Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0909
D

Failure to Inspect and Maintain Safe Bed Equipment

Galena, Kansas Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to regularly inspect a resident's bed frame and mattress as part of its maintenance program, specifically to identify areas of possible entrapment. The resident involved had a diagnosis of dementia with severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by low BIMS scores, and was dependent on staff for bed mobility. Observations revealed a persistent gap of approximately six inches between the top of the mattress and the head of the bed. Staff interviews confirmed that the mattress had been shorter than the bed frame for an extended period, and maintenance staff had not checked the bed because it was supplied by hospice and not considered a facility bed. The resident's care plan noted that hospice would provide the bed and mattress, but there was no evidence that the facility ensured the equipment was safe or properly fitted. The facility's policy required reasonable accommodations to individualize the resident's environment, including the bedroom, but this was not followed in this case. The lack of inspection and failure to address the mismatch between the mattress and bed frame placed the resident at risk for injury.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙