Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at South Coast Post Acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not conduct thorough investigations into two separate abuse allegations, as required by policy. In both cases, potential resident witnesses who may have observed the incidents were not interviewed, and there was no documentation explaining the omission. The DON confirmed that these interviews should have been conducted to ensure a complete investigation.
A resident was not adequately prepared for a safe transfer or discharge, and the facility did not ensure that the process met the resident's needs and preferences, resulting in a deficiency related to proper transition planning.
Two residents' Out on Pass Logs were found to have missing entries, including times of departure and return as well as nurse initials, despite facility policy requiring complete and accurate documentation. The DON confirmed that nurses were expected to sign the log, and both the DON and Administrator acknowledged the incomplete records during the survey.
Two residents with histories of aggressive behavior engaged in a physical altercation in their shared room, resulting in minor injuries. Both had documented behavioral issues, including aggression and responding to internal stimuli, and staff were aware of these risks. The facility did not effectively intervene to prevent the incident, as required by its abuse prevention policy.
A resident's medical record lacked a signed admission physician's order in the EHR after readmission and discharge to a hospital. The signed order was not found during review, and when later produced, it was signed after the fact and pre-dated, resulting in inaccurate documentation.
A resident with a documented history of aggressive behavior pushed another resident into a wall after being bumped in the hallway, causing facial injuries and a cervical spine injury. Despite prior incidents and requests for separation, the two residents were not adequately separated, and staff did not intervene effectively to prevent the altercation.
The facility did not report suspected abuse and resident-to-resident altercations to authorities within the required timeframe. Incidents included a resident with visible injuries after alleged physical abuse by staff, another resident reporting verbal abuse by staff, and two residents involved in repeated physical altercations, with one sustaining injuries. Facility leadership acknowledged that these incidents were not reported as required by policy.
The facility did not follow its abuse investigation policies for multiple residents, including failing to remove a staff member accused of assault, not interviewing witnesses, delaying the start of investigations, and not separating residents involved in repeated altercations. These actions resulted in unaddressed allegations and visible injuries among residents.
Surveyors found that the facility did not develop or update care plans for three residents: one with repeated falls and physician-ordered floor mats, another with severe unaddressed weight loss, and a third who sustained facial abrasions after an altercation. The DON and Registered Dietician confirmed that these care needs were not reflected in the residents' care plans.
A resident sustained facial and neck bruising, swelling, and scratches after staff used manual restraint during a de-escalation incident involving aggressive behavior over access to water. Staff and DON confirmed the injuries occurred during a physical struggle when attempts at therapeutic communication failed, and the resident was restrained on the ground.
A LTC facility failed to ensure safe IV therapy for four residents, leading to potential complications. A resident's IV tubing contained air bubbles, another's midline dressing was not labeled or monitored, a third resident's PIV line was not discontinued after therapy, and a fourth's PIV site was undated. These deficiencies risked infection and other complications.
The facility failed to maintain food safety and sanitation standards, with observations of trash and clutter in food preparation areas, unclean equipment, and unlabeled personal food items in residents' rooms. These deficiencies posed a risk of foodborne illnesses for residents consuming food prepared in the facility.
A facility failed to obtain informed consents for the administration of psychotropic medications to a resident upon readmission. The medications, including olanzapine, quetiapine, and valproic acid, were prescribed for managing psychosis and mood lability. Facility staff confirmed the absence of informed consents in the resident's medical record, despite policy requirements for obtaining and verifying consent prior to medication administration.
A facility failed to maintain a copy of a resident's advance directive in their medical record, as required by their policies. Despite the resident having an advance directive, there was no documentation in the medical record, nor evidence of follow-up to obtain it. The Social Services Assistant confirmed the absence of the document and the lack of follow-up documentation, which was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing.
The facility failed to accurately complete PASRR Level 1 assessments for two residents, leading to a risk of inappropriate care. One resident had diagnoses of major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder, with prescriptions for quetiapine and lorazepam, while another had mood disorder and psychosis, with prescriptions for quetiapine and olanzapine. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the errors in the assessments.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was not provided with an individualized and ongoing activity program, as required by the facility's policy. Observations showed the resident lying awake in bed without engagement in preferred activities like watching TV or listening to music. The Activity Director admitted to scheduling room visits only three times a week due to insufficient staff, and the Participation Record showed gaps in activity provision. Interviews confirmed the lack of daily activities for the resident, which was acknowledged by the DON and Administrator.
A resident with severely impaired cognition did not receive proper gastrostomy tube (GT) care as the LVN failed to check GT placement before administering medications and water, contrary to facility policy. The LVN also used improper technique by pushing the syringe's plunger instead of allowing gravity flow, potentially risking complications. The DON acknowledged these findings.
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two residents. A resident's humidifier was not labeled or dated, and there was no physician's order for oxygen use. Another resident received oxygen at a rate exceeding the physician's order. These deficiencies were confirmed by staff and acknowledged by the Administrator.
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services, leading to discrepancies in controlled medication reconciliation for three residents and one medication cart. A resident's oxycodone administration was not documented in the MAR, another resident's digoxin was administered without checking the apical pulse, and a medication cart had missing narcotic shift count signatures. Additionally, a resident's medication count sheets were inaccurately maintained, with errors in tablet strength and missing co-signatures for wastage.
The facility failed to monitor two residents for the use of psychotropic medications. One resident was not monitored for orthostatic blood pressure as ordered, with identical readings suggesting incorrect documentation. Another resident was given quetiapine without documented non-pharmacological interventions or behavioral monitoring, and no AIMS assessment was completed. These actions did not adhere to the facility's policies, potentially impacting the residents' well-being.
A facility's medication error rate was found to be 25.93%, significantly above the acceptable threshold. An LVN administered medications via GT with residue left in cups and used the wrong form of Keppra. An RN prepared an IV antibiotic with air bubbles in the tubing, requiring intervention to ensure safe administration. Both staff acknowledged the errors.
The facility failed to properly store, label, and dispose of medications, with expired items found in Medication Rooms A and C, and Medication Cart B. Treatment Carts A and B also contained expired items and cleanliness issues. These deficiencies were verified by LVNs and acknowledged by the DON.
The facility failed to properly dispose of waste, with food residues and trash found near dumpsters and in storage areas, posing pest risks. Two soiled linen barrels were uncovered and overfilled with trash, contrary to facility policy requiring tight-fitting lids. The Maintenance Director and Administrator acknowledged these deficiencies.
The facility failed to implement proper infection control practices, including the use of PPE and hand hygiene during medication administration for residents with indwelling medical devices. Additionally, a shared restroom was found to be unsanitary, posing a risk for infection transmission. These deficiencies were acknowledged by facility staff.
The facility failed to document medication administration for two residents, leading to incomplete medical records. A resident's piperacillin-tazobactam administration was not recorded on multiple occasions, and another resident's monitoring for antipsychotic side effects and schizoaffective disorder episodes was not documented. These lapses were confirmed by staff and acknowledged by the DON and Administrator.
A resident in an LTC facility was physically abused by another resident, resulting in a broken nose and a subdural hematoma. The incident occurred when the aggressor punched the victim in the face, leading to significant injuries. Despite the facility's policy against abuse, the aggressor, who had a history of aggression, was found with blood on his knuckles and admitted to the act. The victim was cognitively intact and required hospital evaluation for his injuries.
A resident with cirrhosis and fractures experienced inadequate care after developing swelling and abdominal issues post-IV fluids. The facility failed to assess and monitor the resident's condition upon return from the hospital, did not obtain weekly weights as ordered, and lacked a comprehensive care plan. Interviews with staff confirmed the absence of necessary assessments and documentation, leading to the deficiency.
The facility failed to implement proper infection control practices by not properly storing and labeling personal hygiene items such as bedpans, basins, and urinals. Unlabeled items were found in restrooms occupied by multiple residents, posing a risk of cross-contamination. The DON confirmed these findings, indicating a lapse in adherence to the facility's infection prevention and control policies.
A resident experienced significant unplanned weight loss, dropping from 115 lbs to 89 lbs over several months. Despite recommendations to monitor lab tests and weights, no lab work was ordered or completed, and no further IDT meetings were held after March. The resident was dependent on staff for eating and consumed only 50% to 70% of meals. Interviews confirmed the weight loss and lack of lab work, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's weight management policy.
The facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices, as staff did not wear disposable gowns or perform proper hand hygiene during care for a resident under Enhanced Standard Precautions. Staff misunderstood policy requirements, leading to lapses during wound care and feeding activities, which were confirmed by the Infection Preventionist.
A resident developed a Stage 4 pressure ulcer on the right buttock after admission. The facility did not follow the physician's wound care orders, which included applying Santyl ointment and packing with xeroform gauze. An LVN failed to pack the wound as ordered, and the DON acknowledged the need to follow physician's orders.
The facility failed to ensure timely responses to residents' call lights, affecting four residents' dignity and well-being. Residents reported waiting over 30 minutes to an hour for assistance, particularly during shift changes and evenings. Staff interviews revealed systemic issues, including late assignments and lack of support from non-nursing staff, contributing to the delays.
The facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for two residents by not responding to call lights in a timely manner. One resident waited for assistance after a bowel movement, and another was not informed of the wait time for a transfer back to bed. Multiple staff members failed to address the call lights promptly.
The facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were administered as per the physician's order due to unavailability. An LPN borrowed medication from another resident's supply, and the pharmacy did not deliver a prescribed medication. There was no documentation of physician notification or refill requests, and the MAR was signed for a medication that was not administered.
The facility failed to ensure a resident's physician's order for Seroquel had a diagnosis justifying its use, did not implement nonpharmacological interventions prior to drug use, and did not monitor targeted behavior and side-effects. The resident, diagnosed with dementia, was administered Seroquel following a fall without proper documentation or adherence to facility policy.
A facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy, resulting in the resident being exposed and visible from the hallway. The resident had requested assistance after a bowel movement but was left uncovered. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility's policy on dignity and privacy was not followed.
Failure to Conduct Thorough Abuse Investigations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate abuse allegations involving two residents. In the first incident, a resident alleged being struck on the face by another resident. Although both residents were separated and the alleged victim received first aid, the facility did not interview the alleged victim's roommate, who was present in the room and could have been a witness. There was no documentation explaining why this potential witness was not interviewed, and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the interview should have occurred. In the second incident, another resident was struck on the back of the neck by a peer while waiting in the patio. Although staff intervened and separated the residents, the facility did not interview other residents who were present and may have witnessed the event. The DON acknowledged that these potential witnesses were not interviewed, stating that staff relied on their own observations. In both cases, the facility's investigation documentation did not include interviews with all possible witnesses as required by policy.
Failure to Ensure Resident-Centered and Safe Transfer/Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the transfer or discharge process met the resident's needs and preferences, and did not adequately prepare the resident for a safe transfer or discharge. The report identifies that the necessary steps to assess and address the resident's individual requirements and preferences during the transfer or discharge process were not followed, resulting in a deficiency related to resident-centered care and safe transition planning.
Incomplete Documentation on Resident Out on Pass Logs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Resident Out on Pass Log was accurately and completely filled out for two of four sampled residents. For both residents, multiple entries on the Out on Pass Log were missing critical information, including the time the resident went out, the time they returned to the facility, and the nurse's initials. These omissions were identified through a review of the medical records and facility documents, which showed repeated instances where required documentation was left blank on several dates for both residents. Facility policy requires that nursing documentation be concise, clear, pertinent, and accurate, and that all resident information be entered in the appropriate section of the clinical record following established guidelines. The Out on Pass policy further specifies that residents or their responsible persons must sign out and back in on the log, and that nurses are to sign the entries. During interviews, the DON confirmed that the logs for the two residents had blank entries and acknowledged that nurses were supposed to sign the log. The Administrator and DON both acknowledged these findings during the survey.
Failure to Prevent Resident-on-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect two residents from abuse, resulting in a physical altercation between them in their shared room. Both residents alleged that the other initiated the altercation and admitted to hitting each other in the face in self-defense. Staff assessments found one resident with a small abrasion on the lip and the other with a swollen lip. The facility's policy on abuse prevention required staff to identify, correct, and intervene in situations where abuse is more likely to occur, including understanding behavioral symptoms that may increase the risk of abuse. Medical record reviews revealed that one resident had a documented history of physically aggressive and assaultive behaviors, including multiple incidents of verbal threats, striking staff, punching walls, and previously striking another resident. The other resident also had a care plan for aggressive behavior, with documented episodes of agitation, responding to internal stimuli, threatening staff, and physical aggression such as punching walls and plexiglass. Interviews with facility leadership and the residents confirmed ongoing behavioral issues, including command hallucinations and medication changes that may have contributed to escalating behaviors prior to the altercation.
Failure to Maintain Accurate and Complete Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of a resident's medical record by not maintaining a signed copy of the admission physician's orders in the electronic health record (EHR). Upon review, it was found that after the resident was readmitted and subsequently discharged to an acute care hospital, the signed Order Summary Report was missing from the EHR. The Health Information Manager (HIM) confirmed that paper records are shredded after scanning, and the signed order should have been present in the EHR but was not. Later, a signed Order Summary Report was produced by the Medical Records Clerk, but the physician confirmed he had signed it only that morning, despite the document being pre-dated. This sequence of events resulted in the resident's medical record containing inaccurate and incomplete information at the time of review.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Abuse Resulting in Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from abuse, resulting in one resident sustaining multiple injuries after being pushed by another resident. The incident occurred when one resident, who had a documented history of aggressive and assaultive behaviors, reacted to being bumped in the hallway by forcefully pushing the other resident into a wall, causing an abrasion to the forehead and a laceration to the left eyelid. The injured resident required assessment and was sent to an acute care hospital for further evaluation, where imaging revealed a cervical spine injury. Prior to the incident, the aggressive resident had a known history of similar behaviors, including previous assaults on peers at both the current and prior facilities. Documentation indicated that this resident had been placed on 1:1 supervision in the past due to high risk for violence and had requested a unit change, expressing ongoing frustration with the other resident's behavior. Despite these known risks and repeated requests for separation, the two residents were not adequately separated, and the aggressive resident was not moved to another unit. Staff interviews and medical record reviews confirmed that the aggressive resident had previously assaulted the same peer and had communicated intentions to harm if the situation persisted. The facility's policies required identification and intervention in situations where abuse was likely, as well as immediate reporting and investigation of such incidents. However, the facility did not implement sufficient measures to prevent further altercations, resulting in the resident's injuries.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse and Resident Altercations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely reporting of suspected abuse, neglect, or theft, as well as the results of investigations, to the appropriate authorities for four out of ten sampled residents. According to the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy, allegations of abuse must be reported within two hours of the allegation being made. However, in multiple instances, this policy was not followed, resulting in delayed notifications to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Licensing & Certification (L&C) Program and local law enforcement. One incident involved a resident who alleged physical abuse by a mental health worker (MHW), stating that the staff member choked and slammed the resident's face into the ground. The resident was observed with visible injuries, including bruising and scratches. The DON acknowledged the incident and confirmed that the reporting was not completed within the required timeframe. In another case, a resident reported verbal abuse by a staff member who mocked his stutter and made derogatory comments. The DON was informed of the allegation but did not report it within the mandated period. Additionally, the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation in which one resident admitted to physically assaulting another on two separate occasions. Both residents were cognitively intact and had psychiatric diagnoses. The second incident resulted in visible injuries to the assaulted resident, and interviews revealed that the first incident had not been reported as required. Facility leadership acknowledged these reporting failures during interviews.
Failure to Implement Abuse Investigation Policies and Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its abuse investigation policies and procedures for four of ten sampled residents. In one case, a resident alleged that a mental health worker (MHW) choked and assaulted him, resulting in visible injuries such as bruising and scratches on the face and neck. Despite the allegation and physical evidence, the MHW was not immediately removed from duty, and no investigation was conducted. Other residents who witnessed the incident were not interviewed, and the DON dismissed the allegation as false without following the required investigative process. Another resident reported that a staff member mocked his stutter and that other staff called him derogatory names. The DON acknowledged the allegation but did not initiate an investigation or report the incident within the required two-hour timeframe. The facility later submitted a report, but it was acknowledged as late by the Administrator and DON. Additionally, two residents were involved in two separate physical altercations, with one resident sustaining visible injuries. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after the first incident, did not report the initial allegation, and did not separate the residents until after the second incident. Interviews revealed that staff and residents were aware of the altercations, but appropriate actions to ensure safety and compliance with policy were not taken. The DON and Administrator acknowledged these failures during interviews.
Failure to Develop and Revise Comprehensive Care Plans for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed and revised as required for three residents. For one resident with a history of falls and a physician's order for bilateral floor mats, the care plan did not include this intervention, despite documented falls and the presence of the mats during observation. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the care plan lacked this intervention. Another resident experienced a significant, unplanned weight loss of 24 lbs (17.91%) over a period of less than three months. Although the resident's care plan noted a nutritional problem, it did not address the severe weight loss, and both the Registered Dietician and DON acknowledged the omission. A third resident, who was cognitively intact, sustained facial abrasions following a physical altercation. While the care plan identified the resident as a victim of assault, it did not include interventions for the facial injuries. The DON confirmed that there was no care plan or interventions for the injuries, and agreed that the injuries represented a change in condition. The Administrator and DON acknowledged these findings during the survey.
Resident Injured During Manual Restraint in De-escalation Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from injury during a de-escalation process, resulting in the resident sustaining multiple bruises and scratches to the face and neck. According to the facility's policy, the least restrictive method should be used to resolve situations, with manual restraint reserved for acute episodes of dangerous behavior. On the date of the incident, the resident became verbally aggressive and attempted to pour out a community water jug. Staff attempted therapeutic communication, which was unsuccessful, and the situation escalated to physical contact. During the struggle, the resident and staff fell to the ground, and staff manually restrained the resident by holding his limbs until he calmed down. Medical examination documented small bruises on the resident's left eyebrow and neck, as well as bruising and swelling around the nose bridge and a scratch on the forehead. Observations confirmed these injuries, and the resident reported being taken to the ground, choked, and having his head smashed into the ground by staff. Staff interviews corroborated that a physical altercation occurred, resulting in the resident being restrained on the ground. The DON confirmed that the injuries were not present upon admission and occurred during the incident on the patio.
IV Therapy Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safe administration and maintenance of intravenous (IV) therapy for four residents, leading to potential complications. Resident 932's IV tubing contained multiple air bubbles, which were not removed before the administration of the antibiotic Zosyn. Despite attempts by RN 1 and the QA RN to remove the air bubbles, they were unsuccessful, and it was recommended to change the IV tubing. This oversight posed a risk of air embolism to the resident. Resident 184's midline dressing was not dated or labeled, and there was no documentation of the midline site being monitored for patency or complications such as infection or displacement. The resident was receiving IV medication for a foot infection, but the lack of proper labeling and monitoring could lead to catheter-related infections. Additionally, there was no evidence of a physician's order for flushing the midline to maintain its patency. Resident 983 had a peripheral IV (PIV) line that was not discontinued after the completion of antibiotic therapy, and there was no physician's order for maintenance flushes. The PIV line remained in place without a clear indication, increasing the risk of infection. Similarly, Resident 733's PIV site was not dated or labeled, which is necessary for infection control and to ensure timely site changes. These deficiencies highlight the facility's failure to adhere to IV therapy protocols, potentially compromising resident safety.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to food safety and sanitation guidelines, as evidenced by multiple observations of unsanitary conditions in the kitchen and food preparation areas. White plastic trash was found on the floor, in the sink area, and in the main food preparation hallway. Additionally, gloves and dietary menu forms were improperly placed in clean serving areas. The top surface of the soup machine was cluttered with unwashed cabbages, cooking mittens, basins, and a cutting board, which should have been cleared. Vegetables that fell on the floor were picked up and placed on a food cart without being cleaned, posing a risk of contamination. Further observations revealed that equipment and utensils were not properly cleaned. Fryer baskets and a serving utensil had food residues, and a can opener had brownish-orange residues. Microwaves used by residents in various stations had dried food residues, and the Station 4 refrigerator had food residue and a dried brown liquid spill. The lack of an air gap in the kitchen sink also violated sanitation guidelines, as it could lead to backflow contamination. Personal food items stored in residents' rooms were found unlabeled and undated, which is against the facility's policy. Residents 205, 222, and 133 had food items in their rooms that were not labeled with the resident's name, date brought, or use-by date, increasing the risk of food contamination. These deficiencies in food safety and sanitation practices posed a risk for foodborne illnesses among the residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain informed consents for the administration of psychotropic medications to a resident, identified as Resident 147, who was readmitted to the facility. The medications in question were olanzapine, quetiapine, and valproic acid, which were prescribed for managing psychosis and mood lability. The facility's policy and procedure required that informed consent be obtained by the prescriber prior to the initiation of psychotropic medication and verified by the facility before administration. However, upon review, it was found that no informed consents were obtained for these medications upon the resident's readmission. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN, the Health Information Manager, and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the absence of informed consents in the resident's medical record. The Health Information Manager noted that new orders and informed consents are required if a resident is readmitted after a week from an acute care hospital. The DON acknowledged the findings and stated that informed consent must be obtained for each psychotropic medication prior to its initiation. This oversight had the potential to leave the resident unaware of the risks associated with the medications, which could have adverse side effects detrimental to the resident's well-being.
Failure to Maintain Advance Directive in Resident's Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a copy of an advance directive in the medical record for one of the residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficiency was identified during a review of the facility's policies and procedures, which stated that a copy of the advance directive should be maintained as part of the resident's medical record. The review of Resident 184's medical record revealed that although the resident had an advance directive, there was no copy of it in the medical record, nor was there any documentation indicating that the facility had requested a copy from the resident or their representative. Interviews and concurrent medical record reviews with the Social Services Assistant (SSA) confirmed the absence of the advance directive in the resident's medical record and the lack of documentation regarding any follow-up actions to obtain it. The SSA acknowledged that the facility's procedure was to request a copy of the advance directive and to document any follow-up actions if the resident or their representative could not provide it. However, no such documentation was available for Resident 184. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of these findings and acknowledged the deficiency.
Inaccurate PASRR Level 1 Assessments for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate completion of the PASRR Level 1 assessments for two residents, which is a federal requirement to prevent inappropriate placement in nursing homes. Resident 132's PASRR Level 1 Screening Form indicated no serious mental illness and no prescribed psychotropic medications, despite the resident having diagnoses of major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder. The resident's medical records showed prescriptions for quetiapine and lorazepam, which are used to manage symptoms of these conditions. Similarly, Resident 147's PASRR Level 1 Screening Form also inaccurately indicated no serious mental illness and no prescribed psychotropic medications. However, the resident had diagnoses of mood disorder and psychosis, with medical records showing prescriptions for quetiapine and olanzapine to manage symptoms such as hallucinations and agitation. The MDS Coordinator confirmed these discrepancies and acknowledged the errors in the PASRR Level 1 assessments, which posed a risk of the residents not receiving appropriate specialized care and services.
Failure to Provide Individualized Activity Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests of a resident, identified as Resident 147, which potentially affected the resident's psychosocial well-being. Observations on multiple occasions revealed Resident 147 lying awake in bed, staring at the wall, with the television turned off, indicating a lack of engagement in preferred activities. The resident's medical records indicated severe cognitive impairment and dependency on staff for activities of daily living. The Recreation Comprehensive Assessment highlighted the importance of engaging the resident in activities such as watching TV, exercising, and listening to music, yet these preferences were not consistently met. The facility's policy stated that residents should be encouraged to choose activities based on their preferences and medical conditions, but the Activity Director admitted that due to insufficient staff, the resident was only scheduled for room visits three times a week. The Participation Record for February showed gaps in activity provision, with no activities recorded on several days. Interviews with the Activity Director and a CNA confirmed the lack of daily activities for the resident, with the CNA noting that the resident was unable to attend the activity room and had not received in-room activities. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator acknowledged these findings.
Failure in GT Care and Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary gastrostomy tube (GT) care and services for a resident, identified as Resident 735, who was part of the final sample. The deficiency was observed during a medication administration session where the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not check the GT placement before administering medications and water. This was contrary to the facility's policy and procedure, which required checking the tube placement by inserting air and listening for gurgling sounds, as well as aspirating stomach contents. The LVN acknowledged the oversight and stated that the check would be done later, which was not in compliance with the established protocol. Additionally, the LVN administered medications and water flushes by pushing the syringe's plunger instead of allowing them to flow via gravity, as required by the facility's procedures. This improper technique could potentially lead to complications such as tube dislodgement or trauma. The resident involved, Resident 735, had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating an inability to understand and make decisions. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of these findings and acknowledged the issues.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. For Resident 96, the facility did not ensure that the humidifier was labeled and dated, and there was no documented physician's order for the use of oxygen, as required by the facility's policies and procedures. During an observation, it was noted that Resident 96 was using oxygen without a physician's order, and the humidifier was not properly labeled. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) confirmed these findings and acknowledged the need for a physician's order for oxygen use. For Resident 161, the facility did not adhere to the physician's order for oxygen administration. The order specified that oxygen should be administered at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula, with the possibility to titrate up to 3 liters per minute. However, during an observation, Resident 161 was found to be receiving oxygen at 5 liters per minute, which exceeded the physician's order. The Infection Preventionist (IP) verified this discrepancy, and the Administrator acknowledged the findings. These failures had the potential to impact the respiratory health and well-being of the residents.
Pharmaceutical Service Deficiencies in Medication Reconciliation and Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services, resulting in discrepancies in the reconciliation of controlled medications for three residents and one medication cart. For Resident 40, the facility did not ensure that the administration of oxycodone-acetaminophen was accurately documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR), despite being signed out on the controlled drug record. This discrepancy was verified by both a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and the Director of Nursing (DON), who acknowledged the lack of documentation for the administered doses. Resident 735, who had severe cognitive impairment, was prescribed digoxin with a specific order to hold the medication if the apical pulse was below 60 beats per minute. However, the LVN administering the medication failed to obtain the apical pulse before administration, as required by the physician's order. This oversight was confirmed during an observation and interview with the LVN. Additionally, the facility did not maintain accurate narcotic shift counts for Medication Cart A, with a missing signature for a specific shift. For Resident 27, the facility failed to maintain accurate controlled medication count sheets, leading to discrepancies in the documentation of oxycodone administration and wastage. The DON confirmed that the count sheets were incorrectly maintained, with errors in tablet strength and missing co-signatures for medication wastage.
Failure to Monitor Psychotropic Medication Use and Implement Non-Pharmacological Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper monitoring and implementation of non-pharmacological interventions for two residents receiving psychotropic medications. Resident 146 was not monitored for orthostatic blood pressure as ordered by the physician, despite being administered quetiapine fumarate for psychosis. The medical records showed that the orthostatic blood pressure readings were identical for lying and sitting positions, which is unlikely and suggests incorrect documentation or monitoring. This lack of proper monitoring could not confirm whether Resident 146 experienced orthostatic hypotension. Resident 147 was administered quetiapine without documented evidence of non-pharmacological interventions being attempted first, as required by the facility's policy. Additionally, there was no behavioral monitoring or AIMS assessment completed after the resident's readmission, which is necessary to evaluate the effects and necessity of the psychotropic medication. Interviews with facility staff confirmed these findings, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's policies on psychotropic medication use. The facility's policy requires that psychotropic medications be used only after non-drug approaches have been attempted and that residents' behaviors be monitored. The failure to follow these protocols for Residents 146 and 147 had the potential to negatively impact their well-being, as the necessary assessments and interventions were not conducted to ensure the safe and appropriate use of psychotropic medications.
Medication Administration Errors Lead to High Error Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with an observed rate of 25.93%. During a medication administration observation, LVN 3 administered medications to a resident via a gastrostomy tube (GT) and left residue in the medication cups, indicating incorrect dosage administration. Additionally, LVN 3 did not follow the physician's order for the form of Keppra, administering a solution instead of the prescribed tablet. LVN 3 acknowledged these errors and stated that the order should have been updated in the electronic health record (EHR) upon receiving a different medication form from the pharmacy. RN 1 was observed preparing and administering an intravenous (IV) antibiotic, Zosyn, to another resident. During the process, multiple air bubbles were found in the IV tubing, which RN 1 initially attempted to remove by priming the tubing, risking medication waste. The QA RN and DON 1 were consulted, and it was decided to replace the IV tubing to ensure safe administration. RN 1 acknowledged the error and stated that a new Zosyn and tubing should have been prepared to prevent the medication error.
Medication Storage and Disposal Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage, labeling, and disposal of medications, as observed during inspections of various medication and treatment areas. In Medication Room A, expired vancomycin bags were found in the refrigerator, and bisacodyl suppositories were stored without an open date. Additionally, the refrigerator's temperature was significantly below the recommended range. In Medication Room C, several expired medications, including clotrimazole cream and various vitamins, were not discarded. Medication Cart B contained an expired bottle of vitamin C liquid. Further deficiencies were noted in Treatment Carts A and B. Treatment Cart A contained an opened bottle of sterile saline, expired antifungal powder, and culture swabs, along with unclean conditions in the last drawer. Treatment Cart B also had expired antifungal powder and shampoo, with similar cleanliness issues. These findings were verified by the respective LVNs present during the inspections, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the issues upon being informed.
Improper Waste Disposal and Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the proper disposal and handling of waste, leading to potential safety and pest contamination risks. Observations revealed scattered food residues on the ground next to the food waste dumpster and trash, including disposable cups with orange liquid and tortilla plastic containers, in the open space storage area. These areas were not maintained in accordance with the USDA Food Code 2022, which requires refuse to be stored in a manner that is inaccessible to insects and rodents. The Maintenance Director confirmed these findings and acknowledged that the surrounding areas of the dumpster should be clear of trash to prevent pest attraction. Additionally, two of the six soiled linen barrels were found with trash inside, uncovered, and without lids. One barrel was overfilled with trash bags, and the other contained two bags of trash with a milky substance spilled at the bottom. The Maintenance Director stated that these barrels were intended for trash and were not covered because the trash was placed in plastic bags. The facility's policy requires all garbage and refuse containers to have tight-fitting lids or covers, which were not adhered to in this instance. The Administrator and DON acknowledged these findings, indicating a lapse in compliance with established waste management protocols.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Medication Administration and Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices for several residents, leading to potential risks of infection transmission. For Resident 184, who had a midline catheter, the facility did not ensure that the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) wore the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves and gowns during medication administration. This was despite the resident's need for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to the presence of an indwelling medical device. Additionally, there was no EBP sign outside the resident's room to indicate the need for such precautions. In other instances, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during medication administration. LVN 5 did not perform hand hygiene before and after donning and doffing gloves while administering eye medication to Resident 151. Similarly, LVN 3 did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and before preparing medication cups for Resident 735. Furthermore, RN 1 did not disinfect the septum of a Zosyn antibiotic vial before connecting it to a normal saline bag for Resident 932, which is a critical step in preventing contamination and infection. The facility also neglected to maintain a sanitary environment in shared restrooms. Residents 64 and 118's shared restroom had a strong foul odor, and the toilet rim was visibly soiled with dried yellow urine. This lack of cleanliness poses a risk for the transmission of disease-causing microorganisms. These observations were verified by staff members, including the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Maintenance Director, who acknowledged the deficiencies in infection control practices.
Incomplete Documentation of Medication Administration for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure complete documentation of medication administration for two residents, leading to potential gaps in their care. For Resident 184, the administration of piperacillin-tazobactam was not documented on several occasions, including specific times on 2/16/25, 2/17/25, 2/18/25, and 2/26/25. RN 1 admitted to administering the medication on 2/26/25 but failed to document it, and there was no explanation for the missing documentation on the other dates. The pharmacist confirmed that there should have been eight doses left if the medication had been administered as ordered, which was verified by RN 1 during an observation of the IV cart. For Resident 132, the facility failed to document monitoring for antipsychotic side effects and episodes of schizoaffective disorder as ordered by the physician on 1/13/25 during the evening shift. The orders included monitoring for side effects of quetiapine and documenting non-pharmacological interventions for schizoaffective disorder. RN Supervisor 1 confirmed the missing documentation and stated that the monitoring was performed but not recorded in the MAR. These documentation failures were acknowledged by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator, indicating a lapse in adherence to the facility's policies and procedures for medication administration and documentation. The lack of complete medical records for these residents could potentially impact the quality of care provided, as the clinical information was not fully captured.
Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by another resident, resulting in significant injuries. Resident 1 was punched in the face by Resident 2, leading to a broken nose, bruising around the left eye, and a subdural hematoma. The incident occurred when Resident 1 was in his room, and staff heard him yelling. Upon investigation, Resident 1 accused Resident 2 of hitting him, which was corroborated by the presence of blood on Resident 2's knuckles and bed. Resident 1 was cognitively intact and had the capacity to make medical decisions. After the incident, Resident 1 was transferred to an acute care hospital for further evaluation, where a CT scan confirmed multiple nasal bone fractures and a subdural hematoma. Resident 2, who was also cognitively intact, had a history of physical and verbal aggression, as noted in his care plan. Despite denying the assault, Resident 2 was found with blood on his knuckles, and another resident confirmed that Resident 2 admitted to hitting Resident 1 because he would not be quiet. The facility's policy prohibits abuse of any kind, yet the incident highlights a failure to protect residents from harm. Interviews with staff and residents confirmed the sequence of events, and the facility's documentation supported the findings. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator acknowledged the incident and the associated findings during a review of the medical records.
Failure to Monitor and Document Resident's Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate care and monitoring for a resident, identified as Resident 4, who was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified fractures and cirrhosis of the liver. After receiving intravenous fluids, Resident 4 developed bilateral lower extremity swelling and was transferred to the hospital for abdominal pain and increased abdominal girth. Upon returning to the facility, the staff failed to assess and monitor the resident's swelling and abdominal girth, and did not obtain weekly weights as ordered by the physician. These omissions were contrary to the facility's policies and procedures for weight management and nursing documentation. The facility's policies required baseline weight measurements and ongoing monitoring, especially when a resident's condition warranted it. However, Resident 4's weight was not consistently recorded, with only two entries documented despite physician orders for weekly monitoring. Additionally, the facility's nursing documentation policy emphasized the need for clear and timely documentation of a resident's condition and interventions, which was not adhered to in this case. The lack of a comprehensive care plan addressing Resident 4's cirrhosis, abdominal pain, and edema further contributed to the deficiency. Interviews with facility staff, including RN 1 and the DON, confirmed that a change in condition assessment was not completed for Resident 4's symptoms following the administration of IV fluids. The staff acknowledged that such assessments are crucial for alerting nurses to monitor residents for 72 hours to determine if symptoms improve or worsen. The physician also expected the facility to assess and monitor the resident's condition upon return from the hospital, which was not done. The failure to follow through with these assessments and documentation led to inadequate care for Resident 4.
Infection Control Deficiency Due to Improper Storage and Labeling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement proper infection control practices, as evidenced by the improper storage and labeling of personal hygiene items such as bedpans, basins, and urinals. During an initial tour, surveyors observed two unlabeled bedpans and one unlabeled basin in the restroom of Room A, which was occupied by two residents. Additionally, an unlabeled basin was found touching the clean toilet paper seat dispenser in Room B, occupied by four residents. In Room C, an unlabeled urinal was placed on top of the toilet tank, with two residents occupying the room. These observations were verified by the Director of Nursing (DON), who acknowledged that all bedpans, basins, and urinals should be properly stored and labeled to prevent cross-contamination. The facility's policies and procedures for infection prevention and control, as well as the protection of residents' personal property, were not adhered to, leading to potential risks of cross-contamination and the spread of infections among residents.
Failure to Monitor and Address Resident's Nutritional Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) effectively evaluated and monitored the nutritional status of a resident who experienced significant unplanned weight loss. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis including a pressure injury, showed a progressive weight loss from January to April, dropping from 115 lbs to 89 lbs. Despite the IDT's recommendation to monitor laboratory tests and weights, there was no evidence of laboratory work being ordered or completed from March to April, and no further IDT meetings were conducted after March to address the weight loss. Observations revealed that the resident was dependent on staff for eating and consumed only 50% to 70% of meals. Interviews with the registered dietician (RD) and the director of nursing (DON) confirmed the significant weight loss and the lack of laboratory work. The facility's policy on weight management required collaboration and action in the event of significant weight changes, which was not adhered to, leading to the deficiency in maintaining the resident's nutritional status.
Infection Control Lapses in Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by staff not adhering to Enhanced Standard/Barrier Precautions for a resident. Specifically, staff did not wear disposable gowns when providing care to a resident who required such precautions due to an order for Enhanced Standard Precaution. This was observed during wound care and feeding activities, where staff members did not don the necessary protective equipment, despite clear signage and policy requirements. Interviews with staff revealed a misunderstanding of the policy, with one staff member incorrectly believing gowns were only necessary for residents with tubes or catheters. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices were followed during wound care procedures. A staff member was observed changing gloves multiple times without performing hand hygiene in between, which is a critical step in preventing the spread of infections. These observations were confirmed through interviews with the involved staff and the facility's Infection Preventionist, who acknowledged the lapses in following the established infection control protocols.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent the development or worsening of pressure injuries for a resident. The resident developed a Stage 4 pressure injury to the right buttock after admission. The facility did not adhere to the physician's order for wound care, which included applying Santyl ointment, cleansing with normal saline, patting dry, packing lightly with xeroform gauze, and covering with a dry dressing every day shift for 30 days. During an observation, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) cleaned the wound and applied Santyl ointment but failed to pack the wound with xeroform gauze as ordered. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that wound care should be performed as per the physician's orders.
Delayed Response to Call Lights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents' call lights were answered in a timely manner, which compromised the dignity and respect of four nonsampled residents. Resident A reported that it usually took more than 45 minutes for staff to respond to her call light, leaving her uncomfortable in a wet diaper. Resident B experienced delays of over an hour during shift changes or evenings, particularly when needing assistance with transfers. Resident C also reported waiting more than 30 minutes to an hour for diaper changes during the evening shift. Resident D stated that she sometimes waited more than an hour for assistance during the night shift, which upset her as she needed help with colostomy care after a bowel movement. Interviews with staff revealed systemic issues contributing to the delays. CNA 1 mentioned the challenge of attending to multiple residents needing total care simultaneously. LVN 1 indicated that he and the CNAs often received their assignments late, making it difficult to respond to call lights promptly. The DSD confirmed that the schedules for the 3 pm to 11 pm shifts were missing, and the staff coordinator was unavailable to address the issue. The Director of Activity acknowledged that residents had raised concerns about call light delays during a resident council meeting, but there was no documentation of follow-up actions. Further interviews with CNAs and RNs highlighted additional problems. CNAs 3, 4, and 5 noted that they received their assignments late and could not see call lights in other stations when busy with their assigned residents. They also mentioned that non-nursing staff and some charge nurses did not assist with answering call lights, even for non-nursing tasks. RN 1 stated that the next shift staff might not have their schedules, causing delays in care as the RN on duty had to remake the schedules. These systemic issues led to significant delays in responding to residents' call lights, negatively affecting their physical and emotional well-being.
Failure to Timely Respond to Call Lights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the care needs of two residents regarding the timely response to call lights. For Resident 1, the call light was observed to be on for an extended period without being answered. Despite multiple staff members passing by the room, the call light remained on until a CNA finally responded. Resident 1 reported that she had pressed the call light button because she needed assistance after a bowel movement and had been waiting for a long time without any staff coming to assist her. The PT who had checked the room earlier did not notice the call light was on, and the LVN confirmed that everyone was responsible for answering call lights, but the system failed in this instance. For Resident 3, the call light was answered by the MDS Coordinator, who turned off the light and informed the LVN that the resident needed to be transferred back to bed. However, the MDS Coordinator did not inform Resident 3 of the expected wait time for assistance. The LVN did not communicate with Resident 3 about the delay or seek alternative assistance, resulting in the resident waiting without knowing when help would arrive. The Administrator and DON acknowledged these findings and confirmed that call lights should be answered immediately by any available staff member.
Medication Administration Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 2's medications were administered as per the physician's order due to a lack of availability of the medications. LVN 1 did not ensure that Resident 2's Lasix supply was available for scheduled administration and borrowed the medication from another resident's supply. Additionally, the pharmacy failed to deliver Resident 2's prescribed Entresto medication, and there was no documented evidence that the physician was notified of the missed doses from 4/17 to 4/19/24. Furthermore, LVN 1 signed the MAR indicating that Refresh Tears ophthalmic solution was administered to Resident 2, although it was not actually given. These failures posed a risk for negative health outcomes for Resident 2. During the medication administration observation, LVN 1 acknowledged that Resident 2's Entresto medication was not available and planned to follow up with the pharmacy after the medication pass. LVN 1 also admitted to borrowing Lasix from another resident's supply to administer to Resident 2. The medical record review confirmed that Resident 2 was not administered Entresto as ordered by the physician and that there was no documentation of a refill request or physician notification regarding the unavailability of the medication. The pharmacist confirmed that the Entresto supply was not delivered due to a potential drug allergy and lack of response from the facility for clarification. Interviews with LVN 1 and the DON revealed that the licensed nurses were responsible for following up with the pharmacy, checking the E-kit, and notifying the physician if a medication was unavailable. However, there was no documentation to show that these steps were taken for Resident 2's Lasix and Entresto medications. Additionally, LVN 1 admitted to signing the MAR for Refresh Tears eye drops without administering them. The DON acknowledged the findings and stated that the facility was working with a new pharmacy and had issues with their fax machine and electronic physician's orders integration.
Failure to Justify and Monitor Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 2's physician's order for Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication, had a diagnosis justifying its use. Additionally, the facility did not implement nonpharmacological interventions prior to the drug use, nor did it monitor the targeted behavior and side-effects of the medication. These failures were identified through interviews, medical record reviews, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures. The facility's policy mandates a holistic approach to behavior management, including thorough assessments and non-drug interventions before resorting to psychotropic medications. However, these steps were not followed for Resident 2, who was administered Seroquel for restlessness without documented evidence of a proper diagnosis or prior nonpharmacological interventions. Resident 2, who was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia and no capacity to make decisions, experienced a fall on 4/17/24. Following this incident, an on-call physician recommended starting Seroquel 12.5 mg with the family's consent. Despite this recommendation, the medical record lacked documentation of a diagnosis justifying the use of Seroquel, nonpharmacological interventions, and monitoring of targeted behavior and side-effects. Interviews with LVN 1 and RN 1 confirmed these findings, indicating that the necessary steps were not taken before administering the medication. The Administrator and DON were informed and acknowledged these deficiencies.
Failure to Ensure Resident Privacy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the privacy of a resident, leading to a violation of the resident's right to dignity and privacy. During an initial tour, the resident was observed lying in bed with their lower extremities and adult brief exposed and visible from the hallway. The resident had pressed the call light for assistance after a bowel movement but had not received help for an extended period. The resident expressed discomfort and embarrassment about being exposed and stated that a blanket could have been used to cover them. Interviews with the staff revealed that the CNA had given the resident a bed bath earlier, and the therapist had placed the resident back in bed without covering them or drawing the curtain. The therapist admitted to not covering the resident to avoid dirtying the sheets and acknowledged that the curtain should have been drawn for privacy. The facility's policy on dignity and privacy was not followed, as confirmed by the CNA and the therapist. The Administrator and DON were informed of these findings and acknowledged the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 3,335 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Santa Ana
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plaza Healthcare Center | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| South Coast Global Medical Center D/p Snf | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Fountain Valley Post Acute | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 34 | 0 |
| French Park Care Center | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 51 | 0 |
| Foothill Regional Medical Center D/p Snf | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for South Coast Post Acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.