Failure to Recognize and Respond to Sepsis-Related Changes in Condition
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that nursing staff possessed and exercised appropriate competencies to recognize and respond to significant changes in condition, including signs and symptoms consistent with sepsis, for two residents. For Resident #1, who had been admitted after surgical repair of a hip fracture and was consistently documented as alert and oriented with no cognitive impairment, the clinical record showed a rapid decline beginning overnight. Late in the evening, his blood pressure was within normal limits and no neurological concerns were documented. By early the next morning, his blood pressure had dropped significantly, and the weekend on-call provider was contacted about hypotension, resulting in orders to hold certain medications, test for blood in stool, and perform hourly blood pressure checks. Subsequently, Resident #1’s condition further deteriorated. At 7:30 a.m., he was documented as unresponsive to verbal stimuli with low blood pressure and decreased oxygen saturation on room air, and his unresponsive neurological status persisted throughout the day. The primary care physician (PCP) was notified and ordered IV fluids at 100 ml/hr, followed by additional IV fluids later in the morning as hypotension, tachycardia, and worsening oxygenation continued despite escalating oxygen support. Vital signs remained unstable, with blood pressures in the 70s–80s systolic and low diastolic readings, heart rate of 132, and fluctuating oxygen saturations requiring up to 8 LPM of oxygen. The PCP eventually ordered transfer to the hospital around midday, and EMS documentation listed sepsis with hypotension as the primary impression. The resident’s death certificate identified sepsis as the cause of death. In an interview, the LPN assigned to Resident #1 during the morning shift stated she did not remember the resident or the events but acknowledged, after reviewing her notes, that she had contacted the PCP and followed his orders for IV fluids and monitoring. She reported that she did not question the provider’s orders, believed it was not her role to judge their appropriateness, and stated she could not send a resident to the ER without an order. When presented with a scenario involving low blood pressure, loss of consciousness, and declining respiratory status, she did not identify sepsis as a likely cause and reiterated that as a nurse she could only follow physician orders. She also stated she did not know who the facility’s medical director was. The DON stated that sepsis recognition and immediate action are expected nursing standards in the facility and that sepsis has been a long-standing focus of nursing education. For Resident #2, the facility also failed to demonstrate competent recognition and timely response to a significant change in condition consistent with sepsis. The resident was documented as alert, responsive, talking, and answering questions with staff in the evening. Shortly thereafter, a CNA reported a change in condition, and an LPN assessed the resident, finding hypotension with a blood pressure of 78/46 and signs of acute distress, including lethargy, respiratory congestion, labored breathing, and intermittent gasping. The LPN identified the condition as possible sepsis but did not immediately contact the on-call provider. Nearly an hour elapsed between the assessment and the call to the provider, who then ordered transfer to the hospital. The LPN later stated she believed she was required to speak with a provider before sending a resident out and could not explain the delay between recognizing the change in condition and contacting the provider. The DON again stated that nurses in the facility are expected to recognize early signs and symptoms of sepsis and take immediate action, and that nurses have autonomy to use their judgment to send residents to the hospital even without a provider’s order. The facility’s President of Operations stated that the facility did not have a policy regarding competent nursing staff. The DON reported that newly hired nurses receive some training on identifying sepsis at hire and that all staff receive annual refresher training on sepsis, but also acknowledged that it would be very hard to say that either resident was transferred to the hospital in a timely manner. These findings, based on staff interviews, physician interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, support the conclusion that the facility failed to provide competent nursing staff capable of recognizing and appropriately responding to significant changes in condition, including signs and symptoms consistent with sepsis, for two residents in the survey sample.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Insulin Pen Priming Competency Not Verified: An LPN administered Humalog insulin to a resident without priming the Kwik Pen first and stated she was unaware that priming was required. The facility could not produce the nurse's skills check sheet, and the competency form reviewed did not include priming an insulin pen, despite the insulin instructions stating the pen must be primed before each injection.
A facility failed to ensure a QMA had a current license while distributing meds to residents. Record review showed the QMA was scheduled and worked on multiple days across 3 resident units, but the licensure binder and Indiana License Registry showed the QMA's license had expired. The ED stated staff should not distribute meds with an expired QMA license and that the facility had no written policy requiring QMAs to work with a current license.
Missing Mandatory Orientation and Training for Agency CNA: The facility assigned an agency CNA to provide resident care without documentation showing completion of required orientation and in-service training. The CNA stated they did not receive orientation, a training packet, or training on abuse/neglect, dementia care, behavioral health, trauma-informed care, or managing difficult behaviors before working on resident units. The ADON/Staff Educator and DON stated the required training should have been completed and documented in the employee file, but the records could not be located.
CNA Competency Review Completed After Annual Evaluation: The facility failed to ensure that a CNA received a comprehensive clinical competency skills review before the CNA's annual performance evaluation. Record review showed the CNA's annual performance review was completed before the competency review, and the DSD stated she was unaware of the requirement that the skills competency evaluation be completed prior to the annual evaluation.
Incompetent PEG Tube Medication Administration: An LPN was observed administering crushed medication via a resident’s PEG tube but poured the diluted medication directly into the tube without a syringe, causing it to spill. The LPN then did not know how to connect the syringe to the PEG tube and had to call for help, while the DON provided instruction. The resident had diagnoses including an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer, pain, and aphasia following cerebral infarction, and the DON stated the resident did not receive the full dose of medication.
A resident with urinary retention and BPH required a coude catheter, but when the catheter became obstructed, an LPN told the resident to wait until day shift for a change and did not notify the RN supervisor or seek help. Facility records showed no competency training, return demonstration, or skills validation for Foley or coude catheter care, and multiple nurses said they had not received facility-specific education or competency checks for coude catheter management.
Insulin Pen Priming Competency Not Verified
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff possessed the skills and competencies required when a Licensed Nurse administered Humalog insulin to R19 without priming the Kwik Pen first. On 06/02/2026 at 10:13 AM, R19 walked in the hall with a walker, then went to her room with the nurse to receive insulin. The nurse clicked up seven units in the pen and administered the insulin in R19's left arm without priming the pen, and then verified that she had not primed it and stated she was unaware she was supposed to. When the facility was asked for the nurse's skills check sheet, it could not provide it. Review of a blank medication pass competency check sheet showed no competency assessment for priming an insulin Kwik Pen. The insulin pen instructions in the pamphlet directed staff to prime the pen before each injection, and Administrative Nurse D stated she expected staff to prime the insulin pen with two units before administration. She also stated that nurses were required to complete an insulin competency check-off upon hire, and later verified that the nursing skills check lacked a competency item for priming an insulin Kwik Pen.
Expired QMA License During Medication Distribution
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a Qualified Medical Assistant had a current license while distributing medications to residents. A record review showed that QMA 3 was scheduled to distribute medications and had worked as a QMA on multiple days across three resident units from April through the review period. The facility's Employee Certification and Licensure binder showed that QMA 3's license had expired, and the Indiana License Registry website also indicated the license was expired. In interviews, the Executive Director stated that staff should not distribute medications with an expired QMA license and that the facility did not have a written policy requiring QMAs to work with a current license.
Missing Mandatory Orientation and Training for Agency CNA
Penalty
Summary
Certified Nurse Aide #1 was assigned resident care duties on 05/11/2026 as agency staff, but the facility could not provide documentation showing completion of required orientation and mandatory training before the aide worked independently. The missing documentation included, but was not limited to, Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation Prohibition, Behavioral Care Services/Cognitive Impairment/Dementia Training, Trauma Informed Care, Communication Training, and other required orientation and in-service training elements. During the survey, the Assistant Director of Nursing/Staff Educator stated agency staff are required to complete the same mandatory orientation and in-service training as facility staff and that training modules, sign-off documentation, and post-tests are maintained in employee files. However, the facility was unable to locate records verifying that Certified Nurse Aide #1 completed the required training. Certified Nurse Aide #1 stated they did not receive orientation, a training packet, or any of the listed training topics before being assigned to provide resident care on Units 2 and 3. The Administrator also stated that all staff are required to complete mandatory orientation and in-service training prior to working independently and that documentation should have been maintained in the employee file.
CNA Competency Review Completed After Annual Evaluation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its policy regarding nursing staff competency by not ensuring that CNA 3 received a comprehensive clinical competency skills review before the CNA's annual performance evaluation. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/29/2026 at 12:18 p.m., the Director of Staff Development reviewed CNA 3's personnel file, the C.N.A. Comprehensive Clinical Competency Review- Skills Checklist form, and the Annual Performance Review form. The review showed that CNA 3's clinical competency review was completed on 1/22/2026, while the annual performance evaluation was completed earlier, on 12/24/2025. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/29/2026 at 12:26 p.m., the Director of Staff Development reviewed the facility's policy titled Nursing Staffing Competency and stated she was unaware of the facility's requirement that the annual skills competency evaluation be completed prior to a CNA's annual performance evaluation. The policy stated that the facility will identify annual skills competencies needed for each role and establish a schedule or process to facilitate completion of skills and competency evaluations, and that successfully completed orientation and skills check are required prior to the employee's annual evaluation.
Incompetent PEG Tube Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the necessary competency skills to administer medication via PEG tube for one resident. During an observed medication pass, an LPN prepared crushed medication for the resident’s PEG tube, donned a gown and gloves, stopped the tube feeding, and checked placement and residual. The LPN then poured water and the crushed medication into a 30 ml cup and attempted to pour the diluted medication directly into the PEG tube without using a syringe, causing the medication to spill out over and around the tube. The LPN then obtained another cup with diluted medication and a syringe but did not know how to connect the syringe to the PEG tube, hesitated, activated the call light, and stated they would call for assistance. The DON later entered the room and provided instructional assistance to the LPN on administering medication through the PEG tube. The resident had diagnoses including an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer, pain, and aphasia following cerebral infarction. A physician order directed flushing the PEG tube with 30 ml of water before and after medications and 15 ml between each medication. The LPN stated they were unsure how much medication the resident received when the diluted medication spilled during administration. The DON stated the LPN did not correctly administer the medication via the PEG tube, that the medication was spilled and the resident did not receive the full dose, and that the LPN should have notified the physician. The DON also stated the facility used skills competency checklists upon hire and yearly during a skills fair, but the LPN did not have a skills competency checklist completed upon hire and was past the 90-day timeframe for completion.
Lack of competency validation for coude catheter care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed and demonstrated the competencies needed to safely assess, manage, and provide care for residents requiring a coude catheter. Resident 9 was admitted with urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and a care plan dated March 30, 2026, identified the need for a coude catheter. On May 7, 2026, nurse documentation and interview with the DON showed the resident’s coude catheter became obstructed during the night shift, and the LPN on duty told the resident he would need to wait until day shift staff arrived for the catheter to be changed. The DON stated the LPN reported she was not comfortable changing the coude catheter because of a lack of familiarity and experience with that type of catheter, and she did not notify the RN supervisor or seek assistance to ensure timely catheter intervention. Review of facility documentation titled Skilled Nursing Competency Training showed competencies listed for licensed practical nurses, including nephrostomy tubes and suprapubic catheters, but the facility did not include competency training, return demonstration, or skills validation for Foley catheter insertion, Foley catheter management, or coude catheter care and replacement. During interviews, four licensed nurses stated they had general catheter education in nursing school and prior experience with coude catheters at previous employers, but all reported the facility had not provided facility-specific education, training, competency evaluation, or skills validation related to coude catheter care, evaluation, insertion, replacement, or management. The DON was unable to provide documented evidence that licensed nursing staff had completed education, training, competency evaluations, or demonstrated proficiency for Foley catheter care or specialized coude catheter management.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.