RN Coverage Not Documented on Multiple Days
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the use of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week on 5 of 92 days reviewed for RN coverage: 1/03/2026, 1/24/2026, 1/25/2026, 1/31/2026, and 3/13/2026. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report FY Quarter 2 2026 (January 1 - March 31) showed no RN hours were reported to CMS on those dates. During interview, the DON stated his expectation was to have RN coverage 8 hours a day and said he started working at the facility on 3/16/2026, working every day since then. He stated the previous DON’s last day was 3/13/2026 and he was unsure why no RN hours were reported before he started. He also stated there was a weekend supervisor who was an RN and had worked at the facility to help ensure 8 hours of RN coverage on weekends. The ADMN stated she knew of an email thread in which the previous ADMN told him he did not report RN hours appropriately, and she believed the facility had RN coverage. However, after reviewing nurse schedules and a SharePoint site, she was unable to find evidence that an RN worked 8 consecutive hours for the dates in question. She also found a QAPI meeting note stating the previous ADMN documented the facility had 31 days of RN coverage in January 2026. The facility policy stated an RN provides services at least 8 hours every 24 hours, seven days a week.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.