Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
E

Failure to Check Apical Pulse Before Administering Heart Medication

Reseda, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) failed to check a resident's apical pulse prior to administering Flecainide, a heart medication, as required by the physician's order. The resident, who had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and was cognitively intact, had a specific order to hold the medication if the apical pulse was less than 60 beats per minute. Despite this, the LVN administered the medication without taking the apical pulse, relying only on the radial pulse and blood pressure measurements. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for three consecutive months showed that the apical pulse was not taken before administering Flecainide on multiple occasions. The MARs for March, April, and May indicated repeated failures to document the apical pulse prior to medication administration, confirming that this was an ongoing issue rather than an isolated incident. The resident's care plan also specified the need to assess and monitor vital signs as ordered, which was not followed in practice. Interviews with the LVN and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the LVN was unaware of the requirement to check the apical pulse and that the electronic medical record system did not prompt for this parameter. The facility's policy required medications to be administered according to physician orders, but this was not adhered to in the case of this resident. The facility pharmacist had also recommended that the apical pulse be checked before administering Flecainide, but this recommendation was not implemented prior to the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙