Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Indian Canyon Post Acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Infection control failures were identified in laundry processing, isolation precautions, and room sanitation. Laundry and housekeeping staff did not follow the disinfectant’s required contact time when cleaning dirty linen receptacles, laundry equipment, and related surfaces, and clean linen carts in the hallways were not being disinfected on a set schedule. A resident on contact precautions for CR Providencia stuartii did not have dedicated or disposable vital sign equipment available. In a shared room, accumulated trash, urine-soaked items, and visibly dirty floors were observed, and residents and staff reported the room had not been cleaned for days.
Resident council grievances were not addressed promptly after repeated concerns were raised about PT, nursing care, dietary services, housekeeping, laundry, and administration. A resident council president stated the meetings felt like a waste of time because concerns were never addressed, and about half of the attendees said the facility had not responded to the council's issues. The SSD, serving as the GO, said she did not receive the meeting minutes, while the AD said she was unaware she needed to forward them, resulting in no documented action on the council's concerns.
Failure to provide interpreter services for a resident whose primary language was Spanish. The resident, who had hemiplegia with hemiparesis, aphasia, intracranial injury, CKD, DM2, HTN, neuropathy, and MDD, reported frustration communicating needs and preferences to staff and said he was more comfortable when Spanish-speaking staff were available. The MDS identified Spanish as his preferred language and required an interpreter, but the care plan had no language-barrier interventions. Staff said the facility did not offer translation services and instead relied on Spanish-speaking staff when available or translation apps on personal cell phones.
Failure to care plan for ongoing finger-chewing behavior: A resident with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia was observed awake in bed, chewing aggressively on fingers of both hands, with severe nail damage noted on the left hand. CNAs reported the behavior had been ongoing, that toys were ineffective because the resident dropped and forgot them, and that a request for mittens did not result in action. The IDON stated the behavior and nail deterioration were not assessed or included in a care plan.
A resident with pneumonia, quadriplegia, COPD, and a UTI received ertapenem sodium injection, and the physician ordered intake and output monitoring every shift during antibiotic use. Staff did not document intake for 3 of 10 shifts and did not document output at all, despite the resident’s care plan addressing dehydration and fluid balance. The DON and CMR staff acknowledged the missing documentation.
Incorrect Low Air Loss Mattress Setting: A resident with pressure injuries, DM2, MRSA, HF, and bilateral lower-limb cellulitis was observed on a low air loss mattress set to 360 lbs even though his weight was about 275 to 276 lbs. The DON confirmed the mattress should have been set to the resident's weight, and the TAR showed staff documented the setting as 360 to 370 lbs for most shifts, with some incomplete entries, despite the order for tissue load management and shift checks.
An LPN signed the narcotic reconciliation log before the required physical count of controlled substances was completed. The AM and PM nurses were supposed to count and verify the narcotics together at shift change, then sign the log after the count was justified, but the PM nurse signed first and both nurses acknowledged the count had not yet been done when the log was signed. The DON confirmed the facility P&P was not followed.
Missing Documentation of Pharmacist MRR Recommendations: The facility failed to provide evidence that it received, documented, and acted on the consultant pharmacist’s monthly medication regimen review recommendations for a resident with HTN heart disease, MDD, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Record review showed the pharmacist completed MRRs for two months, but the resident was not on the no-recommendations lists, and the EMR did not contain the pharmacist’s recommendations. The DON stated the recommendations could not be found, although they were typically printed and sent to medical records for follow-up.
A resident with MRSA, DM2, HF, and cellulitis had an IV vancomycin bag hanging at the bedside that was not labeled correctly. The bag had no pharmacy label, and the only attached label was incomplete, with the resident's last name, room number, date, and time filled in while key medication fields were blank. The DON stated the nurse was supposed to transfer the pharmacy label from the foil pouch to the IV bag, and the CP confirmed that patient-specific label should be applied to the medication bag.
Failure to provide ordered adaptive drinking equipment occurred for a resident with dysphagia. Although the meal card and physician order indicated use of a nosey cup, the resident was observed drinking thin fluids with regular straws during lunch while a CNA assisted. The DS confirmed the nosey cup had not been provided and admitted regular straws were substituted without an OT reassessment or a new physician order, and the IDON and Dir/Rehab were not informed of the resident’s decline or need for re-evaluation.
A facility failed to protect a resident with dementia and quadriplegia from physical abuse when another resident kissed and fondled her without her capacity to consent. The incident was witnessed by a CNA who intervened, and the DON confirmed the resident's inability to consent, highlighting a breach in the facility's policy on resident rights.
A facility failed to accurately complete the PASRR screening for a resident with a serious mental illness. The resident's Level I PASRR screening did not capture their bipolar and anxiety disorders. Interviews revealed that facility staff were unclear about the process and responsibility for reviewing PASRR screenings for accuracy.
A resident with hypertensive heart disease and heart failure received bumetanide despite having a systolic blood pressure below the physician-ordered parameter. An LVN administered the medication when the resident's blood pressure was 102 mmHg, contrary to the order to hold the medication if SBP was less than 110 mmHg. Interviews with staff confirmed the failure to follow the physician's parameters.
A resident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dependent on staff for personal hygiene, was not provided with facial grooming as per facility policy. The resident was observed with unwanted facial hair, and staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness regarding the resident's grooming preferences. The facility's policy required staff to maintain grooming for residents unable to perform ADLs, highlighting a deficiency in care.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of intraspinal abscess and muscle weakness did not receive prescribed earwax removal drops due to a failure in transcribing the physician's order. The facility's staff, including the Social Services Director and nursing staff, acknowledged the breakdown in communication and order transcription, resulting in a delay of care.
Infection control failures in laundry disinfection, isolation equipment, and room sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program in several areas of environmental cleaning and transmission-based precautions. During a laundry and facility cleaning observation, the Housekeeping Lead and Laundry Staff 1 stated they used a neutral disinfectant on dirty linen receptacles, laundry barrels, the washer, dryer door, laundry baskets, and folding table, but did not keep the surfaces wet for the full 10-minute contact time required by the product directions. The Housekeeping Lead also stated the disinfectant was sprayed on mesh bags even though she was not aware it was intended for non-porous surfaces only. The Environmental Services Director confirmed the disinfectant should remain wet for 10 minutes and should not be wiped off before that time, and also stated the clean linen carts in the hallways were not being disinfected on a set schedule. Resident 82 was on contact isolation precautions for carbapenem-resistant Providencia stuartii, but the isolation cart outside the room did not contain dedicated or disposable vital sign equipment. The cart contained isolation gowns, gloves, and ice packs, but no disposable blood pressure cuff, thermometer, stethoscope, or pulse oximeter. The inside of the room also did not contain dedicated or disposable vital sign equipment. The resident stated staff brought the vital sign equipment into the room each day to take readings. The Interim DON and the Infection Preventionist confirmed that dedicated or disposable vital sign equipment should have been available. A room shared by Residents 36, 21, and 59 was observed with accumulated items under the beds, including blankets, pillows, urine-soaked towels, tissues, food wrappers, medicine cups, ice cream cups, Styrofoam cups, straws, and dirty utensils. The trash can was overflowing, and the floor was visibly dirty with crumbs, sticky substances, and scattered paper. Resident 36 stated the room had not been cleaned for the past three days and described placing urine-soaked towels on the floor because staff were not quick enough to empty his urinal. Resident 21 and Resident 59 also stated the room had not been cleaned for days, and a CNA stated housekeeping had not cleaned the room or removed the trash over the weekend. The Environmental and Maintenance Services Director acknowledged the scheduled housekeeper did not clean the room that weekend and confirmed the room should have been cleaned daily according to facility policy.
Resident Council Grievances Not Addressed Promptly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to act promptly on resident council grievances and recommendations over a three-month period, affecting 16 sampled residents who participated in the council meetings. During the entrance conference, the Interim Director of Nursing identified Resident 41 as the resident council president, but later the Administrator stated Resident 19 was the president. Resident 41 stated he was no longer serving as president because he felt the council was a waste of time since the facility never addressed the concerns raised by the council. A review of the resident council meeting minutes for August 2025, September 2025, and October 2025 showed repeated concerns about physical therapy, nursing care, dietary services, housekeeping, laundry, and administration. The documented concerns included requests for more PT, better response to call lights, medication timing, improved meal substitutions and snacks, cleaner rooms, correct laundry return, and more responsiveness from administration. During a resident council meeting attended by 16 residents, including Residents 41 and 19, approximately 50 percent of attendees stated the facility had neither responded to nor addressed the council's grievances and recommendations during that period. The Grievance Official, identified as the Social Services Director, stated it was her responsibility to address grievances and recommendations from resident council meetings, but she had not received the meeting minutes for approximately six months and therefore had not addressed the issues. The Activities Director stated she had assumed her role in July 2025, had received no orientation or training, and was unaware she was required to forward the resident council minutes to the Grievance Official. She stated she handwrote the minutes and verbally shared the concerns with the Operations Manager, Interim Director of Nursing, and Dietary Services Supervisor, but acknowledged that because it was not documented in writing, those individuals likely forgot. The Operations Manager and Administrator stated it was the Activities Director's responsibility to provide the minutes to the Grievance Official and the Grievance Official's responsibility to act on the documented concerns, and they acknowledged the facility had not acted promptly on the resident council's grievances and recommendations.
Failure to Provide Interpreter Services for Non-English Speaking Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide interpretive services to residents whose primary language was not English, including a resident whose primary language was Spanish and who did not speak or understand English. During an interview, the resident communicated through his daughter by phone that he was frustrated by being unable to convey his needs and preferences to staff because of the language barrier. He stated that he felt more comfortable when Spanish-speaking staff were available, but staffing variances meant he was not always assigned to them, which contributed to his frustration and unease during his stay. Record review showed the resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia with hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, aphasia, unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness, lack of coordination, type 2 diabetes, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease stage 4, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. The MDS identified him as Hispanic, noted Spanish as his preferred language, and indicated that an interpreter was required for communication with medical or healthcare staff. His care plan identified a communication problem related to a language barrier, impaired hearing, neurological symptoms, impaired cognition, depression, and aphasia, but there were no interventions addressing the language barrier. Staff interviews confirmed the facility did not offer translation services for non-English speaking residents. An LVN stated she used the Google Translate app on her personal cell phone to communicate with these residents, and the SSD stated she relied on available staff members for translation or used a translation application on her phone when staff were not available. The SSD also confirmed that the resident needed an interpreter to effectively communicate with staff, and the DON acknowledged that non-English speaking residents were unable to effectively communicate with staff and participate in their plan of care because the facility did not provide interpreter services as specified in its policy and procedure.
Failure to Care Plan for Ongoing Finger-Chewing Behavior
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident 89 when the resident displayed aggressive chewing on the thumb and first three fingers of the left hand and the first two fingers of the right hand. Resident 89 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and dementia. During observation, the resident was awake in bed, staring at the wall, not making eye contact or speaking, and was actively chewing on the first two fingers of the right hand while vocalizing. CNA 2 and CNA 3 stated the finger chewing had been an ongoing issue and that attempts to provide toys to hold and chew on were unsuccessful because the resident would drop the toy and forget about it. CNA 2 also stated he had asked the LVN charge nurse for mittens, but nothing came of it. The resident's left hand fingernails were observed to be severely damaged, with misshapen and deformed nails, significant yellow discoloration, thickening, brittleness, a crumbly texture, and some nails separated from the nail bed. CNA 3 stated the resident had chewed the left hand fingers a lot and had just started chewing on the right hand. The Interim DON stated she was not aware the behavior had escalated to this point, that there was no assessment of the left hand fingernails, and that the behavior and nail deterioration should have been assessed and included in a care plan but were not. The facility policy stated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables is to be developed and implemented for each resident, and that care plans are to be revised as conditions change.
Failure to Document Intake and Output as Ordered During Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a physician’s order to monitor intake and output every shift for Resident 11 while the resident was receiving ertapenem sodium injection for a urinary tract infection. Resident 11 was admitted with diagnoses including pneumonia, quadriplegia, and COPD. The resident’s care plan identified a goal of being free of dehydration symptoms and included interventions to encourage adequate fluid intake, administer medications as ordered, and monitor and report signs and symptoms of dehydration, including decreased or no urine output. The physician ordered intake and output monitoring every shift for antibiotic use until November 16, 2025, but the resident’s intake and output record showed intake was not documented for 3 of 10 shifts between November 12 and November 16, 2025. There was no output documentation anywhere in the medical record for those 10 shifts. During interview and record review, the DON acknowledged that nursing staff were supposed to document intake and output each shift as ordered, but had not, and the Corporate Medical Records Staff acknowledged that intake was missing for 3 shifts and output was not documented at all.
Incorrect Low Air Loss Mattress Setting
Penalty
Summary
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing was not ensured for one resident who was admitted with heart failure, MRSA infection, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cellulitis of both lower limbs. The resident was observed lying in bed on a low air loss mattress, and the mattress was set to 360 lbs even though the resident stated he weighed about 275 lbs. The Interim DON reviewed the EHR and confirmed the resident weighed 276 lbs, and stated that because the physician order did not specify a setting, the mattress was supposed to be set to the resident's body weight. The DON later observed the mattress was still set to 360 lbs and stated it was supposed to be set to 240 lbs, noting that 240 lbs was the closest selectable level to the resident's weight of 275 lbs. The resident's order directed use of a low air loss mattress for tissue load management and to check placement, motor, and setting every shift. The TAR showed that for 26 of 27 shifts during the month, staff documented the mattress setting as between 360 lbs and 370 lbs, with three incomplete shifts. The DON acknowledged the documented settings were incorrect and stated nurses were supposed to monitor the resident's weight and ensure the mattress was set per the resident's weight, but it was not done.
Narcotic Reconciliation Log Signed Before Physical Count
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure controlled substances were reconciled accurately and in accordance with its policy and procedure when a licensed nurse signed the narcotics reconciliation log before completing the required physical count of the controlled substances. During observation of the narcotic reconciliation log for the 400 hall medication cart, the log for the 7 AM to 7 PM shift was already signed by the PM shift nurse, while the AM shift nurse had not yet signed and the physical count of the narcotics had not yet been performed by either nurse. During interviews, the DON stated nurses were supposed to sign the controlled drug reconciliation record after physically counting the controlled drugs and verifying the count. The AM shift nurse stated the normal process was for the incoming and outgoing nurses to count the medications together and then sign after the count was verified, and stated the PM nurse had signed before the physical count was done. The PM shift nurse acknowledged signing the controlled substances reconciliation log before physically counting the medications. Review of the facility's Narcotic Count policy showed that one nurse going off duty and one nurse coming on duty must count and justify the narcotics supply for each resident at each shift change, and each nurse must record the date and signature after the count is completed and verified. The DON stated the policy was not followed.
Missing Documentation of Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide evidence that it received, documented, and acted upon the consultant pharmacist’s monthly medication regimen review recommendations for one resident. Resident 8 was admitted with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia. The record review showed the pharmacist completed medication regimen reviews for August 2025 and September 2025, but the resident was not listed on the facility’s “no recommendations” reports for either month, indicating there were recommendations associated with the reviews. However, the resident’s electronic medical record did not contain the pharmacist’s recommendations for either month. During interview, the DON stated she was unable to find evidence of the recommendations and said the recommendations were usually printed and sent to medical records for follow-up, but they could not be located. The facility policy required the licensed pharmacist to review each resident’s drug regimen, including the medical chart, at least monthly and to document irregularities on a separate written report sent to the attending physician, medical director, and DON, with those reports to be acted upon.
IV Vancomycin Bag Left Without Proper Pharmacy Label
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's antibiotic medication was labeled in accordance with its policy and procedure. Resident 3 was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, MRSA infection, diabetes mellitus type 2, and cellulitis of the left and right lower limbs. During a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 3's room, the resident was lying in bed with an IV bag of vancomycin already administered and hanging at the bedside. The vancomycin bag had no pharmacy label on it and instead had a label indicating medication added with the resident's last name, room number, date, and time, while the sections for drug, amount, added by, rate, and base solution were left blank. The DON stated the IV antibiotic was not labeled correctly and that the nurse was supposed to remove the pharmacy label from the foil pouch and apply it to the vancomycin bag after removal from the pouch, but this was not done. The Consultant Pharmacist stated IV vancomycin comes in a foil pouch with a patient-specific label on the outside, and when the medication bag is removed for administration, staff are supposed to remove that label from the pouch and apply it to the medication bag. The facility's policy for IV administration stated IV medications must be labeled in accordance with established procedures, and the labeling and storage policy stated medications and biologicals are to be labeled in accordance with facility requirements, state and federal laws.
Failure to Provide Ordered Adaptive Drinking Equipment
Penalty
Summary
Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance was not met for Resident 89, who had a diagnosis of dysphagia. Resident 89’s face sheet showed an admission date of October 3, 2023, and a physician’s order dated January 8, 2024, indicated use of a nosey cup. During a dining observation on December 1, 2025, Resident 89 was seated in the dining room while a CNA assisted with lunch. Although the meal card on the table indicated that Resident 89 should use a nosey cup, he was observed with a small milk carton and a cup of juice, both using regular straws, and the CNA assisted him to drink from those straws. The Dietary Supervisor confirmed that the meal card specified a nosey cup, but one had not been provided. The Dietary Supervisor stated she had not informed the IDON, the physician, or the Dir/Rehab that Resident 89 had declined and was no longer holding the nosey cup, and she admitted to substituting regular straws without obtaining an OT assessment for straw use or requesting a new dietary order from the physician. The IDON stated she had not been informed of the decline or the need for a new OT evaluation and order, and the Dir/Rehab stated Resident 89 should have been re-evaluated before the nosey cup was replaced with regular straws; she confirmed her department had not been informed and no re-evaluation had been conducted.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a female resident from physical abuse when a male resident kissed her on the mouth and fondled her, despite her lack of capacity to consent. The incident occurred when the male resident admitted to kissing and touching the female resident, who had dementia and quadriplegia, and was unable to make decisions or consent to such contact. The female resident initially called the male resident over and engaged in the interaction, but later indicated that she wanted the contact to stop, which the male resident complied with after being instructed by a nurse to step away. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) witnessed the male resident leaning over the female resident with his hand inside her shirt and intervened by instructing him to back away. The CNA reported the incident to the Charge Nurse, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the female resident did not have the capacity to consent to the sexual contact. The facility's policy on resident rights, which includes protection from abuse and neglect, was not upheld in this situation, as the female resident was not adequately protected from physical abuse.
Failure to Accurately Complete PASRR Screening
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) was accurately completed for a resident with a serious mental illness (SMI). The resident, who was admitted to the facility, had a medical history that included diagnoses of bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. Despite these diagnoses, the resident's Level I PASRR screening indicated that there were no diagnosed SMIs or suspected mental illnesses. This discrepancy was not identified or corrected by the facility staff. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the review process for PASRR screenings. The Social Services Director and the Medical Records Resource both stated that the hospital completed the resident's Level I PASRR screening, but neither was aware of a process to review these screenings for accuracy. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator also expressed uncertainty about who was responsible for ensuring the accuracy of PASRR screenings, with the Administrator indicating that it was the responsibility of the medical records staff.
Failure to Administer Medication According to Physician's Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were administered according to the physician's orders for a resident with a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The resident was admitted on January 28, 2024, and had an order for bumetanide, a medication for congestive heart failure, to be administered once daily, provided the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was not below 110 mmHg. However, the medication administration record (MAR) for October 2024 showed that a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) administered the medication on October 2, 2024, when the resident's SBP was 102 mmHg, which was below the physician-ordered parameter. Interviews conducted with the LVN, a Medical Doctor, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Administrator confirmed the failure to adhere to the physician's parameters for medication administration. The LVN acknowledged the mistake, stating that staff were supposed to check the resident's blood pressure before administering the medication. Both the Medical Doctor and the DON emphasized the importance of following physician-ordered parameters, and the Administrator deferred to the DON regarding medication administration protocols.
Failure to Provide Facial Grooming for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate facial grooming for a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living (ADL) independently. The resident, who was admitted with a medical history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke and a complete traumatic trans metacarpal amputation of the left hand, was totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Despite the facility's policy requiring necessary services to maintain grooming for residents unable to perform ADLs, the resident was observed with facial hair approximately 1/4 inch long, which they indicated they did not like. Interviews revealed that the staff was not aware of the resident's grooming preferences. A CNA who worked with the resident for the first time did not shave the resident during a bed bath, and a family member stated that the resident was shaved about once a month. Both the LVN and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that staff should be aware of and accommodate residents' preferences, including offering to shave them during bathing. The Administrator also confirmed that staff should assist residents with bathing and shaving, indicating a lapse in adherence to the facility's policy and resident care plan.
Failure to Transcribe Physician Order for Ear Drops
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to transcribe a physician order from an outside ENT physician for a resident with communication sensory concerns. The resident, who had a medical history of intraspinal abscess, granuloma, and muscle weakness, was admitted to the facility and later seen by a physician assistant for issues related to hearing and congestion. The physician assistant's plan included the use of earwax removal aid drops twice a day for four days in the resident's left ear. However, the medication administration record (MAR) for the resident showed no evidence of this order being transcribed or carried out during the specified timeframe. Interviews with facility staff revealed a breakdown in the process of transcribing and following up on physician orders. The Social Services Director and nursing staff indicated that orders from consulting physicians were supposed to be communicated to and transcribed by the nursing staff. However, the order for the ear drops was not transcribed into the medical system, resulting in a delay of care. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator acknowledged that the order was not carried out as expected, and the facility was unable to produce the physician orders that were given to the nurse on duty.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 116 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Yucca Valley
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua Tree Post Acute | 1.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
| Hi-desert Medical Center D/p Snf | 7.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
| California Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 19.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Desert Regional Medical Center D/p Snf | 19.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
| Premier Care Center For Palm Springs | 20.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 35 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Indian Canyon Post Acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.