Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0576
D

Failure to Provide Language-Appropriate Communication Services

Glendale, California Survey Completed on 12-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident whose preferred language was Farsi was provided with appropriate communication and interpretation services. The resident, who was cognitively intact and able to make decisions, had a medical history including a right patella fracture, acute respiratory failure, and diabetes. Despite documentation indicating the resident's language preference as Farsi, the comprehensive care plans did not address the resident's communication needs or language preference. Additionally, the psychosocial assessment incorrectly listed Armenian as the primary language/interpreter. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident could not communicate effectively in English and only responded with simple yes or no answers and hand gestures. Staff members assumed the resident was 'ok' based on mannerisms and did not utilize interpreter services or contact the resident's family for interpretation. The facility's policy required access to translation services for residents with limited English proficiency, but this was not followed in the resident's case, resulting in a failure to accurately assess and address the resident's needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙