance during the night shift. The nurse aide on duty was the only one assigned to the unit and became occupied with other tasks, forgetting to return to the resident. The resident had to wait approximately 2.5 hours until the next shift for care. The unit was short-staffed, and there was a lack of communication about the need for additional help.
A facility failed to provide adequate staffing, resulting in a resident not receiving timely incontinent care. The resident, who required assistance with toileting, requested care during the night shift but had to wait over two hours due to staffing shortages. The scheduled NA called out, and the facility's attempt to cover the shift was unsuccessful, leaving the remaining NA overwhelmed and unable to meet all residents' needs.
Failure to Prevent Injury from Side Rail Use in Resident with Behavioral Risks
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and a history of grabbing behaviors was not adequately protected from injury related to side rail use. The resident was non-ambulatory, dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, and exhibited daily grabbing behaviors, including grabbing side rails during care and transfers. The care plan identified the resident's behavioral risks and directed staff to monitor and intervene before agitation escalated, but did not include specific interventions to prevent injury from side rail use, despite staff being aware of the resident's tendency to grab the rails. Multiple nursing assistants reported that the resident consistently grabbed the side rails during care, sometimes requiring them to place a pillow between the resident and the rails to prevent injury. On one occasion, a nursing assistant observed the resident's hand stuck between the bars of the side rail but did not notify a nurse, as this was a frequent occurrence. The facility's documentation and interviews confirmed that the resident's right hand and fingers were found swollen and bruised, with an x-ray revealing an acute nondisplaced fracture of the fifth finger. The injury was determined to have occurred when the resident's hand became trapped in the lower opening of the side rail, aligning with the observed bruising. Despite the known risk behaviors and repeated incidents of grabbing the side rails, the care plan lacked interventions such as padding or removal of the side rails to prevent injury. Facility leadership, including the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing, acknowledged awareness of the resident's behaviors but could not explain why preventive measures were not implemented prior to the injury. The facility's behavior management policy required maintaining a safe environment, but this was not achieved in this case, resulting in the resident sustaining a fracture.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident with Grabbing Behaviors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with specific interventions to address a resident's known grabbing behaviors, particularly in relation to the use of side rails. The resident had a history of dementia with behavioral disturbances, severely impaired cognition, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, including bed mobility and transfers. The care plan identified the resident's potential for aggressive behaviors and included general interventions such as monitoring behaviors and redirecting agitation, but did not include targeted measures to prevent injury from grabbing side rails. Despite multiple staff members documenting and reporting that the resident consistently grabbed side rails and exhibited sudden, resistive movements during care and transfers, the care plan lacked interventions to mitigate the risk of injury from these behaviors. Staff interviews revealed that, in practice, some staff used pillows to position the resident's arms or to prevent grabbing, but these actions were not formalized in the care plan. The facility's documentation and investigation confirmed that the resident's grabbing behaviors were well known prior to the incident. An incident occurred in which the resident sustained a nondisplaced fracture of the right hand, with evidence indicating the injury was caused by the resident placing their hand in the lower opening of the side rail. The facility's summary and staff interviews confirmed that the discoloration and injury aligned with the side rail, and that the side rails were subsequently discontinued and replaced with a perimeter mattress. However, prior to the injury, the care plan did not include interventions such as padding or removing the side rails to prevent injury, despite the resident's established risk and staff awareness of the behaviors.
Failure to Maintain Supervision for a High Fall-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia who was identified as a high fall risk and had care plan interventions for close monitoring, 2-person assistance for transfers and bed mobility, and ambulation only with therapy. The resident’s admission MDS described severe cognitive impairment, use of a walker and wheelchair, maximum assistance needed for sit-to-stand and transfers, and dependence on staff for ambulating 10 feet. The care plan also identified poor communication/comprehension, impaired mobility, impaired cognition, resistance to care, and medications that increased fall risk. On the evening of the fall, staff had placed the resident in the dining room/common area with other residents who were being watched because they were restless or could not sleep. The resident was sitting in a wheelchair when the fall occurred at the change of shift. The charge nurse later documented that the resident stood up and was found on the floor with a skin tear to the right elbow. Staff interviews indicated that during shift change the charge nurses were counting narcotic medications and no one was watching the resident in the dining room at that time. Staff also stated they did not know who was assigned to monitor the residents in that area, and one aide had already left the unit to report to another assignment. After the fall, the resident was documented as confused, restless, agitated at times, and making several attempts to ambulate unassisted. Initial assessments noted no obvious pain or limb abnormalities other than the elbow skin tear, and the resident was monitored with range of motion and neurological checks. The resident later complained of right leg pain, but this was not immediately reported to the supervisor or physician according to the regional RN’s interview. Several days after the fall, the resident was noted to have right hip pain and difficulty lifting the right lower extremity, x-rays were ordered, and an acute nondisplaced fracture at the base of the femoral neck was identified.
Failure to Evaluate Self-Administration of Oxygen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to determine whether it was clinically appropriate for Resident #98 to self-administer oxygen. Resident #98 was admitted in April 2025 with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. The quarterly MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact and requiring moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, showering, upper and lower body dressing, and transfers. The resident care plan dated 7/31/25 identified altered respiratory status, difficulty breathing, and hypoxemia, with interventions including positioning for optimal breathing and administering oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Observations on 9/8/25 and 9/9/25 showed Resident #98 seated in a wheelchair or in bed with oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula. During interview, an LPN stated the resident puts the oxygen on when feeling short of breath and the physician is not aware. The ADNS stated that if the resident puts oxygen on when short of breath, there should be a physician order and the resident should be evaluated to ensure the ability to self-administer oxygen. The DON stated that an evaluation is needed to determine the resident's ability to safely self-administer oxygen. The facility self-administration policy required a licensed nurse to complete a self-administration evaluation and, if appropriate, obtain a provider order for self-administration of the specific medication or treatment.
Failure to Document and Resolve Missing Clothing Grievance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to acknowledge and actively work toward resolving a resident’s complaint of missing clothing. The resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including chronic pain. The quarterly MDS indicated the resident required set-up or clean-up assistance for upper-body dressing and supervision or touching assistance for lower-body dressing, and the care plan identified a self-care deficit with interventions for supervision, verbal cues, or touch assist for dressing. The resident reported missing 2 to 3 pairs of pants, 2 shirts, and a sweater that had been taken to the laundry about 3 weeks earlier, and stated the sweater was one frequently used for morning appointments. The resident said the concern had been told to an NA and a laundry aide, but the resident did not know whether the clothes were labeled or whether anything was being done, and family had since been doing the laundry. Review of nursing notes and social work documentation did not identify documentation related to missing belongings, and the clinical record did not contain a Personal Belongings Checklist. Staff interviews showed multiple employees were aware of the missing clothing, but there was no documented grievance or clear follow-through. An NA stated the resident had complained about missing clothes and that a pajama suit was found in another resident’s room and returned. An LPN knew the resident was missing clothes but could not identify what had been done. The Director of Housekeeping stated the facility had a tracking system and used grievance forms for missing belongings, but also said the resident must have been overlooked and no grievance had been written. The laundry aide said the resident had complained several times, including crying about the missing sweater, and that she had searched the laundry room without finding the items. The facility policy required lost property reports to be documented as grievances and a thorough search conducted, and the grievance policy stated staff should attempt to resolve concerns promptly or complete a grievance form for social services when not resolved.
Incomplete discharge documentation and communication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #154’s discharge information was complete and that complete information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider. Resident #154 had diagnoses including pneumonia and dysphagia, and the admission MDS indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The care plan dated 07/3/2025 identified the need for a safe and appropriate discharge plan, including assessing discharge needs, involving the resident, family, and/or responsible party in discharge planning, and providing education regarding medications, treatments, and therapy home evaluations if needed. The Discharge Summary Guide-V4 dated 07/25/2025 at 1:35 PM was incomplete, with sections not completed by nursing, PT/OT/speech therapy, and dietary. The social service section indicated the resident was to receive home care services, have a private duty nurse aide, and had oxygen and a transport chair ordered through a supplier, with follow-up needed with the primary physician. The retained discharge documentation also included an 8-page NAC: Functional Abilities Summary-discharge and NPE-V5 form with functional status blank on the first 7 1/2 pages and no staff signature. The DNS stated she could not locate the W-10 or a physician order for discharge home with services, and SW #2 confirmed the interdisciplinary discharge summary was not completed or signed by the complete interdisciplinary team and no physician order was found.
Care Plans Not Updated for Catheter Care and Geri Sleeve Noncompliance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a care plan with interventions for a resident with an indwelling catheter. The resident had diagnoses including retention of urine, and a physician’s order dated 7/31/25 directed irrigation of the indwelling catheter with 60 cc of sterile saline. The admission MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact, dependent with toilet hygiene, and requiring maximum assistance with bed mobility. The care plan dated 8/7/25 did not reflect the indwelling catheter. During interview on 09/08/2025, the resident stated he/she had ongoing pain due to the catheter and reported the pain to staff, but staff had not been able to give an answer. The DNS stated on 9/15/2025 that a care plan should identify focus areas and that the nursing team is responsible for ensuring this is done, and was unsure why the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident’s indwelling catheter. The facility also failed to update the care plan for a resident with skin concerns to include noncompliance with geri sleeves. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and nonthrombocytopenic purpura, and the quarterly MDS identified severe cognitive impairment with moderate to maximal assistance needed for toileting hygiene, dressing, hygiene, and transfers. The RCP dated 8/7/25 identified potential for skin breakdown due to muscle weakness and included skin checks, reporting changes to the nurse, and treatments as ordered. A physician’s order dated 8/17/25 directed bilateral upper extremity geri sleeves every shift for fragile skin related to nonthrombocytopenic purpura, with placement checks every shift and removal for care as needed. Observations on 9/8/25 and 9/15/25 found the resident dressed in a long sleeve top without geri sleeves. An LPN stated the resident refused to wear the sleeves, did not currently have them on, had a history of skin tears to both arms, and was non-compliant with the geri sleeves. The ADNS stated that if the resident refused, staff should re-approach, notify family and the physician, and develop a care plan to address the noncompliance.
Failure to Follow Transfer Assistance and Skin Protection Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 was transferred with the assistance of 2 staff members as directed in the care plan. Resident #12 had Alzheimer's disease, was severely cognitively impaired, used a walker and wheelchair, and required maximum assistance for transfers. The care plan dated 05/5/2025 specified the resident needed 2 staff members for transfers and bed mobility. After an unwitnessed fall on 05/09/2025 at 10:57 PM, the resident sustained a skin tear to the right elbow and was described as alert, restless, agitated, confused at times, with poor safety awareness and several attempts to ambulate unassisted. A nurse aide reported that she assisted the resident back to bed alone from the wheelchair without another staff member, standing the resident and turning the resident to sit on the side of the bed. The facility also failed to ensure geri sleeves were applied per physician order for Resident #13. Resident #13 had dementia, diabetes, and nonthrombocytopenic purpura, and the quarterly MDS identified severe cognitive impairment with moderate to maximal assistance needed for activities including transfers and personal care. A physician's order dated 8/17/25 directed bilateral upper extremity geri sleeves every shift for fragile skin related to nonthrombocytopenic purpura, with placement checked every shift and removal allowed for care. Observations on 9/8/25 and 9/15/25 showed the resident dressed in a long sleeve top without geri sleeves on the arms. An LPN stated the resident refused to wear the sleeves and had a history of skin tears to both arms, and the ADNS stated staff should re-approach the resident, notify the family and physician if refusal continued, and follow the physician's order.
Missing oxygen order and undated tubing
Penalty
Summary
Safe and appropriate respiratory care was not provided for Resident #98, who was admitted with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. The quarterly MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact and needing moderate assistance with several activities of daily living. The resident care plan dated 5/16/25 identified altered respiratory status and difficulty breathing with hypoxemia, with interventions including positioning for optimal breathing and administering oxygen 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During observations on 9/8/25 and 9/9/25, Resident #98 was seen seated in a wheelchair and later in bed with oxygen at 2 L via nasal cannula, but the oxygen tubing was not dated when last changed and no date label was present. LPN #1 stated the resident was on oxygen and the tubing should be changed and dated on Sundays, but had not noticed it was undated. The DNS stated oxygen tubing should be changed and dated weekly, and if it is not dated, it should be changed and a date label placed on by the nurse. LPN #1 later stated the resident did not have a physician's order for oxygen, although the resident used oxygen when feeling short of breath. The ADNS confirmed that if the resident placed oxygen on via nasal, there should be a physician's order. Review of the vitals summary showed the resident received oxygen via nasal cannula on multiple dates before surveyor inquiry, and subsequent physician orders were entered for oxygen as needed and for weekly tubing changes.
Delayed Response to Pharmacy Medication Review Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address pharmacy consultant recommendations in a timely manner for one resident who was admitted with chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, dependence on a ventilator, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and a gastrostomy tube. The resident’s care documentation identified swallowing difficulty and the need for enteral nutrition and flushes per MD orders. A pharmacy consultant drug regimen review dated 3/20/25 noted a PRN order for milk of magnesia to be given by mouth even though most medications were administered via feeding tube, and recommended considering an updated route of administration; the form was not signed. A later pharmacy consultant review dated 5/15/25 again noted standing and PRN oral medication orders, including pantoprazole, lorazepam, and milk of magnesia, while the resident received most medications via G-tube, and recommended considering updating the route of administration. The report was dated 9/14/25. The resident’s orders were later changed to G-tube administration for milk of magnesia, lorazepam, and protonix. Interviews with the DNS and ADNS on 9/15/25 confirmed that pharmacy recommendations were emailed to leadership and unit managers for physician or APRN review, and both stated that the March 2025 recommendation should have been addressed sooner than August 2025 and the May 2025 recommendation sooner than September 2025. The facility policy required findings and recommendations to be communicated to those responsible for implementation and answered in a timely fashion.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder was involved in an incident where another resident, also diagnosed with dementia, slapped them on the right side of the face in a recreation room. The care plan for the resident who was slapped had previously identified a risk for resident-to-resident incidents and included interventions such as providing emotional support and monitoring for changes in mood or behavior. Despite these interventions, the incident occurred without provocation, as observed and documented by facility staff. Facility documentation and staff interviews confirmed that the two residents were separated following the incident, and there was no indication of prior altercations between them. The resident who was slapped did not sustain an injury and denied pain. The facility's abuse policy states that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, but the incident demonstrates a failure to ensure this protection for the resident involved.
Failure to Notify Nurse of Significant Change in Resident Condition
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to ensure timely notification of a significant change in condition for a resident with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and dementia. The resident's care plan included monitoring vital signs due to fluid deficit and increased caloric demand. On the morning in question, a nursing assistant recorded a critically low blood pressure of 76/33 but did not notify the assigned LPN. The LPN, who was unaware of the low reading, stated she only checked vital signs in the EMR if required for medication administration, which was not the case for this resident. As a result, no evaluation or further assessment was completed at that time. Interviews with supervisory staff, including the RN supervisor, APRN, and DON, confirmed that they were not informed of the resident's low blood pressure and that facility policy required notification and assessment in such cases. The facility's practice was for nursing assistants to document or verbally report vital signs to the nurse, who was then responsible for reviewing and acting on them. The failure to communicate the significant change in the resident's condition led to a lack of timely assessment and intervention, as required by facility policy.
Medication Administration Error Due to Transcription Mistake
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a physician order for Vancomycin was transcribed accurately, resulting in a medication administration error for a resident with a non-displaced right femur fracture and urinary tract infection. The resident was supposed to receive Vancomycin every 24 hours as per the physician's order dated 3/3/2023, but the medication was inadvertently placed on hold from 3/3/2023 to 3/6/2023. The error was identified on 3/7/2023, and the medication was restarted. The resident's care plan and physician orders clearly indicated the need for daily administration of the antibiotic, but the transcription error led to missed doses. The incident was documented in a facility incident report, which noted that the unit manager discovered the error on 3/7/2023. Interviews with staff revealed that RN #2 had entered the start date for the medication incorrectly, leading to the hold. Despite attempts, an interview with the former Director of Nursing Services was not obtained. The facility's Medication Pass Policy emphasizes the importance of administering medications safely and timely per physician orders, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Timely Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely incontinent care to a resident who was cognitively intact but dependent on assistance for toileting and personal hygiene. The resident, who had diagnoses of hemiplegia and muscle weakness, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and required assistance with toileting. On the night in question, the resident requested incontinent care from a nurse aide between 4:30 AM and 5:00 AM, but the aide did not return to provide the care due to being occupied with other duties and being the only aide on the unit. As a result, the resident did not receive the requested care until the next shift, approximately 2.5 hours later. Interviews with staff revealed that the unit was short-staffed, with only one nurse aide assigned during the shift, and there was a lack of communication regarding the need for additional assistance. The nurse aide who was supposed to assist did not come to the unit, and the LPN on duty was unaware of the staffing issue. The facility's practice was to attend to residents' needs promptly, but this was not adhered to in this instance, leading to the deficiency.
Inadequate Staffing Leads to Delayed Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of its residents, specifically for incontinent care. Resident #2, who was cognitively intact but dependent on assistance for toileting, was occasionally incontinent of bladder. On the night in question, the resident requested incontinent care between 4:30 AM and 5:00 AM, but the nursing assistant (NA#1) was unable to provide care immediately due to being the only NA on the unit and needing to respond to other call lights. As a result, Resident #2 did not receive the requested care until two to two and a half hours later when the first shift nurse's aide arrived. The staffing issue arose because NA#2, who was scheduled to work, called out, and the facility attempted to cover the shift by splitting NA#3's hours between two units. However, NA#3 was not informed of this change and only worked on the third floor, leaving NA#1 without the necessary assistance. The charge nurse (LPN #1) was unaware of the staffing shortage and did not assist NA#1. The facility's usual staffing pattern for the shift was two NAs and one licensed nurse, but this was not maintained, leading to the deficiency in care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 522 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fairfield
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mozaic Senior Life | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 34 | 0 |
| Cambridge Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Springs At 3030 Park, The | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Civita Care Northbridge | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 0 |
| Maefair Center For Health & Rehabilitation | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ludlowe Center For Health & Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.