Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Update Care Plan for Gastrostomy Tube Dislodgement

Austin, Texas Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with a history of intractable epilepsy, malnutrition, aphasia, dysphasia, intellectual disability, and anoxic brain damage, who was dependent on a gastrostomy tube for nutrition. The care plan did not include instructions or interventions for managing situations when the resident’s gastrointestinal tube became dislodged, despite multiple documented incidents of tube dislodgement that required medical intervention or hospitalization. The care plan only referenced checking tube placement and gastric contents, omitting guidance for tube removal or replacement. Record reviews revealed that the resident’s PEG tube had become dislodged on several occasions, leading to physician visits and hospital transfers for tube replacement. Staff interviews confirmed that there was no specific training or education provided to CNAs regarding the handling of PEG tubes during care, nor were there updates to the care plan following these incidents. The CNA involved in one incident reported not receiving additional training after the event, and both the CNA and LVN stated that having clear care plan instructions would have been beneficial for staff unfamiliar with the resident’s needs. Administrative staff, including the DON and ADM, acknowledged that care plans should be updated to reflect significant changes or incidents, such as hospitalization due to device dislodgement. However, the care plan was not revised to address the management of the resident’s PEG tube dislodgement, and the facility’s care plan policy was not provided upon request. This lack of comprehensive care planning placed the resident at risk for complications related to indwelling devices.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙