Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Life Care Center Of Westminster during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a history of falls, fractures, and significant mobility impairment experienced an unwitnessed fall from bed, which had been left in a high position despite care-plan interventions requiring it to be kept low with a fall mat. An RN found the resident on the floor, initiated neuro checks, and documented elevated BP readings and pain but did not complete or document a thorough head-to-toe assessment before moving the resident back to bed, and did not promptly notify the MD, hospice, or the resident’s representative. Hospice was contacted several hours later due to rising BP and severe pain; a hospice RN then assessed the resident, notified the on-call MD, and obtained an order to transfer the resident to the hospital, where imaging revealed multiple fractures and a scalp contusion. Staff interviews and facility policy confirmed that standard practice required immediate RN assessment prior to moving a fallen resident, timely MD and family notification, and adherence to fall-prevention interventions, all of which were not followed in this case.
A resident at risk for pressure injuries developed an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left heel after staff failed to implement and document appropriate heel protection and offloading interventions. Despite the presence of risk factors and early signs of skin breakdown, the care plan was not updated, and heel protection devices were not used while the resident was in bed or a wheelchair. Staff interviews revealed gaps in awareness and execution of pressure injury prevention protocols.
The facility's medication error rate was found to be 13%, exceeding the acceptable threshold, due to multiple instances where LPNs were unable to locate and administer prescribed medications, including both prescription and over-the-counter drugs, and in some cases failed to notify the physician. The DON confirmed there was no formal system for tracking medication availability, contributing to these errors.
Residents repeatedly reported insufficient CNA coverage, long call light wait times, and lack of hot water for showers during resident council meetings and interviews. Despite these ongoing grievances, facility leadership did not implement effective solutions, and documentation showed persistent issues with missed showers, delayed assistance, and inadequate monitoring of call light response times, particularly during evenings and weekends. Staff interviews confirmed that short staffing and reliance on agency personnel contributed to unresolved resident concerns.
Three residents were found to be receiving psychotropic medications without proper clinical justification, mood and behavior monitoring, or documentation of target behaviors. One resident was on three antidepressants with no documented rationale, while two others lacked specific care plans and tracking for their psychotropic medication use. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of required monitoring and documentation practices.
The facility did not provide or document required annual abuse prevention and reporting training for multiple staff, including CNAs, an RN, and an LPN. Review of records and staff interviews confirmed that mandated education on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and reporting procedures was not completed as required by facility policy.
Two residents did not consistently receive showers according to their expressed preferences and care plans, with one resident missing showers on preferred days for family visits and another missing scheduled weekly showers due to equipment issues and lack of rescheduling. Staff were unaware of specific resident requests and documentation errors contributed to the deficiency.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions reported concerns about the care and communication provided by a CNA, including infrequent changes and perceived rudeness. The resident voiced these concerns to several staff members and submitted a formal grievance, but there was no documented follow-up or resolution for several months. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the complaint but indicated that no action was taken until the day of the survey interview, contrary to the facility's grievance policy requiring prompt resolution.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions was not consistently given prescribed medications, including pain medication, inhalers, and supplements, due to repeated unavailability in the facility. Staff interviews revealed there was no formal system to track or ensure the availability of over-the-counter medications, and communication about shortages only occurred after medications were already missing. The pharmacy confirmed timely refills, but the DON and PCP were not fully aware of the missed doses, and documentation did not consistently show physician notification.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and depression received antipsychotic medication without adequate documentation of diagnosis or indication in the EMR. For four consecutive months, pharmacy consultation reports recommended updates and monitoring, but the DON did not distribute these recommendations to physicians, resulting in no physician review or documentation of actions taken.
The facility did not ensure that two residents on long-term prophylactic antibiotics had documented physician rationale, specified duration, or ongoing monitoring and reassessment of their antibiotic use. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of specific monitoring or care planning for chronic antibiotic therapy, and the required documentation was missing from the medical records.
The facility failed to honor the beverage preferences of three residents, specifically their choice to have soda with dinner. Despite being cognitively intact and requiring assistance with daily activities, residents reported feeling disregarded and upset by the restriction, which only allowed soda during lunch. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the availability of soda, with the food service director claiming it was available on beverage carts, while the nursing home administrator cited concerns about hoarding as a reason for the restriction.
The facility failed to ensure timely responses to residents' call lights, affecting their right to a dignified existence. Two residents reported feeling neglected due to long wait times for assistance, with delays ranging from 30 minutes to three hours. Observations showed staff, including the NHA and DON, did not promptly address activated call lights, with delays of up to 14 minutes. A CNA expressed concerns about inadequate staffing levels, and the NHA acknowledged the expectation for a 15-minute response time.
A resident with cerebral palsy, requiring a mechanical lift for transfers, was improperly transferred by an agency CNA who ignored the care plan and attempted a stand and pivot transfer. This resulted in the resident sustaining an acute fracture of the left femur. The facility's investigation confirmed the neglect, and the agency CNA was prohibited from returning.
Failure to Assess, Notify, and Respond Appropriately After Unwitnessed Fall With Major Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards following an unwitnessed fall. A cognitively intact resident with a history of falls, prior fractures (including a right humerus fracture), osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking was admitted with orders and care plan interventions that included keeping the bed in the lowest position, use of a high-impact fall mat, and a lipped mattress. The resident required maximal assistance with transfers and used a wheelchair. On the night of the incident, the resident was found on the floor on her left side in a somewhat fetal position, partially on and partially off the fall mat, with the bed raised in a high position. RN #1, who heard a loud sound and discovered the resident on the floor, documented an initial assessment that included vital signs showing elevated blood pressure and initiation of neurological monitoring. However, there was no documentation that RN #1 completed a thorough head-to-toe assessment before the resident was moved back to bed, despite facility policy requiring a nurse evaluation to determine presence of injury prior to moving a resident who has fallen. The record lacked evidence of a full assessment of injuries at the time of the fall, even though the resident later was found to have multiple fractures and a scalp contusion. Staff interviews, including from the DON and other nurses, confirmed that standard practice and policy required a complete RN assessment before moving a resident after a fall. Following the fall, RN #1 did not notify the physician, the resident’s representative, or hospice at the time of the incident, despite facility policy and staff statements that the physician and responsible party should be notified immediately after the assessment. The resident’s blood pressure continued to rise over several hours, and she complained of pain, yet the first notification was to hospice at 6:00 a.m., approximately three hours after the fall. The hospice RN arrived around 6:30 a.m., found the resident arousable to verbal stimuli with tense features, facial grimacing, and reporting severe pain, and then notified the on-call physician, who ordered transfer to the hospital. Hospital imaging revealed a left parietotemporal scalp contusion, an acute nondisplaced C7 vertebral fracture, multiple displaced fractures of at least the first six left ribs, a left scapula fracture, and a left clavicle fracture. The facility also failed to ensure the resident’s bed was maintained at a safe, low height as care-planned, and the transfer to the hospital did not occur until after hospice assessment and physician notification several hours post-fall. The resident’s representative reported that the resident lay in bed for three hours in severe pain without medical attention and that the family and physician were not notified by facility staff, but rather by hospice. Documentation showed that the facility did not contact the resident’s representative until later that afternoon, after the hospital had already identified multiple fractures and the resident was being admitted to intensive or trauma care. Staff interviews, including from CNAs, an LPN, an RN, and the DON, consistently described that facility practice required immediate RN assessment before moving a resident, prompt vital signs and neurological checks, and immediate notification of the physician and responsible party after a fall, particularly if there was pain or potential major injury. In this case, the facility failed to accurately and timely assess the resident after the fall, failed to promptly notify the physician and responsible party, did not ensure the bed was at the lowest and safest height, and did not ensure timely transfer to the hospital after an unwitnessed fall that resulted in major injury and pain. The facility’s own fall care plan and incident policy emphasized prevention of avoidable accidents, completion of a nurse evaluation prior to moving a resident who has fallen, and documentation of injury status and notifications. Despite these requirements, the EMR lacked a full head-to-toe assessment at the time of the fall, and the DON acknowledged that RN #1, an agency nurse, failed to document the fall appropriately, complete an accurate assessment, and notify the physician and the resident’s representative. The hospice RN confirmed that RN #1 did not notify the physician or the resident’s representative and that hospice was contacted due to the resident’s increased pain and rising blood pressure. These actions and omissions collectively led to the cited deficiency for failure to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and the resident’s care plan following the fall.
Failure to Implement Heel Protection Leads to Unstageable Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
A resident was admitted for long-term care and identified as being at risk for developing pressure injuries, with no wounds present upon admission. Despite this risk, the facility failed to implement and document appropriate preventative measures, particularly for heel protection, after a slightly darkened area was first noted on the resident's left inner heel. There was no evidence in the medical record that the area was monitored or that interventions were put in place to prevent further skin breakdown between the initial finding and the development of an open wound. On a later date, the resident developed a new open area on the left inner heel, which progressed to an unstageable pressure ulcer as documented by both nursing staff and a wound care physician. Observations revealed that the resident did not have heel protection devices in place while in bed or in a wheelchair, and both heels were seen resting directly on hard surfaces. The care plan was not updated to include interventions for heel protection, and there were no physician's orders for pressure-relieving devices or heel offloading before or after the wound developed. Interviews with nursing staff indicated a lack of awareness and implementation of heel offloading interventions, with some staff unaware of the wound's origin or the need for specific protective measures. The wound care physician confirmed that the injury could have been prevented with timely offloading and repositioning. The director of nursing acknowledged that high-risk residents should have soft pressure-relieving devices and regular monitoring, but these measures were not documented or observed in practice for this resident.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold Due to Missed Doses and Tracking Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent, resulting in a calculated error rate of 13% with four errors out of 29 observed opportunities. During medication administration, staff were unable to locate prescribed medications, including Vitamin A and cranberry tablets for one resident, and amlodipine for another resident. In these instances, the medications were not administered as ordered, and in some cases, the physician was not notified of the missed doses. Additionally, an LPN mistakenly prepared simethicone instead of sodium bicarbonate for a resident, but recognized the error before administration. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of a formal system to track the availability of over-the-counter medications, and inconsistent communication regarding medication supply. The DON stated reliance on unit managers, central supply, and floor nurses to ensure medication availability, but acknowledged the absence of a structured process. The observed failures to administer medications as prescribed and to notify physicians as required contributed directly to the elevated medication error rate.
Failure to Resolve Resident Council Grievances Regarding Staffing and Shower Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly resolve grievances raised by the resident council regarding insufficient floor staff, long call light wait times, and lack of hot water for showers. Multiple residents, including the resident council president and vice president, reported repeated issues during interviews and resident council meetings. Residents described frequent staff shortages, especially on evenings and weekends, resulting in long waits for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), pain medication, and showers. Several residents also noted that agency staff were unfamiliar with their care needs, and that the facility no longer felt like a home. Resident council meeting minutes over several months documented ongoing concerns about missed or delayed showers, cold water in the shower rooms, and inadequate CNA coverage, particularly on weekends. Despite these concerns being raised repeatedly, the meeting minutes did not indicate specific actions taken to ensure residents received scheduled showers or that the hot water issue was resolved. The facility leadership acknowledged the problems and stated that efforts were being made to hire more staff and address the water issue, but the same concerns persisted in subsequent meetings. Call light observation logs revealed that monitoring was not conducted during evening, night, or weekend shifts, and documented wait times ranged from one to over 50 minutes. Staff interviews confirmed that staffing shortages led to delayed responses to call lights and unmet resident care needs. Maintenance staff were only recently made aware of the hot water issue, despite residents having reported it for several months. The DON and NHA both acknowledged ongoing staffing challenges and the reliance on agency staff, which contributed to the unresolved grievances.
Failure to Justify and Monitor Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were as free from unnecessary psychotropic medications as possible, as evidenced by the lack of appropriate clinical justification, monitoring, and documentation for the use of such medications in three out of five residents reviewed. For one resident, there was no documented physician rationale for the concurrent use of three antidepressant medications, despite the resident experiencing significant drowsiness and sleeping up to sixteen hours per day. The physician could not recall if a rationale for the use of multiple antidepressants was documented, and the medical record did not provide justification for the continued use of trazodone in the context of excessive sleep. Two other residents were found to be receiving psychotropic medications, including antidepressants and antipsychotics, without proper mood and behavior monitoring or documentation of target behaviors to justify the use of these medications. Their care plans did not specify which behaviors or symptoms were being targeted by the medications, and there was no mood or behavior tracking documented in their treatment administration records. Additionally, one resident was prescribed an antipsychotic without a documented diagnosis or adequate indication for its use in the medical record. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility did not have a system in place for mood or behavior tracking related to psychotropic medication diagnoses, and only tracked medication side effects. The social services assistant, pharmacy consultant, and DON all acknowledged the absence of specific mood and behavior care plans and tracking, which are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and ongoing need for psychotropic medications. The facility's own policy required documentation of adequate indications for medication use and proper monitoring, which was not followed in these cases.
Failure to Provide Required Annual Abuse Prevention Training to Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required annual training to staff on abuse identification, prevention, and reporting, as well as education on neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Record review revealed that five staff members, including three certified nurse aides, one registered nurse, and one licensed practical nurse, did not have documentation of having completed the mandated annual abuse training within the past 12 months. The facility's policy requires all employees to receive orientation and ongoing training on abuse prevention and reporting, including bi-annual in-service training, but there was no evidence that this was completed for the staff reviewed. Interviews with the nursing home administrator (NHA) and director of nursing (DON) confirmed the lack of documentation for the required training. The NHA, who had been in the role for three months, was unable to locate records of abuse in-service training for the identified staff. The DON, who assumed responsibility for staff education after the previous staffing coordinator resigned, also could not confirm that the training had been completed. This lack of training and documentation directly led to the deficiency cited by surveyors.
Failure to Honor Resident Shower Preferences and Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor and facilitate resident choices regarding shower schedules for two residents out of a sample of four, as required by their care plans and expressed preferences. One resident, who was cognitively intact and independent in activities of daily living but required supervision for showers, consistently requested showers on Saturdays and Wednesday mornings to accommodate family visits and personal appointments. Despite these requests, the resident continued to receive showers on Mondays and Thursdays, and on one occasion, did not receive a shower at all after waiting the entire day. Documentation inconsistencies were also noted, with staff marking a shower as given when it was not provided. Another resident, also cognitively intact but fully dependent on staff for all activities of daily living due to end-stage multiple sclerosis and quadriplegia, was scheduled for one shower per week on Sundays. The resident reported that if a Sunday shower was missed, it was not rescheduled, resulting in missed opportunities for personal hygiene. On at least two occasions, the resident did not receive a shower as scheduled, including one instance where the preferred shower chair was unavailable and alternative options were declined by the resident. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness regarding the residents' specific preferences and missed showers. The DON stated that the facility attempted to honor shower requests as staffing allowed but was not aware of the residents' specific needs or the missed showers. Documentation errors and communication gaps contributed to the failure to provide showers according to resident choice and care plans.
Failure to Promptly Resolve Resident Grievance Regarding CNA Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly resolve a grievance raised by a resident regarding the care provided by a certified nurse aide (CNA). The resident, who was cognitively intact and required significant assistance with activities of daily living due to multiple chronic conditions, reported that the CNA only changed her twice per eight-hour shift, did not communicate with her, and was perceived as rude. The resident expressed her concerns to multiple staff members, including leaving a message for the nursing home administrator (NHA), but did not receive feedback or resolution. A Concern and Comments form was completed by the resident, documenting her issues with the CNA and indicating that the concern was reported to an LPN. However, the form did not show any actions taken to address or resolve the grievance. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident had voiced her concerns as early as January, but no follow-up occurred until months later. The LPN acknowledged that the facility did not follow up with the resident about her concerns until the day of the survey interview, at which point the CNA was removed from the resident's care team. Additional staff interviews revealed that other nurses were aware of the resident's concerns for several months but were not aware of any actions taken or resolutions provided. The NHA stated he was not aware of the grievance until recently and had not received any messages from the resident. Despite the facility's grievance policy requiring prompt efforts to resolve complaints, the documentation and interviews demonstrated a lack of timely response and resolution for the resident's grievance.
Failure to Administer Medications as Ordered Due to Lack of Availability and Tracking
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple chronic conditions, including COPD, morbid obesity, asthma, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, anxiety, depression, chronic kidney disease, insomnia, and sleep apnea, was not consistently administered prescribed medications as ordered by the physician during April 2025. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported that staff frequently failed to provide both prescription and over-the-counter medications, including her antidepressant, pain medication, and inhalers. Review of the medication administration record confirmed that several medications were missed on multiple dates throughout the month, and progress notes indicated these omissions were due to medication unavailability. Staff interviews revealed a lack of a formal system to track and ensure the availability of over-the-counter medications, with communication about shortages occurring only after medications were already missing. The central supply coordinator and unit manager both acknowledged the absence of a tracking system, and the DON stated she relied on staff communication to maintain medication availability. The pharmacy manager confirmed that all medications were refilled as ordered and could not explain the lapses, while the primary care physician was not fully aware of the missed doses. Documentation did not consistently show that the physician was notified when medications were not administered.
Failure to Ensure Timely Physician Review of Pharmacist Drug Regimen Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a physician reviewed and documented actions taken in response to monthly pharmacist recommendations regarding a resident's drug regimen. Over a period of four months, pharmacy consultation reports repeatedly identified that a resident was receiving an antipsychotic medication without adequate documentation of diagnosis or indication for use in the electronic medical record (EMR). Each monthly report recommended updating the EMR with a specific diagnosis, a list of symptoms or target behaviors, evidence that other causes and medications had been considered, documentation of individualized non-pharmacological interventions, and orders for ongoing monitoring. Despite these repeated recommendations, there was no evidence in the resident's record that the physician had reviewed the pharmacist's findings or documented any actions taken to address the identified irregularities. The pharmacy consultation reports for January, February, March, and April all lacked a physician's signature or any indication of review or follow-up. The resident in question had moderate cognitive impairment, mild depression, and was receiving both antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, with care plans in place to monitor for adverse reactions and behavioral symptoms. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that although she received the pharmacist's recommendations each month, she had not distributed them to the physicians for the past four months due to being behind on other tasks. As a result, the required physician review and documentation of actions taken in response to the pharmacist's recommendations did not occur, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Monitor and Document Long-Term Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics and includes a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance. Specifically, for two residents, the facility did not ensure that a physician's rationale for the use of long-term antibiotics was documented, nor was there evidence of ongoing monitoring or reassessment of the continued need for these antibiotics. The facility's own policy required documentation of dose, duration, and indication for each antibiotic, as well as regular reassessment and care planning, but these steps were not followed. For one resident with a history of chronic urinary tract infections and multiple physical impairments, the medical record showed a long-term order for Macrobid as prophylaxis, but the order lacked a specified duration and did not include the physician's rationale for ongoing use. There was also no documentation of monitoring or reassessment of the antibiotic's appropriateness, and the resident's care plan did not address the long-term antibiotic use. Similarly, another resident with a prosthetic knee and multiple comorbidities was prescribed doxycycline prophylactically, but again, the order lacked a duration, rationale, and evidence of monitoring or care planning related to the antibiotic. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of specific monitoring or documentation for residents on long-term antibiotics. The DON acknowledged that while initial assessments and short-term monitoring were performed, there was no ongoing monitoring or monthly reassessment for residents on chronic antibiotics, nor was there documentation of physician justification for continued use. The medical director confirmed that all residents on long-term antibiotics should have an indication, diagnosis, and ongoing monitoring, but this was not reflected in the records for the two affected residents.
Facility Fails to Honor Resident Beverage Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the beverage preferences of three residents, specifically their choice to have soda with their dinner. The facility's policy on resident rights emphasizes the importance of self-determination and accommodating resident preferences unless it poses a safety risk. However, residents reported that they were unable to have soda with their dinner, which was a preference they valued. This restriction made them feel disregarded and upset, as they were only allowed to have soda during lunch and had to save it for dinner if they wanted it at that time. Resident #1, who is cognitively intact and requires maximum assistance with daily activities, expressed sadness over the inability to have soda with dinner, feeling that her preferences were not respected. Similarly, Resident #2, also cognitively intact and requiring significant assistance, felt upset and infantilized by the restriction. Resident #3, who is cognitively intact and requires assistance with toileting and showering, expressed anger over the inability to have soda at dinner, feeling that her autonomy was being undermined. Staff interviews revealed a lack of clarity and consistency regarding the availability of soda. The food service director mentioned that soda was available on beverage carts, but residents reported otherwise. The nursing home administrator acknowledged that soda was not easily accessible and cited concerns about residents hoarding soda as a reason for the restriction. The activities director was unaware of how residents could access soda after the kitchen closed, indicating a gap in communication and policy implementation regarding resident preferences.
Delayed Response to Call Lights Compromises Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were answered in a timely manner, compromising the residents' right to a dignified existence. Interviews and observations revealed that two residents experienced significant delays in receiving assistance after activating their call lights. One resident reported feeling neglected due to long wait times for help, while another resident experienced delays ranging from 30 minutes to three hours. These delays in response made the residents feel uncared for and neglected. Observations conducted on specific dates showed multiple instances where staff members, including the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON), did not respond promptly to activated call lights. In several cases, staff members walked past activated call lights without providing assistance, and call lights remained unanswered for extended periods, ranging from 11 to 14 minutes. Despite the presence of staff members at the nurses' station, including the DON, call lights were not promptly addressed, indicating a systemic issue in responding to residents' needs. Interviews with staff members, including a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), highlighted concerns about inadequate staffing levels to meet residents' needs in a timely manner. The NHA acknowledged the expectation for staff to respond to call lights within 15 minutes but noted that not all staff might be able to assist residents depending on their needs. The NHA also mentioned that staff members would receive verbal warnings if they were observed walking past call lights without checking on residents.
Neglect Leads to Resident Injury Due to Improper Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from neglect, resulting in a serious injury. The resident, who had a history of falls and was dependent on staff for transfers, required the assistance of two staff members and a mechanical lift for safe transfers due to her diagnosis of cerebral palsy. Despite this, an agency CNA attempted to transfer the resident without the mechanical lift, opting instead for a stand and pivot transfer, which was against the resident's care plan. During the unauthorized transfer, the resident's left leg bent under her wheelchair, and she reported hearing popping sounds, indicating an injury. The resident experienced significant pain, and an x-ray initially showed no fractures. However, a subsequent CT scan revealed an acute fracture of the left femur, confirming the resident's injury due to the improper transfer method used by the agency CNA. Interviews with facility staff, including CNAs and the DON, confirmed that the agency CNA did not follow the care plan, which required the use of a mechanical lift with two staff members. The facility's investigation substantiated the neglect allegation, and the agency CNA was barred from returning to the facility. The incident highlighted a failure to adhere to established transfer protocols, resulting in harm to the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 582 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Westminster
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Forest Care Center Llc | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Clear Creek Care Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Arbor View Care Center, Llc | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Village Care And Rehabilitation Center, The | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Arvada Care And Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Life Care Center Of Westminster.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.