Failure to Honor Married Residents’ Request to Share a Room
Summary
The facility failed to ensure two married residents were permitted to share a room when both lived in the facility and both consented. Resident 2 and Resident 77 had been married for 66 years, both were cognitively intact with BIMS scores of 14 out of 15, and both expressed a desire to reside together. The facility’s own policy stated residents have the right to share a room with their spouse when both spouses reside in the facility and both consent, but there was no documented evidence that the facility made reasonable efforts to accommodate the couple’s request before surveyor intervention. Resident 2 was admitted with diagnoses including acute kidney failure and major depressive disorder. During a care conference, he stated his wife would be moving in soon and he wanted to share a room with her. His care plan identified depression, sadness, tearfulness, self-isolation, and risk for psychosocial decline, but it did not document his preference to live with his spouse. Later progress notes documented that he and Resident 77 had been married for 66 years and had lived together at home before entering LTC, yet the record still did not show that the facility addressed his request, attempted to accommodate a shared room, or involved the IDT in the decision. There was also no documented evidence that he declined to share a room with his wife. Resident 77 was admitted with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood disorder, and paradoxical insomnia. Her care plan identified altered mood state, sadness, anxiety, decreased interest in activities, and risk for psychosocial decline, but it also did not document her preference to reside with her spouse. Her progress notes stated she came to the facility to be closer to her husband and planned for them to move into a room together once one became available. The notes also described significant anxiety, distress, poor sleep, and poor appetite related to the living situation and her husband’s unhappiness at the facility. The Social Worker stated the couple had requested to share a room and that the facility had not been able to accommodate the request because of census and room configuration issues, and that it would likely be several more weeks before they could reside together. After surveyor inquiry, staff prepared to move the couple into a shared room, and both residents later stated they wanted to continue residing together.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.