Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around May 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Windcrest Health And Rehab Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Kitchen sanitation, food handling, and hand hygiene failures were observed during meal prep and service. An ice machine swipe showed brown and black specks, a food prep area had insect boxes and an ant was killed on the counter without sanitizing the surface, and a frying pot had heavy black buildup and murky oily residue. Staff also handled cups, lids, the ice scoop, and refrigerator items without hand hygiene, and a dietary aide stated they did not wash hands as often as they should.
Improper Waste Containment and Debris Around Dumpster Area: Surveyors observed debris around the dumpsters, including metal pieces, a broken bedside table top, gloves, paper scraps, a grocery bag, an aluminum can, and a Styrofoam cup on multiple observations. The area behind the building also had a grease trap with chairs, a dolly, and a thermometer on top of it, plus a tin can with water and cigarette butts nearby. The MNT Dir confirmed responsibility for the area, while the Dietary Mgr and Admin described shared trash duties and routine monitoring, but no documentation of trash pickup or grounds checks was maintained.
Soiled Linens, Missing Window Blinds, and Exposed Fan in Resident Rooms: A resident room had a bare pillow with a large brown stain, heavily soiled bed linens that remained unchanged over multiple days, missing window blinds that prevented privacy during dressing, and a floor fan with its safety cover missing and blades exposed. Staff stated the linens should be changed when soiled and that maintenance issues were supposed to be reported, but these environmental concerns had not been reported or resolved at the time of observation.
Two residents were observed independently keeping cigarettes and lighters in their personal belongings during smoke breaks, despite care plans and smoking safety screens stating their smoking supplies were to be stored at the nurses’ station and that they required supervision and smoking aprons. One resident with epilepsy and glaucoma was seen with multiple lighters and a pouch containing cigarettes and a lighter, while another resident with mobility impairment, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and fall risk was seen removing a cigarette and lighter from a case and lighting the cigarette without staff assistance. Staff interviews confirmed residents were not supposed to have smoking paraphernalia on their person, and the APRN stated no residents had been approved for that.
Failure to separate two residents after an alleged sexual contact incident. A resident reported that another resident touched them in the chest/breast area during a smoke break, and the other resident had documented dementia, sexual disorder diagnoses, and hypersexual behaviors in the care plan. Despite staff awareness that the residents were to be kept apart, an observation later showed them seated next to each other in the smoking area, and staff interviews showed the separation instruction was not consistently communicated or followed.
The facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment, with issues such as soiled bedsheets for a resident, water-damaged ceilings, and poorly maintained air conditioning units. Observations revealed inadequate housekeeping practices and structural issues, including peeling rubber stripping and exposed, eroding walls. The Maintenance Director and Administrator acknowledged these problems, highlighting the need for improved cleaning and maintenance efforts.
A facility failed to ensure medications were not pre-popped before administration for seven residents. An LPN was observed placing pre-popped medication cups in a cart drawer, contrary to facility policy. The LPN admitted to the practice, acknowledging it was a bad habit. The DON was unaware of this practice and expressed dissatisfaction upon discovery.
A facility failed to maintain appropriate food temperatures, affecting meal palatability and nutritional intake. A resident reported cold food, and an observation revealed that an unheated food cart was used improperly, leading to inadequate food temperatures. The CNA acknowledged leaving the cart open, contributing to the issue.
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment, with issues such as rusty air vents, dirty floors, and expired food items. Additionally, staff did not follow proper hygiene practices, handling food and utensils without washing hands, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with Parkinsonism and dementia was observed with unshaven facial hair, food-stained clothing, and unclean hands and face after meals, despite needing extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Staff interviews confirmed the resident's preference for cleanliness and the need for assistance, highlighting a failure to maintain the resident's dignity.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents, leading to discrepancies between care plans and actual care provided. One resident, with Parkinsonism and dementia, was observed with inadequate personal hygiene and dressing assistance, while another, with cerebral infarction and dementia, showed inconsistencies in required assistance levels. Staff confirmed the care plans did not match the residents' needs, and despite awareness of these issues, no documented corrective actions were taken.
The facility failed to update care plans accurately for three residents, leading to discrepancies between documented care needs and actual assistance provided. One resident with Parkinsonism and dementia was observed with inadequate personal hygiene and dressing assistance, while another with cerebral infarction had inconsistencies in care plan documentation. A third resident's care plan included outdated interventions for diuretic therapy. Staff interviews confirmed the misalignment between care plans and residents' current needs.
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents, resulting in discrepancies between documented needs and actual care requirements. One resident, with conditions like Parkinsonism and dementia, had hygiene issues and varying assistance needs not reflected in their care plan. Another resident, with cerebral infarction and dementia, had a care plan indicating total dependence, yet was observed eating independently. Staff confirmed the inaccuracies, and despite identifying the issue, no documented corrective actions were taken.
A resident with Parkinsonism, dementia, chronic pain, and muscle weakness required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. Observations showed the resident was not shaved, had food stains on clothing, and was not cleaned after meals. The resident preferred to be clean, and staff confirmed the need for assistance. The DON acknowledged the resident's face and hands should have been cleaned, and a soiled shirt should have been changed.
Kitchen sanitation, food handling, and hand hygiene failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep the kitchen, food preparation equipment, and food contact areas clean and sanitary during observations of the kitchen and meal service. During the initial kitchen tour, a swipe test of the ice machine where ice dispensed revealed brown and black specks on a white paper towel. The ice machine was documented as cleaned weekly, with the cleaning schedule showing it had been cleaned on 06/02/2026 and 06/09/2026. A black insect box was also observed on the window seal above the food preparation area and another beside the microwave on the food preparation surface, and an ant was killed on the counter during food preparation without sanitizing the area afterward. Food storage and equipment sanitation concerns were also observed. A pork roast in a shallow pan in the bottom of the left refrigerator was labeled 06/01/2026, and the Dietary Consultant stated that date was when it was pulled from the freezer. On follow-up observation, the pork loin was no longer in the refrigerator, and the Dietary Consultant stated it had been thrown out because it had been held too long. The Dietary Manager stated the pork loin had been in the refrigerator since June 1 and should have been cooked the prior day for lunch. In addition, a large pot used to fry foods was observed with a brown murky oily substance, brown debris floating on top, and heavy black buildup of charring on the inside and outside. On follow-up, the pot still showed amber and brown residue with heavy black areas and flaking buildup on the inside and outside, despite staff stating it had been cleaned. Hand hygiene and food handling practices were also observed to be inconsistent with sanitary standards. Dietary Aide #10 was observed filling cups, touching the outside of a plastic wrap box, touching cup rims with a bare hand, and covering cups with plastic without hand hygiene. During lunch service, the same aide touched clothing, glasses, coffee cup lids, the ice scoop, the ice machine, and items in the refrigerator without hand hygiene between tasks. The aide stated, "I don't wash my hands as often as I should. It does spread germs." The Dietary Manager stated staff were expected to wash hands when moving from dirty to clean tasks and when touching clothing, and the Administrator stated kitchen staff needed to follow the facility hand sanitizing policy. Facility in-services and policies reviewed addressed handwashing, sanitizing surfaces, avoiding contact with cup rims, and keeping kitchens free from insects, but the observed practices did not reflect those standards.
Improper Waste Containment and Debris Around Dumpster Area
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that waste was properly contained in the dumpsters and that the area around the dumpsters was free from debris. During observations behind the facility, surveyors saw pieces of metal, a broken bedside table top, multiple gloves on the ground around the dumpster, a white plastic grocery bag, scraps of paper, an aluminum can, and a Styrofoam cup. These same items were observed again during later observations on two additional days, showing the debris remained in the area. Surveyors also observed the commercial grease trap behind the building with two plastic chairs leaning on it, a plastic wheeled dolly lying on top of it, and a cooking thermometer on top of it. A large tin can full of water and cigarette butts was on the ground nearby, and the top of the grease trap had a thick black substance on it. The Maintenance Director confirmed the dumpster findings and stated he was responsible for the area around the dumpster and picked it up daily. The Dietary Manager stated kitchen staff were responsible for taking out kitchen trash and dietary aides for dish room trash, and the Administrator stated staff were expected to follow the grounds policy and pick up trash daily, but neither the Administrator nor the Maintenance Director documented when the area was checked or cleaned. Review of the facility sanitation policy stated kitchen wastes not disposed of mechanically shall be kept in clean, leakproof, nonabsorbent, tightly closed containers and disposed of daily.
Soiled Linens, Missing Window Blinds, and Exposed Fan in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment by leaving heavily soiled bed linens and a stained pillow unchanged in resident rooms over multiple days. In room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, a bed was observed with a bare pillow missing its pillowcase, and the pillow had a large dark brown stain approximately 8 inches in diameter across the center. On a later observation, the bed linens at the foot of the bed were heavily soiled with a reddish-brown substance, and on a follow-up observation the soiled bed sheets were still not changed or laundered. The facility also failed to maintain privacy for Resident #26 because the room window blinds were missing. During observation and interview, there were no blinds on the window, and Resident #26 stated that due to the missing blinds they changed clothing in the corner. In addition, a floor fan in the room was missing its protective safety cover, leaving the blades exposed to resident contact. Staff interviews showed the missing blinds and soiled linens had not been reported or addressed through the facility’s maintenance process at the time of the observations.
Smoking items left in residents’ possession during smoke breaks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free from smoking hazards when two residents were observed with cigarettes and lighters in their possession during smoke breaks, despite facility documentation stating their smoking supplies were to be stored at the nurses’ station and that they required supervision and smoking aprons. Resident #41, who had diagnoses including epilepsy and glaucoma and was documented as cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15, was observed with a lighter on one smoke break, then later observed removing a second lighter from a personal bag. On another smoke break, the resident was seen independently removing cigarettes and a lighter from a black and pink pouch hanging from the wheelchair, lighting the cigarette, and keeping the smoking items in the pouch rather than turning them over to staff. Resident #29, who had diagnoses including difficulty walking, neuralgia, neuritis, long-term opioid use, polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, paranoid schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, was also observed independently removing a cigarette and lighter from a black case on the lap during the smoke break and lighting the cigarette without staff assistance. The resident’s care plan and smoking safety screen indicated smoking supplies were to be stored at the nurse station, the resident required a smoking apron and supervision, and the resident was high risk for falls with impaired vision and use of a wheelchair and walker. Staff were present in the smoking area assisting other residents, but the resident still retained and used the smoking materials independently. Interviews and record review showed staff knew residents were not allowed to keep their own cigarettes and lighters on their person unless independently approved, and the APRN stated no residents had been approved to keep smoking paraphernalia in their possession. The DON stated Resident #41 was not allowed to have smoking items on their person, and an LPN showed the smoking items were kept in an unlocked drawer at the nurses’ station. The facility policy stated residents without independent smoking privileges were not allowed to keep smoking material except under direct supervision, and smoking items found in violation of policy could be confiscated.
Failure to Separate Residents After Alleged Sexual Contact
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to recognize and assess risk factors for possible sexually inappropriate behavior and failed to maintain separation between two residents after an allegation that one resident had inappropriately touched the other during a smoke break. The reportable, witness statements, and interviews indicated Resident #40 reported that Resident #50 touched them in the chest/breast area while both were outside smoking, and Resident #40 was described as very displeased and uncomfortable. Resident #40 had diagnoses including dementia and cognitive communication deficit, but the quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 15 and indicated the resident was cognitively intact and did not use a mobility device. Resident #50 had diagnoses of vascular dementia and other sexual disorders, and the care plan documented hypersexual behaviors including grabbing CNAs inappropriately and making sexually inappropriate comments. The record also showed an injectable medication related to the sexual dysfunction diagnosis. Despite the allegation and the facility’s awareness that the residents were to be separated, an observation later showed Resident #50 seated immediately next to Resident #40 in the smoking area during a smoke break. Resident #40 stated they were not happy that Resident #50 had been seated next to them and again asked whether Resident #50 was going to jail. Staff interviews showed inconsistent understanding and implementation of the separation instruction. One CNA stated she was unaware the residents were not to sit together, another CNA stated she placed Resident #50 next to Resident #40 because it was the only spot available and said she had not been told by the DON, ADON, or Administrator to keep them apart, and the DON stated he believed keeping them from sitting next to each other was the appropriate intervention. The Administrator stated it was not acceptable to place the residents next to each other and that the DON or designee should have immediately instructed staff to keep them separated. The facility abuse prevention policy stated residents have the right to be free from abuse and that administration will protect residents from abuse by anyone, including other residents.
Facility Fails to Maintain Clean and Safe Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by several observations of unaddressed maintenance issues and inadequate housekeeping practices. Resident #11 was found with soiled bedsheets that were not changed promptly, indicating a lack of proper care and attention to hygiene. Additionally, the facility had visible signs of water damage, such as brown stains on ceiling tiles and light fixtures, and structural issues like peeling rubber stripping and exposed, eroding walls in the dining room. Further observations revealed that the facility's air conditioning units and vents were in poor condition, with visible accumulations of dirt and substances that could potentially affect air quality. The air conditioning units were described as having a yellowish tinge and blackish-brown substances, while the vents contained fuzzy, dark brown substances. These conditions were confirmed by the Maintenance Director, who acknowledged the difficulty in cleaning the units and the ongoing process of replacing them. The facility's housekeeping practices were also found lacking, as there was no established housekeeping policy, and the deep cleaning schedule was not effectively implemented. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both acknowledged the issues with air filtration and the need for improved cleaning practices. The absence of a structured housekeeping policy and the failure to address maintenance issues contributed to the overall deficiency in providing a safe and homelike environment for the residents.
Medication Pre-Popping Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were not pre-popped prior to administration for seven residents. This deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and reviews of records and facility policies. The facility's policy on administering medications, revised in April 2019, mandates that medications be administered safely, timely, and as prescribed, with verification of the resident's identity and medication details before administration. However, during an observation, an LPN was seen placing empty medication cups on the cart and later observed placing pre-popped medication cups in the cart's drawer. The LPN admitted to pre-popping medications, acknowledging it was against policy and a bad habit. The LPN confirmed that pre-popped medications had been destroyed and described the correct procedure for medication administration, which includes verifying the right resident and medication details before popping the medication. The LPN admitted to pre-popping medications the previous day as well. The Director of Nursing (DON) was unaware of this practice and expressed dissatisfaction upon discovery. The DON confirmed that there were no competencies on medication administration for the LPN involved, and a list of affected residents and actions taken to prevent recurrence was provided.
Removal Plan
- Replace medications that had to be wasted at the facility's expense.
- In-service LPN #3 on proper medication administration.
- Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) to observe medication administration with LPN #3.
- Provide education to the rest of the nursing staff on duty.
- Conduct in-service training titled 'Preventing Medication Errors'.
Inadequate Food Temperature Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink were served at appropriate temperatures to maintain palatability and encourage adequate nutritional intake. During an observation, it was noted that a resident complained about the food being cold when served in the dining room and even colder when served in their room. This issue was further evidenced during a meal service where an unheated food cart was used to transport and serve meals. The cart was left open while being loaded and during the distribution of meal trays, which contributed to the food items being served at inadequate temperatures. Temperature readings taken immediately after the last resident was served revealed that both hot and cold food items were not at safe or appetizing temperatures. For instance, milk was served at 54.8 degrees Fahrenheit, and various hot food items, such as mashed potatoes and pepper steak, were served at temperatures ranging from 93 to 113 degrees Fahrenheit. The CNA involved acknowledged leaving the food cart open during the meal service, which likely contributed to the temperature deficiencies observed.
Sanitation and Hygiene Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen and food preparation areas, as observed during a survey. The dishwashing machine air vent was found to be rusty, and the kitchen floors, baseboards, and walls were not free of dirt. Chipped floor tiles were not replaced, exposing concrete and cement in several areas. Additionally, expired spices and leftover fruit items were not promptly removed from stock, with a container of leftover diced peaches and a container of red pepper found past their expiration dates. Furthermore, the facility did not adhere to proper hygiene practices. A scoop holder by the ice machine had a gray, wet residue, which was in contact with the scoop used for serving beverages to residents. Dietary staff were observed handling food and utensils without washing their hands, including picking up glasses by the rims and serving beverages. These actions were contrary to the facility's policy on preventing foodborne illness, which requires employees to wash their hands after activities that contaminate them.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity and Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dignity of a resident by not providing adequate personal hygiene and clothing changes. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, dementia, chronic pain, and muscle weakness, was observed on multiple occasions with unshaven facial hair, food stains on clothing, and unclean hands and face after meals. Despite the resident's cognitive intactness and expressed preference for cleanliness, staff did not ensure the resident's personal hygiene needs were met, as evidenced by observations of the resident with long facial hair and wearing the same stained shirt throughout the day. Interviews with staff, including a CNA and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the resident required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. The CNA acknowledged that the resident liked to be shaved and that the resident's face and hands should have been cleaned after meals, with a change of clothing offered. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that the resident should have been cleaned and offered a change of clothing after meals, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its policy on resident dignity and personal care.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments and Care Plan Discrepancies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, leading to discrepancies between the MDS, care plans, and actual care provided. Resident #2, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism and dementia, was assessed as needing varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). However, observations revealed inconsistencies in the care provided, such as the resident being left unshaven and in soiled clothing, indicating a lack of proper assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. Interviews with staff confirmed that the care plan did not accurately reflect the resident's needs, as the resident required extensive assistance with transfers and personal care. Resident #14, admitted with conditions such as cerebral infarction and dementia, was also subject to inaccurate MDS assessments. The resident was documented as needing substantial assistance with ADLs, including total dependence for transfers using a mechanical lift. However, observations showed the resident eating independently without assistance, and staff interviews confirmed discrepancies between the care plan and the actual assistance required. The MDS coordinator acknowledged that the care plans were not updated to reflect the residents' current needs, leading to inconsistencies in the care provided. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the MDS coordinator were aware of the inaccuracies in the MDS assessments and care plans, as these issues were identified and discussed in Quality Assurance meetings. Despite this, there was no documented follow-up or corrective action taken to address the discrepancies. The facility's failure to ensure accurate assessments and care plans resulted in inadequate care for the residents, as evidenced by the observations and staff interviews.
Removal Plan
- Interdisciplinary team members were in-serviced to make sure information was entered correctly on the MDS
- MDS coordinator and DON/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in-serviced to ensure accuracy prior to signing and/or submitting the MDS
- The MDS coordinator will ensure the care plan was updated when completing the MDS
- MDS sections will be audited to ensure all sections were being completed accurately by the DON or designee
- Hire new MDS coordinator
- Sign MDS coordinator up for training
Inaccurate and Outdated Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure care plans were updated with accurate information and failed to resolve care plans that were no longer needed for three residents. Resident #2, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism and dementia, had a care plan that did not accurately reflect the level of assistance needed for activities of daily living. Observations showed that Resident #2 was not receiving adequate assistance with personal hygiene and dressing, as evidenced by the resident's unshaven appearance and stained clothing. Interviews with staff confirmed that the care plan used did not match the resident's current needs. Resident #14, admitted with diagnoses such as cerebral infarction and dementia, also had discrepancies between the care plan and the actual assistance required. The care plan indicated total dependence on staff for bathing and transferring, yet observations and staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the level of assistance provided. The care plan did not accurately reflect the resident's current needs, leading to potential gaps in care. Resident #23's care plan included interventions for diuretic therapy, despite the resident no longer being on such medication. The care plan had not been updated since the discontinuation of the diuretic, leading to outdated and inaccurate information. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plans and MDS assessments were not aligned, and there was a lack of documented follow-up on identified inaccuracies.
Removal Plan
- Interdisciplinary team members were in-serviced to make sure information was entered correctly on the MDS
- MDS coordinator and DON/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in-serviced to ensure accuracy prior to signing and/or submitting the MDS
- MDS coordinator will ensure care plan is updated when completing the MDS
- MDS sections will be audited to ensure all sections are being completed accurately by the DON or designee
- Hire new MDS coordinator
- Sign MDS coordinator up for training
Inaccurate and Outdated Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated within the appropriate time frame with accurate information for two residents. Resident #2, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, dementia, chronic pain, and muscle weakness, had a care plan that was not reflective of their current needs. Observations revealed that Resident #2 required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living, such as bed mobility and toileting, which were not accurately documented in the care plan. Additionally, Resident #2 was observed to have personal hygiene issues, such as unshaven facial hair and stained clothing, indicating a lack of proper care. Resident #14, admitted with conditions including cerebral infarction and dementia, also had discrepancies between their care plan and actual needs. The care plan indicated total dependence on staff for certain activities, but observations showed that Resident #14 was able to eat without assistance. Interviews with staff confirmed that the care plan did not match the resident's current abilities and needs, as Resident #14 required a mechanical lift for transfers and was unable to dress or position themselves in bed. The facility's failure to update care plans was acknowledged by the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing (DON), who confirmed that the care plans and MDS assessments did not align. Despite identifying the issue in a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meeting, there was no documented follow-up or corrective action taken to address the inaccuracies. This lack of action resulted in care plans that did not accurately reflect the residents' needs, potentially impacting the quality of care provided.
Removal Plan
- Interdisciplinary team members were in-serviced to make sure information was entered correctly on the MDS
- MDS coordinator and DON/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in-serviced to ensure accuracy prior to signing and/or submitting the MDS
- MDS coordinator will ensure the care plan is updated when completing the MDS
- MDS sections will be audited to ensure all sections are being completed accurately by the DON or designee
- Hire new MDS coordinator
- Sign MDS coordinator up for training
Failure to Assist Resident with Personal Hygiene and Dressing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate assistance with activities of daily living for a resident who was unable to independently perform these tasks. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, dementia, chronic pain, and muscle weakness, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. Despite this, observations revealed that the resident was not shaved for several days, had food stains on their clothing, and had not been cleaned after meals. The resident expressed a preference to be clean, indicating that the lack of care was not due to refusal. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident typically allowed staff to assist with shaving and that their face and hands should have been cleaned after meals. The CNA acknowledged that the resident needed extensive assistance with dressing and that the soiled shirt should have been changed if the resident agreed. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that the resident's face and hands should have been cleaned before leaving the dining room and that staff should have offered to change the soiled shirt.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 79 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Springdale
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shiloh Nursing And Rehab, Llc | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Springdale Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| Westwood Health And Rehab, Inc | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Edgewood Health And Rehab | 3.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| The Maples At Har-ber Meadows | 4.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Windcrest Health And Rehab Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.