EBP, Hand Hygiene, and Employee TB Testing Failures
Summary
The facility failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care and catheter care for Resident #5, who had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for toileting and dressing, had an indwelling catheter, and had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer and a deep tissue pressure injury. The resident’s care plan identified the catheter and risk for skin breakdown, but it did not include direction for EBP or the sacral wound. During observation, CNA H and LPN I entered the room, applied gloves, and provided hygiene, catheter care, and wound care without wearing gowns. Both staff members removed gloves and put on clean gloves multiple times without performing hand hygiene between glove changes. CNA H stated he/she had been taught about EBP but did not think about it with this resident, and LPN I stated he/she did not know what EBP was and did not believe the resident required it. The facility also failed to provide EBP during wound care for Resident #15, whose admission MDS identified cognitive impairment and diagnoses including orthopedic condition, wound infection, surgical joint repair, and surgical wound care. The physician order required daily wound care to the left upper arm with cleansing, soaked gauze, dressing pad, kerlix, and ACE wraps. Observation showed the resident’s door did not have EBP signage and gowns were not available on the PPE cart. During wound care, LPN A applied the kerlix wrap, removed his/her gown, and then wrapped the arm with an ACE bandage, stating he/she was not going to be in contact with other residents so he/she did not need the gown. The resident stated staff had never worn gowns during wound care prior to that day. LPN A stated EBP was used for residents with infection or catheter depending on the reason for the catheter, and said PICC lines did not require EBP. The facility also failed to ensure two-step PPD testing was completed for eight employees. Review of employee files for Housekeeper J, CMT K, CNA L, Housekeeper M, DA N, LPN O, SSD, and ABOM showed each had documentation of only a first PPD skin test and read, with no second PPD administered one to three weeks later as required by facility policy. Interviews showed the ABOM believed another nurse was responsible for employee TB testing, LPN P said he/she administered and read the initial test but did not know who ensured the second step was given or tracked, and the DON stated the Flat Branch nurse was responsible and was aware the facility was out of compliance.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.